Upload
amita-sharma
View
216
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Partial Gene Sequence of Soluble Acid Invertase Genefrom Saccharum spontaneum: A First Report
Amaresh Chandra • Kriti Roopendra •
Amita Sharma • Radha Jain • Sushil Solomon
Received: 30 May 2013 / Revised: 20 August 2013 / Accepted: 30 October 2013 / Published online: 19 July 2014
� The National Academy of Sciences, India 2014
Abstract Sucrose is an important component of sugar-
cane yield and the enzymes, sucrose phosphate synthase,
sucrose synthase and invertases, work synergistically to
influence its metabolism, translocation and storage. Of the
invertases, soluble acid invertase (SAI) plays a pivotal role
in controlling the sucrose content in cane stalk vacuoles
and consequently, regulates the stored sucrose levels.
However, notably, no SAI gene sequence had yet been
reported for Saccharum spontaneum, one of the progenitors
of present day sugarcane, and thus, an endeavour was made
in this direction. Utilizing one (SAIF1/R1) of the six primer
pairs designed for SAI gene, in an earlier study, the first
ever nucleotide sequence was determined, specifically for
S. spontaneum SES34 (accession No.: KC570328). Addi-
tionally, the SAI gene sequence for Saccharum spp.
hybrids CoJ64 (an early maturing and high sucrose accu-
mulating variety of sugarcane) and for Saccharum offici-
narum 28NG210 (accession nos.: KC570326 and
KC570327, respectively) were also determined. Sequence
based phylogenetic tree showed close relatedness between
the SAI sequences for various Saccharum cultivars, thus
pointing to little genetic change while that for sorghum and
maize were relatively distantly related. Results help in
understanding source-sink process using species specific
genes.
Keywords Saccharum officinarum �Saccharum spontaneum � Sucrose � Invertase �Soluble acid invertase (SAI)
Introduction
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) is an inter-specific
hybrid derived from crosses of the domesticated species
Saccharum officinarum (a group that has sweet canes with
thick and juicy culms), natural hybrids (Saccharum sinense
and Saccharum barberi) and Saccharum spontaneum (a
wild species with no sugar and thin culms) [1]. It is an
important, sugar producing, C4 crop (family Poaceae) and
hence sucrose is an important component of its yield. It is
capable of accumulating up to 50 % of the total dry matter
of stalk as sucrose and storage parenchyma cells hoard
sucrose, which at maturity, usually attains levels of about
80 % of the dry weight and about 20 % of the fresh weight
[2]. High sucrose content in cane stalks is the utmost
important trait for farmers, and consequently for breeders
and agronomists as well. Thus, the crop is mainly valued in
terms of commercial cane sugar (CCS), in which sucrose
content is the dominant factor. At harvest, the quality of the
sugarcane juice is determined in terms of the concentration
of sucrose, such that high concentration of sucrose is a
prime. Sucrose begins to accumulate in the sugarcane in-
ternodes, when they start elongating and continues even
after elongation ceases [3]. During ripening, sucrose con-
centration increases along the entire stalk, while, in pro-
portion, the glucose and fructose concentrations decrease
significantly [4]. Thus, it is evident that sucrose metabo-
lism in the stalk also changes during development.
Sucrose is synthesized only in the cytosol by sucrose
phosphate synthase (SPS) or sucrose synthase (SS) enzymes,
but its distribution to various degrees between the apoplast,
the cytosol and the vacuole of the storage parenchyma is
monitored and controlled by invertases (b-fructofuranosid-
ase), thus, influencing the overall sucrose metabolism,
translocation and storage. Invertases are specifically known
A. Chandra (&) � K. Roopendra � A. Sharma � R. Jain �S. Solomon
Division of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Indian Institute
of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow 226002, India
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. (July–August 2014) 37(4):317–323
DOI 10.1007/s40009-014-0242-7
to catalyze the irreversible cleavage of sucrose into the two
hexoses i.e. glucose and fructose, utilizing ATP in the pro-
cess. Thus, the primary function of invertases is considered
to be that of supplying carbohydrates to the sink tissues and
in particular, acting as a key regulator of sucrose accumu-
lation in sugarcane stem parenchyma (culm/stalk) [5–8],
thus in turn, helping plant development and crop produc-
tivity. Based on their sub-cellular locations, invertases are
categorized into cell wall (CWI), vacuolar soluble acid
(SAI) and cytoplasmic neutral (NI) subgroups. The two
kinds of acid invertase, the soluble acid invertase, SAI
(vacuole) and the cell wall invertase, CWI (apoplast), both
exhibit optimum activity between pH 5.0 and 5.5 and cleave
fructose residue from disaccharides. They are also known to
hydrolyse other b-fructose containing disaccharides like
raffinose and stachiose [9].
