25
Poten&al Policy Pathways for Oregon Sean Penrith Execu&ve Director The Climate Trust 9/24/15 INVEST WITH PURPOSE

Penrith - Oregon Carbon Policy Options for Legislators-150911-CAM

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Poten&alPolicyPathwaysforOregon

SeanPenrith

Execu&veDirectorTheClimateTrust

9/24/15

INVESTWITHPURPOSE

Topics

•  Targets

•  Realworldperformance

•  Oregon’schoices

•  Implica&onsfortheregion&compliancewith

CleanPowerPlan

CarbonMarketandSpecialPurposeFundManagementExperience•  Managedover$43millionincarbonfinancingforgreenhousegasemissionreduc&onprojectsandseven

na&onalprograms.•  Over18yearsofexperienceindomes&cvoluntary&compliancecarbonmarkets.

History•  TheOregonLegislatureestablishedtheOregonCarbonDioxideStandardin1997,requiringpowerplantsto

mi&gateapor&onoftheirGHGemissions.•  Todate,allnewOregonplantshaveelectedtopayTheClimateTrusttomanagethiscomplianceobliga&on.

TheClimateTrustiscurrentlymanaging$22millionfromthisprogram.

3

TCTPorXolio

StrongOregonFocus

TMFBiofuels,Boardman

OSU,Corvalis

RoseburgLFG,DouglasCounty

Astoria

Commi]ed$6,141,754toOregon-baseddigesterprojectsforecasttodeliver741,054credits.Theprojectsare:1.FarmPowerTillamook-Tillamook2.FarmPowerMistyMeadow-Tillamook3.JCBiomethane-Junc&onCity4.RESLochmead-Junc&onCity5.RESOakLea-Aumsville6.RoseburgLFG-Roseburg7.TMFThreeMileCanyonFarms-Boardman

Currently$0.50ofeverydollarcommi]ediskeptinOregonundertheCO2Std.

2015DracReport

“Oregon’s emissions in 2020 projected to be ~11 MMTe in excess of the 51 MMTe state goal established by Legislature for that year."

By 2035, absent significant additional intervention, the gap (between business-as-usual emissions and a linear trajectory to the 2050 goal) is likely to exceed 30 MMTe.”

TheClimateTrust’scarbonpricingresearch•  Comprehensiveprimaryandsecondarypeerreviewedresearchpublished2014[report]•  Examined>iveexistingmechanismsaroundtheworld

ResearchContext

3concerns:•  Isola&onfromorintegra&onwithsurrounding

C&Tstates

•  Alignmentwithstategoals

•  Progressmadetowardsreal&credibleCO2reduc&on(in&me)

2researchques&ons:•  WhatmighthappenifOregonchoosesatax?•  WhatmighthappenifOregonchoosescap&trade?

C&T?

C&T

?

Indicestracked

Carbonpricingasatool

CarbonPricing101:Decisioncriteria:Doesthestatewantcertaintyonprice,orcertaintyofCO2reduc&ons?1.  CarbonTaxa&on:RegulatedpriceoneachtonofCO2

emi]ed,butemissionsareallowedtofluctuate

2.  Cap&Trade:Placea“cap”orlimitontotalpermissibleemissions,butpricespertonofCO2areallowedtofluctuate

Keyfindings

Oncepassed,programsurvivabilitywasdeterminedbybuilt-inflexibilitytowithstandpoli&calturnoverandeffec&veholis&cprogramdesigntoachieveresultsacrossallindicators.

TheClimateTrust’scarbonpricingresearch

•  Impactsonkeyindices:•  Takeawaymessages:

•  Designformaximumimpactacrossallfourindices

•  ManagerevenueresponsiblyandlinkrevenuetoGHGreduc&on•  Considercomplimentarypolicies•  Planforpoli&calturnover•  Beginsimplyandincreasecomplexityover&me•  Priori&zeflexibility,transparency,andvalidity

Currentstatusofthesesystems:California

•  Emissionsaredownby3.8%forcoveredenNNes

•  CAgrewitseconomy6.6%between2010and2013

•  C&Tauc&onrevenuepassed$1.6Bmark

•  CAa]racted$21BincleanenergyinvestmentcapitalsincesigningofAB32

•  491,000jobsadded(3.3%growth;na&onal2.5%)

•  25%ofprogramrevenuetargetedatdisadvantagedcommuni&es

•  Californialeadsthena&onwiththehighesttotalmanufacturingoutput($239B)ofanystate

Currentstatusofthesesystems:BC•  Taxhasreducedemissions5-15%

dependingonmodelingused•  BC’seconomyhasoutperformedtherest

ofCanadaduringthe&methetaxhasbeenineffect

•  Taxfrozenat$30/tonsince2013•  Becausetheystoppedraisingthetax,

revenueisfallingbehind–moreisbeingreturned!

