Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PHARMACEUTICAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT FOR THE ELDERLY
ANNUAL REPORT TO THE PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY
JANUARY 1 - DECEMBER 31, 2015
For the Pennsylvania Department of Aging Director Thomas M. Snedden Outreach and Enrollment Manager Rose M. Paulus Administrative Officer Janis L. Rhodes Operations Manager Rebecca D. Lorah, MPA Administrative Assistant Carol Bebawi Administrative Assistant Megan McDaniel Research and Evaluation Chief Theresa V. Brown, MPA Program Analyst Ellaheh Otarod, MBA Program Analyst Antonino G. Vetrano, MPA
Pennsylvania Department of Aging The PACE Program
Forum Place Building 555 Walnut Street
5th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101-1919
717-787-7313 [email protected]
For Magellan Medicaid Administration, Inc. Officer in Charge Keira M. O’Brien Director, PACE Operations Bradley I. Kohler Assistant Director, PACE Operations Jean B. Sanders Cardholder Services Manager Janet N. Casterella Health Outcomes Scientist Jian Ding, PhD Clinical Pharmacist Judith Dooley, RPh Provider Services Manager Richard J. Flage Senior Health Outcomes Scientist Debra A. Heller, PhD, MPH Medicare Part D Manager Lisa M. Irwin Clinical Pharmacist Michelle LaSure, RPh Clinical Pharmacist Colleen M. Moyer, RPh Business Services Manager Donald G. Smith LAN/WAN Manager W. Todd Spacht Quality Assurance Manager Lisa Spiegel Systems Manager John K. Wheeler
Magellan Medicaid Administration 4000 Crums Mill Road, Suite 301
Harrisburg, PA 17112 717-651-3600
Any questions or comments pertaining to information within this report may be addressed to the Pennsylvania Department of Aging at the address given above.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Frequently Requested Program Statistics ......................................................................................... 1
History ............................................................................................................................................... 3
Administration ................................................................................................................................... 5
Section 1 – Program Research Highlights .............................................................................. 7-16 Section 2 – Financial Data by Date of Service ...................................................................... 17-32
Table 2.1A Historical Claim and Expenditure Data for PACE Enrolled ........................... 19-20 and Participating Cardholders by Semi-Annual Period Based On Date of Service January 1991 - December 2015 Table 2.1B Historical Claim and Expenditure Data for PACENET Enrolled .................... 21-22 and Participating Cardholders by Semi-Annual Period Based On Date of Service July 1996 - December 2015 Figure 2.1 PACE and PACENET Claim Distribution by Amount Paid per Claim ................ 23 January - December 2015 Figure 2.2 Distribution of PACE Annual Benefit .................................................................. 24 January - December 2015 Figure 2.3 Distribution of PACENET Annual Benefit .......................................................... 25 January - December 2015 Table 2.2 Total Prescription Cost, Expenditures, Offsets, and Recoveries ....................... 26 January - December 2015 Figure 2.4 PACE and PACENET Enrollment, Claims, and ................................................. 27 Claims Expenditures by Calendar Year 1988-2015 Figure 2.5A PACE Total Enrolled and Participating Cardholders ......................................... 28 By Month January 2005 – January 2016 Figure 2.5B PACENET Total Enrolled and Participating Cardholders .................................. 29 By Month January 2005 – January 2016 Figure 2.6A PACE Average Wholesale Price (AWP) and .................................................... 30 Average Manufacturer’s Price (AMP), Brand Products Only, by Quarter
January 2000 – December 2015
Figure 2.6B PACE Average Wholesale Price (AWP) and ................................................ 31
Average Manufacturer’s Price (AMP), Generic Products Only, by Quarter
January 2000 – December 2015
Section 3 – Program Data by Date of Payment ..................................................................... 33-46
Table 3.1 PACE and PACENET Claims and Expenditures Paid by Fiscal Year .......... 35-37 July 1984 - December 2015 Table 3.2A PACE High Expenditure and High Volume Claims ....................................... 38-40 January - December 2015 Table 3.2B PACENET High Expenditure and High Volume Claims ................................ 41-43 January - December 2015 Table 3.3 PACE and PACENET Number and Percent of ............................................ 44-45 Expenditures and Claims by Manufacturer January - December 2015 Table 3.4 Manufacturers' Rebate Cash Receipts by Quarter/Year .................................... 46 Billed and by Fiscal Year Received January 1991 - December 2015
Section 4 – Cardholder Utilization Data ................................................................................. 47-62
Table 4.1 PACE and PACENET Cardholder Enrollments by Quarter .......................... 49-51 July 1984 – December 2015 Table 4.2A PACE Cardholder Enrollment, Participation, Utilization, ............................... 52-53 and Expenditures by Demographic Characteristics January - December 2015 Table 4.2B PACENET Cardholder Enrollment, Participation, Utilization, ....................... 54-55 and Expenditures by Demographic Characteristics January - December 2015 Figure 4.1A Percent of Enrolled PACE Cardholders by Income ........................................... 56 and Marital Status January - December 2015 Figure 4.1B Percent of Enrolled PACENET Cardholders by Income .................................... 57 and Marital Status January - December 2015 Table 4.3 Other Prescription Insurance Coverage of PACE and ....................................... 58 PACENET Enrolled Cardholders January - December 2015 Table 4.4 Part D Cardholder Enrollment, Participation, and Expenditures ................... 59-60 January - December 2015
Table 4.5 Annual Drug Expenditures for PACE/PACENET Enrolled ................................. 61 By Total Drug Spend, Part D Status, and LIS Status January - December 2015 Figure 4.2 PACE Generic Utilization Rates by Quarter ...................................................... 62 December 1988 - December 2015
Section 5 – County Data .......................................................................................................... 63-70
Table 5.1 Number and Percent of PACE and PACENET Cardholders ........................ 65-67 and Number of Providers by County January - December 2015 Figure 5.1 PACE and PACENET Cardholder, Claim, and Provider .................................... 68 Information by County Type (Percent of County Population Living in Urban Area) January - December 2015 Figure 5.2 Percent of Elderly Enrolled in PACE/PACENET and ......................................... 69 Percent Urban Population by County January - December 2015
Section 6 - Provider Data ......................................................................................................... 71-80
Table 6.1 PACE Claims by Product and Provider Type .................................................... 73 January - December 2015 Table 6.2 PACE Expenditures and Average State Share by Product and ........................ 74 Provider Type January - December 2015 Table 6.3 PACENET Claims and Expenditures by Provider Type ..................................... 75 January - December 2015 Table 6.4 PACENET Claims Volume by Phase of Coverage, ........................................... 76 Product Type, and Provider Type January - December 2015 Table 6.5 PACENET Expenditures by Phase of Coverage, ......................................... 77-78 Product Type, and Provider Type January - December 2015 Table 6.6 Average Cardholder and State Share Cost per PACENET ............................... 79 Claim by Phase of Coverage, Product Type, and Provider Type January - December 2015
Section 7 - Therapeutic Class Data and Drug Utilization Review Data ............................... 81-90
Table 7.1A Number and Percent of PACE Claims, State Share Expenditures, .............. 83-84 and Cardholders with Claims by Therapeutic Class January – December 2015
Table 7.1B Number and Percent of PACENET Claims, State Share .............................. 85-86 Expenditures, and Cardholders with Claims by Therapeutic Class January – December 2015 Figure 7.1 Percent of PACE State Share Expenditures by Therapeutic Class ................... 87 January - December 2015 Figure 7.2 Number and Percent of PACE and PACENET Claims ................................. 88-89 with a Prospective Review Message by Therapeutic Class January - December 2015
Section 8 - Pennsylvania Patient Assistance Program Clearinghouse (PA PAP) .............. 91-94 Appendix A - The PACE Application Center 2015 Report, ...................................................... 95-107
University of Pennsylvania and PACE/PACENET Behavioral Health Lab Program 2015 Report, and The PACE Academic Detailing Program Impact Analysis, January 2013 - December 2015
Appendix B - The PACE/PACENET Medical Exception Process.................................................. 108
Appendix C - American Hospital Formulary Service (AHFS) Classifications ................................ 109
Appendix D - PACE Prospective Drug Utilization Review Criteria ........................................ 110-143
Appendix E - State Funded Pharmacy Programs Utilizing the PACE Program Platform ...... 144-147
FREQUENTLY REQUESTED PROGRAM STATISTICS
The table below provides frequently requested Program information and lists references within the Annual Report for additional details.
2015 PACE AND PACENET SUMMARY PACE PACENET REFER TO: DEMOGRAPHIC DATA Total enrolled for 2015 118,769 176,438 Tables 4.2, A and B % Participating 76.8% 79.3% Tables 4.2, A and B Avg. age for enrolled 79.6 yrs. 78.5 yrs. Tables 4.2, A and B Female, avg. age 80.4 yrs. 78.9 yrs. Male, avg. age 76.9 yrs. 77.7 yrs. % Female 76.7% 66.3% Tables 4.2, A and B % Own residence 52.4% 66.3% Tables 4.2, A and B % Rent 29.2% 22.0% Tables 4.2, A and B % Married 9.0% 35.3% Tables 4.2, A and B Avg. Income $11,898 $21,058 Tables 4.2, A and B % Cardholders in urban counties 41.3 % 37.3 % Table 5.1 % Cardholders in rural counties 13.6 % 14.2 % Table 5.1 BENEFIT DATA Avg. total expenditures per enrolled cardholder $2,076 $2,372 Table 4.4 Avg. total expenditures per participant $2,701 $2,991 Table 4.4 Avg. total expenditures per claim $76.39 $86.22 Table 4.4 Avg. state share per enrolled cardholder $670 $684 Table 4.4 Avg. state share per participant $872 $862 Table 4.4 Avg. state share per claim $24.67 $24.85 Table 4.4 Avg. cardholder share per enrolled cardholder $138 $255 Table 4.4 Avg. cardholder share per participant $179 $322 Table 4.4 Avg. cardholder share per claim $5.06 $9.27 Table 4.4 Avg. TPL share per enrolled cardholder $1,268 $1,433 Table 4.4 Avg. TPL share per participant $1,650 $1,807 Table 4.4 Avg. TPL share per claim $46.66 $52.09 Table 4.4
2015 percent change in state share per claim 15.5%
increase 7.3%
increase Figure 2.1, 2014 and 2015
Avg. claims per participant 35.4 34.7 Tables 4.2, A and B Avg. number of therapeutic classes per participant 5.0 5.1 Tables 7.1, A and BUTILIZATION DATA (by date of payment) Total claims 3,236,154 4,849,682 Tables 6.1 and 6.4 Avg. claims per cardholder 27.2 27.5 Tables 6.1 and 6.4 Avg. deductible claims per cardholder - 4.4 Table 6.4 Avg. copaid claims per cardholder - 23.1 Table 6.4 Generic utilization rate 84.3% 83.6% Tables 6.1 and 6.4 PAYMENT DATA Total Program payout $77.32 M $121.41 M Table 3.1 Avg. weekly Program payout $1.49 M $2.33 M Table 3.1 Avg. annual Program payout per pharmacy $25,604 $40,201 Tables 3.1 and 5.1 % Program payout to chain pharmacies 58.2% 60.2% Tables 6.2 and 6.3
1
2
PENNSYLVANIA PHARMACEUTICAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT FOR THE ELDERLY History The Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly (PACE) Program was enacted in November 1983, and implemented on July 1, 1984. Its purpose is to assist qualified state residents who are 65 years of age or older in paying for their prescription medications. The PACE legislation was amended in 1987 for reauthorization and, in 1992, for the manufacturers’ rebate reauthorization and additional cost containment initiatives. The legislature expanded income eligibility for PACE on four occasions: 1985, 1991, 1996, and 2003. The 1996 legislation also created the PACE Needs Enhancement Tier (PACENET). In July 2001, Act 2001-77, the Pennsylvania Master Tobacco Settlement, increased PACENET income eligibility by $1,000. Recognizing that the nominal increases in Social Security income were making enrollees ineligible for PACE, the legislature also created a limited PACE moratorium, effective January 1, 2001, until December 31, 2002, which permitted enrollees to remain in benefit even though their incomes exceeded the eligibility limits. Late in 2002, Act 2002-149 extended the moratorium for the PACE enrollment and expanded it to include the PACENET enrollment as well. While this moratorium expired on December 31, 2003, cardholders who were enrolled prior to the expiration, and had their eligibility periods extending into 2004, were permitted to remain in the Program until their eligibility end date. In November 2003, Act 2003-37 enabled an unprecedented expansion for enrollment eligibility in the Programs, modified the $500 annual PACENET deductible, and changed the PACE copay structure. The legislation raised the income limits for PACE to $14,500 for individuals and $17,700 for married couples; it boosted the income cap for PACENET to $23,500 for single persons and to $31,500 for married couples. With a $480 deductible divided into monthly $40 amounts, PACENET paid benefits after the first $40 in prescription costs each month. Beginning in 2004, PACE and PACENET had a two-tiered prescription copayment structure. The PACE copayment became $6 for generic drugs and $9 for brand name products. The PACENET copayment remained at the original amounts of $8 for generics and $15 for brand name drugs. Act 37 required both Programs to adjust the copayments to reflect increasing drug prices over time. Act 37 instituted Federal Upper Limits (FUL) in the provider reimbursement formula and raised the dispensing fee fifty cents. The Program began to reimburse pharmacies the lesser of three prices: the Average Wholesale Price (AWP) minus 10%, plus a $4.00 dispensing fee; the Usual and Customary charge to the cash-paying public; or, the most current FUL established in the Medicaid program, plus a $4.00 dispensing fee. All payment methods include the subtraction of the cardholder’s copayment. The federal Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003 created a new outpatient prescription drug benefit, Part D of Medicare. Prior to the full implementation of Medicare Part D and beginning in June 2004, low income, non-HMO, PACE enrollees (134,393 cardholders over 18 months) were auto-enrolled into the interim Medicare Drug Discount Card and Transitional Assistance Program. They received a discount card that allowed for $600 per year in drug expenses in 2004 and again in 2005. Additional cardholders, estimated at 30,000, received this assistance through cards issued by their HMO. The PACE Program covered the Medicare drug card copayments for the auto-enrolled cardholders. The Medicare Transitional Assistance Program was a source of significant drug coverage for cardholders, with known savings in Program benefit payments of $112 million for the auto-enrolled cardholders. The Medicare Part D drug benefit began in January 2006. The PACE Program elected to be a qualified State Pharmacy Assistance Program which, along with the
3
passage of state Act 111 in July 2006, allowed for the creation of PACE Plus Medicare. The successful launch of “PACE Plus Medicare” on September 1, 2006, saw thousands of cardholders take advantage of the features of both PACE and Medicare Part D. With the goal of providing seamless coverage, PACE provides benefits when Medicare Part D does not, for example, during the deductible and the coverage gap, for drugs excluded under MMA, for drugs not in a plan’s formulary, and for copayment differentials between the Part D plan coverage and the PACE and PACENET copayments. The Program pays the Medicare premiums for Part D coverage for PACE cardholders. Act 111 also eliminated the monthly deductible for PACENET cardholders. PACENET cardholders who choose to forego Part D coverage are now responsible for a monthly benchmark premium payment ($32.59 in 2006; $28.45 in 2007; $26.59 in 2008; $29.23 in 2009; $32.09 in 2010; $34.07 in 2011, $34.32 in 2012; $36.57 in 2013; $35.50 in 2014; $33.91 in 2015; and, $35.30 in 2016) to the Program. The benchmark annual premium payment remains lower than the prior $40 per month deductible. Act 111 of 2006 recreated the PACE and PACENET moratoriums thereby permitting some 14,000 seniors to maintain their PACE or PACENET status despite disqualifying increases in their overall income due to Social Security cost-of-living increases. The PACE moratorium expired at the end of 2006; the PACENET moratorium continued through 2007. The Act revised provider reimbursement by adjusting the Average Wholesale Price formula from AWP minus 10% to AWP minus 12%, plus a $4.00 dispensing fee. Act 69 of 2008 recreated the PACE and PACENET moratoriums, thereby permitting 15,400 seniors to maintain their Program enrollment in 2010 despite disqualifying increases in their overall 2008 income due to Social Security cost-of-living increases. Act 21 of 2011 extended the moratorium until December 31, 2013, allowing 31,000 persons to remain enrolled. Act 12 of 2014 established the moratorium expiration date for December 31, 2015, preserving the enrollment for 28,000 older adults. This Act also instituted the exclusion of Medicare Part B premium costs from the definition of total income used for income eligibility determination. As of May 2014, 46,000 cardholders retained their enrollment in the Program due to these two provisions of Act 12. Act 91 in 2015 extended the PACE and PACENET moratoriums until December 2017. In July of 2015, 10,000 cardholders retained enrollment due to the Part B premium exclusion provision and 11,400 older persons remained enrolled due to the Social Security cost-of-living exclusion. PACE covers all medications requiring a prescription in the Commonwealth, as well as insulin, insulin syringes, and insulin needles, unless a manufacturer does not participate in the Manufacturers’ Rebate Program. PACE does not cover experimental medications, medications for hair-loss or wrinkles, or over-the-counter (OTC) medications that can be purchased without a prescription. With appropriate documentation, PACE covers Drug Efficacy Study Implementation (DESI) medications. PACE requires generic substitution of brand multi-source products when an approved, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) A-rated generic is available. At the time of dispensing, a cardholder may encounter a prospective drug utilization review edit; PACE will not reimburse the prescription unless the pharmacist or physician documents the medical necessity for it. The Department of Aging recognizes the possibility of exceptional circumstances in connection with the application of therapeutic criteria and reimbursement edits. Appendix A contains a description of the PACE/PACENET medical exception process. With the advent of PACE Plus, cardholders enrolled in Part D plans conform to the reimbursement limits established by the plans, some of which allow up to a ninety-day supply. Otherwise, cardholders not enrolled in a Part D Plan receive a thirty-day supply or 100 units (tablets or capsules) whichever is less. The Program guarantees reimbursement to the provider (including nearly 2,900 Pennsylvania pharmacies) within 21 days, paying interest on any unpaid balance after 21 days. Six types of providers dispense PACE/PACENET-funded prescriptions to
4
cardholders. The majority of providers are either independent pharmacies or chain pharmacies. Other provider types include institutional pharmacies, nursing home pharmacies, mail order pharmacies, and dispensing physicians. All providers may offer mail order services if they are enrolled as a mail order pharmacy and if they follow specialized program requirements pertaining to record keeping and cardholder verification procedures. Manufacturers for innovator products pay the Program a rebate similar to the federal “best price” Medicaid rebate. Generic manufacturers paid an 11% rebate based on the average manufacturer price (AMP). An inflation penalty applies to innovator products if annual price increases exceed the consumer price index. The inflation penalty rebate was discontinued for generic products at the end of 2006. Effective January 2010, the federal Medicaid flat rebate rate increased from 15.1% of the AMP to 23.1%, and the generic rate increased from 11% to 13%. Administration The Pennsylvania Department of Aging administers the PACE/PACENET Program. A contractor directly responsible to the Department assists in conducting many of the day-to-day operations. Four primary operational responsibilities of the Program are to process applications, reimburse providers for prescriptions, protect enrollees from adverse drug events, and obtain the most cost-efficient reimbursement possible for the Program. Administrative responsibilities include research and policy development, monitoring and evaluating operations and ensuring that the mandates of the Act and Program regulations are met. Activities in these areas include conducting audits of not only the providers, but also of the cardholders and the contracting agency. The Program routinely reviews medication utilization profiles of the cardholders and dispensing practices of the providers and physicians. The Department also evaluates the procedures used to implement the Program, identifies any trends which may be relevant for future administration, and carefully scrutinizes all expenditures. The Department of Aging receives funds through restricted revenue accounts to serve as the administrative and fiscal agent for other Commonwealth-sponsored drug reimbursement programs. Pharmaceutical claims for the Chronic Renal Disease Program, Cystic Fibrosis Program, Spina Bifida Program, Metabolic Conditions Program, including Maple Syrup Urine Disease Program and the Phenylketonuria Program (all within the Department of Health), and the two Special Pharmaceutical Benefits Programs (Department of Health for SP1 and Department of Human Services for SP2) are processed through the PACE/PACENET system. The program also adjudicates claims for two programs in the Department of Insurance, the Workers’ Compensation Security Fund and the Pennsylvania Automobile Catastrophic Loss Benefits Continuation Fund. The PACE Program serves as the fiscal agent for the General Assistance Program (Department of Human Services), the Special Pharmaceutical Benefits Program, and the Chronic Renal Disease Program for the collection of rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers. The Program processes eligibility applications for the Chronic Renal Disease Program and for the SP1 Program. The PACE Program conducts benefit outreach and assistance for persons identified by the Board of Probation and Parole. Prescription claim processing and program management support is provided to the Department of Corrections. The Pennsylvania Patient Assistance Program Clearinghouse (PA PAP) is available to assist all adult Pennsylvanians with the cost of prescription drugs. PA PAP outreaches to those who are uninsured or under-insured by helping them to apply for prescription assistance through various programs. Details about the Clearinghouse are found in Section 8 of this report.
5
6
SECTION 1
PROGRAM RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS
7
8
INTERV
ENTIONS, GEN
ERAL
PRO
GRA
M ASSESSM
ENTS, A
ND M
EDICAT
ION ADHER
ENCE
STU
DIES
CURR
ENT PA
CE/PAC
ENET
COLLAB
ORA
TIVE
RESEA
RCH AND EVA
LUAT
ION PRO
JECT
S, 2008 – 2016, A
UGUST 2016 UPD
ATE
INTERV
ENTIONS
TOPIC
TITLE / RE
SEAR
CH GRO
UP
DESCR
IPTION
ASSESSMEN
T FO
R DEP
RESSION,
ANXIETY, AND
SLEEP
DISORD
ERS
TELEPH
ONE‐BA
SED
BEHAV
IORA
L HEA
LTH
ASSESSMEN
T FO
R SENIORS
ON
NEW
PSYCH
OTR
OPIC
MED
ICAT
ION
Beha
vioral Health
Lab
oratory,
Med
ical Schoo
l, University
of
Penn
sylvan
ia
Results from aPACE statew
ide collaborative care program
by the Beh
avioral H
ealth Laboratory (begun in
2008) support
concerns related to psychotropic m
edication prescribing in the elderly and raise additional questions about off‐label or
inappropriate prescribing. Overall, 45.0%
of p
articipan
ts did not m
eet criteria fo
r any
men
tal health
disorde
r with
low
symptom
s ind
icated
. (About 42% of Phase II participants were minim
ally sym
ptomatic.) Ju
st 6% m
et th
e crite
ria fo
r anxiety
disorders. The study found that older, community dwelling patients received new
psychotropic m
edications in excess of
what m
ight be expected based
on their relatively low sym
ptom burden
. Many reported
that the prescription was for a
psychosocial stressor (43.8%), while 15.8% were unaw
are of the reason for the prescription.
Interven
tion aims includ
e assigning individu
als with
clin
ically significan
t sym
ptom
s to minim
al m
onito
ring or m
onito
ring
with
care man
agem
ent a
nd social service su
pport in orde
r to de
term
ine whe
ther th
e clinical se
rvices are im
pacting
outcom
es. Outcomes analyses show that enhanced care managem
ent im
proves symptoms and overall functioning relative
to standard m
onitoring services alone. In the high sym
ptom group, care managem
ent advice has led to referrals to specialist
care. With low sym
ptom patients, the assessmen
t explores reasons for the psychotropic m
edication and consideration of
discontinuation after persisten
ce of measured low sym
ptoms.
Care m
anagem
ent cases are asked
at the
nine week follo
w up ab
out the
ir satisfaction level. The
re is a very high
level of
enrollee satisfaction with
the care m
anagem
ent service (>
95%
satisfaction).
