2
It is June 6, Sue McCaskey’s first day in the newly created position of materials manager for Parts Emporium. A recent graduate of a prominent business school, McCaskey is eagerly awaiting her first real-world problem. At approximately 8:30 A.M. it arrives in the form of status reports on inventory and orders shipped. At the top of an extensive computer printout is a handwritten note from Joe Donnell, the purchasing manager: “Attached you will find the inventory and customer service performance data. Rest assured that the individual inventory levels are accu- rate because we took a complete physical inventory count at the end of last week. Unfortunately, we don’t keep com- piled records in some of the areas as you requested. However, you’re welcome to do so yourself. Welcome aboard!” A little upset that aggregate information is not avail- able, McCaskey decides to randomly select a small sample of approximately 100 items and compile inventory and customer service characteristics to get a feel for the “total picture.” The results of this experiment reveal to her why Parts Emporium decided to create the position she now fills. It seems that the inventory is in all the wrong places. Although there is an average of approximately 60 days of inventory, customer service is inadequate. Parts Emporium tries to backorder the customer orders not immediately filled from stock, but some 10 percent of demand is being lost to competing distributorships. Because stockouts are costly relative to inventory holding costs, McCaskey believes that a cycle-service level of at least 95 percent should be achieved. Parts Emporium, Inc., was formed in 1973 as a whole- sale distributor of automobile parts by two disenchanted auto mechanics, Dan Block and Ed Spriggs. Originally located in Block’s garage, the firm showed slow but steady growth until 1976, when it relocated to an old, abandoned meat-packing warehouse on Chicago’s South Side. With increased space for inventory storage, the company was able to begin offering an expanded line of auto parts. This increased selection, combined with the trend toward longer car ownership, led to an explosive growth of the business. By 1998, Parts Emporium was the largest inde- pendent distributor of auto parts in the North Central region. In 2000, Parts Emporium relocated in a sparkling new office and warehouse complex off Interstate 55 in subur- ban Chicago. The warehouse space alone occupied more than 100,000 square feet. Although only a handful of new products have been added since the warehouse was con- structed, its utilization has increased from 65 percent to more than 90 percent of capacity. During this same period, however, sales growth has stagnated. These conditions motivated Block and Spriggs to hire the first manager from outside the company in the firm’s history. Sue McCaskey knows that although her influence to initiate changes will be limited, she must produce positive results immediately. Thus, she decides to concentrate on two products from the extensive product line: the EG151 exhaust gasket and the DB032 drive belt. If she can demonstrate significant gains from proper inventory man- agement for just two products, perhaps Block and Spriggs will give her the backing needed to change the total inven- tory management system. The EG151 exhaust gasket is purchased from an over- seas supplier, Haipei, Inc. Actual demand for the first 21 weeks of 2001 is shown in the following table: WEEK ACTUAL DEMAND WEEK ACTUAL DEMAND 1 104 12 97 2 103 13 99 3 107 14 102 4 105 15 99 5 102 16 103 6 102 17 101 7 101 18 101 8 104 19 104 9 100 20 108 10 100 21 97 11 103 A quick review of past orders, shown in another docu- ment, indicates that a lot size of 150 units is being used and that the lead time from Haipei is fairly constant at two weeks. Currently, at the end of week 21, no inventory is on hand; 11 units are backordered, and there is a scheduled receipt of 150 units. The DB032 drive belt is purchased from the Bendox Corporation of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Actual demand so far in 2001 is shown in the following table: WEEK ACTUAL DEMAND WEEK ACTUAL DEMAND 11 18 17 50 12 33 18 53 13 53 19 54 14 54 20 49 15 51 21 52 16 53 Because this product is new, data are available only since its introduction in week 11. Currently, 324 units are on hand; there are no backorders and no scheduled receipts. A lot size of 1,000 units is being used, with the lead time fairly constant at three weeks. CASE PARTS EMPORIUM continued

Parts Emporium Case Study.pdf

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Parts Emporium Case Study

Citation preview

Page 1: Parts Emporium Case Study.pdf

It is June 6, Sue McCaskey’s first day in the newly createdposition of materials manager for Parts Emporium. Arecent graduate of a prominent business school, McCaskeyis eagerly awaiting her first real-world problem. Atapproximately 8:30 A.M. it arrives in the form of statusreports on inventory and orders shipped. At the top of anextensive computer printout is a handwritten note fromJoe Donnell, the purchasing manager: “Attached you willfind the inventory and customer service performance data.Rest assured that the individual inventory levels are accu-rate because we took a complete physical inventory countat the end of last week. Unfortunately, we don’t keep com-piled records in some of the areas as you requested.However, you’re welcome to do so yourself. Welcomeaboard!”

