23
Particle multiplicities in Minimum Bias events with the ATLAS detector Rémi ZAIDAN, The University of Iowa on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration. APS April Meeting 2011

Particle multiplicities in Minimum Bias events with the ATLAS detector

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Particle multiplicities in Minimum Bias events with the ATLAS detector. APS April Meeting 2011. Rémi ZAIDAN , The University of Iowa on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration. Measurements and Motivations. Measurements made by the ATLAS detector : - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Particle multiplicities in Minimum Bias events with the ATLAS detector

Rémi ZAIDAN, The University of Iowa on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.

APS April Meeting 2011

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 2

• Physics motivation: improve the understanding of non-perturbative QCD.– by studying the properties of inelastic proton-proton collisions.

• Experimental motivation: model the pileup and underlying events.– Necessary for measuring physics processes at high energies.

• For the first time modeling of our detector is confronted to reality.

Measurements and Motivations

4/30/2011

inelastic

ediffractivdoubleediffractivsingleediffractivnonelastictotal

• Measurements made by the ATLAS detector:– Charged particle multiplicity, it’s dependence on pT and h and it’s correlation with pT.

chTT

ch

Tev

ch

evch

ev

ev

nvspdpd

Nd

pNd

dN

Ndn

dN

N.;

2

11;

1;

1 2

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 3

ATLAS detector overview

4/30/2011

• Pixels Detector: |h|<2.5– 3 barrel layers, 3 end-cap disks.– σrϕ 10 μ∼ m ; σz 115 ∼ μm

• Silicon Strip Detector (SCT): |h|<2.5– 4 barrel layers, 9 end-cap disks.– σrϕ 17 μm ; σ∼ z 580 μm∼

• Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT): |h|<2.1– ~ 32 quasi-continuous hits per track.– σr 130 μm∼

• Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillators:– 2 wheels at ±3.6 m:

• 8 cells: 2.12 < |η| < 2.83• 8 cells: 2.83 < |η| < 3.8

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 4

Overview of the analysis

4/30/2011

• Data samples:– 0.9 TeV: ~0.35 M events, ~4.5 M tracks (~7 mb-1).– 2.36 TeV: ~6 K events, ~ 40 K tracks (~0.1 mb-1).• The SCT detector was not at it’s nominal operation

mode:– Large systematics on pT measurements.

– Cannot go below pT = 500 MeV: particles need to cross the TRT because the pixel detector by itself does not provide a reliable pT measurement.

– 7 TeV: ~10 M events, ~210 M tracks (~190 mb-1).

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 5

Overview of the analysis

4/30/2011

• Analysis strategy:– All results are presented at hadron level

without correcting for diffractive components (details in backup slide):

• an iterative Bayesian procedure is used to correct charged particle multiplicity.

– Trigger: single arm minimum bias trigger.– Event selection: vertex + ≥ 2 tracks– Track selection: apply various quality cuts

and remove non-primary* tracks by cutting on impact parameter at the primary vertex.

– Phase-space: pT > 100 MeV ; |h| < 2.5 ; nch ≥ 2.

(pT > 500 MeV for 2.36 TeV)

*A primary particle is a direct product of hadronization or the product of a primary

particle whose lifetime is t < 10-11 s

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 6

Track ReconstructionValidation

4/30/2011

Basic track quantities show good agreement

between data and Monte Carlo:

Several corrections are applied to the Monte

Carlo plots to take into account beam spot

effects, disabled detector elements and

differences in the pT spectrum.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 7

Track reconstruction

4/30/2011

• Tracking efficiency is determined from MC:– MC is validated against data.– parameterized as function of pT and .

• Main systematic uncertainties are due to the material mis-modeling in the MC. This was done using two complementary methods:– Look at bias in reconstructed K0 mass due to

energy loss (sensitive to radiation length).– Look at the fraction of tracks in the pixel

detector that are matched to a track in the full inner detector (sensitive to interaction length).

