• Home

  • Documents

  • PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number –...
209
PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132-150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact for service please contact both. Where one person is recorded as CONTACT: [name], please contact that person only. Submitter # Submitter / contact for service Company / organisation / iwi/hapū/marae Address Phone Email Page # 132 Marei Apatu Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga PO Box 718,Hastings,New Zealand, 068715350 [email protected] 2 133 Wi Huata 1460 Maraekakaho Road,Bridge Pā,Hastings,New Zealand,3030 021918762 [email protected] 75 134 Willem Kupa Patoka Trust New Zealand, [email protected] 79 John Bostock [email protected] 135 Anna Wilkes Ravensdown Limited 292 Main South Road,PO Box 1059,Christchurch,New Zealand,8140 0212290439 [email protected] 81 Carmen Taylor Planz Consultants Limited PO Box 1845, Christchurch 8140 [email protected] 136 Te Hira Henderson 405 Farndon Road,RD2 Pakowhai,Hastings,New Zealand, 021323563 [email protected] 143 137 Ngatai Huata 805 Norton Road,Akina,Hastings,New Zealand,4122 0226014959 [email protected] 146 138 Marei Apatu 49 Watson Road,RD2,Hastings,New Zealand, 068764245 [email protected] 154 139 Charmaine Pene Taihape Road, Fernhill,Fernhill,New Zealand,Unknown 068796383 [email protected] 161 140 Andrew and Tania Kerr 164 Glengarry Road,RD 2,Napier,New Zealand,4182 0272414758 (Tania) [email protected] 163 141 Danny Angland Kereru Station New Zealand, (06) 8760970 [email protected] 165 142 Bill Glazebrook Big Hill Station Limited RD1 ,Hastings,New Zealand,4171 068760959 [email protected] 167 143 Peter Hyslop Strathallan Trust 1732 Matapiro Road,RD9 ,Hastings,New Zealand,4179 0272402595 [email protected] 175 144 Jamie Wheeler 816 Lawrence St,Akina,Hastings,New Zealand,4122 0224748785 [email protected] 182 145 Peter Raikes Awanui Station New Zealand, [email protected] 183 146 Rebecca Davies New Zealand Defence Force New Zealand, [email protected] 188 147 Serene Morrell Mihiroa Marae Old Main Road,RD11,Hastings,New Zealand,4178 0276479664 [email protected] 195 148 Rahina Huata Mangaroa Marae 805 Collinge Road,Mayfair,Hastings,New Zealand, [email protected] 207 CONTACT: Huia Huata Mangaroa Marae [email protected] 149 Eddie Huata Mangaroa Marae 805 Collinge Road,Mayfair,Hastings,New Zealand, 208 CONTACT: Huia Huata Mangaroa Marae [email protected] 150 Nathan Huata Mangaroa Marae 102 Willowpark Road South,Hastings,New Zealand, [email protected] 209 CONTACT: Huia Huata Mangaroa Marae [email protected]

PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132-150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact for service please contact both. Where one person is recorded as CONTACT: [name], please contact that person only.

Submitter # Submitter / contact for service Company / organisation /

iwi/hapū/marae Address Phone Email Page #

132 Marei Apatu Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga PO Box 718,Hastings,New Zealand, 068715350 [email protected] 2

133 Wi Huata 1460 Maraekakaho Road,Bridge Pā,Hastings,New Zealand,3030 021918762 [email protected] 75

134 Willem Kupa Patoka Trust New Zealand, [email protected] 79 John Bostock [email protected]

135 Anna Wilkes Ravensdown Limited 292 Main South Road,PO Box 1059,Christchurch,New Zealand,8140 0212290439 [email protected] 81

Carmen Taylor Planz Consultants Limited PO Box 1845, Christchurch 8140 [email protected]

136 Te Hira Henderson 405 Farndon Road,RD2 Pakowhai,Hastings,New Zealand, 021323563 [email protected] 143

137 Ngatai Huata 805 Norton Road,Akina,Hastings,New Zealand,4122 0226014959 [email protected] 146 138 Marei Apatu 49 Watson Road,RD2,Hastings,New Zealand, 068764245 [email protected] 154

139 Charmaine Pene Taihape Road, Fernhill,Fernhill,New Zealand,Unknown 068796383 [email protected] 161

140 Andrew and Tania Kerr 164 Glengarry Road,RD 2,Napier,New Zealand,4182 0272414758 (Tania) [email protected] 163

141 Danny Angland Kereru Station New Zealand, (06) 8760970 [email protected] 165 142 Bill Glazebrook Big Hill Station Limited RD1 ,Hastings,New Zealand,4171 068760959 [email protected] 167

143 Peter Hyslop Strathallan Trust 1732 Matapiro Road,RD9 ,Hastings,New Zealand,4179 0272402595 [email protected] 175

144 Jamie Wheeler 816 Lawrence St,Akina,Hastings,New Zealand,4122 0224748785 [email protected] 182 145 Peter Raikes Awanui Station New Zealand, [email protected] 183 146 Rebecca Davies New Zealand Defence Force New Zealand, [email protected] 188 147 Serene Morrell Mihiroa Marae Old Main Road,RD11,Hastings,New Zealand,4178 0276479664 [email protected] 195 148 Rahina Huata Mangaroa Marae 805 Collinge Road,Mayfair,Hastings,New Zealand, [email protected] 207 CONTACT: Huia Huata Mangaroa Marae [email protected] 149 Eddie Huata Mangaroa Marae 805 Collinge Road,Mayfair,Hastings,New Zealand, 208 CONTACT: Huia Huata Mangaroa Marae [email protected] 150 Nathan Huata Mangaroa Marae 102 Willowpark Road South,Hastings,New Zealand, [email protected] 209 CONTACT: Huia Huata Mangaroa Marae [email protected]

Page 2: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 3: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 4: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 5: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 6: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 7: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 8: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 9: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 10: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 11: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 12: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 13: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 14: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 15: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 16: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 17: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 18: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 19: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 20: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 21: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 22: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 23: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 24: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 25: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 26: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 27: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 28: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 29: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 30: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 31: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 32: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 33: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 34: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 35: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 36: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 37: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 38: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 39: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 40: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 41: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 42: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 43: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 44: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 45: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 46: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 47: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 48: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 49: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 50: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 51: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 52: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 53: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 54: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 55: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 56: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 57: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 58: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 59: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 60: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 61: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 62: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 63: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 64: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 65: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 66: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 67: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 68: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 69: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 70: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 71: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 72: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 73: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 74: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 75: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 76: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 77: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 78: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 79: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 80: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 81: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

SUBMISSIONS ON PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 9 – TŪTAEKURĪ, AHURIRI, NGARURORO AND

KARAMŪ CATCHMENTS TO THE HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

TO: Hawkes Bay Regional Council (Council) Private Bag 6006 NAPIER Via email: [email protected]

SUBMITTER: Ravensdown Limited (Ravensdown) 292 Main South Road PO Box 1059 CHRISTCHURCH 8140

Contact: Anna Wilkes Environmental and Policy Manager

Mobile: 021 229 0439 Email: [email protected]

ADDRESS FOR SERVICE: Planz Consultants Limited (Planz) PO Box 1845 CHRISTCHURCH 8140

Contact: Carmen Taylor Consultant Planner (Associate)

Mobile: 021 312 781 Email: [email protected]

Page 82: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Submission on Proposed Plan Change 9 (TANK Catchments) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan

Ravensdown Limited (14 August 2020) 2

1. INTRODUCTION

Ravensdown Limited – Overview and Interests in the Hawke’s Bay Region

1.1 Ravensdown Limited (Ravensdown) is a farmer owned co-operative. Ravensdown’s goal is to enable smarter farming for a better New Zealand. Given this goal, Ravensdown provides products, namely fertiliser and agrochemicals (agrichemicals), expertise and technology to help farmers reduce environmental impacts and to optimise value, or outputs, from land.

1.2 Ravensdown, in deciding whether to participate in regional planning processes, considers whether the plan, or proposed plan change, will achieve the purpose of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) while also evaluating whether the planning provisions will unduly constrain its own activities (i.e., manufacturing, store sites and quarries) and/or the users of their products (i.e., its farming shareholders).

1.3 In this context, the nature of Ravensdown’s interests in the Tūtaekurī, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro and Karamū (TANK) catchments includes the Napier Works at Awatoto , which manufactures a range of fertiliser products which are then supplied throughout the North Island and bulk stores in Napier (Severn Street and Napier Port). In addition, through Ravensdown Environmental, Ravensdown assists its shareholders and others to meet regional planning requirements through the provision of farm environment services, which include nutrient loss and mitigation modelling (including OVERSEER Nutrient Budgeting), Farm Environment Plan (FEP) development and associated resource consent planning services.

1.4 Given the nature of Ravensdown’s activities in the TANK catchment, Ravensdown seeks to ensure that the ‘Proposed Plan Change 9 - Tūtaekurī, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro and Karamū Catchments’ (PPC9) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan (HBRRP) promotes the sustainable management of natural and physical resources, in this instance, the land and water resources contained within TANK catchments. This includes the ability to continue to use and develop resources, including the rural land resource, while ensuring that adverse effects of activities are avoided, remedied or mitigated.

1.5 Given the above context, the provisions of PPC9 are of interest to Ravensdown given its activities within the TANK catchments and the nature of farming activities undertaken by its farming shareholders in the region, as outlined in paragraph 1.3 above. Therefore, in preparing this submission, Ravensdown has focussed on the proposed provisions that relate to their Napier Works site at Awatoto and its bulk stores as well to the provisions which apply to the farming activities undertaken by its farming shareholders within the catchments.

Overview of Submission

1.6 Ravensdown’s submission, given its key interests within the TANK catchments, including the potential implications of PPC9 to the farming community, generally supports PPC9 in terms of its intent to sustainably manage water quality and quantity within the TANK catchments.

1.7 This includes, in relation to farming activities, requiring the identification of actions, and timeframes, to contribute to meeting PPC9’s freshwater quality objectives, including of adoption of good (management) practices, either as part of an Industry Programme or Catchment Collective or via an individual FEP. The requirement for Industry Programmes,

Page 83: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Submission on Proposed Plan Change 9 (TANK Catchments) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan

Ravensdown Limited (14 August 2020) 3

Catchment Collectives and FEPs to be approved and audited, and for FEPs to be prepared by appropriately qualified professionals is also supported.

1.8 In the context of Ravensdown’s operations within the TANK catchments, namely its Napier Works and its Severn Street store, the regulatory framework which effectively recognises and provides these activities, including their resource use activities, is generally supported. This includes requiring such activities to contribute to the achievement of the freshwater quality objectives and reduce water quantity over-allocation is supported. In relation to discharges from such activities, the requirement to implement good site/industry practices is also considered appropriate, as is the need for new resource consents for existing water takes to seek an amount of water that reflects the actual and reasonable needs of such sites.

1.9 However, through these submissions, Ravensdown seeks amendments that enable Ravensdown, its shareholders and the users of its products to continue to use and develop resources in the catchments in a manner that continues to provide for the sustainable management of natural and physical resources, including the region’s land and water resource, while also ensuring that adverse effects on the environment are avoided, remedied or mitigated.

1.10 One of the areas where Ravensdown's submission points, as outlined in the table contained in Attachment A of this submission, is seeking changes relates to the fact that PPC9 is not consistent with the recently gazetted national instruments for healthy waterways, namely the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020, the National Environmental Standards for Freshwater and the associated regulations (e.g., the Resource Management (Stock Exclusion) Regulations 2020). Ravensdown is working hard with its shareholders to get buy-in into the obligations arising from the various national and regional statutory planning documents that are now coming into effect. For this to be successful, it is important that national consistency with these requirements is achieved where possible. While it is recognised that PPC9 was developed prior to the these national instruments coming into force, and while also recognising that these instruments do provide time for some of the provisions to be incorporated into relevant regional planning provisions, Ravensdown considers that where possible, and necessary, PPC9 provisions should be amended to align with these national planning instruments. Given this goal, amendments to PPC9 provisions are being sought by Ravensdown's submission in order to endeavour to achieve alignment with these national instruments.

1.11 Ravensdown’s submissions on PPC9 is structured as follows:

(a) Specific submission points on the provisions of PPC9 to the HBRRP are contained in the table provided in Attachment A;

(b) A conclusion, including the overarching reasons for the submission, is provided in Section 2.

2. CONCLUSION

2.1 Ravensdown generally supports PPC9, subject to the amendments requested to address the concerns raised within its submission. In relation to the provisions that Ravensdown has raised

Page 84: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Submission on Proposed Plan Change 9 (TANK Catchments) to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan

Ravensdown Limited (14 August 2020) 4

concerns about, those provisions require amendment because, without amendment, those provisions:

(a) will not promote sustainable management of resources and will not achieve the purpose of the RMA;

(b) is contrary to Part 2 and other provisions of the RMA;

(c) will not enable the social and economic well-being of the community within the TANK catchments and thus the Hawke’s Bay region;

(d) will not meet the reasonably foreseeable needs of future generations;

(e) will not achieve integrated management of the effects of the use, development or protection of the region’s land and water resources;

(f) will not enable the efficient use and development of Ravensdown’s assets and operations, and of those resources which are dependent on, or benefit from, Ravensdown’s assets and operations; and

(g) do not represent the most appropriate means of exercising Council’s functions, having regard to the efficiency and effectiveness of the provisions relative to other means.

2.2 Ravensdown could not gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission.

2.3 Ravensdown wishes to be heard in support of its submissions.

2.4 If others are making a similar submission, Ravensdown will consider presenting a joint case with them at the hearing.

Date: 14 August2020

………………………………….. Carmen Taylor Consultant Planner (Associate) Authorised to sign this submission on behalf of Ravensdown Limited

Page 85: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A1

ATTA

CHM

ENT

A –

RAVE

NSDO

WN

LIM

ITED

’S S

UBM

ISSI

ONS

ON

PRO

POSE

D PL

AN C

HAN

GE 9

- TŪ

TAEK

URĪ,

AHUR

IRI,

NGAR

URO

RO A

ND

KARA

MŪ

CATC

HMEN

TS

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

Sect

ion

5.10

.1 -

TAN

K O

bjec

tives

Gene

ral O

bjec

tives

1 O

BJ T

ANK

1 8

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

int

ent

outli

ned

in t

his

obje

ctiv

e th

at th

e co

mm

unity

as

a w

hole

hav

e a

role

to

pl

ay

in

the

man

agem

ent

of

the

fresh

wat

er

reso

urce

s as

socia

ted

with

the

TAN

K ca

tchm

ents

. Ra

vens

dow

n, g

iven

its

man

ufac

turin

g in

tere

sts

and

the

pres

ence

of i

ts fa

rmin

g sh

areh

olde

rs w

ithin

the

ca

tchm

ents

, ack

now

ledg

es t

hat

it is

impo

rtan

t th

at

good

dec

ision

s ar

e m

ade

in r

elat

ion

to re

sour

ce u

se

activ

ities

, in

cludi

ng

thro

ugh

the

use

of

Farm

En

viro

nmen

t Pl

ans

(FEP

) and

indu

stry

goo

d pr

actic

e pr

ogra

mm

es

(i.e.

, in

clud

ing

Good

M

anag

emen

t Pr

actic

es (G

MP)

in re

latio

n to

farm

ing

oper

atio

ns).

How

ever

, to

en

sure

te

rmin

olog

y co

nsist

ency

th

roug

hout

PPC

9, r

athe

r th

an r

efer

ring

to ‘

farm

m

anag

emen

t pl

ans’,

the

obj

ectiv

e sh

ould

ref

er t

o ‘F

arm

Env

ironm

ent P

lans

’ (FE

P). T

his i

s the

term

use

d th

roug

hout

PPC

9, in

cludi

ng in

Sch

edul

e 30

.

In

supp

ortin

g th

e co

ntin

ued

use

of

the

FEP

thro

ugho

ut P

PC9,

Rav

ensd

own

ackn

owle

dges

tha

t Pa

rt 9

A of

the

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Am

endm

ent

Act 2

020

(RM

AA),

and

the

regu

latio

n th

at is

to fo

llow

fro

m t

hese

pro

visio

ns o

f th

e RM

AA, u

ses

the

term

‘F

resh

wat

er F

arm

Pla

n’ (

FFP)

. A

cha

nge

to t

his

term

inol

ogy i

s not

bei

ng re

ques

ted

by R

aven

sdow

n as

FE

Ps a

re a

tool

cur

rent

ly u

sed

natio

nally

, and

in th

e ab

senc

e of

the

FFP

reg

ulat

ions

, it

is co

nsid

ered

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

1 as

follo

ws:

Th

e Co

uncil

, tan

gata

whe

nua

and

the

urba

n an

d ru

ral

com

mun

ity w

ork

toge

ther

in

a w

ay t

hat

reco

gnise

s th

e ka

itiak

i an

d gu

ardi

ansh

ip r

oles

th

ey e

ach

play

in fr

eshw

ater

man

agem

ent a

nd;

a) r

ecog

nise

th

e im

port

ance

of

m

onito

ring,

re

sour

ce

inve

stig

atio

ns

and

the

use

of

mat

aura

nga

Mao

ri to

info

rm d

ecisi

on m

akin

g an

d lim

it se

ttin

g fo

r sus

tain

able

man

agem

ent;

b)

ens

ure

good

lan

d an

d w

ater

man

agem

ent

prac

tices

are

fol

low

ed a

nd w

here

nec

essa

ry,

miti

gatio

n or

rest

orat

ion

mea

sure

s ado

pted

; c)

su

ppor

t go

od d

ecisi

on m

akin

g by

res

ourc

e us

ers

incl

udin

g ru

ral a

nd u

rban

com

mun

ities

th

roug

h m

arae

an

d ha

pū

initi

ativ

es,

com

mun

ity o

r oth

er c

atch

men

t man

agem

ent

prog

ram

mes

and

mon

itorin

g in

itiat

ives

, urb

an

stor

mw

ater

pr

ogra

mm

es,

land

owne

r co

llect

ives

, fa

rm m

anag

emen

t en

viro

nmen

t pl

ans a

nd in

dust

ry g

ood

prac

tice

prog

ram

mes

.

Page 86: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A2

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

poss

ible

that

a F

FP w

ould

pot

entia

lly fo

rm p

art o

f a

broa

der F

EP (i

.e.,

sect

ion

217F

of t

he R

MAA

iden

tifie

s th

e co

nten

t req

uire

men

ts fo

r FFP

).

2 O

BJ T

ANK

2 8

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

dire

ctio

n pr

ovid

ed w

ithin

th

is ob

ject

ive

as t

o th

e m

atte

rs t

o co

nsid

er w

hen

sett

ing

fresh

wat

er o

bjec

tives

, lim

its a

nd ta

rget

s.

How

ever

, Ra

vens

dow

n ha

s tw

o iss

ues

with

th

e no

tifie

d ob

ject

ive.

Fi

rstly

, pa

rt (

b) o

f th

e ob

ject

ive

is co

nfus

ing.

A

part

icula

r con

cern

is th

e re

quire

men

t for

‘con

tinuo

us

impr

ovem

ent’.

Whi

le

striv

ing

for

cont

inuo

us

impr

ovem

ent

may

be

desir

able

in

the

cont

ext

of

reso

urce

use

act

iviti

es, i

t is

not a

lway

s ac

hiev

able

or

even

nec

essa

ry fo

r suc

h ac

tiviti

es (e

.g.,

if th

e ef

fect

s of

a r

esou

rce

use

activ

ity a

re m

inor

or

are

not

signi

fican

t).

Ho

wev

er,

striv

ing

for

cont

inuo

us

impr

ovem

ent i

n th

e co

ntex

t of a

pla

n ob

ject

ive

is no

t an

app

ropr

iate

con

cept

. R

athe

r, th

e go

al,

or a

im,

whe

n se

ttin

g ob

ject

ives

, lim

its a

nd ta

rget

s sho

uld

be

the

long

-term

visi

on a

nd e

nviro

nmen

tal

outc

omes

be

ing

soug

ht. R

aven

sdow

n co

nsid

ers t

hat p

arts

(a) t

o (e

), su

bjec

t to

the

amen

dmen

t pro

pose

d, id

entif

y th

e en

viro

nmen

tal

outc

omes

to

be p

rovi

ded

for

whe

n se

ttin

g ob

ject

ives

, lim

its a

nd ta

rget

s.

Seco

ndly

, we

note

tha

t Sc

hedu

le 2

5, r

efer

red

to in

pa

rt (e

) of t

he o

bjec

tive,

is n

ot y

et o

pera

tive.

In

fact

, th

e fin

al fo

rm a

nd c

onte

nt o

f thi

s sch

edul

e is

not y

et

know

n as

hea

rings

hav

e no

t yet

bee

n he

ld in

rela

tion

to P

ropo

sed

Plan

Cha

nge

7 –

Out

stan

ding

Wat

er

Bodi

es.

In r

aisin

g th

is iss

ue, R

aven

sdow

n do

es n

ot

prop

ose

any

chan

ges

to p

art

(e)

of t

he o

bjec

tive.

Ra

ther

Ra

vens

dow

n ju

st

wish

es

to

note

, th

at

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

2 as

follo

ws:

W

hen

sett

ing

obje

ctiv

es, l

imits

and

targ

ets;

a)

Te

Man

a o

te W

ai a

nd in

tegr

ated

mou

ntai

ns

to th

e se

a, k

i uta

ki t

ai p

rinci

ples

are

uph

eld;

b)

A c

ontin

uous

im

prov

emen

t ap

proa

ch t

o th

e us

e an

d de

velo

pmen

t of n

atur

al re

sour

ces a

nd

tThe

pro

tect

ion

of i

ndig

enou

s bi

odiv

ersit

y is

adop

ted

and

the

colle

ctiv

e su

stai

nabl

e m

anag

emen

t of f

resh

wat

er is

ena

bled

; c)

Th

e ka

itiak

itang

a ro

le o

f tan

gata

whe

nua

and

thei

r wha

kapa

pa a

nd cu

ltura

l con

nect

ion

with

w

ater

are

reco

gnise

d an

d pr

ovid

ed fo

r; d)

The

re

spon

sibili

ties

of

peop

le

and

com

mun

ities

for s

usta

inab

le re

sour

ce u

se a

nd

deve

lopm

ent

is re

cogn

ised

and

supp

orte

d;

and

e) T

he

signi

fican

t va

lues

of

th

e ou

tsta

ndin

g w

ater

bod

ies i

n Sc

hedu

le 2

5 an

d th

e va

lues

in

the

plan

ob

ject

ives

ar

e ap

prop

riate

ly

prot

ecte

d an

d pr

ovid

ed fo

r.

Page 87: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A3

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

depe

ndin

g on

th

e fin

al

form

of

Sc

hedu

le

25,

chal

leng

es m

ay e

vent

uate

whe

n it

is ne

cess

ary t

o gi

ve

cons

ider

atio

n to

par

t (e)

of t

his o

bjec

tive.

Wat

er Q

ualit

y Ge

nera

l

3 O

BJ T

ANK

4 9

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

Rave

nsdo

wn

is su

ppor

tive

of t

he a

im o

f O

bjec

tive

TANK

4 to

mai

ntai

n w

ater

qua

lity,

and

to im

prov

e it

whe

re i

t is

degr

aded

, as

qua

ntifi

ed a

gain

st t

he

fresh

wat

er o

bjec

tives

con

tain

ed in

Sch

edul

e 26

. Ho

wev

er,

amen

dmen

ts a

re r

eque

sted

to

ensu

re

clarit

y ar

ound

wha

t the

obj

ectiv

e is

requ

iring

, and

to

ensu

re c

onsis

tenc

y of

wor

ding

with

Sch

edul

e 26

. In

th

is co

ntex

t, pa

rt (b

) of t

he o

bjec

tive

is un

nece

ssar

y as

the

pro

pose

d am

endm

ent

to p

art

(a)

clea

rly

iden

tifie

s the

requ

irem

ent t

o m

aint

ain

exist

ing

wat

er

qual

ity w

here

the

fre

shw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es i

n Sc

hedu

le 2

6 ar

e be

ing

achi

eved

.

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

4 as

follo

ws:

La

nd a

nd w

ater

use

, con

tam

inan

t disc

harg

e an

d nu

trie

nt lo

ss a

ctiv

ities

are

car

ried

out s

o th

at th

e qu

ality

of

th

e TA

NK

fresh

wat

er

bodi

es

is m

aint

aine

d w

here

th

e fre

shw

ater

qu

ality

ob

ject

ives

in S

ched

ule

26 a

re cu

rren

tly b

eing

met

, or

is im

prov

ed in

deg

rade

d w

ater

bodi

es s

o th

at

they

mee

t the

fres

hwat

er q

ualit

y at

trib

ute

stat

es

targ

ets i

n Sc

hedu

le 2

6 by

204

0, p

rovi

ded

that

: a)

For

an

y sp

ecifi

c w

ater

bo

dy

whe

re

the

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y at

trib

ute

stat

e is

foun

d to

be

hi

gher

th

an

the

fresh

wat

er

qual

ity

obje

ctiv

e th

at

give

n in

Sch

edul

e 26

, th

e ex

istin

g hi

gher

stat

e is

to b

e m

aint

aine

d; a

nd

b) M

aint

enan

ce o

f a

stat

e is

at t

he m

easu

red

stat

e.

4 O

BJ T

ANK

6 9

Opp

ose

Exce

pt fo

r its

inclu

sion

in th

is ob

ject

ive,

Sch

edul

e 27

, w

hich

iden

tifie

s po

tent

ial f

utur

e fre

shw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es,

play

s no

pol

icy o

r re

gula

tory

fun

ctio

n w

ithin

PPC

9. F

or th

is re

ason

, as s

tate

d in

Sub

. Ref

. 58,

Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers t

hat S

ched

ule

27 is

redu

ndan

t an

d sh

ould

be

dele

ted.

In

requ

estin

g th

e de

letio

n of

this

polic

y (an

d Sc

hedu

le

27),

Rave

nsdo

wn

ackn

owle

dges

that

Cou

ncil,

as

part

of

its r

equi

rem

ents

to im

plem

ent t

he N

atio

nal P

olicy

St

atem

ent

for

Fres

hwat

er M

anag

emen

t 20

20 (

NPS

-FM

202

0), m

ay se

t lon

g ter

m a

ttrib

ute

stat

es th

at m

ay

Dele

te O

BJ T

ANK

6 in

ent

irety

. Th

e qu

ality

of t

he T

ANK

fresh

wat

er b

odie

s set

out

in

Sch

edul

e 27

will

be

achi

eved

thr

ough

fut

ure

plan

cha

nges

.

Page 88: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A4

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

refle

ct t

he f

resh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

cur

rent

ly

cont

aine

d in

Sch

edul

e 27

. H

owev

er,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at t

he i

nclu

sion

of l

ong-

term

att

ribut

e st

ates

nee

ds t

o be

det

erm

ined

as

part

of a

bro

ader

Na

tiona

l Obj

ectiv

es F

ram

ewor

k (N

OF)

as

outli

ned

in

Subp

art 2

of t

he N

PS-F

M 2

020.

Fi

nally

, in

rel

atio

n to

thi

s ob

ject

ive,

the

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Ac

t 19

91 (

RMA)

req

uire

s th

e re

gula

r re

view

of

stat

utor

y pl

ans,

and

also

ena

bles

pla

n ch

ange

s to

be

notif

ied

at a

ny ti

me.

For

this

reas

on,

and

give

n th

e re

ques

ted

dele

tion

of S

ched

ule

27,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

th

at

this

obje

ctiv

e is

not

requ

ired.

5 O

BJ T

ANK

7 9

Supp

ort

Rave

nsdo

wn

is su

ppor

tive

of t

he i

nten

t of

thi

s ob

ject

ive

but

reco

mm

ends

an

amen

dmen

t to

the

w

ordi

ng to

ens

ure

that

the

inte

nt o

f thi

s ob

ject

ive

is cle

ar.

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

7 as

follo

ws:

La

nd u

se is

car

ried

out i

n a

man

ner t

hat r

educ

es

cont

amin

ant

loss

, in

clud

ing

soil

loss

an

d co

nseq

uent

ial

sedi

men

tatio

n,

into

fre

shw

ater

bo

dies

, est

uarie

s and

coa

stal

env

ironm

ent.

6 O

bjec

tive

9 (p

resu

mab

ly O

BJ

TANK

9)

9 Su

ppor

t Th

e pr

otec

tion

of a

reas

whe

re w

ater

is s

ourc

ed fo

r hu

man

con

sum

ptio

n is

impo

rtan

t. E

nsur

ing

that

po

tent

ial

risks

to

such

sup

plie

s ar

e m

anag

ed i

n a

man

ner

that

ens

ures

the

wat

er d

oes

not

beco

me

unsu

itabl

e fo

r hu

man

con

sum

ptio

n is

appr

opria

te.

For t

hese

reas

ons,

this

obje

ctiv

e is

supp

orte

d.

How

ever

, w

hile

su

ppor

ting

this

obje

ctiv

e,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at it

is im

port

ant

that

the

so

urce

are

as f

or s

uch

supp

lies,

and

thus

ass

ocia

ted

prot

ectio

n ar

eas,

are

appr

opria

tely

de

fined

an

d id

entif

ied

(i.e.

, th

e ar

ea o

f pr

otec

tion

need

s to

di

rect

ly re

late

to th

e so

urce

are

a).

If th

e pr

otec

tion

area

ext

ends

ove

r an

area

not

dire

ctly

ass

ocia

ted

with

Reta

in O

BJ T

ANK

9 as

not

ified

.

Page 89: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A5

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

the

wat

er s

uppl

y, t

hen

ther

e is

the

pote

ntia

l fo

r ac

tiviti

es to

be

unne

cess

arily

cons

trai

ned.

Catc

hmen

t Obj

ectiv

es

7 O

BJ T

ANK

10

9 Su

ppor

t in

part

Th

is Ah

uriri

spec

ific

obje

ctiv

e is

supp

orte

d as

it se

eks

to e

nsur

e th

at t

he m

auri,

wat

er q

ualit

y an

d w

ater

qu

antit

y in

th

e ca

tchm

ent

is m

aint

aine

d an

d en

hanc

ed.

Give

n th

e sig

nific

ance

of t

he e

stua

ry, t

his

is an

app

ropr

iate

reso

urce

man

agem

ent r

espo

nse.

W

hile

th

e ai

m

of

the

obje

ctiv

e is

supp

orte

d,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at

part

(e

) sh

ould

be

am

ende

d. W

ater

, whe

re it

is a

vaila

ble

in a

man

ner

that

doe

s no

t ad

vers

ely

affe

ct t

he s

usta

inab

ility

of

fresh

wat

er b

odie

s, is

used

for a

rang

e of

use

s, no

t jus

t pr

imar

y pr

oduc

tion,

to

pr

ovid

e fo

r so

cial

and

econ

omic

wel

l-bei

ng.

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

10 a

s fol

low

s:

In c

ombi

natio

n w

ith m

eetin

g th

e w

ater

qua

lity

stat

es s

pecif

ied

in S

ched

ule

26,

the

use

and

deve

lopm

ent

of

land

, th

e di

scha

rge

of

cont

amin

ants

and

nut

rient

s, an

d th

e ta

king

, usin

g da

mm

ing

and

dive

rtin

g of

fre

shw

ater

is c

arrie

d ou

t in

the

Ahur

iri fr

eshw

ater

cat

chm

ents

so

that

th

e m

auri,

wat

er q

ualit

y an

d w

ater

qua

ntity

are

m

aint

aine

d an

d en

hanc

ed w

here

nec

essa

ry t

o en

able

: a)

Ahu

riri e

stua

ry s

edim

ents

to

be h

ealth

y an

d no

t acc

umul

ate

exce

ssiv

ely;

b)

hea

lthy

ecos

yste

ms

that

con

trib

ute

to t

he

heal

th o

f the

est

uary

; c)

he

alth

y an

d di

vers

e in

dige

nous

aqu

atic

plan

t, fis

h an

d bi

rd p

opul

atio

ns;

d) P

eopl

e an

d co

mm

uniti

es t

o sa

fely

mee

t th

eir

dom

estic

wat

er n

eeds

; e)

Prim

ary

prod

uctio

n ac

cess

to

w

ater

fo

r co

mm

unity

socia

l and

eco

nom

ic w

ell-b

eing

; An

d pr

ovid

e fo

r; f)

Cont

ribut

ion

to th

e he

alth

y fu

nctio

ning

of t

he

Ahur

iri e

stua

ry e

cosy

stem

and

ena

ble

peop

le

to s

afel

y ca

rry

out

a w

ide

rang

e of

soc

ial,

cultu

ral

and

recr

eatio

nal

activ

ities

inc

ludi

ng

swim

min

g an

d th

e co

llect

ion

of m

ahin

ga ka

i in

the

estu

ary.

