57
©2012 MFMER | 3200268v3(2010)-1 Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restriction Jae K. Oh, MD ASE Board Review 2017

Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

  • Upload
    docong

  • View
    219

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2012 MFMER | 3200268v3(2010)-1

Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restriction

Jae K. Oh, MD ASE Board Review 2017

Page 2: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-2

Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases

• Constriction vs Restriction

• Typical Constriction

• Effusive CP

• Transient CP

• CP and Tricuspid Regurgitation

• Multi-modality Imaging

• Cases

• Tamponade

Page 3: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-3 ©2011

MFME

R |

slide-3

Restriction vs Constriction Paradoxical DHF or HFpEF

CP983059-3

No paradoxical Pulse Paradoxical

No variation Diastolic Filling Variation

Decreased Relaxation (e’) Paradoxical

Inspiration HV reversal Expiration

Concordant LV/RV SP Discordant

Diagnosis should be based on their characteristic

HEMODYNAMICS

Page 4: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-4

Mayo Echo Diagnostic Criteria

Septal motion abnormality MV Flow Velocity

Restrictive (E/A >1)

Hepatic Vein Diastolic

reversal with expiration

Sensitivity 87 %

Specificity 91 %

Welch et al Circ Imaging 2014

Medial e’ ≥ 8 cm/s

Page 5: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-5

©2011

MFMER |

slide-5

80

0

40

LV

PCW

Expiration Inspiration

CP1105201-1

Hatle et al. Circ 1989

Hemodynamics of Myocardial Disease Concordant change in PCWP and LVDP

Inspiration

Page 6: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-6

Constrictive Pericarditis

CP992397-39

E

E

1.Dissociation between intrathoracic and

intracardiac pressures

2. Interventricular Dependence

Mitral Inflow vs Cath

Page 7: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-7

Hemodynamics in Constriction

CP1051850-19

Intracardiac pressure Δ < intrathoracic pressure Δ

Interventricular dependence

Page 8: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-8

Constriction Abnormal septal motion

Interventricular Dependence

Inspir Expir

“Consider constriction if there is

septal motion abnormality in patients

with HF and preserved EF (HFpEF)”

Page 9: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-9

Mitral Annulus Tissue Velocity Constriction vs Myocardial Disease

Sa

Ea Aa

Medial

Lateral

Normal

“ Mitral medial annulus velocity ≥ 8 cm/s

suggests CP in pts with HF and normal EF”

Page 10: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-10

©2011

MFME

R |

slide-

10

Normal vs RCM vs CP Medial Mitral e’ velocity

Medial e’ 13 cm/s Medial e’ 3 cm/s Medial e’ 14 cm/s

Normal RCM CP

Page 11: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-11

Illustrative Cases

Page 12: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-12

27 yo man with fatigue and dyspnea

• Sep. 2015…Flu-like symptoms, treated with

inhaler

• Oct. 2015…Pre-syncopy and palpitation

• Pericardial rub

• Pericardial effusion on Echo

• Treated with Ibuprofen 2400 mg/d, Colchicine 0.6 mg BID

• Not feeling better and CRP 60

• Underwent pericardial window

Page 13: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-13

27 year old man underwent a window Referred to Mayo

• Pericardial fluid …studies were negative

• Not feeling better

• RUQ abdominal pain and fatigue

• U/S…Enlarged gallbladder and liver

Page 14: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-14

Page 15: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-15

27 yo man after pericardial window

1= CT 2= MRI 3= Cath 4= Pericardiectomy

Hepatic Vein

Expiratory Diastolic

Flow Reversal

Mitral Inflow

Mitral e’ = 15 cm/sec

Page 16: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-16

71 yo man with RUQ discomfort and dyspnea 2 years after CABG

• Physical Examination

• JVP elevation

• Prominent S3

• Peripheral edema

• CT was obtained: Calcified Pericardium

Page 17: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-17

71 yo man with calcified pericardium Referred for Pericardiectomy

• Cardiac Cath

• Normal Coronaries

• Elevated RAP, RVEDP, LVEDP Equalized LV/RV EDP

Page 18: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-18

71 year old man with calcified pericardium Referred for Pericardiectomy

Lateral

Mitral inflow

E= 0.8 A= 0.2

What would you do next?

1= Pericardiectomy

2= HF Medical Rx

3= Myocardial Biopsy

4= MRI

Medial e’ = 3 cm/s

Lateral e’ = 4 cm/s

Page 19: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-19

71 year old man with calcified pericardium

MRI : Patchy myocardial delayed

enhancement and increased wall thickness

Cardiac Amyloidosis

Page 20: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-20

Constriction vs Restriction Traditional Hemodynamic Diagnostic parameters

-10

0

10

20

30

CP RMD

LV

ED

P-R

VE

DP

(mm

Hg

)

Talreja et al: J Am Coll Cardiol 51:315, 2008

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

CP RMDLV

RF

W (

mm

Hg

)

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

CP RMD

RV

ED

P/P

AS

P

(mm

Hg

)

20

40

60

80

CP RMD

PA

SP

(m

m H

g)

Page 21: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-21

Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era Novel Criteria for Diagnosis in the Cardiac Cath Laboratory (Talreja, Nishimura, Oh, Holmes. Jan. 2008 JACC)

Constriction Restriction(RMC)

Concordant change

Discordant change

Page 22: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-22

An e-mail from a junior staff at a major MC 52 year old man waiting for heart transplantation (Had Echo, MRI, and cardiac cath performed)

Medial e’ = 20 cm/sec

Diastolic Reversal

Flow with Expiration

Dx= RCM

Page 23: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-23

. What would you recommend?

