39
Design of Patient-Centered Care Health IT Patient Advisor involvement in ePHR Design and Outcomes Research Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc. Director, Center for Patient- and Family-Centered Care, Medical College of Georgia AHRQ’s 2008 Annual Conference Promoting Quality – Partnering for Change September 7 – 10, 2008 Bethesda, MD www.CPFCC.org

Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

  • Upload
    nitara

  • View
    33

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Design of Patient-Centered Care Health IT Patient Advisor involvement in ePHR Design and Outcomes Research. Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc. Director, Center for Patient- and Family-Centered Care, Medical College of Georgia. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

Design of Patient-Centered Care Health IT

Patient Advisor involvement in ePHR Design and Outcomes Research

Patricia Sodomka, FACHESenior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health,

Inc.Director, Center for Patient- and Family-Centered Care, Medical College of

GeorgiaAHRQ’s 2008 Annual Conference

Promoting Quality – Partnering for ChangeSeptember 7 – 10, 2008

Bethesda, MD

www.CPFCC.org

Page 2: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Goals for this Presentation

Overview of ePHR Design Development and Outcomes Research Project

Impact of Patient and Patient Advisor Involvement in e-PHR Research Project

Findings to date

“This project was supported by grant number R18HS017234 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.”

Page 3: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Who We Are Health Sciences University for the 34 unit University System

of Georgia founded 1828 5 Schools (Medicine, Allied Health, Nursing, Dentistry,

Graduate Studies) Tertiary Academic Medical Center

• 632 bed facility includes Adult and Children’s hospitals, Ambulatory Care Center, Radiation Therapy Center

• 110 specialty clinics – Georgia and South Carolina• Network of 7 critical access and rural hospital affiliates

21,000 Admissions 508,000 Ambulatory Care Visits

Page 4: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Georgia

AHA CEO Toolkit

Remaking American Medicine

Page 5: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 6: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

“Using an Electronic Personal Health Record to Empower Patients with Hypertension”

Examine the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of an ePHR in a population of

ambulatory patients with hypertension.

“Overall Project Goal”

www.CPFCC.org

Page 7: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 8: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

The Essential Role of the Patient Advisor

Christine AbbottLead Patient Advisor –

ePHR Study

Page 9: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Impact of Patients and Patient Advisors in Research Project on:

Research Methods

Design of PHR

Dialogue with Physicians

Page 10: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Project Aims

Incorporate PFCC into the ePHR Test the effectiveness of the ePHR

in hypertensive patients Measure the impact on system

adoption of PFCC

Page 11: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

The Role That ePHR’s Can Play

Offer the opportunity for patient’s to accumulate and manage their own information, track goals, track progress toward goals, manage meds, coordinate care

Transparency and access to information important features — link to the clinical information system strengthens benefits

Page 12: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Aim 1Modifying our ePHR: My HealthLink

Modifications based on MS study

Modifications based on WAVE 1 and National Advisory input

Final modifications based on WAVE 2

WAVE 1 data collection

National Advisory input

WAVE 2 data collection

Main Trial

Page 13: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Aim 2:The Trial

20 physicians

10 Internal Medicine 10 Family Medicine

5 ePHR 5 care as usual

180 Control patients (36 per physician)

180 Intervention patients

(36 per physician)

5 ePHR 5 care as usual

180 InterventionPatients

(36 per physician)

180 control patients(36 per physician)

Page 14: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Outcome Measures

4 visits—every 3 months Biological measures

BP, BMI, waist circumference Fasting glucose, triglycerides, HDL, LCL

Patient empowerment measures Patient activation (PAM) Patient assessment of chronic illness care Consumer assessment of healthcare

providers and systems

Page 15: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Outcome Measures

Patient/Physician Collaboration Measures Audiotapes of 100 intervention and 100

control visits at initial and 3-month visit• Content of communication• Taxonomy of requests from patients

Patient Utilization Measures Self-reported utilization Electronic abstraction

Adherence to Practice Guidelines Chart review

Page 16: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Initial FindingsWave 1 of Aim 1

• 15 patients, 9 interviewed

• Themes developed through iterative process User Themes Themes about general ePHR issues Technology Themes

Page 17: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

ePHR Aim 1 – Wave 1 - Categorized Themes

ePHR User Themes

Technology Themes

System Themes#5

Understanding

#7Patient

Familiarity &Training

#10

Patient Expectations

Practice Patient Doctor

#1

Advantages

#2

Disadvantages

#3

Navigation /Movement

#4

Linkages External

Within

#6

Contacts / Corrections / Suggestions

#8

Additional Tracking

#9

Diary Functionability

#11

Medications

#12

Access to ePHR

Medical Terminology

Jargon

Internet

User-Friendly

A lot of information to learn

Activation

UpkeepInitial Data Entry

Facilitate partnership to manage medical

problems

Overwhelming

Time Consuming

TrackingData

Increase efficiency of visit

Thorough Specific

Facilitates communication w/DR & Nurse

Organizes medical records

Improve Instructions

Improve Usability

Ability to personalize

User Interface

Terminology

Personalize user features

Logistics

Access

Care Providers

Interoperability

Personalized Physical Measurements (ie. Diet, exercise, immunizations, etc.)

#13

Cost

Saves money

through fewer

visits

Page 18: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Initial FindingsWave 1 of Aim 1

7 technology themes identified 40 specific suggestions Rank ordered suggestions by

importance and feasibility through collaborative process including patients

Page 19: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Initial FindingsWave 1 of Aim 1

Technology themes included: Navigation issues Linkages within and external to PHR Content corrections Health tracking Diary functionality Expanded medication coverage Access to PHR data

Page 20: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Implementation of Patient Suggestions

Wave 2 8

Main Trial 8

Future 1

Patient Training 4

Ranked Zero 11

Not technically feasible 7

Policy issue 1

Page 21: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

National Sample QuotesHypertension Patient Panel

“And he talks to me differently because he knows I can click on something and I know about it.”

www.CPFCC.org

Page 22: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

National Sample QuotesHypertension Patient Panel

“We don’t waste a lot of time on history, on how have you been, what have you done? It’s more we had goals and where are you at now with that? How’s this working out? I feel like my 15 minutes is fully packed. Whereas before 10 of it is spent trying to get where we needed to be.”

www.CPFCC.org

Page 23: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

National Sample QuotesHypertension Patient Panel

“In the past, if my labs were off, my primary would call and say I needed to make an appointment…we need to talk. But now, I can see if I need to make a goal before I see him. It makes for a better more productive visit.”

www.CPFCC.org

Page 24: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Using Patient Advisors in Research

• Not as subjects, as advisors

• Different language, different values

• Especially when designing patient systems

• Patient perspectives are different than what clinicians, IT workers, or researchers think

• Clarity increases

Page 25: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

APPENDIX

Page 26: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

My HealthLink

Page 27: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 28: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 29: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 30: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 31: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 32: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 33: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 34: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 35: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 36: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 37: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 38: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org

Page 39: Patricia Sodomka, FACHE Senior Vice President, Patient- and Family-Centered Care, MCG Health, Inc

www.CPFCC.org