339
PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. ©

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT

Herman AguinisHerman Aguinis

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT

Herman AguinisHerman Aguinis

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 2: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management in Context: Performance Management in Context: OverviewOverview

Definition of Performance Management (PM) The Performance Management Contribution Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PM

systems Definition of Reward Systems Aims and role of PM Systems Characteristics of an Ideal PM system Integration with Other Human Resources and

Development Activities

Page 3: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management: DefinitionPerformance Management: Definition

Continuous Process ofIdentifying performance of individuals and teamsMeasuring performance of individuals and teamsDeveloping performance of individuals and teams

andAligning performance with the strategic goals of the

organization

Page 4: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

PM is NOT performance PM is NOT performance appraisalappraisal

• PM– Strategic business

considerations– Ongoing feedback– So employee can

improve performance– Driven by line manager

• Performance appraisal– Assesses employee

• Strengths & • Weaknesses

– Once a year– Lacks ongoing feedback– Driven by HR

Page 5: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Contributions of PM Contributions of PM For EmployeesFor Employees

The definitions of job and success are clarifiedMotivation to perform is increasedSelf-esteem is increasedSelf-insight and development and enhanced

Page 6: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Contributions of PMContributions of PMFor ManagersFor Managers

Supervisors’ views of performance are communicated more clearly

Managers gain insight about subordinatesThere is better and more timely differentiation

between good and poor performersEmployees become more competent

Page 7: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Contributions of PM Contributions of PM For Organization/HR FunctionFor Organization/HR Function

Organizational goals are made clearOrganizational change is facilitated Administrative actions are more fair and

appropriateThere is better protection from lawsuits

Page 8: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Disadvantages/Dangers of Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PM Systems Poorly-implemented PM Systems

for Employeesfor Employees

• Lowered self-esteem• Employee burnout and job dissatisfaction• Damaged relationships• Use of false or misleading information

Page 9: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Disadvantages/Dangers of Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PM Systems Poorly-implemented PM Systems

for Managersfor Managers

• Increased turnover• Decreased motivation to perform• Unjustified demands on managers’ resources• Varying and unfair standards and ratings

Page 10: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

• Wasted time and money• Unclear ratings system• Emerging biases• Increased risk of litigation

Disadvantages/Dangers of Disadvantages/Dangers of Poorly-implemented PM Systems Poorly-implemented PM Systems

for Organizationfor Organization

Page 11: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Reward Systems: DefinitionReward Systems: Definition

Set of mechanisms for distributingTangible returns

andIntangible or relational returns

As part of an employment relationship

Page 12: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Tangible returnsTangible returns

Cash compensationBase payCost-of-Living & Contingent PayIncentives (short- and long-term)

Benefits, such as Income ProtectionAllowancesWork/life focus

Page 13: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Intangible returnsIntangible returns

Relational returns, such asRecognition and statusEmployment securityChallenging work Learning opportunities

Page 14: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Returns and Their Degree of DependencyReturns and Their Degree of Dependencyon the Performance Management Systemon the Performance Management System

Return Cost of Living Adjustment Income Protection Work/life Focus Allowances Relational Returns Base Pay Contingent Pay Short-term Incentives Long-term Incentives

Degree of Dependency• Low• Low• Moderate• Moderate• Moderate• Moderate• High• High• High

Page 15: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Purposes of PM Systems:Purposes of PM Systems:OverviewOverview

StrategicAdministrativeInformationalDevelopmentalOrganizational maintenanceDocumentation

Page 16: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Strategic PurposeStrategic Purpose

Link employee behavior with organization’s goals

Communicate most crucial business strategic initiatives

Page 17: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Administrative PurposeAdministrative Purpose

Provide information for making decisions re:Salary adjustmentsPromotionsRetention or terminationRecognition of individual performanceLayoffs

Page 18: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Informational PurposeInformational Purpose

Communicate to Employees:ExpectationsWhat is importantHow they are doingHow to improve

Page 19: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Developmental PurposeDevelopmental Purpose

Performance feedback/coachingIdentification of individual strengths and

weaknessesCauses of performance deficienciesTailor development of individual career path

Page 20: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Organizational Maintenance PurposeOrganizational Maintenance Purpose

Plan effective workforceAssess future training needsEvaluate performance at organizational levelEvaluate effectiveness of HR interventions

Page 21: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Documentational PurposeDocumentational Purpose

Validate selection instrumentsDocument administrative decisionsHelp meet legal requirements

Page 22: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Characteristics of an Ideal PM SystemCharacteristics of an Ideal PM System

Page 23: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Congruent with organizational strategyCongruent with organizational strategy

• Consistent with organization’s strategy• Aligned with unit and organizational goals

Page 24: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

ThoroughThorough

• All employees are evaluated• All major job responsibilities are evaluated• Evaluations cover performance for entire

review period• Feedback is given on both positive and

negative performance

Page 25: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

PracticalPractical

• Available• Easy to use• Acceptable to decision makers• Benefits outweigh costs

Page 26: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

MeaningfulMeaningful

• Standards are important and relevant• System measures ONLY what employee can

control• Results have consequences Evaluations

occur regularly and at appropriate times• System provides for continuing skill

development of evaluators

Page 27: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

SpecificSpecific

Concrete and detailed guidance to employees • what’s expected • how to meet the expectations

Page 28: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Identifies effective and ineffective performanceIdentifies effective and ineffective performance

• Distinguish between effective and ineffective– Behaviors– Results

• Provide ability to identify employees with various levels of performance

Page 29: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

ReliableReliable

• Consistent• Free of error• Inter-rater reliability

Page 30: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

ValidValid

• Relevant (measures what is important)• Not deficient (doesn’t measure unimportant

facets of job)• Not contaminated (only measures what the

employee can control)

Page 31: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Acceptable and FairAcceptable and Fair

• Perception of Distributive Justice– Work performed evaluation received reward

• Perception of Procedural Justice– Fairness of procedures used to:

• Determine ratings• Link ratings to rewards

Page 32: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

InclusiveInclusive

• Represents concerns of all involved– When system is created, employees should help

with deciding• What should be measured• How it should be measured

– Employee should provide input on performance prior to evaluation meeting

Page 33: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Open (Open (NoNo Secrets) Secrets)

• Frequent, ongoing evaluations and feedback• 2-way communications in appraisal meeting• Clear standards, ongoing communication• Communications are factual, open, honest

Page 34: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

CorrectableCorrectable

• Recognizes that human judgment is fallible• Appeals process provided

Page 35: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

StandardizedStandardized

• Ongoing training of managers to provide• Consistent evaluations across

– People– Time

Page 36: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

EthicalEthical

• Supervisor suppresses self-interest• Supervisor rates only where she has sufficient

information about the performance dimension • Supervisor respects employee privacy

Page 37: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Integration with other Human Resources Integration with other Human Resources and Development activitiesand Development activities

PM provides information for:Development of training to meet organizational

needsWorkforce planningRecruitment and hiring decisionsDevelopment of compensation systems

Page 38: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 2CHAPTER 2

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 39: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–39

Performance Management Process:Performance Management Process:OverviewOverview

PrerequisitesPerformance PlanningPerformance ExecutionPerformance AssessmentPerformance ReviewPerformance Renewal and Recontracting

Page 40: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–40

Performance Management ProcessPerformance Management Process

Performance Review

Performance Renewal and Recontracting

Performance Assessment

Performance Execution

Performance PlanningPrerequisites

Page 41: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–41

PrerequisitesPrerequisites

A. Knowledge of the organization’s mission and strategic goals

B. Knowledge of the job in question

Page 42: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–42

A.A. Knowledge of mission Knowledge of mission and strategic goals and strategic goals

• Strategic planning – Purpose or reason for organization’s

existence– Where organization is going– Organizational goals– Strategies for attaining goals

Page 43: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–43

Mission and GoalsMission and Goals

Cascade effect throughout organization

Organization Unit Employee

Page 44: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–44

B.B. Knowledge of the jobKnowledge of the job

• Job analysis of key components– Activities, tasks, products, services, processes

