Upload
lester-shaw
View
95
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Penetrating Neck Injuries. Penetrating Neck Injuries. Case 1 19 year old male in Casuarina stabbed back of neck with steak knife (8cm) Zone II injury haemodynamically stable. Penetrating Neck Injuries. Penetrating Neck Injuries. Penetrating Neck Injuries. Case 2 27 year old male - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Penetrating Neck Injuries
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Case 1– 19 year old male in Casuarina– stabbed back of neck with steak knife (8cm)– Zone II injury– haemodynamically stable
Penetrating Neck Injuries
Penetrating Neck Injuries
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Case 2– 27 year old male– stabbed in anterior triangle– Zone I injury– required resuscitation at scene– fixed dilated pupils on presentation
Penetrating Neck Injuries
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Epidemiology– stab wounds or low velocity missiles– young, otherwise healthy and intoxicated– carotid artery involved in 6%– account for 22% of all cervical vascular trauma
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Classification– Anterior/Posterior neck triangles– Zones
• I = Between clavicle and cricoid
• II = cricoid and angle of mandible
• III = angle of mandible to BOS
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Zone II most common (47%)
• Zone I (18%) and Zone III (19%)
• multiple zones (16%)
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Injuries– arterial– venous– neurological– oesophagus– airways
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Findings: airways– airways obstruction– haemoptysis– air bubbling through wound– subcutaneous emphysema– hoarseness– painful swallowing– haematemesis
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Findings: vascular– haemodynamic instability– haematoma– reduced pulses (CA, STA, RA)– bruit/thrill
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Findings: neurological– GCS– focal UMN signs– cranial nerves (VII, IX, X, XI, XII)– cervical spinal cord– Horner’s syndrome– Brachial plexus
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Management– ABCD– surgical exploration for ‘hard’ signs of vascular
injury (shock, active beeding, enlarging haematoma, bruit/thrill)
– stable patients with Zone I and III injuries: angiography with selective intervention
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Zone II Controversies– Mandatory versus Selective exploration – Accuracy of physical examination– investigation
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Mandatory exploration– Apffelstaedt et al. World J Surg 1994
• 393 consecutive patients over 20 months
• 30% of (+) neck explorations had absent clinical signs
• low morbidity/mortality in negative explorations
• investigations have false (-) and false (+) rates
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Selective exploration– Demetriades et al. World J Surg 1997
• 223 patients over 20 months, 176 had angiography
• 34(19%) had positive angiography, 8% required treatment
• 34 patients with soft signs, 8 had (+) angiogram but only 1 required treatment
• mandatory exploration leads to high rate (30-89%) of unnecessary operations
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Physical Examination– Sekharan et al, J Vasc Surg 2000
• 145 zone II injuries, retrospective chart review
• 31 had hard signs, 90% (+) exploration
• 23 had angiogram due to proximity to major structures or involving more than 1 zone.
• 91patients were observed without imaging or surgery with no evidence of subsequent vascular injury up to 2 weeks.
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Physical Examination– accuracy of 99% in diagnosing significant
vascular injuries with a false negative rate comparable to angiography.
– However most studies are prolonged retrospective studies with no uniform protocol
– May miss occult lesions such as smooth narrowings, intimal irregularities and small psedoaneurysms and AV fistulas
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• Duplex Ultrasound– Demetriades et al. 99 patients had duplex
• 11 lesions correctly identified (6 VA, 4 CA, 1 SCA)
• 1 missed lesion (CCA/VA small intimal tears)
• sensitivity 91%, specificity 100%, PPV 100% and NPV 99%.
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• CT– Mazolewski et al. J Trauma 2001
• 14 stable patients Level 2
• sensitivity 100%, specificity 91%, PPV 75% and NPV 100%
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• vertebral artery injury– clinical presentation and outcome related to
associated injuries.– 72% have no evidence of arterial trauma– low incidence of brain stem ischaemia with
unilateral VA ligation
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• oesophageal injury– very low prevalence– Demetriades et al
• only symptomatic or obtunded patients should undergo investigations
Penetrating Neck Injuries
• venous injury– ligation for major cervicomediastinal venous
trauma is generally well tolerated