2
Personnel Management and Human Resource Management  are more or less the same thing. In fact Personnel Management is one of the core components of Human Resource Management  . Personnel Management deals with the selection, recruitment, j ob description and work load of an employee. On the other hand, Human Resource Management looks after the broader concept of HR. It deals with Personnel Management as well as Organizational Management, P ersonnel administration, Manpower management, Industrial Management, Organizational Development  and also Personnel training and development. Some experts assert that there is no difference between human resources and personnel management. They state that the two terms can be used interchangeably, with no difference in meaning. In fact, the terms are often used interchangeably in help-wanted ads and job des criptions. For those who recognize a difference between personnel management and human resources, the difference can be described as philosophical. Personnel management is more administrative in nature, dealing with payroll , complying with employment law, and handling related tasks. Human resources, on the other hand, is responsible for managing a workforce as one of the primary resources that contributes to the success of an organization. When a difference between personnel management and human resources is recognized, human resources is described as much broader in s cope than personnel management. Human resources is said to incorporate and develop personnel management tasks, while seeking to create and develop teams of workers for the benefit of the organization. A primary goal of human resources is to enable employees to work to a maximum level of efficiency. Personnel management can include administrative tasks that are both traditional and routine. It can be described as reactive, providing a response to demands and concerns as they are presented. By contrast, human resources involves ongoing strategies to manage and develop an organization's workforce. It is proactive, as it involves the continuous development of functions and policies for the purposes of improving a company's workforce. Personnel management is often considered an independent function of an organization. Human resource management , on the other hand, tends to be an integral part of overall company function. Personnel management is typically the sole responsibility of an org anization's personnel department. With human resources, all of an organization's managers are often involved in some manner, and a chief goal may be to have managers of various departments develop the skill s necessary to handle personnel- related tasks Human resources management and personnel management are often used interchangeably. The differences, if any, between the two are very subtle and more philosophical in nature.

Personnel Management and Human Resource Management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/8/2019 Personnel Management and Human Resource Management

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/personnel-management-and-human-resource-management 1/2

Personnel Management and Human Resource Management  

are more or less the same thing. In fact Personnel Management is one of the core components of 

Human Resource Management  .

Personnel Management deals with the selection, recruitment, job description and work load of an employee. On the other hand, Human Resource Management looks after the broader conceptof HR. It deals with Personnel Management as well as Organizational Management, Personnel

administration, Manpower management, Industrial Management, Organizational Development  and also Personnel training and development.

Some experts assert that there is no difference between human resources and personnel management.

They state that the two terms can be used interchangeably, with no difference in meaning. In fact, the

terms are often used interchangeably in help-wanted ads and job descriptions.

For those who recognize a difference between personnel management and human resources, the

difference can be described as philosophical. Personnel management is more administrative in nature,

dealing with payroll , complying with employment law, and handling related tasks. Human resources, on

the other hand, is responsible for managing a workforce as one of the primary resources that

contributes to the success of an organization.

When a difference between personnel management and human resources is recognized, human

resources is described as much broader in scope than personnel management. Human resources is said

to incorporate and develop personnel management tasks, while seeking to create and develop teams of 

workers for the benefit of the organization. A primary goal of human resources is to enable employees

to work to a maximum level of efficiency.

Personnel management can include administrative tasks that are both traditional and routine. It can be

described as reactive, providing a response to demands and concerns as they are presented. By

contrast, human resources involves ongoing strategies to manage and develop an organization's

workforce. It is proactive, as it involves the continuous development of functions and policies for the

purposes of improving a company's workforce.

Personnel management is often considered an independent function of an organization. Human

resource management , on the other hand, tends to be an integral part of overall company function.

Personnel management is typically the sole responsibility of an organization's personnel department.

With human resources, all of an organization's managers are often involved in some manner, and a chief 

goal may be to have managers of various departments develop the skills necessary to handle personnel-

related tasks

Human resources management and personnel management are often used interchangeably. Thedifferences, if any, between the two are very subtle and more philosophical in nature.

8/8/2019 Personnel Management and Human Resource Management

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/personnel-management-and-human-resource-management 2/2

Personnel management is a more administrative job in nature. It deals with the payroll of thecompany. It is that branch of management that must function in compliance with employment 

laws. The tasks are more of the routine type, in contrast with the broader and more dynamicscope of human resources management.

On the other hand, the human resources management of an organisation is responsible for theoverall management of the workforce in the organisation. The efficiency of the human resourcesmanagement of an organisation in coordinating the activities of the staff is, in fact, one of the

 primary reasons for the success of the most successful corporate houses in the world. Personnelmanagement, in short, is a function of management that has a narrower scope than human

resources management.

According to P. C. Tripathi (2002), Human Resources Development, Sultan Chand & Sons:

1) PM is traditional, routine, maintenance-oriented, administrative function whereas HRD is continuous,

on-going development function aimed at improving human processes.

2) PM is an independent function with independent sub-functions. HRD follows the systems thinkingapproach. It is not considered in isolation from the larger organization and must take into account the

linkages and interfaces.

3) PM is reactive, responding to demands as and when they arise. HRD is proactive, anticipating,

planning and advancing continuously.

4) PM is the exclusive responsibility of the personnel department. HRD is a concern for all managers in

the organization and aims at developing the capabilities of all line managers to carry out the personnel

functions.

5) The scope of PM is relatively narrow with a focus on administering people. The scope of HRD views

the organization as a whole and lays emphasis on building a dynamic culture.

6) Important motivators in PM are compensation, rewards, job simplification and so on. HRD considerswork groups, challenges and creativity on the job as motivators.

7) In PM improved satisfaction is considered to be the cause for improved performance but in HRD it is

the other way round (performance is the cause and satisfaction is the result).