• Rate of non primary tracks is estimated from data:– by fitting the tails of the impact parameter

distributions.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 8

Results: nch distribution

4/30/2011

Predictions for various models differ between each other, and do not agree well with the data.

At low nch, this is partially explained by the fact that the diffractive components play an important role in this region.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 9

Results: dNch/dh

4/30/2011

The shape of the h distribution is well described by the different Models.

Discrepancies can be seen in the normalization.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 10

Results: 1/2πpT · 1/Nev · d2Nch/dηdpT

4/30/2011

Measurements span 12 orders of magnitude.Model predictions agree better with data at intermediate momenta (0.5 to 3 GeV).

Large differences between measurements and predictions are seen at low and high pT.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 11

Results: <pT> vs. nch

4/30/2011

Predictions for various models

differ significantly

between each other especially

at high nch.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 12

Comparison with other experiments

4/30/2011

• Results from the various experiments agree rather well:– ALICE sees slightly less tracks at central

pseudo-rapidity than ATLAS and CMS.– Still agree within 1 sigma of the total

uncertainty.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 13

Conclusion

4/30/2011

• Presented charged particle multiplicity measurements with the ATLAS detector at √s = 0.9 TeV, √s = 2.36 TeV and √s = 7 TeV.

• The charged particle multiplicity per unit of pseudo-rapidity at h=0 and pT>100 MeV was measured to be:– 5.635 ± 0.002 (stat.) ± 0.149 (syst.) at

√s = 7 TeV.– 3.486 ± 0.001 (stat.) ± 0.077 (syst.) at

√s = 0.9 TeV.• The difference between models are

larger at high √s for pT > 100 MeV.– The measured charged particle density is

higher than model predictions.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 14

Back up slides

4/30/2011

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 15

• Events are triggered with at least one hit on either sides of the MBTS scintillators.

• Efficiency measured on data with respect to a random trigger with a requirement on the minimal activity in the inner detector (Space Points trigger).

• Efficiency was checked to be flat in pT and h.

The Minimum Bias Trigger

4/30/2011

Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillators

Inner Detector

PointsSpace

PointsSpaceMBTSefficiency

&

• The trigger efficiency is parameterized as function of : the number of selected tracks where the tracks were extrapolated to the beam spot instead of the primary vertex in the absence of the vertex

BSseln

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 16

Vertex requirement

4/30/2011

• Tracks used to reconstruct the primary vertex are selected with slightly tighter cuts than the analysis tracks.

• The vertex efficiency is measured from data.– It is parameterized as function of the number of

selected tracks.– The dependencies on the longitudinal impact

parameter spread (Dz0) and pT for events with low track multiplicity are also taken into account.

• Pileup events removed:– veto events with a 2nd vertex with ≥ 4 tracks– Data was taken when pileup rate was ~ 0.1%

Dz0

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 17

Pileup removal

4/30/2011

• The fraction of events with more than one p-p interaction is estimated to be around 0.1% for the data collected at 7 TeV.

• The presence of such events might bias the tails on the nch distribution.

• Expect ~1% of events with a second reconstructed vertex:

– mostly fakes and secondary vertices with few tracks.

• Remove events with a second vertex with more than 3 tracks.

• Residual effects after pileup removal:– Fake pileup events removed: 0.03%– True pileup events not removed : 0.01%– True Pileup events reconstructed as single

vertex: 0.01%

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 18

Track selection cuts

4/30/2011

• Phase space: – pT > 100 MeV ; |h| < 2.5

• Tight impact parameter:– |d0| < 1.5 mm ; |z0sin(q)|<1.5 mm– whenever needed for events with no vertex, extrapolate tracks to beam spot and cut on

transverse impact parameter: |d0BS| < 1.5 mm

• B-Layer hit:– Only if expected (track doesn’t extrapolate to dead detector element).– Require 1 pixel hit if no B-Layer hit is expected.