SAI apparently plays a role in the remobilization of stored
sucrose from the vacuole and can hence be important in the
regulation of hexose levels in certain tissues [5, 6]. It is
known to play a prominent role in both sucrose import and
sugar signaling, particularly during the initiation of sink
growth and cell wall expansion, when there is a high need for
sucrose hydrolysis [10, 11]. Thus, SAI gene(s) contribute to
controlling the sucrose content in cane stalk vacuoles as well
as developmental processes during growth and maturation
of the plants. The SAI activity has been observed to go up at
times when growth is rapid, particularly in storage tissues
that are rapidly growing during internode growth and
development, and low at other times. Perhaps, SAI must be
low for sucrose accumulation and thus mature sucrose-
storing internodes of sugarcane have been found to contain
negligible SAI levels [9, 12, 13].
The expression and regulation of SAI during various
stages of cane growth development, maturity and post-
harvest sucrose inversion is an important determinant of
the sucrose yield and hence SAI is probably the most
extensively studied of the invertases. A variety of gene
isoforms exist for it, which have been shown to have dif-
ferent developmental and tissue specific expression pat-
terns, in various species. However, the gene sequence of
SAI had not yet been reported for the S. spontaneum spe-
cies, although, it being a progenitor of current day sugar-
cane, any information in its regard would be of benefit to
sugarcane research as a whole.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials and Isolation of Total RNA
Utilizing normal agronomical cultural practices S. sponta-
neum SES34, Saccharum spp. hybrids CoJ64 (an early
maturing and high sucrose accumulating variety of
sugarcane) and S. officinarum 28NG210 were grown at
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research farm, India, for the
present study. For isolation of total RNA, leaves were
collected and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. Ten
months old field grown plants were used to isolate the total
RNA utilizing Qiagen RNeasy mini kit following the
manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA contamination was
removed by using RNase free DNase (QIAGEN) solution.
The quality and integrity of isolated RNA was checked on
1.0 % agarose gel. The purified RNA was stored at -20 �C
until further use.
cDNA Synthesis and qRT-PCR Analysis
cDNA synthesis and quantitative reverse transcriptase
reactions were performed with all three RNA samples
isolated from S. spontaneum SES34, Saccharum spp.
hybrids CoJ64 and S. officinarum 28NG210 lines using
one-step RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN) wherein cDNA is initially
synthesized based on the gene sequences of soluble acid
invertases (SAI) designed by Chandra et al. [14]. The
primers (SAIF1/R1) sequences were F:50ATGGCCCGG
TGTACTACAAG30 and R:50AGCGCGTAGTAGTCATG
TCG30. A fragment of 650 bps of the SAI gene was
amplified. For internal control, actin gene primer pairs
(F-50GGACATCCAGCCTCTTGTC30/R-50GCAAGATCC
AAACGAAGAATGG30) were used. The reaction condi-
tions for qRT-PCR were as follows: 50 �C for 30 min
(cDNA synthesis step), 95 �C for 15 min (denaturation of
reverse transcriptase), 32 cycles consisting of 95 �C for
1 min, 58 �C for 1 min and 72 �C for 1 min and finally an
extension step of 72 �C for 20 min. PCR was performed in
PTC 200 thermal cycler (MJ Research/BioRad, USA). The
amplified DNA products from varieties of sugarcane were
eluted and cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector according to
the manufacturer’s instructions. After purification, recom-
binant clones were directly sequenced using suitable pri-
mer with an automated sequencer ABI 3730XL (Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
Data Analysis
Jalview (http://www.jalview.org/) [15] was used to visu-
alize the alignment of these three DNA sequences. Before
doing the sequence analysis, all DNA sequences were
screened for any plasmid sequence contamination using
VacScreen software available at NCBI web site. Also, the
online tool BLAST (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi)
was employed to run a nucleotide blast (blastn) for each of
the three sequences, in order to assess their degree of
similarity and homology using non redundant database.
Using the SAI sequence information available at NCBI, for
various Saccharum species as well as some closely related
318 A. Chandra et al.
123
species like sorghum and maize, a phylogenetic tree was
generated using the online tool ClustalW2 (http://www.
ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html) to get an insight into
their evolutionary relationship.
