PE2098-PHI-II.ESA-REP.01 - 5341 Boundary Road

GeotechnicalEngineering

EnvironmentalEngineering

Hydrogeology

GeologicalEngineering

Materials Testing

Building Science

Paterson Group Inc.Consulting Engineers28 Concourse Gate - Unit 1Ottawa (Nepean), OntarioCanada K2E 7T7

Tel: (613) 226-7381Fax: (613) 226-6344www.patersongroup.ca

patersongroup

Modified Phase I - Environmental Site Assessment5341 Boundary Road

Ottawa, Ontario

Prepared For

The Properties Group Management Ltd.

September 27, 2010

Report: PE2098-1

patersonOttawa Kingston North Bay


Ottawa, Ontario

Report: PE2098-1September 27, 2010 Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2.0 SITE INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

3.0 SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

4.0 METHOD OF INVESTIGATION

4.1 Historical Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

4.2 Field Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5.0 FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

5.1 Historical Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

5.2 Exterior Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

5.3 Adjacent Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

5.4 Subsurface Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

6.0 ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION

6.1 Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

6.2 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

7.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

APPENDICES

Appendix 1 Soil Profile and Test Data Sheets

Symbols and Terms

Analytical Test Results

Appendix 2 Aerial Photographs

Figure 1 - Key Plan

Drawing PE2098-1 - Site Plan



Ottawa, Ontario

Report: PE2098-1September 27, 2010 Page ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Assessment

Phase I - Environmental Site Assessment

The purpose of the Phase I-ESA was to research the past and current uses of the subject

property and neighbouring sites to identify environmental concerns with the potential to impact

the subject site.

Based on the site observations, potential environmental concerns were identified with the

presence of fill material on the subject property and with a gasoline service station to the west

of the site. A subsurface investigation was recommended and conducted to address the

above noted concern.

Subsurface Investigation

A subsurface investigation was conducted for the subject site to investigate the quality of the

fill material present on the subject property and to determine if the site had been impacted by

the gasoline service station to the west of Boundary Road.

Visual and/or olfactory observations did not indicate the presence of contamination or

deleterious fill material in any of the soil samples from the test pits. The Gastech vapour

readings were found to range from 0 to 15 ppm. These readings are considered to be

representative of background conditions.

Soil

Five (5) soil samples were submitted for petroleum hydrocarbon (PHCs), benzene, toluene,

ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) or metals analysis. All of the test results are in compliance

with the selected MOE Table 2 standards. The analytical test results also meet the impending

2009 MOE Standards.

Conclusion

The intent of the subsurface investigation has been to determine whether the subject site has

been significantly impacted by the presence of fill material on the subject property or by the

gasoline service station to the west of Boundary Road, further west of the site. Based on our

field observations and analytical test results, in our opinion, the subject property has not been

significantly impacted. In our opinion, no further investigation is required at this time.



Ottawa, Ontario

Report: PE2098-1September 27, 2010 Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

At the request of Simplicity Developments, Paterson Group conducted a Modified

Phase I - Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the property at 5341 Boundary

Road, in the City of Ottawa, Ontario. For the purposes of this report, the north portion

of the property at 5329 Boundary Road, which is to be severed and transferred to the

subject property and the portion of the property at 5341 Boundary Road which is to be

severed and transferred to the property at 5329 Boundary Road are included in the

lands defined by the site.

This report has been prepared specifically and solely for the above noted project which

is described herein. It contains all of our findings and results of the environmental

conditions at this site.

2.0 SITE INFORMATION

Address: 5341 Boundary Road, Ottawa, Ontario.

Location: Located southeast of the intersection of Boundary Road

and Highway 417, in the City of Ottawa, Ontario. Refer to

Figure 1 - Key Plan in Appendix 2 for the site location.

Latitude and Longitude: 45° 20' 50" N, 75° 26' 23" W

Site Description:

Configuration: Irregular.

Area: 22.4 Hectares (approximate).

Zoning: RH - Rural Heavy Industrial Zone.

Current Use: The majority of the subject site is vacant land. A Rogers

telecommunications tower is present on the central portion

of the site, near the south property boundary.

Services: The subject site is located in a privately serviced area.



Ottawa, Ontario


3.0 SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of work for this Modified Phase I - Environmental Site Assessment was as

follows:

‘ Investigate the existing conditions present at the subject property by carrying out

a field study and historical review in accordance with CSA Z768-01.

‘ Conduct a subsurface investigation, to assess the quality of the fill material on

the subject site and from the presence of a retail fuel outlet to the southwest of

the site.

‘ Present the results of our findings in a comprehensive report.

‘ Provide a preliminary environmental site evaluation based on our findings.

‘ Provide preliminary remediation recommendations and further investigative work

if contamination is encountered or suspected.



Ottawa, Ontario


4.0 PHASE I - ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

4.1 Historical Research

The methodology for the Phase I - Environmental Site Assessment program was

carried out in two segments. The first consisted of a historical review which included

a brief research of the past use of the site. This portion of the program was carried out

by Paterson personnel from the Environmental Division. The following is a list of the

key information sources reviewed by our firm.

Federal Records

‘ Air photos at the Energy Mines and Resources Air Photo Library.

‘ National Archives.

‘ Maps and photographs (Geological Survey of Canada surficial and subsurface

mapping).

‘ PCB Waste Storage Site Inventory.

Provincial Records

‘ MOE document titled “Waste Disposal Site Inventory in Ontario”.

‘ MOE Brownfields Environmental Site Registry.

‘ Office of Technical Standards and Safety Authority, Fuels Safety Branch.

Municipal Records

‘ The Corporation of the City of Ottawa.

‘ City of Ottawa document entitled “Old Landfill Management Strategy; Phase 1 -

Identification of Sites, City of Ottawa, Ontario”; finalised October 2004.

Local Information Sources

‘ Other Environmental Reports.



Ottawa, Ontario


4.2 Field Assessment

The second segment of the Phase I - ESA consisted of a site visit which included a

cursory assessment of the environmental conditions of the subject property. The field

assessment was carried out on September 13, 2010 by personnel from the

Environmental Division.