• KSAs required to do the job– Knowledge– Skills– Abilities

Page 45: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–45

Job DescriptionJob Description

• Job duties• KSAs• Working conditions

Page 46: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–46

Generic Job DescriptionsGeneric Job Descriptions

Occupational Informational Network (O*Net) http://online.onetcenter.org/

Page 47: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–47

Job analysisJob analysis

• Use a variety of tools– Interviews– Observation– Questionnaires (available on Internet)

Page 48: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–48

Job analysis follow-upJob analysis follow-up

• All incumbents should – review information and – provide feedback

re:– Task

• Frequency• Criticality

Page 49: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–49

Performance Planning:Performance Planning:ResultsResults

Key accountabilities

Specific objectives

Performance standards

Page 50: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–50

Key AccountabilitiesKey Accountabilities

Broad areas of a job for which

the employee is responsible for producing results

Page 51: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–51

Specific ObjectivesSpecific Objectives

Statements of outcomes Important Measurable

Page 52: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–52

Performance StandardsPerformance Standards

• “Yardstick” to evaluate how well employees have achieved each objective

• Information on acceptable and unacceptable performance, such asqualityquantity costtime

Page 53: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–53

Performance Planning:Performance Planning:BehaviorsBehaviors

How a job is done

Page 54: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–54

Performance Planning:Performance Planning:CompetenciesCompetencies

• Measurable clusters of KSAs

• Critical in determining how results will be achieved

Page 55: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–55

Performance Planning:Performance Planning:Development PlanDevelopment Plan

Areas for improvement Goals to be achieved in each area of

improvement

Page 56: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–56

Performance Execution:Performance Execution:Employee ResponsibilitiesEmployee Responsibilities

Commitment to goal achievement Ongoing requests for feedback and coaching Communication with supervisor Collecting and sharing performance data Preparing for performance reviews

Page 57: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–57

Performance Execution:Performance Execution:Manager ResponsibilitiesManager Responsibilities

• Observation and documentation• Updates• Feedback• Resources• Reinforcement

Page 58: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–58

Performance AssessmentPerformance Assessment

• Manager assessment• Self-assessment• Other sources (e.g., peers, customers, etc.)

Page 59: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–59

Multiple Assessments Are NecessaryMultiple Assessments Are Necessary

Increase employee ownershipIncrease commitmentProvide informationEnsure mutual understanding

Page 60: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–60

Performance ReviewPerformance ReviewOverview of Appraisal MeetingOverview of Appraisal Meeting

• Past– Behaviors and results

• Present– Compensation to be received

• Future– New goals and development plans

Page 61: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–61

Six Steps for Conducting Six Steps for Conducting Productive Performance ReviewsProductive Performance Reviews

1. Identify what the employee has done well and poorly

2. Solicit feedback3. Discuss the implications of changing behaviors

Page 62: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–62

Six Steps for Conducting Six Steps for Conducting Productive Performance ReviewsProductive Performance Reviews

4. Explain how skills used in past achievements can help overcome any performance problems

5. Agree on an action plan6. Set a follow-up meeting and agree on

behaviors, actions, attitudes to be evaluated

Page 63: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–63

Performance Renewal andPerformance Renewal andRecontractingRecontracting

• Same as/different from Performance Planning– Uses insights and information from previous

phases– Cycle begins again

Page 64: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006 2–64

Performance Management ProcessPerformance Management ProcessSummary: Key PointsSummary: Key Points

Ongoing processEach component is important

If one is implemented poorly, whole system suffersLinks between components must be clear

Page 65: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 3CHAPTER 3

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 66: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management and Strategic Performance Management and Strategic Planning: OverviewPlanning: Overview

Definition and Purposes of Strategic PlanningLinking Performance Management to the

Strategic Plan– Strategic Planning – Developing Strategic Plans at the Unit Level– Job Descriptions– Individual and Team Performance

Building Support

Page 67: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Strategic Planning: Definition Strategic Planning: Definition

• Process– Describe organization’s destination– Assess barriers– Select approaches for moving forward

Page 68: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Strategic Planning: GoalStrategic Planning: Goal

• Allocate resources – to provide organization – with competitive advantage

Page 69: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Strategic Planning: PurposesStrategic Planning: Purposes

Help define the organization’s identity Help organization prepare for the future Enhance ability to adapt to environmental

change Provide focus and allow for better

allocation of resources

(continued on next slide)

Page 70: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Strategic Planning: PurposesStrategic Planning: Purposes

Produce an organizational culture of cooperation

Allow for the consideration of new options and opportunities

Provide employees with information to direct daily activities

Page 71: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Strategic Planning : OverviewStrategic Planning : Overview

1. Environmental Analysis2. Mission3. Vision4. Goals5. Strategies

Page 72: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Environmental AnalysisEnvironmental Analysis

Identifies external and internal trends• To understand broad industry issues• To make decisions using “big picture” context

Page 73: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

External trendsExternal trends

• Opportunities: – environmental characteristics that can help

the organization succeed

• Threats: – environmental characteristics that can

prevent the organization from being successful

Page 74: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

External trends – External trends – Factors to ConsiderFactors to Consider

• Economic• Political/legal • Social

• Technological• Competitors• Customers• Suppliers

Page 75: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Internal trendsInternal trends

• Strengths: – internal characteristics that the organization

can use for its advantage• Weaknesses:

– internal characteristics that can hinder the success of the organization

Page 76: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Internal trends – Internal trends – Factors to ConsiderFactors to Consider

• Organizational structure• Organizational culture• Politics• Processes• Size

Page 77: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Gap AnalysisGap Analysis

Analyzes:External environment (opportunities and threats)

vis-à-vis

Internal environment(strengths and weaknesses)

Page 78: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Gap analysis determines:Gap analysis determines:

Opportunity + Strength = Leverage

Opportunity + Weakness = Constraint

Threat + Strength = Vulnerability

Threat + Weakness = Problem

Page 79: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Strategic Planning for the OrganizationStrategic Planning for the Organization

Environmental and Gap Analyses provide information for organizations to decide:Who they areWhat they do

Page 80: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

MissionMission

A good mission statement answers:Why does the organization exist?What is the scope of the organization’s activities?Who are the customers served?What are the products or services offered?

Page 81: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Mission Statement contains:Mission Statement contains:

A. Information on organization’s Basic product/service to be offered Primary market/customer groups Unique benefits and advantages of

product/services Technology to be used Concern for survival through growth and

profitability

Page 82: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Mission Statement Mission Statement maymay contain: contain:

B. Information on organization’s values and beliefs Managerial philosophy Public image sought by organization Self-concept of business adopted by

Employees Stockholders

Page 83: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

VisionVision

• Statement of future aspirations• Focuses attention on what is important• Provides context for evaluating

– Opportunities– Threats

Page 84: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

A Good Vision Statement is:A Good Vision Statement is:

BriefVerifiableBound by a TimelineCurrent

FocusedUnderstandableInspiringA stretch

Page 85: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Purposes for Setting GoalsPurposes for Setting Goals

• Formalize expected achievements• Provide motivation• Provide tangible targets • Provide basis for good decisions• Provide basis for performance measurement

Page 86: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

StrategiesStrategies

• Create strategies or Game Plans or “How to” procedures to address issues of:– Growth– Survival– Turnaround– Stability– Innovation– Leadership

Page 87: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

How the HR Function contributes:How the HR Function contributes:

• Communicate knowledge of strategic plan• Provide knowledge of KSAs needed for

strategy implementation• Propose reward systems

Page 88: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Strategic Plans at the Unit LevelStrategic Plans at the Unit Level

• Organization Mission statement, Vision statement, Goals, and Strategies

Must clearly align with

And be congruent with

• Every Unit Mission statement, Vision statement, Goals, and Strategies

Page 89: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Alignment of Strategic Plan with Alignment of Strategic Plan with PerformancePerformance

Organization’s Strategic PlanMission, Vision, Goals, Strategies

Unit’s Strategic PlanMission, Vision, Goals,

StrategiesJob Description

Tasks, KSAs

Individual and Team PerformanceResults, Behaviors, Developmental Plan

Critical to involve all levels of management

Critical to involve all employees

Page 90: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Job DescriptionsJob Descriptions

• Tasks and KSAs are congruent with Organization and Unit strategic plans

• Activities described support mission and vision of Organization and Unit

Page 91: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Individual and Team PerformanceIndividual and Team Performance

Organization and Unit mission, vision, goals lead toPerformance management system, which

Motivates employees Aligns development plans with organization priorities

Page 92: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Strategic Plan Strategic Plan Choices in PM System DesignChoices in PM System Design

• Criteria (Behavior vs. Results)• Participation (Low vs. High)• Temporal Dimension (Short Term vs. Long Term)• Level of Criteria (Individual vs. Team/Group)• System Orientation (Developmental vs.