Results and Discussion
In our earlier study, DNA sequences of soluble acid inver-
tases (SAI) of 13 crops species were analysed for sequence
homology and based on the most conserved gene region, six
primer-pairs (forward and reverse) were designed by
Chandra et al. [14]. Following trail from this study, we
employed the SAIF1/R1 primer F: ATGGCCCGGTGT
ACTACAAG R: AGCGCGTAGTAGTCATGTCG (from
Saccharum spp.; accession No.: AY302083) and isolated and
amplified a 650 bp fragment from two species namely S.
spontaneum SES34 and S. officinarum 28NG210 and a sug-
arcane variety namely Saccharum spp. hybrids CoJ64. The
DNA sequences obtained from these species and variety
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
11
1
2323
23
A C T A CG CG C T CG G G A G G T A TG A CA C T A CG CG C T CG G G A G G T A TG A C
A C T A CG CG C T CG G G A G G T A TG A C
A C T A CG CG C T CG G G A G G T A TG A C
24
24
24
46
46
46
G CG G C CG C C A A CG CG TG G A CG C C
G CG G C TG C C A A CG CG TG G A CG C C
G CG G C CG C C A A CG CG TG G A CG C C
G CG G C CG C C A A CG CG TG G A CG C C
47
4747
69
6969
G C TG G A CG C CG A G A A G G A CG T CG
G C T CG A CG C CG A G A A G G A CG T CGG C T CG A CG C CG A G A A G G A CG T CG
G C T CG A CG C CG A G A A G G A CG T CG
7070
70
9292
92
G C A C CG G C C TG CG G T A CG A C TG GG C A C CG G C C TG CG G T A CG A C TG G
G C A C CG G C C TG CG G T A CG A C TG G
G C A C CG G C C TG CG G T A CG A C TG G
93
93
93
115
115
115
G G C A A G T T C T A CG CG T C C A A G A C
G G C A A G T T C T A CG CG T C C A A G A C
G G C A A G T T C T A CG CG T C C A A G A C
G G C A A G T T C T A CG CG T C C A A G A C
116
116116
138
138138
G T T C T A CG A C C CG G C C A A G CG C C
G T T C T A CG A C C CG G C C A A G CG C CG T T C T A CG A C C CG G C C A A G CG C C
Fig. 1 Multiple sequence
alignment (MSA) result for
nucleotide sequences of SAI for
Saccharum spontaneum SES34,
Saccharum spp. hybrids CoJ64
and Saccharum officinarum
28NG210, using Jalview
Partial Gene Sequence of Soluble Acid Invertase Gene 319
123
were presumably belonging to SAI gene. Thus, we deter-
mined the first ever nucleotide sequence of SAI, specifically
for S. spontaneum SES34, now available at GenBank (NCBI)
(accession No.: KC570328). In addition, we have also
reported the first SAI gene sequence for Saccharum spp.
hybrid CoJ64 (an early maturing and high sucrose accumu-
lating variety of sugarcane) and for S. officinarum 28NG210
(accession nos.: KC570326 and KC570327, respectively).
Putative DNA sequences obtained from the amplified
products from two species namely S. spontaneum SES34
and S. officinarum 28NG210 and a sugarcane variety namely
Saccharum spp. hybrids CoJ64, were aligned using the
multiple sequence alignment viewer, Jalview (the alignment
result is shown in Fig. 1). The results showed high sequence
conservation; however, the sequence corresponding to S.