As part of the field assessment, the site was inspected for signs of the following:

‘ Evidence of previous or existing fuel storage tanks.

‘ On-site use or storage of hazardous materials.

‘ On-site handling or disposal of liquid or solid waste materials.

‘ Above-ground piping systems, including pumps, valves and joints.

‘ Truck or rail loading or unloading areas.

‘ Electrical conduits, abandoned pipelines or pumping stations.

‘ Remnants of old buildings.

‘ Signs of surficial contamination (ie. staining, distressed vegetation).

‘ Unnaturally discoloured, ponded or flowing waters.

‘ Surficial drainage, wetlands, natural waterways or watercourses through the

properties (i.e. ditches, creeks, ponds, poor drainage).

‘ Any evidence of potable water supply wells or groundwater monitoring wells (such

as leak detection monitoring wells for underground storage tank systems, or

abandoned systems).

‘ Any abnormal odours associated with the site, whether from on-site or off-site

sources.

‘ The presence of any recent soil disturbances such as soil removal, filling, tilling,

grading, etc.

‘ Asbestos containing materials (ACMs).

‘ Urea formaldehyde foam insulation (UFFI).

‘ PCB containing products.

‘ Ozone depleting substances (ODS).

‘ Lead-containing materials.

‘ Current use of neighbouring properties.



Ottawa, Ontario


5.0 FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

5.1 Historical Review

Air Photo Research

Historical air photos, from the national air photo library, were reviewed for the subject

property and adjacent sites. A summary of our findings is presented below.

1945 The subject site and neighbouring properties appear to be vacant or used

for agricultural purposes. Several farmsteads are present further to the

south and west of the site. Boundary Road is present to the west of the

site.

1969 No significant changes have been made to the subject site or

neighbouring properties.

1975 Highway 417 has been constructed to the north of the site. No other

significant changes have been made to the subject site or neighbouring

properties.

1986 No significant changes were made to the subject site or use of the

neighbouring properties. The northern portion of the subject site and the

adjacent land to the north are not covered in this aerial photograph.

1993 Some soil disturbance appears to have occurred on the west portion of

the site. The present day gasoline service station appears to be present

to the west of Boundary Road, further west of the site. What appears to

be the present day equipment rental yard is present further south of the

site. No other significant changes were made to the subject site or use

of the neighbouring properties.

2002 (City of Ottawa website) Further soil disturbance (suspected excavation)

appears to have occurred on the west portion of the subject site. What

appears to be a radio tower is present near the centre of the site. An

access roadway has been constructed from Boundary Road to the radio

tower on the south portion of the site. No other significant changes were

made to the subject site or use of the neighbouring properties.



Ottawa, Ontario


2005 (City of Ottawa website) Further excavation appears to have occurred on

the west portion of the subject site. No other significant changes were

made to the subject site or use of the neighbouring properties.

2008 (City of Ottawa website) Some filling of the excavated area on the west

portion of the site appears to have occurred. The present day auto body

shop appears to be present near the southwest portion of the site. No

other significant changes were made to the subject site or use of the

adjacent properties to the north, east and west.

Laser copies of some of the aerial photographs reviewed are included in Appendix 2.

National Archives

City directories and fire insurance plans (FIPs) are not available for the area of the

subject property.

Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN)

The Geological Survey of Canada website on the Urban Geology of the National

Capital Area was consulted as part of this assessment. Based on the information from

NRCAN, bedrock in the area of the site consists of shale of the Carlsbad Formation.

Based on the maps, the thickness of overburden ranges from 15 to 50 m and consists

of deltaic and estuarian Deposits of nearshore marine sediments on the northern

portion of the site and marine deposits of clay and silt of offshore marine sediments on

the southern portion of the property.

PCB Inventory

A search of national PCB waste storage sites was conducted. No PCB waste storage

sites are located in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.

Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE)

The Ontario Ministry of Environment document entitled “Waste Disposal Site Inventory

in Ontario, 1991" was reviewed as part of the historical research. This document

includes all recorded active and closed waste disposal sites, industrial manufactured

gas plants, and coal tar distillation plants in the Province of Ontario. No active or

closed waste disposal sites or any of the other listed sites were identified in the vicinity

of the subject site.



Ottawa, Ontario


A search of the MOE Brownfields environmental site registry was conducted

electronically on August 31, 2010. No record of site conditions (RSC) were listed in the

data base for properties in the vicinity of the subject site.

Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA)

The TSSA, Fuels Safety Branch in Toronto, was contacted on August 31, 2010 to

inquire about current and former underground storage tanks, spills and incidents for the

subject site and neighbouring properties. A response from the TSSA indicated there

are no records for the subject site. The property addressed 5336 Boundary Road,

located approximately 40 m southwest of the site, has a record of 4 active underground

tanks and an active cylinder exchange program. The property addressed 5425

Boundary Road, located approximately 200 m south of the site, has a record of three

(3) active underground tanks.

City of Ottawa Old Landfill Document

The document prepared by Golder Associates entitled “Old Landfill Management

Strategy, Phase I - Identification of Sites, City of Ottawa”, was reviewed. No former

landfills were identified in the immediate vicinity of the subject property.

Previous Engineering Reports

Paterson has conducted various environmental assessments in the vicinity of the

subject property. A review of our files did not indicate any environmental concerns with

respect to the subject land.

5.2 Exterior Assessment

The site inspection was conducted on September 13, 2010.

Site

The majority of the site was vacant at the time of the site inspection. A Rogers

telecommunications tower is present on the south portion of the site, near the

approximate longitudinal (east/west) centre. An access laneway leading from

Boundary Road to the telecommunications tower is present on the southern portion of

the site. The east portion (approximately 1/6th) of the site was gravel covered, while the

western portion of the site was covered with mature trees. An area of ponded water

surrounded by berms was present separating the east and west portions of the site.



Ottawa, Ontario


A second area of ponded water was present on either side of the access road to the

Bell Tower. The site was at grade relative to the adjacent properties. The general site

topography is flat, while the regional topography is generally flat. Site drainage

consists primarily of infiltration.

