Upload
belay-aga
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
1/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 1
FFFAFACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
MSC.IN SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ENGINEERING
LABORATORY REPORT ON SOLAR BOX COOKER
SUBMITTED TO: Dr.A.VENKATA RAMAYA
AND ATO BALEWGIZE AMARE
BY: BELAY AGA
ID No: Msc.00278/2003 DATE: 12/12/2011
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
2/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 2
Experiment 4 performance test on solar cooker with augmentative
reflectors
Experimental setup
H=0.495m
L=0.495m
Where DMM is the digital multimetre to measure the mv reading of the thermocouple in the
can and DT is the digital thermometer to measure the chamber temperature
Collector area
Chamber
Can with
waterDT
DMM
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
3/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 3
Objectives of the experimentTo test the efficiency of the box solar cooker
To predict the temperature of water in the can with time
To predict the temperature of the chamber with time
Materials used for the experimentAluiminium can
Thermocouple
Digital thermometer
Infrared thermometer
Black body
1.5 litres of water
Parameters to be measuredChamber temperature
Water trmperature
Solar insolation
Mass flowrate of air
Cooking power of the solar cooker
Theory
Introduction
The use of solar energy to cook food presents a viable alternative to the use of fuelwood,
kerosene, and other fuels traditionally used in developing countries for the purpose of
preparing food. While certainly, solar cookers cannot entirely halt the use of combustible fuels
for food preparation, it can be shown that properly applied, solar cooking can be used as an
effective mitigation tool with regards to global climate change, deforestation, and economic
debasement of the worlds poorest people.
Types of solar cookers
A survey of solar cookers worldwide shows that a wide variety of cookers have been designed.
However, the available designs of solar cooker fall into four main categories namely, the solar
box cookers or popularly known as solar ovens, panel cookers, collector cookers and
concentrating or reflector cookers. The feature common to each design is the shiny reflective
surface that directs the suns rays onto the cooking area and dark inner walls of the cooking
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
4/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 4
area and cooking vessel. Each type of solar cooker has advantages when compared on their
cooking ability, ease of construction, and safety of use.
The solar box cooker or solar oven is the most common type of solar cooker made for personal
use. It consists largely of a box made of insulating material with one face of the box fit ted with a
transparent medium, such as glass or plastic.
The panel cooker is quite similar in operation to the solar box cooker. The same principles are
employed but instead of an insulated box only, the panel cooker typically relies on large (often
multi-faceted) reflective panels, which focus the sunlight on a cooking vessel. The collector
cooker is made up of two parts that often share a single casing: a collector for gathering heat
and a cooking part for exploiting the yield. A typical collector cooker would consist of a flat
plate solar collector, side and head mirrors, and the cooker part. The user is not affected by
radiation and heat as the cooking part is separate and protected from radiation. Oil is used as
the heat transfer medium in order to allow higher temperatures to be reached. Theconcentrating solar cooker or reflector cooker utilizes the principles of concentrating optics. It
concentrates direct solar radiation on the bottom of the cooking pot, heating the pot in a
fashion similar to a traditional electric or gas powered stove.
Calibration of the thermocouple
Table 1.calibration data for thermocouple
voltage(mv) T(oC)
0.5 400.8 45
1 50
1.2 55
1.4 60
1.7 65
2.1 70
2.4 75
2.6 80
2.8 85
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
5/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 5
Figure 1 J-type thermocouple calibration
Sample calculations
Area of the collector
0.495*0.495=0.245025m2
Cookers shall have 7,000 grams potable water per square meter from standard testing
=7kg/m2=7litre
7lit=1m2
Xlit=0.245m2
X=.