Administrative)• Rewards (Pay for Performance vs. Tenure/Position)

Page 93: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Building Support – Building Support – Answering “What’s In It for Me?”Answering “What’s In It for Me?”

• Top Management: – Help carry out vision

• All levels: – Involvement – Participation – Understanding

Page 94: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 4CHAPTER 4

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 95: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Defining Performance and Choosing a Defining Performance and Choosing a Measurement Approach: OverviewMeasurement Approach: Overview

Defining PerformanceDeterminants of PerformancePerformance DimensionsApproaches to Measuring Performance

Page 96: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Defining Performance Defining Performance

Performance is:• Behavior• What employees do

Page 97: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Defining PerformanceDefining Performance

Performance is NOT:• Results or Outcomes• What employees produce

Page 98: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Behaviors labeled as Performance are:Behaviors labeled as Performance are:

1. Evaluative– Negative– Neutral– Positive

2. Multidimensional– Many different kinds of behaviors– Advance or hinder organizational goals

Page 99: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Behaviors are Not alwaysBehaviors are Not always

– Observable– Measurable

Page 100: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Results/Consequences may be usedResults/Consequences may be used

– To infer behavior– As proxy for behavioral measure

Page 101: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Determinants of PerformanceDeterminants of Performance

Performance =

Declarative Knowledge

X

Procedural Knowledge

X

Motivation

Page 102: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

A. Declarative KnowledgeA. Declarative Knowledge

• Information about– Facts – Labels– Principles– Goals

• Understanding of task requirements

Page 103: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

B. Procedural KnowledgeB. Procedural Knowledge

• Knowing– What to do– How to do it

• Skills– Cognitive– Physical– Perceptual– Motor– Interpersonal

Page 104: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

C. MotivationC. Motivation

• Choices– Expenditure of effort– Level of effort– Persistence of effort

Page 105: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Implications for Addressing Implications for Addressing Performance ProblemsPerformance Problems

• Managers need information to accurately identify source(s) of performance problems

• Performance management systems must– Measure performance

AND– Provide information on SOURCE(s) of problems

Page 106: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Factors Influencing Determinants of Factors Influencing Determinants of Performance:Performance:

• Individual characteristics– Procedural knowledge– Declarative knowledge– Motivation

• HR practices• Work environment

Page 107: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Dimensions:Performance Dimensions:Types of multi-dimensional behaviors:Types of multi-dimensional behaviors:

• Task performance• Contextual performance

– Pro-social behaviors– Organizational citizenship

Page 108: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Task performanceTask performance

Activities that • transform raw materials • help with the transformation process

– Replenishing– Distributing– Supporting

Page 109: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Contextual performanceContextual performance

Behaviors that • contribute to organization’s effectiveness

and• provide a good environment in which task

performance can occur

Page 110: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Differences Between Differences Between Task and Contextual PerformanceTask and Contextual Performance

• Task Performance• Varies across jobs• Likely to be role

prescribed• Influenced by

• Abilities• Skills

• Contextual Performance• Fairly similar across jobs• Not likely to be role

prescribed• Influenced by

• Personality

Page 111: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Why Include Task & Contextual Why Include Task & Contextual Performance Dimensions in PM system?Performance Dimensions in PM system?

1. Global competition2. Teamwork3. Customer service 4. Supervisor views

Page 112: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Job Performance in ContextJob Performance in Context

A performer(individual or

team)

In a given situation

Engages in certain

behaviors

That produce various results

TRAIT BEHAVIOR RESULTS

Page 113: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Approaches to Measuring PerformanceApproaches to Measuring Performance

• Trait Approach– Emphasizes individual traits of employees

• Behavior Approach– Emphasizes how employees do the job

• Results Approach– Emphasizes what employees produce

Page 114: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Trait ApproachTrait Approach

• Emphasis on individual• Evaluate stable traits

• Cognitive abilities• Personality

• Based on relationship between traits & performance

Page 115: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Trait Approach (continued)Trait Approach (continued)

• Appropriate if• Structural changes planned for organization

• Disadvantages• Improvement not under individual’s control• Trait may not lead to

• Desired behaviors or • Desired results

Page 116: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Behavior ApproachBehavior Approach

Appropriate if• Employees take a long time to achieve

desired outcomes• Link between behaviors and results is not

obvious• Outcomes occur in the distant future• Poor results are due to causes beyond the

performer’s controlNot appropriate if • above conditions are not present

Page 117: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Results ApproachResults Approach

Advantages:• Less time • Lower cost • Data appear objective

Page 118: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Results Approach (continued)Results Approach (continued)

Most appropriate when:• Workers skilled in necessary behaviors• Behaviors and results obviously related• Consistent improvement in results over time• Many ways to do the job right

Page 119: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 5CHAPTER 5

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 120: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Defining Performance and Choosing a Defining Performance and Choosing a Measurement Approach: OverviewMeasurement Approach: Overview

Defining PerformanceDeterminants of PerformancePerformance DimensionsApproaches to Measuring Performance

Page 121: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Defining Performance Defining Performance

Performance is:• Behavior• What employees do

Page 122: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Defining PerformanceDefining Performance

Performance is NOT:• Results or Outcomes• What employees produce

Page 123: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Behaviors labeled as Performance are:Behaviors labeled as Performance are:

1. Evaluative– Negative– Neutral– Positive

2. Multidimensional– Many different kinds of behaviors– Advance or hinder organizational goals

Page 124: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Behaviors are Not alwaysBehaviors are Not always

– Observable– Measurable

Page 125: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Results/Consequences may be usedResults/Consequences may be used

– To infer behavior– As proxy for behavioral measure

Page 126: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Determinants of PerformanceDeterminants of Performance

Performance =

Declarative Knowledge

X

Procedural Knowledge

X

Motivation

Page 127: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

A. Declarative KnowledgeA. Declarative Knowledge

• Information about– Facts – Labels– Principles– Goals

• Understanding of task requirements

Page 128: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

B. Procedural KnowledgeB. Procedural Knowledge

• Knowing– What to do– How to do it

• Skills– Cognitive– Physical– Perceptual– Motor– Interpersonal

Page 129: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

C. MotivationC. Motivation

• Choices– Expenditure of effort– Level of effort– Persistence of effort

Page 130: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Implications for Addressing Implications for Addressing Performance ProblemsPerformance Problems

• Managers need information to accurately identify source(s) of performance problems

• Performance management systems must– Measure performance

AND– Provide information on SOURCE(s) of problems

Page 131: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Factors Influencing Determinants of Factors Influencing Determinants of Performance:Performance:

• Individual characteristics– Procedural knowledge– Declarative knowledge– Motivation

• HR practices• Work environment

Page 132: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Dimensions:Performance Dimensions:Types of multi-dimensional behaviors:Types of multi-dimensional behaviors:

• Task performance• Contextual performance

– Pro-social behaviors– Organizational citizenship

Page 133: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Task performanceTask performance

Activities that • transform raw materials • help with the transformation process

– Replenishing– Distributing– Supporting

Page 134: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Contextual performanceContextual performance

Behaviors that • contribute to organization’s effectiveness

and• provide a good environment in which task

performance can occur

Page 135: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Differences Between Differences Between Task and Contextual PerformanceTask and Contextual Performance

• Task Performance• Varies across jobs• Likely to be role

prescribed• Influenced by

• Abilities• Skills

• Contextual Performance• Fairly similar across jobs• Not likely to be role

prescribed• Influenced by

• Personality

Page 136: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Why Include Task & Contextual Why Include Task & Contextual Performance Dimensions in PM system?Performance Dimensions in PM system?