A recen
t analysis of patient chronic pain found significant differences in levels of dep
ression, anxiety, and quality of life
between those who experience interferen
ce of pain versus those who do not.
Two programs, SUSTAIN and
CRE
ST (see
App
endix), p
romote no
n‐ph
armacological interven
tions th
rough assessmen
t and
assistan
ce with
add
ressing psycho
social stressors. W
ith SUSTAIN, in 2015, the Beh
avioral H
ealth Laboratory completed 634
initial assessm
ents for new
patients and caregivers. Five initial assessm
ents were direct referrals from the prescribing
physician or from the PACE Application Center. There were 2,442 follow‐up assessm
ents with cardholders and caregivers.
Among them
, 240 cardholders received
care managem
ent services; 289 cardholders received
sym
ptom and m
edication
monitoring services; 29 cardholders were referred
to specialty men
tal health services; 19 caregivers participated
in the
Telehealth Education Program
for caregivers of persons with dem
entia. This p
rivate‐pu
blic partnership re
ceived
the Bron
ze
Award as part o
f the
nationa
lly re
cognized
2015 Am
erican
Psychiatric Associatio
n Ac
hievem
ent A
wards.
In 2015, CREST assessed
139 cardholders and/or their caregivers. Of the 83 caregivers in this group, 66 caregivers worked
directly with a beh
avioral health provider in
care managem
ent and CREST ed
ucation services. There were 25 cardholders
who failed the initial m
emory screening and did not iden
tify a caregiver.
There were three project papers published
in 2015 in
peer‐review
ed journals (see
Appen
dix).
FALLS
PREV
ENTION
FALLS‐FR
EE PA
Gradu
ate Scho
ol of P
ublic
Health
, University
of P
ittsburgh
The Cen
ters for Disease Control and Prevention provided
funds for this two year research grant. R
esearche
rs at the
Gradu
ate Scho
ol of P
ublic Health
at the
University
of P
ittsburgh
and
the PA
Dep
artm
ent o
f Aging
examined
cou
nty level
falls incide
nce an
d the effect of the
Dep
artm
ent’s
Hea
lthy Step
s for Older Adu
lts and
Hea
lthy Steps in Motion projects. A
phy sician ed
ucation compo
nent includ
ed su
rveying ph
ysicians who
see
older adu
lts in
their p
ractice an
d offerin
g mailed
and on
line ed
ucationa
l materials (h
ealth
yaging.pitt.edu
) with
CME/CEU credits. Findings from the evaluation of the
Healthy Step
s program
s were incorporated into the well‐received
Preventing Falls Among the Elderly m
odule developed
for
the PACE Program
’s academ
ic detailing effort in
2014.
9
ACAD
EMIC
DETAILING
UPD
ATING PHY
SICIAN
S AB
OUT
CHAN
GING THE
RAPIES IN
CO
MPLICAT
ED DISEA
SE STA
TES
The Division of Pha
rmaco‐
epidem
iology and
Pha
rmaco‐
econ
omics o
f the
Brig
ham and
Wom
en’s Hospital/Harvard
Med
ical Schoo
l and
Alosa Health
PACE
offersa long
‐stand
ing ph
ysician ed
ucation program. Ph
ysicians at the
Harvard M
edical Schoo
ltrain Pen
nsylvania‐
based clinical edu
cators to
meet o
ne‐on‐on
e with
clin
icians who
care for a
large nu
mbe
r of p
atients e
nrolled in PAC
E.
During the office visits, begun in
2005, the ed
ucators provide objective, research‐based
inform
ation about effective drugs
and non‐m
edication therapeutic options for common chronic conditions. Edu
cators have logged
nearly
19,600 visits.
During 2015
, five mod
ules accou
nted
for 9
5% of the
2,653
visits
during the year to
over 9
00 practition
ers.
The Alzheimer’s and
related disorders m
odule (113 visits) helps primary care practitioners to m
anage Alzheimer’s disease
and other form
s of cognitive im
pairm
ent in their practice. It covers definitions, differential diagnosis, and risk factors for
dem
entia and m
ild cognitive im
pairm
ent. Clinicians hear recommen
dations about screen
ing and evaluation. The materials
summarize curren
t eviden
ce for non‐pharmacologic al and pharmacological m
anagem
ent of cognitive im
pairm
ent.
M
anaging pa
in in
the elde
rly (640 visits) presents the need for safe, effective pain relief am
ong older adults across a
range of settings. Achieving functional goals that do not pose harm from side effects, addiction, or potential overdose is
challenging in this patient population due to such issues as the altered pharmacodynam
ics and pharmacokinetics with age,
the polypharmacy of older adults, potential cognitive deficits, heightened
risk of falls, and organ
‐specific vulnerabilities.
Evaluating an
d man
aging urinary incontinen
ce (780 visits) inform
s health care professionals that urinary incontinen
ce is
more common, m
ore serious, and m
ore treatable than
is often
recognized
. It is not a norm
al part of aging, even though
many patients are reluctant to discuss the topic. Doing so and form
ulating an
adeq
uate treatm
ent plan can
be
transform
ative. Referen
ce cards for clinicians and education m
aterials for family m
embers are part of the module.
The atria
l fi brillatio
n mod
ule (842 visits) focuses on the updated
stroke tool, CHADS 2‐VASc, promotes a bleed
ing risk tool,
HAS‐BLED, and updates prescribers on the novel oral anticoagulants which had
been approved since the previous version of
this m
odule. Even
though
elderly patients have increased bleed
ing risk, they ben
efit from anticoagulation. Providing this
module to prescribers raises awaren
ess of the ben
efits of starting older patients on anticoagulation.
Treating he
art failure in
prim
ary care (1
46 visits) updates clinicians on the American
College of Cardiology Foundation
and American
Heart Association heart failure stages. The module was very timely, as a med
ication for reduced ejection
fraction heart failure was recen
tly approved. Given
the focus on hospital readmissions, this topic is well received in
the field.
Clinicians express apprec iation for the patient brochures and the lifestyle tear‐off pieces.
For each topic, staff develops print materials, trains the educators, m
anages the interven
tion, and offers continuing
education credits. The physician faculty develops content based
upon common drugs used by and conditions affecting the
elderly. Educators distribute documen
ts to physicians during face‐to‐face meetings: comprehen
sive reviews of biomed
ical
literature, known as eviden
ce docum
ents; distillations of key inform
ation used as the basis for the discussion between
practitioner and the ed
ucator, known as summary do
cumen
ts; p
atient or caregiver brochures geared to the lay public,
including resources for additional inform
ation and support; and, lam
inated
, pocket‐sized
quick reference cards o
n treatmen
t and drug efficacy. These materials are fo
und at www.alosafoun
datio
n.org.
In 2015, m
odule evaluation surveys for all topics measured strong physician agreemen
t in response to the questions about
whether the program
ben
efits the well‐being of patients. Satisfaction elemen
ts with the highest agreem
ent scores included
: the PACE academ
ic detailer discussed
the ben
efits of specific therapies; the detailer explained
assessm
ent tools and how I
can use them
in m
y prac tice to select therapy; and, the academ
ic detailer presented eviden
ce on the efficacy and safety of
drugs and therapeu
tic alternatives. Evalua
tions of three
mod
ules, n
on‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs/coxib use, acid
supp
ressing drugs, and
use of a
nti‐p
sychotics, indicate th
at th
e program achieved redu
ctions in
the med
ications ta
rgeted
. In 2008‐2010, a parallel program
delivered
three ed
ucational m
odules that focused on preventing the need for
hospitalizations and institutionalizations: cognitive im
pairm
ent and associated
beh
avioral problems (709 visits), falls and
mobility problems (668 visits), and incontinen
ce (823 visits). These topics have been updated
and relaunched
.
10
ACAD
EMIC
DETAILING
EVAL
UAT
ION
EFFECT
S OF AC
ADEM
IC
DETAILING ON THE
TREA
TMEN
T OF TY
PE 2
DIABE
TES
Wilkes University
Schoo
l of
Pharmacy an
d Magellan
Health
/PAC
E
This program
evaluation study is focusedon the im
pact of the PACE physicianed
ucation program
on the treatm
ent of Type 2
diabetes. The study specifically examines prescribing patterns before and after prescribers participated
in the program
’s
2013 diabe
tes m
anagem
ent m
odule. This m
odule provided
prescribers with inform
ation on the comparative effectiven
ess
and safety of type 2 diabetes m
edications, presented eviden
ce regarding appropriate therapy strategies, and weighed
the
ben
efits, risks, and value of treatm
ent options with the intent to im
prove the quality of prescribing and patient care.
The methodology for this evaluation includes a quasi‐experim
ental design using an
interrupted tim
e‐series to track changes
in several prescribing quality metrics during the year preceding and the year following prescribers’ participation in
the
training module. In addition to the group of prescribers who received the diabetes m
anagem
ent training, the evaluation
analysis also includes a comparison group of PACE/PACEN
ET prescribers who did not receive the training.
The quality metrics iden
tified
for this study include:
Prescribing of metform
in for patients with Type 2 diabetes
Prescribing of HMG‐CoA red
uctase inhibitors (statins) for patients with Type 2 diabetes
Prescribing of either an angiotensin‐converting‐en
zyme (ACE) inhibitor or an
angiotensin II recep
tor blocker (ARB)
for patients who have both Type 2 diabetes and hypertension
Avoidance of long‐acting sulfonylureas (i.e. chlorpropramide, glyburide) in
patients with diabetes
Statistical analyses are in
progress and will be completed during the latter part of 2016.
IMPR
OVING
BRAIN HEA
LTH
AND QUAL
ITY
OF LIFE
THE RH
YTHM EXP
ERIENCE
AND
AFRICA
NA CU
LTURE
TRIAL
‐‐RE
ACT!
University
of P
ittsburgh
and
University
of P
ennsylvania,
Alzheimer’s Associatio
n, and
Magellan Health
/PAC
E
The PACE program
supports research related
to im
proving the lives of cardholders. In
2016, the RE
ACT!
Project began
to
explore whether African
dance or ed
ucation classes im
prove brain health or quality of life for older African
Americans
between 65‐75 years old. Letters to Program
enrollees invite them
to talk with researchers to determine if they are eligible.
The project ran
domly assigns participan
ts to
take
classes in
eith
er African
dan
ce or A
frican
a cultu
re and
edu
catio
n. Classes
are ab
out o
ne hou
r lon
g an
d occur three
days pe
r week for a
total of six m
onths. At the beginning and end of the study,
participants perform
a walking test, complete m
emory tasks, and fill out surveys about their health and m
ood. The study will
exam
ine whether brain health, fitness levels or quality of life im
proves as a result of participating in these activities.
INTERV
ENTION
FOR MILD
COGNITIVE
IMPA
IRMEN
T
INDIVIDUAL
IZE EV
ERYD
AY
ACTIVITIES‐‐IDE
A Occup
ationa
l The
rapy
Dep
artm
ent a
t the
University
of Pittsburgh
and
Magellan
Health
/PAC
E
Older personswith m
ild cognitive im
pairm
ents are at‐risk for increasing disability and dem
entia. Despite the common
conception that individuals with m
ild cognitive im
pairm
ent do not have disability in
daily activities, recen
t research at the
University of Pittsburgh has shown that they dem
onstrate im
paired perform
ance (i.e., preclinical disability) in cognitively‐
focused daily activities, such as grocery shopping and paying pills. The
purpo
se of this s
tudy
is to
examine the efficacy of
the IDEA
interven
tion to optim
ize pe
rforman
ce in
daily activities and
to delay th
e de
cline to fran
k disability in older adu
lts
who
have mild
cognitiv
e im
pairm
ent. Successful interven
ti on may help to offset b
oth fin
ancial and
emotiona
l burde
ns to
family m
embe
rs.
In 2016, PACE sent letters of invitation to cardholders living in Pittsburgh. O
nce enrolled in
the study, participants develop
effective strategies to work through
and around barriers to daily activities. They set a goal to address barriers, develop a plan
to address the goal, do the plan, and check whether the plan req
uires revising. M
ultiple sessions are completed in the home
over a 5‐w
eek period with a registered occupational therapist who encourages family m
embers to participate.
PHYSICAL
AC
TIVITY
AND
BRAIN HEA
LTH
HEA
LTHY BR
AIN RESEA
RCH
STUDY
Physical Activity
and
Weight
Man
agem
ent R
esearch Ce
nter
at th
e University
of P
ittsburgh
an
d Magellan Health
/PAC
E
As a prescription drug program
, PACE is aware of research studies that seek better ways to promote both gen
eral health and
brain health as peo
ple age. An
impo
rtan
t life
style be
havior th
at is link
ed to
improved
brain fu
nctio
n is physical activity
. The majority of studies exam
ining the effect of physical activity on brain health have focused primarily on structured form
s of moderate‐to‐vigorous intensity exercise, and m
any of these studies have used supervised exercise. However, it is unclear
whether brain and cognitive function can
be im
proved or sustained
with different patterns (e.g., multiple, shorter periods) of
physical activity. The
study
seeks to
show
that interm
itten
t physical activity
is effectiv
e for improving brain structure an
d
11
functio
n as well as cognitive
functio
n. Participants are 75 to 85 years old who do not exercise regularly but are able to
participate safely in
moderate intensity exercise. Study mem
bers complete baseline and six‐m
onth assessm
ents. As part of
the study, they also attend health and physical activity classes.
GEN
ERAL
PRO
GRA
M ASSESSM
ENTS
TOPIC
TITLE / RE
SEAR
CH GRO
UP
DESCR
IPTION
IMPR
OVE
D
HEA
LTH
STAT
US AN
D
AVOIDAN
CE
OF NURS
ING
HOME EN
TRY
AND LAT
ER
ENTR
Y INTO
WAIVE
R PR
OGRA
MS
PACE
ENRO
LLMEN
T PR
OVIDE
S AD
VANTA
GE FO
R LO
W
INCO
ME, PRE
‐MED
ICAID
SENIORS
Pe
nnsylvan
ia Dep
artm
ents of
Aging an
d Hum
an Services,
Office of Lon
g Term
Living,
Magellan Health
/PAC
E, M
ercer
Governm
ent H
uman
Services
Consultin
g, and
the Health
Po
licy Institu
te at G
eorgetow
n University
A 2010 analysisdem
onstrates that the PACE Program
supports many seniors prior to their Med
icaid enrollm
ent. Data
compare consumers who “had” and “did not have” PACE in a five year period prior to using long‐term
care or nursing waiver
services. Re
sults
suggest P
ACE en
rollm
ent e
nables sen
iors to
remain in th
e commun
ity longer, w
ith better h
ealth
, and
to
delay en
try into and
utilization of long
‐term care an
d waiver services. Findings include:
Average length of nursing facility stay over a 5‐year period was 40 days less for previous PACE en
rolled.
PACE mem
bers were older at en
try into a nursing facility by 2.8 years.
The ages at waiver en
try show PACE mem
bers were older by 3.1 years.
Later age of entry into nursing facilities provided
an estim
ated
annual savings of $728.8 M
.
Deferred waiver program
produced estim
ated
annual savings of $86.5 M
.
PACE en
rollees who have subsequen
t Med
icaid enrollm
ent have lower costs as a result of earlier PACE coverage.
The Program
takes advantage of its ideal position to educate those PACE seniors, w
ho are specifically known to be
income eligible, about the comprehen
sive health care coverage available through
Med
icaid, producing a unique,
efficien
t outreach and im
proved coordination with M
edicaid.
Analysts at Mercer Governmen
t Human
Services Consulting evaluated
the study and were prepared
to certify results.
SATISFAC
TION
SURV
EYS
PACE
/PAC
ENET
SURV
EY ON
HEA
LTH AND W
ELL‐BE
ING
Magellan Health
/PAC
E
The Survey on Hea
lth and
Well‐B
eing
provides inform
ation ab
out the
cardh
olde
r pop
ulation. Q
uestions m
easure
cardho
lders’ self‐rep
orted he
alth status, self‐rep
orted med
ication ad
herence an
d affordab
ility, and
satisfaction with
their
PACE
/PAC
ENET
coverage. Survey da
ta are freq
uently link
ed with
other im
portan
t data sources, in
clud
ing prescriptio
n records, M
edicare services re
cords, and
vita
l statistics records, and
are used for p
rogram
evaluation an
d original re
search
stud
ies. Included
in the PACE/PACEN
ET new
enrollm
ent application, the optional survey gathers im
portant inform
ation
about a person’s health im
med
iately prior to joining PACE. The optional ren
ewal survey is m
ailed to existing cardholders
throughout the year. Most ren
ewal survey questions are the same as the new
enrollm
ent survey, but a few questions are
different. It provides im
portant inform
ation about the cardholder’s health after being in PACE. A
nnual updates allow the
study of changes over time. The 2012 revised
response rate (after rem
oval of 3,324 deceased cardholders) was 49.9%.
Results
from
5% Ran
dom Sam
ple: N
early 31% of curren
t responden
ts indicated
that they did not complete high school w
ith
11% of curren
t responden
ts indicating that they had
an 8
th grade or less education. Understanding the ed
ucational
background of the population helps to ensure that cardholder communications are at an appropriate reading level. Among
cardholders who were en
rolled in
PACE at the time that they completed the survey, 88% rep
orted
that they were either
“extremely” or “quite a bit” satisfied with PACE. A
mong PACEN
ET enrolled cardholders, 78% were “extremely” or “quite a
bit” satisfied that PACEN
ET. Another 9% of PACE en
rollees and 15% of PACEN
ET enrollees were “m
oderately” satisfied
. These data indicate high levels of satisfaction with both Program
s. Cardholders who responded
to the survey also expressed
a high degree of satisfaction with the combination of PACE/PACEN
ET and M
edicare Part D by scoring a high average
satisfaction that ranged between strongly and somew
hat agree
that the combination works well for them
(1.3 for PACE and
1.5 for PACEN
ET on a 4.0 scale). N
early
41%
of respo
nden
ts self‐rep
orted a fall in th
e pa
st year, with
abo
ut 12%
of
respon
dents indicatin
g more than
one
fall an
d least o
ne injury due
to th
e fall. For global self‐rated health, 38% of
responden
ts had
fair or poor health. PACEN
ET cardholders report “not filling prescriptions due to cost” more frequen
tly
than
PACE cardholders with 12% of them
not filling a prescription two or more tim
es in
past year compared
to 7% for PACE.
12
SELF‐RAT
ED
HEA
LTH
IMPA
CT OF VA
NTA
GE PO
INT
ON THE AS
SOCIAT
ION
BETW
EEN SELF‐RA
TED HEA
LTH
AND M
ORT
ALITY
Magellan Health
/PAC
E an
d Th
e Med
icine, Health
, and
Aging
Project a
t Pen
n State
University
Numerous studies dem
onstrate that self‐rated health predicts m
ortality. The
goa
l of this s
tudy
was to
explore how
self‐
ratin
g vantage po
int a
ffects m
ortality pred
ictio
n. Subjects included
137,188 PACE en
rollees.
Three self‐rated he
alth van
tage points were used
: glob
al, age‐com
parativ
e (others o
f sam
e age) and
time compa
rativ
e (present vs. one
year a
go). M
ultivariate Cox proportional‐hazards regression was used to predict subsequen
t mortality over
two years, controlling for dem
ographics and m
edication‐based
comorbidity.
When
comparing global and age‐comparative ratings, 73% of persons reported
equal global and age‐comparative scores;
19% had
age‐comparative scores that exceeded
global scores; and, 8% indicated
age‐comparative scores worse than
global.
Age comparative scores worse than
global increased risk of mortality, while age‐comparative scores exceed
ing global scores
reduced risk. The im
pact of age‐comparati ve deviation fr om global was stronger in young er age groups. Controlling for
global self‐rated health, self‐assessed
change over the past year in
either direction increased m
ortality risk, but the effect
varied
by age (interaction p < .001), with the greatest im
pact observed
among younger elderly aged 65‐79.
These results
suggest tha
t com
parativ
e ratin
gs are particularly useful w
hen used
alongside
globa
l ratings, and
that
potential age differen
ces in van
tage
point m
eaning
may have a be
aring on
mortality pred
ictio
n.
BERE
AVEM
ENT
AND
MORT
ALITY
MORT
ALITY FO
LLOWING
WIDOWHOOD:
THE RO
LE OF PR
IOR SPOUSA
L HEA
LTH
Magellan Health
/PAC
E, The
Med
icine, Health
, and
Aging
Project a
t Pen
n State
University
, and
Emory
University
Rollin
s Schoo
l of
Public Health
Prior research has shown that widowhood is associated
with increased m
ortality risk; h
owever, it is not clear whether the
rapidity of the predeceased spouse’s health decline affects this risk. This s
tudy
used grou
p‐ba
sed trajectory m
odeling to
describ
e pred
eceased spou
ses’ patterns of health
declin
e, and
examined
associatio
ns with
post‐widow
hood
survival.
Subjects included
9,967 PACE/PACEN
ET cardholders who were widowed
between 2000 and 2006. The predeceased and
bereaved spouses’ health trajectories in
the year before widowhood were evaluated
for three measures: the Combined
Comorbidity Score, inpatient hospitalized
days, and ambulatory visits. M
ultivariate Cox proportional hazards models were
used to evaluate whether the predeceased spouse’s pattern of health decline affected
the subsequen
t survival of the
bereaved spouse, w
hile controlling for the bereaved spouse’s own historical health trajectory and other factors.
Multiple trajectory patterns of health decline before death emerged in
the predeceased sam
ple. Among predeceased
hospice users, stable low and late onset comorbidity patterns were both associated
with greater m
ortality in the bereaved,
relative to chronic high comorbidity (HR=1.47 and 1.62, respectively). Relative to stable m
edium levels of am
bulatory visits
among the predeceased, chronically high visit levels were associated
with a lower m
ortality rate in
the bereaved (HR=0.67),
while very low visit levels were associated
with higher post‐w
idowhood m
ortality in the bereaved (HR=1.32).
These results
dem
onstrate th
e utility of group
‐based
trajectory m
odels for describing pa
tterns of e
nd‐of‐life
declin
e, and
suggest tha
t una
nticipated
deaths m
ay be associated
with
greater post‐widow
hood
mortality risk for b
ereaved spou
ses.
OUTR
EACH
PA
CE APP
LICA
TION CEN
TER
Bene
fits D
ata Trust,
Philade
lphia
The PACE Application Cen
ter conducts data‐driven outreach and application assistance to connect Pen
nsylvanians with
public ben
efit program
s. The Cen
ter submits PACE applications for eligible persons and enrolls eligible persons in the
Med
icare Part D Low Income Subsidy (Extra Help). In 2015, the Cen
ter conducted
mail, telephone, and community‐based
outreach. In one
year, 27
,768
sen
ior h
ouseho
lds ap
plied for a
t least one
ben
efit, delivering $99.0 million in ben
efits.
PACE
Enrollm
ent O
utreach: The Cen
ter uses Property Tax and Ren
t Reb
ate rolls, and energy, food and prescription
assistance listings to iden
tify enrollm
ent candidates. In 2014, th
ere were 341,949 ou
treach attem
pts u
niqu
e to PAC
E an
d 11
,687
PAC
E ap
plications su
bmitted
. Low In
come Subsidy (LIS) O
utreach: The PACE Program
, by wrapping around the Part D ben
efit, incurs costs that could be
offset by LIS ben
efits which provide financial help to low income en
rollees. In 2015, th
e Ce
nter su
bmitted
8,837
ap
plications on be
half of older Pen
nsylvanian
s, as a
result of 113,104
LIS outreach actio
ns.