Page 90: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A6

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

8 O

BJ T

ANK

11

10

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

Sim

ilar t

o th

e ab

ove

com

men

t on

OBJ

TAN

K 10

(Sub

. Re

f. 7)

, thi

s ob

ject

ive

is su

ppor

ted

as it

is s

eeks

to

mai

ntai

n th

e m

auri,

wat

er q

ualit

y an

d w

ater

qua

ntity

of

the

river

in th

e up

per r

each

es, a

nd im

prov

e, w

here

ne

cess

ary,

thes

e at

trib

utes

in th

e lo

wer

rive

r. W

hile

th

e ai

m

of

the

obje

ctiv

e is

supp

orte

d,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at

part

(f)

sh

ould

be

am

ende

d. W

ater

, whe

re it

is a

vaila

ble

in a

man

ner

that

doe

s no

t ad

vers

ely

affe

ct t

he s

usta

inab

ility

of

fresh

wat

er b

odie

s, is

used

for

a r

ange

of

uses

in

cludi

ng fo

r ind

ustr

ial a

nd c

omm

ercia

l act

iviti

es, n

ot

just

prim

ary p

rodu

ctio

n or

urb

an a

ctiv

ities

, to

prov

ide

for s

ocia

l and

eco

nom

ic w

ell-b

eing

. In

requ

estin

g th

is ch

ange

, Ra

vens

dow

n no

tes

that

it

cons

ider

s th

at

“ass

ocia

ted

proc

essin

g” d

oes

not

prov

ide

for

all

indu

stria

l and

com

mer

cial a

ctiv

ities

tha

t m

ay o

ccur

w

ithin

the

catc

hmen

t.

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

11 a

s fol

low

s:

In c

ombi

natio

n w

ith m

eetin

g th

e w

ater

qua

lity

stat

es s

pecif

ied

in S

ched

ule

26,

the

use

and

deve

lopm

ent

of

land

, th

e di

scha

rge

of

cont

amin

ants

and

nut

rient

s, an

d th

e ta

king

, usin

g da

mm

ing

and

dive

rtin

g of

fre

shw

ater

is c

arrie

d ou

t in

the

Nga

ruro

ro R

iver

catc

hmen

t so

that

the

mau

ri, w

ater

qua

lity

and

wat

er q

uant

ity a

re

mai

ntai

ned

in

the

mai

nste

m

abov

e th

e W

hana

wha

na C

able

way

and

in

the

Taru

arau

Ri

ver,

and

are

impr

oved

in

the

trib

utar

ies

and

low

er re

ache

s whe

re n

eces

sary

to e

nabl

e;

a) H

ealth

y ec

osys

tem

s;

b) h

ealth

y an

d di

vers

e in

dige

nous

aqu

atic

plan

t, an

imal

an

d bi

rd

popu

latio

ns

espe

cially

w

hite

bait,

to

rren

t fis

h,

mac

roin

vert

ebra

te

com

mun

ities

, bi

rd h

abita

t on

bra

ided

riv

er

reac

hes a

nd a

hea

lthy

trou

t fish

ery;

c)

pe

ople

to

safe

ly c

arry

out

a w

ide

rang

e of

so

cial,

cultu

ral

and

recr

eatio

nal

activ

ities

es

pecia

lly s

wim

min

g an

d cu

ltura

l pra

ctice

s of

Uu

and

boa

ting,

incl

udin

g je

t-bo

atin

g in

the

br

aide

d re

ache

s of t

he N

garu

roro

; d)

pro

tect

ion

of t

he n

atur

al c

hara

cter

, ins

trea

m

valu

es a

nd h

ydro

logi

cal

func

tioni

ng o

f th

e Ng

arur

oro

mai

nste

m

and

Taru

arau

an

d Om

ahak

i trib

utar

ies;

e)

col

lect

ion

of m

ahin

ga k

ai to

pro

vide

for s

ocia

l an

d cu

ltura

l wel

l-bei

ng;

f)

peop

le a

nd c

omm

uniti

es t

o sa

fely

mee

t th

eir

dom

estic

wat

er n

eeds

;

Page 91: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A7

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

g) p

rimar

y pro

duct

ion,

indu

stria

l and

com

mer

cial

w

ater

nee

ds a

nd w

ater

requ

ired

for a

ssoc

iate

d pr

oces

sing

and

othe

r ur

ban

activ

ities

to

pr

ovid

e fo

r co

mm

unity

soc

ial

and

econ

omic

wel

l-bei

ng;

an

d pr

ovid

e fo

r;

h) c

ontr

ibut

ion

to w

ater

flow

s and

wat

er q

ualit

y in

the

conn

ecte

d He

reta

unga

Pla

ins A

quife

rs;

i) co

ntrib

utio

n to

the

hea

lthy

func

tioni

ng o

f W

aita

ngi

Estu

ary

ecos

yste

m a

nd t

o en

able

pe

ople

to

safe

ly c

arry

out

a w

ide

rang

e of

so

cial,

cultu

ral a

nd re

crea

tiona

l act

iviti

es a

nd

the

colle

ctio

n of

mah

inga

kai

in th

e es

tuar

y.

9 O

BJ T

ANK

12

10

Supp

ort

Sim

ilar t

o th

e ab

ove

com

men

ts o

n O

BJ T

ANK

10 a

nd

OBJ

TAN

K 11

(Su

b. R

efs.

7 a

nd 8

), th

is ob

ject

ive

is su

ppor

ted

as it

is se

eks t

o m

aint

ain

the

mau

ri, w

ater

qu

ality

and

wat

er q

uant

ity o

f the

riv

er in

the

upp

er

reac

hes,

and

impr

ove,

w

here

ne

cess

ary,

th

ese

attr

ibut

es in

the

low

er ri

ver.

Whi

le

the

aim

of

th

e ob

ject

ive

is su

ppor

ted,

Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

pa

rt

(g)

shou

ld

be

amen

ded.

Wat

er, w

here

it is

ava

ilabl

e in

a m

anne

r th

at d

oes

not

adve

rsel

y af

fect

the

sus

tain

abili

ty o

f fre

shw

ater

bod

ies,

is us

ed f

or a

ran

ge o

f us

es

inclu

ding

for i

ndus

tria

l and

com

mer

cial a

ctiv

ities

, not

ju

st p

rimar

y pro

duct

ion

or u

rban

act

iviti

es, t

o pr

ovid

e fo

r soc

ial a

nd e

cono

mic

wel

l-bei

ng.

In re

ques

ting

this

chan

ge,

Rave

nsdo

wn

note

s th

at i

t co

nsid

ers

that

“a

ssoc

iate

d pr

oces

sing”

doe

s no

t pr

ovid

e fo

r al

l in

dust

rial a

nd c

omm

ercia

l act

iviti

es t

hat

may

occ

ur

with

in th

e ca

tchm

ent.

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

12 a

s fol

low

s:

In c

ombi

natio

n w

ith m

eetin

g th

e w

ater

qua

lity

stat

es s

pecif

ied

in S

ched

ule

26,

the

use

and

deve

lopm

ent

of

land

, th

e di

scha

rge

of

cont

amin

ants

and

nut

rient

s, an

d th

e ta

king

, usin

g da

mm

ing

and

dive

rtin

g of

fre

shw

ater

is c

arrie

d ou

t in

the

Tūta

ekur

ī Riv

er c

atch

men

t so

that

the

mau

ri, w

ater

qua

lity

and

wat

er q

uant

ity a

re

mai

ntai

ned

in th

e up

per r

each

es o

f the

mai

nste

m

and

are

impr

oved

in

the

trib

utar

ies

and

low

er

reac

hes w

here

nec

essa

ry to

ena

ble:

a)

hea

lthy

ecos

yste

ms;

b)

hea

lthy

and

dive

rse

indi

geno

us a

quat

ic an

d bi

rd p

opul

atio

ns e

spec

ially

, whi

teba

it, to

rren

t fis

h, m

acro

inve

rteb

rate

com

mun

ities

and

a

heal

thy

trou

t fish

ery;

c)

pe

ople

to

safe

ly c

arry

out

a w

ide

rang

e of

so

cial,

cultu

ral

and

recr

eatio

nal

activ

ities

,

Page 92: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A8

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

espe

cially

sw

imm

ing

and

cultu

ral p

ract

ices

of

Uu a

nd b

oatin

g;

d) p

rote

ctio

n of

the

nat

ural

cha

ract

er, i

nstr

eam

va

lues

and

hyd

rolo

gica

l fu

nctio

ning

of

the

Tūta

ekur

ī mai

nste

m a

nd M

anga

tutu

trib

utar

y;

e)

colle

ctio

n of

mah

inga

kai

to p

rovi

de fo

r soc

ial

and

cultu

ral w

ell-b

eing

; f)

peop

le a

nd c

omm

uniti

es t

o sa

fely

mee

t th

eir

dom

estic

wat

er n

eeds

;

g) p

rimar

y pro

duct

ion,

indu

stria

l and

com

mer

cial

w

ater

nee

ds a

nd w

ater

requ

ired

for a

ssoc

iate

d pr

oces

sing

and

othe

r ur

ban

activ

ities

to

pr

ovid

e fo

r co

mm

unity

soc

ial

and

econ

omic

wel

l-bei

ng;

and

prov

ide

for;

h)

con

trib

utio

n to

the

hea

lthy

func

tioni

ng o

f W

aita

ngi

Estu

ary

ecos

yste

m a

nd t

o en

able

pe

ople

to

safe

ly c

arry

out

a w

ide

rang

e of

so

cial,

cultu

ral a

nd re

crea

tiona

l act

iviti

es a

nd

the

colle

ctio

n of

mah

inga

kai

in th

e es

tuar

y.

10

OBJ

TAN

K 13

11

Su

ppor

t in

part

Si

mila

r to

the

abo

ve c

omm

ents

on

OBJ

TAN

K 10

to

OBJ

TAN

K 12

(Su

b. R

efs.

7 t

o 9)

, th

is ob

ject

ive

is su

ppor

ted

as it

is se

eks t

o m

aint

ain

and

impr

ove

the

mau

ri, w

ater

qua

lity

and

wat

er q

uant

ity o

f the

se tw

o riv

er ca

tchm

ents

. W

hile

th

e ai

m

of

the

obje

ctiv

e is

supp

orte

d,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at

part

(f)

sh

ould

be

am

ende

d. W

ater

, whe

re it

is a

vaila

ble

in a

man

ner

that

doe

s no

t ad

vers

ely

affe

ct t

he s

usta

inab

ility

of

fresh

wat

er b

odie

s, is

used

for

a r

ange

of

uses

in

cludi

ng fo

r ind

ustr

ial a

nd c

omm

ercia

l act

iviti

es, n

ot

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

13 a

s fol

low

s:

In c

ombi

natio

n w

ith m

eetin

g th

e w

ater

qua

lity

stat

es s

pecif

ied

in S

ched

ule

26,

the

uses

and

de

velo

pmen

t of

la

nd,

the

disc

harg

e of

co

ntam

inan

ts a

nd n

utrie

nts,

and

the

taki

ng, u

sing

dam

min

g an

d di

vert

ing

of f

resh

wat

er is

car

ried

out i

n th

e Ka

ram

ū an

d Cl

ive

Rive

rs c

atch

men

t so

that

the

mau

ri, w

ater

qua

lity

and

wat

er q

uant

ity

are

impr

oved

to e

nabl

e;

a) h

ealth

y ec

osys

tem

s;

b) h

ealth

y an

d di

vers

e in

dige

nous

aqu

atic

and

Page 93: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A9

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

just

prim

ary p

rodu

ctio

n or

urb

an a

ctiv

ities

, to

prov

ide

for s

ocia

l and

eco

nom

ic w

ell-b

eing

. In

requ

estin

g th

is ch

ange

, Ra

vens

dow

n no

tes

that

it

cons

ider

s th

at

“ass

ocia

ted

proc

essin

g” d

oes

not

prov

ide

for

all

indu

stria

l and

com

mer

cial a

ctiv

ities

tha

t m

ay o

ccur

w

ithin

the

catc

hmen

t.

bird

pop

ulat

ions

, esp

ecia

lly b

lack

pat

iki,

tuna

an

d w

hite

bait,

and

hea

lthy m

acro

inve

rteb

rate

co

mm

uniti

es;

c) p

eopl

e to

saf

ely

carr

y ou

t a

wid

e ra

nge

of

socia

l, re

crea

tiona

l, an

d cu

ltura

l ac

tiviti

es,

incl

udin

g sw

imm

ing

and

cultu

ral p

ract

ices

of

Uu

and

row

ing

and

wak

a am

a in

th

e Cl

ive/

Kara

mu;

d)

col

lect

ion

of m

ahin

ga k

ai to

pro

vide

for s

ocia

l an

d cu

ltura

l wel

l-bei

ng;

e) p

eopl

e an

d co

mm

uniti

es t

o sa

fely

mee

t th

eir

dom

estic

wat

er n

eeds

; f)

prim

ary p

rodu

ctio

n, in

dust

rial a

nd co

mm

erci

al

wat

er n

eeds

and

wat

er re

quire

d fo

r ass

ocia

ted

proc

essin

g an

d ot

her

urba

n ac

tiviti

es

to

prov

ide

for

com

mun

ity s

ocia

l an

d ec

onom

ic w

ell-b

eing

; an

d pr

ovid

e fo

r; g)

con

trib

utio

n to

the

heal

thy

func

tioni

ng o

f the

W

aita

ngi

Estu

ary

ecos

yste

m a

nd t

o en

able

pe

ople

to

safe

ly c

arry

out

a w

ide

rang

e of

so

cial,

cultu

ral a

nd re

crea

tiona

l act

iviti

es a

nd

the

colle

ctio

n of

mah

inga

kai

in th

e es

tuar

y.

11

OBJ

TAN

K 14

11

Su

ppor

t in

part

Si

mila

r to

the

abo

ve c

omm

ents

on

OBJ

TAN

K 10

to

OBJ

TAN

K 13

(Su

b. R

efs.

7 t

o 10

), th

is ob

ject

ive

is su

ppor

ted

as it

is se

eks t

o m

aint

ain

and

impr

ove

the

mau

ri,

wat

er

qual

ity,

wat

er

quan

tity

and

grou

ndw

ater

leve

ls ar

e m

aint

aine

d in

gro

undw

ater

w

here

co

nnec

ted

to

Ngar

uror

o,

Tūta

ekur

ī an

d Ka

ram

ū riv

ers a

nd th

eir t

ribut

arie

s.

Whi

le

the

aim

of

th

e ob

ject

ive

is su

ppor

ted,

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

14 a

s fol

low

s:

In c

ombi

natio

n w

ith m

eetin

g th

e w

ater

qua

lity

stat

es s

pecif

ied

in S

ched

ule

26,

the

use

and

deve

lopm

ent

of

land

, th

e di

scha

rge

of

cont

amin

ants

and

nut

rient

s, an

d th

e ta

king

and

us

ing

of f

resh

wat

er i

s ca

rrie

d ou

t so

tha

t th

e m

auri,

w

ater

qu

ality

, w

ater

qu

antit

y an

d gr

ound

wat

er

leve

ls ar

e m

aint

aine

d in

th

e

Page 94: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A10

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at

part

(b

) sh

ould

be

am

ende

d. W

ater

, whe

re it

is a

vaila

ble

in a

man

ner

that

doe

s no

t ad

vers

ely

affe

ct t

he s

usta

inab

ility

of

fresh

wat

er b

odie

s, is

used

for

a r

ange

of

uses

in

cludi

ng fo

r ind

ustr

ial a

nd c

omm

ercia

l act

iviti

es, n

ot

just

prim

ary p

rodu

ctio

n or

urb

an a

ctiv

ities

, to

prov

ide

for s

ocia

l and

eco

nom

ic w

ell-b

eing

. In

requ

estin

g th

is ch

ange

, Ra

vens

dow

n no

tes

that

it

cons

ider

s th

at

“ass

ocia

ted

proc

essin

g” d

oes

not

prov

ide

for

all

indu

stria

l and

com

mer

cial a

ctiv

ities

tha

t m

ay o

ccur

w

ithin

the

catc

hmen

t

Grou

ndw

ater

co

nnec

ted

to

the

Ngar

uror

o,

Tūta

ekur

ī and

Kar

amū

river

s and

thei

r trib

utar

ies

to e

nabl

e;

a) p

eopl

e an

d co

mm

uniti

es t

o sa

fely

mee

t th

eir

dom

estic

wat

er n

eeds

and

to

enab

le t

he

prov

ision

of s

afe

and

secu

re su

pplie

s of w

ater

fo

r mun

icipa

l use

; b)

prim

ary p

rodu

ctio

n, in

dust

rial a

nd co

mm

erci

al

wat

er n

eeds

and

wat

er re

quire

d fo

r ass

ocia

ted

proc

essin

g an

d ot

her

urba

n ac

tiviti

es

to

prov

ide

for

com

mun

ity s

ocia

l an

d ec

onom

ic w

ell-b

eing

; an

d pr

ovid

e fo

r;

c)

the

mai

nten

ance

of g

roun

dwat

er le

vels

at a

n eq

uilib

rium

that

acc

ount

s for

ann

ual v

aria

tion

in c

limat

e an

d pr

even

ts lo

ng t

erm

dec

line

or

seaw

ater

intr

usio

n;

d) c

ontr

ibut

ion

to w

ater

flow

s and

wat

er q

ualit

y in

conn

ecte

d su

rface

wat

erbo

dies

.

12

OBJ

TAN

K 15

11

Su

ppor

t Ra

vens

dow

n is

supp

ortiv

e of

the

int

ent

of t

his

obje

ctiv

e to

man

age

activ

ities

in th

e TA

NK ca

tchm

ent,

whe

re c

onne

cted

to

the

‘Wet

land

and

lak

e w

aahi

ta

onga

’, to

ens

ure

that

mau

ri, w

ater

qua

lity,

flo

ws

and

leve

ls in

thes

e fre

shw

ater

bod

ies a

re m

aint

aine

d an

d im

prov

ed.

Reta

in O

BJ T

ANK

15 a

s not

ified

. In

com

bina

tion

with

mee

ting

the

wat

er q

ualit

y st

ates

spe

cifie

d in

Sch

edul

e 26

, th

e us

e an

d de

velo

pmen

t of

la

nd,

the

disc

harg

e of

co

ntam

inan

ts a

nd n

utrie

nts,

and

the

taki

ng, u

sing

dam

min

g an

d di

vert

ing

of fr

eshw

ater

con

nect

ed

to th

e W

etla

nd a

nd la

ke w

aahi

taon

ga w

ithin

the

TANK

cat

chm

ents

is

man

aged

so

that

mau

ri,

wat

er

qual

ity

and

flow

s, an

d le

vels

are

mai

ntai

ned

and

impr

oved

to e

nabl

e;

a) h

ealth

y an

d di

vers

e in

dige

nous

fish

, bird

and

pl

ant

popu

latio

ns in

wet

land

and

lake

are

as

Page 95: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A11

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

and

conn

ecte

d w

ater

way

s;

b) i

mpr

oved

hyd

rolo

gica

l fun

ctio

ning

in w

etla

nd

and

lake

s and

in co

nnec

ted

wat

erw

ays;

c)

pe

ople

to

safe

ly c

arry

out

a w

ide

rang

e of

so

cial a

nd c

ultu

ral a

ctiv

ities

; d)

col

lect

ion

of m

ahin

ga k

ai to

pro

vide

for s

ocia

l an

d cu

ltura

l wel

l-bei

ng;

e)

con

trib

utio

n to

im

prov

ed w

ater

qua

lity

in

conn

ecte

d su

rface

wat

ers;

f)

the

prot

ectio

n of

the

outs

tand

ing

valu

es o

f the

Ka

wek

a La

kes,

Lake

Pou

kaw

a an

d Pe

kape

ka

Swam

p an

d th

e Ng

amat

ea E

ast S

wam

p;

And

to;

g)

inc

reas

e th

e to

tal w

etla

nd a

rea

by p

rote

ctin

g an

d re

stor

ing

200h

a he

ctar

es

of

exist

ing

wet

land

and

rein

stat

ing

or c

reat

ing

100h

a of

ad

ditio

nal w

etla

nd b

y 20

40.

Wat

er q

uant

ity

13

OBJ

TAN

K 16

12

Su

ppor

t in

part

Ra

vens

dow

n, g

iven

its

area

of i

nter

est,

supp

orts

this

obje

ctiv

e an

d th

e pr

opos

ed

prio

rity

orde

r, in

pa

rticu

lar t

he p

riorit

y acc

orde

d to

prim

ary p

rodu

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es a

nd in

dust

rial w

ater

use

rs.

How

ever

, w

hile

su

ppor

ting

the

obje

ctiv

e,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at a

ll pr

imar

y pr

oduc

tion

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed fo

r in

the

prio

rity

orde

r, no

t jus

t pr

imar

y pr

oduc

tion

on v

ersa

tile

soils

. Ac

cord

ingl

y,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at p

art (

c) o

f the

obj

ectiv

e sh

ould

be

amen

ded

by r

emov

ing

the

refe

renc

e to

ve

rsat

ile so

ils.

Amen

d O

BJ T

ANK

16 a

s fol

low

s:

Subj

ect

to

limits

, ta

rget

s an

d flo

w

regi

mes

es

tabl

ished

to m

eet t

he n

eeds

of t

he va

lues

for t

he

wat

er

body

, w

ater

qu

antit

y al

loca

tion

man

agem

ent

and

proc

esse

s en

sure

w

ater

al

loca

tion

in th

e fo

llow

ing

prio

rity

orde

r, a)

Wat

er fo

r the

ess

entia

l nee

ds o

f peo

ple;

b)

The

allo

catio

n an

d re

serv

atio

n of

wat

er f

or

dom

estic

su

pply

in

clud

ing

for

mar

ae

and

papa

kāin

ga, a

nd fo

r mun

icipa

l sup

ply

so th

at

exist

ing

and

futu

re d

eman

d as

des

crib

ed i

n HP

UDS

(201

7) c

an b

e m

et w

ithin

he

spec

ified

Page 96: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A12

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

limits

; c)

Pr

imar

y pr

oduc

tion

on v

ersa

tile

soils

; d)

Oth

er p

rimar

y pr

oduc

tion

food

pro

cess

ing,

in

dust

rial a

nd c

omm

erci

al e

nd u

ses;

e)

Oth

er n

on-c

omm

ercia

l end

use

s.

14

OBJ

TAN

K 17

12

Su

ppor

t Th

is ob

ject

ive

is su

ppor

ted

as it

out

lines

a r

ange

of

cons

ider

atio

ns t

hat

are

to b

e ac

com

mod

ated

whe

n es

tabl

ishin

g a

reso

urce

man

agem

ent

regi

me

for

the

allo

catio

n an

d us

e of

wat

er r

esou

rces

in t

he T

ANK

catc

hmen

ts.

This

inclu

des

requ

iring

effi

cient

wat

er

use

and

ensu

ring

that

allo

catio

n re

gim

es a

re fl

exib

le

and

resp

onsiv

e to

wat

er u

ser’s

nee

ds.

Reta

in O

BJ T

ANK

17 a

s not

ified

.

15

OBJ

TAN

K 18

12

Su

ppor

t Ra

vens

dow

n su

ppor

ts th

is ob

ject

ive,

whi

ch fo

cuss

es

on e

nsur

ing

that

the

need

s of

futu

re g

ener

atio

ns, a

s w

ell a

s th

e m

auri

and

ecos

yste

m h

ealth

is s

ecur

ed.

The

obje

ctiv

e id

entif

ies

a ra

nge

of a

ppro

pria

te to

ols

to b

e us

ed t

o ac

hiev

e th

is, in

con

junc

tion

with

the

ob

ject

ive

fram

ewor

k as

a w

hole

, inc

ludi

ng, b

ut n

ot

limite

d to

, wat

er c

onse

rvat

ion,

effi

cient

wat

er u

se,

tech

nolo

gy in

nova

tion

and

the

prov

ision

s of

flex

ible

w

ater

allo

catio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t reg

imes

.

Reta

in O

BJ T

ANK

18 a

s not

ified

.

Sect

ion

5.10

.2 –

Pol

icie

s: S

urfa

ce W

ater

and

Gro

undw

ater

Qua

lity

Man

agem

ent

Prio

rity

Man

agem

ent A

ppro

ach

16

Polic

y 1

13

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

Rave

nsdo

wn,

as

outli

ned

in th

is po

licy,

is in

sup

port

of

Cou

ncil

wor

king

with

oth

er g

roup

s, t

houg

h bo

th

regu

lato

ry a

nd n

on-re

gula

tory

met

hods

, to

ens

ure

that

w

ater

qu

ality

at

trib

utes

ar

e m

aint

aine

d or

im

prov

ed w

here

wat

er q

ualit

y ta

rget

s ar

e no

t bei

ng

met

.

Whi

le t

he p

olicy

is

supp

orte

d, R

aven

sdow

n se

eks

Amen

d Po

licy

1 as

follo

ws:

Th

e Co

uncil

with

lan

dow

ners

, lo

cal

auth

oriti

es,

indu

stry

and

com

mun

ity g

roup

s, m

ana

whe

nua

and

othe

r st

akeh

olde

rs w

ill r

egul

ate

or m

anag

e la

nd u

se a

ctiv

ities

and

sur

face

and

gro

undw

ater

bo

dies

so

that

wat

er q

ualit

y at

trib

utes

obj

ectiv

es

are

mai

ntai

ned

at t

heir

curr

ent

stat

e or

whe

re

Page 97: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A13

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

seve

ral a

men

dmen

ts to

this

polic

y in

ord

er to

ens

ure

cons

isten

cy o

f ter

min

olog

y an

d to

also

pro

vide

clar

ity

(i.e.

, PP

C9 u

ses

the

term

obj

ectiv

e, r

athe

r th

an

attr

ibut

e in

rela

tion

to w

ater

qua

lity)

. In

addi

tion,

the

follo

win

g am

endm

ents

are

also

soug

ht:

in

par

t (b

), am

endm

ents

are

pro

pose

d as

it

is co

nsid

ered

tha

t re

fere

nce

to s

pecif

ic po

tent

ial

cont

amin

ants

is n

ot re

quire

d;

in

par

t (e)

, am

endm

ents

are

pro

pose

d to

ref

lect

th

e fa

ct

that

PP

C9

also

m

anag

es

othe

r st

orm

wat

er so

urce

s out

side

of u

rban

stor

mw

ater

; an

d

in p

art (

f), th

e in

clus

ion

of ‘o

ther

wat

er u

sers

’ is

requ

este

d as

a r

ange

of

othe

r w

ater

use

rs,

for

exam

ple

food

pro

duct

ion

indu

strie

s, a

lso re

quire

ac

cess

to sa

fe w

ater

supp

lies.

Fi

nally

, as

outli

ned

in S

ub. R

ef. 5

9 be

low

, it i

s no

ted

that

Rav

ensd

own

has

requ

este

d th

at S

ched

ule

28 is

am

ende

d to

clea

rly id

entif

y th

e pr

iorit

y ca

tchm

ents

.

requ

ired

show

an

impr

ovin

g tr

end

tow

ards

the

w

ater

qua

lity

targ

ets

show

n in

Sch

edul

e 26

by

focu

ssin

g on

: a)

wat

er q

ualit

y im

prov

emen

t in

su

b-pr

iorit

y ca

tchm

ents

(as

des

crib

ed i

n Sc

hedu

le 2

8)

whe

re w

ater

qua

lity

is no

t m

eetin

g sp

ecifi

ed

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ta

rget

s;

b) s

edim

ent

man

agem

ent

to a

ddre

ss a

s a

key

cont

amin

ant

path

way

s to

al

so

addr

ess

phos

phor

us a

nd b

acte

ria lo

sses

; c)

th

e sig

nific

ant

envi

ronm

enta

l st

ress

ors

of

exce

ssiv

e se

dim

enta

tion

and

mac

roph

yte

grow

th i

n lo

wla

nd r

iver

s an

d nu

trie

nt l

oads

en

terin

g th

e Ah

uriri

and

Wai

tang

i est

uarie

s;

d) t

he m

anag

emen

t of r

ipar

ian

mar

gins

; e)

the

m

anag

emen

t of

ur

ban

stor

mw

ater

ne

twor

ks a

nd t

he r

educ

tion

of c

onta

min

ants

in

urb

an s

torm

wat

er a

nd o

ther

sto

rmw

ater

so

urce

s;

f) th

e pr

otec

tion

of w

ater

qua

lity

for

dom

estic

an

d m

unici

pal w

ater

sup

ply

and

othe

r w

ater

us

ers.

17

Polic

y 4

13

Supp

ort

This

polic

y is

of in

tere

st to

Rav

ensd

own

as it

s Nap

ier

Wor

ks i

s lo

cate

d w

ithin

the

low

er N

garu

roro

and

Tū

taek

uri c

atch

men

t.

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

aim

of t

his p

olicy

, inc

ludi

ng

the

regu

lato

ry

and

non-

regu

lato

ry

man

agem

ent

appr

oach

es o

utlin

ed in

par

t (a)

to (c

).

Reta

in P

olicy

4 a

s not

ified

.

18

Polic

y 5

14

Supp

ort

This

polic

y is

of in

tere

st to

Rav

ensd

own

as it

s Sev

ern

Stre

et st

ore

is lo

cate

d in

the

Ahur

iri ca

tchm

ent.

Am

end

Polic

y 5

as fo

llow

s:

Page 98: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A14

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

This

polic

y ai

ms

to im

prov

e th

e he

alth

of t

he A

hurir

i Es

tuar

y, a

nd it

s tr

ibut

arie

s, b

y re

ducin

g co

ntam

inan

t di

scha

rges

int

o th

e tr

ibut

arie

s th

at f

low

int

o th

e es

tuar

y, i

nclu

ding

req

uirin

g th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of

appr

opria

te si

te m

anag

emen

t pra

ctice

s (pa

rt (c

)) an

d th

e ne

ed t

o fu

rthe

r in

vest

igat

e ho

w t

he e

stua

ry

func

tions

(par

t (d)

). R

aven

sdow

n su

ppor

ts th

e in

tent

of

th

is po

licy,

bu

t se

eks

a m

inor

gr

amm

atica

l am

endm

ent t

o pa

rt (a

) of t

he p

olicy

.

In

the

trib

utar

ies

of

the

Ahur

iri

Estu

ary,

in

ad

ditio

n to

Pol

icy 1

the

Cou

ncil

will

wor

k w

ith

man

a w

henu

a, la

ndow

ners

and

the

Nap

ier

City

Co

uncil

to:

a) i

mpr

ove

wat

er c

larit

y an

d re

duce

dep

osite

d se

dim

ent

by

redu

cein

g th

e am

ount

of

se

dim

ent b

eing

lost

from

land

and

rive

r ban

ks;

b) r

educ

e ris

k of

pr

olife

ratio

n of

al

gae

by

redu

cing

nutr

ient

loss

es f

rom

land

, inc

ludi

ng

thro

ugh

man

agem

ent

of p

hosp

horo

us l

oss

asso

ciate

d w

ith se

dim

ent;

c)

im

prov

e st

orm

wat

er

and

drai

nage

w

ater

qu

ality

and

the

eco

syst

em h

ealth

of

urba

n w

ater

way

s an

d re

duce

co

ntam

inat

ion

of

stor

mw

ater

as

socia

ted

with

po

or

site

man

agem

ent p

ract

ices,

spill

s an

d ac

cide

nt in

ur

ban

area

s;

d) c

arry

out

furt

her i

nves

tigat

ions

to u

nder

stan

d th

e es

tuar

y hy

drol

ogy,

fu

nctio

ning

an

d en

viro

nmen

tal s

tres

sors

.

Prot

ectio

n of

Sou

rce

Wat

er

19

Polic

y 6

14

Supp

ort

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

aim

of t

his p

olicy

to p

rote

ct

the

qual

ity a

nd q

uant

ity o

f reg

ister

ed d

rinki

ng w

ater

su

pplie

s, in

cludi

ng th

roug

h th

e id

entif

icatio

n an

d us

e of

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

nes.

It

is no

ted

that

Rav

ensd

own’

s Nap

ier W

orks

is lo

cate

d in

the

pro

pose

d Aw

otot

o W

ater

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

ne (

Map

2 –

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

nes

of P

PC9,

w

hich

is

not

a ‘p

lann

ing

map

’).

