Upload
ngocong
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Slide 1
On Nanoparticles’ Tribology;
Reducing the Real Area of
Contact to Reduce Friction and
Control Wear
Hamed Ghaednia PhD Candidate
Dr. Robert Jackson Associate Professor
Multi-Scale Tribology Laboratory
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Samuel Ginn College of Engineering
Auburn University
Slide 2
Agenda
• Introduction
• Motivations and Challenges
• Experimental investigations
• Nanoparticle Contact Model
• Nanoparticles in Dry Contact
• Conclusion
Slide 3
Introduction
Nano-Technology Nanotechnology is the understanding and control of matter at dimensions of roughly 1 to 100 nanometers, where unique phenomena enable novel applications. Encompassing nanoscale science, engineering and technology, nanotechnology involves imaging, measuring, modeling, and manipulating matter at this length scale. US National Nanotechnology Initiative
Nanotechnology-based consumer products inventory (as of March 10, 2011).
http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer
There is a small set of materials explicitly referenced in nanotechnology consumer products.
Silver (313 products) Carbon(91) Titanium (and titanium dioxide) (59) Silica (43) Zinc (and oxide) (31) Gold (28).
Slide 4
Introduction
Nano-Lubricants •Nanoparticles are metallic or non-metallic particle smaller than 100 nm (1 nm = 10-9 m)
•Nanoparticles are clusters/arrangements of atom/molecules and not individual ones.
•Particle additives are historically known as "Solid Lubricant Additives”
•Components of a nano-lubricant
Main Lubricant
Dispersant agent
Nanoparticles
http://angiebiotech.com/
Slide 5
Introduction
Why nanoparticles as lubricant additives?
• Small enough to penetrate contact
• Scale dependent properties
• Versatility of characteristics
• Numerous combinations
Challenges and Disadvantages
• Stability of the suspensions
• Reclamation of particles
• Environmental issues
• Often expensive
• Unknown Mechanisms
Nowak, Mook, Minor, Gerberich, Carter, 2007
Slide 6
Motivation for Nanoparticle Lubrication
Vehicle Industry for Example…
• Reducing engine friction will improve fuel economy.
• 20% to 30% of the energy produced by a modern combustion engine is lost to friction.
• The DOE finds that merely a 5% reduction of engine energy losses would cut the consumption of oil by approximately 100 million barrels.
• This approach could allow for improved friction in not only new vehicles but vehicles currently on the road.
Holmberg, K., Andersson, P., and Erdemir, A., 2012, "Global Energy Consumption Due to
Friction in Passenger Cars," Tribology International, 47(0), pp. 221-234.
Slide 7
Experimental investigations of nanoparticle lubricants
Slide 8
• Proposed nanoparticle lubrication enhancement mechanisms:
(1) the particles affect viscosity
(2) the particles affect the thermal properties and thermal stability
(3) the particles could roll between the surfaces as “nano ball bearings”
(4) the particles could mend worn surfaces by adhering to them, “Transfer Films”.
(5) Particle could reduce the real area of contact
2. Rolling
1. Transfer films
3. Reducing the real area of contact
What to look for?
Tao, Jiazheng, Kang (1996) and Liu et al. (2004)
Slide 9
• Base lubricants
- Mineral 600HC Heavy Base Oils
- Mineral 100HC light Base Oils
• Nano Particles
Copper Oxide Particles of size 5 - 15 nm.
Sodium Oleate as surfactant.
CuO Nano-Lubricant
Clary, D. R., and Mills, G., 2011, "Preparation and Thermal Properties of Cuo
Particles," The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
100HC
50% vol
600HC
50% Vol
Base oil
Dodecane
10.0 % wt
CuO/SOA
particles
Slide 10
Friction Results
Normal Load: 0.0 N ~ 450 N
Rotational Speed: 570 rpm
• Nanoparticles appear to be more influential
farther into boundary lubrication regime
Friction Results
Slide 11
Ball
Disk
Stylus tip
Stylus Profilometry
Slide 12
(b)
(c)
Surfaces Analysis
(a) Surface tested with control
EDX Analysis SEM Analysis
Slide 13
Surfaces Analysis
Surface tested with 1.0%wt
nano-lubricant
EDX Analysis
SEM Analysis Distribution of Cu
Slide 14
Wear Analysis
Slide 15
Silver Nano-lubricant
polyethylene glycol (PEG)
MW of 600 g/mol
Nano-Lubricant
Nanoparticle
Surfactant/
Coating Agent
Lubricant
polyvinyl pyrollidone (PVP)
MW of 10K g/mol
metallic silver particles
Average size 7 nm
0.75 – 4.5 mM Ag
1.5 mM PVP
Remaining is PEG
Stable for 6 months
Control lubricant
1.5 mM PVP
Remaining is
PEG
100 nm
Slide 16
Friction and Wear Tests
Pin-On-Disk Friction test
• 10 mm sphere
• AISI 52100 chromium steel
• Rotating disk
• AISI 1080 carbon steel
• Submerged samples
• Contact suspension
• Feedback controlled normal force
• ECR sensor to detect contact
• The setup is capable of conducting carefully controlled experiments
Slide 17
Wear Analysis
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
0.055
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0 1 2 3 4 5
Wea
r V
olu
me
(mm
3)
CO
F
Particle Concentration (mM)
COF Wear
• Wear was measured using the
profilometry method.