A little upset that aggregate information is not avail-able, McCaskey decides to randomly select a small sampleof approximately 100 items and compile inventory andcustomer service characteristics to get a feel for the “totalpicture.” The results of this experiment reveal to her whyParts Emporium decided to create the position she nowfills. It seems that the inventory is in all the wrong places.Although there is an average of approximately 60 days ofinventory, customer service is inadequate. Parts Emporiumtries to backorder the customer orders not immediatelyfilled from stock, but some 10 percent of demand is beinglost to competing distributorships. Because stockouts arecostly relative to inventory holding costs, McCaskeybelieves that a cycle-service level of at least 95 percentshould be achieved.

Parts Emporium, Inc., was formed in 1973 as a whole-sale distributor of automobile parts by two disenchantedauto mechanics, Dan Block and Ed Spriggs. Originallylocated in Block’s garage, the firm showed slow but steadygrowth until 1976, when it relocated to an old, abandonedmeat-packing warehouse on Chicago’s South Side. Withincreased space for inventory storage, the company wasable to begin offering an expanded line of auto parts. Thisincreased selection, combined with the trend towardlonger car ownership, led to an explosive growth of thebusiness. By 1998, Parts Emporium was the largest inde-pendent distributor of auto parts in the North Centralregion.

In 2000, Parts Emporium relocated in a sparkling newoffice and warehouse complex off Interstate 55 in subur-ban Chicago. The warehouse space alone occupied morethan 100,000 square feet. Although only a handful of newproducts have been added since the warehouse was con-structed, its utilization has increased from 65 percent tomore than 90 percent of capacity. During this same period,however, sales growth has stagnated. These conditionsmotivated Block and Spriggs to hire the first manager fromoutside the company in the firm’s history.

Sue McCaskey knows that although her influence toinitiate changes will be limited, she must produce positiveresults immediately. Thus, she decides to concentrate ontwo products from the extensive product line: the EG151exhaust gasket and the DB032 drive belt. If she candemonstrate significant gains from proper inventory man-agement for just two products, perhaps Block and Spriggswill give her the backing needed to change the total inven-tory management system.

The EG151 exhaust gasket is purchased from an over-seas supplier, Haipei, Inc. Actual demand for the first 21weeks of 2001 is shown in the following table:

WEEK ACTUAL DEMAND WEEK ACTUAL DEMAND

1 104 12 972 103 13 993 107 14 1024 105 15 995 102 16 1036 102 17 1017 101 18 1018 104 19 1049 100 20 108

10 100 21 9711 103

A quick review of past orders, shown in another docu-ment, indicates that a lot size of 150 units is being usedand that the lead time from Haipei is fairly constant at twoweeks. Currently, at the end of week 21, no inventory is onhand; 11 units are backordered, and there is a scheduledreceipt of 150 units.

The DB032 drive belt is purchased from the BendoxCorporation of Grand Rapids, Michigan. Actual demandso far in 2001 is shown in the following table:

WEEK ACTUAL DEMAND WEEK ACTUAL DEMAND

11 18 17 5012 33 18 5313 53 19 5414 54 20 4915 51 21 5216 53

Because this product is new, data are available only sinceits introduction in week 11. Currently, 324 units are onhand; there are no backorders and no scheduled receipts.A lot size of 1,000 units is being used, with the lead timefairly constant at three weeks.

CASE PARTS EMPORIUM

continued

41747_ch10case01 5/3/02 2:31 PM Page 1

Page 2: Parts Emporium Case Study.pdf

The wholesale prices that Parts Emporium charges itscustomers are $12.99 for the EG151 exhaust gasket and$8.89 for the DB032 drive belt. Because no quantity dis-counts are offered on these two highly profitable items,gross margins based on current purchasing practices are32 percent of the wholesale price for the exhaust gasketand 48 percent of the wholesale price for the drive belt.

Parts Emporium estimates its cost to hold inventory at21 percent of its inventory investment. This percent recog-nizes the opportunity cost of tying money up in inventoryand the variable costs of taxes, insurance, and shrinkage.The annual report notes other warehousing expendituresfor utilities and maintenance and debt service on the100,000-square-foot warehouse, which was built for $1.5million. However, McCaskey reasons that these warehous-ing costs can be ignored because they will not change forthe range of inventory policies that she is considering.

Out-of-pocket costs for Parts Emporium to place anorder with suppliers are estimated to be $20 per order forexhaust gaskets and $10 per order for drive belts. On theoutbound side, there can be delivery charges. Although

most customers pick up their parts at Parts Emporium,some orders are delivered to customers. To provide thisservice, Parts Emporium contracts with a local companyfor a flat fee of $21.40 per order, which is added to thecustomer’s bill. McCaskey is unsure whether to increasethe ordering costs for Parts Emporium to include deliverycharges.

Questions

1. Put yourself in Sue McCaskey’s position and prepare adetailed report to Dan Block and Ed Spriggs on manag-ing the inventory of the EG151 exhaust gasket and theDB032 drive belt. Be sure to present a proper inventorysystem and recognize all relevant costs.

2. By how much do your recommendations for these twoitems reduce annual cycle inventory, stockout, andordering costs?

Source: This case was provided by Professor Robert Bregman, Universityof Houston.

continued

41747_ch10case01 5/3/02 2:31 PM Page 2