Upload
jaeger
View
27
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
PARTICIPATION IN THE DESIGN AND R&D ACTIVITIES FOR A FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDER:. Accelerator and Detector aspects. A. Faus-Golfe IFIC - Valencia. FPA2005-02935. Outline. Scientific project Main goals Accelerator Physics Machine Detector Interface Detectors Personnel & Task. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
PARTICIPATION IN THE DESIGN AND R&D ACTIVITIES FOR A FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDER:
A. Faus-GolfeIFIC - Valencia
Accelerator and Detector aspects
FPA2005-02935
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
2
Outline
• Scientific project Main goals
Accelerator Physics Machine Detector Interface Detectors
• Personnel & Task
See Carlos Lacasta’s Talk
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
3
Scientific project: Main Goals
Our project pretends to initiate/consolidate the participation of the IFIC to the ILC effort in both aspects:
Machine Detector Interface
Machine Detector
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
4
The IFIC participation has already started with:
• A feasibility study of a non-linear collimation system for CLIC in 2002 in collaboration with CERN. A doctoral thesis started in the beginning of 2004: ”Design and Performance Evaluation of a Nonlinear Collimation System for CLIC and LHC” (CERN doctoral students program)
• Participation in the European Project CARE-ELAN in the beginning of 2004
• Participation in the specific design study EUROTeV, approved in late 2004
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
5
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects Feasibility of a non-linear collimation system for
– Design Optics
– Non-linear impact on the BDS
– Cleaning efficiency
– Spoiler survival
– Application to other collimation systems (LHC, ILC)
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
6
Ongoing work:
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
•Design Optics–Optics with bends between the skews shows better performance from the collimation efficiency point of view but there is no complete cancellation of the geometric aberration and the luminosity is very poor–New optics with no bends between the skews to avoid the luminosity degradation keeping good collimation efficiency[T.Asaka, A.Faus-Golfe, J.Resta López, D. Schulte and F. Zimmermann “Alternatives Design for Collimation system” To be published ]
See A. Faus-Golfe talk
in Nanobeam 05 and CLIC BDS Day
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
7
1st optics solution:SkSk Sp
No bends between the skews
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
8
2nd optics solution: Sk SkSp
Bends between the skews
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
9
Ongoing work: • Collimation survival
– install perfect spoiler & perform simulations with MAD and PLACET
[T.Asaka, J. Resta López “Characterization and Performance of the CLIC BDS with MAD, SAD and PLACET” ELAN (2005)]
– consider real spoiler with scattering, install absorbers, optimize absorber locations, run BDSIM or SIXTRACK or MARS simulations (linear system already contains spoilers and absorbers)
[Drozhdin et al, “Comparison of the TESLA, NLC and Beam Collimation system performance” CLIC Note 555 (2003)]
• Chromatic properties & Luminosity performance & Beam size at the spoiler vs sextupole strength & average momentun off-set
See J. Resta López talk in
CLIC BDS Day
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
10
Optics lattice
MADPlacetSAD
…
Entrance:IP:
Multiparticle tracking
Beam-beaminteraction
Guinea-Pig
performancetransport
Lie
Importance of the benchmarking of codes
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
11
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
12
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
13
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
14
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
15
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
16
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
17
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
18
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
19
Scientific Project: Main Goals Accelerator aspects
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
20
Scientific Project: Main Goals Machine Detector InterfaceDesign study of the disrupted and energy degraded beam after the IP. Impact in the tracking performance. Simulations based on realistic beam conditions including the halo:
• identify and estimate losses in the spent beam transport line
• study of installation of relevant post-IP beam diagnostic (luminosity, energy and energy spread and polarisation monitors)
Collaboration: A doctoral thesis started in the beginning of 2005: ”Design and Performance Evaluation of the MDI system for the ILC” (EU doctoral students program)
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
21
Ongoing work:
•Beam parameters for e-e- mode operation at the ILC–e-e- shows sharper deflection curves (feedback slower) and faster luminosity drop with offset (more stringent constraints on residual offset) that makes feedback very difficult
–Alternative beam parameters: increase of y (steepness can
be reduced at the expense of a factor 2 in L) and decrease x (smoother deflection curve and partly recovered L at the expense of a factor 2 in b)
[C.Alabau, P.Bambade and A.Faus-Golfe, “Beam-Beam parameters for e-e- mode operation at ILC” To be published ]
See C. A
labau talk in
ECFA S
tudy on P
hysics and
detectors
for I
LC
Scientific Project: Main Goals Machine Detector Interface
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
22
-300
-200
-100
0
100
200
300
-75 -25 25 75
y-offset (nm)
Bea
m 1
ou
tgo
ing
y-a
ng
le (
m rad
)
σy=σyo
σy=2σyo
σy=3σyo
σy=5σyo
0
1E+33
2E+33
3E+33
4E+33
5E+33
-75 -25 25 75
y-offset (nm)
Lu
min
osi
ty (
cm-2s
-1)
σy=σyo
σy=2σyo
σy=3σyo
σy=5σyo
e-e- Deflection Angles (σx=σxo)
Increasing y
Scientific Project: Main Goals Machine Detector Interface
e-e- Luminosity (σx=σxo)
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
-75 -25 25 75
y-offset (nm)
B (
%)
σy=σyo
σy=2σyo
σy=3σyo
σy=5σyo
e-e- Beamstrahlung Loss (σx=σxo)
- better deflection curve
- similar beamstrahlung energy loss
- lower luminosity (factor 2)
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
23
-500
-300
-100
100
300
500
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
y-offset (nm)
Bea
m 1
ou
tgo
ing
y-a
ng
le (
m rad
)
e-e-nominalσy=5σyo
σy=7σyo
σy=10σyo
σy=12σyo
e+e-(beam2)
0
1E+33
2E+33
3E+33
4E+33
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
y-offset (nm)
Lu
min
osi
ty (
cm-2
s-1) e-e- nominal
σy=5σyo
σy=7σyo
σy=10σyo
σy=12σyo
e-e- Deflection Angles (σx=0.5σxo) e-e- Luminosity (σx=0.5σxo)
- better deflection curve / luminosity
- greater beamstrahlung energy loss
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
y-offset (nm)
B (
%)
e-e- nominal
σy=5σyo
σy=7σyo
σy=10σyo
σy=12σyo
e-e- Beamstrahlung Loss (σx=0.5σxo)
problems for physics?
problems for beam extraction
(maximum ~5-6%)
Scientific Project: Main Goals Machine Detector Interface
Decreasing x
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
24
Personnel & Tasks
TASK PERSONNEL
Feasibility of a non-linear collimation system A. Faus-GolfeParticle tracking along BDS J. Resta Lopez
Machine Detector Interface A. Faus-Golfe J. Fuster Verdú C. Alabau Pons
R&D on Si Detectors C. Lacasta LlacerParticipation on the design of tracking system J. Fuster Verdú Post-doc I. Carbonell Mechanical Eng.
1-3/12/05 A.Faus-Golfe
25
Other related Project: Accelerator aspects
Further work:
Beam Instrumentation for TBL at CTF3/CLEX:
– Mechanics
See F.Toral and Y. Kubyshin talks