spontaneum mismatched with that of the other two, at
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
G T T C T A CG A C C CG G C C A A G CG C C
139139
139
161161
161
G C CG CG TG C T C TG G G G A TG G G T CG C CG CG TG C T C TG G G G A TG G G T C
G C CG CG TG C T C TG G G G A TG G G T C
G C CG CG TG C T C TG G G G A TG G G T C
162
162
162
184
184
184
G G CG A G A C CG A C T CG G A G CG CG C
G G CG A G A C CG A C T CG G A G CG CG C
G G CG A G A C CG A C T CG G A G CG CG C
G G CG A G A C CG A C T CG G A G CG CG C
185
185185
207
207207
TG A CG T C T C C A A G G G A TG G G C A T
TG A CG T C T C C A A G G G A TG G G C A TTG A CG T C T C C A A G G G A TG G G C A T
TG A CG T C T C C A A G G G A TG G G C A T
208208
208
230230
230
CG C TG C A G G G G A T C C C C CG G A CGCG C TG C A G G G T A T C C C C CG G A CG
CG C TG C A G G G T A T C C C C CG G A CG
CG C TG C A G G G T A T C C C C CG G A CG
231
231
231
253
253
253
G TG C TG C TG G A C A C C A A G A CG G G
G TG C TG C TG G A C A C C A A G A CG G G
G TG C TG C TG G A C A C C A A G A CG G G
G TG C TG C TG G A C A C C A A G A CG G G
254
254254
276
276276
C A G C A A C C TG C TG C A G TG G C C CG
C A G C A A C C TG C TG C A G TG G C C CGC A G C A A C C TG C TG C A G TG G C C CG
Fig. 1 continued
320 A. Chandra et al.
123
Table 1 Pair-wise alignment scores for nucleotide sequences of SAI for S. spontaneum SES34, Saccharum spp. hybrids CoJ64 and S. offici-
narum 28NG210, generated using ClustalW2
SeqA Name Length SeqB Name Length Score
1 SAI_S._spontaneum 344 2 SAI_S._officinarum 344 99.0
1 SAI_S._spontaneum 344 3 SAI_S._spp. hybrids 344 98.0
2 SAI_S._officinarum 344 3 SAI_S._spp. hybrids 344 99.0
Table 2 Prediction results for nucleotide sequences of SAI for Saccharum spontaneum SES34, Saccharum officinarum 28NG210 and Sac-
charum spp. hybrids CoJ64 using BLAST
Query No. of BLAST hits Top hits (2) Bit score E value Identities
SAI_S._spontaneum
SES34
71 Saccharum hybrid cultivar FN-28 soluble
acid invertase (SAI) mRNA, complete
cds
634 bits (343) 1e-178 343/343 (100 %)
Saccharum hybrid cultivar H65-7052
soluble acid invertase (scinvh3’2)
mRNA, partial cds
634 bits (343) 1e-178 343/343 (100 %)
SAI_S._officinarum
28NG210
66 Saccharum officinarum soluble acid
invertase mRNA, partial cds
625 bits (338) 8e-176 341/343 (99 %)
Saccharum robustum soluble acid
invertase mRNA, partial cds
625 bits (338) 8e-176 341/343 (99 %)
SAI_S. spp. hybrids
CoJ64
66 Saccharum officinarum soluble acid
invertase mRNA, partial cds
616 bits(333) 5e-173 338/341(99 %)
Saccharum robustum soluble acid
invertase mRNA, partial cds
616 bits(333) 5e-173 338/341(99 %)
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344
KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
KC570328.1_SacspontSES34SAI/1-344
KC570326.1_SachybridCoJ64SAI/1-344KC570327.1_Sacoffic28NG210SAI/1-344
Consensus
C A G C A A C C TG C TG C A G TG G C C CG
277277
277
299299
299
TG G A G G A A G TG G A G A CG C TG CG CTG G A G G A A G TG G A G A CG C TG CG C
TG G A G G A A G TG G A G A CG C TG CG C
TG G A G G A A G TG G A G A CG C TG CG C
300
300
300
322
322
322
A C C A A C T C C A C CG A C C T C A G CG G
A C C A A C T C C A CG G A C C T C A G CG G
A C C A A C T C C A CG G A C C T C A G CG G
A C C A A C T C C A CG G A C C T C A G CG G
323
323323
344
344344
C A T C A C C A T CG A C T A CG G C T C A
C A T C A C C A T CG A C T A CG G C A C AC A T C A C C A T CG A C T A CG G C T C A
C A T C A C C A T CG A C T A CG G C T C AFig. 1 continued
Partial Gene Sequence of Soluble Acid Invertase Gene 321
123
residue No. 50, 218 and 311 while the sequence for Sac-
charum spp. hybrids CoJ64 mismatched with that of the
other two at residue No. 29 and 342. Using ClustalW2
(http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/clustalw2/index.html) the
overall MSA (Multiple Sequence Alignment) score, was
found to be 8153 while the pair-wise alignment scores were,
as shown in Table 1. Also, the online tool BLAST
(http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was employed to
run a nucleotide blast (blastn) for each of the three sequen-
ces, in order to assess their degree of similarity and
homology using non redundant database. BLAST results are
summarized in Table 2. The phylogenetic tree generated,
using ClustalW2 (shown in Fig. 2), as expected, showed
close relatedness between the SAI sequence for various
Saccharum cultivars, thus pointing to little genetic change
while that for sorghum and maize were relatively distantly
related. This sequence information will be useful and may
henceforth be utilized in conducting expression analysis of
genes involved in metabolism of sucrose, which would
otherwise, in the absence of such DNA sequence informa-
tion, require construction and employment of primer-pairs
using gene sequences from related crops.
