Paul Jc Rut Zen Anthropocene

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 5/27/2018 Paul Jc Rut Zen Anthropocene

    1/2S 1 0 | N A T U R E | V O L 4 6 7 | 1 4 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 0

    How important is an interdisciplinary approach

    in addressing urgent scientific questions, and

    how can we foster such collaborations?

    Interdisciplinary research has always played amajor role in my career. In my earliest papersI proposed that NO and NO2could act as cata-lysts to destroy ozone in the stratosphere orto produce ozone in the troposphere, yet I

    had no formal edu-cation in chemistry.In fact, I was trained

    as civil engineer; Ishifted to working asa computer special-ist at the Universityof Stockholm torun meteorologicalmodels and, whilehelping to developa p r o g r a m f o rclassical

    ozone chemistry, got hooked onatmospheric chemistry. I wrote theNOx papers when I was 36 yearsold.

    Are scientists under-represented in

    politics? And do established scientists,

    especially Nobel laureates, have a

    duty to become active in politics and

    science policy?

    There is, in fact, a dearth of scientistsand scientifically educated represent-atives in politics, which is a worth-while subject for analysis. I am onlyaware of three national leaders whohave had scientific backgrounds:Margaret Thatcher, Angela Merkeland Gro Harlem Brundtland of Nor-way; interestingly, all women.

    I dont think that Nobel laure-ates have a special duty to becomemore active in politics, except if theirresearch could lead to problemsfor society. In the first place, theyshould remain scientists. However,the general public expects Nobeliststo have an above average interest insocial issues and the increased par-ticipation of scientists here shouldbe applauded, as is the case underPresident Obama.

    To establish closer contactbetween politicians and scientists,the German parliament has created

    Anthropocene manPaul J. Crutzen

    Paul J. Crutzen shared the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1995 with Mario J. Molina andF. Sherwood Rowland for their work on formation and decomposition of ozone.

    PROFILE

    lScientific Member, Max Planck Institute

    for Chemistry, Department for Atmospheric

    Chemistry (since 1980)

    lBorn in Amsterdam on 3December 1933

    lSurvived the Dutch hongerwinter of

    19441945

    lMarried Terttu Soininen in February,

    1958. The couple has two daughterslMoved to Stockholm in July 1959 to

    work as computer programmer in the

    Department of Meteorology of Stockholm

    Hgskola (later Stockholm University)

    lPreviously director of research at the

    National Center of Atmospheric Research

    (NCAR) in Boulder, Colorado (19771980)

    After myfirst researchsuccesses I livedin a constant fearof running out of

    problems to workon: it would havebeen terrible

    for a well-funded researchdirector.

    commissions consisting of equal numbers ofpoliticians and scientists to study and high-light problems of general importance, such asclimate change and stratospheric ozone deple-tion. The advice of these commissions has beenvery successful in the political process.

    How can the public be convinced of the

    importance of fundamental research with no

    applications in sight?

    By pointing to the examples of great scientists

    like Einstein, Newton, Darwin, Faraday andothers. In my own, much more modest, case,when I wrote the article about the potentialeffects of NOx on ozone, I had not the slight-est idea about its relevance.

    Things changed in the fall of 1970 whenI read a report of a major international con-ference in the US, which mentioned NOxemissions but denied their importance.

    Independently, Harold Johnston and I drewattention to the problem of NOx emissionsfrom super sonic aircraft destroying strat-ospheric ozone. The same happened in the case

    of chlorofluorocarbon emissions:the societalrelevance was initially not recognized.

    You must have experienced a lull at some point

    in your research career. What kept you going?

    After my first research successes I lived ina constant fear of running out of problemsto work on: it would have been terrible for awell-funded research director. That did not

    happen. The main reason is that myresearch field is highly multi-facetedand interdisciplinary. There is roomfor many projects.

    What advice would you give all young

    researchers who are starting their

    research life so as to become a good

    scientist?

    Stay away from big science in whichthe resulting papers have manyauthors. And choose a professorwho gives you a lot of freedom. I waslucky to find Bert Bolin.

    Aside from as a Nobel laureate, how

    do you want to be remembered?

    As the person, who significantlyincreased knowledge about the processesthat determine the distribution of ozonein the atmosphere.

    And as the scientist whocoined the term Anthropocene:A new geologic epoch dominatedby human activities, actually firstpublished inNature.

    And as one of the scientists whodrew attention to the potentiallydevastating climatic consequencesof a nuclear war, the so-callednuclear winter. More people woulddie of the indirect consequences ofmass starvation and disease thanwould be killed by the nuclearbombs.

    SCIENCE MASTERCLASSOUTLOOK

  • 5/27/2018 Paul Jc Rut Zen Anthropocene

    2/2