•  $1B/yeartaxrevenuesoffsetothertaxes,buthascreateddoubtonenvironmentalbenefitthisapproachachieves

Credit:SightlineIns&tute

Sources:“BC’SCARBONTAXSHIFTAFTERFIVEYEARS:RESULTSAnEnvironmental(andEconomic)SuccessStory”,SustainableProsperity2013“Bri&shColumbia’sRevenue-NeutralCarbonTax:AReviewoftheLatest“GrandExperiment”inEnvironmentalPolicy”,SustainableProsperity,NicholasIns&tuteatDukeUniversityandUniversityofO]owa,2015

Currentstatusofthesesystems:RGGI•  Emissionsfrompowerplantsdown40%since2010,

halfofthisa]ributeddirectlytoRGGI•  Totaleconomicgainstoregionof$2.9BinRGGI’s

firstsixyears•  30,200job-yearsaddedtoregioninRGGI’sfirstsix

years•  Totalrevenueraisedsofarover$2.2B,nearlyall

reinvestedincleanenergy,renewables,jobs,etc.•  Consumershavesavedacumula&ve$341Mon

electricityand$118Mongasandoil•  Mostrecentauc&onclearedat$6.02,raising$152M•  6of8RGGIstatessubjecttotheCPParesetto

achievetheir2030targetsby2020!

Credit:SightlineIns&tute

ExpenditureofRGGIproceeds:

Sources:“TheEconomicImpactsoftheRegionalGreenhouseGasIni&a&veonTenNortheastandMid-Atlan&cStates”,TheAnalysisGroup2011“TheEconomicImpactsoftheRegionalGreenhouseGasIni&a&veonNineNortheastandMid-Atlan&cStates”.TheAnalysisGroup2015Auc&onresultsfromRGGI.org,Sept.2015

Currentstatusofthesesystems:EUETS

•  TheEUgrewitsGDPby45%between1990and2012,whilereducingemissions19%

•  EUhassetanemissionreduc&ontargetof40%by2030andhasproposedchangestotheETStohelpmeetthisgoal:•  Allowanceswillbeheldoffthemarket

ininstancesofoversupply(backloading)•  Capwilldeclinefasteracer2020(2.2%

peryear)Sources:EUETSpagesoftheEuropeanCommissionwebsite,h]p://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/index_en.htm

Commonapproachestoclimatemi&ga&onPros Cons

Regula&on •  Emissionreduc&onispriori&zed •  Moreexpensivethanmarketbasedsolu&ons,duetolackofabatementflexibility

•  Subjecttorepealduetopoli&calturnover

CarbonTax •  Easytounderstand•  Mayu&lizeexis&ngadministra&on

structures

•  Emissionreduc&onsnotassured•  Canberegressiveifdesignedincorrectly•  Needslegisla&veapprovaltoincreaseover&me•  Difficulttoharmonizethroughouttheregion

CapandTrade •  Emissionreduc&onsassured•  Revenueraisedcanbereinvestedinlow-

carboneconomicdevelopment•  Cost-containmentmechanismsarebuiltin•  Enableslowestcosta]ainmentthrough

trading

•  Requireseffec&veadministra&onandoversight•  Complexityaroundintegra&onwithexis&ng

policiesanduseofrevenuesderived

FeeandDividend

•  Creates“s&ckiness”topreventagainstrepeal

•  Socialequityisques&onableifeveryonereceivessameamount

•  Dividenddistribu&onmaynotcontributetodevelopmentoflowcarboneconomy

Sources:“Markets versus Regulation: The Efficiency and Distributional Impacts of U.S. Climate Policy Proposals”, MIT May 2014

Oregon’sChoices1)  Cap&Trade(HB3470):ModeledacerCalifornia’sAB32

•  GivesORS468A.205greenhousegasreduc&ongoalsthemandateitneeds(10%below1990levelsby2020and75%below1990levelsby2050).

•  Appliesthebestavailablescience.•  ConsolidatesOregonlaws,rulesandpoliciesaboutemissionsintoacomprehensiveframework.•  Mandatesemissionreduc&onswhicharereal,quan&fiable,verifiableandenforceable.•  Requiresleastcostimplementa&onstrategies.•  Providesprotec&onsthatimpactsdonotfalldispropor&onatelyonlowincomecommuni&es.•  Authorizesamarket-basedtradingandauc&onprogramsimilartoCalifornialawAB32.•  Whileopponentsofcap&tradearguethatitscomplexi&esareadisadvantage,thissamecomplexity

maycontributetoincreaseddifficultyinrepealingacap&tradeprogramonceinplace.

