2
Performance Trends in Insulating Glass DOE Requires Glass Certification In 2008 the Department of Energy moved to require insulating glass certification for all glass used in Energy Star labeled fenestration products. The National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) accepted this challenge and effective July 1, 2008 required Insulating Glass (IG) certification in accordance with NFRC 706. Insulating Glass Certification (IGC) programs are recognized by NFRC and administered by the Certification Policy Committee (CPC). IGC programs must meet the requirements of ISO Guide 65 or ISO 9001, use laboratories accredited to ISO 17025, and to test and verify compliance to ASTM E2190 (or CGSB 12.8) at least one time every two years. Industry Impacted by Higher Failure Rates The following combination of factors resulted in an immediate increase in IG failures: -First time exposure to the rigors of ASTM E2190 performance testing by manufacturers of IG. -More challenging testing requirements of ASTM E2190 in comparison to previous ASTM E773/E774 standard which expired in 2002. -Increased use of higher performance glazing bringing with it more coated glass, more high performance spacer systems, more internal components, more triple glaze units, etc. September 2013 Gas filled testing, which requires a minimum of 90% initial gas content retention and 80% gas content retention after E2190 testing, has tripled in quantity since 2008, contributing to the complexity of IG systems and increasing risk of not meeting the requirements of E2190. Factors Contributing to Variability in Insulating Glass Performance Five IGC programs are recognized by NFRC. The included chart shows wide variability in the various certification programs. Insulating Glass Failure Rates from 2001 to 2012 Failure rates increased nearly 60% between 2008 and 2009. 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 % of Sample Submied Increasing Percentage of Gas Filled Units Submitted for Testing IGC Comparison Chart Not all insulating glass certification programs are created equal. 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 % Failure Rate Fog Seal Gas Seal/Fog Seal/Gas REQUIREMENTS IGC #1 IGC #2 IGC #3 IGC #4 IGC #5 ISO 9001 Guide 65 Cerfy to E2190 CGSB 12.8 Board of governors Witness sample fabricaon

Performance Trends in Insulating Glass Informational Bulletin 66.pdf · Insulating Glass Certi˜cation (IGC) programs m are recognized by NFRC and administered by the Certi˜cation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Performance Trends in Insulating Glass Informational Bulletin 66.pdf · Insulating Glass Certi˜cation (IGC) programs m are recognized by NFRC and administered by the Certi˜cation

Performance Trends in Insulating GlassDOE Requires Glass CertificationIn 2008 the Department of Energy moved to require insulating glass certi�cation for all glass used in Energy Star labeled fenestration products. The National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) accepted this challenge and e�ective July 1, 2008 required Insulating Glass (IG) certi�cation in accordance with NFRC 706. Insulating Glass Certi�cation (IGC) programs are recognized by NFRC and administered by the Certi�cation Policy Committee (CPC). IGC programs must meet the requirements of ISO Guide 65 or ISO 9001, use laboratories accredited to ISO 17025, and to test and verify compliance to ASTM E2190 (or CGSB 12.8) at least one time every two years.

Industry Impacted by Higher Failure RatesThe following combination of factors resulted in an immediate increase in IG failures:

-First time exposure to the rigors of ASTM E2190 performance testing by manufacturers of IG.-More challenging testing requirements of ASTM E2190 in comparison to previous ASTM E773/E774 standard which expired in 2002.-Increased use of higher performance glazing bringing with it more coated glass, more high performance spacer systems, more internal components, more triple glaze units, etc.

September 2013

Gas �lled testing, which requires a minimum of 90% initial gas content retention and 80% gas content retention after E2190 testing, has tripled in quantity since 2008, contributing to the complexity of IG systems and increasing risk of not meeting the requirements of E2190.

Factors Contributing to Variability in Insulating Glass PerformanceFive IGC programs are recognized by NFRC. The included chart shows wide variability in the various certi�cation programs.

Insulating Glass Failure Rates from 2001 to 2012

Failure rates increased nearly 60% between 2008 and 2009.

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

% o

f Sam

ple

Subm

itted

Increasing Percentage of Gas Filled Units Submitted for Testing

IGC Comparison Chart

Not all insulating glass certi�cation programs are created equal.

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

% F

ailu

re R

ate

Fog

Seal

Gas

Seal/FogSeal/Gas

REQUIREMENTS IGC #1 IGC #2 IGC #3 IGC #4 IGC #5

ISO 9001 √ √ √ √ √

Guide 65 √ √ √

Certify to E2190 √ √ √ √

CGSB 12.8 √

Board of governors √

Witness sample fabrication √ √ √

Page 2: Performance Trends in Insulating Glass Informational Bulletin 66.pdf · Insulating Glass Certi˜cation (IGC) programs m are recognized by NFRC and administered by the Certi˜cation

September 2013

-Even the tests used to comply with NFRC 706 are vastly di�erent. CGSB 12.8, recognized in Canada, is completely di�erent than ASTM E2190. Which test is more severe, CGSB 12.8 or ASTM E2190? When considered in their entirety most experts will agree that E2190 is a more severe test.

-Based on our review of over 3,000 data points our research shows a wide variance in a given spacer/sealant system's ability to pass the E2190 test.

SummaryThe pre-2002 method of IG testing (ASTM E773/E774) had provisions for progressive levels of IG performance: Level C, Level CB, and Level CBA. ASTM E2190, contains all the provisions of CBA level plus a more challenging volatile fog test. Combine this with the NFRC mandate and the resulting increased failure rate should not be a surprise. Because IG is so instrumental in the energy e�ciency of fenestration products we should not expect the pressure for superior performance of IG systems to be relaxed any time soon. It is imperative that the industry promote and develop systems that meet the ever more robust requirements of the market we serve.

717.764.7700 . [email protected] . www.archtest.com

Dan Braun has over 22 years of experience with the industry with expertise in building component and fenestration product testing. He is responsible for regional laboratories and o�ces throughout the United States and is a member of IGCC and WDMA Technical Committees.

About The Author Dan Braun - Senior Vice President, Architectural Testing

Variability in Spacer / Sealant Systems

This chart shows signi�cant variability in the risk of failure between spacer/sealant systems.

About ATIFounded in 1975, Architectural Testing, Inc. (ATI) is a leading ISO/IEC 17025 accredited building products testing laboratory providing more than 2000 de�ned test protocols at one or more of its �fteen full-service laboratories. Architectural Testing o�ers a Complete Solution for evaluation, testing and certi�cation.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P

% Fa

ilure

Rate

Spacer / Sealant Systems