1. Global competition2. Teamwork3. Customer service 4. Supervisor views

Page 137: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Job Performance in ContextJob Performance in Context

A performer(individual or

team)

In a given situation

Engages in certain

behaviors

That produce various results

TRAIT BEHAVIOR RESULTS

Page 138: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Approaches to Measuring PerformanceApproaches to Measuring Performance

• Trait Approach– Emphasizes individual traits of employees

• Behavior Approach– Emphasizes how employees do the job

• Results Approach– Emphasizes what employees produce

Page 139: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Trait ApproachTrait Approach

• Emphasis on individual• Evaluate stable traits

• Cognitive abilities• Personality

• Based on relationship between traits & performance

Page 140: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Trait Approach (continued)Trait Approach (continued)

• Appropriate if• Structural changes planned for organization

• Disadvantages• Improvement not under individual’s control• Trait may not lead to

• Desired behaviors or • Desired results

Page 141: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Behavior ApproachBehavior Approach

Appropriate if• Employees take a long time to achieve

desired outcomes• Link between behaviors and results is not

obvious• Outcomes occur in the distant future• Poor results are due to causes beyond the

performer’s controlNot appropriate if • above conditions are not present

Page 142: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Results ApproachResults Approach

Advantages:• Less time • Lower cost • Data appear objective

Page 143: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Results Approach (continued)Results Approach (continued)

Most appropriate when:• Workers skilled in necessary behaviors• Behaviors and results obviously related• Consistent improvement in results over time• Many ways to do the job right

Page 144: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 6CHAPTER 6

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 145: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Gathering Performance Information:Gathering Performance Information:OverviewOverview

• Appraisal Forms• Characteristics of Appraisal Forms• Determining Overall Rating• Appraisal Period and Number of Meetings• Who Should Provide Performance Information?• A Model of Rater Motivation• Preventing Rating Distortion through Rater Training

Programs

Page 146: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Major Components of Appraisal FormsMajor Components of Appraisal Forms (1)(1)

• Basic Employee Information

• Accountabilities, Objectives, and Standards

• Competencies and Indicators

• Major Achievements and Contributions

• Stakeholder Input

• Employee Comments

• Signatures

Page 147: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Major Components of Appraisal Forms (2) Major Components of Appraisal Forms (2) (could (could

be included in a separate form)be included in a separate form)

• Developmental Achievements• Developmental

– Needs – Plans– Goals

Page 148: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Desirable Features for All Appraisal FormsDesirable Features for All Appraisal Forms

• Simplicity• Relevancy• Descriptiveness• Adaptability

• Comprehensiveness• Definitional Clarity• Communication• Time Orientation

Page 149: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Determining Overall RatingDetermining Overall Rating

• Judgmental strategy

• Mechanical strategy

Page 150: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Appraisal periodAppraisal period

Number of Meetings• Annual • Semi-annual • Quarterly

Page 151: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

When Review Is CompletedWhen Review Is Completed

• Anniversary date– Supervisor doesn’t have to fill out forms at same time– Can’t tie rewards to fiscal year

• Fiscal year– Rewards tied to fiscal year– Goals tied to corporate goals– May be burden to supervisor, depending on

implementation

Page 152: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

6 Types of Formal6 Types of Formal Meetings Meetings (can be combined)(can be combined)

• System Inauguration• Self-Appraisal• Classical Performance Review• Merit/Salary Review• Development Plan• Objective Setting

Page 153: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Who Should Provide Performance Who Should Provide Performance Information?Information?

Employees should be involved in selecting• Which sources evaluate• Which performance dimensions

When employees are actively involved• Higher acceptance of results• Perception that system is fair

Page 154: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Who Should Provide Performance Information?Who Should Provide Performance Information?

Direct knowledge of employee performance• Supervisors• Peers• Subordinates• Self• Customers

Page 155: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

SupervisorsSupervisors

• Advantages– Best position to evaluate performance vs. strategic

goals– Make decisions about rewards

• Disadvantages– Supervisor may not be able to directly observe

performance– Evaluations may be biased

Page 156: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

PeersPeers

• Advantages– Assess teamwork

• Disadvantages– Possible friendship bias– May be less discriminating

Page 157: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

SubordinatesSubordinates

• Advantages– Accurate when used for developmental purposes– Good position to assess some competencies

• Disadvantages– Inflated when used for administrative purposes– May fear retaliation (confidentiality is key)

Page 158: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

SelfSelf

• Advantages– Increased acceptance of decisions– Decreased defensiveness during appraisal interview– Good position to track activities during review period

• Disadvantages– May be more lenient and biased

Page 159: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Customers (external and internal)Customers (external and internal)

• Advantages– Employees become more focused on meeting

customer expectations• Disadvantages

– Time– Money

Page 160: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Disagreement Across SourcesDisagreement Across Sources

• Expect disagreement• Ensure employee receives feedback by

source• Assign differential weights to scores by

source, depending on importance

Page 161: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Types of Rating ErrorsTypes of Rating Errors

• Intentional errors– Rating inflation– Rating deflation

• Unintentional errors– Due to complexity of task

Page 162: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

Expected Positive and Negative Consequences of

Rating Accuracy

Probability of Experiencing Positive & Negative

Consequences

Expected Positive and Negative Consequences of

Rating Distortion

Probability of Experiencing Positive & Negative

Consequences

Motivation to Provide Accurate Ratings

Motivation to Distort Ratings 

Rating Behavior

A Model of A Model of RaterRater Motivation Motivation

Page 163: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Motivations for Rating InflationMotivations for Rating Inflation

• Maximize merit raise/rewards• Encourage employees• Avoid creating written record• Avoid confrontation with employees• Promote undesired employees out of unit• Make manager look good to his/her supervisor

Page 164: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Motivations for Rating DeflationMotivations for Rating Deflation

• Shock employees• Teach a lesson• Send a message to employee • Build a written record of poor performance

Page 165: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Prevent Rating Distortion through Prevent Rating Distortion through

Rater Training ProgramsRater Training Programs

Page 166: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Rater Training Programs should cover:Rater Training Programs should cover:

• Information• Motivation• Identifying, observing, recording and

evaluating performance• How to interact with employees when they

receive performance information

Page 167: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Information - how the system worksInformation - how the system works

• Reasons for implementing the performance management system

• Information on the appraisal form and system mechanics

Page 168: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Motivation – What’s in it for me?Motivation – What’s in it for me?

• Benefits of providing accurate ratings• Tools for providing accurate ratings

Page 169: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Identifying, observing, recording, and evaluating Identifying, observing, recording, and evaluating performanceperformance

• How to identify and rank job activities• How to observe, record, measure

performance• How to minimize rating errors

Page 170: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

How to interact with employees How to interact with employees when they receive performance informationwhen they receive performance information

• How to conduct an appraisal interview• How to train, counsel, and coach

Page 171: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 7CHAPTER 7

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 172: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Implementing a Performance Implementing a Performance Management System: OverviewManagement System: Overview

• Preparation• Communication Plan• Appeals Process• Training Programs• Pilot Testing• Ongoing Monitoring and Evaluation

Page 173: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

PreparationPreparation

• Need to gain system buy-in through:– Communication plan regarding

Performance Management system• Including appeals process

– Training programs for raters– Pilot testing system

• Ongoing monitoring and evaluation

Page 174: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Communication Plan answers:Communication Plan answers:

• What is Performance Management (PM)?• How does PM fit in our strategy?• What’s in it for me?• How does it work?• What are our roles and responsibilities?• How does PM relate to other initiatives?