13
MED
ICAT
ION UTILIZA
TION STU
DIES
TOPIC
TITLE / RE
SEAR
CH GRO
UP
DESCR
IPTION
MED
ICAT
ION
ADHER
ENCE
AN
D HEA
LTH
OUTC
OMES
PROTO
N PUMP INHIBITO
R AD
HER
ENCE
AND FRA
CTURE
RISK
IN THE ELDER
LY
Magellan Health
/PAC
E an
d Th
e Med
icine, Health
, and
Aging
Project a
t Pen
n State University
Results of several recen
t studies suggest that long‐term
use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be associated
with an
increased risk of fracture. The
goa
l of this s
tudy
was to
examine the relatio
nship be
tween med
ication ad
herence an
d fracture risk amon
g elde
rly PPI users. The study cohort included
1,604 community‐dwelling PPI users and 23,672 non‐users
who were en
rolled in
the PACE Program
. Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) was computed to m
easure adheren
ce based
on prescription refill patterns. Tim
e‐dep
enden
t Cox proportional hazards models were used to estim
ate adjusted
hazard ratios of PPI use/adheren
ce for fracture
risk while controlling for dem
ographics, comorbidity, body mass index, smoking and non‐PPI m
edication use. The overall
inciden
ce of any fracture per 100 person‐years was 8.7 for PPI users and 5.0 for non‐users. A gradient in fracture risk
according to PPI adheren
ce was observed
. Relative to non‐users, fracture hazard ratios associated
with the highest
adheren
ce (PDC > 0.80), interm
ediate (PDC 0.40‐0.79), and lowest (PDC < 0.40) adheren
ce levels were 1.46 (p < 0.0001), 1.30
(p = 0.02), and 0.95 (p = 0.75), respectively.
These results
provide
furthe
r evide
nce that PPI use m
ay increase risk in
the elde
rly, and
highlight th
e ne
ed fo
r clin
icians to
pe
riodically re
assess elderly patients’ individu
alized
needs fo
r ongoing
PPI th
erap
y, while weighing po
tential risks and
be
nefits. The findings were published
in Calcified Tissue
Internationa
l in April 2014.
PHAR
MAC
Y AC
CESS AND
MED
ICAT
ION
ADHER
ENCE
MED
ICAT
ION ADHER
ENCE
IN
PHAR
MAC
Y DE
SERT
AND NON‐
DESER
T AR
EAS
University
of the
Scien
ces in
Philade
lphia an
d Magellan
Health
/PAC
E
This study expanded
the investigation of potential pharmacy desert areas in Pen
nsylvania to address the potential im
pact of
low pharmacy access on m
edication adheren
ce. Th
e stud
y specifically examined
refill adh
eren
ce m
easures for oral
diab
etes m
edications amon
g PA
CE/PAC
ENET
elderly re
siding
in th
ree coun
ties p
reviou
sly iden
tified as poten
tial pha
rmacy
deserts (Forest, M
ifflin, and Sullivan Counties) and in
seven
non‐pharmacy desert counties. Tw
o variations on the proportion
of days covered (PDC), prescription‐based
PDC and interval‐based
PDC, w
ere used to m
easure refill adheren
ce level.
Chi‐square and regression analyses results indicated
that while elderly in
non
‐desert regions had
slightly highe
r adh
eren
ce
levels th
an th
ose living in desert regions, the
se differen
ces were no
t statistically significan
t.
Although
this study did not find statistically significant differences in m
edication adheren
ce as a function of pharmacy desert
region residen
ce, the lim
ited
number of counties examined
may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research is
planned
to examine pharmacy desert regions and associated
health m
easures across broader regions of the state. The
results of this study were presented at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) ‐
21st Annual International M
eeting in M
ay 2016.
STAT
IN USE
ASSO
CIAT
ION BETWEEN
STAT
IN USE AND FRA
CTURE
RISK
AMONG THE ELDER
LY
Magellan Health
/PAC
E an
d Th
e Med
icine, Health
, and
Aging
Project a
t Pen
n State University
The im
pact of statins (w
idely used to treat hyperlipidem
ia)on fracture risk is still under deb
ate. The
goa
l of this s
tudy
was to
exam
ine the association be
tween statin use and
fracture risk amon
g the elde
rly by follo
wing 5,524 ne
w statin
users and
27
,089
non
‐users fo
r an average of 3.5 years.
Time‐dep
enden
t Cox proportional hazards models were used to estim
ate adjusted
hazard ratios of statin use for fracture risk
while controlling for dem
ographics, comorbidity, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol use, and certain therapeu
tic
classes. The
incide
nce of any
fracture per 100
person‐years was 3.0 fo
r statin
users and
7.8 fo
r non
‐users. Re
lativ
e to non
‐users, th
e ha
zard ra
tio associated with
statin use was 0.86 (p < 0.00 1
). Statin
users with
highe
r and
lower average daily
dose were associated
with
18%
and
9% decreased
fracture risk, respe
ctively.
The ha
zard ra
tio fo
r atorvastatin
was 0.81 (p < 0.001
), an
d the effects w
ere no
t significan
t for sim
vastatin and
pravastatin.
The protectiv
e effect of statin
user a
ppeared to be stronger amon
g users olde
r tha
n 85
years old. These results suggested
statin use is associated
with red
uced fracture risk am
ong the elderly, and the effect m
ay be dep
enden
t on age and statin
type. The ben
eficial effect of statin on bone may be helpful in the prevention of fractures am
ong elderly.
14
PHAR
MAC
Y AC
CESS
ACCE
SSIBILITY OF PH
ARMAC
Y SERV
ICES IN
HIGH AND LOW
INCO
ME PE
NNSYLV
ANIA
COUNTIES
University
of the
Scien
ces in
Philade
lphia an
d Magellan
Health
/PAC
E
This re
search
build
s on several prio
r studies ofp
harm
acy de
serts, a te
rm used to describe geograph
ic areas whe
re
pharmacy services are sc
arce or d
ifficult to ob
tain. Pharmacy deserts can
occur as a result of large geographic distances
required
to reach pharmacies, or as a result of too few
pharmacies located in
a den
sely‐populated area. O
ne accepted
definition from existing literature specifically iden
tifies pharmacy deserts as low income areas where at least a third of the
population lives more than
one mile from an outpatient pharmacy.
This stud
y compa
red the availability of pha
rmacies an
d the average straight‐line
distance be
tween ho
me reside
nce an
d the ne
arest o
utpa
tient pha
rmacy for P
ACE/PA
CENET
cardh
olde
rs in
five high‐income an
d fiv
e low‐in
come coun
ties.
The average distance to the closest pharmacy was shorter in the low income group, w
hich was influen
ced largely by one
urban
county, Philadelphia County, w
here the average straight‐line distance to the nearest outpatient pharmacy was only 0.1
mile. In con
trast, three lower income rural cou
nties (M
ifflin
, Forest, an
d Sullivan Co
untie
s) were iden
tified as poten
tial
pharmacy de
serts. In these coun
ties, between 56% and
77%
of the
pop
ulation lived
more than
a m
ile away from
the
closest o
utpa
tient pha
rmacy. W
ith an average distance of 4.0 m
iles to the closest pharmacy, Sullivan County dem
onstrated
the lowest apparen
t accessibility. Th
is stud
y confirm
ed th
at geo
grap
hic accessibility varies substantially fo
r PAC
E/PA
CENET
cardho
lders a
cross P
ennsylvania, and
that pha
rmacy de
serts ap
pear to
exist in
several ru
ral areas of the
state. Results
were presented at the AMCP M
anaged
Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual M
eeting in April 2016.
MED
ICAT
ION
ADHER
ENCE
INITIAL MED
ICAT
ION
ADHER
ENCE
IN THE ELDER
LY
University
of the
Scien
ces in
Philade
lphia an
d Magellan
Health
/PAC
E
Initial m
edication adheren
ce describes the filling of new
med
ication prescriptions. This p
ilot study
explored thefeasibility of
using PA
CE claim
reversals as a proxy indicator o
f initia
l med
ication no
n‐ad
herence. The study specifically evaluated
differences in claim
reversal rates, as well as the timing of reversals, between electronic and non‐electronic prescriptions.
Understanding the potential im
pact of electronic prescribing (e‐prescribing) on initial m
edication adheren
ce is tim
ely given
increases in e‐prescribing which have occurred
in part as a result of provisions of the Med
icare Modernization Act.
Results of chi‐square analyses indicated
that electronic prescription claim
s were more likely than
other prescription origin
types to be reversed
, and that differences am
ong prescription origins were greater for reversals occurring after the
submission day compared
with sam
e‐day reversals. The
autho
rs con
clud
ed th
at electronic prescriptio
ns are associated
with
a highe
r rate of claim
reversals an
d may re
flect poo
rer initia
l adh
eren
ce. Electron
ic prescrip
tions m
ay be more likely
to be forgotten or otherwise no
t picked up
becau
se th
e electron
ic delivery of th
e prescriptio
n to th
e ph
armacy bypa
sses
the pa
tient. The study confirm
ed the im
portance of understanding the potential effect of electronic prescription
transm
ission on initial m
edication adherence in
the elderly. The results are sched
uled to be published
in the September 2016
issue of the Journa
l of M
anag
ed Care & Specialty Pha
rmacy.
15
16
SECTION 2
FINANCIAL DATA
BY DATE OF SERVICE
17
18
TA
BL
E 2
.1A
HIS
TO
RIC
AL
CL
AIM
AN
D E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E D
AT
A F
OR
PA
CE
EN
RO
LL
ED
AN
D P
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
G C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
BY
SE
MI-
AN
NU
AL
PE
RIO
D B
AS
ED
ON
DA
TE
OF
SE
RV
ICE
JAN
UA
RY
199
1 -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
PA
GE
1
CLA
IMS
PE
RC
LAIM
S P
ER
AV
ER
AG
E
SE
MI-
AN
NU
AL
EN
RO
LLE
DP
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
GT
OT
AL
EN
RO
LLE
DP
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
GT
OT
AL
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
PE
RIO
DC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
PE
R C
LAIM
JAN
-JU
N 1
991
405,
358
337,
684
5,28
0,37
613
.03
15.6
4$1
16,0
74,6
18$2
86.3
5$3
43.7
4$2
1.98
JUL-
DE
C 1
991
394,
055
324,
574
4,67
7,15
911
.87
14.4
1$1
09,8
71,6
50$2
78.8
2$3
38.5
1$2
3.49
JAN
-JU
N 1
992
399,
721
326,
469
4,65
6,98
611
.65
14.2
6$1
16,0
82,5
06$2
90.4
1$3
55.5
7$2
4.93
JUL-
DE
C 1
992
385,
103
313,
430
4,60
2,26
111
.95
14.6
8$1
17,0
81,6
02$3
04.0
3$3
73.5
5$2
5.44
JAN
-JU
N 1
993
376,
916
310,
438
4,40
2,17
111
.68
14.1
8$1
13,0
68,7
54$2
99.9
8$3
64.2
2$2
5.68
JUL-
DE
C 1
993
357,
777
296,
802
4,45
6,22
312
.46
15.0
1$1
16,1
64,3
81$3
24.6
8$3
91.3
9$2
6.07
JAN
-JU
N 1
994
354,
819
293,
462
4,32
0,15
912
.18
14.7
2$1
15,4
13,5
42$3
25.2
7$3
93.2
8$2
6.72
JUL-
DE
C 1
994
340,
607
281,
465
4,40
4,25
712
.93
15.6
5$1
19,1
00,7
41$3
49.6
7$4
23.1
5$2
7.04
JAN
-JU
N 1
995
331,
965
277,
461
4,38
3,96
813
.21
15.8
0$1
21,1
47,2
11$3
64.9
4$4
36.6
3$2
7.63
JUL-
DE
C 1
995
317,
719
263,
576
4,34
7,33
513
.68
16.4
9$1
22,1
58,8
72$3
84.4
9$4
63.4
7$2
8.10
JAN
-JU
N 1
996
306,
062
253,
283
4,24
4,19
013
.87
16.7
6$1
20,8
68,6
54$3
94.9
2$4
77.2
1$2
8.48
JUL-
DE
C 1
996
292,
755
238,
963
4,20
4,46
114
.36
17.5
9$1
20,4
29,8
40$4
11.3
7$5
03.9
7$2
8.64
JAN
-JU
N 1
997
286,
126
236,
157
4,28
6,47
814
.98
18.1
5$1
16,7
32,8
47$4
07.9
8$4
94.3
0$2
7.23
JUL-
DE
C 1
997
276,
180
226,
806
4,35
8,89
215
.78
19.2
2$1
23,4
82,0
56$4
47.1
1$5
44.4
4$2
8.33
JAN
-JU
N 1
998
267,
225
222,
465
4,23
5,61
915
.85
19.0
4$1
26,8
72,5
48$4
74.7
8$5
70.3
0$2
9.95
JUL-
DE
C 1
998
257,
009
213,
694
4,33
1,39
016
.85
20.2
7$1
37,1
46,4
44$5
33.6
3$6
41.7
9$3
1.66
JAN
-JU
N 1
999
246,
467
208,
992
4,31
6,58
817
.51
20.6
5$1
42,4
12,9
78$5
77.8
2$6
81.4
3$3
2.99
JUL-
DE
C 1
999
238,
388
200,
921
4,45
0,89
318
.67
22.1
5$1
53,5
96,6
48$6
44.3
1$7
64.4
6$3
4.51
JAN
-JU
N 2
000
237,
017
202,
683
4,44
9,10
218
.77
21.9
5$1
60,6
15,3
39$6
77.6
5$7
92.4
5$3
6.10
JUL-
DE
C 2
000
230,
752
197,
777
4,53
0,82
919
.64
22.9
1$1
69,8
86,4
76$7
36.2
3$8
58.9
8$3
7.50
JAN
-JU
N 2
001
225,
325
197,
082
4,55
8,33
920
.23
23.1
3$1
78,6
50,9
79$7
92.8
6$9
06.4
8$3
9.19
JUL-
DE
C 2
001
218,
576
190,
540
4,59
0,21
621
.00
24.0
9$1
87,8
20,5
34$8
59.2
9$9
85.7
3$4
0.92
JAN
-JU
N 2
002
216,
719
190,
131
4,55
8,00
021
.03
23.9
7$1
94,7
88,8
89$8
98.8
1$1
,024
.50
$42.
74
JUL-
DE
C 2
002
209,
737
183,
318
4,60
5,90
621
.96
25.1
3$2
03,5
91,4
48$9
70.7
0$1
,110
.59
$44.
20
JAN
-JU
N 2
003
209,
761
182,
654
4,55
2,66
221
.70
24.9
3$2
08,1
03,6
30$9
92.1
0$1
,139
.33
$45.
71
JUL-
DE
C 2
003
207,
144
180,
460
4,68
3,17
322
.61
25.9
5$2
21,5
12,8
77$1
,069
.37
$1,2
27.4
9$4
7.30
JAN
-JU
N 2
004
215,
486
189,
762
4,67
5,69
921
.70
24.6
4$2
09,7
31,9
50$9
73.3
0$1
,105
.24
$44.
86
JUL-
DE
C 2
004
209,
237
183,
970
4,63
9,59
422
.17
25.2
2$1
78,1
65,4
48$8
51.5
0$9
68.4
5$3
8.40
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
PE
R E
NR
OLL
ED
CA
RD
HO
LDE
R
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
PE
R P
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
G
CA
RD
HO
LDE
R
19
TA
BL
E 2
.1A
HIS
TO
RIC
AL
CL
AIM
AN
D E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E D
AT
A F
OR
PA
CE
EN
RO
LL
ED
AN
D P
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
G C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
BY
SE
MI-
AN
NU
AL
PE
RIO
D B
AS
ED
ON
DA
TE
OF
SE
RV
ICE
JAN
UA
RY
199
1 -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
PA
GE
2
CLA
IMS
PE
RC
LAIM
S P
ER
AV
ER
AG
E
SE
MI-
AN
NU
AL
EN
RO
LLE
DP
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
GT
OT
AL
EN
RO
LLE
DP
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
GT
OT
AL
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
PE
RIO
DC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
PE
R C
LAIM
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
PE
R E
NR
OLL
ED
CA
RD
HO
LDE
R
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
PE
R P
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
G
CA
RD
HO
LDE
R
JAN
-JU
N 2
005
209,
512
182,
450
4,60
2,80
221
.97
25.2
3$1
66,4
96,0
79$7
94.6
9$9
12.5
6$3
6.17
JUL-
DE
C 2
005
203,
956
177,
667
4,62
8,80
922
.70
26.0
5$2
08,6
31,7
07$1
,022
.93
$1,1
74.2
9$4
5.07
JAN
-JU
N 2
006
199,
426
172,
092
4,48
2,46
122
.48
26.0
5$1
96,3
69,2
22$9
84.6
7$1
,141
.07
$43.
81
JUL-
DE
C 2
006
194,
884
164,
174
4,07
1,75
520
.89
24.8
0$1
26,4
33,8
82$6
48.7
6$7
70.1
2$3
1.05
JAN
-JU
N 2
007
203,
104
167,
796
3,61
9,45
617
.82
21.5
7$8
1,20
2,59
5$3
99.8
1$4
83.9
4$2
2.44
JUL-
DE
C 2
007
183,
839
150,
273
3,48
7,88
218
.97
23.2
1$9
8,98
4,30
5$5
38.4
3$6
58.7
0$2
8.38
JAN
-JU
N 2
008
164,
728
133,
656
3,01
4,59
618
.30
22.5
5$7
0,09
6,78
1$4
25.5
3$5
24.4
6$2
3.25
JUL-
DE
C 2
008
160,
802
125,
319
2,87
8,01
717
.90
22.9
7$7
6,07
0,50
0$4
73.0
7$6
07.0
1$2
6.43
JAN
-JU
N 2
009
145,
634
119,
773
2,68
2,43
618
.42
22.4
0$5
5,42
6,88
9$3
80.5
9$4
62.7
7$2
0.66
JUL-
DE
C 2
009
141,
988
114,
169
2,54
6,78
117
.94
22.3
1$6
3,03
5,61
4$4
43.9
5$5
52.1
3$2
4.75
JAN
-JU
N 2
010
138,
520
113,
130
2,37
9,42
717
.18
21.0
3$5
6,13
1,54
0$4
05.2
2$4
96.1
7$2
3.59
JUL-
DE
C 2
010
134,
104
106,
535
2,17
5,10
616
.22
20.4
2$6
1,57
2,76
7$4
59.1
4$5
77.9
6$2
8.31
JAN
-JU
N 2
011
128,
440
103,
356
2,22
1,68
017
.30
21.5
0$4
5,30
7,89
8$3
52.7
6$4
38.3
7$2
0.39
JUL-
DE
C 2
011
125,
096
98,2
652,
061,
534
16.4
820
.98
$42,
777,
764
$341
.96
$435
.33
$20.
75
JAN
-JU
N 2
012
119,
166
95,4
072,
091,
129
17.5
521
.92
$42,
297,
874
$354
.95
$443
.34
$20.
23
JUL-
DE
C 2
012
116,
822
91,0
201,
943,
206
16.6
321
.35
$37,
252,
376
$318
.88
$409
.28
$19.
17
JAN
-JU
N 2
013
114,
935
88,4
421,
904,
685
16.5
721
.54
$36,
975,
064
$321
.70
$418
.07
$19.
41
JUL-
DE
C 2
013
109,
907
83,7
561,
767,
781
16.0
821
.11
$35,
191,
933
$320
.20
$420
.17
$19.
91
JAN
-JU
N 2
014
119,
491
90,2
231,
810,
547
15.1
520
.07
$36,
412,
429
$304
.73
$403
.58
$20.
11
JUL-
DE
C 2
014
117,
577
87,6
271,
730,
400
14.7
219
.75
$39,
226,
755
$333
.63
$447
.66
$22.
67
JAN
-JU
N 2
015
113,
731
84,9
521,
673,
305
14.7
119
.70
$40,
128,
728
$352
.84
$472
.37
$23.
98
JUL-
DE
C 2
015
109,
981
80,5
211,
553,
820
14.1
319
.30
$39,
473,
690
$358
.91
$490
.23
$25.
40
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CA
RD
HO
LDE
R F
ILE
, CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
NO
TE
S:
DA
TA
INC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
CLA
IMS
BY
DA
TE
OF
SE
RV
ICE
, EX
CLU
DE
PA
CE
NE
T C
LAIM
S.
XX
XX
XX
EN
RO
LLE
D C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S A
RE
TH
OS
E E
NR
OLL
ED
FO
R A
NY
PO
RT
ION
OF
TH
E R
EP
OR
TE
D P
ER
IOD
.
XX
XX
XX
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
AR
E C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S W
ITH
ON
E O
R M
OR
E A
PP
RO
VE
D C
LAIM
S D
UR
ING
TH
E R
EP
OR
TE
D P
ER
IOD
.
20
TA
BL
E 2
.1B
HIS
TO
RIC
AL
CL
AIM
AN
D E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E D
AT
A F
OR
PA
CE
NE
T E
NR
OL
LE
D A
ND
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
SB
Y S
EM
I-A
NN
UA
L P
ER
IOD
BA
SE
D O
N D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
EJU
LY
199
6 -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
PA
GE
1
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SP
ER
SE
MI-
AN
NU
AL
EN
RO
LLE
DP
AT
ING
TO
TA
LE
NR
OLL
ED
PA
TIN
GT
OT
AL
PE
R E
NR
OLL
ED
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
PE
RIO
DC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
JUL-
DE
C 1
996
1,52
374
02,
331
1.53
3.15
$823
$0.5
4$1
.11
$0.3
5
JAN
-JU
N 1
997
9,06
36,
369
75,7
218.
3511
.89
$592
,426
$65.
37$9
3.02
$7.8
2
JUL-
DE
C 1
997
12,5
239,
007
149,
187
11.9
116
.56
$2,6
76,2
59$2
13.7
1$2
97.1
3$1
7.94
JAN
-JU
N 1
998
18,0
5312
,683
175,
085
9.70
13.8
0$2
,909
,397
$161
.16
$229
.39
$16.
62
JUL-
DE
C 1
998
18,6
7313
,804
232,
846
12.4
716
.87
$4,7
38,1
27$2
53.7
4$3
43.2
4$2
0.35
JAN
-JU
N 1
999
22,2
7216
,649
263,
010
11.8
115
.80
$5,5
19,3
95$2
47.8
2$3
31.5
2$2
0.99
JUL-
DE
C 1
999
22,1
8716
,885
309,
280
13.9
418
.32
$7,4
16,8
66$3
34.2
9$4
39.2
6$2
3.98
JAN
-JU
N 2
000
25,7
3919
,762
339,
481
13.1
917
.18
$8,3
71,6
58$3
25.2
5$4
23.6
2$2
4.66
JUL-
DE
C 2
000
25,4
4619
,630
381,
074
14.9
819
.41
$10,
193,
859
$400
.61
$519
.30
$26.
75
JAN
-JU
N 2
001
29,5
2222
,146
412,
077
13.9
618
.61
$11,
255,
086
$381
.24
$508
.22
$27.
31
JUL-
DE
C 2
001
29,2
7823
,284
477,
954
16.3
220
.53
$13,
849,
683
$473
.04
$594
.82
$28.
98
JAN
-JU
N 2
002
35,5
0827
,594
540,
878
15.2
319
.60
$16,
333,
097
$459
.98
$591
.91
$30.
20
JUL-
DE
C 2
002
36,1
4628
,611
613,
528
16.9
721
.44
$20,
069,
086
$555
.22
$701
.45
$32.
71
JAN
-JU
N 2
003
39,2
6331
,011
644,
800
16.4
220
.79
$21,
627,
367
$550
.83
$697
.41
$33.
54
JUL-
DE
C 2
003
40,1
4831
,869
720,
687
17.9
522
.61
$25,
653,
456
$638
.97
$804
.97
$35.
60
JAN
-JU
N 2
004
93,8
6172
,605
1,30
5,26
613
.91
17.9
8$4
8,95
8,31
9$5
21.6
0$6
74.3
1$3
7.51
JUL-
DE
C 2
004
105,
018
82,6
311,
921,
310
18.3
023
.25
$71,
800,
234
$683
.69
$868
.93
$37.