Ther

efor

e, w

hile

su

ppor

ting

this

polic

y, a

s out

lined

abo

ve in

rela

tion

to

OBJ

TAN

K 9

and

‘Map

2 –

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

ne’

Reta

in P

olicy

6 a

s not

ified

.

Page 99: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A15

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

(Sub

. Ref

s. 6

and

67)

, Rav

ensd

own

cons

ider

s tha

t it i

s im

port

ant

that

the

ext

ent

of t

he S

ourc

e Pr

otec

tion

Zone

ref

lect

s th

e ar

ea r

equi

red

to p

rote

ctio

n th

e Na

pier

drin

king

wat

er su

pply

. Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

if t

he e

xten

t of

the

zon

e is

larg

er t

han

wha

t is

requ

ired

to a

chie

ve th

e pu

rpos

e of

this

polic

y, th

en a

ra

nge

of a

ctiv

ities

of a

ppro

pria

tely

loca

ted

activ

ities

(i.

e.,

activ

ities

in

Indu

stria

l Zo

nes)

, in

cludi

ng t

he

Napi

er W

orks

, may

be

unne

cess

arily

con

stra

ined

by

the

pres

ence

of t

he S

ourc

e Pr

otec

tion

Zone

.

Give

n th

e ab

ove

pote

ntia

l iss

ue, i

t is

note

d th

at th

e se

ctio

n 32

Rep

ort

(p.2

52 o

f th

e se

ctio

n 32

Rep

ort)

stat

es th

at th

e So

urce

Pro

tect

ion

Zone

s fo

r Na

pier

’s w

ater

sup

ply

is pr

ovisi

onal

, and

tha

t th

e m

odel

ling

wor

k to

app

ropr

iate

ly d

efin

e th

e ex

tent

of t

he z

one

may

be

com

plet

ed i

n tim

e to

ena

ble

a te

chni

cal

subm

issio

n on

PC9

. If

this

is no

t th

e ca

se, t

hen

the

sect

ion

32 R

epor

t also

iden

tifie

s tha

t the

ext

ent o

f the

So

urce

Pro

tect

ion

Zone

s w

ill b

e re

fined

as

new

in

form

atio

n co

mes

to

ha

nd,

as

antic

ipat

ed

and

prov

ided

for

by

Sche

dule

35

(Sub

. Re

f. 65

bel

ow)

(p.2

53 o

f the

sect

ion

32 R

epor

t). G

iven

thes

e iss

ues,

Rave

nsdo

wn

has

subm

itted

on

the

Napi

er S

ourc

e Pr

otec

tion

Zone

map

(Map

2 –

Sub

. Ref

. 67

belo

w)

requ

estin

g th

at

the

exte

nt

of

the

zone

is

appr

opria

tely

ide

ntifi

ed o

n th

e m

aps,

base

d on

re

leva

nt t

echn

ical

info

rmat

ion

and

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith th

is po

licy.

Man

agin

g po

int s

ourc

e di

scha

rges

20

Polic

y 10

15

Su

ppor

t Ra

vens

dow

n is

supp

ortiv

e of

the

aim

of t

his p

olicy

to

man

age

poin

t so

urce

disc

harg

es w

ithin

the

TAN

K ca

tchm

ents

in

a

man

ner

that

en

sure

s th

at

the

Amen

d Po

licy

10 a

s fol

low

s:

Page 100: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A16

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

in

Sche

dule

26

are

achi

eved

. Th

is in

clude

s, as

out

lined

in p

art (

c) o

f the

po

licy,

the

req

uire

men

t fo

r ex

istin

g ac

tiviti

es t

o id

entif

y an

d im

plem

ent

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res,

whe

re

nece

ssar

y, t

o co

ntrib

ute

to m

eetin

g th

e fre

shw

ater

qu

ality

obj

ectiv

es.

How

ever

, an

am

endm

ent

is re

ques

ted

to e

nsur

e co

nsist

ency

of

w

ordi

ng

with

Sc

hedu

le

26

(i.e.

, ‘fr

eshw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es’,

rath

er t

han

‘wat

er

qual

ity o

bjec

tives

’).

The

Coun

cil w

ill m

anag

e po

int s

ourc

e di

scha

rges

(th

at a

re n

ot st

orm

wat

er d

ischa

rges

) so

that

afte

r re

ason

able

m

ixin

g,

cont

amin

ants

di

scha

rged

ei

ther

by

them

selv

es o

r in

com

bina

tion

with

oth

er

disc

harg

es d

o no

t cau

se th

e ob

ject

ives

for w

ater

qu

ality

in S

ched

ule

26 to

be

exce

eded

and

whe

n co

nsid

erin

g ap

plica

tions

to

di

scha

rge

cont

amin

ants

will

take

into

acc

ount

: a)

mea

sure

men

t un

cert

aint

ies

asso

ciate

d w

ith

varia

bles

suc

h as

loc

atio

n, f

low

s, se

ason

al

varia

tion

and

clim

atic

eve

nts;

b)

the

deg

ree

to w

hich

a d

ischa

rge

is of

a

tem

pora

ry

natu

re,

or

is as

socia

ted

with

ne

cess

ary

mai

nten

ance

wor

k.

c)

whe

n it

is an

exi

stin

g ac

tivity

, ide

ntifi

catio

n of

th

e m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s, w

here

nec

essa

ry,

and

timef

ram

es

for

thei

r ad

optio

n th

at

cont

ribut

e to

th

e m

eetin

g of

fre

shw

ater

qu

ality

obj

ectiv

es.

Sect

ion

5.10

.3 –

Pol

icies

: Man

agin

g Ad

vers

e Ef

fect

s fro

m La

nd U

se o

n W

ater

Qua

lity

(Diff

use

Disc

harg

es)

Adap

tive

Appr

oach

to N

utrie

nt a

nd C

onta

min

ant M

anag

emen

t

21

Polic

y 17

18

Su

ppor

t in

part

Ra

vens

dow

n is

supp

ortiv

e of

the

req

uire

men

t, as

re

flect

ed in

this

polic

y, fo

r tho

se w

ho u

se la

nd w

ithin

th

e TA

NK c

atch

men

t are

as to

man

age

nutr

ient

s an

d co

ntam

inan

ts

thro

ugh

the

prop

osed

ad

aptiv

e ap

proa

ch,

in o

rder

to

achi

eve

the

Sche

dule

26

fresh

wat

er

qual

ity

obje

ctiv

es.

In

part

icula

r, Ra

vens

dow

n su

ppor

ts,

in

conj

unct

ion

with

th

e re

gula

tory

fra

mew

ork

inclu

ded

in P

PC9,

the

use

of

FEPs

, or

‘p

rogr

amm

es’

prep

ared

by

ca

tchm

ent

colle

ctiv

es o

r in

dust

ry t

o ad

opt

and

impl

emen

t th

e

Amen

d Po

licy

17 a

s fol

low

s:

The

Coun

cil

will

ac

hiev

e or

m

aint

ain

the

fresh

wat

er t

arge

ts o

r fre

shw

ater

obj

ectiv

es i

n Sc

hedu

le 2

6 w

ith l

ando

wne

rs,

indu

stry

gro

ups,

and

othe

r st

akeh

olde

rs a

nd w

ill i

mpl

emen

t th

e fo

llow

ing

mea

sure

s;

a) e

stab

lish

prog

ram

mes

and

pro

cess

es th

roug

h Fa

rm

Envi

ronm

ent

Plan

s, Ca

tchm

ent

Page 101: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A17

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

requ

irem

ents

out

lined

in

part

s (a

)(i)

to (

iv)

of t

he

polic

y.

Whi

le

supp

ortin

g th

e pr

opos

ed

Catc

hmen

t Co

llect

ives

and

Indu

stry

Pro

gram

mes

as

two

of t

he

thre

e pa

thw

ays p

rovi

ded

for f

arm

ing

activ

ities

with

in

PPC9

, fro

m e

xper

ienc

e in

oth

er re

gion

s, Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

it is

pos

sible

tha

t th

e us

e of

FEP

s by

in

divi

dual

far

mer

s m

ay b

e th

e pr

efer

red

appr

oach

. Th

e im

pend

ing

requ

irem

ent f

or fa

rmin

g ac

tiviti

es to

ha

ve in

pla

ce F

FP, u

nder

the

upc

omin

g re

gula

tions

un

der t

he R

MAA

, may

also

be

a dr

iver

for i

ndiv

idua

l FE

Ps.

How

ever

, it i

s co

nsid

ered

that

the

refe

renc

e, in

par

t (a

)(iv)

of t

he p

olic

y, to

‘nut

rient

man

agem

ent p

lans

’ is

unne

cess

ary a

nd d

oes n

ot re

flect

the

requ

irem

ents

of

PPC9

no

r Sc

hedu

le

30.

Ra

ther

, Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

wha

t is

bein

g re

ferr

ed t

o he

re is

the

ne

ed to

iden

tify

mea

sure

s fo

r nut

rient

man

agem

ent

with

in

the

Catc

hmen

t Co

llect

ive

or

Indu

stry

Pr

ogra

mm

es (i

.e.,

as o

utlin

ed in

Cla

use

2.3

of S

ectio

n B

of S

ched

ule

30).

Colle

ctiv

es

and

Indu

stry

Pr

ogra

mm

es

to

ensu

re la

nd m

anag

ers;

(i)

ad

opt i

ndus

try

good

pra

ctice

;

(ii)

iden

tify

criti

cal

sour

ce

area

s of

co

ntam

inan

ts

at

both

pr

oper

ty

and

catc

hmen

t sca

le;

(iii)

adop

t ef

fect

ive

mea

sure

s to

miti

gate

or

redu

ce c

onta

min

ant l

oss;

(iv

) im

plem

ent

mea

sure

s fo

r pr

epar

e nu

trie

nt

man

agem

ent

plan

s in

ca

tchm

ents

no

t m

eetin

g ta

rget

s fo

r di

ssol

ved

nitr

ogen

.

22

Polic

y 18

18

Su

ppor

t in

part

Th

is po

licy

outli

nes i

nves

tigat

ions

, col

labo

ratio

ns a

nd

rese

arch

th

at

Coun

cil

inte

nd

to

unde

rtak

e to

de

term

ine

whe

ther

or

not

the

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ta

rget

s or

fres

hwat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

in S

ched

ule

26 a

re b

eing

, or h

ave

been

, ach

ieve

d an

d m

aint

aine

d as

a r

esul

t of

the

pol

icy a

nd r

egul

ator

y fra

mew

ork

prop

osed

in P

PC9.

Th

e ap

proa

ches

out

lined

in t

his

polic

y are

cons

ider

ed a

ppro

pria

te, p

artic

ular

ly in

ligh

t of

ens

urin

g th

at a

ppro

pria

te in

form

atio

n is

avai

labl

e to

un

derp

in

any

futu

re

reso

urce

m

anag

emen

t re

gion

al p

lan

deve

lopm

ent d

ecisi

ons.

Amen

d Po

licy

18 a

s fol

low

s:

The

Coun

cil

will

ac

hiev

e or

m

aint

ain

the

fresh

wat

er t

arge

ts o

r fre

shw

ater

obj

ectiv

es i

n Sc

hedu

le 2

6 by

;

a) g

athe

ring

info

rmat

ion

to

dete

rmin

e su

stai

nabl

e nu

trie

nt lo

ads;

b)

dev

elop

ing

nutr

ient

lim

its

and

a nu

trie

nt

allo

catio

n re

gim

e if

the

man

agem

ent

fram

ewor

k in

Pol

icy 1

7 is

not

achi

evin

g th

e fre

shw

ater

qu

ality

ob

ject

ives

le

adin

g to

Page 102: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A18

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

How

ever

, as

rai

sed

in p

revi

ous

subm

issio

n po

ints

, co

nsist

ent t

erm

inol

ogy

need

s to

be u

sed

thro

ugho

ut

PPC9

. Th

eref

ore,

an

amen

dmen

t to

par

t (b

) of t

he

polic

y ha

s bee

n re

ques

ted.

impr

oved

att

ribut

e st

ates

by t

he ti

me

this

plan

is

revi

ewed

; c)

re

gula

ting

land

use

cha

nge

whe

re t

here

is a

sig

nific

ant r

isk o

f inc

reas

ed n

itrog

en lo

ss;

d) g

athe

ring

and

asse

ssin

g in

form

atio

n ab

out

envi

ronm

enta

l st

ate

and

tren

ds

and

the

impa

ct o

f lan

d us

e ac

tiviti

es o

n th

ese;

e)

wor

king

with

indu

stry

gro

ups,

land

owne

rs a

nd

othe

r sta

keho

lder

s to

unde

rtak

e re

sear

ch a

nd

inve

stig

atio

n in

to;

(i)

nut

rient

pa

thw

ays,

conc

entr

atio

ns

and

load

s in

riv

ers

and

coas

tal

rece

ivin

g en

viro

nmen

ts;

(ii

) nu

trie

nt u

ptak

e an

d lo

ss p

athw

ays

at a

pr

oper

ty sc

ale;

(ii

i) mea

sure

s to

red

uce

nutr

ient

los

ses

at a

pr

oper

ty

as

wel

l as

ca

tchm

ent

scal

e in

clud

ing

thos

e de

liver

ed th

roug

h in

dust

ry

prog

ram

mes

.

23

Polic

y 19

18

O

ppos

e As

out

lined

abo

ve in

rel

atio

n to

Pol

icy 1

7 (S

ub. R

ef.

21),

Sche

dule

30

of

PP

C9

refe

rs

to

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

mea

sure

s to

man

age

nutr

ient

s, in

sp

ecifi

c ca

tchm

ents

, as p

art o

f Cat

chm

ent C

olle

ctiv

es

or In

dust

ry P

rogr

amm

es.

O

n th

is ba

sis,

the

requ

irem

ent

for

a ‘n

utrie

nt

man

agem

ent

plan

’ as

prop

osed

by

this

polic

y is

not

cons

ider

ed

to

be

requ

ired.

For

this

reas

on,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at P

olicy

19

shou

ld b

e de

lete

d.

Dele

te P

olicy

19

in it

s ent

irety

. In

cat

chm

ents

tha

t do

not

mee

t ob

ject

ives

for

di

ssol

ved

nutr

ient

s sp

ecifi

ed in

Sch

edul

e 26

, the

Co

uncil

w

ill

ensu

re

land

owne

rs,

land

owne

r co

llect

ives

and

ind

ustr

y gr

oups

hav

e nu

trie

nt

man

agem

ent p

lans

acc

ordi

ng to

the

prio

rity o

rder

in

Sch

edul

e 28

.

Page 103: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A19

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

Sedi

men

t Man

agem

ent

24

Polic

y 20

18

Su

ppor

t in

part

Ra

vens

dow

n is

gene

rally

in s

uppo

rt o

f Pol

icy 2

0 as

it

appr

opria

tely

out

lines

the

ran

ge o

f app

roac

hes

that

ca

n be

use

d to

miti

gate

sed

imen

tatio

n iss

ues

in

wat

erbo

dies

. Ho

wev

er, a

n am

endm

ent i

s sou

ght t

o th

e w

ordi

ng o

f th

e po

licy

to

clarif

y th

at

man

agem

ent

of

sedi

men

tatio

n is

the

appr

oach

bei

ng a

dopt

ed, w

ith

part

s (a

) to

(e)

of

the

polic

y ou

tlini

ng t

he d

iffer

ent

appr

oach

es th

at a

re p

ropo

sed

to b

e us

ed.

Amen

d Po

licy

20 a

s fol

low

s:

The

Coun

cil w

ill re

duce

man

age

adve

rse

effe

cts o

n fre

shw

ater

and

coa

stal

aqu

atic

ecos

yste

ms

from

er

oded

se

dim

ent,

and

from

th

e ph

osph

orus

as

socia

ted

with

this,

by

prio

ritisi

ng th

e fo

llow

ing

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res;

a)

reg

ulat

ing

culti

vatio

n,

stoc

k ac

cess

an

d ve

geta

tion

clear

ance

act

iviti

es;

b) t

arge

ting

prio

rity

area

s an

d ac

tiviti

es

for

sedi

men

t lo

ss m

anag

emen

t w

here

the

re i

s hi

gh se

dim

ent l

oss r

isk a

nd w

orki

ng w

ith la

nd

man

ager

s to

ide

ntify

and

man

age

criti

cal

sour

ce a

reas

of c

onta

min

ants

at b

oth

prop

erty

an

d ca

tchm

ent s

cale

; c)

in

form

ing

land

m

anag

ers

whe

re

land

is

vuln

erab

le t

o er

osio

n, u

sing

tool

s su

ch a

s Se

dNet

and

LUC

; an

d pr

ovid

ing

info

rmat

ion

abou

t mea

sure

s tha

t red

uce

soil

loss

; d)

rec

ogni

sing

the

bene

fits

prov

ided

by

tree

pl

antin

g an

d re

tirem

ent

of l

and

for

eros

ion

cont

rol

as

wel

l as

fo

r m

itiga

ting

clim

ate

chan

ge

effe

cts

and

impr

ovin

g in

dige

nous

bi

odiv

ersit

y by

; (i)

tar

getin

g re

sour

ces

whe

re

mul

tiple

ob

ject

ives

can

be m

et;

(ii

) an

d su

ppor

ting

land

owne

rs to

retir

e la

nd,

esta

blish

for

ests

whe

re a

ppro

pria

te,

and

plan

t tr

ees

on l

and

with

hig

h ac

tual

or

pote

ntia

l ero

sion

risk;

Page 104: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A20

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

e) S

uppo

rtin

g an

d en

cour

agin

g im

prov

ed

ripar

ian

man

agem

ent

acro

ss

all

TANK

ca

tchm

ents

.

Land

Use

Cha

nge

and

Nut

rient

Loss

es

25

Polic

y 21

19

Su

ppor

t in

part

Ra

vens

dow

n is

in g

ener

al s

uppo

rt o

f th

e in

tent

of

Polic

y 21

to

man

age

diffu

se d

ischa

rges

of

nitr

ogen

fro

m p

rodu

ctiv

e la

nd u

se a

s pro

vide

d fo

r with

in P

PC9

(i.e.

, re

quire

men

t fo

r re

sour

ce c

onse

nts

for

som

e pr

oduc

tive

land

use

s an

d th

e ne

ed f

or L

ando

wne

r Co

llect

ives

, Ind

ustr

y Pr

ogra

mm

es a

nd F

EPs)

. Ho

wev

er, R

aven

sdow

n co

nsid

ers t

hat t

here

are

som

e iss

ues a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith th

e pr

opos

ed p

olicy

.

Firs

tly, a

s ou

tline

d in

par

ts (a

) and

(d) o

f the

pol

icy,

the

achi

evem

ent o

f the

fres

hwat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

co

ntai

ned

in S

ched

ule

26 a

re th

e ai

m o

f PPC

9. T

his

polic

y ne

eds t

o re

flect

this

requ

irem

ent.

Seco

ndly

, PPC

9 es

tabl

ishes

a r

egul

ator

y fra

mew

ork

for

prod

uctiv

e la

nd

use

activ

ities

in

th

e TA

NK

catc

hmen

ts, n

ot ju

st w

here

land

use

or w

ater

use

is

chan

ging

.

This

fact

ne

eds

to

be

appr

opria

tely

re

cogn

ised

in th

e po

licy.

Amen

d Po

licy

21 a

s fol

low

s:

The

Coun

cil w

ill re

med

y or

miti

gate

the

pote

ntia

l im

pact

of

di

ffuse

di

scha

rge

of

nitr

ogen

on

fre

shw

ater

qu

ality

ob

ject

ives

by

re

gula

ting

prod

uctiv

e la

nd u

ses,

land

and

wat

er u

se ch

ange

s th

at m

odel

ling

indi

cate

s ar

e lik

ely

to r

esul

t in

in

crea

sed

nitr

ogen

loss

(mod

elle

d on

an

annu

al,

who

le o

f pr

oper

ty o

r w

hole

of

farm

ent

erpr

ise

basis

) an

d I

.In

mak

ing

decis

ions

on

reso

urce

co

nsen

t ap

plica

tions

, th

e Co

uncil

will

tak

e in

to

acco

unt:

a)

whe

ther

fre

shw

ater

qu

ality

ob

ject

ives

or

ta

rget

s are

bei

ng m

et in

the

catc

hmen

t whe

re

the

activ

ity is

to b

e un

dert

aken

; b)

whe

re a

ny re

leva

nt T

ANK

Indu

stry

Pro

gram

me

or C

atch

men

t Col

lect

ive

is in

pla

ce th

e ex

tent

to

w

hich

th

e ch

ange

d la

nd

use

activ

ity

prod

uctiv

e la

nd u

se a

ctiv

ity is

con

siste

nt w

ith

the

Indu

stry

Pr

ogra

mm

e or

Co

llect

ive

outc

omes

, m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s an

d tim

efra

mes

; c)

an

y m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s re

quire

d,

and

timef

ram

es

by

whi

ch

they

ar

e to

be

im

plem

ente

d th

at a

re n

eces

sary

to e

nsur

e th

e ac

tual

or p

oten

tial c

onta

min

ant l

oss o

ccur

ring

from

the

prop

erty

, in

com

bina

tion

with

oth

er

cont

amin

atio

n lo

sses

in th

e ca

tchm

ent w

ill b

e

Page 105: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A21

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

cons

isten

t w

ith m

eetin

g fre

shw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es, i

nclu

ding

per

form

ance

in r

elat

ion

to i

ndus

try

good

pra

ctice

, ef

ficie

nt u

se o

f nu

trie

nts

and

min

imisa

tion

of n

utrie

nt lo

sses

; an

d w

ill;

d) a

void

lan

d us

e ch

ange

tha

t w

ill r

esul

t in

in

crea

sed

nitr

ogen

los

s th

at c

ontr

ibut

es t

o fre

shw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es a

nd t

arge

ts i

n Sc

hedu

le 2

6 fo

r di

ssol

ved

nitr

ogen

not

bei

ng

met

.

Indu

stry

Pro

gram

mes

and

Cat

chm

ent M

anag

emen

t

26

Polic

y 23

19

Su

ppor

t W

hile

it

is co

nsid

ered

tha

t th

e de

velo

pmen

t an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of F

EPs b

y in

divi

dual

farm

ers m

ay b

e th

e pr

efer

red

appr

oach

ad

opte

d in

th

e TA

NK

catc

hmen

t, Ra

vens

dow

n al

so

supp

orts

th

e in

trod

uctio

n of

pro

pose

d In

dust

ry P

rogr

amm

es a

nd

Catc

hmen

t Co

llect

ives

, as

a m

eans

of

achi

evin

g th

e fre

shw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es a

nd o

ther

env

ironm

ent

obje

ctiv

es f

or t

he T

ANK

catc

hmen

ts b

y la

ndow

ners

w

orki

ng to

geth

er. I

n th

is co

ntex

t, it

is co

nsid

ered

that

m

atte

rs o

utlin

ed i

n pa

rts

(a)

to (

e) o

f th

e po

licy

appr

opria

tely

re

flect

th

e ar

eas

of

supp

ort

and

info

rmat

ion

prov

ision

that

Cou

ncil

shou

ld p

rovi

de to

th

ese

land

owne

rs.

How

ever

, an

amen

dmen

t is

prop

osed

in p

art

(d) o

f th

e po

licy,

to

en

sure

th

at

term

inol

ogy

used

th

roug

hout

PPC

9 is

cons

isten

t (i.

e., i

n th

is in

stan

ce,

‘fres

hwat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

’).

Whi

le

supp

ortin

g th

is po

licy,

Ra

vens

dow

n al

so

cons

ider

s, as

is

prov

ided

fo

r w

ithin

th

e PP

C9

prov

ision

s (i.

e., i

nclu

ding

Pol

icy 2

5 –

Sub.

Ref

. 28)

,

Amen

d Po

licy

23 a

s fol

low

s.

The

Coun

cil w

ill s

uppo

rt t

he e

stab

lishm

ent

and

oper

atio

n of

In

dust

ry

Prog

ram

mes

an

d Ca

tchm

ent C

olle

ctiv

es a

nd:

a) e

nsur

e an

y re

leva

nt in

form

atio

n or

exp

ertis

e fo

r m

akin

g su

stai

nabl

e la

nd m

anag

emen

t de

cisio

ns is

ava

ilabl

e to

land

man

ager

s;

b) s

uppo

rt

loca

l in

vest

igat

ion

and

wat

er

mon

itorin

g pr

ogra

mm

es w

here

inf

orm

atio

n ga

ps e

xist

; c)

su

ppor

t de

velo

pmen

t an

d us

e of

cat

chm

ent

scal

e m

odel

s th

at a

ssist

in id

entif

icat

ion

and

man

agem

ent o

f crit

ical s

ourc

e ar

eas;

d)

sup

port

cat

chm

ent

and

farm

sca

le d

ecisi

on

mak

ing

to m

eet f

resh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

an

d en

cour

age

loca

l sol

utio

ns a

nd in

nova

tive

and

flexi

ble

resp

onse

s to

wat

er q

ualit

y iss

ues;

e)

wor

k w

ith w

ater

per

mit

hold

ers t

o en

cour

age

and

supp

ort

esta

blish

men

t of

ca

tchm

ent

colle

ctiv

es

that

ad

dres

s bo

th

fresh

wat

er

Page 106: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A22

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

that

lan

dow

ners

who

are

not

par

t of

an

Indu

stry

Pr

ogra

mm

e or

Ca

tchm

ent

Colle

ctiv

e m

ust

be

requ

ired

to p

repa

re a

nd im

plem

ent a

FEP

.

As o

utlin

ed a

bove

in re

latio

n to

OBJ

TAN

K 1

(Sub

. Ref

. 1)

, Rav

ensd

own

supp

orts

the

con

tinue

d us

e of

the

te

rm F

EPs

thro

ugho

ut P

PC9,

as

FEPs

are

a t

ool

curr

ently

use

d na

tiona

lly, a

nd in

the

abse

nce

of th

e FF

P re

gula

tions

, it

is co

nsid

ered

pos

sible

tha

t a

FFP

coul

d fo

rm p

art o

f a b

road

er F

EP (i

.e.,

sect

ion

217F

of

the

RMAA

ide

ntifi

es t

he c

onte

nt r

equi

rem

ents

for

FF

P).

qual

ity

obje

ctiv

es

and

stre

am

flow

m

anag

emen

t th

roug

h en

viro

nmen

tal

man

agem

ent

prog

ram

mes

as

sp

ecifi

ed

in

Sche

dule

30

and

Sche

dule

36

and

with

in t

he

timef

ram

es sp

ecifi

ed in

Sch

edul

e 28

.

27

Polic

y 24

20

Su

ppor

t in

part

As

stat

ed a

bove

in re

latio

n to

Pol

icy 2

3 (S

ub. R

ef. 2

6),

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

pro

pose

d in

trod

uctio

n of

In

dust

ry P

rogr

amm

es a

nd C

atch

men

t Col

lect

ives

as a

m

eans

of a

chie

ving

the

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

an

d ot

her

envi

ronm

enta

l ob

ject

ives

for

the

TAN

K ca

tchm

ents

. T

his

inclu

des

the

need

s fo

r th

ese

prog

ram

mes

or c

olle

ctiv

es to

: -

iden

tify

prac

tices

, and

ass

ocia

ted

timef

ram

es, t

o m

eet t

he fr

eshw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es;

- un

dert

ake

mon

itorin

g;

- pr

ovid

e an

nual

repo

rts;

-

adop

t goo

d (m

anag

emen

t) pr

actic

es;

- co

mpl

y, o

r be

con

siste

nt, w

ith th

e re

quire

men

ts

of S

ched

ule

30,

inclu

ding

the

req

uire

men

ts f

or

Coun

cil a

ppro

val a

nd a

uditi

ng.

It is

cons

ider

ed th

at th

e ab

ove

appr

oach

es g

ener

ally

re

flect

reso

urce

man

agem

ent a

ppro

ache

s th

at h

ave

been

, or a

re b

eing

, ado

pted

thro

ugho

ut N

ew Z

eala

nd

in re

gion

al p

lan

prov

ision

s for

farm

ing

activ

ities

.

Whi

le t

he p

olicy

is

supp

orte

d, a

men

dmen

ts a

re

Amen

d Po

licy

24 a

s fol

low

s:

The

Coun

cil

will

co

ntin

ue

to

wor

k w

ith

land

owne

rs,

indu

stry

gr

oups

an

d ot

her

stak

ehol

ders

to

man

age

land

and

wat

er u

se

activ

ities

so

th

at

they

m

eet

obje

ctiv

es

for

fresh

wat

er/a

quat

ic e

cosy

stem

s by:

a)

fur

ther

su

ppor

ting

the

deve

lopm

ent

of

Indu

stry

Pr

ogra

mm

es

that

co

ntrib

ute

to

mee

ting

appl

icabl

e fre

shw

ater

qu

ality

ob

ject

ives

and

that

; (i)

id

entif

y pr

actic

es

that

co

ntrib

ute

to

mee

ting

appl

icabl

e fre

shw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es;

(ii)

spec

ify t

imef

ram

es f

or c

ompl

etio

n or

ad

optio

n of

m

easu

res

to

man

age

miti

gate

cont

amin

ant l

osse

s;

(iii)

ensu

re in

divi

dual

per

form

ance

und

er a

n In

dust

ry P

rogr

amm

e is

mon

itore

d;

(iv)

prov

ide

annu

al re

port

s to

the

Coun

cil o

n pr

ogre

ssiv

e im

plem

enta

tion

of m

easu

res

Page 107: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A23

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

requ

este

d.

Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

th

e la

ndow

ners

sho

uld

be r

equi

red

to m

anag

e ni

trog

en

loss

es i

n or

der

to a

chie

ve t

he f

resh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

, rat

her t

han

miti

gate

them

(ref

er to

par

ts

(a)(i

i) an

d (b

)(ii)

of t

he p

olic

y).

Oth

er a

men

dmen

ts

are

prop

osed

fo

r th

e pu

rpos

es

of

term

inol

ogy

cons

isten

cy (i

.e.,

‘fres

hwat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

’) an

d to

pro

vide

cla

rity

as to

the

inte

nt o

f a p

rovi

sion

(i.e.

, th

e re

ques

ted

amen

dmen

t to

par

t (b

)(i)

of t

he

polic

y).

iden

tifie

d in

In

dust

ry

Prog

ram

mes

es

tabl

ished

un

der

Sche

dule

30

an

d pr

ogre

ss

tow

ards

m

eetin

g ap

plica

ble

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

for

wat

er

qual

ity;

(v

) pr

omot

e ad

optio

n of

go

od

indu

stry

pr

actic

e;

(vi)

ensu

re t

hat

Indu

stry

Pro

gram

mes

are

co

nsist

ent

with

th

e re

quire

men

ts

of

Sche

dule

30;

b)

sup

port

ing

land

owne

rs

to

esta

blish

Ca

tchm

ent

Colle

ctiv

es

to

deve

lop

and

impl

emen

t env

ironm

enta

l man

agem

ent p

lans

th

at

cont

ribut

e to

m

eetin

g ap

plica

ble

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

and

that

; (i)

id

entif

y an

d ad

opt

mea

sure

s at

a

prop

erty

scal

e an

d co

llect

ivel

y w

ith o

ther

la

nd m

anag

ers t

hat r

educ

e co

ntam

inan

t lo

sses

or

rem

edy

or m

itiga

te th

e ef

fect

s of

land

use

s on

fresh

wat

er o

bjec

tives

;

(ii)

spec

ify t

imef

ram

es f

or c

ompl

etio

n or

ad

optio

n of

mea

sure

s to

redu

ce m

itiga

te

cont

amin

ant l

osse

s;

(iii)

ensu

re i

ndiv

idua

l pe

rform

ance

und

er a

ca

tchm

ent c

olle

ctiv

e is

mon

itore

d;

(iv)

prov

ide

annu

al re

port

s to

the

Coun

cil o

n pr

ogre

ssiv

e im

plem

enta

tion

of m

easu

res

iden

tifie

d in

la

ndow

ner

colle

ctiv

es

esta

blish

ed

unde

r Sc

hedu

le

30

and

prog

ress

to

war

ds

mee

ting

appl

icabl

e

Page 108: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A24

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

for

wat

er

qual

ity;

(v

) pr

omot

e ad

optio

n of

goo

d ag

ricul

tura

l pr

actic

e;

(vi)

ensu

re

prog

ram

mes

pr

epar

ed

by

a co

llect

ive

are

cons

isten

t w

ith

the

requ

irem

ents

of S

ched

ule

30;

c)

Appr

ovin

g an

y La

ndow

ner

Colle

ctiv

e or

In

dust

ry

Prog

ram

me

deve

lope

d un

der

Sche

dule

30;

d)

Aud

iting

Lan

dow

ner

Colle

ctiv

e or

Ind

ustr

y Pr

ogra

mm

es p

repa

red

and

appr

oved

und

er

Sche

dule

30

incl

udin

g au

ditin

g of

mem

ber

prop

ertie

s.