Page 175: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Cognitive Biases that affect Cognitive Biases that affect communications effectiveness communications effectiveness

• Selective exposure• Selective perception• Selective retention

Page 176: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

To minimize effects of cognitive biases:To minimize effects of cognitive biases:

A. Consider employees:• Involve employees in system design• Show how employee needs are met

Page 177: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

To minimize effects of cognitive biases:To minimize effects of cognitive biases:

B. Emphasize the positive• Use credible communicators• Strike first – create positive attitude• Provide facts and conclusions

Page 178: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

To minimize effects of cognitive biases:To minimize effects of cognitive biases:

C. Repeat, document, be consistent• Put it in writing• Use multiple channels of communication• Say it, and then – say it again

Page 179: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Appeals ProcessAppeals Process

• Promote Employee buy-in to PM system– Amicable/Non-retaliatory – Resolution of disagreements

Page 180: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Appeals ProcessAppeals Process

• Employees can question two types of issue:– Judgmental

• (validity of evaluation)

– Administrative• (whether policies and procedures were followed)

Page 181: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Appeals ProcessAppeals Process

• Level 1– HR reviews facts, policies, procedures– HR reports to supervisor/employee– HR attempts to negotiate settlement

• Level 2– Arbitrator (panel of peers and managers) and/or– High-level manager – final decision

Page 182: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Rater Training ProgramsRater Training Programs

• Content Areas to include– Information– Identifying, Observing, Recording, Evaluating– How to Interact with Employees

• Choices of Training Programs to implement– RET– FOR– BO– SL

Page 183: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

ContentContent

A. Information - how the system works– Reasons for implementing the

performance management system– Information

• the appraisal form• system mechanics

Page 184: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

ContentContent

B. Identifying, observing, recording, and evaluating performance– How to identify and rank job activities– How to observe, record, and measure

performance– How to minimize rating errors

Page 185: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

ContentContent

C. How to interact with employees when they receive performance information– How to conduct an appraisal interview– How to train, counsel, and coach

Page 186: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Choices of Training ProgramsChoices of Training Programs

• Rater Error Training (RET)• Frame of Reference Training (FOR)• Behavioral Observation Training (BO)• Self-leadership Training (SL)

Page 187: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Rater Error Training (RET)Rater Error Training (RET)

• Goals of Rater Error Training (RET)– Make raters aware of types of rating errors– Help raters minimize errors– Increase rating accuracy

Page 188: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Intentional rating errorsIntentional rating errors

• Leniency (inflation)• Severity (deflation)• Central tendency

Page 189: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Unintentional rating errorsUnintentional rating errors

• Similar to Me• Halo• Primacy • First impression• Contrast

• Stereotype• Negativity• Recency• Spillover

Page 190: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Possible Solutions for Types of Rating ErrorsPossible Solutions for Types of Rating Errors

• Intentional– Focus on motivation– Demonstrate benefits of providing accurate

ratings• Unintentional

– Alert raters to different errors and their causes

Page 191: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Frame of Reference Training (FOR)Frame of Reference Training (FOR)

• Goal of Frame of Reference Training (FOR)*– Raters develop common frame of reference

• Observing performance• Evaluating performance

*Most appropriate when PM appraisal system focuses on behaviors

Page 192: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Expected Results of Frame of Reference Training (FOR) Expected Results of Frame of Reference Training (FOR)

• Raters provide consistent, more accurate ratings

• Raters help employees design effective development plans

Page 193: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Behavioral Observation Training (BO)Behavioral Observation Training (BO)

• Goals of Behavioral Observation Training (BO)– Minimize unintentional rating errors– Improve rater skills by focusing on how

raters:• Observe performance• Store information about performance• Recall information about performance• Use information about performance

Page 194: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Self-leadership Training (SL)Self-leadership Training (SL)

• Goals of Self-leadership Training (SL)– Improve rater confidence in ability to

manage performance– Enhance mental processes– Increase self-efficacy

Page 195: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Pilot TestingPilot Testing

• Provides ability to – Discover potential problems– Fix them

Page 196: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Pilot Testing - benefitsPilot Testing - benefits

• Gain information from potential participants• Learn about difficulties/obstacles• Collect recommendations on how to improve • Understand personal reactions• Get early buy-in • Get higher rate of acceptance

Page 197: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Implementing a Pilot TestImplementing a Pilot Test

• Roll out test version with sample group– Staff and jobs generalizable to organization

• Fully implement planned system– All participants keep records of issues encountered– Do not record appraisal scores– Collect input from all participants

Page 198: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Ongoing Monitoring and EvaluationOngoing Monitoring and Evaluation

• When system is implemented, decide:– How to evaluate system effectiveness– How to measure implementation– How to measure results

Page 199: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Evaluation data to collect:Evaluation data to collect:

• Reactions to the system• Assessments of requirements

– Operational– Technical

• Effectiveness of performance ratings

Page 200: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Indicators to considerIndicators to consider

• Number of individuals evaluated• Distribution of performance ratings• Quality of information• Quality of performance discussion meetings• System satisfaction• Cost/benefit ratio• Unit-level and organization-level performance

Page 201: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 8CHAPTER 8

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 202: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management and Performance Management and Employee Development: OverviewEmployee Development: Overview

• Personal Developmental Plans• Direct Supervisor’s Role• 360-degree Feedback Systems

Page 203: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Stakeholders in the Development ProcessStakeholders in the Development Process

• Employees – Help plan their own development– Improve their own performance

• Managers– Help guide the process of development – Support success of process

Page 204: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Personal Personal DevelopmentalDevelopmental Plans Plans

• Specify actions necessary to improve performance

• Highlight employee’s – Strengths– Areas in need of development

Page 205: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Personal Developmental Plans answer:Personal Developmental Plans answer:

• How can I continuously learn and grow in the next year?

• How can I do better in the future?• How can I avoid performance problems

of the past?

Page 206: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Personal Developmental Plans:Personal Developmental Plans:OverviewOverview

• Developmental Plan Objectives• Content of Developmental Plan• Developmental Activities

Page 207: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Overall Developmental Plan ObjectivesOverall Developmental Plan Objectives

• Encourage:– Continuous learning– Performance improvement– Personal growth

Page 208: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Specific Developmental Plan ObjectivesSpecific Developmental Plan Objectives

• Improve performance in current job• Sustain performance in current job• Prepare employee for advancement• Enrich employee’s work experience

Page 209: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Content of Developmental PlanContent of Developmental Plan

• Developmental objectives– New skills or knowledge– Timeline

• How the new skills or knowledge will be acquired– Resources– Strategies

• Standards and measures used to assess achievement of objectives

Page 210: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Content of Developmental PlanContent of Developmental Plan

• Based on needs of organization and employee• Chosen by employee and direct supervisor• Taking into account

– Employee’s learning preferences– Developmental objective in question– Organization’s available resources

Page 211: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Developmental Activities Developmental Activities ‘On the job’‘On the job’

• On-the-job-training• Mentoring• Job rotation• Temporary assignments

Page 212: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Developmental ActivitiesDevelopmental ActivitiesIn addition to ‘on the job’In addition to ‘on the job’

• Courses• Self-guided reading• Getting a degree• Attending a conference• Membership or leadership role

– in professional or trade organization

Page 213: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Direct Supervisor’s Role:Direct Supervisor’s Role:

• Explain what is necessary • Refer employee to appropriate

developmental activities • Review & make suggestions regarding

developmental objectives

Page 214: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Direct Supervisor’s Role (ongoing):Direct Supervisor’s Role (ongoing):

• Check on employee’s progress • Provide motivational reinforcement

Page 215: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

360-degree Feedback Systems360-degree Feedback Systems

Tools to help employees

• Improve performance by using • Performance information • Gathered from many sources

– Superiors– Peers– Customers– Subordinates– The employee

Page 216: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

360-degree Feedback Systems360-degree Feedback Systems

• Anonymous feedback• Most useful when used

– For DEVELOPMENT – NOT for administrative purposes

• Internet used for collecting data

Page 217: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 218: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 219: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 220: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 221: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Necessary organizational norms include:Necessary organizational norms include:

• Cooperation• Openness and trust• Input and participation valued• Fairness

Page 222: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Overview of 360-degree Feedback SystemsOverview of 360-degree Feedback Systems

• Advantages of 360-degree Feedback Systems• Risks of 360-degree Feedback Systems• Characteristics of a Good 360-degree

Feedback System

Page 223: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Advantages of 360-degree Feedback SystemsAdvantages of 360-degree Feedback Systems

• Decreased possibility of biases• Increased awareness of expectations• Increased commitment to improve• Improved self-perception of performance• Improved performance• Reduction of ‘undiscussables’• Increased employee control of their own careers

Page 224: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Risks of 360-degree Feedback SystemsRisks of 360-degree Feedback Systems

• Unconstructive negative feedback hurts.• Are individuals comfortable with the system?