37
JAN
-JU
N 2
005
123,
399
94,9
792,
176,
264
17.6
422
.91
$81,
372,
126
$659
.42
$856
.74
$37.
39
JUL-
DE
C 2
005
125,
108
99,2
422,
450,
953
19.5
924
.70
$96,
448,
835
$770
.92
$971
.86
$39.
35
JAN
-JU
N 2
006
134,
715
108,
462
2,70
8,71
020
.11
24.9
7$1
00,4
73,8
23$7
45.8
3$9
26.3
5$3
7.09
JUL-
DE
C 2
006
141,
099
109,
867
2,68
4,51
519
.03
24.4
3$7
7,09
3,60
0$5
46.3
8$7
01.7
0$2
8.72
JAN
-JU
N 2
007
162,
966
127,
001
2,63
0,62
916
.14
20.7
1$5
9,09
4,94
3$3
62.6
2$4
65.3
1$2
2.46
JUL-
DE
C 2
007
147,
627
116,
369
2,68
7,88
818
.21
23.1
0$8
5,50
6,49
9$5
79.2
1$7
34.7
9$3
1.81
JAN
-JU
N 2
008
176,
161
136,
910
2,95
0,98
816
.75
21.5
5$6
8,07
2,71
4$3
86.4
2$4
97.2
1$2
3.07
PA
RT
ICI-
AV
ER
AG
ES
TA
TE
SH
AR
EP
ER
CLA
IM
CLA
IMS
PE
RC
LAIM
S P
ER
PA
RT
ICI-
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
21
TA
BL
E 2
.1B
HIS
TO
RIC
AL
CL
AIM
AN
D E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E D
AT
A F
OR
PA
CE
NE
T E
NR
OL
LE
D A
ND
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
SB
Y S
EM
I-A
NN
UA
L P
ER
IOD
BA
SE
D O
N D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
EJU
LY
199
6 -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
PA
GE
2
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SP
ER
SE
MI-
AN
NU
AL
EN
RO
LLE
DP
AT
ING
TO
TA
LE
NR
OLL
ED
PA
TIN
GT
OT
AL
PE
R E
NR
OLL
ED
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
PE
RIO
DC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
PA
RT
ICI-
AV
ER
AG
ES
TA
TE
SH
AR
EP
ER
CLA
IM
CLA
IMS
PE
RC
LAIM
S P
ER
PA
RT
ICI-
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
JUL-
DE
C 2
008
182,
452
137,
834
3,07
8,47
716
.87
22.3
3$8
9,90
8,36
5$4
92.7
8$6
52.2
9$2
9.21
JAN
-JU
N 2
009
177,
553
140,
328
2,96
3,53
016
.69
21.1
2$6
6,83
3,67
1$3
76.4
2$4
76.2
7$2
2.55
JUL-
DE
C 2
009
184,
291
141,
689
3,02
3,68
616
.41
21.3
4$9
1,21
8,10
8$4
94.9
7$6
43.7
9$3
0.17
JAN
-JU
N 2
010
189,
558
148,
953
2,87
7,85
215
.18
19.3
2$7
8,56
0,90
4$4
14.4
4$5
27.4
2$2
7.30
JUL-
DE
C 2
010
192,
601
147,
462
2,84
9,51
814
.79
19.3
2$1
01,3
07,4
60$5
26.0
0$6
87.0
1$3
5.55
JAN
-JU
N 2
011
194,
040
151,
302
3,09
6,29
315
.96
20.4
6$6
5,22
3,93
9$3
36.1
4$4
31.0
8$2
1.07
JUL-
DE
C 2
011
193,
627
148,
687
3,06
4,46
315
.83
20.6
1$6
2,92
4,01
5$3
24.9
8$4
23.2
0$2
0.53
JAN
-JU
N 2
012
190,
699
149,
039
3,03
2,17
815
.90
20.3
4$6
4,05
3,62
3$3
35.8
9$4
29.7
8$2
1.12
JUL-
DE
C 2
012
189,
620
145,
552
2,98
3,62
815
.73
20.5
0$5
8,32
5,71
5$3
07.5
9$4
00.7
2$1
9.55
JAN
-JU
N 2
013
186,
979
143,
936
2,92
2,48
615
.63
20.3
0$5
8,08
2,93
7$3
10.6
4$4
03.5
3$1
9.87
JUL-
DE
C 2
013
183,
032
139,
397
2,85
3,56
515
.59
20.4
7$5
8,08
4,89
7$3
17.3
5$4
16.6
9$2
0.36
JAN
-JU
N 2
014
181,
792
138,
181
2,58
4,27
614
.22
18.7
0$5
6,59
8,68
1$3
11.3
4$4
09.6
0$2
1.90
JUL-
DE
C 2
014
168,
597
128,
307
2,50
2,79
114
.84
19.5
1$5
8,46
3,64
5$3
46.7
7$4
55.6
5$2
3.36
JAN
-JU
N 2
015
166,
664
128,
678
2,44
0,19
414
.64
18.9
6$5
9,29
2,99
3$3
55.7
6$4
60.7
9$2
4.30
JUL-
DE
C 2
015
165,
215
126,
056
2,41
3,59
414
.61
19.1
5$6
1,33
6,08
6$3
71.2
5$4
86.5
8$2
5.41
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CA
RD
HO
LDE
R F
ILE
, CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
NO
TE
S:
DA
TA
INC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
PA
CE
NE
T C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E.
TO
TA
L C
LAIM
S IN
CLU
DE
DE
DU
CT
IBLE
CLA
IMS
AN
D C
OP
AID
CLA
IMS
.
XX
XX
XX
EN
RO
LLE
D C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S A
RE
TH
OS
E E
NR
OLL
ED
FO
R A
NY
PO
RT
ION
OF
TH
E R
EP
OR
TE
D P
ER
IOD
.
XX
XX
XX
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
AR
E C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S W
ITH
ON
E O
R M
OR
E A
PP
RO
VE
D C
LAIM
S D
UR
ING
TH
E R
EP
OR
TE
D P
ER
IOD
.
22
83.8
%
79.7
%
50
%
60
%
70
%
80
%
90
%
PE
RC
EN
T O
F C
LA
IMS
FIG
UR
E 2
.1P
AC
E A
ND
PA
CE
NE
T C
LA
IM D
IST
RIB
UT
ION
BY
AM
OU
NT
PA
ID P
ER
CL
AIM
JA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
20
15
(PA
CE
N =
3,2
27
,12
5;
PA
CE
NE
T N
= 4
,08
5,5
42
)
PA
CE
(A
VE
RA
GE
CO
ST
PE
R C
LAIM
= $
24.6
7)
PA
CE
NE
T
(AV
ER
AG
E C
OS
T P
ER
CO
PA
ID C
LAIM
= $
29.5
2)
4.9%
1.8%
1.9%
1.5%
1.4%
4.7%
6.4%
2.3%
2.8%
1.8%
1.8%
5.2%
0%
10
%
20
%
30
%
40
%
$0
-$2
4.9
9$
25
-$4
9.9
9$
50
-$7
4.9
9$
75
-$9
9.9
9$
10
0-$
12
4.9
9$
12
5-$
14
9.9
9$
15
0 A
ND
OV
ER
AM
OU
NT
PA
ID P
ER
CL
AIM
(D
OL
LA
RS
)
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
NO
TE
: D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
OR
IGIN
AL,
PA
ID C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E, E
XC
LUD
E P
AC
EN
ET
DE
DU
CT
IBLE
CLA
IMS
.
23
41.5
%
32.6
%
20
%
25
%
30
%
35
%
40
%
45
%
OLLED CARDHOLDERS
FIG
UR
E 2
.2D
IST
RIB
UT
ION
OF
PA
CE
AN
NU
AL
BE
NE
FIT
JA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
20
15
N =
11
8,7
69
AV
ER
AG
E A
NN
UA
L P
AC
E B
EN
EF
IT =
$6
70
.23
8.2%
4.5%
3.0%
2.8%
2.1%
1.1%
0.8%
1.0%
1.1%
0.5%
0.6%
0%
5%
10
%
15
%
20
%
$0
$
1-$
49
9$
50
0-$
99
9$
1,0
00
-$
1,4
99
$1
,50
0-
$1
,99
9$
2,0
00
-$
2,4
99
$2
,50
0-
$2
,99
9$
3,0
00
-$
3,4
99
$3
,50
0-
$3
,99
9$
4,0
00
-$
4,9
99
$5
,00
0-
$7
,49
9$
7,5
00
-$
9,9
99
$1
0,0
00
+
PERCENT OF ENRO
AN
NU
AL
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
(D
OL
LA
RS
)
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
NO
TE
: D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
OR
IGIN
AL,
PA
ID C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E, E
XC
LUD
E P
AC
EN
ET
CLA
IMS
.
24
36.4
%
26.3
%
20
%
25
%
30
%
35
%
40
%
OLLED CARDHOLDERS
FIG
UR
E 2
.3D
IST
RIB
UT
ION
OF
PA
CE
NE
T A
NN
UA
L B
EN
EF
ITJ
AN
UA
RY
-D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
01
5N
= 1
76
,43
8
AV
ER
AG
E A
NN
UA
L P
AC
EN
ET
BE
NE
FIT
= $
68
3.6
9
8.6%
9.0%
5.2%
4.0%
4.1%
1.9%
1.0%
0.7%
0.9%
1.0%
0.4%
0.5%
0%
5%
10
%
15
%
$0
$
1-$
24
9$
25
0-
$4
99
$5
00
-$
99
9$
1,0
00
-$
1,4
99
$1
,50
0-
$1
,99
9$
2,0
00
-$
2,4
99
$2
,50
0-
$2
,99
9$
3,0
00
-$
3,4
99
$3
,50
0-
$3
,99
9$
4,0
00
-$
4,9
99
$5
,00
0-
$7
,49
9$
7,5
00
-$
9,9
99
$1
0,0
00
+
PERCENT OF ENRO
AN
NU
AL
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
(D
OL
LA
RS
)S
OU
RC
E:
PD
A/C
LAIM
S H
IST
OR
YN
OT
E:
DA
TA
INC
LUD
E P
AC
EN
ET
OR
IGIN
AL,
PA
ID C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E, E
XC
LUD
E P
AC
E C
LAIM
S.
25
JAN - JUN JUL - DECCALENDAR
YEAR
TOTAL PRESCRIPTION COST (DATE OF SERVICE) 334,560,882$ 330,425,451$ 664,986,333$ MEDICARE PART D PREMIUMS 5,399,004 18,662,531 24,061,535
GROSS CLAIMS/PREMIUMS SUBTOTAL 339,959,886 349,087,982 689,047,868 96.8%
MHS CONTRACT OPERATIONS (INCLUDES POSTAGE) 8,439,664 6,756,666 15,196,330
GROSS CONTRACT SUBTOTAL 8,439,664 6,756,666 15,196,330 2.1%
PDA ADMINISTRATION PERSONNEL 562,025 542,056 1,104,081 OPERATIONS 96,083 11,151 107,234
GROSS PDA ADMIN. SUBTOTAL 658,108 553,207 1,211,315 0.2%
OTHER ADMINISTRATION AUDITS 377,500 307,500 685,000 THIRD PARTY RECOVERY 433,004 1,018,708 1,451,712
GROSS OTHER ADMIN. SUBTOTAL 810,504 1,326,208 2,136,712 0.3%
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INTERVENTIONS 222,111 412,378 634,489 0.1%
ENROLLMENT OUTREACH 1,218,616 1,060,326 2,278,942 0.3%
PRESCRIBER EDUCATION 750,000 625,000 1,375,000 0.2%
GROSS EXPENDITURES 352,058,889 359,821,767 711,880,656 100.0%
PRESCRIPTION COST OFFSETS PART D/OTHER PAYER OFFSETS (203,500,728) (199,905,352) (403,406,081) -56.7% CARDHOLDER COPAYMENTS (31,638,432) (29,710,323) (61,348,755) -8.6%
TOTAL OFFSETS (235,139,161) (229,615,675) (464,754,836) -65.3%
RECOVERIES MANUFACTURER REBATES (17,319,292) (23,778,295) (41,097,587) REFUNDS FROM PROVIDERS (2,336) (3,807) (6,143) AUDIT ADJUSTMENTS IN CHECKWRITES (500,726) (241,809) (742,535) THIRD-PARTY REIMBURSEMENTS AND TRANSFERS (16,620,266) 7,708,858 (8,911,408)
COMBINED RECOVERIES (34,442,620) (16,315,053) (50,757,673)
PRIOR YEARS' FUL REIMBURSEMENT REVISION 606,370 - 606,370 PRIOR YEARS' REBATE REFUNDS 382,611 113,686 496,297
NET RECOVERIES (33,453,639) (16,201,367) (49,655,006) -7.0%
NET PRESCRIPTION CLAIM EXPENDITURES STATE SHARE FOR RX BEFORE RECOVERIES 99,421,721 100,809,776 200,231,498 28.1% STATE SHARE FOR RX AFTER RECOVERIES 65,968,083 84,608,409 150,576,492 21.2%
NET STATE EXPENDITURES INCLUDING PREMIUMS
AND ADMINISTRATION 83,466,090$ 114,004,725$ 197,470,814$ 27.7%
AUDIT ADJUSTMENTS ARE BY RECOVERY DATE; AUDITS OCCURRED IN CY 2014 - 2015. REBATES ($41.1 M) ARE 20.5% OF TOTAL STATE SHARE PRESCRIPTION DRUG COST ($200.2 M). TOTAL PRESCRIPTION COST DOES NOT INCLUDE CLAIMS PROCESSED ONLY BY OTHER PAYERS.
TABLE 2.2TOTAL PRESCRIPTION COST, EXPENDITURES, OFFSETS, AND RECOVERIES
JANUARY - DECEMBER 2015
EXPENDITURES, RECOVERIES, OFFSETS% OF TOTAL
GROSS EXPENDITURES
NOTES: TABLE USES DATE OF SERVICE REFERENCE CLAIM COST FILE FOR ANNUAL DRUG EXPENDITURES.
26
EN
RO
LLM
EN
TC
LAIM
SG
RO
SS
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SN
ET
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S A
FT
ER
RE
CO
VE
RIE
S
DE
CE
MB
ER
19
88
E
NR
OL
LM
EN
T4
54
,42
8
19
88
CL
AIM
S1
1,4
96
,07
0
CS
FIG
UR
E 2
.4P
AC
E A
ND
PA
CE
NE
T E
NR
OL
LM
EN
T,
CL
AIM
S,
AN
D C
LA
IMS
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SB
Y C
AL
EN
DA
R Y
EA
R1
98
8-2
01
5
9
CA
LE
ND
AR
YE
AR
19
88
GR
OS
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E$
18
3,6
61
,89
4
19
88
NE
TE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E$
17
2,7
41
,33
1
DE
CE
MB
ER
20
15
E
NR
OL
LM
EN
T2
59
,25
8
20
15
CL
AIM
S8
,09
1,5
82
20
15
NE
TE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E$
16
1,8
87
,98
8
20
15
GR
OS
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E$
20
0,6
23
,46
7
En
rollm
en
t fig
ure
s re
pre
sen
t th
e n
um
be
r o
f en
rolle
d c
ard
ho
lde
rs a
t th
e e
nd
of
ea
ch r
ep
ort
ed
ca
len
da
r ye
ar.
Re
cove
rie
s in
clu
de
thir
d p
art
y p
aym
en
ts, m
an
ufa
ctu
rers
' re
ba
te, a
nd
re
stitu
tion
s.
So
urc
e:
P
AC
E B
ian
nu
al R
ep
ort
s, 1
98
8-1
99
5; P
AC
E A
nn
ua
l Re
po
rts,
19
96
-20
15
.
No
tes:
27
140,
000
165,
000
190,
000
215,
000
PERSONSF
IGU
RE
2.5
AP
AC
E T
OTA
L E
NR
OL
LE
D A
ND
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
S B
Y M
ON
TH
JA
NU
AR
Y 2
00
5 -
JA
NU
AR
Y 2
01
6
PA
CE
Enr
olle
dP
AC
E P
artic
ipat
ing
7.0%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
1.8%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
2.0%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
5.0%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
12.5
%D
EC
RE
AS
E
10.1
%D
EC
RE
AS
E
7.2%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
191,
938
188,
514
179,
105
156,
688
140,
908
154,
496
151,
363
135,
720
7.5%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
40,0
00
65,0
00
90,0
00
115,
000
NUMBER OF
SO
UR
CE
: E
ND
-OF
-MO
NT
H P
AC
E E
NR
OLL
ED
TA
KE
N F
RO
M M
R-0
-01A
RE
PO
RT
, PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
TA
KE
N F
RO
M C
LAIM
S H
IST
OR
Y B
AS
ED
ON
DA
TE
OF
SE
RV
ICE
1
8.1%
DE
CR
EA
SE
8.4%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
7.4%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
DE
CR
EA
SE
2.6%
D
EC
RE
AS
E9.
2%
DE
CR
EA
SE
7.7%
DE
CR
EA
SE
11.4
%D
EC
RE
AS
E
7.0%
IN
CR
EA
SE
3.8%
IN
CR
EA
SE
14.0
%
DE
CR
EA
SE
8.1%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
10.3
%
DE
CR
EA
SE
2014
15.5
%D
EC
RE
AS
E
2015
11.0
%D
EC
RE
AS
E
112,
513
109,
631
99,5
59
106,
548
97,9
30
130,
824
86,4
15
79,3
93
73,2
8064
,896
67,3
52
57,9
30
114,
691
101,
943
94,3
70
121,
013
28
100,
000
120,
000
140,
000
160,
000
180,
000
200,
000
OF PERSONSF
IGU
RE
2.5
BP
AC
EN
ET
TO
TAL
EN
RO
LL
ED
AN
D P
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
G C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
BY
MO
NT
HJ
AN
UA
RY
20
05
-J
AN
UA
RY
20
16
PA
CE
NE
T E
nrol
led
PA
CE
NE
T P
artic
ipat
ing
3.7%
4.2%
IN
CR
EA
SE
0.
5%
DE
CR
EA
SE
0.
5%
DE
CR
EA
SE
4.
9%
DE
CR
EA
SE
7.
3%
DE
CR
EA
SE
2.3%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
17.3
%
INC
RE
AS
E
12%
13.4
%
INC
RE
AS
E
13.8
%IN
CR
EA
SE
8.1%
INC
RE
AS
E
121,
887
178,
127
177,
303
120,
445
117,
329
176,
483
167,
862
109,
979
155,
575
152,
010
100,
075
118,
140
133,
987
110,
043
152,
476
164,
777
113,
994
117,
499
171,
007
3.8%
IN
CR
EA
SE
0
20,0
00
40,0
00
60,0
00
80,0
00
NUMBER O SO
UR
CE
: E
ND
-OF
-MO
NT
H P
AC
EN
ET
EN
RO
LLE
D T
AK
EN
FR
OM
MR
-0-0
1A R
EP
OR
T, P
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
G T
AK
EN
FR
OM
CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
BA
SE
D O
N D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E
1
INC
RE
AS
E3.
1%
INC
RE
AS
E
2.6%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
6.3%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
8.2%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
4.2%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
2005
2006
2007
2008
22.2
%
INC
RE
AS
E
2009
2010
2011
1.2%
D
EC
RE
AS
E
2012
9.1%
INC
RE
AS
E
2013
14.7
%IN
CR
EA
SE
2014
3.7%
INC
RE
AS
E
100,
939
96,6
58
72,0
06
87,9
86
95,9
80
2015
29
18.3
8
24.1
6
31.0
4
19.1
2
24.8
8
$2
0.0
0
$2
5.0
0
$3
0.0
0
$3
5.0
0
PRICE
Me
an
AW
P U
nit
Pri
ceM
ea
n A
MP
Un
it P
rice
TOTA
L IN
CR
EA
SE
IN M
EA
N A
WP
UN
IT
PR
ICE
OV
ER
16
YE
AR
S =
1,0
89.3
%
FIG
UR
E 2
.6A
PA
CE
AV
ER
AG
E W
HO
LE
SA
LE
PR
ICE
(A
WP
) A
ND
AV
ER
AG
E M
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
R'S
PR
ICE
(A
MP
) *
BR
AN
D P
RO
DU
CT
S O
NL
Y, B
Y Q
UA
RT
ER
JA
NU
AR
Y 2
00
0 -
DE
CE
MB
ER
20
15
2.61
2.90
3.42
4.04
4.52
5.41
6.37
7.75
9.09
10.4
911
.47
13.3
513
.54
14.2
1
2.00
2.25
2.63
3.10
3.52
4.21
4.94
6.06
7.51
8.14
8.82
10.2
110
.39
11.3
4
14.4
0
$0
.00
$5
.00
$1
0.0
0
$1
5.0
0
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
UNIT
TOTA
L IN
CR
EA
SE
IN M
EA
N A
MP
UN
IT
PR
ICE
OV
ER
16
YE
AR
S =
1,1
44.0
%
SO
UR
CE
: P
AC
E C
LAIM
S H
IST
OR
Y A
ND
MA
NU
FA
CT
UR
ER
S' R
EB
AT
E H
IST
OR
Y
* D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
CLA
IMS
FO
R N
DC
'S F
OR
WH
ICH
RE
BA
TE
AM
P D
AT
A A
RE
AV
AIL
AB
LE F
OR
AN
Y Q
UA
RT
ER
IN 2
000-
2015
.
30
1.94
2.07
2.16
2.44
2.94
2.92
3.11
3.17
$2
.00
$2
.50
$3
.00
$3
.50
PRICE
Me
an
AW
P U
nit
Pri
ceM
ea
n A
MP
Un
it P
rice
TOTA
L IN
CR
EA
SE
IN M
EA
N A
WP
UN
IT
PR
ICE
OV
ER
16
YE
AR
S =
328
.4%
FIG
UR
E 2
.6B
PA
CE
AV
ER
AG
E W
HO
LE
SA
LE
PR
ICE
(A
WP
) A
ND
AV
ER
AG
E M
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
R'S
PR
ICE
(A
MP
) *
GE
NE
RIC
PR
OD
UC
TS
ON
LY
, B
Y Q
UA
RT
ER
JA
NU
AR
Y 2
00
0 -
DE
CE
MB
ER
20
15
0.74
0.78
0.84
0.89
0.99
0.96
1.07
1.44
1.50
0.16
0.15
0.17
0.16
0.21
0.13
0.15
0.28
0.20
0.21
0.24
0.23
0.21
0.29
0.27
0.36
0.31
$0
.00
$0
.50
$1
.00
$1
.50
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
12
34
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
UNIT P
TOTA
L IN
CR
EA
SE
IN M
EA
N A
MP
UN
IT
PR
ICE
OV
ER
16
YE
AR
S =
93.
8%
SO
UR
CE
: P
AC
E C
LAIM
S H
IST
OR
Y A
ND
MA
NU
FA
CT
UR
ER
S' R
EB
AT
E H
IST
OR
Y
* D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
CLA
IMS
FO
R N
DC
'S F
OR
WH
ICH
RE
BA
TE
AM
P D
AT
A A
RE
AV
AIL
AB
LE F
OR
AN
Y Q
UA
RT
ER
IN 2
000-
2015
.