1. Being a junior staff, keep quiet

2. Believing in Echo-Doppler, un-list him and further evaluation

3. Proceed with transplantation

Page 24: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-24

Explanted Heart

Page 25: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-25

77 yo man with severe aortic stenosis TAVR and PM implantation

Page 26: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-26

77 yo man with severe aortic stenosis TAVR and PM implantation & RV Perforation

Pericardiocentesis yielded 125 cc of

bloody fluid

Page 27: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-27

77 yo man with severe aortic stenosis Increasing dyspnea 2 months after pericardiocentesis

Page 28: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-28

Effusive-Constrictive Pericarditis

Interventricular Dependence

Expiratory diastolic flow reversal

Page 29: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-29

©2011

MFMER |

slide-29

MRI DE in 2 patients with Constriction

Circulation Oct 3rd 2011

Baseline

Medical

RX

3 Months

Page 30: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-30

©2011

MFMER |

slide-30

One week of Steroid Rx Transient Constrictive Pericarditis

Page 31: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-31

©2011

MFMER |

slide-31

Transient Constriction Reversible (N=14) Persistent (N=15)

Age 54 ± 17 59 ± 16

LVEF 57 ± 3 60 ± 3

E’ (cm/sec) 12 ± 1 11 ± 1

Steroid Rx 71 % 53 %

Pericardium 3.8 ± 0.6 mm 4.0 ± 0.6 mm

DE Pericardium 4.4 ± 0.4 mm 2.1 ± 0.4mm

Grade 3-4/4 DE 93 % 33 %

Sed rate 45 to 4 25 to 20

CRP 75 to 2 14 to 15

Page 32: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-32

35 yo man presents with dyspnea and fever BP 80/40 mmHg

Page 33: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-33

Welles-04-07.mov

Echo guided Pericardiocentesis

18% 3%

Chest wall

79%

Subcostal Location

Page 34: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-34

35 yo man with tamponade and fever TEE after pericardiocentesis

Page 35: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-35

Heart failure with ascites and leg edema

©2011

MFMER |

slide-35

1= Severe TR

2=Constriction

3= TR + CP

4= TR and RV dysfunction

Page 36: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-36

Annulus Reversus Severe TR and CP

©2011

MFMER |

slide-36

Medial e’ = 12 cm/sec Lateral e’= 9 c/sec

Page 37: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-37

Constriction or Myocardial Disease ? Diagnostic Algorithm

Syed, Schaff, Oh Nature Review Sep 2014

Medial e’ 12 cm/s Medial e’ 5 cm/s

Page 38: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-38

In the modern era, multimodality imaging is essential

in the diagnosis and management of pericardial

syndromes. Echocardiography is the initial test for

most pericardial syndromes, including acute

pericarditis,recurrent pericarditis, and CP. CMR and

CT can usually be added when there is complexity not

handled by echocardiography or technically

limited windows or when tissue characterization is

needed, such as with edema and inflammation.

JASE 2013 47 pages

Page 39: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-39

Echocardiography for Pericardial Diseases

Cyst Tamponade Constriction

Page 40: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-40

Cardiac CT for Pericardial Diseases

Absent Pericardium

Page 41: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-41

Cardiac MRI for Pericardial Diseases

Extensive pericardial

enhancement &

adjacent left pleural

Interventricular

Dependence with

typical septal motion

Page 42: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-42

Illustrative Cases

Page 43: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-43

47 year old man

• Chest pain

• Not exertional

• Normal Examination

Page 44: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-44

47 year old man with chest pain Absent pericardium

• Usually left side

• Heart shifted to left

• Mostly asymptomatic

• Strangulation can happen

Page 45: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-45

Congenital Absence of the Pericardium

Snoopy Sign

Page 46: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-46

Pericardial Cyst

Page 47: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-47

A large pericardial cyst

©2011

MFMER |

slide-47

Page 48: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-48

46 year old male smoker presents with chest pain to a local ED

• Chest pain for 5 hours

• Stable and unremarkable examination

• ECG shows ST elevation

• STEMI was activated

PR depression

Page 49: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-49

46 year old man with ? STEMI

MRI with

Delayed

Enhancement

Pericardial

Inflammation

Page 50: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-50

©2011

MFMER |

slide-50

Acute Pericarditis Management Recommendation

• Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) agent for 1 month : ASA (1.5-2 Gr/d), Ibuprofen (2.5-3 Gr/d), Indocin (25-50 mg tid or qid)

• Colchicine for 3 months 0.6 mg twice a day 17 % vs 38 % Recurrence rate

• Avoid steroid if possible

• Avoid vigorous exercise for 1-2 months

Page 51: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-51

American J. Cardiology 1996;78: 251

Baseline 10 minutes of

Bruce protocol

63 yo man with chest pain, normal coronary angiogram, no cardiac

enzyme elevation, elevated ESR, and small pericardial effusion

Page 52: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-52

51 year old with SLE and BP 150/115

Page 53: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-53

57 year old male with STEMI Thrombolysis and Stent

Hypotensive and tachycardic

1. Dopamine

2. IABP

3. Fluid

4. Surgery

Page 54: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-54

57 year old man with STEMI

Hepatic vein diastolic

reversal with expiration

RV Diastolic Collapse

Page 55: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-55

Tamponade Physiology

Pressure

Volume over time

Rapid effusion Slow effusion

Critical

tamponade

Limit of

pericardial

stretch

NEJM 349: 684, 2003

CP1299236-6

Page 56: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-56

66 year old woman with dyspnea Gastro-pericardial fistula

Pneumo-pericardium

Page 57: Pericardial Diseases Constriction vs Restrictionasecho.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/... ·  · 2017-05-01Echo Evaluation of Pericardial Diseases •Constriction vs Restriction

©2016 MFMER | slide-57

Thank you for listening! [email protected]