The major setback to yield from stale cane is due to
inversion of sucrose into glucose and fructose, leading to
significant loss of sucrose. Thus, future research attempts
should be oriented towards examining the role of sugar
metabolising systems, for employment in transgenic
manipulation of sucrose accumulation in sugarcane [16].
The reduction of invertase activity soon after harvest of
sugarcane crop could be useful in minimizing the post
harvest sucrose losses [17]. With more and more sequence
information being generated, the challenge of increasing
sucrose yield in sugarcane may be met by careful down/up
regulation of these enzymes involved in sucrose metabo-
lism. Thus, RNAi approach may be employed for exploring
possibilities of controlling the level of invertases at suitable
locations [18].
References
1. Papini-Terzi FS, Rocha FR, Vencio RZN, Felix JM, Branco DS,
Waclawovsky AJ, Del Bem LEV, Lembke CG, Costa MDL,
Nishiyama MY Jr, Vicentini R, Vincentz MGA, Ulian EC,
Menossi M, Souza GM (2009) Sugarcane genes associated with
sucrose content. BMC Genom 10:120
2. Inman-Bamber NG, Bonnett GD, Spillman MF, Hewitt ML,
Jackson J (2008) Increasing sucrose accumulation in sugarcane
by manipulating leaf extension and photosynthesis with irriga-
tion. Aust J Agric Res 59:13–26
3. Lingle SE, Smith RC (1991) Sucrose metabolism related to
growth and ripening in sugarcane internodes. Crop Sci
31:172–177
4. Fernandes AC, Benda GTA (1985) Distribution pattern of brix
and fibre in the primary stalk of sugarcane. Sugarcane 5:8–13
5. Hatch MD, Glasziou KT (1963) Sugar accumulation cycle in
sugarcane. II. Relationship of invertase activity to sugar content
and growth rate in storage tissue of plants grown in controlled
environments. Plant Physiol 38:344–348
6. Sacher JA, Hatch MD, Glasziou KT (1963) Sugar accumulation
cycle in sugarcane. III. Physical and metabolic aspects in
immature storage tissues. Plant Physiol 38:348–354
7. Gayler KR, Glasziou KT (1971) Physiological functions of acid
and neutral invertases in growth and sugar storage in sugarcane.
Physiol Plant 27:25–31
8. Zhu YJ, Komor E, Moore PH (1997) Sucrose accumulation in the
sugarcane stem is regulated by the difference between the
activities of soluble acid invertase and sucrose phosphate syn-
thase. Plant Physiol 115:609–616
9. Venkataramana S, Naidu KM, Singh S (1991) Invertases and
growth factors dependent sucrose accumulation in sugarcane.
Plant Sci 74:65–72
10. Tymowska-Lalanne Z, Kreis M (1998) The plant invertases:
physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. Adv Bot Res
28:71–117
11. Richardo CPP, Rees TAP (1970) Invertase activity during
development of carrot roots. Phytochemistry 9:239–247
12. Walker RP, Winters AL, Pollock CJ (1997) Purification and
characterization of invertases from leaves of Lolium temulentum.
New Phytol 135:259–266
13. Lontom W, Kosittrakun M, Lingle SE (2008) Relationship of acid
invertase activities to sugar content in sugarcane internodes
during ripening and after harvest. Thai J Agri Sci 41:143–151
14. Chandra A, Jain R, Rai RK, Solomon S (2010) Designing and
application of sucrose controlling enzyme soluble acid invertase
Fig. 2 Phylogenetic tree
generated by ClustalW2 tool
(UPGMA clustering), using SAI
nucleotide sequence of various
Saccharum species, maize and
sorghum
322 A. Chandra et al.
123
(SAI) gene based primer-pairs in sugarcane. Natl Acad Sci Lett
33:355–360
15. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ
(2009) Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor
and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191
16. Chandra A, Jain R, Solomon S (2012) Complexities of invertases
controlling sucrose accumulation and retention in sugarcane: the
way forward. Curr Sci 102:857–866
17. Chandra A (2011) Physio-biochemical and molecular approaches
to enhance sucrose content in sugarcane: Indian initiatives.
SugarTech 13:315–321
18. Chandra A, Jain R, Rai RK, Solomon S (2011) Revisiting the
source-sink paradigm in sugarcane. Curr Sci 100:978–980
Partial Gene Sequence of Soluble Acid Invertase Gene 323
123