Upload
duongkhanh
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/14/2014
1
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & ExpoTexas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
NUTS AND BOLTSTCEP PRECEPTOR TRAINING
Santhi Masilamani, Pharm D, CDE, MBA
Director, Ambulatory APPE
TPA
August 2, 2014
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Acknowledgments
• Thanks and acknowledgements to TSHP and to TCEP member schools and Experiential Education personnel– Nancy Ordonez, University of Houston
– Anna Brozick, Texas A&M Rangel College of Pharmacy
– Flora Estes, Shantera Davis and Willie Capers, Texas Southern University
– Craig Cox, Texas Tech
– Jeff Copeland, University of the Incarnate Word
– Lisa Killam‐Worrall, University of North Texas
– Jennifer Ridings‐Myhra and Bill McIntyre, University of Texas
• Santhi Masilamani has no disclosures or conflicts of interest
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Learning Objectives
• Describe the goals of experiential education as defined by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education and the Texas State Board of Pharmacy.
• Define the preceptor’s role in experiential education.• Explain the rationale and history behind introductory
pharmacy practice experience (IPPE).• Compare and contrast introductory and advanced
pharmacy practice experiential education competencies.• List benefits of precepting introductory and advanced
pharmacy practice experiences.
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Goals of experiential education
• “The college must provide a continuum of required and elective pharmacy practice experiences throughout the curriculum, from introductory to advanced, of adequate scope, intensity, and duration to support the advancement of professional competencies.”
ACPE: “Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree.” Effective 14 February, 2011. Accessed at https://www.acpe‐accredit.org/pdf/FinalS2007Guidelines2.0.pdf. June 1, 2012
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
General Guidelines
• The pharmacy practice experiences should provide:– multiple opportunities to perform patient-centered care
activities in a variety of settings – in-depth, structured, and carefully coordinated – active participation and patient care responsibilities– progressive practice skills– professional behavior– confidence– personal responsibility
• Site-specific learning objectives– Competencies– Types of patients/ major disease states/conditions– Level of student responsibility/extent of student
interaction
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Pharmacy Practice Experiences
• Introductory
– P1 , P2, P3
• Advanced
– P4
7/14/2014
2
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Rationale and history ‐ Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience (IPPE)
• Increasing responsibility that needs an early complement to didactic curriculum
• Develop professionalism– Attendance, respect, dress
• Develop comfort and confidence• Develop real time processing speed
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
ACPE Standard 14.4 (IPPE)
• Community and institutional practice
• Direct patient care
• Various formats
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Preceptor’s Role
Roles
• Role model
• Coach
• Guide
• Prospective employer
Responsibilities• Provide significant interaction
with students• Supervise student activities• Provide up to date and
structured learning experience• Assess students
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Preceptor Sharing
• Role model– Stories of personal career path
– Ask the student about their career goals
– Discuss pros and cons of the job
– Discuss interests outside of pharmacy
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Preceptor teaching model
Instruction
Modeling
Coaching
Facilitating
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Direct Instruction
• At the beginning of a rotation:– Assigned books– Lectures– Articles– Discussions
• P4– Refer to relevant resources and check understanding during daily
duties– No classroom type lectures needed
• P1, P2, P3– College takes care of didactic lectures– Check knowledge as appropriate to year in school
7/14/2014
3
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Modeling
• Preceptor demonstrating skill or process
– Thinking out loud
– For P1, P2, P3, and P4
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Modeling Example
• Which of the following scenarios is considered modeling?1. Thinking out loud while creating an assessment and plan2. Silently performing a DUR, then counseling the patient in
front of the student3. Whizzing through the labs in the EMR and ordering a Scr
level
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Coaching
• Student performs skill– Preceptor observes– Comes after direct instruction and modeling– P1, P2, P3
• Takes 3‐4 weeks of constant exposure
– P4• Takes 1‐2 weeks of constant exposure
• Preceptor gives feedback– Based on specific criteria– Verbal and documented
• “Good job” vs “student was able to state specific and appropriate therapeutic goals for hyperlipidemia”
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Coaching examples
• Student interviews patient for medication history
• Student counsels patient on new medication
• Student conducts CMR
• What others can you think of?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Facilitating