=1.715lit
Mass of water taken to be tested =1.5kg=1.5litre
Solar insolation calculation
T = 18.90*(mv) + 31.30R = 0.992
010
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Temperatureindegreecelcius
mv reading
Temperature vs mv reading for the J type
thermocouple
T(deg.C)
Linear (T(deg.C))
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
6/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 6
Radiat ion component (Grad)
Boltzmann constant () =5.67*(10-8) w/m2. k4,=1(for black body)
G radiation= (Ts4-Tsky4) where Ts and Tsky are in Kelvin
Table 2.data for the radiation components of insolation
Tsur(k) Tsky(K) Grad(w/ m2)
343.725 290.5644 387.2977833
344.85 291.1408 394.4943069
343.875 288.9815 397.4156314
341.025 295.4753 334.6976664
346.275 295.7651 381.3256008
343.125 301.5795 316.9269647
345.375 292.1503 393.709034353.025 291.5733 470.8514043
352.425 293.5944 453.3982464
348.15 292.872 415.8547253
348.825 292.4389 424.7960172
353.925 293.1609 470.8675418
354.525 291.5733 485.9146195
355.5 290.4204 502.2516626
354.9 289.7007 500.1370566
351.75 291.4291 459.007763
351.225 294.0281 439.0510212
345.975 294.1727 387.7727212
347.925 292.1503 417.8004718
345.825 291.5733 401.1753476
343.35 294.0281 364.231161
Average 419
Convection component (Gconv)
From Heat transfer_A practical Approach_Yunus A.Cengel , for natural convection
Rayleigh number (Ral) =()()^
^*pr
Where the
g = gravitational acceleration, m/ s2
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
7/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 7
=Coefficient of volume expansion, 1/K (= 1/T for ideal gases)
Ts = temperature of the surface, C
Tamb= temperature of the fluid sufficiently far from the surface, C
Lc= characteristic length of the geometry, m
= kinematic viscosity of the fluid, m2/s
Pr =prandtl number
The air properties are taken at the fluid temperature (average of the ambient and surface
temperature)
Tf=(Ts+Tamb)/2
Table 3. Temperature reading of chamber and water
Tsurf
(oC)
Tchamber
(oC)
T water(mv) Twater
(oC)
Tamb
(oC)
94.1 59.7 0.3 36.97 29.6
95.6 63.2 0.4 38.86 30
94.3 62.7 0.5 40.75 28.5
90.5 63.1 0.6 42.64 33
97.5 66.6 0.65 43.585 33.2
93.3 69 0.7 44.53 37.2
96.3 70.4 0.8 46.42 30.7
106.5 71.3 0.9 48.31 30.3
105.7 72.2 1 50.2 31.7
100 72.4 1.15 53.035 31.2
100.9 72.8 1.2 53.98 30.9
107.7 73.3 1.3 55.87 31.4
108.5 73.5 1.35 56.815 30.3
109.8 72.4 1.45 58.705 29.5
109 72.9 1.5 59.65 29
104.8 80 1.55 60.595 30.2104.1 81.2 1.6 61.54 32
97.1 80.7 1.65 62.485 32.1
99.7 80.2 1.7 63.43 30.7
96.9 78.7 1.9 67.21 30.3
93.6 81.3 1.95 68.155 32
Twater=18.90*(mv) +31.30 from the calibration of the thermocouple
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
8/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 8
Figure 2 temperature profiles for the chamber and water with time from 11:40am to 3:00pm
Lc=As/P where As is surface area,P is perimeter of the plate
The plate is 8cm*8cm
As=0.08*0.08=6.4*10-3m2, P=4*0.08m=0.32m,
Lc= (6.4* 10-3m2)/ (0.32m) =0.02m.
g=9.81m/s2
For the Horizontal plate, (Upper surface of a hot plate or lower surface of a cold plate)
For RaL=104107 =1.45*104 Nu=0.54RaL
0.25=0.54*(15400)0.25=5.92
Nu=
=5.92=
.