User acceptance is crucial.• If few raters, anonymity is compromised.• Raters may become overloaded.• Stock values may drop.

Page 225: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Characteristics of a Good 360-degree Feedback SystemCharacteristics of a Good 360-degree Feedback System

• Anonymity• Observation of employee

performance• Avoidance of survey

fatigue• Raters are trained

• Used for developmental purposes only

• Emphasis on behaviors• Raters go beyond ratings• Feedback interpretation• Follow-up

Page 226: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 9CHAPTER 9

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 227: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management Skills:Performance Management Skills:OverviewOverview

• Coaching• Coaching Styles• Coaching Process• Performance Review Meetings

Page 228: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Coaching: DefinitionCoaching: Definition

• Manager – Interacts with employee and– Takes active role and interest in performance

• Collaborative ongoing process– Directing employee behavior– Motivating employee behavior– Rewarding employee behavior

• Concerned with long-term performance

Page 229: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Major Coaching Functions:Major Coaching Functions:

• Give advice• Provide guidance• Provide support• Give confidence• Promote greater competence

Page 230: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Key Coaching Behaviors Key Coaching Behaviors

• Establish developmental objectives• Communicate effectively• Motivate employees• Document performance• Give feedback• Diagnose performance problems• Develop employees

Page 231: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

The Good Coach QuestionnaireThe Good Coach Questionnaire

Do you listen to your employees? Do you understand their individual needs? Do you encourage employees to express

their feelings openly? Do you give tangible and intangible support

for development? Do your employees know your expectations

about their performance?

Page 232: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

The Good Coach Questionnaire (continued)The Good Coach Questionnaire (continued)

Do you encourage open and honest discussions and problem solving?

Do you help your employees create action plans that will

Solve problems?Create changes?

Do you help your employees explore potential areas of

Growth?Development?

Page 233: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Coaching StylesCoaching Styles

More Assertive Less assertive

Task & Fact oriented Driver Analyzer

People oriented Persuader Amiable

Page 234: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Adaptive coaches use all stylesAdaptive coaches use all stylesaccording to employee needs:according to employee needs:

• Sometimes providing direction• Sometimes persuading• Sometimes showing empathy• Sometimes paying close attention to rules and

established procedures

Page 235: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Set Developmenta

l Goals

Identify Developmental Resources &

Strategies

Implement strategies

Observe and Document

Developmental Behavior

Give Feedback

Coaching ProcessCoaching Process

Page 236: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Coaching Process:Coaching Process:Steps covered in Chapter 8Steps covered in Chapter 8

• Set Developmental Goals• Identify Resources and Strategies

Needed to Implement Developmental Goals

• Implement Developmental Goals

Page 237: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Coaching Process:Coaching Process: Overview of remaining stepsOverview of remaining steps

• Observe and Document Developmental Behavior and Outcomes

• Give Feedback– Praise– Negative Feedback

Page 238: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Observe and Document Developmental Behavior Observe and Document Developmental Behavior and Outcomesand Outcomes

Constraints:• Time• Situation• Activity

Page 239: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Organizational Activities Organizational Activities to improve documentation of performanceto improve documentation of performance

• Good communication plan to get manager buy-in• Training programs

– Rater error training– Frame-of-reference training– Behavioral observation training– Self-leadership training

Page 240: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Reasons to document performanceReasons to document performance

• Minimize cognitive load• Create trust• Plan for the future• Legal protection

Page 241: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Recommendations for DocumentationRecommendations for Documentation

• Be specific• Use adjectives and adverbs sparingly• Balance positives with negatives• Focus on job-related information• Be comprehensive• Standardize procedures• Describe observable behavior

Page 242: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Giving FeedbackGiving Feedback

• Main purposes:– Help build confidence– Develop competence– Enhance involvement– Improve future performance

Page 243: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Potential costs of failing to provide feedback:Potential costs of failing to provide feedback:

• Employees are deprived of chance to improve their own performance

• Chronic poor performance• Employees have inaccurate perceptions of

how their performance is regarded by others

Page 244: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

To be effective, feedback should:To be effective, feedback should:

• Be timely• Be frequent• Be specific• Be verifiable• Be consistent (over time and across employees)• Be given privately• Provide context and consequences

(continued next slide)

Page 245: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

To be effective, feedback should:To be effective, feedback should: (continued)(continued)

• Describe first, evaluate second• Cover the continuum of performance• Identify patterns• Demonstrate confidence in employee• Allow for both advice and idea generation

Page 246: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Guidelines for Giving PraiseGuidelines for Giving Praise

• Be sincere – only give praise when it is deserved

• Give praise about specific behaviors or results• Take your time• Be comfortable with act of praising• Emphasize the positive

Page 247: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Giving Negative FeedbackGiving Negative Feedback

Managers avoid giving negative feedback due to:• Negative reactions and consequences• Negative experiences in the past• Playing “god”• Need for irrefutable and conclusive evidence

Page 248: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Negative feedback is most useful when it:Negative feedback is most useful when it:

• Identifies warning signs and performance problem is still manageable

• Clarifies unwanted behaviors and consequences

• Focuses on behaviors that can be changed• Comes from a credible source• Is supported by data

Page 249: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Feedback Sessions should always answer:Feedback Sessions should always answer:

• How is your job going?• What can be done to make it better?

– Job– Product– Services

• How can you better serve your customers?– Internal– External

Page 250: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Supervisory roles in managing performanceSupervisory roles in managing performance

• Judge– Evaluate performance– Allocate rewards

• Coach– Help employee solve performance problems– Identify performance weaknesses– Design developmental plans

Page 251: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Review Formal MeetingsPerformance Review Formal Meetings

Possible types of formal meetings:1. System Inauguration2. Self-Appraisal3. Classical Performance Review4. Merit/Salary Review5. Developmental Plan6. Objective Setting

Page 252: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Steps to take before meeting:Steps to take before meeting:

• Give at least 2-weeks notice• Block sufficient time• Arrange to meet in a private location without

interruptions

Page 253: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Merged Performance Review MeetingMerged Performance Review MeetingComponentsComponents

1. Explanation of meeting purpose2. Employee self-appraisal3. Supervisor & employee share rating and rationale4. Developmental discussion5. Employee summary6. Rewards discussion7. Follow-up meeting arrangement8. Approval and appeals process discussion9. Final recap

Page 254: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Possible defensive behaviors of employeesPossible defensive behaviors of employees

• Fight response– Blaming others– Staring at supervisor– Raising voice– Other aggressive responses

• Flight response– Looking/turning away– Speaking softly– Continually changing the subject– Quickly agreeing without basis– Other passive responses

Page 255: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

To prevent/reduce defensive behaviorsTo prevent/reduce defensive behaviors

• Establish and maintain rapport• Be empathetic• Observe verbal and nonverbal cues• Minimize threats• Encourage participation

Page 256: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

When defensiveness is unavoidable:When defensiveness is unavoidable:

Recognize itAllow its expression

If situation becomes intolerableReschedule the meeting for a later time

Page 257: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 10CHAPTER 10

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 258: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Reward Systems and Legal IssuesReward Systems and Legal IssuesOverviewOverview