• Independent performance– After coaching– After corrective feedback is no longer needed– Progressively increase complexity of care provided by
student
• P1, P2, P3– Depending on task, each individual takes a different amount
of time
• P4– 2‐4 weeks
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Facilitating examples
• Student interviews patient and reports to you
• Student does discharge counseling
• Student immunizes patient
• Student rounds with hospital team
7/14/2014
4
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Compare & Contrast IPPE and APPE Competencies
IPPE APPE
• processing and dispensing new/refill medication orders • patient interviews • creating patient profiles
• responding to drug information inquiries • interacting with other health care professionals• participating in public health educational offerings• interpreting and evaluating patient information• triaging and assessing the need for treatment or referral• assessing patient health literacy and compliance • compound, dispense, and administer medications• evaluating appropriateness of medication dosing • point-of - care and patient-centered services• physical assessments • preparing and compounding extemporaneous preps and sterile
products • communicating with patients & health care providers • interacting with pharmacy technicians• documenting interventions in patient records• presenting patient billing third parties
• utilizing practical pharmacokinetic principles• administering medications• identifying and reporting medication errors and
adverse drug reactions• managing the drug regimen through monitoring and
assessing patient information• retrieving, evaluating, managing, and using clinical
and scientific publications• accessing, evaluating, and applying information to
promote optimal health care • ensuring continuity of care among health care
settings• participating in discussions and assignments
regarding compliance with accreditation, legal, regulatory/legislative, and safety requirements
• participating in discussions and assignments regarding drug approval process and the role of key organizations in public safety and standards setting
• participating in discussions and assignments concerning key health care policy matters
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Activity
• Pair and compare
– List IPPE activities at your site in the left hand column
– List APPE activities on the right hand column
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Benefits of precepting IPPE and APPE
• Student pharmacist involvement and contributions at your site– Patient counseling– Medication histories– Med reconciliation– ADE reporting and tracking– Literature search– Follow up phone calls– MTM prep– Data collection/outcomes evaluation– Publications– What does the audience say?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
References
• Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Website. https://www.acpe‐accredit.org/pdf/FinalS2007Guidelines2.0.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2012.
• CAPE Educational Outcomes 2013. Center for the advancement of pharmacy education. http://www.aacp.org/Documents/CAPEoutcomes071213.pdf
• Texas Administrative Code. (Texas State Board of Pharmacy Rules). http://info.sos.state.tx.us/pls/pub/readtac$ext.ViewTAC?tac_view=3&ti=22&pt=15.
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Questions?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
7/14/2014
1
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & ExpoTexas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
TCEP PRECEPTOR DEVELOPMENT:STUDENT ASSESSMENT, CASE SCENARIOS, AND THE RUBRIC
Anna H. Brozick, Pharm.D., M.M.
Assistant Professor and Director of Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experiences
Texas A&M Rangel College of Pharmacy
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Acknowledgments
• Thanks and acknowledgements to TSHP and to TCEP member schools and Experiential Education personnel:
• Flora Estes, Shantera Davis and Willie Capers, Texas Southern University
• Craig Cox, Texas Tech• Nancy Ordonez and Santhi Masilamani, University of Houston• Jeff Copeland, University of the Incarnate Word• Lisa Killam‐Worrall, University of North Texas• Jennifer Ridings‐Myhra and Bill McIntyre, University of Texas• My colleagues at Texas A&M• The presenter has no disclosures nor conflicts of interest
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Learning Objectives
1. Develop strategies for providing criteria‐referenced, student‐centered assessments of student pharmacists.
2. Identify the consistent characteristics of the A student, F student, and the student in between.
3. Assess student competence using the TCEP standardized grading rubric.
4. Discuss effective feedback and evaluation methods of student pharmacists.
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Criteria‐referenced and student‐centered assessments
• Where do the criteria come from?
• The professional competencies: similar for IPPE and APPE, with some notable distinctions
• Texas State Board of Pharmacy (TSBP)
• Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE)
• Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE)
• Texas Consortium on Experiential Programs (TCEP)
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Criteria‐referenced = professional competencies
• Both the IPPE and APPE clerkships require preceptors to assess student professional competence.
