7/28/2019 Personal Reflection_f1
1/1
Assignment 3 Rubric
CRITERIAFAIL PASS
SatisfactoryCREDIT
Very goodDISTINCTION
ExcellentHIGH DISTINCTION
OutstandingSCORE
Selection ofrelevant academictheories, models &frameworks
fromcourse literature toidentify key issuesof personal
decision makingsituation
No selection ofrelevant theories,models or frameworks;OR
literature used isnot from this course;issues in personaldecision
makingsituation not identified
3.5
Selection of some relevanttheories, models and/orframeworks from
the courseliterature;adequate identification of keyissues in
personal decisionmaking situation
4.8
Selection of thegenerally relevanttheories, models
and/orframeworks from thecourse literature;and a generally
goodidentification of keyissues in personal
decision makingsituation
5.6
Excellent Integration ofa) very relevanttheories, models
and/orframeworks from thecourse literature with b)a clear and
logicalidentification of keyissues in personal
decision makingsituation
6.4
Outstanding Integration ofa) selection of the mostrelevant
theories, modelsand/or frameworks fromthe course literature withb)
an Insightfulidentification of key issuesin personal decision -
making situation7.5
(20%)
8
Application ofrelevant academictheories, modelsand frameworks
toevaluate why theissues of thepersonal decisionmaking
situationarose
Descriptive summaryof the situation, with noanalysis evident;
notheoretical dimensionto the writing.
4.5
Some analysis of why theissues arose, but still
mostlydescriptive; theoreticalsources are described ratherthan
discussed; the linkbetween theory and the caseissues is occasional
and/orsuperficial.
6
A mostly clear analysisof why the issues arose;theoretical
sources arefairly well integrated intothe discussion.
7
A precise analysis ofwhy the issues arose;theoretical sources
arewell synthesised andintegrated into agenerally
criticaldiscussion.
8
A precise, insightfulanalysis of why the issuesarose;
theoretical sourcesare accurately andconcisely synthesised,and
thoughtfullyintegrated into aninsightful criticaldiscussion.
9.5
(25%)
10
Personalreflection,informed bytheory, on how theissue could
havebeen addresseddifferently
No articulatedunderstanding of yourpersonal decisionmaking
processes;OR no link betweentheory and personalunderstanding;
nodiscussion of how youcould have dealt withissues differently.
6.5
Some use of theory toexplain your personaldecision making
processes,but some of the explanationhas no clear
theoreticalfoundation; some use of thisknowledge to discuss howyou
could have dealt with theissues differently; OR someidentification
of differentoutcomes, but inadequatediscussion of how they
could
have been achieved.8.4
Use of generallyrelevant theory toarticulate someunderstanding
of yourpersonal decisionmaking processes;some use of thisknowledge
to discusshow you could havedealt with the issuesdifferently.
9.8
Use of mostly relevanttheory to articulate anunderstanding of
yourpersonal decisionmaking processes; useof this knowledge
todiscuss how you couldhave dealt with theissues differently for
amore effective outcome.
11.2
Use of relevant theory toarticulate an insightfulunderstanding
of yourpersonal decision makingprocesses; use of thisknowledge to
discuss howyou could have dealt withthe issues
differently;recognition of what mighthave been the mosteffective
outcome/s.
13.5
(35%)
14
Clear language,overall structureand correctreferencing
Structure is veryunclear or lacking;poor formatting;inadequate
or mostlyincorrect referencing
3.5
Some section headings, butstructure not always
clear;inconsistent formatting;genuine attempt to reference,but many
errors.
4.8
Adequate sectionheadings; consistentformatting; mostlycorrect
referencing
5.6
Clear section headings& heading hierarchy;excellent
formatting;completely correctreferencing
6.4
Clear, logical sectionheadings & headinghierarchy reflect
thediscussion; outstandingformatting; completelycorrect
referencing
7.5
(20%)
8
Click on the Close button (top right of this window) to return
to the module