Potential Environmental Concerns

‘ Fuels and Chemical Storage

No apparent signs of underground storage tanks (USTs) or aboveground storage

tanks (ASTs) were observed at the time of the assessment. No fuels or chemicals

were observed on the exterior of the property.

‘ Waste Management

No waste is currently being produced on site.

‘ Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

No potential sources of PCBs were observed on site.

‘ Wastewater Discharges

No wastewater is currently generated or disposed of on site.

5.3 Adjacent Properties

Land use adjacent to the subject site was as follows:

‘ North - Vacant land followed by Highway 417 and Grey Hawk Golf Club;

‘ East - Vacant land followed by Highway 417;

‘ South - Residential dwelling, Alpine auto body and vacant land;

‘ West - Boundary Road followed by a gasoline service station, vacant land and

highway interchanges.

The current use of the property west of Boundary Road as a gasoline service station

and the property southwest of the site as an auto body have the potential to have

impacted the subject site. Land use adjacent to the subject site is illustrated on

Drawing No. PE2098-1 - Site Plan in Appendix 2.



Ottawa, Ontario


5.4 Subsurface Investigation

The subsurface investigation was conducted on September 13, 2010 and consisted of

the placement of 15 test pits on the subject property (TP1 to TP15). TP1 through TP9,

TP 14, and TP15 were placed to assess the fill material on the western portion of the

subject property. TP10 was placed to assess the service station west of Boundary

Road. TP12 and TP13 were placed to assess the body shop southwest of the site. TP

11 was placed closer to the centre of the site for site coverage and to determine the

native soil conditions. The test pit locations are illustrated on Drawing PE2098-1 - Site

Plan in Appendix 2. The test pits were completed with a rubber tired backhoe under

full time supervision by Paterson personnel.

The soil profile on the west portion of the site generally consists of fill underlain by

native silty clay. The fill generally consists of sandy silt with gravel, cobbles and

boulders. Trace amounts of asphalt and brick were observed in the test pits on the

west portion of the property. The soil profile on the remainder of the site consists of

topsoil over silty sand overlying native clay. Specific details of the soil profile at each

test hole location can be seen on the Soil Profile and Test Data sheets in Appendix 1.

Groundwater was observed to be infiltrating in to the test pits at depths ranging from

2.8 to 3.5 m below surface grade. No sheen or odours were observed in the

groundwater from any of the test holes.

The test pits were completed to depths ranging from 2.0 to 3.7 m below the existing

grade. A total of 29 soil samples were recovered from the test pits by means of grab

sampling. Upon recovery, all samples were immediately sealed in appropriate

containers to facilitate the preliminary screening procedure. The depths at which the

grab samples were obtained from the boreholes are shown as “ G ”, on the Soil Profile

and Test Data sheet in Appendix 1.

No unusual visual or olfactory observations were made with regard to the soil samples

obtained from the test pits, with the exception of TP1, which had a slight hydrocarbon

odour. The combustible vapour readings for most samples ranged from 0 to 15 ppm.

These readings are not considered to be representative of elevated concentrations of

volatile substances, such as gasoline.

The remediation standards for the subject property were obtained from Table 2 of the

document entitled “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part

XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act”, prepared by the Ontario Ministry of

Environment (MOE), March 9, 2004. The MOE Table 2 Standards are based on the

following considerations:



Ottawa, Ontario


‘ Course grained soil conditions.

‘ Surface soil and groundwater conditions.

‘ Potable groundwater situation.

‘ Industrial / Commercial land use.

In July of 2009, the MOE drafted amendments to the 2004 Standards which are

scheduled to be implemented on July 1, 2011. The test results were compared to the

impending 2009 MOE Standards and are discussed following each parameter set.

Soil Analysis

Five (5) soil samples were submitted for petroleum hydrocarbon (PHCs), benzene,

toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) or metals analysis. The results of the

analytical testing and the selected remediation criteria are presented in Tables 1 and

2. The laboratory reports are included in Appendix 1.

Table 1

Analytical Test Results - Soil

BTEX and PHCs (Fractions 1 to 4)

ParameterMDL

(ug/g)

Soil Sample (ug/g)

September 13, 2010Table 2 Standards

Industrial / Commercial /

Community Property Use

(µg/g)TP1 - 2 TP10 - 2

Benzene 0.03 nd nd 0.24

Ethylbenzene 0.05 nd nd 0.28

Toluene 0.05 nd nd 2.1

Xylenes (Total) 0.05 nd nd 25

F1 PHCs (C6-C10) 10 nd nd 230

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 10 nd nd 150

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 10 nd nd 1,700

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) 10 nd nd 3,300

Notes: ‘ MDL - Method Detection Limit

‘ nd - Not Detected (< MDL)

All of the PHC and BTEX concentrations were below the laboratory method detection

limits in the analysed soil samples. All of the PHC and BTEX concentrations were

below the selected MOE Table 2 standards as well as the impending 2009 MOE

standards.



Ottawa, Ontario


Table 2

Analytical Test Results - Soil

Metals

ParameterMDL

(ug/g)

Soil Samples - (ug/g)

September 13, 2010

MOE Table 2

Industrial / Commercial /

Community Property Use

(µg/g)TP3 - 1 TP9 - 1 TP15 - 1

Antimony 1 nd nd nd 40

Arsenic 1 6 3 2 40

Barium 10 114 156 139 1500

Beryllium 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 1.2

Boron (avail.) 0.5 nd nd nd 2.0

Cadmium 0.5 nd nd nd 12

Chromium 5 37 50 48 750

Chromium VI 0.4 nd nd nd 8.0

Cobalt 5 8 11 10 80

Copper 5 21 32 25 225

Lead 1 31 43 27 1000

Mercury 0.1 nd nd nd 10

Molybdenum 1 nd 1 nd 40

Nickel 5 19 31 27 150

Selenium 1 nd nd nd 10

Silver 0.3 nd nd nd 40

Thallium 1 nd nd nd 32

Vanadium 10 37 50 48 200

Zinc 20 59 82 64 600

Notes:

‘ MDL - Method Detection Limit; nd - Not Detected (< MDL)

‘ nv - No current MOE standard;

‘ Bold - exceed MOE Table 2 standards.