• When comparing APPE vs. IPPE students and their competency requirements, the skills are similar.
• The distinction between APPE and IPPE expectations are the breadth and depth of the competency statements.
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Discussion
• Group discussion question 1: When assessing a student on the professional competencies, is it possible for a student to earn a “5?”
• Question 2: Are there assessment distinctions between an APPE and an IPPE student?
• Answer: there are likely as many different answers or interpretations as there are preceptors in the room.
7/14/2014
2
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Student‐centered assessments
• I advocate that students (both IPPE and APPE) can earn a 5, because accreditation requires both criteria‐referenced and student‐centered evaluations.
• Expectations should be established that allow students to reach competence at their current professional level.
• P2 expectations would differ from P4 expectations
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Example
• You are precepting a P4 student on their 5th APPE clerkship. The student continues to present incomplete patient assessment and SOAP notes. Additionally, their interventions lack clinical judgment and when you outline the expectations of an accurate patient assessment and work‐up, the student responds he/she knows what to do, but just does not have the time to finish all the patients you assign.
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Student‐centered
• During the 4th week of the rotation, the student’s performance still has not improved, and in‐fact you believe it has worsened.
• As you inquire further, you learn that their mother passed away on the 4th day of rotation.
• What are the student‐centered concerns you recognize in this scenario?
• What solutions do you have or want to recommend for your APPE student?
• Other steps – call your Experiential Directors and/or Deans.
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
General Characteristics of the A‐student vs. the F‐student
A‐student F‐student
Flexible Inflexible, easily frustrated
Independent and self‐directed learner
Dependent on others, insecure, needs guidance
Motivated Easily discouraged
Persistent Lack of follow‐through
Strong work ethic Lazy
Self‐advocate No sense of purpose
Consistent Inconsistent/unreliable
Connected Disconnected/lacks resources
Organized Disorganized, cluttered, lateConcordia University. Top 10 characteristics of high‐performing graduate school students. http://education.cu‐portland.edu/blog/masters‐resources/top‐10‐characteristics‐of‐high‐performing‐graduate‐school‐students/
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
How do these characteristics translate to pharmacy student behaviors and skills?
A‐student Demonstrated knowledge, skills, attitudes, values and behaviors in the pharmacy
Flexible Ex. Student responds calmly under pressure when an angry patient or nurse makes accusationsagainst him or the pharmacy staff
Independent and self‐directed learner
Ex. Student is unable to recall the answer on the spot, and instead looks up the answer on her own time and reports back to the preceptor, unsolicited
Motivated Ex. Student attends state conference on an innovative topic and reports back to you ways to incorporate idea into the pharmacy work‐flow
Persistent Ex. Student continues to search through the primary literature until discovering the answer to an allusive and complex DI question
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Think, pair, and share
F‐student Demonstrated knowledge, skills, attitudes, values and behaviors in the pharmacy
Inflexible, easilyfrustrated
Dependent on others, insecure, needs guidance
Easily discouraged
Lack of follow‐through
7/14/2014
3
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Using the TCEP rubric5 = Excellent 4.5 = Very Good 4 = Good 3.5 = Minimal
Competency 3 = Needs
Improvement 2 = Significant Deficits Exist
1 = Unacceptable
Student has excelled in performing competency. Student has exceeded expectations and can function independently at all times.
Student performed competency very well.(acceptable ≥ 90% of time) Student has met expectations and requires minimal to no guidance from preceptor (can perform independently ≥ 90% of time).
Student performed the competency well. (acceptable ≥ 80% of time) Student has met expectations and can complete task in a supervised situation with limited guidance from preceptor (can perform independently ≥ 80% of time).
Student performed the competency at an acceptable level. (acceptable ≥ 70% of time) Student has met expectations but requires occasional guidance from preceptor (can perform independently ≥ 70% of time).
Student knows how to achieve competency, but has not consistently demonstrated it at an acceptable level (acceptable <70% of time). Student requires significant guidance from preceptor (can perform independently <70% of time).