Oregon’sChoices2)CarbonTax(anddividend):•  Sendscomprehensiblemarket-basedmessagetoconsumers,peopleunderstand"tax.”•  Taxa&onisgenerallyperceivedaseasiertoadministerbecauseitcanu&lizepor&onsofexis&ng

taxstructures.•  Canchoosetoremitsfundsbacktoci&zensdesignedtobuildsupport(s&ckiness).•  Offerspricecertaintytoaidindustryplanning(Note,thepriceofcarbonundertheEUETS--the

mostvola&lesystemweexamined--wasnomorevola&lethanthatoffossilfuelscommodi&eslikeoilornaturalgas).

•  Itisnotablethattherearenotyetanymul&-jurisdic&onalcarbontaxschemes;thecomplexityofwri&nginterlockingtaxcodeforjurisdic&onswithinaregionmayhavepreventedthistypeofschemetodate.

•  Ataxdesignhastocontemplatepricingthatwillassurea]ainmentofstate’sGHGreduc&ongoals.

•  Targetedreinvestmentof(apor&on)taxproceedsshouldbuildacleaneconomy/jobs.

Bearinmind….•  NeitherC&Tortaxonitsownislikelytoreduceemissionsenough

tomeetthedrama&cemissionreduc&ontargetsneeded.•  California’sAB32wasneverabillspecificallyaboutcap-and-trade.

ItwasacomprehensivebundletomeetitsGHGreduc&ongoals.•  A‘marketbased’mechanismwasalsoarequirementunderAB32,

thoughnotspecified.•  AllrevenuefromAB32’scap&trademust,bylaw,beusedto

reducegreenhousegasemissions•  AB32’sdecreasingcapwithfloorprice+costcontainmentreserve

=>benefitsofcapwithpricecertainty/stability.•  SomeEuropeancountries,likeSweden,areusingtaxesasan

elementofcomplementarypolicy,tocoversectorsnotcoveredbycapandtrade.

•  Goodprogramdesigncanshieldagainsttheriskofgamingormarketmanipula&on.

Implica&ons:RegionalMarket•  Oregon,Washington,California,andBChavepledgedtoaligntheircarbonpolicyefforts•  Quebecannouncednewcarbonreduc&onofa37%reduc&onbelow1990levelsby2030,themost

ambi&oussuchtargetinCanada.LinkingwithOntarioETS•  TheWestCoastrepresentstheworld’s5thlargesteconomy•  By2017,¼oftheworld’semissionswillbepricedinsomeform!

Implica&ons:CompliancewithCleanPowerPlan

EmissionStandardsPlan–stateplacesfederallyenforceableemissionstandardsonaffectedelectricgenera&ngunits(EGUs)thatfullymeettheemissionguidelines

-canbedesignedtomeettheCO2emissionperformanceratesorstategoal(rate- basedormass-basedgoal)

StateMeasuresPlan-stateincludes,atleastinpart,measuresimplementedbythestatethatarenotincludedasfederallyenforceableemissionstandards

-designedtoachievethestateCO2mass-basedgoal-includesfederallyenforceablemeasuresasabackstop

Credit:IETAandEPA•  Stateshaveflexibilityto

designtheirowncompliancestrategieswiththeCPP

•  Choiceofrateormassbasedapproach

•  Emissionstradingisencouraged

•  Manystatesalreadyexploringinterstatetradingprogramsasamethodofcompliance

Oregoncanpricecarboninawaythatreducesemissions,contributestolow-carboneconomicgrowth,provideswell-paying

jobs,andincreasessocialequity.

Centralclosingques&on:

Istherea4metoacknowledgethata‘compe44vedisadvantage’rela4vetootherjurisdic4onspalesinthefaceofplanetarydisadvantageifwecon4nuetoprocras4nate?

[email protected]:

A.“AnEvalua&onofPoten&alCarbonPricingMechanismsfortheStateofOregon”h]p://climatetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/An-Evalua&on-of-Poten&al-Carbon-Pricing-Mechanisms-for-the-State-of-Oregon.pdfB.“AchievingCarbonRevenueLeverage”h]ps://climatetrust.box.com/s/4r9024k54fyxgbtlpufpC.DraUOregonGlobalWarmingCommissionReporth]p://www.keeporegoncool.org/mee&ng/oregon-global-warming-commission-mee&ng-%E2%80%93-september-2015D.MarketsversusRegula&on:TheEfficiencyandDistribu&onalImpactsofU.S.ClimatePolicyProposalsh]p://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Rpt263.pdf