No metal parameters were detected in excess of the selected MOE Table 2 standards

for the soil samples analysed. The metals analytical results also met the impending

2009 MOE Table 2 standards.



Ottawa, Ontario


6.0 ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSION

6.1 Assessment


The purpose of the Phase I-ESA was to research the past and current uses of the

subject property and neighbouring sites to identify environmental concerns with the

potential to impact the subject site.

Based on the site observations, potential environmental concerns were identified with

the presence of fill material on the subject property and with a gasoline service station

to the west of the site. A subsurface investigation was recommended and conducted

to address the above noted concern.

Subsurface Investigation

A subsurface investigation was conducted for the subject site to investigate the quality

of the fill material present on the subject property and to determine if the site had been

impacted by the gasoline service station to the west of Boundary Road.

Visual and/or olfactory observations did not indicate the presence of contamination or

deleterious fill material in any of the soil samples from the test pits. The Gastech

vapour readings were found to range from 0 to 15 ppm. These readings are

considered to be representative of background conditions.

Soil

Five (5) soil samples were submitted for petroleum hydrocarbon (PHCs), benzene,

toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) or metals analysis. All of the test results

are in compliance with the selected MOE Table 2 standards. The analytical test results

also meet the impending 2009 MOE Standards.

6.2 Conclusion

The intent of the subsurface investigation has been to determine whether the subject

site has been significantly impacted by the presence of fill material on the subject

property or by the gasoline service station to the west of Boundary Road, further west

of the site. Based on our field observations and analytical test results, in our opinion,

the subject property has not been significantly impacted. In our opinion, no further

investigation is required at this time.



Ottawa, Ontario


7.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS

This Modified Phase I - Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report has been

prepared in general accordance with the agreed scope-of-work and the requirements

of CSA Z768-01. The conclusions presented herein are based on information gathered

from a limited historical review along with the field inspection and testing program. The

findings of the Phase I - ESA are based on a review of readily available geological,

historical, and regulatory information and a cursory review made at the time of the field

assessment. The historical research relies on information supplied by others, such as

local, provincial, and federal agencies and was limited within the scope-of-work, time,

and budget of the project herein.

The client should be aware that any information pertaining to soils and all test hole logs

are furnished as a matter of general information only and test hole descriptions or logs

are not to be interpreted as descriptive of conditions at locations other than those

described by the test holes themselves.

This report was prepared for the sole use of The Properties Group and Simplicity

Developments. Permission and notification from the above noted parties and this firm

will be required to release this report to any other party.

Paterson Group Inc.

Luke Lopers, BASc.

Mark D’Arcy, P.Eng

Report Distribution:

‘ The Properties Group c/o Simplicity Developments (5 copies)

‘ Paterson Group Inc. (1 copy)

luke

Luke Lopers

luke

Mark D'Arcy

luke

Mark Darcy

APPENDIX 1

SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA SHEETS

SYMBOLS AND TERMS

ANALYTICAL TEST RESULTS

RECOVERY

NUMBER

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.

HOLE NO.

SOIL PROFILE AND TEST DATA

Lower Explosive Limit %

Full Gas Resp. Methane Elim.

G

FILL: Brown silty sand withtrace clay, gravel and boulders

Brown SANDY SILT

Grey-brown SILTY CLAY

End of Test Pit

2.20

2.90

or RQD

GROUND SURFACE

3.60

G

2

1

20 40 60 80

100 200 300 400 500

Monitori

ng W

ell


TP 1

SOIL DESCRIPTION

5341 Boundary Road

BORINGS BY

28 Concourse Gate, Unit 1, Ottawa, ON K2E 7T7

Engineers

SAMPLE

(m)

DATE

DATUM

REMARKS

Gastech 1314 Rdg. (ppm)

FILE NO.

%

N VALUE

0

1

2

3

Pen. Resist. Blows/0.3m

50 mm Dia. Cone

PE2098

patersongroup

TYPE

Ottawa, Ontario

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.(m)

RECOVERY




FILL: Grey silty sand withclay, boulders

Brown SANDY SILT

- with clay by 2.8m depth

End of Test Pit

2.30

3.30

G

G

STRATA PLOT

2

NUMBER

GROUND SURFACE

HOLE NO.

20 40 60 80

or RQD

1

DATE

Monitori

ng W

ell


100 200 300 400 500

Engineers


BORINGS BY

5341 Boundary Road

TP 2

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

%

DATUM

REMARKS


Ottawa, Ontario

N VALUE

FILE NO.

0

1

2

3

TYPE

50 mm Dia. Cone


PE2098

patersongroup

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.

RECOVERY

or RQD




FILL: Silty clay with topsoiland boulders

Grey SILTY CLAY

End of Test Pit

(GW L@ 3.5m depth)

2.20

3.70

G

G

NUMBER

2

GROUND SURFACE

HOLE NO.

20 40 60 80

1

(m)

Monitori

ng W

ell


100 200 300 400 500

Engineers


BORINGS BY

5341 Boundary Road

TP 3

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

%

DATE

DATUM

REMARKS


N VALUE

FILE NO.

0

1

2

3

Ottawa, Ontario

50 mm Dia. Cone


PE2098

patersongroup

TYPE

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.(m)

RECOVERY




FILL: Silty sand with organicsand boulders, trace concrete

Grey SANDY SILT, someclay

End of Test Pit

1.50

2.80

G

G

STRATA PLOT

2

NUMBER

GROUND SURFACE

HOLE NO.

20 40 60 80

or RQD

1

DATE

Monitori

ng W

ell


100 200 300 400 500

Engineers


BORINGS BY

5341 Boundary Road

TP 4

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

%

DATUM

REMARKS


Ottawa, Ontario

N VALUE

FILE NO.

0

1

2

TYPE

50 mm Dia. Cone


PE2098

patersongroup

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.(m)

RECOVERY




FILL: Grey silty clay withsand, trace boulders and bricks

Brown SILTY SAND, traceboulders

End of Test Pit

2.50

3.50

G

G

STRATA PLOT

2

NUMBER

GROUND SURFACE

HOLE NO.