Student knows how to achieve competency, but rarely demonstrates it (acceptable <50% of time). Student requires significant guidance from preceptor, and preceptor must often complete it for student (can perform independently <50% of time).
Student does not know how to achieve competency. Student does not function independently and requires direct supervision by preceptor at all times.
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Using the grading rubric to assess student performance
• Hints:
• Read the fine print, not just the bold‐face
• Set realistic expectations: IPPE vs. APPE student levels
• Compare expectations: 1st rotation vs. 6th
rotation
• Group Question 3: What other factors do you consider when assessing the student and assigning a grade?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Case scenarios
• Osteoporosis: there will be 3 different students, each at a different competency level – A, F, and in‐between
• Setting: all 3 students are P4 students on their 4th APPE –ambulatory clerkship. This is just prior to the midpoint evaluation. You want to assess their readiness to perform the MTM consultations independently.
• When watching the video, address which competencies these skills are related to.
• Watch videos, take notes, and assign a score, 1‐5.1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaaUV6N08BU
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qo9N1qemZRg
3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reZlzg24rucTexas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Video acknowledgement• Videos courtesy of Charles Douglas, Ph.D., M.B.A., Assistant Professor of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Texas A&M Rangel College of Pharmacy
• Developed with grant support from American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) for the 2013 New Investigator Award
• You may contact Dr. Charles Douglas for access to videos and more information.
• [email protected]• Thank you Dr. Douglas!
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
More evaluation tools
• Is it always necessary to use a grading rubric to provide feedback?
• What other methods for feedback and assessment do you utilize?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Feedback vs. Assessment
Formative Summative
Why? Monitor learning and progress – identify strengths and weaknesses
Evaluate competence –assess knowledge, skills, values, attitudes, and behaviors
When? On‐going feedback, any time during the practice experiences, on the fly
Cumulative, final feedback, scheduled time
How? Discussion, SOAPs, periodic feedback
Exam, project, formal case presentation
What? Less formal, non‐graded tasks
Formal, graded assignments
From Carnegie Mellon, Eberly center for teaching excellence and educational innovation. https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/basics/formative‐summative.html
7/14/2014
4
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Effective feedback
• Discussion question 4: Is it more difficult to provide constructive feedback to the A‐student, the F‐student, or the student in‐between?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Techniques for effective feedback
• Timely – if the error occurred during the first week of rotation and you wait until their final evaluation during week 6, what can the student do to improve or change?
• Specific
– Based on observed behavior
– Regulated in quantity
– Provided in a quiet, relaxed setting
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
More information on feedback
• Goal‐referenced – what does the student hope to obtain?
• Actionable – what specific actions should the student change (or not change if they are already doing it right)?
• Tangible and transparent – when you criticize, can the student gain anything from the critique?
• Consistent – set expectations from the beginning
Wiggins G. Seven keys to effective feedback. Educational Leadership 2012; 70(1):10‐16. Accessed from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational‐leadership/sept12/vol70/num01/Seven‐Keys‐to‐Effective‐Feedback.aspx Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Revisiting the video
• Student 1 – “Maria”
• Think, pair and share with your neighbor.
• How would you distinguish between your feedback and your assessment with “Maria.”
• What words will you use to be constructive?
• Any other actions to take?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Questions
• Feel free to contact me for follow‐up and further discussion.
• 361‐221‐0663
• Thank you for your participation this morning!
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
References• Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in
pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Website. https://www.acpe‐accredit.org/pdf/FinalS2007Guidelines2.0.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2012.
• CAPE Educational Outcomes 2013. Center for the advancement of pharmacy education. http://www.aacp.org/Documents/CAPEoutcomes071213.pdf
• Texas Administrative Code. (Texas State Board of Pharmacy Rules). http://info.sos.state.tx.us/pls/pub/readtac$ext.ViewTAC?tac_view=3&ti=22&pt=15.
• Concordia University. Top 10 characteristics of high‐performing graduate school students. http://education.cu‐portland.edu/blog/masters‐resources/top‐10‐characteristics‐of‐high‐performing‐graduate‐school‐students/.