• Reward Systems• Legal Issues

Page 259: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Reward Systems: OverviewReward Systems: Overview

• Traditional and Contingent Pay (CP) Plans– Reasons for Introducing CP Plans– Possible Problems Associated with CP– Selecting a CP Plan

• Putting Pay in Context• Pay Structures

Page 260: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Traditional PayTraditional Pay

• Salary and salary increases are based on– Position– Seniority

Page 261: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Contingent Pay (CP)Contingent Pay (CP)

• Salary and salary increases are based on– Job performance

• Also called: Pay for Performance• If not added to base pay, called:

– Variable pay

Page 262: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Reasons for Introducing CPReasons for Introducing CP

• Performance management is more effective when rewards are tied to results

• CP Plans force organizations to:– Clearly define effective performance– Determine what factors are necessary

• CP plans help to recruit and retain top performers• CP plans project good corporate image

Page 263: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

CP plans help improve motivation when:CP plans help improve motivation when:

• Employees see clear link between their efforts and resulting performance (Expectancy)

• Employees see clear link between their performance level and rewards received (Instrumentality)

• Employees value the rewards available (Valence)

motivation = expectancy x instrumentality x valence

Page 264: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Possible Problems Associated with CPPossible Problems Associated with CP

• Poor performance management system• Rewarding counterproductive behavior• Insignificant rewards• The reward becomes the driver • Extrinsic vs. intrinsic motivation• Disproportionately large rewards for executives

Page 265: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Selecting a CP Plan: Issues to considerSelecting a CP Plan: Issues to consider

A. Culture of organizationB. Strategic direction of organization

Page 266: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

A. Culture of organization: A. Culture of organization: Types of organizationsTypes of organizations

• Traditional– Top-down decision making– Vertical communication– Jobs that are clearly defined

• Involvement– Shared decision making– Lateral communications– Loosely defined roles

Page 267: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

CP systems for different organizational cultures:CP systems for different organizational cultures:

• Traditional organizations– Piece rate– Sales commissions– Group incentives

• Involvement organizations– Profit sharing– Skill-based pay

Page 268: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

B: CP Plans to enhance Strategic Directions:B: CP Plans to enhance Strategic Directions:

• Employee development– Skill based pay

• Customer service– Competency based pay– Gainsharing

• Overall Profit– Executive pay– Profit or stock sharing

• Productivity– Individual

• Piece rate• Sales commissions

– Group• Gainsharing• Group incentives

• Teamwork– Team sales commissions– Gainsharing– Competency based pay

Page 269: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Putting Pay in ContextPutting Pay in Context

A reward increases the chance that• Specific behaviors and results will be repeated, or• Employee will engage in new behavior and

produce better results

Page 270: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Rewards can include:Rewards can include:

• Pay• Recognition

– Public– Private– Status

• Time

• Trust & Respect• Challenge• Responsibility• Freedom• Relationships

Page 271: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

How to Make Rewards WorkHow to Make Rewards Work

• Define and measure performance first and then allocate rewards

• Only use rewards that are available• Make sure all employees are eligible• Rewards should be both

– Financial– Non-financial

(continued)

Page 272: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

How to Make Rewards Work How to Make Rewards Work (continued)(continued)

• Rewards should be:– Visible– Contingent– Timely– Reversible

Page 273: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Pay StructuresPay Structures

• Job Evaluation• Broad-banding

Page 274: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Pay structuresPay structures

An organization’s pay structureClassifies jobs

Into categoriesBased on their relative worth

Is designed by job evaluation methods

Page 275: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Job evaluationJob evaluation

• Method of data collection– Determine the worth of various jobs to– Create a pay structure

• Consideration of – KSAs required for each job– Value of job for organization– How much other organizations pay

Page 276: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Types of job evaluation methods:Types of job evaluation methods:

• Ranking• Classification• Point

Page 277: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Job evaluation methods: Job evaluation methods: RankingRanking

• Create job descriptions• Compare job descriptions • Rank jobs

Page 278: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Advantages of using Ranking methodAdvantages of using Ranking method

• Requires little time• Minimal effort needed for administration

Page 279: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Disadvantages of using Ranking methodDisadvantages of using Ranking method

• Criteria for ranking may not be clear:• Distances between each rank may not

be equal

Page 280: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Job evaluation methods: Job evaluation methods: ClassificationClassification

• A series of classes or grades are created• Each job is placed within a job class

Page 281: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Advantages of using Classification methodAdvantages of using Classification method

• Jobs can be quickly slotted into structure• Employees accept method because it seems

valid

Page 282: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Disadvantages of using Classification methodDisadvantages of using Classification method

• Requires extensive time and effort for administration

• Differences between classification levels may not be equal

Page 283: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Job evaluation methods:Job evaluation methods: Point method Point method

• Identify compensable factors (job characteristics)• Scale factors (e.g. on a scale of 1 – 5)• Assign a weight to each factor so the sum of the

weights for all factors = 100%

Page 284: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Advantages of using Point methodAdvantages of using Point method

• Establish worth of each job relative to all other jobs within organization

• Comprehensive measurement of relative worth of each job in organization

• Easy to rank jobs when total points are known for each job

Page 285: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Disadvantages of using Point methodDisadvantages of using Point method

• Requires extensive administrative– Time– Effort

Page 286: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Does job evaluation method matter?Does job evaluation method matter?

– Fairness– Evaluators

• Impartial• Objective

Page 287: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Compensation surveysCompensation surveys

• Information on– Base pay– All other types of compensation

• Conducted in-house or by consultants, such as:www.salary.com or www.haypaynet.com

Page 288: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Broad-banding:Broad-banding:

Pay structure collapses job classes into fewer categories

Advantages:• Provides flexibility in rewarding people• Reflects changes in organization structure• Provides better base for rewarding growth in

competence• Gives more responsibility for pay decisions to

managers• Provides better basis for rewarding career progression

Page 289: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Reward Systems: SummaryReward Systems: Summary

• Traditional and Contingent Pay (CP) Plans– Reasons for Introducing CP Plans– Possible Problems Associated with CP– Selecting a CP Plan

• Putting Pay in Context• Pay Structures

Page 290: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Legal Issues: OverviewLegal Issues: Overview

• Performance Management and the Law• Some Legal Principles Affecting PM• Laws Affecting PM

Page 291: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management and the LawPerformance Management and the Law

• Performance management systems are legally sound, if they are fair:– Procedures are standardized– Same procedures are used with all employees

Page 292: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Some Legal Principles Affecting PM:Some Legal Principles Affecting PM:OverviewOverview

• Employment-at-will• Negligence• Defamation• Misrepresentation• Adverse Impact• Illegal Discrimination

Page 293: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Employment-at-willEmployment-at-will

• Employment relationship can be ended at any time by– Employer– Employee

• Exceptions– Implied contract– Possible violation of legal rights

Page 294: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

NegligenceNegligence

• If organization documents describe a systemand• It is Not implemented as described,• Employee can challenge evaluation,

charging negligence

Page 295: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

DefamationDefamation

• Disclosure of performance information that is– Untrue and– Unfavorable

Page 296: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

MisrepresentationMisrepresentation

• Disclosure of performance information that is– Untrue and– Favorable

Page 297: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Adverse Impact / Unintentional DiscriminationAdverse Impact / Unintentional Discrimination

• PM system has unintentional impact on a protected class

• Organization must demonstrate:– Specific KSA is a business requirement for the job– All affected employees are evaluated in the same way

• Organization should review ongoing performance score data by protected class to implement corrective action as necessary

Page 298: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Illegal Discrimination or Disparate TreatmentIllegal Discrimination or Disparate Treatment

• Raters assign different scores to employees based on factors that are NOT related to performance

• Employees receive different treatment as result of such ratings

• Employees can claim they were intentionally and illegally treated differently due to their status

Page 299: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Employee claim of illegal discrimination:Employee claim of illegal discrimination:

• Direct evidence of discrimination, or• Evidence regarding the following:

– Membership in protected class– Adverse employment decision– Performance level deserved reward/different

treatment– How others were treated (not in protected class)