., h=8.23w/m2.k
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0 5 10 15 20 25
Temperature(degreecelcius)
time of the day from 11:40am to 3:00pm respectively
Chamber temperature and water
temperature
T chamber
Twater
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
9/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 9
Table 4. Convective component of the solar insolation with the respective time
Taver
age(oC)
Kg/m3
(N.s/m2)
(m2
/ s)
(1/K)
pr
(w/ m.k)
Ra Nu h
(w/k.m2)
Gconv(w
/ m2)
Gtotal(w
/ m2)
50.08
75
0.88
9
1.97E
-05
2.22E
-05
0.003
1
0.7
13
0.027
8
1.45E
+04
5.92E
+00
8.23E
+00
337.3475
689
724.6453
522
50.85
0.88
7
1.97E
-05
2.22E
-05
0.003
09
0.7
13
0.027
9
1.46E
+04
5.94E
+00
8.28E
+00
345.3969
386
739.8912
455
49.61
25
0.89 1.97E
-05
2.21E
-05
0.003
1
0.7
13
0.027
8
1.49E
+04
5.97E
+00
8.30E
+00
350.4572
733
747.8729
047
50.43
75
0.88
8
1.97E
-05
2.22E
-05
0.003
1
0.7
13
0.027
8
1.23E
+04
5.69E
+00
7.90E
+00
275.6304
885
610.3281
548
53.16
25
0.88
1
1.98E
-05
2.25E
-05
0.003
07
0.7
13
0.028 1.36E
+04
5.83E
+00
8.16E
+00
325.8217
227
707.1473
23553.58
75
0.87
9
1.98E
-05
2.25E
-05
0.003
07
0.7
13
0.028
1
1.11E
+04
5.54E
+00
7.79E
+00
255.2154
882
572.1424
53
51.46
25
0.88
5
1.97E
-05
2.23E
-05
0.003
09
0.7
13
0.027
9
1.45E
+04
5.92E
+00
8.26E
+00
343.1984
297
736.9074
637
55.08
75
0.87
5
1.99E
-05
2.27E
-05
0.003
05
0.7
13
0.028
2
1.64E
+04
6.11E
+00
8.61E
+00
426.8800
466
897.7314
509
55.48
75
0.87
4
1.99E
-05
2.28E
-05
0.003
05
0.7
13
0.028
2
1.57E
+04
6.04E
+00
8.52E
+00
405.2309
78
858.6292
244
53.1
0.88
1
1.98E
-05
2.25E
-05
0.003
07
0.7
13
0.028 1.49E
+04
5.97E
+00
8.35E
+00
365.8192
185
781.6739
438
53.2875
0.88 1.98E-05
2.25E-05
0.00307
0.713
0.028 1.52E+04
6.00E+00
8.39E+00
375.8129615
800.6089787
56.08
75
0.87
3
2.00E
-05
2.29E
-05
0.003
04
0.7
13
0.028
2
1.60E
+04
6.07E
+00
8.56E
+00
422.8335
207
893.7010
625
55.83
75
0.87
3
2.00E
-05
2.29E
-05
0.003
04
0.7
13
0.028
2
1.66E
+04
6.13E
+00
8.64E
+00
441.1090
749
927.0236
944
55.92
5
0.87
3
2.00E
-05
2.29E
-05
0.003
04
0.7
13
0.028
2
1.71E
+04
6.18E
+00
8.71E
+00
460.3538
325
962.6054
95
55.37
5
0.87
5
1.99E
-05
2.27E
-05
0.003
05
0.7
13
0.028
2
1.74E
+04
6.20E
+00
8.75E
+00
461.3234
504
961.4605
07
54.4
0.87
7
1.99E
-05
2.27E
-05
0.003
06
0.7
13
0.028
1
1.61E
+04
6.08E
+00
8.55E
+00
413.6114
304
872.6191
93455.03
75
0.87
6
1.99E
-05
2.27E
-05
0.003
05
0.7
13
0.028
1
1.52E
+04
6.00E
+00
8.43E
+00
388.3867
181
827.4377
393
52.46
25
0.88
3
1.98E
-05
2.24E
-05
0.003
08
0.7
13
0.028 1.40E
+04
5.87E
+00
8.22E
+00
334.6537
752
722.4264
964
52.73
75
0.88
2
1.98E
-05
2.24E
-05
0.003
07
0.7
13
0.028 1.50E
+04
5.98E
+00
8.37E
+00
368.9016
681
786.7021
4
51.48 0.88 1.98E 2.24E 0.003 0.7 0.027 1.46E 5.94E 8.29E 351.1121 752.2875
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
10/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 10
75 5 -05 -05 09 13 9 +04 +00 +00 818 295
51.1
0.88
6
1.97E
-05
2.22E
-05
0.003
06
0.7
13
0.027
9
1.32E
+04
5.79E
+00
8.08E
+00
308.6195
308
672.8506
918
Average
788.4139
545
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
11/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 11
Figure 3 solar insolation with time of the day
Gconv average =369.415w/ m2
= +=369.415+419=788.415w/m2
=0.245m2
Input power
=*=0.245*788.415=193.162watt
Output power
= ( )
Where =4186J/kg.K
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 5 10 15 20 25
solarinsolation(w/m2)
time inhrs from 11:40am to 3:00pm respectively with 10 minutes interval
Gtotal(w/m2)
Gtotal(w/m2)
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
12/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 12
=3:00pm-11:40am=3:20h=3.33hour
=.