20 40 60 80

or RQD

1

DATE

Monitori

ng W

ell


100 200 300 400 500

Engineers


BORINGS BY

5341 Boundary Road

TP 5

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

%

DATUM

REMARKS


Ottawa, Ontario

N VALUE

FILE NO.

0

1

2

3

TYPE

50 mm Dia. Cone


PE2098

patersongroup

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.

RECOVERY

or RQD




FILL: Mixture of sandy silt,clay, boulders

SILTY SAND, trace boulders

End of Test Pit

(GWL @ 2.8m depth)

2.80

3.30

G

G

NUMBER

2

GROUND SURFACE

HOLE NO.

20 40 60 80

1

(m)

Monitori

ng W

ell


100 200 300 400 500

Engineers


BORINGS BY

5341 Boundary Road

TP 6

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

%

DATE

DATUM

REMARKS


N VALUE

FILE NO.

0

1

2

3

Ottawa, Ontario

50 mm Dia. Cone


PE2098

patersongroup

TYPE

RECOVERY

NUMBER

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.

HOLE NO.




G

FILL: Sand with boulders,trace brick

FILL: Grey silty clay, traceasphalt, organics and boulders

Brown SAND

End of Test Pit

1.10

3.50

or RQD

GROUND SURFACE

3.70

G

2

1

20 40 60 80

100 200 300 400 500

Monitori

ng W

ell


TP 7

SOIL DESCRIPTION

5341 Boundary Road

BORINGS BY


Engineers

SAMPLE

(m)

DATE

DATUM

REMARKS


FILE NO.

%

N VALUE

0

1

2

3


50 mm Dia. Cone

PE2098

patersongroup

TYPE

Ottawa, Ontario

RECOVERY

NUMBER

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.

HOLE NO.




G

FILL: Brown sandy silt, someboulders, brick and concrete

Brown SAND

Grey SILTY CLAY

End of Test Pit

2.00

2.40

or RQD

GROUND SURFACE

2.90

G

2

1

20 40 60 80

100 200 300 400 500

Monitori

ng W

ell


TP 8

SOIL DESCRIPTION

5341 Boundary Road

BORINGS BY


Engineers

SAMPLE

(m)

DATE

DATUM

REMARKS


FILE NO.

%

N VALUE

0

1

2


50 mm Dia. Cone

PE2098

patersongroup

TYPE

Ottawa, Ontario

RECOVERY

NUMBER

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.

HOLE NO.




G

FILL: Silty sand, trace brickand boulders

Brown SILTY SAND

Grey SILTY CLAY

End of Test Pit

2.50

2.80

or RQD

GROUND SURFACE

3.10

G

2

1

20 40 60 80

100 200 300 400 500

Monitori

ng W

ell


TP 9

SOIL DESCRIPTION

5341 Boundary Road

BORINGS BY


Engineers

SAMPLE

(m)

DATE

DATUM

REMARKS


FILE NO.

%

N VALUE

0

1

2

3


50 mm Dia. Cone

PE2098

patersongroup

TYPE

Ottawa, Ontario

Full Gas Resp.

(m)ELEV.

Consulting


Constr

uction

Methane Elim.

(m)

DATUM


FILL: Brown sandy silt withorganics, boulders, brick andasphalt

Grey-brown SAND

Grey SILTY CLAY

End of Test Pit

1.60

2.00

DEPTH

REMARKS

GROUND SURFACE

HOLE NO.

20 40 60 80

or RQD

RECOVERY

NUMBER

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10Backhoe

2.50

DATE

Monitori

ng W

ell

Phase I - Environmental Site AssessmentEngineers


BORINGS BY

5341 Boundary Road

TP10

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

patersongroup


%

TYPE

100 200 300 400 500

FILE NO.

Ottawa, Ontario

0

1

2

PE2098

N VALUE

50 mm Dia. Cone


RECOVERY

NUMBER

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10Backhoe

Constr

uction

Consulting

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.

HOLE NO.




G

TOPSOIL

Brown SILTY SAND

Grey SILTY CLAY

End of Test Pit

0.30

1.50

or RQD

GROUND SURFACE

2.10

G

2

1

20 40 60 80

100 200 300 400 500

Monitori

ng W

ell


TP11

SOIL DESCRIPTION

5341 Boundary Road

BORINGS BY


Engineers

SAMPLE

(m)

DATE

DATUM

REMARKS


FILE NO.

%

N VALUE

0

1

2


50 mm Dia. Cone

PE2098

patersongroup

TYPE

Ottawa, Ontario

Full Gas Resp.

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.

REMARKS


Backhoe

Methane Elim.

DATE


Water

Grey SILTY CLAY, TRACESAND

End of Test Pit

0.30

2.00

G 1

Consulting

Constr

uction

GROUND SURFACE

HOLE NO.

20 40 60 80

or RQD

RECOVERY

NUMBER

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10

DATUM

(m)

Monitori

ng W

ell



BORINGS BY

5341 Boundary Road

TP12

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

patersongroup


%

TYPE

100 200 300 400 500

FILE NO.

Ottawa, Ontario

0

1

2

PE2098

N VALUE

50 mm Dia. Cone


Full Gas Resp.

DEPTH(m)

ELEV.

REMARKS


Backhoe

Methane Elim.

DATE


Water

Grey SILTY CLAY

End of Test Pit

0.30

2.00

G 1

Consulting

Constr

uction

GROUND SURFACE

HOLE NO.

20 40 60 80

or RQD

RECOVERY

NUMBER

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10

DATUM

(m)

Monitori

ng W

ell



BORINGS BY

5341 Boundary Road

TP13

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

patersongroup


%

TYPE

100 200 300 400 500

FILE NO.

Ottawa, Ontario

0

1

2

PE2098

N VALUE

50 mm Dia. Cone


STRATA PLOT

(m)DEPTH

Consulting

Constr

uction

13 Sep 10

NUMBER

RECOVERY

or RQD

20 40 60 80

HOLE NO.

Backhoe


ELEV.


Full Gas Resp.