Page 300: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Employer response to claim of illegal discriminationEmployer response to claim of illegal discrimination

• Legitimate and non-discriminatory reason for action• Related to performance

• Note: Good performance management system and subsequent performance-related decision, used consistently with all employees, provides defense

Page 301: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Laws Affecting PM:Laws Affecting PM:

During past few decades, several countries have passed laws prohibiting discrimination based on:•Race or Ethnicity•Sex•Religion•National Origin•Age•Disability status•Sexual orientation

Page 302: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Laws in the United Kingdom:Laws in the United Kingdom:

• Equal Pay Act of 1970• Race Relations Act of 1976• Sex Discrimination Act of 1975• Disability Discrimination Act of 1995• Employment Equality (Sexual Orientation)

Regulations 2003• Employment Equality (Religion or Belief)

Regulations 2003

Page 303: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Laws in the United States of AmericaLaws in the United States of America

• Equal Pay Act of 1963• Civil Rights Act of 1964• Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967

(as amended in 1986)• Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990

Page 304: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Characteristics of Legally Sound PM SystemsCharacteristics of Legally Sound PM Systems

• Organization:– The system is formally explained and communicated to all

employees – The system includes a formal appeals process – Procedures are standardized and uniform for all employees

within a job group – The system includes procedures to detect potentially

discriminatory effects or biases and abuses in the system

Page 305: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Characteristics of Legally Sound PM SystemsCharacteristics of Legally Sound PM Systems

• Management– Supervisors are provided with formal training and information

on how to manage the performance of their employees – Performance information is gathered from multiple, diverse,

and unbiased raters – The system includes thorough and consistent documentation

including specific examples of performance based on first-hand knowledge

Page 306: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Characteristics of Legally Sound PM SystemsCharacteristics of Legally Sound PM Systems

• Employees– Performance dimensions and standards are:

• Clearly defined and explained to the employee, • Job-related, and • Within the control of the employee

– Employees are given • Timely information on performance deficiencies and • Opportunities to correct them

– Employees are given a voice in the review process and treated with courtesy and civility throughout the process

Page 307: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Legal Issues: SummaryLegal Issues: Summary

• Performance Management and the Law• Some Legal Principles Affecting PM• Laws Affecting PM

Page 308: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver

CHAPTER 11CHAPTER 11

Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Page 309: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Managing Team Performance:Managing Team Performance:OverviewOverview

• Definition and Importance of Teams• Types of Teams and Implications for PM• Purposes and Challenges of Team PM• Including Team Performance in the PM

System• Rewarding Team Performance

Page 310: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Definition of TeamDefinition of Team

Two or more people – Interact

• Dynamically• Independently

– Share common and valued• Goal, Objective or Mission

Page 311: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Importance of TeamsImportance of Teams

• Global pressures• Flexibility in flatter organizations• Complexity of products and services• Rapidly changing environments

Page 312: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management & TeamsPerformance Management & Teams

• PM systems should target:– Individual performance– Individual’s contribution to team performance– Performance of entire team

Page 313: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

General principles of PM relating to teamsGeneral principles of PM relating to teams

1. Design and implement best possible system2. Consider dangers of poorly implemented

system

Page 314: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Managing for Improved Team PerformanceManaging for Improved Team Performance

• Don’t limit team processes with other task or organizational requirements

• Provide good team design and organizational support

• Give feedback only on processes that the team members can control

Page 315: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Types of TeamsTypes of Teams

• Classified by– Complexity of task– Membership configuration

Page 316: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Complexity of Task ranges from:Complexity of Task ranges from:

• Routine– Well defined– Few deviations in how work is done– Outcomes easily assessed

- to -• Non-routine

– Not defined well– No clear specifications on how to do the work– Outcomes are long term and difficult to assess

Page 317: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Membership Configuration includesMembership Configuration includes

• Length of time team expects to work together• Stability of team membership

Static Dynamic

Page 318: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Types of Teams Based on Types of Teams Based on Membership Configuration and Task ComplexityMembership Configuration and Task Complexity

Dynamic ° Network

Teams Membership Configuration

° Project Teams

Static ° Work and

Service Teams

Routine Non-Routine Task Complexity

Page 319: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Types of TeamsTypes of Teams

• Work or Service Teams• Project Teams• Network Teams

Page 320: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Work or Service TeamsWork or Service Teams

• Intact • Routine tasks• Share similar skill sets

Page 321: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Project TeamsProject Teams

• Assembled for specific purpose• Tasks outside core product or service • Members from different functional areas

Page 322: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Network TeamsNetwork Teams

• Membership not constrained by – Time or space– Organizational boundaries

• Teams may include– Temporary or full-time workers– Customers– Vendors– Consultants

• Work is extremely non-routine

Page 323: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Examples of PM Approaches by Type of TeamExamples of PM Approaches by Type of Team

• Type of Team– Work & Service Team

– Project Team

– Network Team

• Type of PM Approach– Peer ratings

– Ongoing measurements

– Development of competencies

Page 324: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Purposes of Team PMPurposes of Team PM

• Traditional goals of any PM System• Specific to Team performance:

– Make all team members accountable– Motivate all team members to have a stake in team

performance

Page 325: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Challenges of Team PMChallenges of Team PM

• How do we assess relative individual contribution?

• How do we balance individual and team performance?

• How do we identify individual and team measures of performance?

Page 326: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Including Team Performance in the PM SystemIncluding Team Performance in the PM System

• Prerequisites• Performance Planning• Performance Execution• Performance Assessment• Performance Review• Performance Renewal and Re-Contracting

Page 327: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Management ProcessPerformance Management Process

Performance Review

Performance Renewal and Re-contracting

Performance Assessment

Performance Execution

Performance PlanningPrerequisites

Page 328: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

PrerequisitesPrerequisites

• Knowledge of mission– Organization– Team

• Knowledge of job to be performed by the team

Page 329: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance PlanningPerformance Planning

• Results expected of the team• Behaviors expected of team members• Developmental objectives to be achieved by

team and its members

Page 330: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance ExecutionPerformance Execution

Team responsibilities1. Commit to goal achievement2. Seek feedback from

• Each other• Supervisor

3. Communicate openly & regularly4. Conduct regular & realistic peer-

appraisals

Page 331: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance ExecutionPerformance Execution

Supervisor responsibilities1. Observe and document

• Team performance• Relative contribution of team members

2. Update team on any changes in goals of the organization

3. Provide resources & reinforcement

Page 332: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance AssessmentPerformance Assessment

Types of Assessments• Self-appraisals• Peer evaluations• Supervisor evaluation• Outsider appraisals (if appropriate)

Page 333: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance AssessmentPerformance Assessment

Kinds of Performance to be Assessed• Individual task performance• Individual contextual performance• Team performance

Page 334: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Dimensions of Team Performance to assess:Dimensions of Team Performance to assess:

• Effectiveness• Efficiency• Learning and growth• Team member satisfaction

Page 335: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance ReviewPerformance Review

• Two meetings with supervisor or review board– Team meeting– Individual meeting

• Emphasis on past, present and future

Page 336: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Team meetingTeam meeting

• Discuss overall team – Performance– Results

• Information comes from:– Team members– Other teams/outsiders– Supervisor’s evaluation

Page 337: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Individual meetingIndividual meeting

• Discuss how individual behavior contributed to team performance

• Information comes from:– Self-appraisal– Peer ratings– Supervisor’s evaluation

Page 338: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Performance Renewal and Re-ContractingPerformance Renewal and Re-Contracting

• Make adjustments to performance plan• Include plan for individual performance as it

affects team functioning

Page 339: PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at Denver PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Herman Aguinis Prentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Herman Aguinis, University of Colorado at DenverPrentice Hall, Inc. © 2006

Making Team-based Rewards EffectiveMaking Team-based Rewards Effective

• All employees should be eligible• Rewards should be

– Visible– Contingent– Reversible

• Avoid factors which cause reward systems to fail

• Consider variable pay systems (in addition to individual bonuses)