31
32
SECTION 3
PROGRAM DATA BY DATE OF
PAYMENT
33
34
PAGE 1
PACE PACENET
NUMBER OF SEMI-ANNUAL PROCESSED
PERIOD CLAIMS EXPENDITURES
JUL-DEC 1984 26 2,101,419 $20,714,685 $9.86
JAN-JUN 1985 26 3,475,440 $36,579,102 $10.53
1st YEAR TOTAL 5,576,859 $57,293,787 $10.27
JUL-DEC 1985 26 4,372,468 $50,616,334 $11.58
JAN-JUN 1986 26 4,966,536 $61,368,193 $12.36
2nd YEAR TOTAL 9,339,004 $111,984,527 $11.99
JUL-DEC 1986 26 5,237,141 $68,786,114 $13.13
JAN-JUN 1987 26 5,257,747 $72,761,148 $13.84
3rd YEAR TOTAL 10,494,888 $141,547,262 $13.49
JUL-DEC 1987 27 5,515,827 $80,237,477 $14.55
JAN-JUN 1988 25 5,440,743 $84,469,697 $15.53
4th YEAR TOTAL 10,956,570 $164,707,174 $15.03
JUL-DEC 1988 27 6,055,327 $99,192,197 $16.38
JAN-JUN 1989 26 5,937,088 $103,781,619 $17.48
5th YEAR TOTAL 11,992,415 $202,973,816 $16.93
JUL-DEC 1989 26 5,709,497 $106,600,899 $18.67
JAN-JUN 1990 26 5,544,295 $110,848,137 $19.99
6th YEAR TOTAL 11,253,792 $217,449,036 $19.32
JUL DEC 1990 26 5 352 797 $112 293 188 $20 98
CLAIM **PROCESSEDPER PROCESSED
CLAIM *OF
TABLE 3.1PACE AND PACENET CLAIMS AND EXPENDITURES PAID BY FISCAL YEAR
JULY 1984 - DECEMBER 2015
NUMBER NUMBER OF
EXPENDITURESPER PROCESSED
STATE SHARE STATE SHAREAVERAGE AVERAGE
WEEKS CLAIMS
JUL-DEC 1990 26 5,352,797 $112,293,188 $20.98
JAN-JUN 1991 26 5,453,044 $117,814,625 $21.61
7th YEAR TOTAL 10,805,841 $230,107,813 $21.29
JUL-DEC 1991 26 5,073,452 $115,304,410 $22.73
JAN-JUN 1992 26 4,816,750 $115,596,910 $24.00
8th YEAR TOTAL 9,890,202 $230,901,320 $23.35
JUL-DEC 1992 26 4,724,142 $115,980,339 $24.55
JAN-JUN 1993 26 4,403,096 $108,876,491 $24.73
9th YEAR TOTAL 9,127,238 $224,856,830 $24.64
JUL-DEC 1993 26 4,729,097 $118,778,523 $25.12
JAN-JUN 1994 26 4,341,896 $111,401,456 $25.66
10th YEAR TOTAL 9,070,993 $230,179,979 $25.38
JUL-DEC 1994 26 4,721,702 $122,294,905 $25.90
JAN-JUN 1995 27 4,228,653 $111,136,630 $26.28
11th YEAR TOTAL 8,950,355 $233,431,535 $26.08
JUL-DEC 1995 26 4,895,160 $131,701,547 $26.90
JAN-JUN 1996 26 4,443,096 $121,066,818 $27.25
12th YEAR TOTAL 9,338,256 $252,768,365 $27.07
JUL-DEC 1996 26 4,334,551 $119,612,179 $27.60 540 $23 $0.04
JAN-JUN 1997 26 4,523,225 $116,697,725 $25.80 74,647 $586,350 $7.85
13th YEAR TOTAL 8,857,776 $236,309,904 $26.68 75,187 $586,373 $7.80
JUL-DEC 1997 26 4,546,360 $121,880,844 $26.81 150,263 $2,680,675 $17.84
JAN-JUN 1998 26 4,497,031 $126,776,785 $28.19 171,797 $2,860,833 $16.65
14th YEAR TOTAL 9,043,391 $248,657,629 $27.50 322,060 $5,541,508 $17.21
35
PAGE 2
PACE PACENET
NUMBER OF SEMI-ANNUAL PROCESSED
PERIOD CLAIMS EXPENDITURES
JUL-DEC 1998 26 4,504,394 $134,229,706 $29.80 233,277 $4,737,561 $20.31
JAN-JUN 1999 26 4,220,448 $139,246,165 $32.99 256,109 $5,410,383 $21.13
15th YEAR TOTAL 8,724,842 $273,475,871 $31.34 489,386 $10,147,944 $20.74
JUL-DEC 1999 26 4,456,680 $153,781,999 $34.51 310,165 $7,421,422 $23.93
JAN-JUN 2000 26 4,453,977 $160,846,800 $36.11 339,250 $8,389,295 $24.73
8,910,657 $314,628,799 $35.31 649,415 $15,810,717 $24.35
JUL-DEC 2000 26 4,538,814 $170,118,213 $37.48 382,379 $10,200,170 $26.68
JAN-JUN 2001 26 4,536,651 $177,830,053 $39.20 420,529 $11,319,858 $26.92
9,075,465 $347,948,266 $38.34 802,908 $21,520,028 $26.80
JUL-DEC 2001 26 4,635,934 $189,489,307 $40.87 480,559 $13,924,106 $28.97
JAN-JUN 2002 26 4,554,962 $194,745,251 $42.75 542,321 $16,348,022 $30.14
9,190,896 $384,234,558 $41.81 1,022,880 $30,272,128 $29.59
JUL-DEC 2002 26 4,615,282 $203,947,092 $44.19 615,169 $20,100,929 $32.68
JAN-JUN 2003 26 4,554,809 $208,208,623 $45.71 644,320 $21,608,906 $33.54
19th YEAR TOTAL 9,170,091 $412,155,715 $44.95 1,259,489 $41,709,835 $33.12
JUL-DEC 2003 26 4,688,095 $221,734,037 $47.30 722,537 $25,698,628 $35.57
JAN-JUN 2004 26 4,581,399 $205,908,844 $44.94 1,268,014 $47,385,206 $37.37
20th YEAR TOTAL 9,269,494 $427,642,881 $46.13 1,990,551 $73,083,834 $36.72
STATE SHARE
TABLE 3.1
AVERAGE
PER PROCESSEDWEEKS CLAIM *
STATE SHARE NUMBER OF
PACE AND PACENET CLAIMS AND EXPENDITURES PAID BY FISCAL YEAR JULY 1984 - DECEMBER 2015
CLAIMS
18th YEAR TOTAL
EXPENDITURES CLAIM **
17th YEAR TOTAL
16th YEAR TOTAL
AVERAGENUMBER
OF PROCESSED PER PROCESSED
JUL-DEC 2004 26 4,646,945 $178,347,082 $38.38 1,922,663 $71,852,034 $37.37
JAN-JUN 2005 26 4,613,122 $166,886,748 $36.18 2,178,944 $81,479,300 $37.39
21st YEAR TOTAL 9,260,067 $345,233,830 $37.28 4,101,607 $153,331,334 $37.38
JUL-DEC 2005 26 4,632,516 $208,781,508 $45.07 2,451,200 $96,468,947 $39.36
JAN-JUN 2006 26 4,484,886 $196,409,910 $43.79 2,708,585 $100,489,805 $37.10
9,117,402 $405,191,418 $44.44 5,159,785 $196,958,752 $38.17
JUL-DEC 2006 26 4,074,738 $126,753,319 $31.11 2,686,230 $77,256,980 $28.76
JAN-JUN 2007 26 3,642,398 $82,054,486 $22.53 2,633,012 $59,270,762 $22.51
23rd YEAR TOTAL 7,717,136 $208,807,805 $27.06 5,319,242 $136,527,742 $25.67
JUL-DEC 2007 26 3,491,014 $99,077,033 $28.38 2,688,584 $85,271,656 $31.72
JAN-JUN 2008 26 3,015,416 $70,145,582 $23.26 2,947,413 $67,641,825 $22.95
24th YEAR TOTAL 6,506,430 $169,222,615 $26.01 5,635,997 $152,913,481 $27.13
JUL-DEC 2008 26 2,882,322 $76,213,073 $26.44 3,082,226 $89,890,137 $29.16
JAN-JUN 2009 26 2,675,602 $55,324,827 $20.68 2,960,252 $66,702,151 $22.53
25th YEAR TOTAL 5,557,924 $131,537,900 $23.67 6,042,478 $156,592,288 $25.92
JUL-DEC 2009 26 2,560,054 $63,361,329 $24.75 3,031,954 $91,430,885 $30.16
JAN-JUN 2010 26 2,380,428 $56,111,899 $23.57 2,824,223 $76,675,981 $27.15
26th YEAR TOTAL 4,940,482 $119,473,228 $24.18 5,856,177 $168,106,866 $28.71
JUL-DEC 2010 26 2,182,334 $61,837,441 $28.34 2,853,692 $101,435,537 $35.55
JAN-JUN 2011 26 2,226,942 $45,437,610 $20.40 3,102,948 $65,404,599 $21.08
27th YEAR TOTAL 4,409,276 $107,275,051 $24.33 5,956,640 $166,840,136 $28.01
JUL-DEC 2011 26 2,067,181 $42,933,134 $20.77 3,072,410 $63,057,042 $20.52JAN-JUN 2012 26 2,093,727 $42,352,837 $20.23 3,035,747 $64,106,702 $21.12
28th YEAR TOTAL 4,160,908 $85,285,971 $20.50 6,108,157 $127,163,744 $20.82
22nd YEAR TOTAL
36
PAGE 3
PACE PACENET
NUMBER OF SEMI-ANNUAL PROCESSED
PERIOD CLAIMS EXPENDITURES
JUL-DEC 2012 26 1,924,040 $36,823,185 $19.14 2,963,999 $58,046,309 $19.58JAN-JUN 2013 26 1,853,713 $36,063,995 $19.46 2,897,931 $57,828,530 $19.96
29th YEAR TOTAL 3,777,753 $72,887,180 $19.29 5,861,930 $115,874,839 $19.77
JUL-DEC 2013 26 1,597,139 $31,742,735 $19.87 2,702,648 $55,057,471 $20.37JAN-JUN 2014 26 1,618,419 $32,581,671 $20.13 2,725,253 $59,253,137 $21.74
30th YEAR TOTAL 3,215,558 $64,324,406 $20.00 5,427,901 $114,310,608 $21.06
JUL-DEC 2014 26 1,502,786 $33,987,697 $22.62 2,747,734 $64,145,379 $23.34JAN-JUN 2015 26 1,624,984 $38,884,586 $23.93 2,416,591 $58,704,418 $24.29
3,127,770 $72,872,283 $23.30 5,164,325 $122,849,797 $23.79
JUL-DEC 2015 26 1,516,584 $38,439,507 $25.35 2,460,486 $62,701,593 $25.481,516,584 $38,439,507 $25.35 2,460,486 $62,701,593 $25.48
CUMULATIVE TOTAL 252,346,315 $6,763,806,260 $26.80 69,706,601 $1,872,843,547 $26.87
N b 22 1996 D b 31 2003 Th l f ith th AWP i 10% l $3 50 di i f th U&C th bt ti $6 00
July 1, 1985 - June 1991: The lesser of either the AWP plus a $2.75 dispensing fee or the U&C, then subtracting a $4.00 cardholder payment.
July 1, 1991 - November 21, 1996: Same as above with copayment increased to $6.00.
STATE SHARE
32nd YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL
JULY 1984 - DECEMBER 2015
AVERAGE
EXPENDITURES CLAIM **PROCESSED
AVERAGENUMBER STATE SHARE NUMBER OF
* The State Share is the amount paid by the PACE Program for each claim. The State Share per processed claim does not reflect rebates from manufacturers, recoupments from insurance carriers, or audit disallowances received from providers and enrollees. The number of claims includes all original, debit, credit and void claims. Some claims, therefore, do not have a payment associated with them. The State Share per original, paid claim would be higher than the values shown on this table.
CLAIMS
TABLE 3.1PACE AND PACENET CLAIMS AND EXPENDITURES PAID BY FISCAL YEAR
PER PROCESSED
Reimbursement formulas for PACE:
July 1, 1984 - June 1985: The lesser of either the Average Wholesale Price (AWP) plus a $2.50 dispensing fee or the Usual and Customary Charge (U&C), then subtracting a $4.00 cardholder payment.
WEEKS CLAIM *PER PROCESSED
31st YEAR TOTAL
OF
SOURCE: PDA/MRW200-01 & MRM730-01
November 22, 1996 - December 31, 2003: The lesser of either the AWP minus 10% plus a $3.50 dispensing fee, or the U&C, then subtracting a $6.00 copayment.
January 1, 2004 - July 9, 2006: The lesser of either AWP minus 10% plus a $4.00 dispensing fee, or the U&C, or the FUL for a generic product plus a $4.00 dispensing fee, then subtracting a copayment of $8.00 for generics and $15.00 for brand products. The copayment can be adjusted annually.
July 10, 2006 - Present: The lesser of either AWP minus 12% plus a $4.00 dispensing fee, or the U&C, or the FUL for a generic product plus a $4.00 dispensing fee, then subtracting a copayment of $8.00 for generics and $15.00 for brand products. The copayment can be adjusted annually.
September 2006 - Present: Program providers are required to accept the Medicare Part D Plan reimbursements for those claims in the coverage phase received by cardholders who are enrolled in both Medicare Part D and the PACE/PACENET Program. These Part D Plan reimbursements are comparable to the average commercial rate of AWP minus 17% plus a $2.00 dispensing fee. The Program reimburses at AWP minus 12% plus a $4.00 dispensing fee for claims not covered by an enrollee’s Part D Plan.
June 2004 - Present: Average state share per claim reflects savings from Medicare Part D.
June 2004 - December 2005: Average PACE state share per claim reflects additional savings from the Transitional Assistance benefit for Medicare Discount Program cardholders.
September 2006 - Present: Program providers are required to accept the Medicare Part D Plan reimbursements for those claims in the coverage phase received by cardholders who are enrolled in both Medicare Part D and the PACE/PACENET Program. These Part D Plan reimbursements are comparable to the average commercial rate of AWP minus 17% plus a $2.00 dispensing fee. The Program reimburses at AWP minus 12% plus a $4.00 dispensing fee for claims not covered by an enrollee’s Part D Plan.
June 2004 - Present: Average state share per claim reflects savings from Medicare Part D.
** The State Share is the amount paid by the PACENET Program when the cost of the claim(s) exceeds the monthly deductible premium amount plus the copayment. The number of processed claims includes all original, debit, credit and void claims and claims without a State Share payment in the premium deductible phases and all other claims with a State Share payment. Therefore, the State Share per claim on this table is lower than the State Share for claims beyond the premium deductible phase. The State Share per processed claim does not reflect rebates from manufacturers, recoupments from insurance carriers, or audit disallowances received from providers.
Reimbursement formulas for PACENET:
November 22, 1996 - December 31, 2003: The lesser of either AWP minus 10% plus a $3.50 dispensing fee, or the U&C, then subtracting a copayment of $8.00 for generics and $15 for brand products.
January 1, 2004 - July 9, 2006: The lesser of either AWP minus 10% plus a $4.00 dispensing fee, or the U&C, or the Federal Upper Limit (FUL) for a generic product plus a $4.00 dispensing fee, then subtracting a copayment of $6.00 for generics and $9.00 for brand products. The copayment can be adjusted annually.
37
PA
GE
1
% O
FA
LLM
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
RP
RO
DU
CT
ST
RE
NG
TH
ND
C9
CLA
IMS
CLA
IMS
PR
OD
UC
T D
ES
CR
IPT
ION
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMS
PIR
IVA
18 M
CG
0059
7007
5$2
,143
,520
2.70
121
,909
0.68
3R
ES
PIR
AT
OR
Y A
GE
NT
GLA
XO
SM
ITH
KLI
NE
AD
VA
IR D
ISK
US
250-
50 M
CG
0017
3069
6$1
,255
,560
1.58
215
,095
0.47
12R
ES
PIR
AT
OR
Y A
GE
NT
SA
NO
FI-
AV
EN
TIS
LAN
TU
S S
OLO
ST
AR
100/
ML
0008
8221
9$1
,227
,403
1.54
311
,331
0.35
27D
IAB
ET
ES
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
ME
RC
KZ
ET
IA10
MG
6658
2041
4$1
,145
,359
1.44
416
,049
0.50
10LI
PID
-LO
WE
RIN
G A
GE
NT
TE
VA
ES
OM
EP
RA
ZO
LE M
AG
NE
SIU
M40
MG
0009
3645
1$1
,132
,985
1.42
58,
105
0.25
49G
AS
TR
OIN
TE
ST
INA
L A
GE
NT
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AN
EX
IUM
40 M
G00
1865
040
$1,1
06,9
501.
396
15,0
590.
4713
GA
ST
RO
INT
ES
TIN
AL
AG
EN
T
ME
RC
KJA
NU
VIA
100
MG
0000
6027
7$8
71,7
781.
107
9,69
40.
3037
DIA
BE
TE
S T
RE
AT
ME
NT
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AC
RE
ST
OR
10 M
G00
3100
751
$750
,572
0.94
811
,942
0.37
22LI
PID
-LO
WE
RIN
G A
GE
NT
GIL
EA
D S
CIE
NC
ES
HA
RV
ON
I90
MG
-400
MG
6195
8180
1$7
45,3
560.
949
450.
004,
208
HE
PA
TIT
IS C
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
JOH
NS
ON
& J
OH
NS
ON
XA
RE
LTO
20 M
G50
4580
579
$657
,087
0.83
106,
711
0.21
78A
NT
ICO
AG
ULA
NT
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMT
RA
DJE
NT
A5
MG
0059
7014
0$6
33,3
200.
8011
4,66
50.
1414
6D
IAB
ET
ES
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
SA
NO
FI-
AV
EN
TIS
LAN
TU
S10
0/M
L00
0882
220
$623
,066
0.78
126,
755
0.21
77D
IAB
ET
ES
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
NO
VO
LOG
FLE
XP
EN
100/
ML
0016
9633
9$5
74,1
560.
7213
4,69
20.
1414
3D
IAB
ET
ES
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AS
YM
BIC
OR
T16
0-4.
5MC
G00
1860
370
$572
,538
0.72
146,
457
0.20
81R
ES
PIR
AT
OR
Y A
GE
NT
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
LEV
EM
IR F
LEX
TO
UC
H10
0/M
L00
1696
438
$566
,647
0.71
154,
912
0.15
129
DIA
BE
TE
S T
RE
AT
ME
NT
ALL
ER
GA
NLU
MIG
AN
0.00
0100
0233
205
$536
,985
0.68
169,
787
0.30
36G
LAU
CO
MA
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AC
RE
ST
OR
5 M
G00
3100
755
$532
,933
0.67
178,
251
0.25
47LI
PID
-LO
WE
RIN
G A
GE
NT
FO
RE
ST
NA
ME
ND
A X
R28
MG
0045
6342
8$5
22,1
080.
6618
4,70
10.
1514
1A
LZH
EIM
ER
'S D
ISE
AS
E T
RE
AT
ME
NT
ME
RC
KJA
NU
VIA
50 M
G00
0060
112
$514
,372
0.65
196,
006
0.19
89D
IAB
ET
ES
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
AS
TE
LLA
SV
ES
ICA
RE
5 M
G51
2480
150
$480
,843
0.60
206,
003
0.19
90O
VE
RA
CT
IVE
BLA
DD
ER
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
FO
RE
ST
NA
ME
ND
A10
MG
0045
6321
0$4
78,9
650.
6021
5,26
60.
1611
2A
LZH
EIM
ER
'S D
ISE
AS
E T
RE
AT
ME
NT
ALL
ER
GA
NR
ES
TA
SIS
0.00
0500
0239
163
$469
,012
0.59
224,
484
0.14
153
DR
Y E
YE
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
AM
GE
NE
NB
RE
L50
MG
/ML
5840
6044
5$4
67,9
620.
5923
348
0.01
1,55
4D
ISE
AS
E-M
OD
IFY
ING
AN
TIR
HE
UM
AT
IC D
RU
G
JOH
NS
ON
& J
OH
NS
ON
ZY
TIG
A25
0 M
G57
8940
150
$431
,981
0.54
2412
20.
002,
766
PR
OS
TA
TE
CA
NC
ER
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
BR
IST
OL-
MY
ER
S S
QU
IBB
ELI
QU
IS5
MG
0000
3089
4$4
28,8
600.
5425
4,88
90.
1513
0A
NT
ICO
AG
ULA
NT
JOH
NS
ON
& J
OH
NS
ON
XA
RE
LTO
15 M
G50
4580
578
$424
,714
0.53
264,
110
0.13
168
AN
TIC
OA
GU
LAN
T
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AC
RE
ST
OR
20 M
G00
3100
752
$422
,970
0.53
276,
856
0.21
75LI
PID
-LO
WE
RIN
G A
GE
NT
GLA
XO
SM
ITH
KLI
NE
AD
VA
IR D
ISK
US
500-
50 M
CG
0017
3069
7$4
22,1
860.
5328
3,79
70.
1218
3R
ES
PIR
AT
OR
Y A
GE
NT
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMP
RA
DA
XA
150
MG
0059
7013
5$4
07,4
330.
5129
4,27
70.
1316
1A
NT
ICO
AG
ULA
NT
ALC
ON
TR
AV
AT
AN
Z0.
0000
400
0650
260
$387
,663
0.49
308,
095
0.25
50G
LAU
CO
MA
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
BY
% O
F A
LLR
AN
K B
YR
AN
K
TA
BL
E 3
.2A
PA
CE
HIG
H E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E A
ND
HIG
H V
OL
UM
E C
LA
IMS
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
EX
PE
ND
I-E
XP
EN
DI-
TU
RE
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
EV
OLU
ME
TU
RE
38
PA
GE
2
% O
FA
LLM
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
RP
RO
DU
CT
ST
RE
NG
TH
ND
C9
CLA
IMS
CLA
IMS
PR
OD
UC
T D
ES
CR
IPT
ION
BY
% O
F A
LLR
AN
K B
YR
AN
K
TA
BL
E 3
.2A
PA
CE
HIG
H E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E A
ND
HIG
H V
OL
UM
E C
LA
IMS
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
EX
PE
ND
I-E
XP
EN
DI-
TU
RE
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
EV
OLU
ME
TU
RE
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMC
OM
BIV
EN
T R
ES
PIM
AT
20-1
00 M
CG
0059
7002
4$3
83,8
490.
4831
4,46
10.
1415
4R
ES
PIR
AT
OR
Y A
GE
NT
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMA
GG
RE
NO
X25
MG
-200
MG
0059
7000
1$3
76,5
120.
4732
3,32
00.
1021
0A
NT
IPLA
TE
LET
AG
EN
T
BR
IST
OL-
MY
ER
S S
QU
IBB
ELI
QU
IS2.
5 M
G00
0030
893
$368
,636
0.46
333,
993
0.12
172
AN
TIC
OA
GU
LAN
T
AU
RO
BIN
DO
CLO
PID
OG
RE
L75
MG
6586
2035
7$3
54,8
210.
4534
17,5
850.
546
AN
TIP
LAT
ELE
T A
GE
NT
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
NO
VO
LOG
MIX
70-
30 F
LEX
PE
N70
-30/
ML
0016
9369
6$3
54,1
950.
4535
2,31
50.
0730
1D
IAB
ET
ES
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
ELI
LIL
LYH
UM
ALO
G K
WIK
PE
N U
-100
100/
ML
0000
2879
9$3
44,3
750.
4336
2,03
80.
0635
0D
IAB
ET
ES
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
ME
RC
KV
YT
OR
IN10
MG
-40M
G66
5820
313
$340
,883
0.43
372,
120
0.07
337
LIP
ID-L
OW
ER
ING
AG
EN
T
AP
OT
EX
AT
OR
VA
ST
AT
IN C
ALC
IUM
20 M
G60
5052
579
$340
,606
0.43
3816
,971
0.52
7LI
PID
-LO
WE
RIN
G A
GE
NT
TA
KE
DA
DE
XIL
AN
T60
MG
6476
4017
5$3
22,1
540.
4139
4,42
50.