28

Polic

y 25

20

Su

ppor

t As

out

lined

abo

ve in

rel

atio

n to

Pol

icy 2

3 (S

ub. R

ef.

26),

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s it

is ap

prop

riate

tha

t la

ndow

ners

w

ho

are

not

part

of

an

In

dust

ry

Prog

ram

me

or C

atch

men

t Col

lect

ive

are

requ

ired

to

prep

are

and

impl

emen

t a F

EP.

Ther

efor

e, th

is po

licy

is su

ppor

ted.

Reta

in P

olicy

25

as n

otifi

ed.

Man

agem

ent a

nd co

mpl

ianc

e

29

Polic

y 26

20

Su

ppor

t As

stat

ed a

bove

in re

latio

n to

Pol

icies

23

and

24 (S

ub.

Refs

. 26

and

27),

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

prop

osed

in

trod

uctio

n an

d im

plem

enta

tion

of

Catc

hmen

t Co

llect

ives

and

Indu

stry

Pro

gram

mes

. In

this

cont

ext,

it is

cons

ider

ed th

at it

is n

eces

sary

that

a p

roce

ss is

in

plac

e to

reso

lve

or a

ddre

ss is

sues

whe

re in

divi

dual

s, as

mem

bers

of s

uch

sche

mes

, are

not

mee

ting

thei

r ob

ligat

ions

. Fo

r thi

s rea

son,

this

polic

y is

supp

orte

d.

Whi

le th

e po

licy

is su

ppor

ted,

a m

inor

am

endm

ent i

s re

ques

ted

for t

he p

urpo

se o

f ter

min

olog

y con

siste

ncy

Amen

d Po

licy

26 a

s fol

low

s:

Whe

re in

divi

dual

s ar

e m

embe

rs o

f a

Catc

hmen

t Co

llect

ive

or I

ndus

try

Prog

ram

me

but

do n

ot

unde

rtak

e th

eir

activ

ity i

n ac

cord

ance

with

the

ap

prov

ed

plan

pr

epar

ed

in

acco

rdan

ce

with

Sc

hedu

le 3

0, o

r do

not f

ollo

w th

e ag

reed

term

s of

mem

bers

hip

the

Coun

cil w

ill;

a)

pro

vide

a co

nflic

t res

olut

ion

serv

ice;

Page 109: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A25

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

(i.e.

, ‘fa

rm e

nviro

nmen

t pla

n’, n

ot ‘f

arm

pla

n’).

b)

whe

re a

n in

divi

dual

is n

o lo

nger

, or i

s dee

med

th

roug

h co

nflic

t re

solu

tion

proc

esse

s no

t to

be

, a m

embe

r the

Cou

ncil

will

; (i)

req

uire

th

e de

velo

pmen

t of

a

farm

en

viro

nmen

t pla

n fo

r tha

t pro

pert

y w

ithin

6

mon

ths o

r;

(ii)

requ

ire a

n ap

plica

tion

for

a la

nd u

se

cons

ent t

o be

mad

e;

c)

take

app

ropr

iate

enf

orce

men

t act

ion.

Tim

efra

mes

: Wat

er a

nd E

cosy

stem

Qua

lity

30

Polic

y 27

21

O

ppos

e Th

is po

licy

iden

tifie

s th

at C

ounc

il w

ill i

dent

ify a

n im

plem

enta

tion

plan

to

ensu

re t

hat

all

rele

vant

pa

rtie

s ar

e en

gage

d in

In

dust

ry

Prog

ram

mes

, Ca

tchm

ent

Colle

ctiv

es

or

prep

ared

FE

Ps

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith th

e tim

efra

mes

spec

ified

in Sc

hedu

le

28 a

nd t

o re

port

on

the

mile

ston

es o

utlin

ed in

the

ta

ble

atta

ched

to

this

polic

y.

It is

cons

ider

ed t

his

polic

y is

unce

rtai

n, la

cks c

larit

y an

d is

unne

cess

ary

in

the

cont

ext o

f PPC

9 pr

ovisi

ons a

s a w

hole

.

On

the

abov

e ba

sis,

and

give

n th

e am

endm

ents

/cla

rifica

tion

soug

ht

to

Sche

dule

28

(S

ub. R

ef. 5

9), R

aven

sdow

n co

nsid

ers t

hat t

his p

olicy

ad

ds n

othi

ng t

o PP

C9 a

nd t

here

fore

sho

uld

be

dele

ted.

Dele

te P

olicy

27

(inclu

ding

Tab

le 1

) in

its e

ntire

ty.

The

Coun

cil w

ill d

evel

op a

n im

plem

enta

tion

plan

fo

r th

is Pl

an

Chan

ge

with

in

dust

ry

grou

ps,

land

owne

rs,

wat

er

perm

it ho

lder

s, ta

ngat

a w

henu

a, a

nd o

ther

sta

keho

lder

s to

ens

ure

that

th

e la

nd o

wne

rs a

nd le

ase

hold

ers a

re e

ngag

ed in

in

dust

ry o

r la

ndow

ner

colle

ctiv

e pr

ogra

mm

es o

r ha

ve p

repa

red

farm

env

ironm

enta

l pla

ns w

ithin

th

e tim

efra

mes

in

Sche

dule

28

and

to e

nsur

e re

port

ing

(as

spec

ified

in

Sche

dule

30)

on

the

mile

ston

es in

Tab

le 1

bel

ow.

Tabl

e 1:

Mile

ston

es a

nd T

imef

ram

es

…

Sect

ion

5.10

.4 –

Pol

icie

s: S

torm

wat

er M

anag

emen

t

Urba

n In

fras

truc

ture

31

Polic

y 28

22

Su

ppor

t in

part

Ra

vens

dow

n is

supp

ortiv

e of

the

inte

nt o

f thi

s pol

icy

to e

nsur

e th

at a

dver

se e

ffect

s on

aqua

tic e

cosy

stem

s an

d co

mm

unity

w

ell -b

eing

fro

m

stor

mw

ater

di

scha

rge,

whe

ther

fro

m lo

cal a

utho

rity

retic

ulat

ed

Amen

d Po

licy

28 a

s fol

low

s:

The

adve

rse

effe

cts

of s

torm

wat

er q

ualit

y an

d qu

antit

y on

aqu

atic

ecos

yste

ms

and

com

mun

ity

wel

l-bei

ng a

risin

g fro

m e

xist

ing

and

new

urb

an

Page 110: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A26

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

netw

ork

or a

site

-spe

cific

disc

harg

e, a

re re

duce

d an

d m

itiga

ted.

To

tha

t en

d, t

he v

ario

us a

ppro

ache

s ou

tline

d in

par

ts (a

) to

(k) a

re g

ener

ally

cons

ider

ed to

re

flect

app

ropr

iate

bes

t and

goo

d pr

actic

e.

This

supp

ort

inclu

des

the

prep

arat

ion

of

‘site

m

anag

emen

t pl

ans’,

as

prop

osed

in p

art

(k)

of t

he

polic

y, fo

r in

dust

rial a

nd t

rade

pre

mise

s w

ith a

hig

h ris

k of

stor

mw

ater

con

tam

inat

ion.

Thi

s re

quire

men

t w

ill

appl

y to

Ra

vens

dow

n’s

Napi

er

Wor

ks

and

pote

ntia

lly th

e Se

vern

Str

eet s

tore

. Ho

wev

er,

Rave

nsdo

wn

is co

ncer

ned

abou

t th

e tim

efra

me

prop

osed

in te

rms o

f bei

ng a

ble

to e

nsur

e th

at t

he ‘

best

pra

ctica

ble

optio

n’,

as e

ffect

ivel

y pr

opos

ed u

nder

this

polic

y, c

an b

e im

plem

ente

d an

d th

en a

chie

ve t

he o

utco

me

soug

ht in

the

nex

t fo

ur

year

s. T

here

is

also

the

que

stio

n of

how

the

se

appr

oach

es w

ill b

e im

plem

ente

d or

enf

orce

d.

For

exam

ple,

for

man

y ex

istin

g ac

tiviti

es, i

t is

envi

sage

d th

at m

any

of t

hese

req

uire

men

ts w

ill n

eed

to b

e co

nsid

ered

whe

n a

reso

urce

con

sent

is

rene

wed

, un

less

con

sent

rev

iew

s ar

e in

itiat

ed.

On

this

basis

, th

e de

letio

n of

the

1 J

anua

ry 2

025

timef

ram

e is

requ

este

d.

Anot

her

issue

for

Rav

ensd

own,

is

the

need

for

re

gion

al c

ounc

ils a

nd te

rrito

rial a

utho

ritie

s to

ensu

re

that

an

in

tegr

ated

ap

proa

ch

and

cons

isten

t re

quire

men

ts a

re b

eing

art

icul

ated

whe

n ac

tiviti

es,

such

as

indu

stria

l act

iviti

es w

hich

are

app

ropr

iate

ly

loca

ted

with

in

indu

stria

l zo

nes

in

urba

n ar

eas,

di

scha

rge

site

stor

mw

ater

in

to

retic

ulat

ed

stor

mw

ater

ne

twor

ks.

Gi

ven

this

conc

ern,

an

am

endm

ent t

o pa

rt (a

) of t

his p

olicy

is re

ques

ted

that

deve

lopm

ent

(incl

udin

g in

fill

deve

lopm

ent)

, in

dust

rial

and

trad

e pr

emise

s an

d as

socia

ted

infra

stru

ctur

e, w

ill b

e re

duce

d or

miti

gate

d no

la

ter t

han

1 Ja

nuar

y 20

25, b

y:

a) L

ocal

Aut

horit

ies,

in c

onju

nctio

n w

ith H

BRC,

ad

optin

g an

co

nsist

ent

and

inte

grat

ed

catc

hmen

t m

anag

emen

t ap

proa

ch

to

the

colle

ctio

n an

d di

scha

rge

of st

orm

wat

er;

b)

req

uirin

g st

orm

wat

er to

be

disc

harg

ed in

to a

re

ticul

ated

stor

mw

ater

net

wor

k w

here

such

a

netw

ork

is av

aila

ble

or w

ill b

e m

ade

avai

labl

e as

par

t of t

he d

evel

opm

ent;

c)

re

quiri

ng, w

here

feas

ible

, inc

reas

ed re

tent

ion

or

dete

ntio

n of

st

orm

wat

er,

whi

le

not

exac

erba

ting

ensu

ring

that

floo

d ha

zard

s ar

e no

t exa

cerb

ated

; d)

tak

ing

into

acc

ount

site

spe

cific

cons

trai

nts

incl

udin

g ar

eas w

ith h

igh

grou

ndw

ater

, sou

rce

prot

ectio

n zo

nes,

and/

or

an

outs

tand

ing

wat

er b

ody;

e)

tak

ing

into

ac

coun

t th

e co

llabo

rativ

e ap

proa

ch o

f HB

RC, N

apie

r Ci

ty a

nd H

astin

gs

Dist

rict c

ounc

ils in

man

agin

g ur

ban

grow

th o

n th

e He

reta

unga

Pl

ains

as

it

rela

tes

to

stor

mw

ater

man

agem

ent;

f)

taki

ng i

nto

acco

unt

the

effe

cts

of c

limat

e ch

ange

whe

n pr

ovid

ing

for n

ew a

nd u

pgra

ding

ex

istin

g in

frast

ruct

ure;

g)

ado

ptin

g, w

here

pra

ctica

ble,

a g

ood

prac

tice

appr

oach

to

st

orm

wat

er

man

agem

ent

incl

udin

g ad

optio

n of

Low

Impa

ct D

esig

n fo

r

Page 111: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A27

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

iden

tifie

s the

nee

d fo

r col

labo

ratio

n an

d co

nsist

ency

. In

rel

atio

n to

the

amen

dmen

ts s

ough

t to

part

(h) o

f th

e po

licy,

it

is no

ted

that

so

me

stor

mw

ater

di

scha

rges

ar

e pe

rmitt

ed

activ

ities

.

Ther

efor

e,

spec

ifyin

g, w

ithin

thi

s pa

rt o

f th

e po

licy,

tha

t th

e re

quire

men

ts

will

be

ac

hiev

ed

thro

ugh

cons

ent

cond

ition

s is n

ot a

ppro

pria

te.

An a

men

dmen

t to

part

(c) i

s pr

opos

ed to

cla

rify

that

it

may

no

t al

way

s be

fe

asib

le

for

stor

mw

ater

re

tent

ion

and

dete

ntio

n to

be

prov

ided

. Fi

nally

, in

re

latio

n to

pa

rt

(k)

of

the

polic

y,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at t

his

part

of

the

polic

y sh

ould

cla

rify

that

thes

e re

quire

men

ts, t

hat a

pply

to

indu

stria

l an

d tr

ade

prem

ises,

will

be

cons

ider

ed

thro

ugh

the

reso

urce

con

sent

pro

cess

(in

cludi

ng

cons

ent c

ondi

tions

). In

add

ition

, som

e m

inor

am

endm

ents

are

pro

pose

d to

pro

vide

cla

rity

and

for t

he p

urpo

se o

f ter

min

olog

y co

nsist

ency

.

stor

mw

ater

syst

ems;

h)

am

endi

ng d

istric

t pl

ans,

stan

dard

s, co

des

of

prac

tice

and

byla

ws

to

spec

ify

desig

n st

anda

rds

for

stor

mw

ater

ret

icula

tion

and

disc

harg

e fa

ciliti

es

thro

ugh

cons

ent

cond

ition

s, th

at w

ill a

chie

ve t

he f

resh

wat

er

qual

ity o

bjec

tives

set o

ut in

this

plan

;

i) de

velo

ping

and

mak

ing

avai

labl

e to

the

publ

ic ad

vice

abo

ut g

ood

stor

mw

ater

man

agem

ent

optio

ns (i

nclu

ding

thro

ugh

HBRC

’s gu

idel

ines

);

j) en

cour

agin

g, t

hrou

gh e

duca

tion

and

publ

ic aw

aren

ess

prog

ram

mes

, gre

ater

upt

ake

and

inst

alla

tion

of m

easu

res

that

red

uce

risk

of

stor

mw

ater

cont

amin

atio

n;

k)

requ

iring

, no

la

ter

than

1

Janu

ary

2025

th

roug

h re

sour

ce c

onse

nts,

the

pre

para

tion

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

a s

ite m

anag

emen

t pl

an a

nd g

ood

site

man

agem

ent p

ract

ices

on

indu

stria

l and

trad

e pr

emise

s w

ith a

hig

h ris

k of

stor

mw

ater

cont

amin

atio

n an

d th

ose

in th

e hi

gh p

riorit

y ar

eas:

(i)

of

the

Ahur

iri ca

tchm

ent;

(ii

) of

the

Kara

mū

Rive

r and

its t

ribut

arie

s;

(iii)

of la

nd o

ver t

he u

ncon

fined

aqu

ifer;

and

(iv

) w

ithin

ide

ntifi

ed d

rinki

ng w

ater

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

nes.

Sour

ce C

ontr

ol

32

Polic

y 29

22

O

ppos

e W

hile

Rav

ensd

own

is su

ppor

tive

of t

he a

im o

f th

e po

licy

to r

educ

e st

orm

wat

er c

onta

min

atio

n, i

t is

cons

ider

ed

that

th

is po

licy

unne

cess

ary

as

it ef

fect

ivel

y rep

eats

the

guid

ance

pro

vide

d by

Pol

icy 2

8

Dele

te P

olicy

29

in it

s ent

irety

. So

urce

s of

st

orm

wat

er

cont

amin

atio

n an

d co

ntam

inat

ed st

orm

wat

er w

ill b

e re

duce

d by

:

Page 112: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A28

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

(refe

r to

Sub.

Ref

. 31)

.

Anot

her i

ssue

with

this

polic

y, is

that

par

t (c)

spec

ifies

th

at a

ctiv

ities

that

resu

lt in

‘wat

er q

ualit

y st

anda

rds’

not

bein

g m

et w

ill,

if ne

cess

ary,

be

avoi

ded,

thu

s in

ferr

ing

proh

ibite

d ac

tivity

sta

tus.

Rav

ensd

own

agre

e th

at s

torm

wat

er d

ischa

rges

fro

m a

ctiv

ities

sh

ould

not

resu

lt in

the

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

no

t be

ing

met

. Ho

wev

er, a

s ou

tline

d in

Pol

icy 2

8,

ther

e ar

e a

rang

e of

app

roac

hes

that

sho

uld

be

impl

emen

ted

with

in

site,

or

w

ithin

re

ticul

ated

ne

twor

k ca

tchm

ents

, th

at w

ill e

nsur

e th

at a

dver

se

effe

cts

from

sto

rmw

ater

disc

harg

es a

re r

educ

ed o

r m

itiga

ted.

a) s

pecif

ying

req

uire

men

ts f

or t

he d

esig

n an

d in

stal

latio

n of

stor

mw

ater

con

trol

facil

ities

on

sites

whe

re t

here

is a

hig

h ris

k of

fres

hwat

er

cont

amin

atio

n ar

ising

fro

m e

ither

the

dire

ct

disc

harg

e of

sto

rmw

ater

to

fresh

wat

er,

the

disc

harg

e of

sto

rmw

ater

to

land

whe

re i

t m

ight

ent

er w

ater

or

the

disc

harg

e to

a

stor

mw

ater

or d

rain

age

netw

ork;

b)

req

uiri

ng t

he i

mpl

emen

tatio

n of

goo

d si

te

man

agem

ent p

ract

ices

on

all s

ites w

here

ther

e is

a r

isk o

f sto

rmwa

ter

cont

amin

atio

n ar

isin

g fr

om th

e us

e, o

r sto

rage

of c

onta

min

ants

;

c) c

ontr

ollin

g,

and

if ne

cess

ary

avoi

ding

, ac

tiviti

es t

hat

will

res

ult

in w

ater

qua

lity

stan

dard

s not

bei

ng a

ble

to b

e m

et.

Deal

ing

with

the

Lega

cy

33

Polic

y 30

23

Su

ppor

t in

part

/ O

ppos

e in

par

t

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

inte

nt o

f thi

s pol

icy, w

hich

is

that

Cou

ncil

will

wor

k w

ith th

e lo

cal a

utho

ritie

s to

id

entif

y th

e de

sired

out

com

es a

nd t

hen

wor

king

to

geth

er t

o ac

hiev

e th

e id

entif

ied

outc

omes

. T

his

inclu

des

the

redu

ctio

n of

sto

rmw

ater

con

tam

inan

ts

from

the

ir re

ticul

ated

sys

tem

s, w

here

fre

shw

ater

qu

ality

obj

ectiv

es a

re n

ot b

eing

met

, in

ord

er t

o pr

ovid

e fo

r im

prov

ed a

quat

ic ec

osys

tem

hea

lth a

nd

com

mun

ity w

ell-b

eing

.

How

ever

, th

is po

licy

is co

nfus

ing,

as

it in

trod

uces

‘w

ater

qua

lity

stan

dard

s’ w

hich

are

in a

dditi

on to

the

Sche

dule

26

fre

shw

ater

qu

ality

ob

ject

ives

th

at

unde

rpin

PPC

9.

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at t

he

‘wat

er q

ualit

y st

anda

rds’

cont

aine

d in

par

t (a)

are

not

ne

eded

and

refe

renc

e to

them

shou

ld b

e de

lete

d.

Amen

d Po

licy

30 a

s fol

low

s:

Aqua

tic

ecos

yste

m

heal

th

impr

ovem

ents

an

d co

mm

unity

wel

lbei

ng a

nd r

educ

ed s

torm

wat

er

cont

amin

atio

n w

ill b

e ac

hiev

ed b

y HB

RC w

orki

ng

with

the

Napi

er C

ity a

nd H

astin

gs D

istric

t Cou

ncils

re

quiri

ng d

ischa

rges

fro

m s

torm

wat

er n

etw

orks

to

mee

t: a)

wat

er

qual

ity

obje

ctiv

es

(whe

re

they

ar

e de

grad

ed

by

stor

mw

ater

) an

d th

e id

entif

icatio

n of

m

easu

res

that

en

sure

st

orm

wat

er d

ischa

rges

will

ach

ieve

at l

east

: (i)

the

80

th

perc

entil

e le

vel

of

spec

ies

prot

ectio

n in

rece

ivin

g w

ater

s by

1 Ja

nuar

y 20

25; a

nd

Page 113: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A29

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

Fina

lly,

a m

inor

am

endm

ent

is pr

opos

ed f

or t

he

purp

ose

of te

rmin

olog

y co

nsist

ency

. (ii

) th

e 95

th

perc

entil

e le

vel3

of

sp

ecie

s pr

otec

tion

by 3

1 De

cem

ber 2

040.

an

d b)

exc

ept

as i

n (a

) ab

ove,

the

man

agem

ent

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

in S

ched

ule

26

for

fresh

wat

er a

nd e

stua

ry h

ealth

thr

ough

re

sour

ce

cons

ent

cond

ition

s, in

cludi

ng

requ

irem

ents

; (i)

to

appl

y th

e St

ream

Eco

logi

cal V

alua

tion

met

hodo

logy

to in

form

furt

her a

ctio

ns;

(ii)

to i

nsta

ll tr

eatm

ent

devi

ces

with

in t

he

drai

nage

net

wor

k w

here

app

ropr

iate

; (ii

i) fo

r st

ream

pl

antin

g/re

-alig

nmen

t fo

r aq

uatic

eco

syst

em e

nhan

cem

ent;

(iv) f

or

wet

land

cr

eatio

n,

wat

er

sens

itive

de

sign

and

othe

r op

port

uniti

es

for

incr

easin

g st

orm

wat

er i

nfilt

ratio

n w

here

ap

prop

riate

; (v

) re

cogn

ise

exist

ing

and

plan

ned

inve

stm

ents

in st

orm

wat

er in

frast

ruct

ure

Ahur

iri C

atch

men

t

34

Polic

y 32

23

Su

ppor

t Th

is po

licy

is of

inte

rest

to R

aven

sdow

n as

its S

ever

n St

reet

stor

e is

loca

ted

in th

e Ah

uriri

catc

hmen

t.

This

polic

y id

entif

ies

that

an

Inte

grat

ed C

atch

men

t M

anag

emen

t Pl

an is

to

be p

repa

red

for

the

Ahur

iri

Estu

ary,

with

the

aim

of t

he p

lan

bein

g to

impr

ove

the

qual

ity o

f the

fres

hwat

er e

nter

ing

the

estu

ary

and

to

furt

her

inve

stig

ate

how

th

e es

tuar

y fu

nctio

ns.

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

pro

pose

d ap

proa

ch a

s ou

tline

d in

this

polic

y.

Reta

in P

olicy

32

as n

otifi

ed.

Page 114: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A30

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

Sect

ion

5.10

.5 –

Pol

icie

s: M

onito

ring

and

Revi

ew

35

Polic

y 33

24

Su

ppor

t To

de

term

ine

the

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

PP

C9,

it is

impo

rtan

t th

at

Coun

cil

unde

rtak

es

appr

opria

tely

fo

cuss

ed m

onito

ring.

Rav

ensd

own

cons

ider

s tha

t the

na

ture

of

the

mon

itorin

g ou

tline

d in

thi

s po

licy

refle

cts

man

y of

the

con

sider

atio

ns o

f im

port

ance

w

hen

dete

rmin

ing

ecos

yste

m h

ealth

and

mau

ri of

the

TANK

catc

hmen

ts.

Amen

d Po

licy

33 a

s fol

low

s:

The

Coun

cil w

ill re

cogn

ise a

nd su

ppor

t mon

itorin

g ac

cord

ing

to

māt

aura

nga

Māo

ri an

d w

ill

reco

gnise

and

sup

port

loca

l sca

le m

onito

ring

to

asse

ss e

cosy

stem

hea

lth a

nd m

auri

incl

udin

g w

ater

qua

lity

in re

latio

n to

iden

tifie

d va

lues

and

its

cont

ribut

ion

to:

a) u

nder

stan

ding

loc

al e

cosy

stem

hea

lth a

nd

land

and

wat

er u

se im

pact

s on

it;

b) e

nabl

ing

kaiti

aki

and

reso

urce

us

ers’

resp

onsib

ilitie

s fo

r su

stai

nabl

e fre

shw

ater

m

anag

emen

t to

be m

et;

c)

asse

ssin

g ef

fect

iven

ess

of

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res a

dopt

ed to

mee

t fre

shw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es;

d) u

nder

stan

ding

stat

e an

d tr

ends

of l

ocal

wat

er

qual

ity;

e) a

ddin

g to

th

e re

gion

al

know

ledg

e ab

out

envi

ronm

enta

l sta

te a

nd tr

ends

; by

; f)

deve

lopi

ng

prot

ocol

s an

d pr

oced

ures

fo

r m

onito

ring

appr

opria

te to

the

purp

ose

of th

e m

onito

ring;

g)

pr

ovid

ing

assis

tanc

e an

d ad

vice

; h)

sup

port

ing

the

prov

ision

of

m

onito

ring

mat

eria

ls;

i) co

llatin

g an

d re

port

ing

on

data

as

ap

prop

riate

.

Page 115: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A31

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

36

Polic

y 35

24

Su

ppor

t Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

it

is im

port

ant

that

Co

uncil

un

dert

akes

ap

prop

riate

ly

focu

ssed

m

onito

ring.

Fo

r th

is re

ason

, Rav

ensd

own

gene

rally

co

nsid

ers

that

the

natu

re o

f the

mon

itorin

g ou

tline

d in

thi

s po

licy

refle

cts

man

y of

the

con

sider

atio

ns o

f im

port

ance

whe

n de

term

inin

g ec

osys

tem

hea

lth a

nd

mau

ri of

the

TANK

cat

chm

ents

. W

hile

Ra

vens

dow

n su

ppor

ts

this

polic

y,

an

amen

dmen

t to

par

t (c

) is

requ

ired

to a

ccom

mod

ate

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s re

ques

ted

dele

tion

of P

olicy

27

(Sub

. Re

f. 30

). In

add

ition

, it i

s con

sider

ed th

at p

art (

f) of

the

polic

y is

not n

eede

d as

sect

ion

79 o

f the

RM

A sp

ecifi

es w

hen

regi

onal

(and

dist

rict)

plan

s are

to b

e re

view

ed.

Fina

lly, m

inor

am

endm

ents

are

pro

pose

d to

ref

lect

th

at t

he P

PC9

does

not

jus

t co

ntai

n w

ater

qua

lity

prov

ision

s an

d fo

r th

e pu

rpos

e of

te

rmin

olog

y co

nsist

ency

.

Amen

d Po

licy

35 a

s fol

low

s:

The

Coun

cil w

ill m

onito

r an

d re

port

on

the

effe

ctiv

enes

s of

th

e TA

NK

wat

er

qual

ity

man

agem

ent

polic

ies

and

rule

s, a

nd t

o as

sist

in

mak

ing

decis

ions

abo

ut r

evie

win

g or

cha

ngin

g th

is m

anag

emen

t fra

mew

ork,

the

Coun

cil w

ill:

a) c

ontin

ue t

o m

onito

r in

stre

am w

ater

qua

lity

and

revi

ew

and

repo

rt

on

the

prog

ress

to

war

ds a

nd a

chie

vem

ent

of t

he f

resh

wat

er

qual

ity

obje

ctiv

es

in

Sche

dule

26

an

d ac

cord

ing

to O

bjec

tives

2 a

nd 3

of t

his P

lan

in

its

regu

lar

Stat

e of

th

e En

viro

nmen

t m

onito

ring;

b)

mon

itor

and

repo

rt o

n th

e st

ate

of r

ipar

ian

land

and

wet

land

s, an

d ca

rry

out

regu

lar

ecos

yste

m

habi

tat

asse

ssm

ents

, in

clud

ing

nativ

e fis

h m

onito

ring

and

thro

ugh

the

appl

icatio

n of

māt

aura

nga

Māo

ri to

ols

and

appr

oach

es w

hen

they

are

dev

elop

ed;

c)

mon

itor

the

prog

ress

tow

ards

the

mile

ston

es

liste

d in

Pol

icy 2

7, a

ccor

ding

to

timef

ram

es

spec

ified

in

Sche

dule

28,

and

col

late

and

re

port

ann

ually

on

info

rmat

ion

abou

t; (i)

the

nat

ure

and

exte

nt o

f th

e m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s be

ing

adop

ted

to m

eet

wat

er

qual

ity a

nd/o

r qua

ntity

out

com

es th

roug

h Ca

tchm

ent

Colle

ctiv

es,

Indu

stry

Pr

ogra

mm

es a

nd F

arm

Env

ironm

ent P

lans

; (ii

) th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent

of

Catc

hmen

t Co

llect

ives

an

d as

sess

pr

ogre

ss

in

Page 116: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A32

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

impl

emen

ting

the

mea

sure

s sp

ecifi

ed i

n th

eir e

nviro

nmen

t pla

ns;

(iii)

the

prep

arat

ion

of

Farm

En

viro

nmen

t Pl

ans a

nd a

sses

s pro

gres

s in

impl

emen

ting

the

mea

sure

s spe

cifie

d in

that

pla

n;

d) w

ork

with

In

dust

ry

Grou

ps

to

colla

te

info

rmat

ion

annu

ally

on

the

func

tioni

ng a

nd

succ

ess

of

any

Indu

stry

Pr

ogra

mm

e in

im

plem

entin

g m

easu

res

spec

ified

in

th

e In

dust

ry P

rogr

amm

e;

e) a

long

w

ith

the

Napi

er

City

Co

uncil

an

d Ha

stin

gs D

istric

t Co

unci

l, re

port

ann

ually

on

prog

ress

tow

ards

the

im

prov

emen

t of

the

st

orm

wat

er n

etw

ork,

inc

ludi

ng r

epor

ting

on

the

prep

arat

ion

of S

ite M

anag

emen

t Pla

ns fo

r ac

tiviti

es a

t risk

of c

onta

min

atin

g st

orm

wat

er

in u

rban

are

as;

And

f) co

mm

ence

a re

view

of t

hese

pro

visio

ns w

ithin

te

n ye

ars

of <

oper

ativ

e da

te>

in a

ccor

danc

e w

ith se

ctio

n 79

of t

he R

MA.

Sect

ion

5.10

.6 –

Pol

icie

s: H

eret

aung

a Pl

ains

Gro

undw

ater

Leve

ls an

d Al

loca

tion

Lim

its

Here

taun

ga P

lain

s Aqu

ifer M

anag

emen

t

37

Polic

y 36

25

Su

ppor

t in

part

Ra

vens

dow

n’s

Napi

er

Wor

ks,

whi

ch

take

s gr

ound

wat

er fo

r use

with

in th

e sit

e, is

loca

ted

in th

e He

reta

unga

Pla

ins

Grou

ndw

ater

Man

agem

ent

Unit

(HPG

MU)

. T

here

fore

, th

is po

licy

is of

pot

entia

l re

leva

nce

to R

aven

sdow

n.

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at t

he p

oten

tial

adve

rse

effe

cts

asso

ciate

d w

ith

grou

ndw

ater

abs

trac

tion

are

appr

opria

tely

iden

tifie

d

Amen

d Po

licy

36 a

s fol

low

s:

The

Coun

cil r

ecog

nise

s th

e ac

tual

and

pot

entia

l ad

vers

e ef

fect

s of g

roun

dwat

er a

bstr

actio

n in

the

Here

taun

ga P

lain

s Wat

er M

anag

emen

t Uni

t on:

a)

gro

undw

ater

leve

ls an

d aq

uife

r dep

letio

n;

b) f

low

s in

conn

ecte

d su

rface

wat

erbo

dies

; c)

flo

ws o

f the

Nga

ruro

ro R

iver

;

Page 117: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A33

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

in p

arts

(a) t

o (e

).

In

addi

tion,

w

ith

one

exce

ptio

n,

the

prop

osed

ap

proa

ches

to

man

agin

g an

d m

onito

ring

adve

rse

effe

cts

outli

ned

in p

arts

(f)

to (

j) al

so r

epre

sent

an

appr

opria

te r

esou

rce

man

agem

ent

appr

oach

. T

he

exce

ptio

n,

or

conc

ern,

th

at

Rave

nsdo

wn

has

in

rela

tion

to t

hese

app

roac

hes,

is th

at p

art

(f) o

f th

e po

licy

stat

es t

hat

new

wat

er u

ses

will

be

avoi

ded,

th

us

infe

rrin

g pr

ohib

ited

activ

ity

stat

us.

