Upload
mliss
View
54
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Parenting into two worlds in northern Namibia. Jill Brown Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology Creighton University 41 st Annual Meeting of the Society for Cross Cultural Research. Socially distributed child care. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Jill Brown Ph.D.Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology
Creighton University
41 s t Annual Meeting of the Society for Cross Cultural Research
Parenting into two worlds in northern Namibia
Socially distributed child careChild caretaking often occurs as a part of indirect chains of support
in which one child assists another, who assists another. Support is not always immediate and not necessarily organized around exclusive relationships between parent and child
Aggression, teasing, and dominance coincide with nurturance and support and come from the same people. Dominance increases with age
Food and other material goods are used to threaten, control, soothe, and comfort
Children are socialized within the system through apprenticeship learning of their family roles and responsibilities.
Children look to other children for support as much or more than they look to adults
Care often occurs in the context of other domestic workElaborate verbal exchanges and question-framed discourse rarely
accompany support and nurturance for children. Verbal bargaining and negotiations over rights, choices and privileges between the caretaker and child are infrequent
Social and intellectual competence is judged by a child’s ability to manage domestic tasks, demonstrate appropriate social behavior, do child care, and nurture and support others. School achievement emerges as a competency
Mothers provide support and nurturance to children as much by securing that others will support their children as by supporting their children directly. Fostering and other forms of child sharing are common
Weisner, T.S., Bradley, C., Kilbride, P.L. (1997). (Eds.) African families and the crisis of
social change. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
Child Fosterage
Goody (1982) defined it as, “institutional delegation of the nurturance and/or educational elements of the parental role. Fosterage does not affect the status identity of the child, nor the jural rights and obligations this entails” (p.23). Fosterage is the rearing of a child by someone other than the biological parent.
Additive not substitutive
Table 1. Patterns of fostered children as a percentage of all children under age 15 in selected countries Living with
Country Survey Year # Surveyed Both Mother only Father onlyFoster/neither
Southern (median) 50.7 18.4 2.7 11.3Namibia DHS 2000 13,641 26.4 29.2 3.6 26.3Zimbabwe DHS 1999 11,313 45.6 20.5 3.6 12.5Botswana MICS 2000 9,950 26.1 33.1 2.1 19.4
Eastern (median) 70.7 10.7 1.8 5.2Kenya MICS 2000 16,394 57.9 20.5 2.3 7.0Uganda DHS 2000 19,538 60.4 12.4 4.0 9.9Tanzania DHS 1999 8,293 62.5 13.8 4.3 9.4
Western (median) 66.3 9.8 3.1 9.0Ghana DHS 1998 9,379 49.1 26.3 4.5 13.2Sierra Leo MICS 2000 10,131 60.9 8.8 5.0 10.3Nigeria DHS 1999 17,027 72.0 5.1 2.4 5.8
Central (median) 65.6 12.1 3.2 7.9C.A.R. MICS 2000 47,516 68.1 10.0 4.7 6.4Gabon DHS 2000 12,481 41.4 28.1 6.6 14.6Cameroon MICS 2000 10,979 65.6 11.5 3.8 7.9
Adapted from Monasch, R. & Boerma, J.T. (2004). Orphanhood and childcare patterns in sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of national surveys from 40 countries. AIDS, 18(2), S55-S65
Child Fosterage
The process of raising a child (nonbiological)
Oluteku
14%
42%
37%
4%2%
1%
Son/daughterGrandchildBrother/SisterOther relativeAdopted/fosteredNon relative
Distribution of Owambo children’s kinship relationship to head of household(N=5942)
Education markers for biological and fostered boys and girls
FemaleMale
Sex of child
4.25
4
3.75
3.5
Educ
atio
n in
sing
le ye
ars
biologicalfoster
Foster Status
FemaleMale
Sex of child
1.00
0.96
0.92
0.88
0.84
0.80
Prob
ablit
y of a
ttend
ing
scho
ol
biologicalfostered
Foster status
(F(4, 3,766)=4.44, MSE=21.97, p=.03) (F(1, 3,766)=7.38, MSE=.811, p=.007)
Height and weight percentile of biological children vs. fostered children
FemaleMale
Sex of child
28.00
26.00
24.00
22.00
20.00
18.00
16.00
14.00
12.00
Heig
ht P
erce
ntile
biologicalfoster
Foster Status
FemaleMale
Sex of child
25.00
20.00
15.00
Weig
ht p
erce
ntile
biologicalfoster
Foster Status
Height and Weight percentile were calculated using the CDC Standard Deviation-derived Growth Reference Curves derived from the NCHS/CDC Reference PopulationsN=1303
(F (4, 1299)=5.00, MSE=3835.4, p=.025)
FemaleMale
Sex of household member
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
Year
s of e
duca
tion not related
adopted/fosteredother relativebrother/sistergrandchildson/daughter
Relationship with head of household
FemaleMale
Sex of household member
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
Prob
ablili
ty o
f atte
ndin
g sc
hool
not relatedadopted/fosteredother relativebrother/sistergrandchildson/daughter
Relationship to the head of household
Education of children with different relationships with the head of household
F(12, 3790)=6.05, MSE=29.46, p=.001 F (5,3758)=5.95, MSE=.64, p=.001
Child FosterageMotivations: Teaching Discipline (Bledsoe, 1990)
Education (Isiugo-Abanihe, 2003)
Gifting/sharing (Madhavan, 2004)
Establishing Social Bonds (Brown, 2011)
Enhanced Fertility (Pennington, 1991; Isiugo-Abanihe, 1984)
Entering New Relationship (Vandermeersch & Chimere-Dan, 2002)
Times of Crisis (Brown, 2009; McDaniel & Zulu, (2008)
Apprenticeship/Domestic work (Bledsoe, 1998)
Outcomes: Health and iIlness (Brown, 2009)
Education (Brown, 2009; Anderson, 2006)
Work (Bledsoe, 1990)
Ongoing fieldwork Case Study: 4 families