1415
5G
AS
TR
OIN
TE
ST
INA
L A
GE
NT
DA
IICH
I SA
NK
YO
BE
NIC
AR
40 M
G65
5970
104
$320
,331
0.40
404,
965
0.15
127
AN
GIO
TE
NS
IN II
RE
CE
PT
OR
AN
TA
G.
AS
TE
LLA
SV
ES
ICA
RE
10 M
G51
2480
151
$311
,144
0.39
413,
893
0.12
176
OV
ER
AC
TIV
E B
LAD
DE
R T
RE
AT
ME
NT
ME
RC
KV
YT
OR
IN10
MG
-20M
G66
5820
312
$302
,981
0.38
421,
954
0.06
369
LIP
ID-L
OW
ER
ING
AG
EN
T
AP
OT
EX
AT
OR
VA
ST
AT
IN C
ALC
IUM
40 M
G60
5052
580
$286
,953
0.36
4314
,033
0.43
14LI
PID
-LO
WE
RIN
G A
GE
NT
AP
OT
EX
CLO
PID
OG
RE
L75
MG
6050
5025
3$2
73,8
600.
3444
10,8
140.
3328
AN
TIP
LAT
ELE
T A
GE
NT
AU
RO
BIN
DO
PA
NT
OP
RA
ZO
LE S
OD
IUM
40 M
G65
8620
560
$272
,958
0.34
459,
027
0.28
41G
AS
TR
OIN
TE
ST
INA
L A
GE
NT
SO
LCO
HE
ALT
HC
AR
ED
ON
EP
EZ
IL H
CL
10 M
G43
5470
276
$266
,321
0.33
4610
,516
0.32
29A
LZH
EIM
ER
'S D
ISE
AS
E T
RE
AT
ME
NT
AB
BO
TT
HU
MIR
A P
EN
PS
OR
IAS
IS40
MG
/0.8
ML
0007
4433
9$2
61,5
850.
3347
296
0.01
1,71
9D
ISE
AS
E-M
OD
IFY
ING
AN
TIR
HE
UM
AT
IC D
RU
G
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
VIC
TO
ZA
3-P
AK
0.6M
G/0
.100
1694
060
$259
,046
0.33
481,
339
0.04
543
DIA
BE
TE
S T
RE
AT
ME
NT
PR
AS
CO
CO
LCH
ICIN
E0.
6 M
G66
9930
165
$253
,876
0.32
492,
601
0.08
273
AN
TIG
OU
T A
GE
NT
FO
RE
ST
BY
ST
OLI
C10
MG
0045
6141
0$2
43,5
810.
3150
3,97
10.
1217
3B
ET
A B
LOC
KE
R
GLA
XO
SM
ITH
KLI
NE
VE
NT
OLI
N H
FA
90 M
CG
0017
3068
2$2
33,5
800.
2955
12,3
620.
3819
RE
SP
IRA
TO
RY
AG
EN
T
MY
LAN
PA
NT
OP
RA
ZO
LE S
OD
IUM
40 M
G00
3786
689
$231
,540
0.29
568,
445
0.26
44G
AS
TR
OIN
TE
ST
INA
L A
GE
NT
AP
OT
EX
AT
OR
VA
ST
AT
IN C
ALC
IUM
10 M
G60
5052
578
$226
,879
0.29
6015
,144
0.47
11LI
PID
-LO
WE
RIN
G A
GE
NT
TE
VA
PR
OA
IR H
FA
90 M
CG
5931
0057
9$1
76,3
170.
2288
10,0
080.
3132
RE
SP
IRA
TO
RY
AG
EN
T
AP
OT
EX
OM
EP
RA
ZO
LE20
MG
6050
5006
5$1
28,7
170.
1611
112
,129
0.37
21G
AS
TR
OIN
TE
ST
INA
L A
GE
NT
KR
EM
ER
S U
RB
AN
OM
EP
RA
ZO
LE20
MG
6217
5011
8$1
18,2
430.
1512
09,
954
0.31
33G
AS
TR
OIN
TE
ST
INA
L A
GE
NT
SA
ND
OZ
PO
TA
SS
IUM
CH
LOR
IDE
20 M
EQ
0078
1572
0$6
6,83
00.
0822
713
,053
0.40
16E
LEC
TR
OLY
TE
TO
RR
EN
TIS
OS
OR
BID
E M
ON
ON
ITR
AT
E E
R30
MG
1366
8010
4$5
8,48
30.
0725
08,
570
0.26
43N
ITR
AT
E
MY
LAN
LEV
OT
HY
RO
XIN
E S
OD
IUM
50 M
CG
0037
8180
3$4
6,71
90.
0629
119
,363
0.60
4T
HY
RO
ID R
EP
LAC
EM
EN
T
MY
LAN
LEV
OT
HY
RO
XIN
E S
OD
IUM
75 M
CG
0037
8180
5$4
4,62
10.
0630
616
,184
0.50
9T
HY
RO
ID R
EP
LAC
EM
EN
T
39
PA
GE
3
% O
FA
LLM
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
RP
RO
DU
CT
ST
RE
NG
TH
ND
C9
CLA
IMS
CLA
IMS
PR
OD
UC
T D
ES
CR
IPT
ION
BY
% O
F A
LLR
AN
K B
YR
AN
K
TA
BL
E 3
.2A
PA
CE
HIG
H E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
E A
ND
HIG
H V
OL
UM
E C
LA
IMS
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
EX
PE
ND
I-E
XP
EN
DI-
TU
RE
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
EV
OLU
ME
TU
RE
DR
RE
DD
Y'S
OM
EP
RA
ZO
LE20
MG
5511
1015
8$3
4,93
70.
0437
923
,187
0.72
1G
AS
TR
OIN
TE
ST
INA
L A
GE
NT
MY
LAN
LEV
OT
HY
RO
XIN
E S
OD
IUM
100
MC
G00
3781
809
$31,
448
0.04
419
11,4
360.
3526
TH
YR
OID
RE
PLA
CE
ME
NT
TE
VA
VIT
AM
IN D
250
000
UN
IT50
1110
990
$28,
611
0.04
449
9,68
90.
3038
VIT
AM
IN S
UP
PLE
ME
NT
MY
LAN
LEV
OT
HY
RO
XIN
E S
OD
IUM
25 M
CG
0037
8180
0$2
2,28
10.
0355
210
,279
0.32
30T
HY
RO
ID R
EP
LAC
EM
EN
T
TE
VA
TR
AM
AD
OL
HC
L50
MG
0009
3005
8$8
,837
0.01
1,14
411
,820
0.37
24A
NA
LGE
SIC
NA
RC
OT
IC A
GE
NT
CA
MB
ER
AM
LOD
IPIN
E B
ES
YLA
TE
5 M
G31
7220
238
$7,1
230.
011,
346
18,4
970.
575
CA
LCIU
M C
HA
NN
EL
BLO
CK
ER
CA
MB
ER
AM
LOD
IPIN
E B
ES
YLA
TE
10 M
G31
7220
239
$6,8
250.
011,
397
11,8
230.
3723
CA
LCIU
M C
HA
NN
EL
BLO
CK
ER
MY
LAN
ME
TO
PR
OLO
L T
AR
TR
AT
E25
MG
0037
8001
8$6
,409
0.01
1,47
622
,821
0.71
2B
ET
A B
LOC
KE
R
WA
TS
ON
LOR
AZ
EP
AM
0.5
MG
0059
1024
0$5
,136
0.01
1,69
411
,661
0.36
25A
NX
IOLY
TIC
CA
RA
CO
ME
TO
PR
OLO
L T
AR
TR
AT
E25
MG
5766
4050
6$4
,181
0.01
1,95
513
,424
0.41
15B
ET
A B
LOC
KE
R
ZY
DU
SA
MLO
DIP
INE
BE
SY
LAT
E5
MG
6838
2012
2$3
,900
0.00
2,04
68,
889
0.27
42C
ALC
IUM
CH
AN
NE
L B
LOC
KE
R
MY
LAN
ME
TO
PR
OLO
L T
AR
TR
AT
E50
MG
0037
8003
2$2
,811
0.00
2,42
79,
808
0.30
35B
ET
A B
LOC
KE
R
TE
VA
ME
TO
PR
OLO
L T
AR
TR
AT
E50
MG
0009
3073
3$1
,637
0.00
3,18
48,
286
0.26
46B
ET
A B
LOC
KE
R
LUP
INLI
SIN
OP
RIL
20 M
G68
1800
515
$1,6
020.
003,
208
12,4
350.
3818
AC
E IN
HIB
ITO
R
SA
ND
OZ
FU
RO
SE
MID
E40
MG
0078
1196
6$1
,102
0.00
3,68
216
,275
0.50
8D
IUR
ET
IC
QU
ALI
TE
ST
FU
RO
SE
MID
E40
MG
0060
3374
0$7
550.
004,
237
9,05
60.
2840
DIU
RE
TIC
SA
ND
OZ
AT
EN
OLO
L50
MG
0078
1150
6$7
170.
004,
317
8,13
00.
2548
BE
TA
BLO
CK
ER
MY
LAN
FU
RO
SE
MID
E40
MG
0037
8021
6$5
840.
004,
571
9,95
10.
3134
DIU
RE
TIC
LUP
INLI
SIN
OP
RIL
10 M
G68
1800
514
$488
0.00
4,85
312
,165
0.38
20A
CE
INH
IBIT
OR
SA
ND
OZ
FU
RO
SE
MID
E20
MG
0078
1181
8$4
630.
004,
939
12,9
270.
4017
DIU
RE
TIC
MY
LAN
FU
RO
SE
MID
E20
MG
0037
8020
8$4
190.
005,
110
9,32
90.
2939
DIU
RE
TIC
QU
ALI
TE
ST
FU
RO
SE
MID
E20
MG
0060
3373
9$3
970.
005,
185
10,2
020.
3231
DIU
RE
TIC
LUP
INLI
SIN
OP
RIL
5 M
G68
1800
513
$188
0.00
6,12
28,
399
0.26
45A
CE
INH
IBIT
OR
TO
TA
L $2
8,67
6,73
336
.06
746,
751
23.0
8
83 P
RO
DU
CT
S
TO
TA
L $7
9,51
8,43
610
0.00
3,23
6,15
410
0.00
ALL
PR
OD
UC
TS
NO
TE
: DA
TA
INC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
CLA
IMS
BY
DA
TE
OF
PA
YM
EN
T F
OR
PA
CE
ON
LY, E
XC
LUD
ING
PA
CE
NE
T.
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
40
PA
GE
1
ST
AT
ER
AN
K B
YC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SH
AR
ET
OT
AL
% O
FE
XP
EN
DI-
% O
FM
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
RP
RO
DU
CT
ST
RE
NG
TH
ND
C9
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
ST
OT
AL
TU
RE
SC
LAIM
S
TO
TA
L
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMS
PIR
IVA
18 M
CG
0059
7007
5$9
,819
,047
.54
$3,9
52,1
29.0
5$1
3,77
1,17
6.59
3.29
138
,529
0.79
1
SA
NO
FI-
AV
EN
TIS
LAN
TU
S S
OLO
ST
AR
100/
ML
0008
8221
9$8
,656
,443
.94
$3,0
24,8
35.4
3$1
1,68
1,27
9.37
2.52
224
,531
0.51
7
GLA
XO
SM
ITH
KLI
NE
AD
VA
IR D
ISK
US
250-
50 M
CG
0017
3069
6$6
,229
,062
.72
$2,3
74,8
31.8
2$8
,603
,894
.54
1.98
324
,979
0.52
6
ME
RC
KZ
ET
IA10
MG
6658
2041
4$4
,696
,983
.76
$1,8
73,1
18.4
9$6
,570
,102
.25
1.56
422
,887
0.47
9
SA
NO
FI-
AV
EN
TIS
LAN
TU
S10
0/M
L00
0882
220
$4,8
24,9
65.1
1$1
,596
,361
.26
$6,4
21,3
26.3
71.
335
13,6
070.
2839
ME
RC
KJA
NU
VIA
100
MG
0000
6027
7$5
,221
,051
.64
$1,5
56,9
30.0
7$6
,777
,981
.71
1.30
615
,964
0.33
27
TE
VA
ES
OM
EP
RA
ZO
LE M
AG
NE
SIU
M40
MG
0009
3645
1$1
,275
,515
.39
$1,3
27,1
28.1
7$2
,602
,643
.56
1.11
710
,028
0.21
72
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
LEV
EM
IR F
LEX
TO
UC
H10
0/M
L00
1696
438
$4,4
93,9
58.6
2$1
,321
,365
.39
$5,8
15,3
24.0
11.
108
11,2
490.
2354
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
NO
VO
LOG
FLE
XP
EN
100/
ML
0016
9633
9$4
,138
,685
.11
$1,2
91,6
37.3
6$5
,430
,322
.47
1.08
910
,030
0.21
71
JOH
NS
ON
& J
OH
NS
ON
XA
RE
LTO
20 M
G50
4580
579
$3,5
85,7
28.7
1$1
,201
,619
.66
$4,7
87,3
48.3
71.
0010
12,3
960.
2645
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AN
EX
IUM
40 M
G00
1865
040
$4,2
87,0
28.5
0$1
,200
,184
.51
$5,4
87,2
13.0
11.
0011
16,2
300.
3324
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AC
RE
ST
OR
10 M
G00
3100
751
$3,3
79,4
02.1
5$9
98,5
81.9
9$4
,377
,984
.14
0.83
1216
,085
0.33
26
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AS
YM
BIC
OR
T16
0-4.
5MC
G00
1860
370
$2,5
82,5
92.9
8$9
84,4
96.5
2$3
,567
,089
.50
0.82
1311
,768
0.24
48
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMT
RA
DJE
NT
A5
MG
0059
7014
0$2
,104
,310
.98
$983
,534
.29
$3,0
87,8
45.2
70.
8214
7,85
40.
1611
4
BR
IST
OL-
MY
ER
S S
QU
IBB
ELI
QU
IS5
MG
0000
3089
4$2
,470
,358
.78
$901
,368
.77
$3,3
71,7
27.5
50.
7515
9,29
40.
1986
ME
RC
KJA
NU
VIA
50 M
G00
0060
112
$2,8
60,0
38.9
7$8
95,7
65.7
3$3
,755
,804
.70
0.75
169,
117
0.19
90
GLA
XO
SM
ITH
KLI
NE
AD
VA
IR D
ISK
US
500-
50 M
CG
0017
3069
7$2
,318
,775
.82
$885
,178
.83
$3,2
03,9
54.6
50.
7417
7,02
30.
1413
8
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
NO
VO
LOG
MIX
70-
30 F
LEX
PE
N70
-30/
ML
0016
9369
6$2
,419
,496
.57
$819
,736
.49
$3,2
39,2
33.0
60.
6818
4,46
40.
0923
9
ELI
LIL
LYH
UM
ALO
G K
WIK
PE
N U
-100
100/
ML
0000
2879
9$1
,753
,034
.25
$811
,292
.67
$2,5
64,3
26.9
20.
6819
4,59
50.
0923
0
FO
RE
ST
NA
ME
ND
A10
MG
0045
6321
0$1
,858
,963
.98
$796
,258
.72
$2,6
55,2
22.7
00.
6620
8,03
60.
1710
9
FO
RE
ST
NA
ME
ND
A X
R28
MG
0045
6342
8$1
,692
,878
.39
$784
,362
.63
$2,4
77,2
41.0
20.
6521
7,38
50.
1512
3
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMP
RA
DA
XA
150
MG
0059
7013
5$2
,080
,227
.26
$746
,307
.02
$2,8
26,5
34.2
80.
6222
7,49
20.
1512
1
AM
GE
NE
NB
RE
L50
MG
/ML
5840
6044
5$1
,907
,555
.44
$738
,174
.67
$2,6
45,7
30.1
10.
6123
786
0.02
1,16
9
GIL
EA
D S
CIE
NC
ES
HA
RV
ON
I90
MG
-400
MG
6195
8180
1$1
,685
,209
.37
$737
,118
.12
$2,4
22,3
27.4
90.
6124
750.
004,
037
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AC
RE
ST
OR
20 M
G00
3100
752
$2,3
70,8
68.8
2$7
31,9
88.4
8$3
,102
,857
.30
0.61
2511
,367
0.23
53
ALL
ER
GA
NLU
MIG
AN
0.00
0100
0233
205
$1,8
80,7
14.9
8$6
88,6
54.4
2$2
,569
,369
.40
0.57
2614
,139
0.29
35
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMC
OM
BIV
EN
T R
ES
PIM
AT
20-1
00 M
CG
0059
7002
4$1
,530
,894
.23
$677
,127
.14
$2,2
08,0
21.3
70.
5627
6,67
20.
1414
7
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
AC
RE
ST
OR
5 M
G00
3100
755
$1,9
06,8
92.3
7$6
69,4
98.0
2$2
,576
,390
.39
0.56
2810
,143
0.21
68
AS
TE
LLA
SV
ES
ICA
RE
5 M
G51
2480
150
$1,6
68,4
72.8
0$6
43,2
52.8
5$2
,311
,725
.65
0.54
297,
819
0.16
115
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IMA
GG
RE
NO
X25
MG
-200
MG
0059
7000
1$1
,521
,502
.73
$609
,507
.15
$2,1
31,0
09.8
80.
5130
4,86
60.
1021
7
VO
LUM
E
TA
BL
E 3
.2B
PA
CE
NE
T H
IGH
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
AN
D H
IGH
VO
LU
ME
CL
AIM
SJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
RA
NK
BY
41
PA
GE
2
ST
AT
ER
AN
K B
YC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SH
AR
ET
OT
AL
% O
FE
XP
EN
DI-
% O
FM
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
RP
RO
DU
CT
ST
RE
NG
TH
ND
C9
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
ST
OT
AL
TU
RE
SC
LAIM
S
TO
TA
LV
OLU
ME
TA
BL
E 3
.2B
PA
CE
NE
T H
IGH
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
AN
D H
IGH
VO
LU
ME
CL
AIM
SJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
RA
NK
BY
ALL
ER
GA
NR
ES
TA
SIS
0.05
0%00
0239
163
$2,2
46,9
46.5
7$6
09,2
33.9
3$2
,856
,180
.50
0.51
316,
069
0.13
167
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
VIC
TO
ZA
3-P
AK
0.6M
G/0
.100
1694
060
$1,7
93,9
65.2
3$6
03,2
83.8
7$2
,397
,249
.10
0.50
323,
503
0.07
318
JOH
NS
ON
& J
OH
NS
ON
XA
RE
LTO
15 M
G50
4580
578
$1,7
75,0
60.8
6$6
00,5
18.2
1$2
,375
,579
.07
0.50
336,
253
0.13
156
SA
NO
FI-
AV
EN
TIS
MU
LTA
Q40
0 M
G00
0244
142
$1,3
53,3
18.3
4$5
88,9
23.2
5$1
,942
,241
.59
0.49
343,
558
0.07
311
AS
TE
LLA
SX
TA
ND
I40
MG
0046
9012
5$1
,317
,050
.81
$565
,380
.51
$1,8
82,4
31.3
20.
4735
227
0.00
2,49
1
BR
IST
OL-
MY
ER
S S
QU
IBB
ELI
QU
IS2.
5 M
G00
0030
893
$1,6
55,4
32.8
9$5
61,1
98.4
0$2
,216
,631
.29
0.47
366,
284
0.13
155
JOH
NS
ON
& J
OH
NS
ON
ZY
TIG
A25
0 M
G57
8940
150
$1,5
36,9
33.6
4$5
51,9
93.1
7$2
,088
,926
.81
0.46
3728
50.
012,
254
GIL
EA
D S
CIE
NC
ES
RA
NE
XA
500
MG
6195
8100
3$1
,221
,082
.77
$537
,820
.57
$1,7
58,9
03.3
40.
4538
5,53
40.
1118
6
TA
KE
DA
DE
XIL
AN
T60
MG
6476
4017
5$1
,085
,986
.87
$517
,390
.23
$1,6
03,3
77.1
00.
4339
6,21
50.
1315
7
ALC
ON
TR
AV
AT
AN
Z0.
0000
400
0650
260
$1,3
32,1
06.2
6$5
16,1
45.4
1$1
,848
,251
.67
0.43
4010
,847
0.22
61
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
NO
VO
LOG
100/
ML
0016
9750
1$1
,620
,857
.53
$506
,635
.50
$2,1
27,4
93.0
30.
4241
5,18
50.
1120
5
ELI
LIL
LYF
OR
TE
O20
MC
G/D
OS
E00
0028
400
$1,3
09,7
44.0
7$4
55,7
12.8
1$1
,765
,456
.88
0.38
4288
70.
021,
077
PF
IZE
RLY
RIC
A75
MG
0007
1101
4$1
,098
,126
.73
$444
,620
.32
$1,5
42,7
47.0
50.
3743
4,20
30.
0925
3
AS
TE
LLA
SV
ES
ICA
RE
10 M
G51
2480
151
$1,1
96,7
14.0
7$4
41,4
70.1
8$1
,638
,184
.25
0.37
445,
548
0.11
185
ELI
LIL
LYH
UM
ALO
G M
IX 7
5-25
KW
IKP
EN
75-2
5/M
L00
0028
797
$922
,930
.17
$439
,006
.37
$1,3
61,9
36.5
40.
3745
1,87
30.
0458
5
AU
RO
BIN
DO
CLO
PID
OG
RE
L75
MG
6586
2035
7$2
94,3
84.1
5$4
34,2
91.2
7$7
28,6
75.4
20.
3646
27,2
750.
564
DA
IICH
I SA
NK
YO
BE
NIC
AR
40 M
G65
5970
104
$1,3
28,3
80.5
5$4
22,7
30.5
5$1
,751
,111
.10
0.35
477,
168
0.15
130
AB
BO
TT
HU
MIR
A P
EN
PS
OR
IAS
IS40
MG
/0.8
ML
0007
4433
9$2
,708
,391
.52
$420
,230
.86
$3,1
28,6
22.3
80.
3548
838
0.02
1,10
8
VA
LEA
NT
TA
RG
RE
TIN
75 M
G00
1875
526
$195
,736
.47
$414
,591
.95
$610
,328
.42
0.35
4928
0.00
5,57
9
PR
AS
CO
CO
LCH
ICIN
E0.
6 M
G66
9930
165
$344
,230
.95
$411
,193
.57
$755
,424
.52
0.34
504,
300
0.09
247
GLA
XO
SM
ITH
KLI
NE
VE
NT
OLI
N H
FA
90 M
CG
0017
3068
2$6
50,1
17.9
0$3
55,3
06.0
8$1
,005
,423
.98
0.30
5818
,951
0.39
17
AP
OT
EX
AT
OR
VA
ST
AT
IN C
ALC
IUM
20 M
G60
5052
579
$400
,548
.05
$285
,306
.75
$685
,854
.80
0.24
7322
,718
0.47
10
SO
LCO
HE
ALT
HC
AR
ED
ON
EP
EZ
IL H
CL
10 M
G43
5470
276
$144
,815
.67
$276
,403
.97
$421
,219
.64
0.23
7914
,935
0.31
30
AP
OT
EX
AT
OR
VA
ST
AT
IN C
ALC
IUM
40 M
G60
5052
580
$353
,822
.77
$269
,918
.71
$623
,741
.48
0.22
8421
,632
0.45
12
TE
VA
PR
OA
IR H
FA
90 M
CG
5931
0057
9$6
29,2
68.2
9$2
56,4
73.4
2$8
85,7
41.7
10.
2192
15,2
070.
3129
AP
OT
EX
CLO
PID
OG
RE
L75
MG
6050
5025
3$1
78,8
76.4
6$2
44,1
66.6
8$4
23,0
43.1
40.
2098
15,5
220.
