Petroleum Coke - Economics in Cement Kilns

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

petcoke economics

Citation preview

  • Petroleum coke economics in

    cement kilns to 2016

    Kerry Satterthwaite

    23 May 2013

  • Disclaimer

    The statements in this presentation represent the considered views of Roskill

    Information Services Ltd. It includes certain statements that may be deemed

    "forward-looking statements. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical facts, that address future market developments, government

    actions and events, are forward-looking statements. Although Roskill Information

    Services Ltd. believes the outcomes expressed in such forward-looking statements

    are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future

    performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in

    forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ

    materially from those in forward-looking statements include changes in general

    economic, market or business conditions.

    While Roskill Information Services Ltd. has made every reasonable effort to ensure

    the veracity of the information presented it cannot expressly guarantee the accuracy

    and reliability of the estimates, forecasts and conclusions contained herein.

    Accordingly, the statements in the presentation should be used for general guidance

    only.

  • Table of contents

    Cement fuel market

    Role of petroleum coke

    Petroleum coke is a by-product and priced to MOVE

    Delivered petroleum coke price must be less than delivered coal price on a per GJ basis

    How much less? -> delivered prices comparison

    Where are the cement customers? Where are their petroleum coke suppliers?

    Future economics and conclusions

  • Quantifying the cement fuel

    market

  • Quantifying the cement fuel market

    2012:

    Cement production 3,700 Mt

    Assumptions:

    Energy consumption 750-900 kcal/kg clinker

    Energy demand in 2012:

    300Mt of coal equivalent

    % that is alternative (not coal or petroleum coke):

    Still

  • Cement sales by leading producers

    Company Total production capacity

    (Mtpy)

    Total cement sales (Mtpy)

    Anhui Conch 209.0 187.0 1

    Holcim 217.5 148.0

    Lafarge 2 17 .0 1 41 .1

    Heidelberg Cement

    122 .0 89 . 0

    Cemex 94.8 65.8

    Italcementi 74 .0 2 51.1

    2

    Buzzi Unicem 41.6 27.3

    Taiheiyo 38.9 14.6

    Eurocement 39.2 3 30.0

    2

    Grasim (Aditya Birla Group) 51.8 4 4 0.0

    2

    Source: Company presentations of 2012 results

    Note s : 1 Cement and clinker sales are combined for Anh ui Conch. The company plans to increase cement production capacity to 231.5Mtpy during 2013

    2 Roskill estimates based on company reports 3 Eurocement plans to increase total production capacity to 45.4Mtpy by 2017

    4 Grasim plans to increase total production capacity to 62Mtpy by 2014

    Source: Gypsum Global Industry Markets and Outlook, 11th edition,

    2013, Roskill

  • Recent quotes from cement producers on fuel

    Anhui Conch:

    A volatile construction industry, FUEL COSTS and the risks of further government regulation constitute our greatest risks to 2017

    Lafarge:

    While we take a number of steps designed to manage energy and FUEL COST RISK, these measures may not be fully effective in protecting us from this risk

    Holcim

    In our industry, companies that procure more efficiently in 2013 will have a cost, and therefore a competitive, advantage

    Roskill observation:

    Cement is one of very few energy-intensive materials that saw its prices FALL over the period

    2007-2012 despite a rising cost base of between 5% and 25% over the same period

  • The role of petroleum coke

  • Typical fuel breakdown for a major cement producer in 2013

    Coal 57%

    Petroleum coke 20%

    Heavy fuel 1%

    Shale/lignite 5%

    Alternative fuels 10%

    Biomass 2%

    Natural gas 5%

    Source: Roskill based on 2012 annual results for selected major cement producers

  • Advantages and disadvantages of petroleum coke versus thermal coal

    Petroleum coke is relatively difficult to burn and has to be blended with

    coal

    Petroleum coke can be hard to grind

    High sulphur content can present SOx challenges

    Can have a high metal content

    Price

    Price

    Price

    Disadvantages Advantages

    10

  • Petroleum coke trade flow pre 2009

    11

  • Petroleum coke trade flow 2012 to 2016

    12

  • Fuel grade petroleum coke trade flow has changed oceans

    Source: Global Trade Atlas

    13

  • China also now the main prop of the Asian market for thermal coal

    Source: Xinhuas China Economic Information Service

    14

  • Baltic Dry Index of Ocean Freight Costs

    15% Africa

    32%

    Europe 99% USA

    2% Asia

    40% Other

    15

  • Delivered prices: petroleum coke price as a % of thermal coal price

    Source: Petroleum Coke Global Industry Markets & Outlook, 2012, Roskill

    16

  • Price of fuel grade petroleum coke imports into Asia (US$/t)

    Source: Petroleum Coke Global Industry Markets & Outlook, 2012, Roskill

    17

  • Carbon footprint

    Petroleum coke is a waste by-product

    It is produced as part of oil refineries quest to maximize refinery profitability

    This is important when considering relative impacts of the use of petroleum coke versus use of fossil fuels in power generation

    Coal, oil and natural gas are discretionary extracted fuels and every GJ extracted has a carbon footprint associated with that discretionary use

    Petroleum coke, a by-product of the production of transportation fuels, is produced as the demand for transportation fuels, the crude feed slate and the

    refinery design dictates

  • Future economics and

    conclusions

  • Predictions to 2016

    Cement production will continue to grow in all regions outside Europe, with pricing gains everywhere

    Cheap energy sources are required to fuel this growth

    Petroleum coking capacity (fuel grade) worldwide will increase by 4%py to 2016. Roskill expects fuel grade petroleum coke production to total 143Mt by

    2016. 30Mt of this will end up in cement kilns

    America to Asia is by far the largest trade flow for petroleum coke

    Low international shipping freight rates are facilitating this globalisation

    Fuel grade petroleum coke will always be priced to move so delivered prices will continue to be positioned lower than delivered coal prices on a per GJ basis

  • Petroleum coke

    Global Industry Markets & Outlook

    6th edition, 2012

    Get accurate answers from independent experts

    Gypsum & anhydrite

    Global Industry Markets & Outlook

    11th edition, 2013 Contact Kerry Satterthwaite

    [email protected]

  • Thank you very much for your

    attention

    Any questions?