• Carnegie Mellon, Eberly center for teaching excellence and educational innovation. https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/basics/formative‐summative.html
• Wiggins G. Seven keys to effective feedback. Educational Leadership 2012; 70(1):10‐16. Accessed from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational‐leadership/sept12/vol70/num01/Seven‐Keys‐to‐Effective‐Feedback.aspx
TCEP Preceptor Development: Student assessment, case scenarios, and the rubric
Self‐reflection Questions
1. In your own words, how would you describe student‐centered and criteria referenced assessment?
2. What are the biggest barriers to providing effective feedback and assessment at your practice site?
3. How do you compare the common characteristics of the A‐student and the F‐student to the actual students you precept on their pharmacy practice experiences?
4. What feedback tools do you plan to utilize in practice following this presentation?
TCEP Preceptor Development Participant Worksheet
Student‐Centered Assessment
Group question 1. Is it possible for a student to earn a score of “5” on their competency assessment? We will discuss the
“definition” of a 5 later in this presentation. Share your observations, thoughts and opinions.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Group question 2. Are there assessment distinctions (different expectations) between an IPPE and APPE student? Share
your observations, thoughts and opinions.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Think, pair and share with a colleague. What behaviors or skills do you observe or anticipate in the “F‐student” who has
the following characteristics?
F‐student characteristic Observed or anticipated behaviors, knowledge, skills, attitudes, or values
Inflexible and easily frustrated
Dependent on others, insecure, needs continuous guidance
Easily discouraged
Lack of follow‐through
Group question 3. What other factors do you consider when assessing the student and assigning a grade?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Group question 4. Is it more difficult to provide constructive feedback to the A‐student, the F‐student or the student in‐
between?
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Personal Notes/follow‐up.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Patient Case Scenarios: Assess the 3 students using the TCEP grading rubric and competencies listed below from their
video recording: 1. Maria; 2. Linda; 3. Ana
5 = Excellent 4.5 = Very Good 4 = Good 3.5 = Minimal Competency
Student has excelled in performing competency. Student has exceeded expectations and can function independently at all times.
Student performed competency very well.(Is acceptable ≥ 90% of time) Student has met expectations and requires minimal to no guidance from preceptor (can perform independently ≥ 90% of time).
Student performed the competency well. (Is acceptable ≥ 80% of time) Student has met expectations and can complete task in a supervised situation with limited guidance from preceptor (can perform independently ≥ 80% of time).
Student performed the competency at an acceptable level. (Is acceptable ≥ 70% of time) Student has met expectations but requires occasional guidance from preceptor (can perform independently ≥ 70% of time).
3 = Needs Improvement 2 = Significant Deficits Exist 1 = Unacceptable
Student knows how to achieve competency, but has not consistently demonstrated it at an acceptable level (Is acceptable <70% of time). Student requires significant guidance from preceptor (can perform independently <70% of time).
Student knows how to achieve competency, but rarely demonstrates it (Is acceptable <50% of time). Student requires significant guidance from preceptor, and preceptor must often complete it for student (can perform independently <50% of time).
Student does not know how to achieve competency. Student does not function independently and requires direct supervision by preceptor at all times.
Competency 5=excellent 4.5=very good
4=good 3.5=minimal competency
3=needs improvement
2=significant deficits
1=unacceptable 0= not observed or n/a
a. Critical Thinking and Decision Making Abilities
b. Informatics and evidence‐based pharmacotherapy
c. Oral communication
d. Self‐directed learning abilities
e. Disease‐state knowledge
f. Patient information
g. Patient pharmacotherapy assessment
h. Pharmacy care plan
Comments and feedback:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
7/14/2014
1
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & ExpoTexas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
LISA J. KILLAM‐WORRALL, PHARM.D., BCPSASSISTANT DEAN FOR EXPERIENTIAL EDUCATIONASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PHARMACOTHERAPYUNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS SYSTEM COLLEGE OF PHARMACY
TCEP Preceptor Development: TCEP Preceptor Toolkit
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Acknowledgments• Thanks and acknowledgements to TPA and to TCEP member schools and Experiential Education personnel:– Flora Estes, Shantera Davis and Willie Capers, Texas Southern University