(..)
.=16.33watt
Efficiency ( ) =
100% =.
..*100%=8.454%
Cooking power for the 10minute interval
=( )
=.(..)
=19.78watt
=
=.
.=19.10617watt
=-=39.97-29.6=7.37oC
Table 5. Instant cooking power and standard cooking power relations
P (watt) Pi(watt) Twater(oC) Tamb(oC) Td(oC) Gtotal(w/m2)
19.10617 19.77885 36.97 29.6 7.37 724.6453522
18.71247 19.77885 38.86 30 8.86 739.8912455
18.51276 19.77885 40.75 28.5 12.25 747.8729047
11.34242 9.889425 42.64 33 9.64 610.3281548
9.78947 9.889425 43.585 33.2 10.385 707.1473235
24.19886 19.77885 44.53 37.2 7.33 572.14245318.78824 19.77885 46.42 30.7 15.72 736.9074637
15.42242 19.77885 48.31 30.3 18.01 897.7314509
24.18715 29.66827 50.2 31.7 18.5 858.6292244
8.856119 9.889425 53.035 31.2 21.835 781.6739438
17.29333 19.77885 53.98 30.9 23.08 800.6089787
7.745988 9.889425 55.87 31.4 24.47 893.7010625
14.9351 19.77885 56.815 30.3 26.515 927.0236944
7.191521 9.889425 58.705 29.5 29.205 962.605495
7.200085 9.889425 59.65 29 30.65 961.460507
7.933125 9.889425 60.595 30.2 30.395 872.6191934
8.366306 9.889425 61.54 32 29.54 827.4377393
9.582425 9.889425 62.485 32.1 30.385 722.4264964
35.19806 39.5577 63.43 30.7 32.73 786.70214
9.202063 9.889425 67.21 30.3 36.91 752.2875295
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
13/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 13
Arranging the temperature difference and the standardized cooking power, the following plot is attained
Figure 2 standardized cooking power with respect to the temperature difference
Ps = -0.230* Td + 19.55
R = 0.087
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
standardcookingpower(watt)
Temperature difference (degree celcius)
Ps vs Td
Ps
Linear (Ps
7/31/2019 Performance Test on Solar Cooker With Augmentative Reflectors
14/14
Performance test on solar cooker wi th augmentative reflectors
By Belay Aga MSc 00278/ 2003 December, 2011 Page 14
Conclusion
From the table above the temperature rise of the chamber has rapid response than that of the
water temperature as expected .the water temperature increases smoothly and that of the
chamber oscillates in increasing and decreasing. The plot of the standardized cooking power
with respect to the temperature difference is not like that of the standard tool because of thelow number of data and less change of water temperature.in an interval of 2.33hrs,the water
temperature rises by 31.185oC by the average solar insolation of 788.415w/ m2 by the collector
area of 0.245m2. By this data the efficiency of the solar box cooker is 8.454 %