12
Allison Accardi Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Allison Accardi

Peer Involvement in Social

Interaction

Page 2: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Importance of First Year of Life

• Social competence begins to develop in children as early as the first year of life

• During the first year of life, infants peer interaction is quite limited• The limitation, however, does not mean social competence is not being

acquiredInteraction and manipulation of objects

Looking intently at family members/caregivers

Page 3: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Patterns in Early School Years• Interactions between peers become more evident in early

school years• Patterns of peer interaction becomes more standardized• Social tendencies of early school aged children serve as

predictors of future social competence and function, academic ability, and overall mental health

Page 4: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Social Competence Investigation Discrepancies

Study of infant and toddler social competence has relied upon study of “development of content and complexity of peer interactions” (Williams, Ontai, Mastergeorge, 2006)

Older children’s social competence is more commonly studied by emphasizing the child’s individual differences in social competence

PopularityNegative and Aggressive Behavior

Page 5: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Negative and Aggressive Behaviors in Infants and Toddlers

• Patterns in development in very young children (infants and toddlers) utilize aggression as an adaptive social and emotional behavior

• Parents and caregivers help young children learn how to express their aggression, physical play, and negative emotions in an appropriate manner

• Developmentally, as infants and toddlers become skilled at controlling aggressive and negative behaviors, they can begin to develop more adaptive social behaviors

• Research suggests that “infants and toddlers who are aggressive also tend to be more socially competent than non-aggressive children” (Biovin et al., 2005; NICHD ECCRN, 2001; Vaughn et al., 2003)

Page 6: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Contributions to Young Children’s Socialization

• In home and outside of home child care environmental experiences influence development of social skills

• Strong factors in variance of evidence include:– Family demographics

• Income• Maternal Education

– Outside of home caregiver training– Size of care group (number of children)– Caregiver to child ratio

Page 7: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Adult Interaction• Social and emotional competencies of young children have been attributed to interaction with adults

• Parents and caregivers directly influence the interaction course between peers in young children– Adults become

involved in young children’s resolution of conflicts

– Adults obstruct interactions by individually interacting with young children

Page 8: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Investigation of Patterns of Socialization in Infants in Toddlers

• The period of infancy and toddlerhood represents a unique period of development in peer competence

• Findings suggest that negative or aggressive behavior when infants and toddlers interact include factors differing from those of older children

• Factors include– Peer sociability– Active avoidance of peers– Passive withdrawal from peer interaction

• This pattern implies that aggression and some types of negative behavior may represent other outcomes when surveyed in infant and toddler years

• Aggression and negative behavior is an adaptive behavior in the very young years and may not always be an indicator of maladaptive social competence

Page 9: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Infant and Toddler Behavior

• Current findings suggest that these aggressive and negative behaviors represent early signs of peer sociability, avoidance, and refusal (Williams, et. al., 2006)– Taking other’s toys

• Indicator for sociability– Hitting, biting, or otherwise hurting other children

• Indicator for active avoidance strategies– Crying easily around other children

• Indicator of other avoidance strategy• In sum, certain behaviors typically considered aggressive or

negative, and indicative of poor social competence across childhood (Campbell et al., 2000; Howes, 1988; NICHD ECCRN, 2001; for a review see Odom & Ogawa, 1992), may signify normative attempts to interact with peers, or to refuse and avoid social interaction, in infancy and toddlerhood

Page 10: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Socioeconomic Status (SES)• Research has found that children from families of higher socioeconomic

status (SES) have tested to demonstrate higher levels of peer refusals in some contexts

• This unexpected finding may be attributed to families of advanced SES have a tendency to regulate the actions of their children and playmates– For example, “play dates” are arranged by parents thus play time

becomes more structured– Peer interactions then become controlled by adult contact

• However, recent work suggests that family SES may relate differently to children’s social competence in classrooms or schools than it does in other settings (Schneider, Richard, Younger, & Freeman, 2000)

Page 11: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

Summary

• Research has shown that negative and aggressive interactive behavior in infancy and toddlerhood does not characterize an exclusive aspect of social competence

• Rather patterns of peer interaction can be characterized by:– sociability with peers– active refusal of peer interaction– passive avoidance of interaction with peers

• Each of these three dimensions of peer competence appears to demonstrate its own developmental antecedents. – Peer sociability is attributed to caregiver disruption of peer

interaction– Active peer refusal and passive peer avoidance are more

narrowly coupled to individual temperament of a child– Active peer refusal can also be accounted for, in part, by the

child’s family socioeconomic status

Page 12: Peer Involvement in Social Interaction

ReferencesBiovin, M., Vitaro, F., & Poulin, F. (2005). Peer relationships and the development of aggressive

behavior in early childhood. In R. E. Tremblay, W.W. Hartup & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Campbell, J. J., Lamb, M. E., & Hwang, C. P. (2000). Early child-care experiences and children’s social competence between 1 1/2 and 15 years of age. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 166–175.

Howes. (1988). Peer interaction in young children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 53.

NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2001). Child care and children’s peer interaction at 24 and 36 months: The NICHD study of early child care. Child Development, 72, 1478–1500.

Odom, S. L., & Ogawa, I. (1992). Direct observation of young children’s social interaction with peers: A review of methodology. Behavioral Assessment, 14, 407–441.

Schneider, B., Richard, J., Younger, A., & Freeman, P. (2000). A longitudinal exploration of children’s social participation and social withdrawal across socioeconomic status levels and social settings. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 497–519.

Williams, S. T., Ontai, L.L., & Mastergeorge, A.M. (2006). Reformulating infant and toddler social competence with peers. Infant Behavior & Development 30 (2007) 353–365.