3228
BE
CT
ON
DIC
KIN
SO
NB
D U
LTR
A-F
INE
PE
N N
EE
DLE
32G
X 5
/32"
0829
0320
1$4
05,0
18.9
6$2
38,2
22.2
0$6
43,2
41.1
60.
2010
014
,913
0.31
31
AP
OT
EX
OM
EP
RA
ZO
LE20
MG
6050
5006
5$1
34,6
05.7
7$1
73,6
99.4
2$3
08,3
05.1
90.
1413
018
,099
0.37
19
AP
OT
EX
AT
OR
VA
ST
AT
IN C
ALC
IUM
10 M
G60
5052
578
$226
,779
.27
$171
,729
.31
$398
,508
.58
0.14
132
20,3
640.
4213
AC
TA
VIS
TA
MS
ULO
SIN
HC
L0.
4 M
G00
2282
996
$294
,590
.10
$142
,751
.97
$437
,342
.07
0.12
156
13,6
180.
2838
42
PA
GE
3
ST
AT
ER
AN
K B
YC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SH
AR
ET
OT
AL
% O
FE
XP
EN
DI-
% O
FM
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
RP
RO
DU
CT
ST
RE
NG
TH
ND
C9
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
ST
OT
AL
TU
RE
SC
LAIM
S
TO
TA
LV
OLU
ME
TA
BL
E 3
.2B
PA
CE
NE
T H
IGH
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
AN
D H
IGH
VO
LU
ME
CL
AIM
SJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
RA
NK
BY
KR
EM
ER
S U
RB
AN
OM
EP
RA
ZO
LE20
MG
6217
5011
8$1
27,0
33.0
9$1
07,8
05.5
9$2
34,8
38.6
80.
0919
814
,625
0.30
32
SA
ND
OZ
PO
TA
SS
IUM
CH
LOR
IDE
20 M
EQ
0078
1572
0$3
57,3
44.3
5$6
9,33
8.35
$426
,682
.70
0.06
282
19,6
880.
4115
TO
RR
EN
TIS
OS
OR
BID
E M
ON
ON
ITR
AT
E E
R30
MG
1366
8010
4$1
76,7
35.8
9$5
5,01
6.00
$231
,751
.89
0.05
332
13,1
570.
2742
DR
RE
DD
Y'S
OM
EP
RA
ZO
LE20
MG
5511
1015
8$2
28,2
01.0
6$3
7,46
7.94
$265
,669
.00
0.03
473
31,7
230.
653
MY
LAN
LEV
OT
HY
RO
XIN
E S
OD
IUM
75 M
CG
0037
8180
5$3
14,3
08.8
5$2
8,63
6.52
$342
,945
.37
0.02
583
19,9
150.
4114
MY
LAN
LEV
OT
HY
RO
XIN
E S
OD
IUM
50 M
CG
0037
8180
3$3
27,9
14.2
2$2
7,19
7.39
$355
,111
.61
0.02
603
22,6
720.
4711
MY
LAN
LEV
OT
HY
RO
XIN
E S
OD
IUM
100
MC
G00
3781
809
$234
,144
.74
$23,
186.
82$2
57,3
31.5
60.
0268
714
,442
0.30
33
TE
VA
VIT
AM
IN D
250
000
UN
IT50
1110
990
$87,
485.
06$1
3,08
8.51
$100
,573
.57
0.01
1,06
111
,748
0.24
49
MY
LAN
LEV
OT
HY
RO
XIN
E S
OD
IUM
25 M
CG
0037
8180
0$1
71,1
88.6
6$1
2,19
0.77
$183
,379
.43
0.01
1,12
613
,178
0.27
41
TE
VA
TR
AM
AD
OL
HC
L50
MG
0009
3005
8$9
9,15
9.81
$6,4
48.3
6$1
05,6
08.1
70.
011,
747
16,6
910.
3423
WA
TS
ON
LOR
AZ
EP
AM
0.5
MG
0059
1024
0$7
9,78
4.49
$4,5
74.4
0$8
4,35
8.89
0.00
2,15
216
,105
0.33
25
CA
MB
ER
AM
LOD
IPIN
E B
ES
YLA
TE
10 M
G31
7220
239
$92,
665.
73$1
,892
.25
$94,
557.
980.
003,
281
17,3
340.
3621
MY
LAN
ME
TO
PR
OLO
L T
AR
TR
AT
E50
MG
0037
8003
2$7
3,86
5.82
$1,8
23.2
4$7
5,68
9.06
0.00
3,33
413
,596
0.28
40
CA
MB
ER
AM
LOD
IPIN
E B
ES
YLA
TE
5 M
G31
7220
238
$135
,416
.03
$1,4
85.4
9$1
36,9
01.5
20.
003,
620
25,6
230.
535
MY
LAN
ME
TO
PR
OLO
L T
AR
TR
AT
E25
MG
0037
8001
8$1
67,2
07.1
6$1
,396
.01
$168
,603
.17
0.00
3,70
433
,996
0.70
2
CA
RA
CO
ME
TO
PR
OLO
L T
AR
TR
AT
E25
MG
5766
4050
6$9
0,10
0.13
$1,2
48.7
4$9
1,34
8.87
0.00
3,88
819
,104
0.39
16
TE
VA
ME
TO
PR
OLO
L T
AR
TR
AT
E50
MG
0009
3073
3$6
7,07
3.13
$783
.23
$67,
856.
360.
004,
532
12,1
850.
2546
LUP
INLI
SIN
OP
RIL
40 M
G68
1800
517
$73,
401.
11$4
53.3
8$7
3,85
4.49
0.00
5,34
211
,694
0.24
50
LUP
INLI
SIN
OP
RIL
20 M
G68
1800
515
$95,
936.
83$2
63.7
8$9
6,20
0.61
0.00
6,08
418
,386
0.38
18
LUP
INLI
SIN
OP
RIL
5 M
G68
1800
513
$49,
704.
19$2
55.3
9$4
9,95
9.58
0.00
6,12
312
,613
0.26
44
SA
ND
OZ
FU
RO
SE
MID
E40
MG
0078
1196
6$7
9,83
4.24
$242
.18
$80,
076.
420.
006,
191
23,6
200.
498
SA
ND
OZ
AT
EN
OLO
L50
MG
0078
1150
6$5
8,39
2.06
$180
.38
$58,
572.
440.
006,
572
11,9
760.
2547
MY
LAN
FU
RO
SE
MID
E40
MG
0037
8021
6$4
9,08
0.58
$149
.79
$49,
230.
370.
006,
796
14,0
680.
2936
LUP
INLI
SIN
OP
RIL
10 M
G68
1800
514
$80,
749.
80$1
28.3
7$8
0,87
8.17
0.00
6,96
917
,725
0.37
20
QU
ALI
TE
ST
FU
RO
SE
MID
E20
MG
0060
3373
9$4
6,90
2.62
$121
.34
$47,
023.
960.
007,
024
14,1
770.
2934
QU
ALI
TE
ST
FU
RO
SE
MID
E40
MG
0060
3374
0$4
7,04
6.90
$114
.27
$47,
161.
170.
007,
085
12,9
390.
2743
SA
ND
OZ
FU
RO
SE
MID
E20
MG
0078
1181
8$5
0,48
0.40
$94.
27$5
0,57
4.67
0.00
7,26
116
,943
0.35
22
MY
LAN
FU
RO
SE
MID
E20
MG
0037
8020
8$4
4,92
9.44
$86.
11$4
5,01
5.55
0.00
7,32
814
,065
0.29
37
TO
TA
L$1
30,4
82,5
71.9
9$4
8,67
4,36
4.03
$179
,156
,936
.02
40.5
31,
115,
437
23.0
0
88 P
RO
DU
CT
S
TO
TA
L$2
97,0
70,6
81.8
3$1
20,0
91,5
03.6
8$4
17,1
62,1
85.5
110
0.00
4,84
9,68
210
0.00
ALL
PR
OD
UC
TS
NO
TE
: D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
OR
IGIN
AL,
PA
ID P
AC
EN
ET
CLA
IMS
BY
DA
TE
OF
PA
YM
EN
T.
TO
TA
L C
LAIM
S IN
CLU
DE
DE
DU
CT
IBLE
CLA
IMS
AN
D C
OP
AID
CLA
IMS
.S
OU
RC
E:
PD
A C
LAIM
S H
IST
OR
Y
43
PA
GE
1
AS
SO
CIA
TE
D N
DC
RA
NK
BY
% O
F A
LL
% O
F A
LL
MA
NU
FA
CT
UR
ER
LA
BE
LE
R C
OD
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
CL
AIM
SC
LA
IMS
BO
EH
RIN
GE
R IN
GE
LHE
IM00
054,
005
971
$13,
276,
407.
676.
7%21
6,11
02.
7%
NO
VA
RT
IS00
065,
000
67, 0
0078
, 001
68, 0
0185
, 00
281,
004
62, 0
0781
, 009
98, 6
1314
, 62
577,
638
51, 6
6521
, 666
85, 6
6758
2$1
1,57
9,73
0.66
5.8%
710,
073
8.8%
ME
RC
K00
006,
000
85, 4
1100
, 665
823
$11,
378,
191.
725.
7%12
7,70
11.
6%
AS
TR
A Z
EN
EC
A00
186,
003
104
$10,
960,
536.
665.
5%14
3,74
81.
8%
TE
VA
0009
3, 0
0172
, 005
55, 0
0703
, 501
11,
5128
5, 5
7844
, 593
10, 6
3459
, 685
465
$10,
839,
962.
395.
4%74
0,01
59.
2%
AC
TA
VIS
0022
8, 0
0258
, 004
56, 0
0472
, 005
36,
0059
1, 1
4550
, 162
52, 4
5963
, 525
44,
6203
7, 6
7767
6$9
,751
,030
.11
4.9%
402,
479
5.0%
GLA
XO
SM
ITH
KLI
NE
0000
7, 0
0029
, 001
45, 0
0173
, 195
15,
4940
1, 4
9702
7$9
,743
,967
.99
4.9%
127,
914
1.6%
SA
NO
FI
0002
4, 0
0039
, 000
66, 0
0068
, 000
75,
0008
8, 0
0955
8$8
,223
,654
.27
4.1%
66,3
490.
8%
PF
IZE
R00
005,
000
08, 0
0009
, 000
13, 0
0025
, 00
046,
000
49, 0
0069
, 000
71, 0
0206
, 00
641,
597
62, 6
0793
, 615
70, 6
2856
, 74
300
9$8
,166
,785
.74
4.1%
193,
898
2.4%
NO
VO
NO
RD
ISK
0016
910
$7,9
51,9
74.3
24.
0%69
,837
0.9%
MY
LAN
0037
8, 4
2292
, 495
02, 5
1079
11$7
,392
,516
.58
3.7%
809,
347
10.0
%
JOH
NS
ON
& J
OH
NS
ON
0006
2, 1
0147
, 504
58, 5
7894
, 596
76,
6866
912
$6,6
40,8
38.8
43.
3%44
,159
0.5%
ELI
LIL
LY00
002,
007
7713
$5,9
26,8
35.1
73.
0%34
,187
0.4%
TA
BL
E 3
.3P
AC
E A
ND
PA
CE
NE
T N
UM
BE
R A
ND
PE
RC
EN
T O
F E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
AN
D C
LA
IMS
BY
MA
NU
FA
CT
UR
ER
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
44
PA
GE
2
AS
SO
CIA
TE
D N
DC
RA
NK
BY
% O
F A
LL
% O
F A
LL
MA
NU
FA
CT
UR
ER
LA
BE
LE
R C
OD
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
CL
AIM
SC
LA
IMS
TA
BL
E 3
.3P
AC
E A
ND
PA
CE
NE
T N
UM
BE
R A
ND
PE
RC
EN
T O
F E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
AN
D C
LA
IMS
BY
MA
NU
FA
CT
UR
ER
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
AP
OT
EX
6050
514
$4,3
99,5
64.9
12.
2%31
9,24
03.
9%
ALL
ER
GA
N00
023,
119
80, 6
0758
15$3
,565
,241
.19
1.8%
66,0
630.
8%
AS
TE
LLA
S00
469,
512
4816
$3,5
40,8
46.0
91.
8%32
,932
0.4%
BR
IST
OL-
MY
ER
S S
QU
IBB
0000
3, 0
0056
, 000
87, 6
3653
17$3
,506
,723
.46
1.8%
32,9
460.
4%
VA
LEA
NT
0018
7, 0
0884
, 085
69, 1
3548
, 242
08,
2501
0, 4
2702
, 644
55, 6
6490
, 686
82,
6878
2, 9
9207
18$3
,450
,871
.50
1.7%
63,6
400.
8%
GIL
EA
D S
CIE
NC
ES
1558
4, 6
1958
19$3
,329
,029
.54
1.7%
10,8
690.
1%
AM
GE
N55
513,
584
0620
$3,1
54,8
03.3
91.
6%5,
999
0.1%
DA
IICH
I SA
NK
YO
6339
5, 6
5597
21$3
,033
,361
.12
1.5%
46,5
560.
6%
AU
RO
BIN
DO
1310
7, 6
5862
22$2
,579
,006
.90
1.3%
281,
198
3.5%
TA
KE
DA
6476
423
$2,5
31,9
89.8
01.
3%28
,616
0.4%
EN
DO
/QU
ALI
TE
ST
0060
3, 6
0951
, 634
81, 6
7253
, 679
79,
6877
424
$2,2
74,0
05.1
01.
1%38
0,66
54.
7%
TO
RR
EN
T13
668,
243
38, 6
4406
, 668
69, 6
7857
, 68
152
25$2
,146
,464
.67
1.1%
121,
947
1.5%
TO
TA
L, T
OP
25
MA
NU
FA
CT
UR
ER
S$1
59,3
44,3
39.7
979
.8%
5,07
6,48
862
.8%
TO
TA
L, A
LL O
TH
ER
MA
NU
FA
CT
UR
ER
S$4
0,26
5,60
0.20
20.2
%3,
009,
348
37.2
%
TO
TA
L, A
LL M
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
RS
$199
,609
,939
.99
100.
0%8,
085,
836
100.
0%
M
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
R D
AT
A A
RE
SU
MM
AR
IZE
D B
Y T
HE
FIR
ST
FIV
E D
IGIT
S O
F T
HE
11-
DIG
IT N
AT
ION
AL
DR
UG
CO
DE
, i.e
., LA
BE
LER
CO
DE
.
SO
UR
CE
: PD
A C
LAIM
S H
IST
OR
YN
OT
ES
: D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
OR
IGIN
AL,
PA
ID C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F P
AY
ME
NT
.
45
91
-92
TH
RO
UG
H0
5-0
60
6-0
70
7-0
80
8-0
90
9-1
01
0-1
11
1-1
21
2-1
31
3-1
41
4-1
51
5-1
6 Y
TD
RE
CE
IPT
SR
EC
EIP
TS
RE
CE
IPT
SR
EC
EIP
TS
RE
CE
IPT
SR
EC
EIP
TS
RE
CE
IPT
SR
EC
EIP
TS
RE
CE
IPT
SR
EC
EIP
TS
RE
CE
IPT
ST
OT
AL
JAN
-DE
C
19
91
$2
2,7
50
,78
2$
0$
20
,84
6$
0$
0$
2,0
49
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$2
2,7
73
,67
6
JAN
-DE
C
19
92
$3
0,1
24
,57
9$
0$
19
,21
1$
0$
0$
3,3
95
$3
$0
$0
$1
5,4
38
$0
$3
0,1
62
,62
5
JAN
-DE
C
19
93
$3
2,0
04
,50
4$
0$
12
,63
4$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
16
,84
6$
0$
32
,03
3,9
84
JAN
-DE
C
19
94
$3
0,6
66
,16
3$
24
8$
0$
0$
0$
0$
2$
0$
0$
0$
0$
30
,66
6,4
13
JAN
-DE
C
19
95
$3
2,6
42
,77
8$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
60
,16
2$
0$
0$
20
7$
32
,70
3,1
47
JAN
-DE
C
19
96
$3
1,1
76
,96
3$
0$
2,2
85
$0
$0
$0
$0
$4
,60
2$
33
2$
0$
0$
31
,18
4,1
81
JAN
-DE
C
19
97
$3
8,7
88
,00
9$
0$
12
,68
6$
0$
3,2
03
$2
,39
7$
0$
4,8
35
($6
72
)$
0$
29
8$
38
,81
0,7
56
JAN
-DE
C
19
98
$4
8,8
63
,42
1$
0$
12
,15
8$
0$
15
7$
1,1
17
$0
($7
24
)($
25
,71
9)
$0
$7
49
$4
8,8
51
,15
9
JAN
-DE
C1
99
9$
52
,50
7,4
27
$0
$1
,28
0$
8,2
03
$2
6,0
70
$0
$0
$1
4,9
48
$2
1,1
33
$0
$1
,64
6$
52
,58
0,7
06
JAN
-DE
C2
00
0$
58
,80
1,4
46
$0
$1
86
,71
8$
0$
0$
0$
0$
15
,86
0$
13
,35
1$
0$
71
4$
59
,01
8,0
89
JAN
-DE
C2
00
1$
58
,24
3,2
33
$1
8$
0$
0$
0($
27
7)
($2
37
)$
4,0
89
$9
,93
4$
0$
13
8$
58
,25
6,8
99
JAN
-DE
C2
00
2$
75
,82
9,8
25
$3
,11
5$
4,0
75
$1
,07
0($
61
9,5
15
)($
21
,59
3)
$0
$6
7,1
26
$2
36
,96
1$
2$
19
2$
75
,50
1,2
58
JAN
-DE
C2
00
3$
10
3,5
99
,68
4($
2,7
33
,93
6)
$2
,14
0$
67
,45
2$
79
9,3
65
$9
0,4
80
($1
7,4
38
)$
11
0,1
26
$6
0,3
52
$0
$2
10
$1
01
,97
8,4
35
JAN
-DE
C2
00
4$
12
2,0
66
,59
3$
1,6
51
,88
4$
17
1,0
80
$5
7,4
07
$2
48
,19
5($
31
9,3
31
)$
13
,49
0$
21
9,1
04
$2
87
,75
3$
2,8
63
$3
,69
4$
12
4,4
02
,73
1
JAN
-DE
C2
00
5$
13
2,2
85
,89
3$
1,4
71
,06
1($
1,0
52
,55
9)
$6
2,5
06
$2
47
,83
5($
37
,83
2)
$4
,15
4$
10
4,2
07
$8
4,2
08
$1
,86
0$
17
,77
6$
13
3,1
89
,11
0
JAN
-DE
C2
00
6$
25
,42
0,4
00
$9
1,4
26
,99
0$
1,6
48
,39
2$
29
9,6
90
$4
66
,61
8($
10
4,6
19
)$
4,1
05
$2
05
,03
6$
8,1
33
$3
,63
7$
37
,76
3$
11
9,4
16
,14
6
JAN
-DE
C2
00
7$
0$
6,5
79
,63
7$
63
,06
7,4
44
$3
62
,99
7$
3,1
92
,48
1$
54
2,4
78
$1
89
,77
1$
78
,23
5$
11
,23
3$
18
8,9
98
$1
48
,77
3$
74
,36
2,0
47
JAN
-DE
C2
00
8$
0$
0$
4,7
81
,67
9$
52
,19
9,6
96
$2
,56
1,1
90
($4
7,4
69
)$
57
9,5
16
($6
2,8
75
)$
27
4,7
59
$6
2,1
97
$6
2,1
88
$6
0,4
10
,88
1
JAN
-DE
C2
00
9$
0$
0$
0$
11
,78
2,4
55
$5
1,9
76
,63
3$
99
2,3
11
$7
28
,03
9$
1,6
22
,64
4$
13
7,7
99
$1
06
,00
8($
3,6
37
)$
67
,34
2,2
51
TA
BL
E 3
.4M
AN
UF
AC
TU
RE
RS
' RE
BA
TE
CA
SH
RE
CE
IPT
SB
Y Q
UA
RT
ER
/YE
AR
BIL
LE
D A
ND
BY
FIS
CA
L Y
EA
R R
EC
EIV
ED
JAN
UA
RY
199
1 -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
QU
AR
TE
R/Y
EA
RB
ILL
ED
JAN
-DE
C2
01
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
4,1
20
,82
3$
66
,37
2,4
60
$3
,63
9,4
21
$2
,02
0,1
92
($7
1,7
90
)$
95
,51
1$
5,0
73
$7
6,1
81
,69
0
JAN
-MA
R2
01
1$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
8,7
99
,45
4$
12
,18
3,6
50
$3
64
,39
7$
74
,79
3$
45
,78
6$
65
6$
21
,46
8,7
37
AP
R-J
UN
20
11
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9
,54
6,3
23
$4
66
,26
7$
37
,65
4$
25
6,2
91
($1
0,2
19
)$
10
,29
6,3
15
JUL
-SE
P2
01
1$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
8,2
69
,75
9$
24
3,4
09
$5
5,1
83
$2
97
,97
9$
6,5
91
$8
,87
2,9
21
OC
T-D
EC
20
11
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7
,77
6,3
20
$3
28
,50
4$
34
,28
0$
27
,99
4$
4,6
18
$8
,17
1,7
17
JAN
-MA
R2
01
2$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
3,6
28
,79
4$
8,8
37
,59
4$
79
,81
5$
24
6,8
66
($1
4,2
62
)$
12
,77
8,8
07
AP
R-J
UN
20
12
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8
,73
0,5
46
$4
2,1
53
$1
12
,62
1$
11
,61
4$
8,8
96
,93
4
JUL
-SE
P2
01
2$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
9,1
22
,95
5$
75
,01
6$
11
9,5
78
$4
1,6
85
$9
,35
9,2
34
OC
T-D
EC
20
12
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7
,95
6,1
54
$8
60
,57
0$
84
,80
5($
14
,85
6)
$8
,88
6,6
73
JAN
-MA
R2
01
3$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
11
,11
9,9
29
$1
42
,22
3$
33
,62
4$
11
,29
5,7
76
AP
R-J
UN
20
13
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7
,91
2,2
87
$5
7,0
74
($3
0,4
20
)$
7,9
38
,94
0
JUL
-SE
P2
01
3$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
8,4
22
,02
8$
11
8,2
50
$2
5,2
73
$8
,56
5,5
50
OC
T-D
EC
20
13
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8
,31
3,2
08
$5
40
,53
9$
16
7,1
05
$9
,02
0,8
52
JAN
-MA
R2
01
4$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
1,1
84
,06
3$
7,9
85
,72
3$
6,5
23
$9
,17
6,3
09
AP
R-J
UN
20
14
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$7
,87
6,4
75
$5
76
,64
4$
8,4
53
,11
9
JUL
-SE
P2
01
4$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
8,3
81
,09
4($
2,3
26
)$
8,3
78
,76
7
OC
T-D
EC
20
14
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$8
,44
8,0
01
$7
49
,64
9$
9,1
97
,65
0
JAN
-MA
R2
01
5$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
32
9,6
81
$8
,07
4,8
55
$8
,40
4,5
36
AP
R-J
UN
20
15
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9
,06
4,1
07
$9
,06
4,1
07
JUL
-SE
P2
01
5$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
0$
2,8
22
,69
0$
2,8
22
,69
0
OC
T-D
EC
20
15
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TO
TA
L$
89
5,7
71
,69
9$
98
,39
9,0
18
$6
8,8
90
,06
7$
64
,84
1,4
76
$6
3,0
23
,05
4$
76
,27
5,0
20
$4
6,5
45
,67
1$
40
,51
7,3
94
$3
9,2
58
,74
6$
35
,56
4,3
40
$2
1,7
89
,33
5$
1,4
50
,87
5,8
21
NO
TE
: IN
CL
UD
ES
RE
BA
TE
S R
EC
EIV
ED
TH
RO
UG
H D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015.