W

hile

re

stric

ting

such

take

s may

be

appr

opria

te, p

rohi

bitin

g th

em w

ithou

t con

sider

atio

n of

the

pote

ntia

l effe

cts o

f th

e ta

ke a

nd p

oten

tial m

itiga

tion

mea

sure

s is

not a

n ap

prop

riate

reso

urce

man

agem

ent a

ppro

ach.

Fi

nally

, it i

s con

sider

ed th

at p

art (

k) o

f the

pol

icy is

not

ne

eded

as

sect

ion

79 o

f th

e RM

A sp

ecifi

es w

hen

regi

onal

(and

dist

rict)

plan

s ar

e to

be

revi

ewed

and

th

ere

is no

nee

d to

repe

at th

ese

legi

slativ

e pr

ovisi

ons.

d) g

roun

dwat

er

qual

ity

thro

ugh

risks

of

se

a w

ater

intr

usio

n an

d w

ater

abs

trac

tion;

e)

tik

anga

and

māt

aura

nga

Māo

ri;

and

will

ado

pt a

stag

ed a

ppro

ach

to g

roun

dwat

er

man

agem

ent t

hat i

nclu

des;

f)

avoi

ding

miti

gatin

g fu

rthe

r adv

erse

effe

cts b

y no

t allo

win

g re

stric

ting

new

wat

er u

se

g) r

educ

ing

exist

ing

leve

ls of

wat

er u

se;

h) m

itiga

ting

the

adve

rse

effe

cts o

f gro

undw

ater

ab

stra

ctio

n on

flo

ws

in

conn

ecte

d w

ater

bo

dies

; i)

gath

erin

g in

form

atio

n ab

out a

ctua

l wat

er u

se

and

its e

ffect

s on

stre

am d

eple

tion;

j)

mon

itorin

g th

e ef

fect

iven

ess

of s

trea

m f

low

m

aint

enan

ce

and

habi

tat

enha

ncem

ent

sche

mes

; k)

in

clud

ing

plan

rev

iew

dire

ctio

ns t

o as

sess

ef

fect

iven

ess o

f the

se m

easu

res.

38

Polic

y 37

25

Su

ppor

t in

part

Th

is po

licy

is re

leva

nt to

Rav

ensd

own’

s Nap

ier W

orks

as

it

is lo

cate

d in

th

e HP

GMU

and

it ta

kes

grou

ndw

ater

for u

se w

ithin

the

site.

Th

is po

licy

outli

nes

the

fram

ewor

k fo

r the

allo

catio

n an

d m

anag

emen

t of t

he u

se o

f gro

undw

ater

from

the

HPGM

U.

This

inclu

des

the

iden

tifica

tion

of

an

allo

catio

n lim

it, w

hich

Sch

edul

e 31

iden

tifie

s as b

eing

fu

lly a

lloca

ted

to e

xist

ing u

sers

onl

y (i.e

., in

cludi

ng th

e Na

pier

Wor

ks).

Sub

ject

to

refin

emen

t of

som

e el

emen

ts o

f th

e pr

opos

al, R

aven

sdow

n is

gene

rally

su

ppor

tive

of th

e m

anag

emen

t app

roac

h ou

tline

d in

th

is po

licy,

inc

ludi

ng t

he r

equi

rem

ent

that

whe

n co

nsen

ts a

re r

enew

ed (

or r

evie

wed

as

prop

osed

in

Amen

d Po

licy

37 a

s fol

low

s:

In

man

agin

g th

e al

loca

tion

and

use

of

grou

ndw

ater

in

the

Here

taun

ga P

lain

s W

ater

M

anag

emen

t Uni

t, th

e Co

uncil

will

; a)

ado

pt a

n in

terim

allo

catio

n lim

it of

90

mill

ion

cubi

c met

ers p

er y

ear b

ased

on

the

actu

al a

nd

reas

onab

le w

ater

use

prio

r to

2017

; b)

avo

id m

inim

ise re

-allo

catio

n of

any

wat

er th

at

mig

ht b

ecom

e av

aila

ble

with

in t

he i

nter

im

grou

ndw

ater

allo

catio

n lim

it or

with

in t

he

limit

of a

ny c

onne

cted

wat

er b

ody

until

ther

e

Page 118: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A34

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

the

polic

y)

that

an

as

sess

men

t of

ac

tual

an

d re

ason

able

use

of

the

wat

er b

eing

tak

en w

ill b

e re

quire

d (re

fer t

o pa

rt (d

)(ii)

of th

e po

licy)

.

How

ever

, whi

le s

uppo

rtin

g th

is po

licy,

Rav

ensd

own

has c

once

rns a

bout

som

e of

the

wor

ding

use

d. T

hese

co

ncer

ns a

re a

s fol

low

s:

- Pa

rt (b

) of t

he p

olicy

, as

notif

ied,

iden

tifie

s th

at

re-a

lloca

tion

of w

ater

, whe

n it

beco

mes

ava

ilabl

e,

will

be

avoi

ded

until

a r

evie

w o

f th

e al

loca

tion

limit

has o

ccur

red.

The

use

of t

he te

rm ‘a

void

' is

prob

lem

atic

as it

infe

rs a

tota

l pro

hibi

tion,

whe

n in

re

ality

re

-allo

catio

n m

ay

repr

esen

t a

sust

aina

ble

use

of a

n av

aila

ble

wat

er re

sour

ce.

In

addi

tion,

as

stat

ed a

bove

(i.e

., re

fer

to P

olicy

36

abov

e -

Sub.

Ref

. 37)

, ref

eren

ce t

o pl

an r

evie

w

proc

esse

s is c

onsid

ered

unn

eces

sary

; -

In p

art (

c), t

he p

olicy

sta

tes

that

new

allo

catio

ns

of g

roun

dwat

er w

ill b

e pr

even

ted.

Gi

ven

that

w

ater

with

in th

e al

loca

tion

may

be

avai

labl

e (a

s st

ated

in p

art

(b) o

f the

pol

icy),

it is

cons

ider

ed

that

new

allo

catio

ns s

houl

d be

rest

ricte

d, ra

ther

th

an p

reve

nted

.

has

been

a r

evie

w o

f th

e re

leva

nt a

lloca

tion

limits

with

in th

is pl

an;

c)

man

age

the

Here

taun

ga

Plai

ns

Wat

er

Man

agem

ent

Unit

as

an

over

-allo

cate

d m

anag

emen

t un

it an

d pr

even

t re

stric

t an

y ne

w a

lloca

tions

of g

roun

dwat

er;

d) w

hen

cons

ider

ing

appl

icatio

ns i

n re

spec

t of

ex

istin

g co

nsen

ts d

ue f

or e

xpiry

, or

whe

n re

view

ing

cons

ents

, to;

(i)

allo

cate

gro

undw

ater

the

bas

is of

the

m

axim

um q

uant

ity t

hat

is ab

le t

o be

ab

stra

cted

dur

ing

each

yea

r or

irrig

atio

n se

ason

exp

ress

ed in

cubi

c m

eter

s per

yea

r; (ii

) ap

ply

an

asse

ssm

ent

of

actu

al

and

reas

onab

le u

se t

hat

refle

cts

land

use

and

w

ater

use

aut

horis

ed in

the

ten

year

s up

to

Augu

st 2

017

(exc

ept a

s pr

ovid

ed b

y Po

licy

50);

e)

miti

gate

stre

am d

eple

tion

effe

cts o

n lo

wla

nd

stre

ams

by

prov

idin

g fo

r st

ream

flo

w

mai

nten

ance

an

d ha

bita

t en

hanc

emen

t sc

hem

es.

39

Polic

y 38

25

O

ppos

e Th

e po

licy

reite

rate

s par

ts o

f Pol

icy 3

7 (re

fer a

bove

–

Sub.

Ref

. 38)

in te

rms o

f the

app

roac

h to

re-a

lloca

tion

of w

ater

and

on

this

basis

is co

nsid

ered

unn

eces

sary

. In

ter

ms

of t

he t

imin

g ou

tline

d in

thi

s po

licy,

the

gu

idan

ce

is al

so

cons

ider

ed

unne

cess

ary.

For

exam

ple,

whe

n it

is tim

e to

rene

w th

e co

nsen

t, th

en

the

mat

ters

cur

rent

ly o

utlin

ed in

thi

s po

licy

will

be

cons

ider

ed a

s th

ey w

ill b

e pa

rt o

f the

pla

n. I

n te

rms

of t

he r

evie

w o

f co

nsen

ts, s

ectio

n 12

8(1)

(a)

of t

he

Dele

te P

olicy

38

in it

s ent

irety

. Th

e Co

uncil

will

rest

rict t

he re

-allo

catio

n of

wat

er

to h

olde

rs o

f per

mits

to ta

ke a

nd u

se w

ater

in th

e He

reta

unga

W

ater

M

anag

emen

t Un

it iss

ued

befo

re 2

May

202

0 an

d w

ill r

evie

w p

erm

its o

r al

loca

te w

ater

acc

ordi

ng to

the

plan

pol

icies

and

ru

les e

ither

: a)

upo

n ex

piry

of t

he co

nsen

t; or

Page 119: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A35

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

RMA

requ

ires

the

reas

on f

or s

uch

a re

view

to

be

spec

ified

in

the

cons

ent

itsel

f. O

n th

is ba

sis,

this

polic

y is

cons

ider

ed u

nnec

essa

ry a

nd ca

n be

del

eted

.

b) i

n ac

cord

ance

with

a r

evie

w o

f all

appl

icabl

e pe

rmits

with

in t

en y

ears

of

<the

ope

rativ

e da

te>;

w

hich

ever

is th

e so

oner

.

Flow

mai

nten

ance

40

Polic

y 39

26

Su

ppor

t Th

is po

licy

is re

leva

nt to

Rav

ensd

own’

s Nap

ier W

orks

as

it

is lo

cate

d in

th

e HP

GMU

and

it ta

kes

grou

ndw

ater

for u

se w

ithin

the

site.

Su

bjec

t to

the

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

prio

rity

orde

r fo

r ces

satio

n of

wat

er ta

kes,

as o

utlin

ed in

Pol

icy 5

1 (re

fer

belo

w –

Sub

. Ref

. 46)

, Rav

ensd

own

cons

ider

s th

at t

his

polic

y’s

aim

to

ensu

re t

hat

grou

ndw

ater

ta

kes

avoi

d, r

emed

y or

miti

gate

adv

erse

effe

cts

on

the

flow

regi

mes

of c

onne

cted

sur

face

wat

erbo

dies

, in

cludi

ng d

urin

g lo

w fl

ow si

tuat

ions

, is a

ppro

pria

te.

W

hile

sup

port

ing

the

polic

y, s

ome

amen

dmen

ts a

re

requ

este

d. I

n ad

ditio

n to

a n

umbe

r of

gra

mm

atica

l am

endm

ents

, it

is al

so c

onsid

ered

tha

t co

nsen

t ap

plica

nts

shou

ld

be

enco

urag

ed,

rath

er

than

en

able

d, i

n te

rms

of c

ontr

ibut

ing

to s

trea

m f

low

m

aint

enan

ce

and

habi

tat

enha

ncem

ent

sche

mes

(p

art (

a)(ii

) of t

he p

olicy

).

Amen

d Po

licy

39 a

s fol

low

s:

Whe

n as

sess

ing

appl

icatio

ns to

take

gro

undw

ater

in

the

Her

etau

nga

Plai

ns W

ater

Man

agem

ent

Unit

the

Coun

cil w

ill:

a) e

ither

; (i)

req

uire

ab

stra

ctio

n to

ce

ase

whe

n an

ap

plica

ble

stre

am

flow

m

aint

enan

ce

sche

me

trig

ger i

s rea

ched

; or

(ii)

enab

le e

ncou

rage

con

sent

app

lican

ts t

o de

velo

p or

co

ntrib

ute

to

stre

am

flow

m

aint

enan

ce a

nd h

abita

t en

hanc

emen

t sc

hem

es th

at;

1.

cont

ribut

e flo

w to

low

land

rive

rs w

here

gr

ound

wat

er a

bstr

actio

n is

depl

etin

g st

ream

flow

s; a

nd

2.

impr

ove

oxyg

en

leve

ls an

d re

duce

w

ater

tem

pera

ture

s;

b) a

sses

s th

e re

lativ

e th

e co

ntrib

utio

n to

str

eam

de

plet

ion

from

gro

undw

ater

take

s and

requ

ire

stre

am d

eple

tion

to b

e of

f-set

equ

itabl

y by

co

nsen

t hol

ders

whi

le p

rovi

ding

for e

xcep

tions

fo

r th

e us

e of

wat

er f

or e

ssen

tial

hum

an

heal

th; a

nd

c)

enab

le p

erm

it ho

lder

s to

pro

gres

sivel

y an

d co

llect

ivel

y, t

hrou

gh W

ater

Use

r Co

llect

ives

,

Page 120: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A36

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

deve

lop

and

impl

emen

t flo

w m

aint

enan

ce a

nd

habi

tat

enha

ncem

ent

sche

mes

as

w

ater

pe

rmits

are

repl

aced

or r

evie

wed

, in

the

orde

r co

nsist

ent w

ith w

ater

per

mit

expi

ry d

ates

.

41

Polic

y 41

26

Su

ppor

t Th

is po

licy

is re

leva

nt to

Rav

ensd

own’

s Nap

ier W

orks

as

it

is lo

cate

d in

th

e HP

GMU

and

it ta

kes

grou

ndw

ater

for u

se w

ithin

the

site.

Th

e pr

opos

ed

inve

stig

atio

n,

and

pote

ntia

l im

plem

enta

tion,

of o

ptio

ns fo

r rem

edia

tion

of st

ream

de

plet

ion

effe

cts o

utlin

ed in

this

polic

y is

supp

orte

d.

If su

ch o

ptio

ns a

re f

easib

le,

it m

ay m

ean

that

co

ntin

ued

acce

ss t

o w

ater

by

exist

ing

cons

ente

d w

ater

use

rs,

such

as

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s Na

pier

Wor

ks,

may

not

be

undu

ly re

stric

ted.

Reta

in P

olicy

41

as n

otifi

ed.

Grou

ndw

ater

man

agem

ent r

evie

w

42

Polic

y 42

27

O

ppos

e Th

is pr

opos

ed p

olicy

out

lines

mat

ters

to

cons

ider

du

ring

futu

re p

lan

revi

ews.

Whi

le t

his

may

be

of

assis

tanc

e fo

r res

ourc

e us

ers,

it is

cons

ider

ed th

at th

e po

licy

is no

t ne

eded

and

sho

uld

be d

elet

ed.

The

re

quire

men

t to

rev

iew

pla

ns u

nder

the

RM

A ev

ery

ten

year

s is

stat

ed i

n se

ctio

n 79

of

the

RMA.

In

ad

ditio

n, th

e sc

ope

of a

ny re

view

s un

dert

aken

in th

e fu

ture

will

not

and

sho

uld

not

be c

onst

rain

ed b

y ex

istin

g pr

ovisi

ons o

f pla

ns, s

uch

as th

is po

licy.

Dele

te P

olicy

42

in it

s ent

irety

. Af

ter

wat

er h

as b

een

re-a

lloca

ted

and

cons

ents

re

view

ed in

acc

orda

nce

with

Pol

icies

36

- 38,

the

Coun

cil

will

co

mm

ence

a

revi

ew

of

thes

e pr

ovisi

ons w

ithin

ten

year

s of <

oper

ativ

e da

te>

in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith S

ectio

n 79

of t

he R

MA

and

will

de

term

ine:

a)

the

am

ount

of w

ater

allo

cate

d in

rel

atio

n to

th

e in

terim

allo

catio

n lim

it;

b) t

he to

tal a

nnua

l met

ered

gro

undw

ater

use

for

the

Here

taun

ga P

lain

s W

ater

Man

agem

ent

Unit

durin

g th

e te

n ye

ars

prio

r to

the

time

of

revi

ew;

Page 121: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A37

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

c)

if an

y ch

ange

s in

the

rel

atio

nshi

p be

twee

n gr

ound

wat

er a

bstr

actio

n an

d th

e flo

ws

of

river

s and

gro

undw

ater

leve

ls ha

ve o

ccur

red;

d)

the

ext

ent

of a

ny s

trea

m f

low

mai

nten

ance

an

d ha

bita

t en

hanc

emen

t sc

hem

es in

cludi

ng

in re

latio

n to

; (i)

the

le

ngth

of

st

ream

su

bjec

t to

flo

w

mai

nten

ance

; (ii

) th

e ex

tent

of

ha

bita

t en

hanc

emen

t in

clud

ing

leng

th

of

ripar

ian

mar

gin

impr

ovem

ents

, an

d ne

w

or

impr

oved

w

etla

nds;

(ii

) th

e m

agni

tude

and

dur

atio

n of

str

eam

flo

w m

aint

enan

ce sc

hem

e op

erat

ion;

(ii

i) tr

ends

oxy

gen

and

tem

pera

ture

leve

ls in

af

fect

ed st

ream

s.

And

will

; e)

In

rela

tion

to p

lan

obje

ctiv

es a

nd a

dver

se

effe

cts l

isted

in P

olicy

36,

ass

ess;

(i)

the

effe

cts

of t

he g

roun

dwat

er t

akes

on

stre

am fl

ows;

(ii

) ef

fect

iven

ess

of s

trea

m fl

ow m

aint

enan

ce

sche

mes

in m

aint

aini

ng w

ater

flo

ws

and

impr

ovin

g w

ater

qua

lity;

(ii

i) ef

fect

iven

ess

of

habi

tat

enha

ncem

ent

incl

udin

g th

roug

h im

prov

ed

ripar

ian

man

agem

ent

and

wet

land

cr

eatio

n in

m

eetin

g fre

shw

ater

obj

ectiv

es;

f) re

view

the

app

ropr

iate

ness

of

the

allo

catio

n lim

it in

rela

tion

to th

e fre

shw

ater

obj

ectiv

es;

Page 122: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A38

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

g) d

evel

op a

pla

n ch

ange

to

ensu

re a

ny o

ver-

allo

catio

n is

phas

ed o

ut.

Sect

ion

5.10

.7 –

Pol

icie

s: S

urfa

ce W

ater

Low

Flo

w M

anag

emen

t

Wat

er U

se a

nd A

lloca

tion

- Effi

cien

cy

43

Polic

y 46

29

Su

ppor

t Pr

ovid

ing

for t

he a

lloca

tion

of w

ater

in a

man

ner t

hat

ensu

res t

he k

now

n se

curit

y of

supp

ly is

pro

vide

d fo

r, al

ong

with

the

nee

d to

mee

t ac

tual

and

rea

sona

ble

wat

er u

se re

quire

men

ts, i

s app

ropr

iate

. Rav

ensd

own

also

cons

ider

s tha

t pro

vidi

ng fl

exib

ility

for w

ater

use

rs

(suc

h as

th

e Na

pier

W

orks

), w

ithin

lim

its,

and

colle

ctin

g da

ta o

n w

ater

use

and

mon

itorin

g w

ater

re

sour

ces i

s an

impo

rtan

t com

pone

nt o

f con

tinui

ng to

al

loca

te w

ater

sus

tain

ably

. Fo

r th

ese

reas

ons,

this

polic

y is

supp

orte

d.

Reta

in P

olicy

46

as n

otifi

ed.

44

Polic

y 47

29

Su

ppor

t In

the

con

text

of

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s op

erat

ions

at

its

Napi

er W

orks

and

Sev

ern

Stre

et st

ore,

and

the

wat

er

use

at

thes

e sit

es,

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

th

e re

quire

men

ts to

ado

pt g

ood

prac

tice

to e

nsur

e w

ater

is

used

effi

cient

ly, t

o m

eter

the

use

of w

ater

and

to

ensu

re th

at th

e sit

e’s w

ater

syst

ems a

re a

ppro

pria

tely

m

aint

aine

d.

Fo

r th

ese

reas

ons,

this

polic

y is

supp

orte

d.

Reta

in P

olicy

47

as n

otifi

ed.

Wat

er A

lloca

tion

– Pe

rmit

Dura

tion

45

Polic

y 49

30

O

ppos

e It

is re

cogn

ised

that

pro

vidi

ng f

or a

co-

ordi

nate

d re

view

of

re

sour

ce

use

activ

ities

on

a

wat

er

man

agem

ent z

one

basis

, as

prop

osed

by

this

polic

y,

can

be a

dvan

tage

ous,

part

icula

rly fo

r Cou

ncil.

Ho

wev

er, f

rom

a re

sour

ce u

ser’s

per

spec

tive,

lim

iting

co

nsen

t dur

atio

ns, c

an b

e pr

oble

mat

ic.

The

time

and

cost

s ass

ocia

ted

with

gai

ning

a re

sour

ce

Amen

d Po

licy

49 a

s fol

low

s:

Whe

n m

akin

g de

cisio

ns a

bout

app

licat

ions

for

re

sour

ce c

onse

nt t

o ta

ke a

nd u

se w

ater

, th

e Co

uncil

will

set c

omm

on e

xpiry

dat

es, o

r inc

lude

a

revi

ew c

ondi

tion,

for w

ater

per

mits

to ta

ke w

ater

in

eac

h w

ater

man

agem

ent

zone

, th

at e

nabl

es

cons

isten

t an

d ef

ficie

nt

man

agem

ent

of

the

Page 123: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A39

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

cons

ent c

an b

e sig

nific

ant.

Bei

ng re

quire

d to

repe

at

such

pro

cess

es e

very

15

year

s, pa

rticu

larly

whe

n th

e ef

fect

s of a

n ac

tivity

are

min

or o

r min

imal

, is u

nfai

r.

Also

, lar

ger b

usin

esse

s, su

ch a

s Rav

ensd

own’

s Nap

ier

Wor

ks, w

hich

hav

e in

vest

ed si

gnifi

cant

ly in

thei

r site

s, re

quire

sec

urity

tha

t th

ey c

an c

ontin

ue t

o op

erat

e an

d ce

rtai

nty

in o

rder

to

be a

ble

to m

ake

futu

re

decis

ions

on

in

vest

men

t an

d/or

th

e na

ture

of

op

erat

ions

at

such

site

s. S

hort

er-te

rm r

esou

rce

cons

ents

can

affe

ct th

e ce

rtai

nty

and

secu

rity

arou

nd

the

abili

ty to

cont

inue

to o

pera

te o

r exp

and.

For

the

abov

e re

ason

s, Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

fle

xibi

lity

shou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed w

here

by a

rev

iew

co

nditi

on t

hat

alig

ns w

ith t

he p

ropo

sed

com

mon

ex

piry

dat

es is

also

an

optio

n.

reso

urce

and

will

set

dur

atio

ns t

hat

prov

ide

a pe

riodi

c op

port

unity

to

revi

ew e

ffect

s of

the

cu

mul

ativ

e w

ater

use

and

to

take

into

acc

ount

po

tent

ial e

ffect

s of c

hang

es in

: a)

kno

wle

dge

abou

t the

wat

er b

odie

s;

b) o

ver-a

lloca

tion

of w

ater

; c)

pa

tter

ns o

f wat

er u

se;

d) d

evel

opm

ent o

f new

tech

nolo

gy;

e) c

limat

e ch

ange

effe

cts;

f)

effic

acy

of f

low

enh

ance

men

t sc

hem

es a

nd

any

ripar

ian

mar

gin

upgr

ades

; an

d th

e Co

uncil

; g)

will

impo

se c

onse

nt d

urat

ions

of 1

5 ye

ars,

or

impo

se re

view

con

ditio

ns re

flect

ing

the

sam

e tim

efra

me,

ac

cord

ing

to

spec

ified

w

ater

m

anag

emen

t uni

t exp

iry d

ates

. Fu

ture

dat

es

for

expi

ry o

r re

view

of

cons

ents

with

in t

hat

catc

hmen

t are

eve

ry 1

5 ye

ars t

here

afte

r.

h) w

ill im

pose

a c

onse

nt d

urat

ion

for

mun

icipa

l su

pply

cons

isten

t with

the

mos

t rec

ent H

PUDS

an

d w

ill im

pose

con

sent

revi

ew re

quire

men

ts

that

alig

n w

ith th

e ex

piry

of a

ll ot

her c

onse

nts

in th

e ap

plica

ble

man

agem

ent u

nit;

i)

may

gra

nt c

onse

nts

gran

ted

with

in t

hree

ye

ars p

rior t

o th

e re

leva

nt co

mm

on ca

tchm

ent

expi

ry d

ate

with

a d

urat

ion

to a

lign

with

the

se

cond

com

mon

exp

iry o

r re

view

con

ditio

n da

te, e

xcep

t w

here

the

app

licat

ion

is su

bjec

t to

sect

ion

8.2.

4 of

the

RRM

P).

Page 124: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A40

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

Wat

er A

lloca

tion

- Prio

rity

46

Polic

y 51

31

Su

ppor

t in

part

Th

is po

licy

is po

tent

ially

of

re

leva

nce

to

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s Na

pier

Wor

ks g

iven

tha

t it

take

s gr

ound

wat

er fo

r use

with

in th

e sit

e.

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

aim

of

this

polic

y, a

nd

cons

ider

s tha

t the

prio

rity o

rder

pro

pose

d is

gene

rally

ap

prop

riate

. Th

is in

clude

s ens

urin

g th

e w

ater

that

is

esse

ntia

l for

the

con

tinue

d op

erat

ion

of a

bus

ines

s, w

hich

inc

lude

s co

mm

ercia

l an

d in

dust

rial

activ

ities

un

der

the

HBRR

MP

defin

ition

fo

r ‘b

usin

ess’,

is

prov

ided

for a

s a m

atte

r of p

riorit

y.

Whi

le s

uppo

rtin

g th

e po

licy,

am

endm

ents

to

Part

s (e

), (f)

and

(g)

are

pro

pose

d to

cla

rify

wha

t th

e ac

tiviti

es a

re th

at th

e po

licy

is re

ferr

ing

to.

Amen

d Po

licy

51 a

s fol

low

s:

Whe

n m

akin

g w

ater

sho

rtag

e di

rect

ions

und

er

Sect

ion

329

of t

he R

MA,

occ

urrin

g w

hen

river

s ha

ve fa

llen

belo

w m

inim

um fl

ows

and

wat

er u

se

has

decr

ease

d or

cea

sed

acco

rdin

g to

per

mit

cond

ition

s, th

e Co

uncil

will

est

ablis

h an

d co

nsul

t w

ith a

n em

erge

ncy

wat

er m

anag

emen

t gr

oup

that

sha

ll ha

ve r

epre

sent

ativ

es f

rom

Nap

ier

City

an

d Ha

stin

gs D

istric

t Co

unci

ls, N

Z Fi

re S

ervi

ce,

DHB,

iw

i an

d M

PI,

to m

ake

decis

ions

abo

ut

prov

idin

g fo

r wat

er u

ses

in th

e fo

llow

ing

prio

rity

orde

r;

a) w

ater

for t

he m

aint

enan

ce o

f pub

lic h

ealth

; b)

wat

er

nece

ssar

y fo

r th

e m

aint

enan

ce

of

anim

al w

elfa

re;

c)

wat

er e

ssen

tial f

or c

omm

unity

wel

l-bei

ng a

nd

heal

th;

d) w

ater

ess

entia

l fo

r su

rviv

al o

f ho

rtic

ultu

ral

tree

crop

s;

e) u

ses w

here

wat

er u

ses i

s sub

ject

to re

quire

d to

m

eet

the

seas

onal

dem

ands

for

of

prim

ary

prod

uctio

n;

f) us

es f

or w

hich

wat

er i

s es

sent

ial

for

the

cont

inue

d op

erat

ion

of

a bu

sines

s (c

omm

erci

al o

r ind

ustr

ial a

ctiv

ity) a

nd p

rimar

y pr

oduc

tion

not

prov

ided

for

by

(e)

abov

e. ,

ex

cept

whe

re w

ater

is

subj

ect

to s

easo

nal

dem

and

for p

rimar

y pr

oduc

tion

or p

roce

ssin

g.

Page 125: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A41

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

The

follo

win

g us

es w

ill n

ot b

e au

thor

ised

unde

r a

wat

er sh

orta

ge d

irect

ion:

g)

use

of w

ater

not

ass

ocia

ted

with

the

cont

inue

d op

erat

ion

of

a bu

sines

s (c

omm

erci

al

or

indu

stria

l act

ivity

) or c

omm

unity

wel

l-bei

ng;

h) n

on-e

ssen

tial

amen

ity u

ses

such

as

priv

ate

swim

min

g po

ols a

nd ca

r was

hing

. Ta

kes n

ot su

bjec

t to

any

rest

rictio

ns a

re:

i) fir

efig

htin

g us

es;

j) no

n-co

nsum

ptiv

e us

es;

Ove

r-Allo

catio

n

47

Polic

y 52

31

-32

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

the

aim

of t

his p

olicy

to p

hase

ou

t ove

r-allo

catio

n th

roug

h th

e ra

nge

of a

ppro

ache

s ou

tline

d in

this

polic

y.

Rave

nsdo

wn,

as

a ho

lder

of

wat

er p

erm

its t

o ta

ke

grou

ndw

ater

for

its

Napi

er W

orks

, agr

ees

with

the

ne

ed,

whe

n se

ekin

g ne

w r

esou

rce

cons

ents

for

its

site,

to

dem

onst

rate

act

ual a

nd r

easo

nabl

e ne

ed o

f th

e w

ater

, as

wel

l as

the

requ

irem

ent t

o ad

opt g

ood

prac

tice

stan

dard

s and

use

wat

er e

fficie

ntly

. W

hile

gen

eral

ly s

uppo

rtin

g th

e po

licy,

am

endm

ents

ar

e re

ques

ted

to a

ddre

ss is

sues

rai

sed

in p

revi

ous

subm

issio

n po

ints

. T

he a

men

dmen

ts r

eque

sted

re

late

to:

- Pa

rts (

a) a

nd (f

) of t

he p

olicy

refe

r to

‘pre

vent

ing’

ne

w a

lloca

tions

of w

ater

and

site

to si

te tr

ansf

ers

unde

r spe

cifie

d cir

cum

stan

ces.

Pre

vent

ion

infe

rs

an a

bsol

ute

reso

urce

man

agem

ent

appr

oach

. Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

‘re

stric

ting’

su

ch

activ

ities

may

be

a m

ore

appr

opria

te a

ppro

ach.

Amen

d Po

licy

52 a

s fol

low

s:

The

Coun

cil w

ill p

hase

out

ove

r-al

loca

tion

by;

a) p

reve

ntin

g re

stric

ting

any

new

allo

catio

n of

w

ater

(n

ot

incl

udin

g an

y re

allo

catio

n in

re

spec

t of p

erm

its is

sued

bef

ore

2 M

ay 2

020)

; b)

for

app

licat

ions

in re

spec

t of e

xist

ing

cons

ents

du

e fo

r exp

iry o

r whe

n re

view

ing

cons

ents

, to;

(i)

allo

cate

wat

er a

ccor

ding

to d

emon

stra

ted

actu

al a

nd r

easo

nabl

e ne

ed (

exce

pt a

s pr

ovid

ed fo

r by

Polic

y 50

) (ii

) im

pose

con

ditio

ns t

hat

requ

ire e

fficie

ncy

gain

s to

be

m

ade,

in

clud

ing

thro

ugh

alte

ring

the

volu

me,

rate

or t

imin

g of

the

take

and

req

uest

ing

info

rmat

ion

to v

erify

ef

ficie

ncy

of w

ater

use

rela

tive

to in

dust

ry

good

pra

ctice

stan

dard

s;

c)

prov

ide

for,

with

in th

e du

ratio

n of

the

cons

ent

or re

view

cond

ition

s, m

eetin

g w

ater

effi

cienc

y

Page 126: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A42

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

Such

an

appr

oach

will

req

uire

con

sider

atio

n of

th

e ef

fect

s of t

he a

ctiv

ity (i

.e.,

it m

ay n

ot re

sult

in

over

-allo

catio

n,

or

the

effe

cts

may

be

de

m

inim

us) i

n th

e co

ntex

t of t

he p

olicy

fram

ewor

k of

PPC

9.

- Gi

ven

the

requ

este

d am

endm

ents

to

Polic

y 49

(S

ub.

Ref.