3 connected through fostering (one not) September –November 2006
Life History Interviews 11 women fostered as children
Ethnography of nonkin boys
8 non related boys and families June-July 2009 Interviews, observations and field notes audio taped
and transcribed in English
Fosterage Chains
Themes
Reasons to foster
Negotiation
The actual exchange
Maintaining the
relationship:After the exchange
Refusing, Appeasing,Withholding
Equality as a cultural
ideal
“The small ones are difficult sometimes. They get sick and you are not the mother. You are not the one who she wants when she is sick, and when she was two or three days old, if you were not the one to care for her, it is difficult to know if the child is not doing well.” MN
“Me, I hate Popi showing people that this is my biological mother and I am not the biological mother of her. I hate those things. She said that it creates something between me and her. It works the opposite. There are children who are having those bad behaviors and do this to other children. One of those children is my own.” NK
Themes
Reasons to foster
Negotiation
The actual exchange
Maintaining the
relationship:After the
exchange
Refusing, Appeasing,Withholding
Equality as a cultural
ideal
“You can do no other than take the child” NK
“We thought she was just coming to visit but after one, two, three days we then asked, “Sisco when are you leaving?” Sisco said, “No, Meme, I am not leaving.” I said, “For what good reason?” I couldn’t say go back so I said, “Wait until Tate comes home and we will sit and talk because you can’t just come and stay with someone without informing them.” I know she is a true orphan and that is why we allow it.” MN
Age whenFostered
Participant Reason (primary arrangement when multiple)
Number of arrange-ments
Years inFosterage(out of 18)
Emily 3 months Paternal relative Namesake, childless woman
1 12
Karen 6 months Maternal great aunt
Mother working couldn’t afford childcare
2 17
Emelia 1 Maternal grandmother
Young mother 1 17
Liberty 1 ½ Non-kin Mother went into exhile due to war
7 13
Cecelia 3 Maternal grandmother
Help mat. Grandmother pound mahangu
1 15
Loide 5 Maternal aunt Orphan, education 2 18
Francina 7 Maternal aunt Mother died, went to childless woman
1 8
Erica 7 Paternal aunt Namesake 1 11
Nangula 7 Maternal grandmother
Education 1 6
Ndapewa 13 Maternal cousin Wedding gift, education (namesake)
1 5
Berta 3 Paternal relative namesake 1 2
Children are not people..they are children
“So when we go for holiday at Christmas I am together with my parents and they treat us nicely and every time we want to talk to our mother and father about our problems, like I have this problem and that problem, I had to keep it inside myself. Even the bad treatment I get from my grandmother I have to keep it strictly to myself. “
“You must trust the family, but you don’t have power over it. Even if the child is telling me about the treatment, we are the adults and we do not listen. To adults it is just talk.”
Preservation and Dissolution of Sibling Groups
“We played together. The time we are fetching water we can yell for each other. ‘Come on Olivia ‘let’s go’. The time we go to pick up omauni [fruit] or evanda [spinach] in the bush we are together. We go to church together. And we go to Sunday school together. It was very good.”
“At first it was very difficult. I am oshivele (firstborn) and it is difficult because the one that came after me, that I use to wash and carry, I saw her when she was grown up. I wasn’t even thinking she is my sister. They said, yeah this is your sister, but it didn’t feel like it. I was happy to meet her but it didn’t feel like she was my sister. That was the tragedy in this, you see.”
Moral development “My mother died earlier so I got
that love but not too much let me say that if you are staying longer with your mother then you have to learn more, how to suffer, how to survive. That is what I used to tell my kids ‘don’t think you will always stay with your parents’.”
“I feel I am lucky being raised by my grandparents because my attitude compared to my brothers and sisters who were raised by their own parents is quite, quite different. I can’t say that I am better than them but I have different ideas. I think I am stronger in the mind and I have developed into a person who can endure and does good for others.”
Independent self construalautonomy, independence
Interdependent self construalrelatedness (Kagitcibasi, 1996; Greenfield & Suzuki, 1998,
Keller, 2008)
Parental ethnotheories and cultural pathways to development
Market Economy vs. Economy of Affection (Hyden, 1992)
Competent adults
What are the implication of the ‘ foot in two worlds position’ implied in the economy of affection to parenting among the Aaumbo in Namibia?
Central Question
Aaumbo USTradition and
conformityPower and
AchievementBenevolence and
prosocialRelatednessAgency
Agency/Self directionBenevolence and
prosocialTradition and
conformityRelatednessPower and
achievement
0
1
2
3
45
6
Tradition/Conform
ity
Power/Achievement
Benevolence
Relatedness
Agency/Self Dire
ction US
Aau
mbo
USAaumbo
Mean scores on Values and Goals (Suizzo, 2007) for Aaumbo and US mothers
Ovafika (apprenticeship fosterage)
FemaleMale
Sex of household member
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
Prob
ablili
ty o
f atte
ndin
g sc
hool
not relatedadopted/fosteredother relativebrother/sistergrandchildson/daughter
Relationship to the head of household
Brown, J. (2009) Child Fosterage and the Developmental Outcomes of Ovambo Children in Namibia: Implications for Gender and Kinship Childhood in Africa 1(1): 4-10.
ConclusionsMerger of these two worlds into parenting
beliefs and practices
Not two separate worlds?
Fosterage carries and reflects the realities of these two potentially conflicting maintenance systems.