Brown SILTY SAND

1.60

2.50

Grey SILTY CLAY

G

FILL: Sitly clay, some shalefragments, trace sand, brickand organics

End of Test Pit

GROUND SURFACE

2.10

3

2

1

G

G

FILE NO.


Monitori

ng W

ell

Methane Elim.

100 200 300 400 500

TP14

SOIL DESCRIPTION

5341 Boundary Road

BORINGS BY


Engineers

SAMPLE

REMARKS

DATUM

DATE

(m)50 mm Dia. Cone


0

1

2

%

N VALUE


PE2098

patersongroup

TYPE

Ottawa, Ontario

Full Gas Resp.

(m)ELEV.

Consulting


Constr

uction

Methane Elim.

(m)

DATUM


FILL: Sandy silt, some clayand organics

Brown SILTY SAND

Red SILTY CLAY

End of Test Pit

1.80

2.20

DEPTH

REMARKS

GROUND SURFACE

HOLE NO.

20 40 60 80

or RQD

RECOVERY

NUMBER

STRATA PLOT

13 Sep 10Backhoe

2.80

DATE

Monitori

ng W

ell



BORINGS BY

5341 Boundary Road

TP15

SOIL DESCRIPTION

SAMPLE

patersongroup


%

TYPE

100 200 300 400 500

FILE NO.

Ottawa, Ontario

0

1

2

PE2098

N VALUE

50 mm Dia. Cone


SYMBOLS AND TERMS

SOIL DESCRIPTION Behavioural properties, such as structure and strength, take precedence over particle gradation in

describing soils. Terminology describing soil structure are as follows:

Desiccated - having visible signs of weathering by oxidation of clay

minerals, shrinkage cracks, etc.

Fissured - having cracks, and hence a blocky structure.

Varved - composed of regular alternating layers of silt and clay.

Stratified - composed of alternating layers of different soil types, e.g. silt

and sand or silt and clay.

Well-Graded - Having wide range in grain sizes and substantial amounts of

all intermediate particle sizes (see Grain Size Distribution).

Uniformly-Graded - Predominantly of one grain size (see Grain Size Distribution).

The standard terminology to describe the strength of cohesionless soils is the relative density, usually

inferred from the results of the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) ‘N’ value. The SPT N value is the

number of blows of a 63.5 kg hammer, falling 760 mm, required to drive a 51 mm O.D. split spoon

sampler 300 mm into the soil after an initial penetration of 150 mm.

Relative Density ‘N’ Value Relative Density %

Very Loose <4 <15

Loose 4-10 15-35

Compact 10-30 35-65

Dense 30-50 65-85

Very Dense >50 >85

The standard terminology to describe the strength of cohesive soils is the consistency, which is based on

the undisturbed undrained shear strength as measured by the in situ or laboratory vane tests,

penetrometer tests, unconfined compression tests, or occasionally by Standard Penetration Tests.

Consistency Undrained Shear Strength (kPa) ‘N’ Value

Very Soft <12 <2

Soft 12-25 2-4

Firm 25-50 4-8

Stiff

Very Stiff

50-100

100-200

8-15

15-30

Hard >200 >30

SYMBOLS AND TERMS (continued)

SOIL DESCRIPTION (continued) Cohesive soils can also be classified according to their “sensitivity”. The sensitivity is the ratio between

the undisturbed undrained shear strength and the remoulded undrained shear strength of the soil.

Terminology used for describing soil strata based upon texture, or the proportion of individual particle

sizes present is provided on the Textural Soil Classification Chart at the end of this information package.

ROCK DESCRIPTION The structural description of the bedrock mass is based on the Rock Quality Designation (RQD).

The RQD classification is based on a modified core recovery percentage in which all pieces of sound core

over 100 mm long are counted as recovery. The smaller pieces are considered to be a result of closely-

spaced discontinuities (resulting from shearing, jointing, faulting, or weathering) in the rock mass and are

not counted. RQD is ideally determined from NXL size core. However, it can be used on smaller core

sizes, such as BX, if the bulk of the fractures caused by drilling stresses (called “mechanical breaks”) are

easily distinguishable from the normal in situ fractures.

RQD % ROCK QUALITY

90-100 Excellent, intact, very sound

75-90 Good, massive, moderately jointed or sound

50-75 Fair, blocky and seamy, fractured

25-50 Poor, shattered and very seamy or blocky, severely fractured

0-25 Very poor, crushed, very severely fractured

SAMPLE TYPES

SS - Split spoon sample (obtained in conjunction with the performing of the Standard

Penetration Test (SPT))

TW - Thin wall tube or Shelby tube

PS - Piston sample

AU - Auger sample or bulk sample

WS - Wash sample

RC - Rock core sample (Core bit size AXT, BXL, etc.). Rock core samples are

obtained with the use of standard diamond drilling bits.

SYMBOLS AND TERMS (continued)

GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION

MC% - Natural moisture content or water content of sample, %

LL - Liquid Limit, % (water content above which soil behaves as a liquid)

PL - Plastic limit, % (water content above which soil behaves plastically)

PI - Plasticity index, % (difference between LL and PL)

Dxx - Grain size which xx% of the soil, by weight, is of finer grain sizes

These grain size descriptions are not used below 0.075 mm grain size

D10 - Grain size at which 10% of the soil is finer (effective grain size)

D60 - Grain size at which 60% of the soil is finer

Cc - Concavity coefficient = (D30)2 / (D10 x D60)

Cu - Uniformity coefficient = D60 / D10

Cc and Cu are used to assess the grading of sands and gravels:

Well-graded gravels have: 1 < Cc < 3 and Cu > 4

Well-graded sands have: 1 < Cc < 3 and Cu > 6

Sands and gravels not meeting the above requirements are poorly-graded or uniformly-graded.