45),

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at t

his

polic

y al

so n

eeds

to

be a

men

ded

to r

efer

to

revi

ew c

ondi

tions

(as

wel

l as

the

dur

atio

n of

co

nsen

t).

stan

dard

s w

here

ha

rdsh

ip

can

be

dem

onst

rate

d;

d) r

educ

ing

the

amou

nt o

f wat

er p

erm

itted

to b

e ta

ken

with

out

cons

ent,

inclu

ding

th

ose

prov

ided

for b

y Se

ctio

n 14

(3)(b

) of t

he R

MA,

ex

cept

for

aut

horis

ed u

ses

exist

ing

befo

re 2

M

ay 2

020;

e)

enc

oura

ging

vol

unta

ry re

duct

ions

, site

to s

ite

tran

sfer

s (s

ubje

ct t

o cla

use

(f))

or p

rom

otin

g w

ater

aug

men

tatio

n/ha

rves

ting;

f)

prev

ent

rest

rict

site

to

site

tran

sfer

s of

al

loca

ted

but

unus

ed w

ater

tha

t do

es n

ot

mee

t th

e de

finiti

on o

f act

ual a

nd r

easo

nabl

e us

e;

g) e

nabl

ing

and

supp

ortin

g pe

rmit

hold

ers

to

deve

lop

flexi

ble

appr

oach

es t

o m

anag

emen

t an

d us

e of

al

loca

tabl

e w

ater

w

ithin

a

man

agem

ent

zone

in

clud

ing

thro

ugh

catc

hmen

t co

llect

ives

, w

ater

us

er

grou

ps,

cons

ent

or

wel

l sh

arin

g or

gl

obal

w

ater

pe

rmits

; h)

ena

blin

g an

d su

ppor

ting

the

rost

erin

g of

w

ater

use

or r

educ

ing

the r

ate

of ta

kes i

n or

der

to a

void

wat

er u

se re

stric

tions

at m

inim

um o

r tr

igge

r flo

ws.

Sect

ion

6.10

.1 -

Use

of P

rodu

ctio

n La

nd (N

ew R

egio

nal R

ules

)

48

Rule

TAN

K 1

- Use

of

Pro

duct

ion

Land

(P

erm

itted

Act

ivity

)

37

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

The

prop

osed

ne

w

TANK

ca

tchm

ent

perm

itted

ac

tivity

Rul

e TA

NK 1

per

mits

all

farm

ing

activ

ities

, on

a pr

oper

ty

grea

ter

than

10

ha,

whe

re

the

cond

ition

s/st

anda

rds/

term

s ca

n be

m

et.

Th

e co

nditi

ons i

nclu

de th

at le

ss th

an 7

5% o

f the

land

are

a

Amen

d pe

rmitt

ed a

ctiv

ity R

ule

TANK

1 b

y ch

angi

ng

the

land

are

a us

ed w

ithin

the

rule

from

10h

a, to

the

land

are

as t

hat

appl

y to

diff

eren

t fa

rmin

g ac

tiviti

es

unde

r the

NES

-F (R

egul

atio

n 8)

and

to w

hich

FFP

s will

be

req

uire

d by

way

of r

egul

atio

n in

the

nea

r fu

ture

Page 127: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A43

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

has

plan

tatio

n fo

rest

cov

er a

nd t

hat

the

prop

erty

is

eith

er p

art

of a

n In

dust

ry P

rogr

amm

e or

TAN

K Ca

tchm

ent

Colle

ctiv

e in

ac

cord

ance

w

ith

the

requ

irem

ents

of

Sc

hedu

les

28

and

30,

or

has

prep

ared

and

impl

emen

ted

a FE

P (a

lso in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

requ

irem

ents

of S

ched

ules

28

and

30),

whi

ch

is to

be

prov

ided

to C

ounc

il up

on re

ques

t. As

sta

ted

abov

e in

rel

atio

n to

va

rious

pol

icies

, Ra

vens

dow

n su

ppor

ts t

he p

ropo

sed

intr

oduc

tion

of

Indu

stry

Pro

gram

mes

, Ca

tchm

ent

Colle

ctiv

es a

nd

FEPs

as

a m

eans

of

farm

ing

activ

ities

ass

istin

g w

ith

achi

evin

g th

e fr

eshw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es a

nd o

ther

en

viro

nmen

tal o

bjec

tives

for

the

TAN

K ca

tchm

ents

. Pe

rmitt

ed a

ctiv

ity s

tatu

s fo

r fa

rmin

g ac

tiviti

es t

hat

com

ply

with

the

rul

e’s

cond

ition

s, is

cons

ider

ed

appr

opria

te.

It is

cons

ider

ed th

at th

e ab

ove

appr

oach

es g

ener

ally

re

flect

res

ourc

e m

anag

emen

t ap

proa

ches

tha

t ha

ve

been

, or a

re b

eing

, ado

pted

thro

ugho

ut N

ew Z

eala

nd

in re

gion

al p

lan

prov

ision

s for

farm

ing

activ

ities

.

How

ever

, for

the

purp

ose

of a

lignm

ent (

as d

iscus

sed

in p

arag

raph

1.1

0 of

thi

s su

bmiss

ion)

, Rav

ensd

own

cons

ider

s th

at

the

10ha

st

artin

g po

int

for

the

appl

icatio

n of

this

rule

sho

uld

be c

hang

ed to

ref

lect

th

e re

quire

men

ts o

f the

NES

-F (R

egul

atio

n 8)

and

the

RMAA

(se

ctio

n 21

7D).

Reg

ulat

ion

8 of

the

NES

-F

iden

tifie

s th

e m

inim

um

farm

siz

e,

for

diffe

rent

fa

rmin

g ac

tiviti

es,

that

th

e NE

S-F

stan

dard

s fo

r fa

rmin

g act

iviti

es a

pply

to. S

ectio

n 27

1D o

f the

RM

AA

is sim

ilar,

exce

pt th

at it

rela

tes t

o th

e m

inim

um fa

rm

sizes

whi

ch w

ill b

e re

quire

d to

hav

e a

FFP

in p

lace

. As

an

ove

rvie

w, t

he a

reas

are

5ha

for h

ortic

ultu

ral l

and

(sec

tion

271D

of t

he R

MAA

).

Page 128: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A44

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

use

and

20ha

for a

ll ot

her f

arm

ing

activ

ities

.

49

Rule

TAN

K 2

- Use

of

Pro

duct

ion

Land

(C

ontr

olle

d Ac

tivity

)

38

Opp

ose

This

prop

osed

ne

w

TANK

ca

tchm

ent

cont

rolle

d ac

tivity

Rul

e TA

NK 2

pro

vide

s for

farm

ing a

ctiv

ities

, on

a pr

oper

ty g

reat

er t

han

10ha

, whi

ch d

o no

t co

mpl

y w

ith C

ondi

tion

(b) o

f the

per

mitt

ed a

ctiv

ity R

ule

TANK

1

(i.e.

, w

here

the

y ar

e no

t pa

rt o

f an

Ind

ustr

y Pr

ogra

mm

e or

Cat

chm

ent C

olle

ctiv

e or

hav

e a

FEP

in

plac

e).

Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

it

is ap

prop

riate

tha

t fa

rmin

g act

iviti

es th

at d

o co

mpl

y with

Con

ditio

n (b

) of

the

perm

itted

act

ivity

rul

e (R

ule

TANK

1) s

houl

d be

re

quire

d to

se

ek

reso

urce

co

nsen

ts.

Ho

wev

er,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at r

estr

icted

disc

retio

nary

ra

ther

than

con

trol

led

activ

ity s

tatu

s w

ould

be

mor

e ap

prop

riate

, as

this

wou

ld g

ive

Coun

cil th

e ab

ility

to

decli

ne a

res

ourc

e co

nsen

t w

here

a f

arm

er i

s no

t w

illin

g to

mod

ify p

ract

ices.

In

add

ition

, as o

utlin

ed a

bove

in re

latio

n to

Rul

e TA

NK

1 (re

fer a

bove

– S

ub. R

ef. 4

8), R

aven

sdow

n co

nsid

ers

that

the

min

imum

farm

size

that

app

lies

to th

is ru

le

need

s to

be

amen

ded

to a

lign

with

the

RM

AA a

nd

NES-

F.

Fina

lly,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at t

he m

atte

rs o

f di

scre

tion,

giv

en t

he r

estr

icted

disc

retio

nary

act

ivity

st

atus

bei

ng r

eque

sted

, are

gen

eral

ly a

ppro

pria

te in

th

e co

ntex

t of s

uch

farm

ing

activ

ities

and

the

polic

y fra

mew

ork

of P

PC9.

How

ever

, a m

inor

am

endm

ent

to p

rovi

de fo

r te

rmin

olog

y co

nsist

ency

to

Mat

ter

of

Cont

rol/D

iscre

tion

1 ha

s bee

n re

ques

ted.

Amen

d co

ntro

lled

activ

ity R

ule

TANK

2 a

s fol

low

s:

- am

end

the

activ

ity s

tatu

s fro

m c

ontr

olle

d to

re

stric

ted

disc

retio

nary

; -

chan

ge t

he la

nd a

rea

used

with

in t

he r

ule

from

10

ha,

to t

he la

nd a

reas

tha

t ap

ply

to d

iffer

ent

farm

ing

activ

ities

und

er th

e NE

S-F

(Reg

ulat

ion

8)

and

to w

hich

FFP

s w

ill b

e re

quire

d by

way

of

regu

latio

n in

the

near

futu

re (s

ectio

n 27

1D o

f the

RM

AA);

and

-

amen

d M

atte

r for

Con

trol

/Disc

retio

n 1

as fo

llow

s:

1.

The

fresh

wat

er w

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es a

nd

targ

ets i

n Sc

hedu

le 2

6 fo

r …

50

Rule

TAN

K 5

- Use

of

Pro

duct

ion

Land

41

O

ppos

e Ru

le T

ANK

5 pu

ts in

pla

ce a

regu

lato

ry fr

amew

ork t

hat

seek

s to

ensu

re th

at th

ere

is no

furt

her d

eter

iora

tion

Dele

te co

ntro

lled

activ

ity R

ule

TANK

5 in

its e

ntire

ty.

Page 129: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A45

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

(Con

trol

led

Activ

ity)

of w

ater

qua

lity (

such

as n

utrie

nt lo

sses

) as a

resu

lt of

ch

angi

ng p

rodu

ctio

n la

nd u

ses.

Thi

s ru

le s

pecif

ically

re

late

s to

pro

duct

ion

land

whi

ch is

loca

ted

with

in a

Ca

tchm

ent C

olle

ctiv

e, a

s pro

vide

d fo

r with

in P

PC9.

In

rec

ogni

tion

of t

he p

oten

tial r

isks

asso

ciate

d w

ith

such

land

use

cha

nge,

whe

re th

e ch

ange

is to

a m

ore

inte

nsiv

e (n

ot le

ss in

tens

ive)

land

use

, Rav

ensd

own

supp

orts

regu

latin

g su

ch a

ctiv

ities

.

How

ever

, it

is co

nsid

ered

tha

t co

ntro

lled

activ

ity

stat

us, p

artic

ular

ly in

ligh

t of t

he n

ew re

gula

tion

that

ap

plie

s to

far

min

g in

tens

ifica

tion,

unt

il 1

Janu

ary

2025

, und

er th

e NE

S-F

(ref

er to

Reg

ulat

ions

15

to 2

5),

is no

t ap

prop

riate

.

The

NES-

F pr

ovid

es

for

agric

ultu

ral l

and

use

inte

nsifi

catio

n as

disc

retio

nary

ac

tiviti

es w

here

the

perm

itted

act

ivity

regu

latio

ns a

re

not

com

plie

d w

ith.

Giv

en t

his

natio

nal

dire

ctio

n,

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at

this

rule

sh

ould

be

de

lete

d, a

nd t

hat

the

chan

ge o

f us

e of

pro

duct

ion

land

, to

mor

e in

tens

ive

land

use

s, sh

ould

be

regu

late

d by

way

of a

disc

retio

nary

act

ivity

rul

e (re

fer

to R

ule

TANK

6 b

elow

– S

ub. R

ef. 5

1).

51

Rule

TAN

K 6

- Use

of

Pro

duct

ion

Land

(R

estr

icted

Di

scre

tiona

ry

Activ

ity)

42

Opp

ose

Rule

TAN

K 5,

put

s in

pla

ce a

reg

ulat

ory

fram

ewor

k th

at

seek

s to

en

sure

th

at

ther

e is

no

furt

her

dete

riora

tion

of w

ater

qua

lity

(suc

h as

nut

rient

lo

sses

) as

a re

sult

of c

hang

ing

prod

uctio

n la

nd u

ses.

Th

is ru

le, a

s not

ified

, spe

cifica

lly re

late

s to

chan

ges i

n th

e us

e of

pro

duct

ion

land

that

is n

ot p

rovi

ded

for b

y Ru

le T

ANK

5 (c

ontr

olle

d ac

tivity

) (i.

e.,

whe

re t

he

chan

ge o

f use

occ

urs o

utsid

e of

an

area

cov

ered

by

a Ca

tchm

ent

Colle

ctiv

e, a

nd w

here

mor

e th

an 1

0% o

f th

e pr

oper

ty o

r ent

erpr

ise a

rea

is ch

angi

ng).

Ra

vens

dow

n su

ppor

ts r

egul

atin

g su

ch a

ctiv

ities

to

Amen

d re

stric

ted

disc

retio

nary

act

ivity

Rul

e TA

NK 6

as

follo

ws:

-

amen

d th

e ru

le ti

tle a

s fol

low

s:

Chan

ge o

f Use

of P

rodu

ctio

n La

nd

- am

end

the

activ

ity

stat

us

from

re

stric

ted

disc

retio

nary

to d

iscre

tiona

ry;

- am

end

the

activ

ity d

escr

iptio

n as

follo

ws:

Th

e ch

angi

ng o

f a u

se o

f pro

duct

ion

land

to a

m

ore

inte

nsiv

e la

nd u

se a

ctiv

ity o

n fa

rm

prop

ertie

s or f

arm

ing

ente

rpris

es …

Page 130: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A46

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

man

age

the

pote

ntia

l risk

s ass

ocia

ted

with

such

land

us

e ch

ange

, whe

re th

e ch

ange

is to

a m

ore

inte

nsiv

e (n

ot le

ss in

tens

ive)

land

use

. Ho

wev

er, a

s di

scus

sed

abov

e in

rel

atio

n to

Rul

e TA

NK 5

(Su

b. R

ef.

50),

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at

this

rule

sh

ould

be

am

ende

d so

that

alig

ns w

ith th

e NE

S-F.

Thi

s ca

n be

ac

hiev

ed b

y ei

ther

am

endi

ng t

he r

ule

to r

efle

ct t

he

NES-

F, o

r de

letin

g th

e ru

le a

nd r

efer

ring

to o

r in

sert

ing

the

rele

vant

NES

-F re

gula

tions

.

If th

e ru

le is

to

be r

etai

ned,

oth

er c

once

rns

to b

e ad

dres

sed

with

in th

e ru

le a

re a

s fol

low

s:

- Th

e ‘a

ctiv

ity’ i

s a

‘Cha

nge

of U

se o

f Pr

oduc

tion

Land

’, no

t jus

t ‘Us

e of

Pro

duct

ion

Land

’. -

The

rule

cou

ld b

e re

ad t

o ap

ply

to a

ll la

nd u

se

chan

ge,

even

if

the

chan

ge w

as l

ess

inte

nsiv

e an

d/or

impl

emen

ted

as a

miti

gatio

n m

easu

re in

re

spon

se to

the

effe

cts

of th

e us

e of

pro

duct

ion

land

. It

is co

nsid

ered

that

this

is no

t the

inte

nt o

f th

e ru

le. T

o ad

dres

s thi

s iss

ue, i

t is s

ugge

sted

that

th

e ru

le s

houl

d cle

arly

ide

ntify

tha

t th

e ru

le

appl

ies t

o ch

ange

s to

mor

e in

tens

ive

land

use

s.

- in

sert

a n

ew ‘C

ondi

tions

/Sta

ndar

ds/T

erm

s’ th

at

refle

ct t

he c

ondi

tions

att

ache

d to

pe

rmitt

ed

activ

ity re

gula

tions

in P

art 1

, Sub

part

2 o

f the

NES

-F;

and

-

dele

te th

e M

atte

rs o

f Disc

retio

n.

Or,

alte

rnat

ivel

y, d

elet

e th

is ru

le an

d re

fer t

o or

inse

rt

the

NES-

F re

gula

tions

(Par

t 1, S

ubpa

rt 2

of t

he N

ES-F

).

Sect

ion

6.10

.2 –

Wat

er –

Tak

e an

d Us

e (N

ew R

egio

nal R

ules

)

52

Rule

TAN

K 9

- Gr

ound

wat

er T

ake

– He

reta

unga

Pla

ins

(Res

trict

ed

Disc

retio

nary

Ac

tivity

)

45

Supp

ort

This

rule

will

app

ly to

Rav

ensd

own

whe

n it

seek

s to

re

new

its

gro

undw

ater

tak

es a

t its

Nap

ier

Wor

ks.

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s th

at r

estr

icted

disc

retio

nary

ac

tivity

stat

us is

app

ropr

iate

.

In a

dditi

on,

give

n th

e ov

er-a

lloca

ted

stat

us o

f th

e Ta

nk c

atch

men

t’s w

ater

res

ourc

es,

inclu

ding

the

HP

GMU

from

w

hich

th

e Na

pier

W

orks

ta

kes

grou

ndw

ater

, the

nee

d to

see

k th

e am

ount

of w

ater

th

at r

efle

cts

an a

ctua

l an

d re

ason

able

am

ount

of

Reta

in re

stric

ted

disc

retio

nary

act

ivity

Rul

e TA

NK 9

as

notif

ied.

Page 131: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A47

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

wat

er is

app

ropr

iate

. In

the

case

of t

he N

apie

r Wor

ks,

actu

al a

nd r

easo

nabl

e us

e w

ill b

e dr

iven

by

the

prod

uctio

n ca

pacit

y of

the

site.

In

add

ition

, it

is co

nsid

ered

tha

t th

e m

atte

rs o

f di

scre

tion

are

appr

opria

te.

53

Rule

TAN

K 11

- Gr

ound

wat

er a

nd

Surfa

ce w

ater

take

(lo

w fl

ow)

(Disc

retio

nary

Ac

tivity

)

49

Supp

ort

This

rule

pro

vide

s fo

r the

take

of w

ater

, in

the

TANK

ca

tchm

ents

, whe

re th

e co

nditi

ons o

f Rul

es T

ANK

9 or

TA

NK 1

0 ar

e no

t com

plie

d w

ith.

As

sta

ted

prev

ious

ly,

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s gr

ound

wat

er

take

s at

its

Napi

er W

orks

are

fro

m t

he H

PGM

U, a

s id

entif

ied

in S

ched

ule

31E

of P

PC9.

Ra

vens

dow

n an

ticip

ates

that

whe

n se

ekin

g ne

w re

sour

ce co

nsen

ts

for t

hese

gro

undw

ater

take

s, th

at it

will

com

ply

with

th

e co

nditi

ons

of R

ule

TANK

9.

The

refo

re,

it is

antic

ipat

ed

that

th

is ru

le

will

no

t ap

ply

to

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s ope

ratio

ns.

Irres

pect

ive

of t

his

curr

ent

asse

ssm

ent,

shou

ld R

ule

TANK

9 n

ot a

pply

to R

aven

sdow

n’s

oper

atio

ns a

t its

Na

pier

Wor

ks, t

he d

iscre

tiona

ry a

ctiv

ity st

atus

of t

his

rule

is co

nsid

ered

app

ropr

iate

, as i

s Con

ditio

n (a

) tha

t id

entif

ies

that

the

take

is fo

r the

con

tinua

tion

of a

n ex

istin

g co

nsen

ted

take

and

use

. T

his

refle

cts

the

allo

catio

n st

atus

of

th

e He

reta

unga

Pl

ains

as

id

entif

ied

in S

ched

ule

31 (

i.e.,

fully

allo

cate

d to

ex

istin

g us

es).

Fo

r th

ese

reas

ons,

this

rule

is

cons

ider

ed a

ppro

pria

te.

Reta

in d

iscre

tiona

ry a

ctiv

ity R

ule

TANK

11

as n

otifi

ed.

Sect

ion

6.10

.3 –

Sto

rmw

ater

(New

Reg

iona

l Rul

es)

54

Rule

TAN

K 21

–

Stor

mw

ater

ac

tiviti

es

(Con

trol

led

Activ

ity)

54-5

6 Su

ppor

t Th

is ru

le p

rovi

des

for t

he d

iver

sion

and

disc

harg

e of

st

orm

wat

er fr

om s

torm

wat

er n

etw

orks

man

aged

by

a lo

cal a

utho

rity.

Th

is ru

le, i

n te

rms

of th

e co

nditi

ons

atta

ched

to it

, is

Amen

d co

ntro

lled

activ

ity R

ule

TANK

21

as fo

llow

s:

Cond

ition

s/St

anda

rds/

Term

s a)

The

div

ersio

n an

d di

scha

rge

shal

l not

:

Page 132: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A48

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

rele

vant

to R

aven

sdow

n’s

Seve

rn S

tree

t sto

re (i

.e.,

it is

conn

ecte

d to

a

loca

l au

thor

ity’s

stor

mw

ater

ne

twor

k).

Whi

le R

aven

sdow

n ge

nera

lly su

ppor

ts th

e ru

le,

ther

e ar

e iss

ues

with

the

man

ner

in w

hich

in

dust

rial

and

trad

e pr

emise

s ar

e ac

com

mod

ated

w

ithin

the

rule

that

Rav

ensd

own

cons

ider

s ne

eds

to

be a

ddre

ssed

. Co

nditi

on (a

)(iv)

spec

ifies

that

the

netw

ork

disc

harg

e ca

nnot

inclu

de a

div

ersio

n or

disc

harg

e fro

m a

site

th

at s

tore

s, us

es o

r tr

ansf

ers

haza

rdou

s su

bsta

nces

. Ar

eas

serv

iced

by

stor

mw

ater

ne

twor

ks

(i.e.

, de

velo

ped

land

are

as),

will

cont

ain

a m

ix o

f lan

d us

es

inclu

ding

in

dust

rially

zo

ned

land

w

hich

ac

com

mod

ates

a r

ange

of i

ndus

tria

l act

iviti

es w

hich

w

ill s

tore

, use

or

tran

sfer

haz

ardo

us s

ubst

ance

s. In

th

is co

ntex

t, it

is co

nsid

ered

that

rest

rictio

n on

suc

h sit

es sh

ould

be

rem

oved

.

In a

dditi

on, i

t is i

mpo

rtan

t to

reco

gnise

that

it m

ay b

e ch

alle

ngin

g fo

r suc

h sit

es to

ens

ure

that

sto

rmw

ater

di

scha

rges

do

not

cont

ain

abso

lute

ly a

ny h

azar

dous

su

bsta

nces

. F

or th

is re

ason

, the

pro

pose

d in

clusio

n of

co

nditi

ons

requ

iring

Si

te

Spec

ific

Stor

mw

ater

M

anag

emen

t Pla

ns, i

n ac

cord

ance

with

Sch

edul

e 33

(re

fer

to S

ub.

Ref.

63 b

elow

), fro

m i

ndus

tria

l an

d tr

ade

prem

ises,

as p

art

of a

n In

tegr

ated

Cat

chm

ent

Man

agem

ent

Plan

is

appr

opria

te

and

ther

efor

e su

ppor

ted

(Con

ditio

ns (b

)(v) t

o (v

ii)).

Whi

le

not

spec

ifica

lly

iden

tifie

d w

ithin

th

is su

bmiss

ion

poin

t, co

nsist

ent t

erm

inol

ogy

need

s to

be

appl

ied

thro

ugho

ut th

is ru

le (i

.e.,

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

).

…

(iv)

cont

ain

haza

rdou

s sub

stan

ces

or, b

e fro

m

a sit

e us

ed fo

r the

stor

age,

use

or t

rans

fer

of h

azar

dous

subs

tanc

es

…

Page 133: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A49

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

55

Rule

TAN

K 22

- St

orm

wat

er

activ

ities

(R

estr

icted

Di

scre

tiona

ry

Activ

ity)

57

Supp

ort

This

rule

pro

vide

s fo

r th

e di

scha

rge

of s

torm

wat

er

from

indu

stria

l or t

rade

pre

mise

s, su

bjec

t to

seve

ral

cond

ition

s, in

cludi

ng w

here

the

re is

no

retic

ulat

ed

stor

mw

ater

net

wor

k at

the

boun

dary

(Con

ditio

n (e

)).

This

rule

may

the

refo

re a

pply

to

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s st

orm

wat

er d

ischa

rges

from

its N

apie

r Wor

ks w

hen

it se

eks n

ew re

sour

ce co

nsen

ts fo

r thi

s asp

ect o

f its

site

op

erat

ions

. Rav

ensd

own

cons

ider

s tha

t the

cond

ition

at

tach

ed t

o th

is ru

le,

as w

ell

as t

he m

atte

rs o

f di

scre

tion

appr

opria

tely

ref

lect

the

nat

ure

of s

uch

stor

mw

ater

act

iviti

es,

the

actu

al a

nd/o

r po

tent

ial

effe

cts

and

the

man

agem

ent

and

miti

gatio

n m

easu

res

that

ca

n an

d sh

ould

be

ap

plie

d to

st

orm

wat

er d

ischa

rges

.

Whi

le su

ppor

ting

the

rule

, as n

oted

abo

ve in

rela

tion

to R

ule

TANK

21

(Sub

. Re

f. 54

), it

is im

port

ant

to

reco

gnise

tha

t it

may

be

chal

leng

ing

for

indu

stria

l sit

es,

such

as

the

Napi

er W

orks

, to

ens

ure

that

st

orm

wat

er d

ischa

rges

do

not c

onta

in a

bsol

utel

y an

y ha

zard

ous s

ubst

ance

s as r

equi

red

by C

ondi

tion

(b)(i

v)

of th

is ru

le.

Reta

in re

stric

ted

disc

retio

nary

act

ivity

Rul

e TA

NK 2

2 as

not

ified

.

56

Rule

TAN

K 23

- St

orm

wat

er

activ

ities

(D

iscre

tiona

ry

Activ

ity)

58

Opp

ose

in

part

Th

is ru

le p

rovi

des

for

stor

mw

ater

div

ersio

n an

d di

scha

rges

not

pro

vide

d fo

r by R

ules

TAN

K 19

to T

ANK

22 a

s a

disc

retio

nary

act

ivity

. Di

scre

tiona

ry a

ctiv

ity

stat

us fo

r suc

h di

scha

rges

is co

nsid

ered

app

ropr

iate

. Ra

vens

dow

n op

pose

th

e m

atte

rs

for

cont

rol/d

iscre

tion

liste

d un

der

this

rule

. Fi

rstly

, as

this

rule

has

a di

scre

tiona

ry st

atus

, it is

not

cons

ider

ed

appr

opria

te to

list

a m

atte

r for

con

trol

/disc

retio

n. I

n ad

ditio

n, th

e ‘m

atte

r for

disc

retio

n’, a

s pro

pose

d, a

re

effe

ctiv

ely

an a

dviso

ry n

ote.

Fi

nally

, und

er s

ectio

n

Amen

d di

scre

tiona

ry a

ctiv

ity R

ule

TANK

23

as fo

llow

s:

Cond

ition

s/St

anda

rds/

Term

s Th

e ac

tivity

doe

s no

t com

ply

with

Rul

es T

ANK

19

to T

ANK

22

Mat

ters

for C

ontr

ol/D

iscre

tion

The

Coun

cil m

ay a

t any

tim

e, b

y w

ritte

n no

tice

to

the

owne

r or

occ

upie

r (fo

llow

ing

a re

ason

able

pe

riod

of c

onsu

ltatio

n), r

evie

w a

con

sent

in li

ght

of n

ew in

form

atio

n th

at h

as b

ecom

e av

aila

ble

or

any

chan

ge in

circ

umst

ance

s th

at h

as o

ccur

red,

Page 134: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A50

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

128

of t

he R

MA,

unl

ess

a ne

w p

lann

ing

prov

ision

tr

igge

rs

a re

view

pr

oces

s (s

128(

b)

to

(bb)

), or

in

form

atio

n in

an

ap

plica

tion

was

in

accu

rate

(s

128(

c)),

a re

view

cond

ition

mus

t be

inclu

ded

on th

e co

nsen

t spe

cifyi

ng th

e pu

rpos

e of

the

revi

ew. F

or th

e ab

ove

reas

ons,

the

‘mat

ters

for

con

trol

/disc

retio

n’

shou

ld b

e de

lete

d.

and

vary

an

y co

nditi

on

of

cons

ent

as

a co

nseq

uenc

e.

Sect

ion

6.3.

3 - V

eget

atio

n Cl

eara

nce

and

Soil

Dist

urba

nce

Activ

ities

(Am

ende

d HB

RRP

Rule

s)

57

Rule

7 -

Vege

tatio

n cle

aran

ce a

nd so

il di

stur

banc

e (P

erm

itted

Act

ivity

)

64-6

5 Su

ppor

t in

part

PP

C9 p

ropo

ses

inse

rtin

g ne

w c

ondi

tions

int

o th

is re

gion

al

rule

, th

at

wou

ld

mea

n th

at

vege

tatio

n cle

aran

ce a

nd s

oil d

istur

banc

e (c

ultiv

atio

n) a

ctiv

ities

in

the

TANK

cat

chm

ents

with

in w

ater

body

set

bac

ks

and/

or o

n st

eepe

r la

nd a

re g

ener

ally

not

per

mitt

ed

unde

r th

is ru

le,

unle

ss

it is

part

of

rip

aria

n m

anag

emen

t ac

tiviti

es

spec

ified

in

a

FEP

or

Catc

hmen

t Co

llect

ive.

Thes

e re

stric

tions

ar

e co

nsid

ered

app

ropr

iate

and

are

ther

efor

e su

ppor

ted.

W

hile

the

cond

ition

s ar

e su

ppor

ted,

rath

er th

an ju

st

refe

rrin

g to

FEP

s an

d Ca

tchm

ent

Colle

ctiv

es,

it is

cons

ider

ed th

at th

e co

nditi

ons s

houl

d re

fer t

o th

e fu

ll su

ite o

f to

ols

prov

ided

for

by

Sche

dule

30

(i.e.

, in

cludi

ng In

dust

ry P

rogr

amm

es).

Reta

in n

ew C

ondi

tions

(f) t

o (i)

of R

ule

7 as

not

ified

, w

hile

mak

ing

the

follo

win

g am

endm

ent i

n Co

nditi

ons

(f)(i)

and

(i)(i

): …

Far

m E

nviro

nmen

t Pl

an, C

atch

men

t Co

llect

ive

Plan

or

In

dust

ry

Prog

ram

me

prep

ared

in

ac

cord

ance

with

Sch

edul

e 30

.

Sche

dule

s (N

ew)

58

Sche

dule

27

– Fr

eshw

ater

Qua

lity

Obj

ectiv

es

97 -

100

Opp

ose

This

sche

dule

cont

ains

long

er te

rm fr

eshw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es th

at a

pply

bey

ond

2040

. As o

utlin

ed a

bove

in

rela

tion

to O

BJ T

ANK

6 (re

fer t

o Su

b. R

ef. 4

abo

ve),

this

sche

dule

is

not

utili

sed

with

in t

he p

olicy

or

regu

lato

ry fr

amew

ork

of P

PC9

(exc

ept f

or O

BJ T

ANK

6).

OBJ

TAN

K 6,

whi

ch R

aven

sdow

n re

ques

ts i

s de

lete

d, s

olel

y id

entif

ies

that

the

fres

hwat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

con

tain

ed in

Sch

edul

e 27

will

be

achi

eved

Dele

te S

ched

ule

27 in

its e

ntire

ty.

And,

as

a co

nseq

uent

ial a

men

dmen

t, al

l ref

eren

ces

to S

ched

ule

27 w

ithin

PPC

9.

Page 135: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A51

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

thro

ugh

futu

re

plan

ch

ange

s.

On

this

basis

, Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

th

is sc

hedu

le

is un

nece

ssar

y an

d re

dund

ant a

nd th

eref

ore

shou

ld b

e de

lete

d.

In

requ

estin

g th

e de

letio

n of

th

is sc

hedu

le,

as

outli

ned

abov

e in

re

latio

n to

O

BJ

TANK

6,

Ra

vens

dow

n ac

know

ledg

es th

at C

ounc

il, a

s par

t of i

ts

requ

irem

ents

to im

plem

ent t

he N

PS-F

M20

20 m

ay se

t lo

ng t

erm

att

ribut

e st

ates

tha

t m

ay r

efle

ct t

he

fresh

wat

er q

ualit

y ob

ject

ives

cur

rent

ly c

onta

ined

in

Sche

dule

27.