• Each test was repeated three times.
• Friction decreases monotonically
versus particle concentration.
• Ag particles reduce wear as well.
Slide 18
Discussion on Enhancing Mechanism
Transfer Films
Rolling
Reducing contact area
• CuO/SOA and Ag Nanoparticles added to base oil as an additive in the absence of any other additives.
• Friction coefficient decrease as the nanoparticles concentration increases.
•Wear volume has a maximum value for CuO nanoparticle weight fraction of 1% and a minimum value for 2%wt.
•Wear volume decreases versus nanoparticle concentration for softer Ag nanoparticles.
• Surface analyses and wear measurement results are consistent with nanoparticles reducing the real area of contact.
• The mechanism of reduction in the real area of contact needs further investigation and study to be fully proven.
Slide 19
Analytical multi-scale contact model for nano-lubricants
Slide 20
Overview of the Model
Model nanoparticle in contact between rough surfaces
• Assumptions - Nanoparticle are suspended in a stable colloidal suspension.
- Particles are distributed over a range of size.
- Both particles and the surface are deformable
- Other assumptions discussed later
• Goals
- Model should include scale dependent properties of particles.
- Model should consider different weight fractions of nano-lubricants.
- Model should investigate the effect of particles on the contact mechanics.
Slide 21
Proposed Multi-Scale methodology
- Multi-scale rough surface contact model
Handles the rough surface and micron size features of the surface
Models the asperities in contact
Average contact pressure and surfaces area of contact is modeled
- Statistical particle model to handle the nanoparticle deformation and size dependent properties
Models the effect of particles inside the rough surface contact region
Particles engage in the contact and alter rough surface area contact and contact force
Stack two models to account for different scales
• Classic friction and abrasive wear models are used to link the contact
mechanics data to the experimental data.
Slide 22
Predicting Friction and Wear
Friction and Wear Model
Friction coefficient directly relates to the real Area of contact
- Possible mechanism verified: Area decreases as particles
engage inside the contact region and reduce the area of
contact.
- This also explains why softer particle can reduce friction and
wear simultaneously.
Experiments- CuO particles
F
AA sppsrs
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8x 10
-6
Wo
rn V
olu
me
/ S
lid
ing
dis
tan
ce [
m2]
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
0.1
0.11
Volume PercentC
OF
Particle Induced Wear
Coefficient of Friction
Nanoparticle Contact Model- Si particles
Rq = 0.05 um
Slide 23
Nanoparticle in Dry Contact
Slide 24
• The proposed mechanism suggests that the nanoparticles ONLY, could effectively alter contact behavior.
• What is the role of nanoparticles compared to the lubricant’s in the boundary lubrication regime?
• The CuO/SOA nanoparticle can be dispersed in Chloroform. Chloroform is highly volatile with a boiling point of 61 oC.
• The solution is applied on a disk with a syringe and chloroform is evaporated under a heating lamp leaving a coating of nanoparticles on the disk.
Heating Lamp
Pour CuO- Chloroform
solution on the disk
Let the sample dry under
heating lamp
Disk coated with
CuO particles Original disk
Nanoparticle Dry Friction Tests
Slide 25
Dry Nanoparticle Test Results
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Time (s)
CO
F
Dry Friction Test
Nanoparticle Dry Friction Test
Nano-Lubricant Friction Test
Lubricated Friction Test
Dry Friction Test
Lubricated Friction Test
Nanoparticle Dry Friction Tests
Nano-Lubricant Test
Nanoparticle Dry Test
The results not only prove that dry nanoparticles can reduce friction but also suggests that they can be very effective.
This is a work in progress…
Slide 26
Conclusions
•Nano-materials and nano-technology are offering new solutions in a wide verity of topics and currently finding their way to consumer products.
•Nanoparticle additives are one example. Nanoparticles can infiltrate the small gaps between surfaces in contact and alter friction and wear.
•Experimental investigations explored the effect of CuO and Ag nanoparticles on friction and wear. Surface analysis and electron microscopy were used to shed light on particle/surface interaction. Results were consistent with nanoparticles reducing the real area of contact.
•A model for contact between rough surfaces separated by nano-lubricants is developed. The reduction of the real area of contact is further verified as an important mechanism governing the contact mechanics of nano-lubricants
•Dry nanoparticle friction tests revealed promising potential for nanoparticles to be used as dry coatings to reduce friction.
Slide 27
Previous Industrial Collaborations at the Auburn Tribology Lab:
• Development and Application of Multi-scale Friction
Prediction Methods to Dynamic Actuator Systems, Siemens
AG
• A Study of Various Material Combinations on the Bolted
Contacts of Busbars, John Deere
• Feasibility Test of Solvay Bearings for Baking Applications,
Solvay Advanced Polymers
• Theoretical and Experimental Investigation on Fretting
Corrosion and Thermal Degradation for a High Power
Connector, LS Cable
Slide 28
• Acknowledgment
Appreciation is expressed to Mr. Mohammad Sharif and Dr. German Mills of Auburn University chemistry department for providing the colloids; Dr. Michael Bozack and Dr. Mike Miller of Auburn University for providing support and assistance with the surface analyses.
This material is based upon work supported by the US Department of Energy under Award Number DE-SC0002470.
• Thanks