Cc and Cu are not applicable for the description of soils with more than 10% silt and clay

(more than 10% finer than 0.075 mm or the #200 sieve)

CONSOLIDATION TEST

p’o - Present effective overburden pressure at sample depth

p’c - Preconsolidation pressure of (maximum past pressure on) sample

Ccr - Recompression index (in effect at pressures below p’c)

Cc - Compression index (in effect at pressures above p’c)

OC Ratio Overconsolidaton ratio = p’c / p’o

Void Ratio Initial sample void ratio = volume of voids / volume of solids

Wo - Initial water content (at start of consolidation test)

PERMEABILITY TEST

k - Coefficient of permeability or hydraulic conductivity is a measure of the ability of

water to flow through the sample. The value of k is measured at a specified unit

weight for (remoulded) cohesionless soil samples, because its value will vary

with the unit weight or density of the sample during the test.

Order Date: 14-Sep-2010 Report Date: 20-Sep-2010

Fax: (613) 226-6344Phone: (613) 226-7381

Client PO: 9282

This Certificate of Analysis contains analytical data applicable to the following samples as submitted:

Custody: 77047

Attn: Luke LopersNepean, ON K2E 7T728 Concourse Gate, Unit 1

Certificate of Analysis

Paracel ID Client ID

Paterson Group Consulting Engineers

Order #: 1038072Project: PE2098

1038072-01 TP1-21038072-02 TP3-11038072-03 TP9-11038072-04 TP10-21038072-05 TP15-1

Approved By:Mark Foto, M.Sc. For Dale Robertson, BScLaboratory Director

Page 1 of 8

Any use of these results implies your agreement that our total liabilty in connection with this work, however arising shall be limited to the amount paid by you for this work, and that our employees or agents shall not under circumstances be liable to you in connection with this work

Certificate of AnalysisClient:

Report Date: 20-Sep-2010Order Date:14-Sep-2010

Client PO: 9282 Project Description: PE2098Paterson Group Consulting Engineers

Order #: 1038072

Analysis Summary TableAnalysis Method Reference/Description Extraction Date Analysis Date

MOE (HWE), EPA 200.8 - ICP-MS 15-Sep-10 15-Sep-10Boron, availableEPA 8260 - P&T GC-MS 14-Sep-10 19-Sep-10BTEXCWS Tier 1 - P&T GC-FID 14-Sep-10 19-Sep-10CCME PHC F1CWS Tier 1 - GC-FID, extraction 15-Sep-10 16-Sep-10CCME PHC F2 - F4MOE E3056 - Extraction, colourimetric 15-Sep-10 15-Sep-10Chromium, hexavalentEPA 7471A - CVAA, digestion 15-Sep-10 15-Sep-10MercuryEPA 6020 - Digestion - ICP-MS 15-Sep-10 15-Sep-10MetalsGravimetric, calculation 15-Sep-10 15-Sep-10Solids, %

Page 2 of 8




Order #: 1038072

Client ID: TP1-2 TP3-1 TP9-1 TP10-2Sample Date: 13-Sep-1013-Sep-1013-Sep-1013-Sep-10

1038072-01 1038072-02 1038072-03 1038072-04Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil Soil Soil Soil

Physical Characteristics% Solids 83.391.185.483.30.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony -<1<1-1 ug/g dry

Arsenic -36-1 ug/g dry

Barium -156114-10 ug/g dry

Beryllium -0.60.5-0.5 ug/g dry

Boron, available -<0.5<0.5-0.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium -<0.5<0.5-0.5 ug/g dry

Chromium -5037-5 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) -<0.4<0.4-0.4 ug/g dry

Cobalt -118-1 ug/g dry

Copper -3221-5 ug/g dry

Lead -4331-1 ug/g dry

Mercury -<0.1<0.1-0.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum -1<1-1 ug/g dry

Nickel -3119-5 ug/g dry

Selenium -<1<1-1 ug/g dry

Silver -<0.3<0.3-0.3 ug/g dry

Thallium -<1<1-1 ug/g dry

Vanadium -5037-10 ug/g dry

Zinc -8259-20 ug/g dry

VolatilesBenzene <0.03--<0.030.03 ug/g dry

Ethylbenzene <0.05--<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Toluene <0.05--<0.050.05 ug/g dry

m,p-Xylenes <0.05--<0.050.05 ug/g dry

o-Xylene <0.05--<0.050.05 ug/g dry

Xylenes, total <0.10--<0.100.10 ug/g dry

Toluene-d8 Surrogate 99.2% - - 99.5%HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) <10--<1010 ug/g dry

F2 PHCs (C10-C16) <10--<1010 ug/g dry

F3 PHCs (C16-C34) <10--<1010 ug/g dry

F4 PHCs (C34-C50) <10--<1010 ug/g dry

Page 3 of 8




Order #: 1038072

Client ID: TP15-1 - - -Sample Date: ---13-Sep-10

1038072-05 - - -Sample ID:MDL/Units Soil - - -

Physical Characteristics% Solids ---89.60.1 % by Wt.

MetalsAntimony ---<11 ug/g dry

Arsenic ---21 ug/g dry

Barium ---13910 ug/g dry

Beryllium ---0.50.5 ug/g dry

Boron, available ---<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Cadmium ---<0.50.5 ug/g dry

Chromium ---485 ug/g dry

Chromium (VI) ---<0.40.4 ug/g dry

Cobalt ---101 ug/g dry

Copper ---255 ug/g dry

Lead ---271 ug/g dry

Mercury ---<0.10.1 ug/g dry

Molybdenum ---<11 ug/g dry

Nickel ---275 ug/g dry

Selenium ---<11 ug/g dry

Silver ---<0.30.3 ug/g dry

Thallium ---<11 ug/g dry

Vanadium ---4810 ug/g dry

Zinc ---6420 ug/g dry

Page 4 of 8




Order #: 1038072

Method Quality Control: Blank Analyte Result

ReportingLimit Units

SourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 10 ug/gF2 PHCs (C10-C16) ND 10 ug/gF3 PHCs (C16-C34) ND 10 ug/gF4 PHCs (C34-C50) ND 10 ug/g

MetalsAntimony ND 1 ug/gArsenic ND 1 ug/gBarium ND 10 ug/gBeryllium ND 0.5 ug/gBoron, available ND 0.5 ug/gCadmium ND 0.5 ug/gChromium (VI) ND 0.4 ug/gChromium ND 5 ug/gCobalt ND 1 ug/gCopper ND 5 ug/gLead ND 1 ug/gMercury ND 0.1 ug/gMolybdenum ND 1 ug/gNickel ND 5 ug/gSelenium ND 1 ug/gSilver ND 0.3 ug/gThallium ND 1 ug/gVanadium ND 10 ug/gZinc ND 20 ug/g