Ho

wev

er, R

aven

sdow

n co

nsid

ers

that

th

e in

clusio

n of

long

-term

att

ribut

e st

ates

nee

ds to

be

dete

rmin

ed a

s pa

rt o

f a b

road

er N

OF

as o

utlin

ed in

Su

bpar

t 2

of t

he N

PS-F

M 2

020.

O

n th

is ba

sis, i

t is

cons

ider

ed t

hat

this

sche

dule

doe

s no

t ne

cess

arily

re

flect

suc

h lo

ng-te

rm a

ttrib

ute

stat

es a

s en

visa

ged

by th

e NS

P-FM

202

0.

59

Sche

dule

28

– Pr

iorit

y Ca

tchm

ents

10

1 Su

ppor

t in

part

/ O

ppos

e in

par

t

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

th

e id

entif

icatio

n,

and

subs

eque

nt u

se o

f prio

rity

catc

hmen

ts a

s a

plan

ning

to

ol to

be

used

to tr

igge

r a m

ore

focu

ssed

regu

lato

ry

fram

ewor

k to

ach

ieve

the

obje

ctiv

es o

f PPC

9. I

n th

is co

ntex

t, th

e id

entif

icatio

n of

hig

h, m

ediu

m a

nd lo

w

prio

rity c

atch

men

t, al

ong

with

ass

ocia

ted

timef

ram

es

for t

he a

pplic

atio

n of

the

regu

lato

ry fr

amew

ork

(i.e.

, 3,

6 o

r 9

year

s af

ter

PPC9

bec

omes

ope

rativ

e), a

re

also

supp

orte

d.

How

ever

, at p

rese

nt, R

aven

sdow

n co

nsid

ers t

hat t

he

sche

dule

is n

ot c

lear

in te

rms

of it

s in

tent

. Al

so, t

he

sche

dule

doe

s no

t sp

ecifi

cally

ide

ntify

the

prio

rity

catc

hmen

ts.

The

iden

tifica

tion

of th

e ac

tual

prio

rity

catc

hmen

ts, a

nd t

he t

imef

ram

es t

hat

appl

y to

eac

h ca

tchm

ent,

shou

ld b

e cle

arly

art

icula

ted

with

in t

his

Amen

d Sc

hedu

le 2

8 by

repl

acin

g th

e cu

rren

t con

tent

of

the

sch

edul

e w

ith a

tab

le o

r lis

t th

at c

lear

ly

iden

tifie

s th

e pr

iorit

y ca

tchm

ents

, in

cludi

ng

the

timef

ram

es th

at a

pply

with

in e

ach

catc

hmen

t.

Page 136: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A52

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

sche

dule

so

that

all

reso

urce

use

rs c

an u

nder

stan

d th

eir

oblig

atio

ns.

Re

quiri

ng

reso

urce

us

ers

to

inte

rpre

t th

e ‘w

ater

qua

lity

issue

s’ id

entif

ied

in t

he

sche

dule

, and

ass

ocia

ted

tabl

e, is

pro

blem

atic

as it

is

diffi

cult

to i

nter

pret

, un

ders

tand

and

to

appl

y to

sp

ecifi

c w

ater

bodi

es.

In

ad

ditio

n,

PPC9

sh

ould

in

clude

key

pro

visio

ns w

ithin

it, n

ot o

utsid

e of

the

pl

an ch

ange

itse

lf.

60

Sche

dule

29

- Lan

d Us

e Ch

ange

10

2 O

ppos

e It

is un

ders

tood

tha

t th

is sc

hedu

le, a

s pr

opos

ed, i

s at

tem

ptin

g to

pla

ce a

fra

mew

ork

arou

nd w

hat

a ch

ange

of u

se o

f pro

duct

ion

land

is u

nder

Rul

es T

ANK

5 an

d TA

NK 6

. Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

ther

e ar

e sig

nific

ant

issue

s w

ith t

his

sche

dule

and

tha

t, gi

ven

amen

dmen

ts s

ough

t by

Rave

nsdo

wn

to t

he ‘c

hang

e of

use

’ reg

ulat

ory f

ram

ewor

k (re

fer t

o Su

b. R

efs.

4, 5

0 an

d 51

), th

e sc

hedu

le is

unn

eces

sary

and

sho

uld

be

dele

ted.

The

amen

dmen

ts

bein

g so

ught

by

Ra

vens

dow

n re

volv

e ar

ound

the

need

for t

he la

nd u

se

chan

ge

prov

ision

s of

PP

C9

to

alig

n w

ith

the

agric

ultu

ral

inte

nsifi

catio

n re

gula

tions

in

the

NES-

F (re

fer

to P

art

1, S

ubpa

rt 2

of t

he N

ES-F

). G

iven

the

natu

re o

f the

reg

ulat

ory

fram

ewor

k ru

les

requ

este

d by

Rav

ensd

own,

thi

s sc

hedu

le is

not

long

er n

eede

d an

d sh

ould

be

dele

ted.

Ra

vens

dow

n al

so

note

s th

at

ther

e ar

e iss

ues

asso

ciate

d w

ith th

is sc

hedu

le a

s no

tifie

d. T

he is

sues

in

clude

, but

are

not

lim

ited

to:

- W

hile

Rav

ensd

own’

s con

sider

s tha

t Ove

rsee

r can

ha

ve a

role

to p

lay

in R

MA

regu

lato

ry fr

amew

ork,

th

at ro

le s

houl

d no

t inc

lude

the

use

and

relia

nce

of a

bsol

ute

num

bers

tha

t ne

ed t

o be

com

plie

d w

ith.

Dele

te S

ched

ule

29 in

its e

ntire

ty.

Page 137: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A53

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

- O

vers

eer

is co

ntin

ually

upd

ated

and

thi

s m

eans

th

at n

itrog

en l

oss

num

bers

for

a f

arm

sys

tem

, ev

en w

here

it d

oes n

ot ch

ange

, will

chan

ge.

-

The

nitr

ogen

loss

rat

es in

clude

d in

this

sche

dule

ar

e ve

ry lo

w, e

ven

for s

heep

and

bee

f far

ms.

61

Sche

dule

30

– La

ndow

ner

Colle

ctiv

e, In

dust

ry

Prog

ram

me

and

Farm

Env

ironm

ent

Plan

103-

108

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

As o

utlin

ed a

bove

, in

rel

atio

n to

a n

umbe

r PP

C9

polic

ies

and

the

‘use

of

prod

uctio

n la

nd’

rule

s, Ra

vens

dow

n su

ppor

ts

the

use

of

Indu

stry

Pr

ogra

mm

es,

Catc

hmen

t Co

llect

ives

and

FEP

s fo

r fa

rmin

g ac

tiviti

es i

n th

e TA

NK c

atch

men

ts.

The

sc

hedu

le o

utlin

es t

he r

equi

rem

ents

for

thes

e pl

ans,

and

inclu

des,

but

is no

t lim

ited

to:

iden

tifyi

ng

prac

tices

, and

ass

ocia

ted

timef

ram

es, t

o co

ntrib

ute

to m

eetin

g fr

eshw

ater

qua

lity

obje

ctiv

es; a

dopt

ion

of

good

(m

anag

emen

t) pr

actic

es;

and,

ens

urin

g th

at

plan

s are

app

rove

d an

d au

dite

d.

Havi

ng

revi

ewed

th

e pr

opos

ed

sche

dule

, Ra

vens

dow

n co

nsid

ers

that

the

requ

irem

ents

of t

he

sche

dule

gen

eral

ly r

efle

ct s

imila

r ap

proa

ches

tha

t ha

ve b

een,

or

are

bein

g, a

dopt

ed t

hrou

ghou

t Ne

w

Zeal

and

in

regi

onal

pl

an

prov

ision

s fo

r fa

rmin

g ac

tiviti

es.

For t

his r

easo

n, th

is sc

hedu

le is

supp

orte

d.

As o

utlin

ed a

bove

in re

latio

n to

OBJ

TAN

K 1

(Sub

. Ref

. 1)

, in

sup

port

ing

the

cont

inue

d us

e of

the

FEP

th

roug

hout

PPC

9, R

aven

sdow

n ac

know

ledg

es t

hat

Part

9A

of t

he R

MAA

, and

the

reg

ulat

ion

that

is t

o fo

llow

from

thes

e pr

ovisi

ons

of th

e RM

AA, u

ses

the

term

FFP

. A

cha

nge

to t

his

term

inol

ogy,

and

the

re

quire

men

ts f

or F

EPs

unde

r th

is sc

hedu

le,

is no

t be

ing

requ

este

d by

Rav

ensd

own

as F

EPs

are

a to

ol

curr

ently

use

d na

tiona

lly, a

nd in

the

abse

nce

of th

e FF

P re

gula

tions

, it

is co

nsid

ered

pos

sible

tha

t a

FFP

Reta

in

Sche

dule

30

as

no

tifie

d,

but

mak

e am

endm

ents

thro

ugho

ut th

e sc

hedu

le to

ens

ure

that

co

nsist

ent

term

inol

ogy,

as

used

in

PPC9

, is

bein

g us

ed.

Page 138: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A54

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

coul

d fo

rm p

art o

f a b

road

er F

EP (i

.e.,

sect

ion

217F

of

the

RMAA

ide

ntifi

es t

he c

onte

nt r

equi

rem

ents

for

FF

P).

Whi

le s

uppo

rtin

g th

is sc

hedu

le,

Rave

nsdo

wn

note

s th

at P

PC9

term

inol

ogy h

as n

ot b

een

used

cons

isten

tly

thro

ugho

ut t

he s

ched

ule.

It

is co

nsid

ered

tha

t th

is sh

ould

be

rect

ified

.

62

Sche

dule

31

– Fl

ows,

Leve

ls an

d Al

loca

tion

Limits

109

Supp

ort

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s in

tere

st in

this

sche

dule

is a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith th

e fa

ct th

at it

s Nap

ier W

orks

take

s gro

undw

ater

fro

m th

e HP

GMU.

Th

is sc

hedu

le i

dent

ifies

the

min

imum

flo

ws,

flow

m

aint

enan

ce tr

igge

r and

allo

catio

n lim

it fo

r the

TAN

K ca

tchm

ent w

ater

man

agem

ent u

nits

.

The

allo

catio

n lim

it fo

r the

HPG

MU,

as

stat

ed in

this

sche

dule

, re

flect

s th

e to

tal

amou

nt a

lloca

ted

to

exist

ing

cons

ents

(pr

ior

to 2

May

202

0 w

hen

PPC9

w

as n

otifi

ed).

As a

hol

der o

f exi

stin

g w

ater

per

mits

to

take

gro

undw

ater

, Ra

vens

dow

n su

ppor

ts t

hat

the

fact

tha

t its

gro

undw

ater

tak

es, i

nto

the

futu

re, a

re

prov

ided

for w

ithin

the

allo

catio

n lim

it. R

aven

sdow

n al

so a

ckno

wle

dges

tha

t, as

a r

espo

nsib

le r

esou

rce

user

, tha

t w

hen

seek

ing

new

res

ourc

e co

nsen

ts f

or

thes

e gr

ound

wat

er t

akes

tha

t it

will

be

requ

ired

to

seek

an

allo

catio

n of

wat

er t

hat

refle

cts

the

site’

s ac

tual

and

reas

onab

le a

ntici

pate

d fu

ture

use

.

Reta

in S

ched

ule

31 a

s not

ified

.

63

Sche

dule

33

– W

ater

Per

mit

Expi

ry D

ates

112

Opp

ose

For t

he re

ason

s out

lined

abo

ve in

rela

tion

to P

olicy

49

(refe

r to

Sub.

Ref

. 45

abov

e), R

aven

sdow

n co

nsid

ers

that

fle

xibi

lity

shou

ld

be

prov

ided

w

ithin

PP

C9

whe

reby

a r

evie

w c

ondi

tion,

tha

t al

igns

with

the

co

mm

on e

xpiry

dat

es, i

s also

an

optio

n.

In a

dditi

on, i

t is

note

d th

at P

olicy

49

of P

PC9,

not

Amen

d Sc

hedu

le 3

3 as

follo

ws:

Re

fer t

o Po

licy

45 4

9 an

d Ru

les

TANK

9 -

11.

The

Coun

cil w

ill co

nsid

er th

e fo

llow

ing

Sche

dule

whe

n de

term

inin

g th

e du

ratio

n of

any

per

mit,

or

the

incl

usio

n of

a re

view

cond

ition

refle

ctin

g th

e sa

me

timef

ram

e, to

take

and

use

wat

er.

Page 139: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A55

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

Polic

y 45

, as

curr

ently

ref

erre

d to

in t

he s

ched

ule,

re

late

s to

wat

er p

erm

it ex

piry

dat

es.

Whe

re a

ppro

pria

te, t

he d

urat

ion

of t

he c

onse

nt

and/

or t

he r

evie

w c

ondi

tion

will

be

cons

isten

t w

ith th

e ne

xt co

mm

on e

xpiry

dat

e fo

r the

rele

vant

w

ater

man

agem

ent a

s sh

own

in th

is Sc

hedu

le. I

f an

app

licat

ion

is m

ade

up t

o th

ree

year

s be

fore

th

e ne

xt d

ue d

ate

for

the

rele

vant

zon

e, t

he

Coun

cil m

ay i

ssue

the

per

mit

for

the

follo

win

g ex

piry

da

te

or

inclu

de

a re

view

co

nditi

on

refle

ctin

g th

e sa

me

timef

ram

e.

For

appl

icatio

ns in

an

area

for

whi

ch n

o ex

piry

da

te is

spe

cifie

d, th

e du

ratio

n of

the

cons

ent w

ill

be a

mat

ter f

or C

ounc

il's d

iscre

tion.

64

Sche

dule

34

– Ur

ban

Site

Spe

cific

Si

te S

torm

wat

er

Man

agem

ent P

lan

113

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

Rave

nsdo

wn

supp

orts

th

e us

e of

st

orm

wat

er

man

agem

ent p

lans

, as

outli

ned

in R

ules

TAN

K 21

to

TANK

23,

inclu

ding

the

requ

irem

ent f

or in

dust

rial a

nd

trad

e pr

emise

s, su

ch a

s Rav

ensd

own’

s Nap

ier W

orks

, to

pre

pare

and

impl

emen

t suc

h pl

ans.

It is

cons

ider

ed

that

the

min

imum

req

uire

men

ts fo

r th

ese

plan

s, as

ou

tline

d in

the

sche

dule

, are

app

ropr

iate

. W

hile

sup

port

ing

the

requ

irem

ent f

or th

ese

plan

s, it

is co

nsid

ered

that

the

refe

renc

e to

‘urb

an’ s

houl

d be

re

mov

ed f

rom

the

sto

rmw

ater

pla

n na

me.

Th

is is

prin

cipal

ly a

s the

requ

irem

ent t

o pr

epar

e su

ch p

lans

, un

der

the

PPC9

sto

rmw

ater

rul

es,

does

not

sol

ely

appl

y to

urb

an e

nviro

nmen

ts.

For

exa

mpl

e, R

ule

TANK

22

appl

ies t

o di

scha

rges

from

indu

stria

l or t

rade

pr

emise

s, su

bjec

t to

a

num

ber

of

cond

ition

s, in

cludi

ng t

hat

a re

ticul

ated

sto

rmw

ater

net

wor

k is

not

avai

labl

e at

the

pro

pert

y bo

unda

ry.

This

infe

rs

that

pre

mise

s th

at a

re s

eeki

ng r

esou

rce

cons

ents

un

der t

his r

ule,

are

out

side

of u

rban

env

ironm

ents

. It

is no

ted

that

Con

ditio

n (a

) of R

ule

TANK

22

requ

ires a

Amen

d Sc

hedu

le 3

4 by

am

endi

ng r

efer

ence

s to

all

‘Urb

an Si

te Sp

ecifi

c Sto

rmw

ater

Man

agem

ent P

lan’

as

follo

ws:

Ur

ban

Site

Spec

ific S

torm

wat

er M

anag

emen

t Pla

n

Page 140: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A56

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

plan

, in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith th

is sc

hedu

le, t

o be

inclu

ded

as p

art o

f the

reso

urce

cons

ent a

pplic

atio

n.

65

Sche

dule

35

– So

urce

Pro

tect

ion

for D

rinki

ng W

ater

Su

pplie

s

119-

121

Supp

ort i

n pa

rt

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s Na

pier

W

orks

is

loca

ted

in

the

prop

osed

Aw

otot

o W

ater

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

ne

(Map

2 –

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

nes,

whi

ch i

s no

t a

plan

ning

map

s).

As

out

lined

abo

ve in

rela

tion

OBJ

TAN

K 9

and

Polic

y 6

(Sub

. Ref

s. 6

and

19)

, Rav

ensd

own

cons

ider

s tha

t it i

s im

port

ant

that

the

ext

ent

of t

he S

ourc

e Pr

otec

tion

Zone

refle

cts t

he a

rea

requ

ired

to p

rote

ct th

e Na

pier

dr

inki

ng w

ater

supp

ly.

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s tha

t if

the

exte

nt o

f the

zone

is la

rger

than

wha

t is r

equi

red

to a

chie

ve th

e pu

rpos

e of

the

zone

, the

n a

rang

e of

ac

tiviti

es

of

appr

opria

tely

lo

cate

d ac

tiviti

es

(i.e.

, ac

tiviti

es i

n In

dust

rial

Zone

s),

inclu

ding

the

Nap

ier

Wor

ks,

may

be

unne

cess

arily

con

stra

ined

by

the

pres

ence

of t

he S

ourc

e Pr

otec

tion

Zone

.

Give

n th

e ab

ove

pote

ntia

l iss

ue, i

t is

note

d th

at th

e se

ctio

n 32

Rep

ort

(p.2

52 o

f th

e se

ctio

n 32

Rep

ort)

stat

es th

at th

e So

urce

Pro

tect

ion

Zone

s fo

r Na

pier

’s w

ater

sup

ply

is pr

ovisi

onal

, and

tha

t th

e m

odel

ling

wor

k to

app

ropr

iate

ly d

efin

e th

e ex

tent

of t

he z

one

may

be

com

plet

ed i

n tim

e to

ena

ble

a te

chni

cal

subm

issio

n on

PC9

. If

this

is no

t th

e ca

se, t

hen

the

sect

ion

32 R

epor

t also

iden

tifie

s tha

t the

ext

ent o

f the

So

urce

Pro

tect

ion

Zone

s w

ill b

e re

fined

as

new

in

form

atio

n co

mes

to

ha

nd,

as

antic

ipat

ed

and

prov

ided

for b

y th

is sc

hedu

le (p

.253

of t

he se

ctio

n 32

Re

port

). G

iven

the

se is

sues

, Rav

ensd

own

requ

ests

th

at th

e ex

tent

of t

he zo

ne is

app

ropr

iate

ly id

entif

ied

on t

he m

aps,

even

tho

ugh

they

are

not

pla

nnin

g m

aps,

base

d on

rele

vant

tech

nica

l inf

orm

atio

n an

d in

Reta

in

Sche

dule

35

as

no

tifie

d,

inclu

ding

th

e re

fere

nce

to t

he “

Regi

ster

ed D

rinki

ng W

ater

Sup

ply

Prot

ectio

n Zo

ne m

ap la

yers

on

the

HBRC

web

site”

, An

d, a

men

d th

is ‘m

ap l

ayer

’ re

fere

nce,

and

all

asso

ciate

d re

fere

nces

, by

cle

arly

sta

ting

that

the

m

aps a

re ‘n

ot p

lann

ing

map

s’.

Page 141: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A57

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

acco

rdan

ce w

ith th

e ob

ject

ive

and

polic

ies o

f PPC

9.

Chap

ter 9

– G

loss

ary

of T

erm

s Use

d

66

Farm

Env

ironm

ent

Plan

12

6 Su

ppor

t PP

C9 d

efin

es F

EP a

s:

mea

ns

a pl

an

that

ha

s be

en

prep

ared

in

ac

cord

ance

with

the

req

uire

men

ts o

f Sc

hedu

le

30C

by

a pe

rson

w

ith

the

prof

essio

nal

qual

ifica

tions

nec

essa

ry t

o pr

epar

e su

ch a

pla

n w

hich

is im

plem

ente

d by

a la

ndow

ner o

r on

beha

lf of

a la

ndow

ner

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s tha

t FEP

s sho

uld

be p

repa

red

by

a pe

rson

w

ith

appr

opria

te

prof

essio

nal

qual

ifica

tions

. I

t is

also

im

port

ant

that

FEP

s ar

e im

plem

ente

d in

ord

er to

ach

ieve

the

outc

omes

bei

ng

soug

ht b

y PP

C9.

In su

ppor

ting

this

defin

ition

, Rav

ensd

own

reco

gnise

s th

at w

ith t

he i

ntro

duct

ion

of t

he F

FP r

egul

atio

ns

som

etim

e in

the

next

12-

mon

ths o

r so,

this

defin

ition

, an

d Sc

hedu

le 3

0C o

f PPC

may

nee

d to

be

revi

sited

.

Reta

in t

he d

efin

ition

of

‘Far

m E

nviro

nmen

t Pl

an’ a

s no

tifie

d.

Oth

er T

ANK

Map

s – S

ourc

e Pr

otec

tion

Zone

s (No

t Pla

nnin

g M

aps)

67

Map

2 –

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

ne

- O

ppos

e

Rave

nsdo

wn’

s Na

pier

W

orks

is

loca

ted

in

the

prop

osed

Aw

otot

o W

ater

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

ne

(Map

2 –

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

nes)

. Th

eref

ore,

whi

le

the

prop

osed

map

is n

ot a

pla

nnin

g m

ap, t

he m

ap is

co

nsid

ered

to

ha

ve

pote

ntia

l im

plica

tions

fo

r Ra

vens

dow

n’s

Napi

er W

orks

giv

en t

he o

bjec

tives

, po

licie

s and

rule

s con

tain

ed in

PPC

9 th

at re

fer t

o th

e So

urce

Pro

tect

ion

Zone

s (i.

e., t

he m

ap id

entif

ies

the

curr

ent

prop

osed

ex

tent

of

th

e dr

inki

ng

wat

er

Amen

d M

ap 2

to

refle

ct t

he e

xten

t of

the

Aw

otot

o W

ater

Sou

rce

Prot

ectio

n Zo

ne r

equi

red

to m

anag

e th

e po

tent

ial

risks

to

the

Napi

er d

rinki

ng w

ater

su

pply

.

Page 142: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Atta

chm

ent A

- Su

bmiss

ions

on

Prop

osed

Pla

n Ch

ange

9 (T

ANK

Catc

hmen

ts) t

o th

e

Haw

ke’s

Bay

Regi

onal

Res

ourc

e M

anag

emen

t Pla

n Ra

vens

dow

n Lim

ited

(14

Augu

st 2

020)

A58

SUB.

RE

F.

HBRR

P PP

C9

PRO

VISI

ON

PA

GE

SUPP

ORT

/

OPP

OSE

CO

MM

ENTS

RE

LIEF

SO

UGHT

prot

ectio

n zo

ne a

s des

crib

ed in

Sche

dule

35

– re

fer t

o Su

b. R

ef. 6

5 ab

ove)

. As

out

lined

abo

ve in

rela

tion

OBJ

TAN

K 9

and

Polic

y 6

(Sub

. Ref

s. 6

and

19)

, Rav

ensd

own

cons

ider

s tha

t it i

s im

port

ant

that

the

ext

ent

of t

he S

ourc

e Pr

otec

tion

Zone

refle

cts t

he a

rea

requ

ired

to p

rote

ct th

e Na

pier

dr

inki

ng w

ater

supp

ly.

Rave

nsdo

wn

cons

ider

s tha

t if

the

exte

nt o

f the

zone

is la

rger

than

wha

t is r

equi

red

to a

chie

ve th

e pu

rpos

e of

the

zon

e, th

en a

rang

e of

ac

tiviti

es

of

appr

opria

tely

lo

cate

d ac

tiviti

es

(i.e.

, ac

tiviti

es i

n In

dust

rial

Zone

s),

inclu

ding

the

Nap

ier

Wor

ks,

may

be

unne

cess

arily

con

stra

ined

by

the

pres

ence

of t

he S

ourc

e Pr

otec

tion

Zone

.

Give

n th

e ab

ove

pote

ntia

l iss

ue, i

t is

note

d th

at th

e se

ctio

n 32

Rep

ort

(p.2

52 o

f th

e se

ctio

n 32

Rep

ort)

stat

es th

at th

e So

urce

Pro

tect

ion

Zone

s fo

r Na

pier

’s w

ater

sup

ply

is pr

ovisi

onal

, and

tha

t th

e m

odel

ling

wor

k to

app

ropr

iate

ly d

efin

e th

e ex

tent

of t

he z

one

may

be

com

plet

ed i

n tim

e to

ena

ble

a te

chni

cal

subm

issio

n on

PC9

. If

this

is no

t th

e ca

se, t

hen

the

sect

ion

32 R

epor

t also

iden

tifie

s tha

t the

ext

ent o

f the

So

urce

Pro

tect

ion

Zone

s w

ill b

e re

fined

as

new

in

form

atio

n co

mes

to

ha

nd,

as

antic

ipat

ed

and

prov

ided

for

by

Sche

dule

35

(Sub

. Re

f. 65

abo

ve)

(p.2

53 o

f the

sect

ion

32 R

epor

t). G

iven

thes

e iss

ues,

Rave

nsdo

wn

requ

ests

that

the

exte

nt o

f the

zon

e is

appr

opria

tely

iden

tifie

d on

the

map

s, e

ven

thou

gh

they

are

not

pla

nnin

g m

aps,

bas

ed o

n re

leva

nt

tech

nica

l in

form

atio

n an

d in

acc

orda

nce

with

the

ob

ject

ive

and

polic

ies o

f PPC

9.

Page 143: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 144: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 145: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 146: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

HBRC Plan Change9 1 Ngatai Huata -Pa Waipatu Marae All Rights Reserved 14th August 2020

Submission on Proposed Plan Change 9 - TANK plan

To the Hawke's Bay Regional Resource Management Plan

Present to Clause 6 of the First Schedule, Resource Management Act 1991

To:

Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Private Bag 6006 NAPIER

Email:

[email protected]

Name of submitter:

Ngatai Huata

Tribal identity:

Ko Pa Waipatu Te Marae

Ko Heretaunga Te Whare Tipuna

Ko Hato Matiu Te Whare Karakia

Ko Kahuranaki Te Maunga

Ko Tūtaekuri, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro, Karamū Ngā Awa

Ko Ngāti Hori, Ngāti Hawea, Ngāti Hinemoa ngā Hapū

Ko Te Karanemanema o Te Mata o Rongokao Te Pou-Tiaki

Ko Ngāti Kahungunu Te Iwi

Ko Takitimu Te Waka

Ko Tamatea Arikinui Te Tangata.

Page 147: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

HBRC Plan Change9 2 Ngatai Huata -Pa Waipatu Marae All Rights Reserved 14th August 2020

Address

805 Norton Road,

Akina 4122, Hastings

Te Matau-ā-Maui (Hawke’s Bay)

Aotearoa – NZ

Ngatai Huata

E: [email protected]

Mobile:

(022)6014959

My Submission on Proposed Plan Change 9 - TANK

To the Hawke's Bay Regional Resource Management Plan

Present to Clause 6 of the First Schedule, Resource Management Act 1991

To:

Hawke's Bay Regional Council

Private Bag 6006 NAPIER

Email:

[email protected]

Name of submitter:

Ngatai Huata

Tribal identity:

Ko Pa Waipatu Te Marae

Ko Heretaunga Te Whare Tipuna

Ko Hato Matiu Te Whare Karakia

Ko Kahuranaki Te Maunga

Ko Tūtaekuri, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro, Karamū Ngā Awa

Ko Ngāti Hori, Ngāti Hawea, Ngāti Hinemoa ngā Hapu

Ko Ngāti Kahungunu Te Iwi

Ko Takitimu Te Waka

Ko Tamatea Arikinui Te Tangata.

Page 148: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

HBRC Plan Change9 3 Ngatai Huata -Pa Waipatu Marae All Rights Reserved 14th August 2020

Address

805 Norton Road,

Akina 4122, Hastings

Te Matau-ā-Maui (Hawke’s Bay)

Aotearoa – NZ

Ngatai Huata

E: [email protected]

Mobile:

(022) 6014959

He Kupu Whakataki: This submission lays out my views of the HBRC proposed TANK Plan

Change 9, and provisos of the proposed plan.

This I will lay out primarily through sharing the Teachings and Learnings of my Tipuna and

ensuing Life’s experiences, and continuing Lifetime Rangahau and Wānanga of …

WAI, WAI-U, WAIRUA, WAIORA, WAITAPU, WAIPUNA, WAIRERE, WAI TAHEKE, TŪMOMO

WAI me ēra atu māuri o ngā mea o Te Hau Oranga o Te Ao Turoa

He Kaupapa Kupu Kōrero Oranga Wairua:

All Our Relations: Awa, Wai-u, Wairere, Wai moana, Muriwaihou

Our Rivers, Our Lakes, Our Streams, Our Moana, Our Mountains,

We Are Our Rivers - Our Rivers are Us

Tūtaekuri, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro, Karamū

The Aquifer

Water Life

Water Spirit

Water Soul

He Kaupapa Pūtake Kupu Kōrero Oranga Māuri:

My submission further opposes the provisos in Plan Change 9 relating to these

following kaupapa pūtake …

Water Quality, Water Quantity, Water Usage, Water Pollution, Water Discharge

Page 149: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

HBRC Plan Change9 4 Ngatai Huata -Pa Waipatu Marae All Rights Reserved 14th August 2020

He Kupu Whakakapi:

Summary of the evidence submitted, and proposed resolutions of that summary segues

across from other submissions:

Pa Waipatu Marae

Te Manaaki Taiao

Te Rūnanganui o Heretaunga

Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga

Ngāti Kahungunu Iwi Inc.

I am Ngāti Kahungunu, I am Takitimu

I am Te Mana Ahua Ake o Te Tiriti o Waitangi

I am He Mana Ahua Ake Wakaputanga o Te Rangatiratanga o Niu Tireni

There is no equity or ownership in decisions regarding ahau, mātou, tātou

Ko Ahau Ngā Awa … Ko Ngā Awa Ko Ahau

I will present my submission at the Pa Waipatu Marae Hearings, and please supply a

translator for your own purpose.

Signature:

Date: 14th August 2020

Page 150: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Submission on Proposed Plan Change 9: Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan

PLEASE NOTE: your submission will become part of a public record of Council documents. This will mean your name, address and contact details will be searchable by other persons.

Name: NGATAI HUATA (required)

Organisation/Iwi/Hapu:

PA WAIPATU MARAE

NGĀTI HAWEA, NGĀTI HORI, NGĀTI HINEMOA

TE RŪNANGANUI O HERETAUNGA O TE TAIWHENUA O HERETAUNGA

NGĀTI KAHUNGUNU IWI INC

Postal address: (required)

PA MAI ON NORTON, 805 NORTON ROAD, AKINA 4122, HASTINGS,

TE MATAU-Ā-MĀUI (HAWKE’S BAY), AOTEAROA - NZ

YES I wish to present my submission within a joint case with the Pa

Waipatu Marae submission and other members of Waipatu at the

Hearings

Email address: [email protected]; [email protected]

Phone number (022) 6014959

Contact person and address if different to above: NGATAI HUATA (as above)

Trade Competition Pursuant to Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991, a person who could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission may make a submission only if directly affected by an effect of the proposed policy statement or plan that:

a) adversely affects the environment; and

b) does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade

competition.

Please tick the sentence that applies to you:

I could not gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission; or

I could gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission.

If you have ticked this box please select one of the following:

If others make a similar submission, would you consider

presenting a joint case with them at a hearing? Yes / No

Page 151: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

I am directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission

I am not directly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission.

Do you wish to be heard in support of your submission? Yes / No

Signature: Date: 14th August 2020

NB: Space for writing submissions is overleaf.

Submission Details Please attach more pages if necessary. If you do not wish to use this form, please ensure that the same information required by this form is covered in your submission. Further information on how to make a submission and the submission process is available on the Regional Council website.

Plan provision (eg. objective, policy or rule number) .....................................................................................................................................................................................................