– Craig Cox, Texas Tech University
– Nancy Ordonez and Santhi Masilamani, University of Houston
– Jeff Copeland, University of the Incarnate Word
– Jennifer Ridings‐Myhra and Bill McIntyre, University of Texas
– Anna Brozick and Mary Chavez, Texas A&M Health Science Center
• The presenter has no disclosures nor conflicts of interest
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Learning Objectives
1. Access the TCEP preceptor toolkit.
2. Identify the 7 elements and activities in the preceptor toolkit.
3. Describe the necessary components for incorporating experiential students into pharmacy or patient care services.
4. Design pharmacy practice rotation activities consistent with stated objectives and competencies.
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
The Preceptor Toolkit Process
• TCEP Retreat August 2012
− All colleges/schools submitted one form for consideration of adoption by all
− Each form was discussed and revisions were accepted
− Each form contained adopted grading criteria rubric
− Forms will be available from each college/school via electronic system or internet
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
TCEP Preceptor Toolkit
1. Medication Reconciliation
2. Drug Information Inquiry
3. Journal Club
4. Patient Encounter (SOAP Note)
5. Patient Counseling
6. Drug Related Problem Intervention
7. Patient Case PresentationAll forms provided as electronic handout
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Preceptor Roles
• Direct Instruction
• Modeling
• Coaching
• Facilitating
ASHP PGY1 Accreditation Standards
7/14/2014
2
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Discussion
• Which roles are utilized in IPPE rotations?
• Which roles are utilized in APPE rotations?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
SMART Learning Objectives• Specific
− Be precise about outcome
•Measurable− Be able to quantify
• Achievable− Ensure realistic expectations
− Take into account student level of experience and site resources
• Relevant− Align with practice and/or organizational goals
• Timed
ACPE CPD 101 Program
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Discussion
• What are the learning objectives or competencies for the experiences that you precept?
• How do these compare with your expectations for student learning and progress?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
IPPE Activities• Process and dispense new/refill medication orders
– Compounding techniques
– Calculations
• Conduct patient interviews to obtain patient information
• Create patient profiles using information obtained
• Respond to drug information inquiries
• Interpret and evaluate patient information
• Document interventions
• Present patient casesSelected from ACPE Standards Appendix C
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Discussion
• For the IPPE Activities, which Toolkit forms may be useful in providing student feedback?
• What other types of forms would be beneficial for IPPE activities?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
APPE Objectives ‐ General
Selected from ACPE Standards Appendix C
7/14/2014
3
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
APPE Objectives –Community & Institutional
• Create a business plan to support a patient care service, including determining the need, feasibility, resources, and sources of funding
• Manage the medication use system and apply the systems approach to medication safety
• Participate in the pharmacy’s quality improvement program• Participate in the design, development, marketing, and reimbursement
process for new patient services• Participate in discussions and assignments of human resources management,
medication resources management, and pharmacy data management systems, including pharmacy workload and financial performance
• Participate in the pharmacy’s planning process• Conduct a drug use review• Manage the use of investigational drug products • Participate in the health system’s formulary process • Participate in therapeutic protocol development • Participate in the management of medical emergencies
Selected from ACPE Appendix C
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Discussion
• For the APPE Activities, which Toolkit forms may be useful in providing student feedback?
• What other types of forms would be beneficial for APPE activities?
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
Questions
• Feel free to contact any college/school for follow‐up and further discussion of specific requirements and use of the toolkit.
• Thank you for your participation this morning!
Texas Pharmacy Association 2014 Conference & Expo
References• Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in
pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Website. https://www.acpe‐accredit.org/pdf/FinalS2007Guidelines2.0.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2014.
• ASHP Accreditation Standard For Postgraduate Year One (PGY1) Pharmacy Residency Programs. http://www.ashp.org/DocLibrary/Accreditation/ASD‐PGY1‐Standard.aspx. Accessed March 15, 2014.
• Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Continuing professional development (CPD). http://www.acpe‐accredit.org/ceproviders/CPD.asp. Accessed March 15, 2014.