VolatilesBenzene ND 0.03 ug/gEthylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/gToluene ND 0.05 ug/gm,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/go-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/gXylenes, total ND 0.10 ug/gSurrogate: Toluene-d8 7.92 99.0 76-118ug/g

Page 5 of 8




Order #: 1038072

Method Quality Control: Duplicate Analyte Result


SourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) ND 10 ug/g dry ND 32F2 PHCs (C10-C16) 3010 10 ug/g dry 1710 50 QR-0454.9F3 PHCs (C16-C34) 2110 10 ug/g dry 1220 50 QR-0453.2F4 PHCs (C34-C50) ND 10 ug/g dry ND 50

MetalsAntimony ND 1 ug/g dry ND 26Arsenic 1.1 1 ug/g dry 1.4 3526.4Barium 108 10 ug/g dry 115 345.8Beryllium ND 0.5 ug/g dry ND 25Boron, available ND 0.5 ug/g dry ND 35Cadmium 1.08 0.5 ug/g dry 1.15 335.9Chromium (VI) ND 0.4 ug/g dry ND 35Chromium 13.7 5 ug/g dry 14.2 323.2Cobalt 3.4 1 ug/g dry 3.4 321.9Copper 26.2 5 ug/g dry 27.0 322.9Lead 97.3 1 ug/g dry 99.9 442.6Mercury 0.148 0.1 ug/g dry 0.139 356.3Molybdenum 1.2 1 ug/g dry ND 29 QR-01Nickel 8.5 5 ug/g dry 8.8 293.1Selenium ND 1 ug/g dry 1.0 28 QR-01200.0Silver ND 0.3 ug/g dry ND 28Thallium ND 1 ug/g dry ND 27Vanadium 14.1 10 ug/g dry 14.6 273.2Zinc 474 20 ug/g dry 486 272.4

Physical Characteristics% Solids 100 0.1 % by Wt. 89.5 2511.1

VolatilesBenzene ND 0.03 ug/g dry ND 50Ethylbenzene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 34Toluene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 32m,p-Xylenes ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 35o-Xylene ND 0.05 ug/g dry ND 50Surrogate: Toluene-d8 10.1 ug/g dry 99.9 76-118ND

Page 6 of 8




Order #: 1038072

Method Quality Control: Spike Analyte Result


SourceResult %REC

%RECLimit RPD

RPDLimit Notes

HydrocarbonsF1 PHCs (C6-C10) 95 ND 95.1 80-12010 ug/gF2 PHCs (C10-C16) 66 ND 82.4 61-12910 ug/gF3 PHCs (C16-C34) 165 ND 82.7 61-12910 ug/gF4 PHCs (C34-C50) 120 ND 100 61-12910 ug/g

MetalsAntimony 54.5 ND 109 80-120ug/LArsenic 47.8 ND 95.6 80-120ug/LBarium 49.0 ND 97.9 80-120ug/LBeryllium 42.8 ND 85.6 80-120ug/LBoron, available 4.45 ND 89.0 70-1220.5 ug/gCadmium 45.5 ND 90.9 80-120ug/LChromium (VI) 0.2 ND 98.0 89-123mg/LChromium 47.7 ND 95.4 80-120ug/LCobalt 46.8 ND 93.6 80-120ug/LCopper 47.3 ND 94.5 80-120ug/LLead 50.5 ND 101 80-120ug/LMercury 1.60 ND 107 72-1280.1 ug/gMolybdenum 46.2 ND 92.3 80-120ug/LNickel 46.0 ND 92.0 80-120ug/LSelenium 46.6 ND 93.1 80-120ug/LSilver 45.2 ND 90.4 80-120ug/LThallium 58.7 ND 117 80-120ug/LVanadium 46.9 ND 93.8 80-120ug/LZinc 43.1 ND 86.2 80-120ug/L

VolatilesBenzene 0.607 ND 65.0 55-1410.03 ug/gEthylbenzene 2.12 ND 95.5 61-1390.05 ug/gToluene 8.26 ND 76.5 54-1360.05 ug/gm,p-Xylenes 6.11 ND 90.8 61-1390.05 ug/go-Xylene 2.74 ND 102 60-1420.05 ug/gSurrogate: Toluene-d8 7.84 98.0 76-118ug/g

Page 7 of 8




Order #: 1038072

Sample and QC Qualifiers Notes2- QR-01 : Duplicate RPD is high, however, the sample result is less than 10x the MDL.

3- QR-04 : Duplicate results exceeds RPD limits due to non-homogeneous matrix.

Sample Data RevisionsNone

Work Order Revisions/Comments:None

Other Report Notes:

MDL: Method Detection Limitn/a: not applicable

Source Result: Data used as source for matrix and duplicate samples%REC: Percent recovery.RPD: Relative percent difference.Soil results are reported on a dry weight basis when the units are denoted with 'dry'.Where %Solids is reported, moisture loss includes the loss of volatile hydrocarbons.CCME PHC additional information:

- The method for the analysis of PHCs complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory. All prescribed quality criteria identified in the method has been met.- F1 range corrected for BTEX.- F2 to F3 ranges corrected for appropriate PAHs where available.

- In the case where F4 and F4G are both reported, the greater of the two results is to be used for comparison to CWS PHC criteria.- The gravimetric heavy hydrocarbons (F4G) are not to be added to C6 to C50 hydrocarbons.

Page 8 of 8

APPENDIX 2

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS

FIGURE 1 - KEY PLAN

DRAWING PE2098-1 - TEST HOLE LOCATION PLAN

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

1945

SITE

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

1969

SITE

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

1975

SITE

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

1986

SITE

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH

1993

SITE

SITE

FIGURE 1

KEY PLAN

SITE

Documents

PE2098-PHI-II.ESA-REP.01 - 5341 Boundary Road