• SCT hit requirements:– 100 < pT < 200 MeV: 2 SCT hits

– 200 < pT < 300 MeV: 4 SCT hits

– pT > 300 MeV: 6 SCT hits

• Track fit probability:– pT > 10 GeV : prob(c2,ndof) > 0.01

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 19

Non primary tracks

4/30/2011

• The rate of non-primary tracks is estimated by fitting the tails of the transverse impact parameter distribution on data:– Contribution from conversion

electrons and other types of non-primaries are fitted simultaneously.

– Results validated by fitting the longitudinal impact parameter as electrons from conversion look identical to other type of non-primary tracks.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 20

High pT tracks

4/30/2011

• Large fractions of tracks at high pT are badly measured due to conspiracy of multiple effects:

– Large extrapolation at high h between Pixel and SCT detectors.– Hadronic interactions between Pixel and SCT detectors causing the tracks to “kink” in the

opposite direction of their curvature.– Rapidly falling pT spectrum such that a small migration from low pT become significant at high

pT.

• Remove those tracks by cutting on the c2 probability of the track fit for pT > 10 GeV.

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 21

• All results are corrected back to the hadron level:– No attempt to subtract diffractive components.

• Event level correction for vertex and trigger efficiencies:

• Track level correction for tracking efficiency, non-primary tracks and tracks from outside of the kinematic range:

• Unfolding of the charged particle multiplicity distribution using a recursive Bayesian approach (a similar approach is used to correct for pT resolution):

• Correct analytically for events lost in the nsel=0,1 bins:

Correction Procedure

4/30/2011

)(

1

)(

1)(

BSselvtx

BSseltrig

BSselev nnnw

)),(1()),(1(),(

1),( sec

TokrT

TtrkTtrk pfpf

ppw

))1()1(1()1,0|( 1 chch ntrktrkch

ntrkselch nnnP

)(

)()|()|(;)|()()(

2 sel

chchselselch

nselchselch nP

nPnnPnnPnnPnPnP

sel

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 22

Monte Carlo Models

4/30/2011

*AMBT1: New tune giving a high weight to the recent ATLAS results with pT > 500 MeV and nch ≥ 6.

MC model Description

Pythia 8 Includes a hard component to the diffraction unlike Pythia 6.

Pythia 6.4:AMBT1

Tuned including ATLAS data. Based on the MC09 tune with reduced color reconnection. Focuses on matching ATLAS measurements in non-diffractive

regimes.

Pythia 6.4:MC09

The ATLAS collaboration’s tune to CDF data at taken at 630 GeV and 1.8 TeV. Uses pT-ordered shower & color reconnection. The ISR and MPI cutoff scales

are tuned separately. Uses the MRST LO* PDF.

Pythia 6.4:DW

By Rick Field. Maximal ISR, virtuality-ordered shower. To fit data on the di-jet angular distribution measured by the D0 collaboration. Tune is intended to

provide a good description of the underlying event, but high ISR yields mismatches in other processes.

PhoJetDual Parton Model based, using pomeron exchange for soft QCD interactions. Incorporates a model for high-mass diffraction dissociation including multi-jet

production. The parameters & Pythia version used in the ATLAS tune are different from the standard tune by Ralph Engel

Remi ZAIDAN - APS April Meeting 2011 23

References

4/30/2011

• ATLAS latest paper on minimum bias measurements at 0.9, 2.36 and 7 TeV:– arXiv:1012.5104v1 [hep-ex]

• ATLAS conference notes with more details and preliminary results:– 0.9 and 7 TeV: ATLAS-CONF-2010-046– 2.36 TeV: ATLAS-CONF-2010-047

• Minimum bias comparison plots between LHC experiments:– http://lpcc.web.cern.ch/LPCC/index.php?page=mb_ue_wg_docs

• Monte Carlo Tunes:– MC09 : PHYS-PUB-2010-002– AMBT1: ATLAS-CONF-2010-031

• ATLAS detector description:– The ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider,

JINST 3 (2008) S08003