OPPOSE Amend

I seek the following decision from the Regional Council: [Please give precise details to ensure your views are accurately represented in submission summary documents to be prepared by the council as part of the submission and hearing process]

PLEASE REFER TO ATTACHMENT:

Ngatai Huata Pa Waipatu Marae HBRC Plan Change 9 SUBMISSION Reason for decision requested:

REMINDER: SUBMISSIONS MUST REACH COUNCIL BY 5PM ON 3 JULY 2020

Page 152: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

He Moemoea Ngātai Huata

HBRC Plan Change 9 1 Ngatai Huata Pa Waipatu All Rights Reserved©©℗™ 14th August 2020

PA WAIPATU MARAE HBRC Plan Change 9

Nā Ngātai Huata te waiata kaupapa pūtake o Ngā Wai o Waiora Wairua Wairere o Waipatu

Hei Whakaoranga Here-Turi-Kōkā 2020

Pa Waipatu, Whakakite, Moemoeā Rārangahia, He Whāriki, Mō Ngā Tau Kotahi Mano E Heke Mai Nei, Mō Ngā Uri Tamariki Mokopuna, Rangatira, Ngāi Tamariki , Mokopuna, Uri Rangatira, Ngā Wāhine Pūrotu, o Waipatu Ka karanga ake ki ngā wahine, E Ngā Whare Tāngata Ka puta noa i Tēnei Ao Hurihuri e Ngā Tamariki, Mokopuna, Waihua Mō Ngā Uri, Mokopuna, Hei Oranga Te Matapuna, Te Puna, Hei Oranga Nana i Tango Nana i Tuku Ko Io Mata Ngaro E Heke Mai Nei, Mō Ngā Uri Tamariki, Rangatira, Moemoeā Te Matapuna, He Waiora He Wairua Mai i te Puna, hei Oranga, he Moemoeā Ka Pupu ake, Te Puna, o Te Mātauranga E Pōkarekare ana, Ngā Wai o Wairua, Waipuna (Waiata) E rere ana, hei Tōmairangi, Te Waiora

Page 153: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

He Moemoea Ngātai Huata

HBRC Plan Change 9 2 Ngatai Huata Pa Waipatu All Rights Reserved©©℗™ 14th August 2020

Ma Te Whānau … Me Ngā Hapū … Pa Waipatu, Rārangahia, Whāriki Oranga, Mō Ngā Tau Kotahi Mano Ngā Kai-Tiaki, Ngā Wai o Waiora, Pa Waipatu e … Whakaoranga Tūtaekuri, Ahuriri … Ngaruroro … Karamū e … Nā te Puna o Waikoko, Te Waiora Te Muriwaihou Te Tumu Oranga Te Whānau Hapū o Waipatu, E Pōkarekare ana, Ngā Wai o Waiora, Waiata, Aroha O Ngāti Hori, o Ngāti Hāwea, o Ngāti Hinemoa, E Karanga ake, a mātou hapū - Māuri Ora – Hei Oranga Ka Karanga Mana Ahua Ake - Tū Mai Ra … Pa Waipatu

Page 154: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 155: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 156: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 157: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 158: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 159: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 160: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 161: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Phone number: 068796383

Proposed TANK Plan Change 9

Submitter DetailsFirst name: charmaine Last name: Pene

I could notGain an advantage in trade competition through this submission

I am notdirectly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that : a. adversely affects the environment, andb. does not relate to the trade competition or the effects of trade competitions.Note to person making submission:If you are a person who could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may belimited by clause 6(4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991

Would you like to present your submission in person at a hearing? Yes

I do NOT wish to speak in support of my submission and ask that the following submission be fully considered.

Additional requirements for hearing:

Consultation Document Submissions

Proposed TANK Plan Change 9SupportOpposeAmend

I seek the following decision from the Regional Council:

In general, this submission opposes the 'Proposed Plan Change 9'.

The following issues of concern are:

1. Lack of consultation with tangata whenua along the Ngaruroro river; and also with tangata whenua at Papanui StreamPatangata.

P1 Background gives a sense that robust consultation with tangata whenua was conducted. This is not the case.

2. Restrictions on Land use and water activities:

2.1 Gravel extractions- Who do they service?

This activity impacts on the freshwater fish or resources.

Page 162: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

There are several sites along the Ngaruroro River.

There are two National Standards in regards to this type of activity.

2.2 Speed boating activities on the river or lakes.

This type of activity not only disrupts the ecosystem, and the fresh water fish but also pollutes or carries foreign matterfrom other areas. Good example of this is the Rotorua and Taupo Lakes.

3. The taking of water from the Ngaruroro River.

Water levels in the Ngaruroro River was an all time low. Below Zero. HBRC failed to act before it reached this level.

I highly recommend that the resource consent application for the man-made lake in Maraekakaho and the one betweenMatapiro and Whanawhana be reviewed.

4. Resource Consent applications for lifestyle Blocks be restricted.

Reason for decision requested:I would like to speak further to these points and attempt to offer some resolutions for consideration.

Attached Documents

File

No records to display.

Page 163: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Phone number: 0272414758 (Tania)

Proposed TANK Plan Change 9

Submitter Details

Submission Date: 14/08/2020First name: Andrew and Tania Last name: Kerr

I could notGain an advantage in trade competition through this submission

I am notdirectly affected by an effect of the subject matter of the submission that : a. adversely affects the environment, and b. does not relate to the trade competition or the effects of trade competitions.Note to person making submission:If you are a person who could gain an advantage in trade competition through the submission, your right to make a submission may belimited by clause 6(4) of Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991

Would you like to present your submission in person at a hearing? Yes

I do NOT wish to speak in support of my submission and ask that the following submission be fully considered.

Additional requirements for hearing:

Consultation Document Submissions

Proposed TANK Plan Change 9SupportOpposeAmend

I seek the following decision from the Regional Council:

1. support for Catchment groups, to set up and to operate, and to encourage the, to come together to shareideas and works closely with HBRC

2. support the effective operation of catchment groups to ensure they operate to their full potential

3. delete rule regarding 10% land use change as a trigger for consent

4. Maintain current 20m3 allowance for new water takes

5. Stock exclusion rules should match the new national standards.

Page 164: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Reason for decision requested:

1. catchment groups can spend a lot off time and energy during the setup process. We believe this could bestreamlined with HBRC assistance.

2. For Catchments groups to reach potential they will need guidance and science. HBRC can assist with fundingtowards appropriate science to ensure data collected is relevant and of use to drive change ( if needed)

3. Farms need to be able to quickly alter land use to respond to market and climate. (think 2020 drought) A 10%land use change rule, (if used to trigger a resource consent application) becomes a costly and limiting factorwith little benefit

4. To limit a take to 5m3/day is unworkable for the average farmer, especially as in many cases the current 20 m3 /day limit is insufficient. A basicoperation carrying 200 cattle through summer would consume approximately 5-6 m3 on their own without accounting for other livestock classes (e.g.sheep) or domestic use. This issue is particularly relevant as more farms move to exclude stock from water courses

5. National standards (although not perfect ) have clearly identified land parcels with rules where stock mustexcluded from waterways. This is easier to understand and comply with, than calculating a 15% slope onaverage in a paddock

Attached Documents

File

Proposed TANK Plan Change 9

Page 165: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 166: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 167: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 168: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 169: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 170: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 171: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 172: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 173: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 174: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 175: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 176: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 177: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 178: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 179: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 180: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 181: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 182: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Submission on proposed Plan Change 9: Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan (HB RRMP)

Submitted by: Jamie Wheeler Date: 14 August 2020

No a whenua tawhiti oku tupuna, kua noho oku tangata ki Aotearoa, he pakeha matau. I noho au ki Papaioa, ka haere au ki Te Kura a Iwi o Ngati Kauwhata, Katahi ka noho au ki heretaunga inaianei, Ko Tracy Wheeler toku mama, Ko Bevin Wheeler toku papa, Ko Jamie ahau. I am a seventeen year old girl from Hastings. I want to have a say in what happens to the rivers that I love to swim in in summer. I’ve been learning about sustainability and kaitiakitanga. I want our Hawke’s Bay rivers to be sustainable for me and for future generations because I’m going to live here for the next sixty or seventy years.

I fully support Ngati Kahungunu Iwi Incorporated submission and the submissions from the people of Heretaunga marae and their recommendations to make the TANK plan a more sustainable way forward. I support them because they are the kaitiaki of this rohe, and they are the ones who have lived here the longest and deserve a significant say in what happens. They know what’s going on, and what’s working and not working. Please strongly consider what they have to say and modify the proposed Plan Change to include their recommendations. Their values, recommendations and view of things should be included because, as I said, they are the kaitiaki of this rohe. This means that they are the people who have a strong connection to the mauri of this land, and the rivers, and feel a cultural responsibility as tangata whenua, to look after this place. Ngati Kahungunu have mana and need to be heard.

Naku noa, Jamie Wheeler

Page 183: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 184: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 185: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 186: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 187: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 188: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

New Zealand Defence Force Defence Estate and Infrastructure

Level 6 Reserve Bank NZDF Headquarters

Private Bag 39997Wellington 6045

Submission on Proposed Plan Change 9 (TANK Plan Change) Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan

Clause 6 of First Schedule, Resource Management Act 1991

To: Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Address: 159 Dalton Street, Napier 4110

Private Bag 6006, Napier 4142 Email: [email protected] Submitter: New Zealand Defence Force Contact Person: Rebecca Davies, Senior Environmental Officer Address for Service: New Zealand Defence Force

C/- Tonkin + Taylor PO Box 2083 Wellington 6140 Attention: Sarah Bevin

Phone: +64 21 445 482 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Introduction The New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) welcomes the opportunity to submit on the proposed plan change to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Resource Management Plan for the Tūtaekurī, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro and Karamū (TANK) catchments (herein the ‘Proposed TANK Plan Change’). NZDF has outlined the key matters of importance to their operations and requested amendments to the provisions of the Proposed TANK Plan Change to facilitate this, as described below. NZDF has military interests throughout New Zealand. Within the Hawke’s Bay region, NZDF manages the closed Roy’s Hill Rifle Range facility and the operational Army Battalion HQ in Napier. NZDF may need larger or additional facilities in the Hawke’s Bay region in the future. NZDF may also undertake temporary military training activities (TMTA) in the Hawke’s Bay region. Temporary Military Training Activities NZDF is undertaking a nationwide project to ensure that regional and district plans recognise and provide for TMTAs. NZDF undertakes TMTAs across New Zealand as part of its function of maintaining the nation’s security, maintaining NZDF operational capacity and providing for the wellbeing, health and safety of communities. TMTA are essential in maintaining capability so that NZDF is ready to respond to a wide range of national and international situations, including providing aid and assistance following natural disasters. The need to train in unfamiliar real-world situations means that TMTA may be undertaken

Page 189: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

2

anywhere within a region and as such need to be provided for in regional plan provisions to address their effects. As the TANK Plan Change relates to water quality and quantity only, the TMTA activities of particular relevance are firefighting training and water treatment. Firefighting Training NZDF respond to a range of emergency fire incidents from aircraft, structural and rural rescue and firefighting operations. To maintain capability and skills, personnel must train using realistic scenarios which may be specific training exercises or undertaken as part of a larger scale military exercise to prevent, suppress and extinguish fires. While section 14(3)(e) of the RMA expressly provides for water take/use for firefighting purposes it is imperative that regional plans provide for these activities, or at least not contradict section 14(3)(e). Water Treatment Activities NZDF operates deployable (portable) water treatment units as part of its defence functions in situations such as civil defence emergencies. To maintain its capability in operating these units and meet its statutory obligations under the Defence Act 1990, personnel must train with the units under realistic field conditions. This training may be water treatment specific or may involve producing potable water for military personnel as part of a larger scale military exercise. In this submission, NZDF requests for specific permitted activity rules to be provided in proposed TANK Plan Change to enable these important training activities to take place. Further information on the operation of the portable water treatment units is provided in Attachment 1 (please note that the information is based on the current model of treatment units and may change in the next year or so). The submission by NZDF is provided in Table 1 attached – in the ‘relief sought’ column where text is sought to be deleted/removed, this is shown in strikethrough and where text is sought to be added, this is shown as underlined. NZDF could not gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission. NZDF wishes to be heard in support of this submission. If others make a similar submission, NZDF will consider presenting a joint case with them at the hearing.

Date14/08/2020 Person authorised to sign on behalf of New Zealand Defence Force

Page 190: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Poin

t Pr

ovis

ion

Supp

ort/

Opp

ose

Rea

sons

R

elie

f Sou

ght

Polic

ies

1 10

Su

ppor

t Th

is p

olic

y se

eks

to m

anag

e po

int s

ourc

e di

scha

rges

th

roug

h a

rang

e of

fact

ors

that

the

Cou

ncil

mus

t tak

e in

to a

ccou

nt w

hen

cons

ider

ing

appl

icat

ions

for c

onse

nt

incl

udin

g th

e de

gree

to w

hich

the

disc

harg

e is

of a

te

mpo

rary

nat

ure .

NZD

F su

ppor

ts th

e m

anag

emen

t of

poin

t sou

rce

disc

harg

es a

s so

ught

by

this

pol

icy.

Bot

h fir

efig

htin

g tra

inin

g an

d th

e us

e of

the

wat

er tr

eatm

ent

units

may

resu

lt in

poi

nt s

ourc

e di

scha

rges

whi

ch m

ay

or m

ay n

ot in

clud

e co

ntam

inan

ts (s

uch

as fi

re

supp

ress

ants

, chl

orin

e an

d cl

eani

ng s

olut

ions

etc

). H

owev

er, t

hese

act

iviti

es a

re o

f a te

mpo

rary

nat

ure

and

ther

efor

e ab

le to

be

man

aged

so

as to

avo

id lo

ng te

rm

effe

cts

on w

ater

qua

lity.

Fu

rther

info

rmat

ion

on th

e di

scha

rges

whi

ch m

ay b

e as

soci

ated

with

the

wat

er tr

eatm

ent u

nits

ope

rate

d by

N

ZDF

is a

ttach

ed a

t Atta

chm

ent 1

.

Ret

ain

as n

otifi

ed

2 51

Su

ppor

t Po

licy

51 s

ets

a pr

iorit

y or

der f

or w

ater

use

s w

hen

mak

ing

shor

tage

dire

ctio

ns u

nder

Sec

tion

329

of th

e R

MA.

The

pol

icy

excl

udes

fire

fight

ing

and

non -

cons

umpt

ive

uses

from

thes

e re

stric

tions

. As

men

tione

d in

the

intro

duct

ion

of th

e su

bmis

sion

, sec

tion

14(3

)(e) o

f the

RM

A ex

pres

sly

prov

ides

for w

ater

ta

ke/u

se fo

r fire

fight

ing

purp

oses

for N

ZDF.

Con

ditio

n (i)

of t

his

polic

y al

igns

with

the

RM

A an

d th

eref

ore,

N

ZDF

supp

orts

this

pol

icy.

Ret

ain

as n

otifi

ed

Rul

es

3 Se

ctio

n 6.

10.2

Wat

er

– Ta

ke a

nd

Use

Opp

ose

Sect

ion

6.10

.2 p

rovi

des

rule

s re

latin

g to

wat

er ta

ke a

nd

use.

Pro

pose

d R

ule

TAN

K 7

only

pro

vide

s fo

r wat

er

take

s fo

r up

to 5

m3

per d

ay (a

mon

g ot

her c

ondi

tions

) as

a p

erm

itted

act

ivity

. The

cur

rent

wat

er tr

eatm

ent

NZD

F se

eks

a ne

w p

erm

itted

act

ivity

rule

and

st

anda

rds

be in

serte

d to

pro

vide

for t

empo

rary

ta

ke, u

se a

nd d

isch

arge

of w

ater

for w

ater

tre

atm

ent u

nits

. Sug

gest

ed w

ordi

ng is

as

Page 191: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

4

Poin

t Pr

ovis

ion

Supp

ort/

Opp

ose

Rea

sons

R

elie

f Sou

ght

units

requ

ire te

mpo

rary

taki

ng a

nd u

se o

f sur

face

wat

er

of u

p to

210

m3/

day

(bas

ed o

n th

e cu

rrent

mod

el o

f tre

atm

ent u

nit –

this

may

cha

nge

in th

e ne

xt y

ear o

r so

) . G

iven

that

tem

pora

ry ta

kes

are

not p

rovi

ded

for w

ithin

th

e r ro

pose

d ru

les,

NZD

F re

ques

t the

incl

usio

n of

an

addi

tiona

l rul

e to

pro

vide

for t

hese

spe

cific

act

iviti

es.

Furth

er in

form

atio

n on

the

wat

er tr

eatm

ent u

nits

op

erat

ed b

y N

ZDF

is a

ttach

ed a

t Atta

chm

ent 1

.

follo

ws:

Th

e ta

ke, u

se a

nd d

isch

arge

to la

nd o

r sur

face

w

ater

for u

se o

f wat

er tr

eatm

ent u

nits

. a)

Th

e in

stan

tane

ous

take

rate

mus

t not

ex

ceed

5%

of t

he ri

ver f

low

at t

he p

oint

of

take

at a

ny ti

me.

b)

Th

e ta

ke, u

se a

nd d

isch

arge

mus

t be

cond

ucte

d by

the

New

Zea

land

Def

ence

Fo

rce.

c)

Th

e ta

ke m

ust n

ot o

ccur

for m

ore

than

te

n co

nsec

utiv

e da

ys.

4

Sect

ion

6.10

.2 W

ater

–

Take

and

U

se

Opp

ose

Prop

osed

Rul

es T

ANK

14-1

7 re

late

to d

amm

ing

activ

ities

how

ever

do

not p

rovi

de s

peci

fic p

rovi

sion

for

tem

pora

ry d

amm

ing

activ

ities

. As

part

of tr

aini

ng

activ

ities

, NZD

F m

ay n

eed

to c

onst

ruct

a te

mpo

rary

da

m to

ena

ble

the

use

of w

ater

trea

tmen

t uni

ts. N

ZDF

cons

ider

s it

appr

opria

te to

pro

vide

for t

empo

rary

dam

s to

be

cons

truct

ed w

ithin

wat

erco

urse

s as

a p

erm

itted

ac

tivity

(sub

ject

to c

ondi

tions

), ac

tivity

whi

le a

lso

reco

gnis

ing

that

it is

not

app

ropr

iate

for t

his

activ

ity to

oc

cur o

n th

e m

ain

stem

s of

the

follo

win

g riv

ers :

Nga

ruro

ro R

iver

Taru

arau

Riv

er

O

mah

aki R

iver

Tūta

ekur

ī Riv

er:

M

anga

one

Riv

er

M

anga

tutu

Riv

er

Inse

rt a

new

rule

to p

rovi

de fo

r tem

pora

ry d

ams

as a

per

mitt

ed a

ctiv

ity, s

ubje

ct to

sta

ndar

ds, a

s re

ques

ted

belo

w:

The

cons

truct

ion

of a

tem

pora

ry d

am a

nd

asso

ciat

ed ta

ke a

nd u

se o

f sur

face

wat

er fo

r us

e of

wat

er tr

eatm

ent u

nits

. a)

Th

e ac

tivity

mus

t be

unde

rtake

n by

the

New

Zea

land

Def

ence

For

ce;

b)

The

tem

pora

ry d

am m

ust n

ot in

ters

ect

grou

ndw

ater

; c)

Th

e te

mpo

rary

dam

mus

t not

be

built

w

ithin

500

m u

pstre

am o

f a d

wel

ling,

fo

rmed

pub

lic ro

ad o

r des

igna

ted

rail

infra

stru

ctur

e; a

nd

d)

The

dam

mus

t be

cons

truct

ed to

ena

ble

dism

antli

ng a

t the

com

plet

ion

of e

ach

use.

Page 192: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

5

Poin

t Pr

ovis

ion

Supp

ort/

Opp

ose

Rea

sons

R

elie

f Sou

ght

e)

The

dam

mus

t not

be

on th

e m

ains

tem

of

the

follo

win

g riv

ers:

(i)

N

garu

roro

Riv

er

(ii)

Taru

arau

Riv

er

(iii)

Om

ahak

i Riv

er

(iv) T

ūtae

kurī

Riv

er:

(v)

Man

gaon

e R

iver

(v

i) M

anga

tutu

Riv

er

Page 193: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Attachment 1: Details on the operation of portable water treatment units for military training

NZDF must train in the use of portable water treatment units in order to maintain its capability.

Operation of the treatment units involves the abstraction of surface water (marine or fresh), associated minor bed disturbance if required, and the discharge of process water and unused potable water back into the environment.

The following information provides an overview of the NZDF’s training activities using portable water treatment units, and further details can be provided on request.

Overview of the portable water treatments units A number of different types of water treatment units are currently used by NZDF. In general, the units operate as follows;

- Flexible intake pipe with screen is placed in the suitable water source; - Raw water is pumped to the unit; - Water is treated by filtration or reverse osmosis. No chemicals are used in the

treatment process, and chlorine is added only if the water is to be stored; - The water streams are discharged to land or water; - The units are periodically cleaned using air, water, and/or additives.

Abstraction rates Water is abstracted at a maximum rate of 16.67 litres/second to a maximum daily volume of 210m3/day.

Abstraction site selection Depending on the purpose of the training, water can be abstracted from lakes, permanently or intermittently flowing streams, estuaries, or the sea.

The units require a continuous water supply or they may be damaged. Abstraction sites are therefore only selected if the operator is certain that there is sufficient flow at many times greater that then pump rate. This limitation ensures that the abstraction does not result in severe reductions in water levels that might impact on aquatic habitat and organisms.

Depending on the site, minor disturbance of the bed might be required to hand dig a small pool to facilitate placement and operation of the pump inlet.

Training may occur on NZDF owned land or by arrangement on other public private land across the country.

Discharges The discharges from the water treatment units fall under there categories: potable water, concentrate and backwash, and cleaning solutions. The nature of these discharges types and their management procedures are summarised as follows:

Page 194: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

1 Potable water: chlorinated or unchlorinated clean water. Potable water that is not consumed is discharged either direct to the waterbody or over stable vegetated land. Chlorinated water is left as long as possible exposed to sunlight to encourage deactivation, and the rate of discharge is controlled to ensure the chlorine levels in the receiving water body meet the ANZECC Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality.

2 Concentrate and backwash: raw water with higher concentrations of original, source water, contaminants. Concentrate and backwash is discharged to a sump or to stable vegetated land; it is not discharged direct to the source waterbody.

3 Cleaning solutions; the units are periodically washed using cleaning solutions (normally acid based) then rinsed with water, and are disinfected using chlorine based disinfectants to prevent cross-contamination. These operations are generally undertaken at an NZDF camp or base and the cleaning solutions are discharged to the sewer. There cleaning must be undertaken in the field, the cleaning solutions are discharged to a hand dug sump or stable vegetated land in locations where it will not discharge to surface water, and diluted with rinse water.

Frequency and duration NZDF generally conducts between two and four water treatment training exercises per year nationwide. When in operation, the water treatment units may be in use 24 hours per day. Exercises will generally last for around 72 hours (3 days), but can last up to three weeks when supporting a larger military training exercise.

Page 195: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 196: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 197: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 198: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 199: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 200: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 201: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 202: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 203: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 204: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 205: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 206: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 207: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 208: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact
Page 209: PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 ......PART 4 – Submitters by number – Submitters 132 -150 INDEX PAGE NOTE: Where two people are listed under submitter/contact

Edición 132 GUANACASTE, COSTA RICA. VALOR: ¢150 …

Edición 132 GUANACASTE, COSTA RICA. VALOR: ¢150 …

Documents
220/132 kV, 150 & 100 MVA; 132/66 kV, 50 MVA AUTO TRANSFORMER

220/132 kV, 150 & 100 MVA; 132/66 kV, 50 MVA AUTO TRANSFORMER

Documents
User's Guide for Submitters - V1.1

User's Guide for Submitters - V1.1

Documents
UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID · ÍNDICE DE ARCADA-CARA 113 DISCUSIÓN 116 CONCLUSIONES 128 BIBLIOGRAFÍA 132 ORDEN DE APARICIÓN 132 ORDEN ALFABÉTICO 150 Iv. INTRODUCCIÓN 1

UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID · ÍNDICE DE ARCADA-CARA 113 DISCUSIÓN 116 CONCLUSIONES 128 BIBLIOGRAFÍA 132 ORDEN DE APARICIÓN 132 ORDEN ALFABÉTICO 150 Iv. INTRODUCCIÓN 1

Documents
220/132 kV, 150 & 100 MVA; 132/66 kV, 50 & 100 … Office...GETCO/E/TS – XMER 01/R8 Mar 16 Sign and Seal of Bidder Page 6 of 100 SECTION: I DETAIL SPECIFICATION OF 150/100 MVA, 220/132

220/132 kV, 150 & 100 MVA; 132/66 kV, 50 & 100 … Office...GETCO/E/TS – XMER 01/R8 Mar 16 Sign and Seal of Bidder Page 6 of 100 SECTION: I DETAIL SPECIFICATION OF 150/100 MVA, 220/132

Documents
Manufacturing Machinery Exchange #132 - North · PDF fileManufacturing Machinery Exchange #132 - North America OVER 150 LOTS of Metalworking & Machine Tool Assets ... • Okuma LB15

Manufacturing Machinery Exchange #132 - North · PDF fileManufacturing Machinery Exchange #132 - North America OVER 150 LOTS of Metalworking & Machine Tool Assets ... • Okuma LB15

Documents
€¦ · (5) 2003 1995 -d (3) (5) , , 2017 J.>K 1/274 193 ,1960 150 ,1960 1/132 1960 2/132 , 1960 191 ,2/19 19 J!

€¦ · (5) 2003 1995 -d (3) (5) , , 2017 J.>K 1/274 193 ,1960 150 ,1960 1/132 1960 2/132 , 1960 191 ,2/19 19 J!

Documents
ИНФОРМАЦИОНЕН БЮЛЕТИН - Troyan · 132. Да гледаш кино под звездите. … 150 вдъхновяващи причини за посещение

ИНФОРМАЦИОНЕН БЮЛЕТИН - Troyan · 132. Да гледаш кино под звездите. … 150 вдъхновяващи причини за посещение

Documents
Appendix B – Relevant Submitters - Waikato · 2019. 4. 15. · Doc # 14060932 Page 1 Appendix B – Relevant Submitters (See separate document – Section 42A report - PC1 Block

Appendix B – Relevant Submitters - Waikato · 2019. 4. 15. · Doc # 14060932 Page 1 Appendix B – Relevant Submitters (See separate document – Section 42A report - PC1 Block

Documents
Advocate Righteousness and Forbid Evil 20 th Annual Conference United Submitters International

Advocate Righteousness and Forbid Evil 20 th Annual Conference United Submitters International

Documents
Task Force Submitters LFG Analysis

Task Force Submitters LFG Analysis

Documents
Submitters: Erez Rokah Erez Goldshide Supervisor: Yossi Kanizo

Submitters: Erez Rokah Erez Goldshide Supervisor: Yossi Kanizo

Documents
our submitters! We produce resources, such as fact sheets

our submitters! We produce resources, such as fact sheets

Documents
ATA Tools CatalogueВысокоскоростные прямые шлифовальные машинки карандашного типа 132 bb 20 bb 150 bb 31 bb MX[fkg‘dfdghcd_

ATA Tools CatalogueВысокоскоростные прямые шлифовальные машинки карандашного типа 132 bb 20 bb 150 bb 31 bb MX[fkg‘dfdghcd_

Documents
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OF 132, 220 & 400 kV … Office/0... · TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OF 132, 220 & 400 kV CLASS ... 150% of rated current : ... 220 & 400 kV isolators & earthing

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OF 132, 220 & 400 kV … Office/0... · TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION OF 132, 220 & 400 kV CLASS ... 150% of rated current : ... 220 & 400 kV isolators & earthing

Documents
1GA.org | (602) 791-3989 | Monotheist Submitters according

1GA.org | (602) 791-3989 | Monotheist Submitters according

Documents
検討1...332 256 132 335 256 4 @ 906=3624 335 150 420 150 150 720 850 4550 850 720 150 332 256 332 70 310 70 70 310 70 332 256 332 150 920 450 4950 450 920 150 250 325 676 4 @ 906=3624

検討1...332 256 132 335 256 4 @ 906=3624 335 150 420 150 150 720 850 4550 850 720 150 332 256 332 70 310 70 70 310 70 332 256 332 150 920 450 4950 450 920 150 250 325 676 4 @ 906=3624

Documents
SUBMITTERS LIST IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER BY ......SUBMITTERS LIST IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER BY SURNAME (OR ORGANISATION NAME) 1 Submission Number First Name Surname / Organisation Representative

SUBMITTERS LIST IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER BY ......SUBMITTERS LIST IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER BY SURNAME (OR ORGANISATION NAME) 1 Submission Number First Name Surname / Organisation Representative

Documents
Online Grade Submission Application For Submitters and Enterers · 2011. 8. 8. · Online Gradesheet Submission Tool for Submitters and Enterers – Summer 2011 ... student registration

Online Grade Submission Application For Submitters and Enterers · 2011. 8. 8. · Online Gradesheet Submission Tool for Submitters and Enterers – Summer 2011 ... student registration

Documents
ArchiCAD - · PDF fileo1 120 150 hp.87 o1 120 150 o3 hp.87 55 80 hp.132 o3 55 80 hp.132 20 20 hp.180 d1 110 215 o1 120 150 hp.87 d6 90 205 d5 80 205 150 205 265 250 o2

ArchiCAD - · PDF fileo1 120 150 hp.87 o1 120 150 o3 hp.87 55 80 hp.132 o3 55 80 hp.132 20 20 hp.180 d1 110 215 o1 120 150 hp.87 d6 90 205 d5 80 205 150 205 265 250 o2

Documents
AMENDMENT C107 - LIST OF SUBMITTERS For (F) / Sub. No

AMENDMENT C107 - LIST OF SUBMITTERS For (F) / Sub. No

Documents
Dutchi Motors - Motorenpartner.de...DMA2-BrakedimensionsforseriesDMA280-132 DMAB2 132 8 150 3.000 DMA2B 112 7 3.000 485 12,0 1 DMA2B 80 4 DMA2B 90 5 Motorsize Braketype DMA2B 56 237

Dutchi Motors - Motorenpartner.de...DMA2-BrakedimensionsforseriesDMA280-132 DMAB2 132 8 150 3.000 DMA2B 112 7 3.000 485 12,0 1 DMA2B 80 4 DMA2B 90 5 Motorsize Braketype DMA2B 56 237

Documents
email submitters,thebestproductsonly,forex,

email submitters,thebestproductsonly,forex,

Entertainment & Humor
CV Review Program Guide – For CV Submitters

CV Review Program Guide – For CV Submitters

Documents
Methodology for submitters of project proposals, other ......1 Methodology for submitters of project proposals, other researchers and mentors in the Start pro-gramme This methodology

Methodology for submitters of project proposals, other ......1 Methodology for submitters of project proposals, other researchers and mentors in the Start pro-gramme This methodology

Documents
PLAN DE MANAGEMENT - Guvernul Romaniei · Web viewParcelele 132, 133,136,137,141,149, 150 B, 150 Dși 150 E din UP XI Cernişoara, OS Baia de Aramă(arealul Ciucevelor de Sus). Acestă

PLAN DE MANAGEMENT - Guvernul Romaniei · Web viewParcelele 132, 133,136,137,141,149, 150 B, 150 Dși 150 E din UP XI Cernişoara, OS Baia de Aramă(arealul Ciucevelor de Sus). Acestă

Documents
Reume/CV Review Program Guide – For Resume/CV Submitters

Reume/CV Review Program Guide – For Resume/CV Submitters

Documents
This page - QualifyGate6.3 Transmission Media 132 6.3.1 Guided Media 132 6.3.2 Unguided Media 141 6.4 Transmission Impairment 150 6.5 Design Issues of Physical Layer 152 6.6 EIA-232-D

This page - QualifyGate6.3 Transmission Media 132 6.3.1 Guided Media 132 6.3.2 Unguided Media 141 6.4 Transmission Impairment 150 6.5 Design Issues of Physical Layer 152 6.6 EIA-232-D

Documents
SUBMISSION BY MR ANTHONY MCCLEARY, MR GAVIN … · McCleary, Mr Gavin Ladbrook and Mrs Marilyn Ladbrook (the submitters). 2. The submitters own two parcels of land which are currently

SUBMISSION BY MR ANTHONY MCCLEARY, MR GAVIN … · McCleary, Mr Gavin Ladbrook and Mrs Marilyn Ladbrook (the submitters). 2. The submitters own two parcels of land which are currently

Documents
PART 2 – Submitters by number – Submitters 41-82 INDEX ...€¦ · 61 Greg Simpson 252 Napier Road,RD10,Hastings,New Zealand, 0211233091 gpsorchard@xtra.co.nz 132 62 Jonty Moffett

PART 2 – Submitters by number – Submitters 41-82 INDEX ...€¦ · 61 Greg Simpson 252 Napier Road,RD10,Hastings,New Zealand, 0211233091 [email protected] 132 62 Jonty Moffett

Documents