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
CH
EC
K R
EC
EIP
TS
AS
RE
PO
RT
ED
ON
ST
AT
E S
TA
TU
S R
EP
OR
T F
OR
WE
EK
EN
DIN
G D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
5, 2
015.
46
SECTION 4
CARDHOLDER UTILIZATION
DATA
47
48
PAGE 1
NEWLYQUARTER ENROLLED *
1st JUL-SEP 1984 273,001 100.0 273,001PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1984 23,561 7.9 296,562YEAR JAN-MAR 1985 20,941 6.6 317,503
APR-JUN 1985 69,436 17.9 386,939
2nd JUL-SEP 1985 38,750 10.0 389,177PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1985 20,522 5.0 409,699YEAR JAN-MAR 1986 18,770 4.4 428,469
APR-JUN 1986 17,367 3.9 445,836
3rd JUL-SEP 1986 23,595 5.6 420,776PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1986 14,982 3.4 435,758YEAR JAN-MAR 1987 18,130 4.0 453,888
APR-JUN 1987 18,853 4.0 472,741
4th JUL-SEP 1987 26,133 5.9 439,967PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1987 10,432 2.3 450,399YEAR JAN-MAR 1988 13,429 2.9 463,828
APR-JUN 1988 13,944 2.9 477,772
ENROLLMENT NEWLY AT END
QUARTER OF QUARTER**
5th JUL-SEP 1988 15,990 3.6 443,518PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1988 26,069 5.7 454,428YEAR JAN-MAR 1989 41,866 9.1 460,232
APR-JUN 1989 57,406 12.7 451,547
6th JUL-SEP 1989 9,847 2.2 438,834PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1989 17,787 4.2 426,822YEAR JAN-MAR 1990 30,278 7.1 424,120
APR-JUN 1990 40,169 9.8 408,493
7th JUL-SEP 1990 6,714 1.7 394,821PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1990 26,742 6.9 384,854YEAR JAN-MAR 1991 37,239 9.7 383,792
APR-JUN 1991 46,020 12.4 371,592
8th JUL-SEP 1991 8,657 2.3 370,654PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1991 17,529 4.7 373,365YEAR JAN-MAR 1992 31,581 8.4 375,697
APR-JUN 1992 44,986 12.2 369,919
9th JUL-SEP 1992 7,115 2.0 355,319PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1992 13,436 3.9 347,371YEAR JAN-MAR 1993 29,556 8.4 353,309
APR-JUN 1993 41,397 12.1 341,361
10th JUL-SEP 1993 6,658 2.0 334,757PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1993 11,519 3.5 331,338YEAR JAN-MAR 1994 20,162 6.2 324,160
APR-JUN 1994 33,967 10.4 325,090
11th JUL-SEP 1994 7,091 2.3 312,413PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1994 11,167 3.6 307,231YEAR JAN-MAR 1995 22,732 7.3 311,450
APR-JUN 1995 31,995 10.5 304,153
12th JUL-SEP 1995 5,382 1.8 298,732PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1995 8,278 2.9 289,919YEAR JAN-MAR 1996 16,146 5.6 290,460
APR-JUN 1996 22,518 8.1 279,397
NEWLYENROLLED ENROLLED
ENROLLED ENROLLMENTS
PACE
JULY 1988 - JUNE 1996CUMULATIVE % OF
TABLE 4.1PACE AND PACENET CARDHOLDER ENROLLMENTS BY QUARTER
PACE
JULY 1984 - JUNE 1988% OF NEWLY CUMULATIVE
49
PAGE 2
ENROLLMENT CUMULATIVE % OF ENROLLMENT NEWLY AT END NEWLY NEWLY AT END
QUARTER OF QUARTER** ENROLLED ENROLLED OF QUARTER
13th JUL-SEP 1996 4,127 1.5 267,049
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1996 9,332 3.6 260,678 1,523 100.0 1,523
YEAR JAN-MAR 1997 23,797 8.6 275,607 5,771 100.0 5,771
APR-JUN 1997 30,602 11.6 264,414 9,088 100.0 9,088
14th JUL-SEP 1997 4,536 1.8 257,291 1,949 17.7 11,037
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1997 8,694 3.5 250,671 3,801 29.5 12,889
YEAR JAN-MAR 1998 16,693 6.6 251,915 5,710 48.5 11,771
APR-JUN 1998 22,838 9.3 245,553 7,419 53.8 13,802
15th JUL-SEP 1998 4,375 1.8 237,753 879 5.8 15,213
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1998 8,042 3.5 230,722 1,504 9.4 15,964
YEAR JAN-MAR 1999 14,744 6.4 231,049 3,216 19.9 16,164
APR-JUN 1999 20,672 9.1 227,041 4,722 27.2 17,372
16th JUL-SEP 1999 4,086 1.8 221,535 761 4.2 18,195
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 1999 7,981 3.7 217,103 1,510 8.1 18,655
YEAR JAN-MAR 2000 18,146 8.2 220,896 4,169 21.6 19,298
APR-JUN 2000 25,583 11.8 217,140 6,125 30.1 20,375
17th JUL-SEP 2000 5,061 2.4 213,041 1,032 4.9 21,223
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2000 10,283 4.9 208,227 2,034 9.3 21,781
YEAR JAN-MAR 2001 19,041 9.1 208,299 4,610 20.8 22,167
APR-JUN 2001 24,932 12.0 207,193 6,603 28.9 22,875
18th JUL-SEP 2001 3,877 1.9 204,839 1,710 6.9 24,929
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2001 7,907 4.0 199,898 3,132 12.1 25,873
YEAR JAN-MAR 2002 16,319 8.2 199,719 6,931 23.3 29,692
APR-JUN 2002 22,742 11.4 198,629 9,938 32.7 30,346
19th JUL-SEP 2002 3,490 1.8 191,935 1,378 4.6 29,980
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2002 6,925 3.7 188,566 2,476 8.2 30,356
YEAR JAN-MAR 2003 13,384 7.0 190,697 5,516 17.5 31,464
APR-JUN 2003 21,287 10.9 194,961 9,654 29.7 32,520
20th JUL-SEP 2003 4,467 2.4 187,914 2,299 6.8 33,855
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2003 8,106 4.4 185,143 3,737 10.9 34,314
YEAR JAN-MAR 2004 21,568 10.8 200,130 37,246 51.4 72,474
APR-JUN 2004 28,312 14.3 197,600 43,224 49.7 87,007
21st JUL-SEP 2004 4,222 2.2 194,488 7,598 8.1 94,002
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2004 6,717 3.5 191,669 15,186 15.3 99,572
YEAR JAN-MAR 2005 13,536 7.0 193,946 25,934 28.2 92,035
APR-JUN 2005 19,467 10.2 190,273 35,063 34.2 102,622
22nd JUL-SEP 2005 3,935 2.1 187,696 6,301 5.9 107,240
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2005 9,001 4.8 188,495 15,579 13.3 116,755
YEAR JAN-MAR 2006 14,476 7.6 190,654 25,774 20.8 123,687
APR-JUN 2006 23,477 12.5 187,311 42,841 33.4 128,212
23rd JUL-SEP 2006 2,084 1.1 184,106 3,182 2.5 127,978
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2006 5,269 2.9 179,240 11,330 8.5 132,764
YEAR JAN-MAR 2007 8,687 4.8 182,332 19,571 14.6 134,018
APR-JUN 2007 11,621 6.5 178,746 26,974 19.7 136,805
24th JUL-SEP 2007 2,143 1.2 174,824 3,940 2.8 138,701
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2007 4,477 2.8 158,560 8,642 5.5 157,874
YEAR JAN-MAR 2008 6,956 4.5 155,547 19,078 11.9 160,227
APR-JUN 2008 9,712 6.3 155,026 29,033 17.2 169,043
ENROLLED ENROLLED NEWLY
CUMULATIVE % OF
PACE PACENET
JULY 1996 - DECEMBER 2015
TABLE 4.1 PACE AND PACENET CARDHOLDER ENROLLMENTS BY QUARTER
50
PAGE 3
ENROLLMENT CUMULATIVE % OF ENROLLMENT NEWLY AT END NEWLY NEWLY AT END
QUARTER OF QUARTER** ENROLLED ENROLLED OF QUARTER
25th JUL-SEP 2008 2,321 1.5 150,074 6,087 3.6 170,931
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2008 4,873 3.4 141,712 11,833 6.8 173,460
YEAR JAN-MAR 2009 6,838 6.7 101,470 17,435 10.5 165,925
APR-JUN 2009 8,521 6.3 134,590 23,075 13.8 167,488
26th JUL-SEP 2009 1,848 1.4 133,248 6,469 3.8 170,994
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2009 2,654 2.0 131,002 13,898 8.2 169,270
YEAR JAN-MAR 2010 5,109 3.9 129,892 21,782 12.5 174,306
APR-JUN 2010 7,344 5.7 128,651 29,944 16.8 178,574
27th JUL-SEP 2010 1,203 1.0 126,424 4,636 2.6 178,869
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2010 2,800 2.3 121,369 9,292 5.2 177,774
YEAR JAN-MAR 2011 4,553 3.8 120,244 15,376 8.6 179,606
APR-JUN 2011 6,438 5.4 118,605 20,912 11.6 181,016
28th JUL-SEP 2011 1,349 1.2 117,121 3,376 1.9 180,624
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2011 3,291 2.9 112,850 7,820 4.4 176,771
YEAR JAN-MAR 2012 5,129 4.6 112,319 11,037 6.2 178,059
APR-JUN 2012 7,259 6.5 110,863 13,971 7.8 178,290
29th JUL-SEP 2012 1,382 1.3 110,133 2,571 1.4 177,702
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2012 3,200 2.9 109,395 5,196 3.0 175,524
YEAR JAN-MAR 2013 4,756 4.5 106,109 8,428 4.9 173,206
APR-JUN 2013 5,971 5.7 104,853 11,836 6.8 173,220
30th JUL-SEP 2013 966 0.9 102,787 2,555 1.5 170,876
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2013 2,273 2.2 101,375 6,018 3.5 173,456
YEAR JAN-MAR 2014 3,917 3.5 112,062 10,068 6.4 156,997 ***
APR-JUN 2014 5,651 5.1 110,606 13,673 8.7 157,043
31st JUL-SEP 2014 1,476 1.3 109,951 3,305 2.1 157,043
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2014 3,547 3.3 106,796 7,754 5.0 154,936
YEAR JAN-MAR 2015 5,286 5.0 105,769 11,599 7.5 155,082
APR-JUN 2015 6,680 6.4 104,325 15,074 9.7 154,768
32nd JUL-SEP 2015 1,059 1.0 102,361 2,762 1.8 153,897
PROGRAM OCT-DEC 2015 2,649 2.7 97,995 6,502 4.3 151,429
YEAR
* THE NEWLY ENROLLED NUMBER IS CALCULATED AS A TOTAL FOR THE QUARTER.
** ENROLLMENT AT END OF QUARTER REPRESENTS THE ENROLLMENT REPORTED ON THE LAST DAY OF THE QUARTER (I.E., 97,995 PACE CARDHOLDERS AND 151,429 PACENET CARDHOLDERS ON THE FILE ON DECEMBER 31, 2015).
*** MOVED 13,280 PACENET CARDHOLDERS TO PACE AND ADDED 3,327 NEW PACENET CARDHOLDERS.
SOURCE: PDA/MR-0-01A/CARDHOLDER FILE
ENROLLED ENROLLED NEWLY
CUMULATIVE % OF
PACE PACENET
JULY 1996 - DECEMBER 2015
TABLE 4.1 PACE AND PACENET CARDHOLDER ENROLLMENTS BY QUARTER
51
PA
GE
1
CLA
IMS
PE
RS
TA
TE
SH
AR
E P
ER
OF
ALL
TO
TA
LP
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
GS
TA
TE
SH
AR
EP
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
GS
TA
TE
SH
AR
EC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
TO
TA
L11
8,76
991
,271
3,22
7,12
510
0.0
35.4
$79,
602,
418
$872
.15
100.
0
SE
X FE
MA
LE91
,059
72,7
302,
634,
927
81.6
36.2
$63,
495,
466
$873
.03
79.8
MA
LE27
,710
18,5
4159
2,19
818
.431
.9$1
6,10
6,95
3$8
68.7
220
.2
AG
E 65-6
9 Y
EA
RS
16,7
2410
,954
292,
289
9.1
26.7
$8,5
61,0
71$7
81.5
510
.8
70-7
4 Y
EA
RS
19,9
9014
,835
482,
696
15.0
32.5
$12,
669,
534
$854
.03
15.9
75-7
9 Y
EA
RS
22,6
1717
,644
632,
969
19.6
35.9
$16,
404,
038
$929
.72
20.6
80-8
4 Y
EA
RS
22,8
3618
,420
703,
410
21.8
38.2
$17,
564,
174
$953
.54
22.1
85 Y
EA
RS
OR
OV
ER
36,6
0229
,418
1,11
5,76
134
.637
.9$2
4,40
3,60
1$8
29.5
530
.7
RE
SID
EN
CE
TY
PE
OW
N62
,243
48,2
481,
648,
667
51.1
34.2
$43,
664,
878
$905
.01
54.9
RE
NT
34,7
2925
,736
898,
082
27.8
34.9
$20,
094,
913
$780
.81
25.2
NU
RS
ING
HO
ME
/3,
242
2,57
015
1,15
94.
758
.8$2
,873
,009
$1,1
17.9
03.
6 P
ER
SO
NA
L C
AR
E H
OM
E
LIV
E W
ITH
RE
LAT
IVE
10,8
038,
522
310,
163
9.6
36.4
$7,9
44,2
32$9
32.2
010
.0
OT
HE
R6,
959
5,62
620
0,26
06.
235
.6$4
,500
,204
$799
.89
5.7
MIS
SIN
G79
356
918
,794
0.6
33.0
$525
,182
$922
.99
0.7
MA
RIT
AL
ST
AT
US
SIN
GLE
OR
WID
OW
ED
88,3
5468
,938
2,50
1,67
777
.536
.3$5
9,73
7,18
7$8
66.5
375
.0
MA
RR
IED
10,6
567,
662
238,
488
7.4
31.1
$6,3
24,5
69$8
25.4
57.
9
DIV
OR
CE
D16
,012
11,9
7739
1,69
112
.132
.7$1
0,69
4,42
5$8
92.9
113
.4
MA
RR
IED
, LIV
ING
3,74
72,
694
95,2
693.
035
.4$2
,846
,238
$1,0
56.5
13.
6 S
EP
AR
AT
ELY
PE
RC
EN
TO
F T
OT
AL
CLA
IMS
PE
RC
EN
T
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
TA
BL
E 4
.2A
PA
CE
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
EN
RO
LL
ME
NT
, PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ION
, UT
ILIZ
AT
ION
, AN
D E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
BY
DE
MO
GR
AP
HIC
CH
AR
AC
TE
RIS
TIC
SJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
EN
RO
LLE
DT
OT
AL
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
TO
TA
L
52
PA
GE
2
CLA
IMS
PE
RS
TA
TE
SH
AR
E P
ER
OF
ALL
TO
TA
LP
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
GS
TA
TE
SH
AR
EP
AR
TIC
IPA
TIN
GS
TA
TE
SH
AR
EC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
PE
RC
EN
TO
F T
OT
AL
CLA
IMS
PE
RC
EN
T
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
TA
BL
E 4
.2A
PA
CE
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
EN
RO
LL
ME
NT
, PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ION
, UT
ILIZ
AT
ION
, AN
D E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
BY
DE
MO
GR
AP
HIC
CH
AR
AC
TE
RIS
TIC
SJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
EN
RO
LLE
DT
OT
AL
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
TO
TA
L
ET
HN
IC O
RIG
IN
WH
ITE
94,3
6775
,571
2,80
0,40
486
.837
.1$6
7,80
1,03
8$8
97.1
885
.2
AF
RIC
AN
-AM
ER
ICA
N10
,265
6,95
019
2,27
66.
027
.7$5
,071
,014
$729
.64
6.4
AM
ER
ICA
N IN
DIA
N14
696
3,08
70.
132
.2$8
5,47
4$8
90.3
60.
1
HIS
PA
NIC
2,38
01,
469
41,6
741.
328
.4$9
59,3
22$6
53.0
41.
2
AS
IAN
1,23
074
916
,558
0.5
22.1
$838
,915
$1,1
20.0
51.
1
OT
HE
R66
843
812
,666
0.4
28.9
$324
,862
$741
.69
0.4
MIS
SIN
G9,
713
5,99
816
0,46
05.
026
.8$4
,521
,793
$753
.88
5.7
INC
OM
E -
SIN
GLE
$0-$
2,99
94,
297
1,80
763
,411
2.0
35.1
$1,7
83,9
51$9
87.2
42.
2
$3,0
00-$
5,99
94,
549
3,38
012
0,05
13.
735
.5$2
,874
,575
$850
.47
3.6
$6,0
00-$
8,99
911
,698
9,00
330
2,79
39.
433
.6$8
,922
,372
$991
.04
11.2
$9,0
00-$
11,9
9925
,691
20,2
0570
7,41
121
.935
.0$1
8,36
5,99
6$9
08.9
823
.1
$12,
000-
$14,
500
48,1
5338
,384
1,39
5,44
743
.236
.4$3
1,94
9,99
8$8
32.3
840
.1
$14,
500
+13
,725
10,8
3039
9,52
412
.436
.9$9
,380
,958
$866
.20
11.8
INC
OM
E -
MA
RR
IED
$0-$
2,99
950
220
35,
527
0.2
27.2
$307
,465
$1,5
14.6
10.
4
$3,0
00-$
5,99
914
884
2,83
40.
133
.7$1
41,7
39$1
,687
.36
0.2
$6,0
00-$
8,99
943
329
19,
890
0.3
34.0
$328
,127
$1,1
27.5
80.
4
$9,0
00-$
11,9
9975
654
315
,839
0.5
29.2
$433
,618
$798
.56
0.5
$12,
000-
$14,
999
1,84
81,
402
45,4
891.
432
.4$1
,401
,379
$999
.56
1.8
$15,
000-
$17,
700
4,44
03,
370
111,
118
3.4
33.0
$2,7
45,1
41$8
14.5
83.
4
$17,
700
+2,
529
1,76
947
,791
1.5
27.0
$967
,100
$546
.69
1.2
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
, CA
RD
HO
LDE
R F
ILE
NO
TE
: DA
TA
INC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
CLA
IMS
BY
DA
TE
OF
SE
RV
ICE
, EX
CLU
DE
PA
CE
NE
T C
LAIM
S.
TH
E H
IGH
ES
T IN
CO
ME
CA
TE
GO
RY
INC
LUD
ES
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
WH
O H
AV
E R
EM
AIN
ED
IN T
HE
PR
OG
RA
M E
VE
N T
HO
UG
H T
HE
IR IN
CO
ME
S E
XC
EE
D IN
CO
ME
E
LIG
IBIL
ITY
LIM
ITS
DU
E T
O N
OM
INA
L IN
CR
EA
SE
S IN
TH
EIR
SO
CIA
L S
EC
UR
ITY
INC
OM
E.
TH
IS IN
CO
ME
GR
OU
P M
AY
ALS
O IN
CLU
DE
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
WH
O E
XC
EE
D
TH
E IN
CO
ME
LIM
ITS
AN
D L
OS
E E
LIG
IBIL
ITY
DU
RIN
G T
HE
YE
AR
.
53
PA
GE
1
TO
TA
LS
TA
TE
% O
FC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SH
AR
ET
OT
AL
TO
TA
LT
OT
AL
AN
D T
PL
EX
PE
ND
I-C
LAIM
SC
LAIM
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
ST
UR
ES
TO
TA
L17
6,43
813
9,89
84,
853,
788
100.
034
.7$4
18,4
80,3
87$2
97,8
51,3
0871
.2$1
20,6
29,0
7928
.8$8
62.2
610
0.0
SE
X FE
MA
LE11
6,94
796
,134
3,41
5,03
770
.435
.5$2
86,2
80,2
50$2
05,0
49,2
2871
.6$8
1,23
1,02
128
.4$8
44.9
867
.3M
ALE
59,4
9143
,764
1,43
8,75
129
.632
.9$1
32,2
00,1
38$9
2,80
2,07
970
.2$3
9,39
8,05
829
.8$9
00.2
432
.7
AG
E 65-6
9 Y
EA
RS
26,8
3519
,239
546,
220
11.3
28.4
$58,
636,
585
$42,
740,
068
72.9
$15,
896,
518
27.1
$826
.27
13.2
70-7
4 Y
EA
RS
33,9
1626
,616
893,
526
18.4
33.6
$89,
218,
900
$64,
692,
395
72.5
$24,
526,
505
27.5
$921
.49
20.3
75-7
9 Y
EA
RS
36,6
1229
,699
1,05
2,08
221
.735
.4$9
5,92
0,46
1$6
8,27
5,97
471
.2$2
7,64
4,48
728
.8$9
30.8
222
.980
-84
YE
AR
S34
,988
28,6
311,
040,
998
21.4
36.4
$85,
565,
723
$60,
057,
936
70.2
$25,
507,
787
29.8
$890
.91
21.1
85 Y
EA
RS
OR
OV
ER
44,0
8735
,713
1,32
0,96
227
.237
.0$8
9,13
8,71
8$6
2,08
4,93
569
.6$2
7,05
3,78
330
.4$7
57.5
322
.4
RE
SID
EN
CE
TY
PE
OW
N11
6,97
991
,898
3,03
5,12
762
.533
.0$2
65,2
98,3
68$1
87,6
09,8
6070
.7$7
7,68
8,50
729
.3$8
45.3
864
.4R
EN
T38
,842
30,7
821,
096,
351
22.6
35.6
$94,
663,
540
$68,
565,
173
72.4
$26,
098,
367
27.6
$847
.85
21.6
NU
RS
ING
HO
ME
/4,
143
3,53
721
1,43
24.
459
.8$1
2,80
9,30
8$9
,071
,788
70.8
$3,7
37,5
2029
.2$1
,056
.69
3.1
P
ER
S. C
AR
E H
OM
ELI
VE
WIT
H R
ELA
TIV
E9,
852
8,32
731
5,86
76.
537
.9$2
8,98
6,97
7$2
0,41
3,88
270
.4$8
,573
,095
29.6
$1,0
29.5
57.
1O
TH
ER
5,72
94,
705
172,
135
3.5
36.6
$14,
572,
187
$10,
569,
890
72.5
$4,0
02,2
9727
.5$8
50.6
53.
3M
ISS
ING
893
649
22,8
760.
535
.2$2
,150
,007
$1,6
20,7
1475
.4$5
29,2
9324
.6$8
15.5
50.
4
MA
RIT
AL
ST
AT
US
SIN
GLE
OR
WID
OW
ED
95,8
3677
,263
2,77
3,12
857
.135
.9$2
28,8
13,0
22$1
62,2
69,1
1470
.9$6
6,54
3,90
829
.1$8
61.2
655
.2M
AR
RIE
D62
,218
48,3
171,
597,
399
32.9
33.1
$143
,525
,327
$102
,184
,937
71.2
$41,
340,
390
28.8
$855
.61
34.3
DIV
OR
CE
D15
,455
12,0
4440
2,27
98.
333
.4$3
9,49
6,60
9$2
8,59
1,48
772
.4$1
0,90
5,12
127
.6$9
05.4
49.
0M
AR
RIE
D, L
IVIN
G2,
929
2,27
480
,982
1.7
35.6
$6,6
45,4
29$4
,805
,769
72.3
$1,8
39,6
6027
.7$8
09.0
01.
5 S
EP
AR
AT
ELY
ET
HN
IC O
RIG
INW
HIT
E14
3,39
011
6,67
94,
224,
725
87.0
36.2
$359
,872
,616
$255
,875
,646
71.1
$103
,996
,969
28.9
$891
.31
86.2
AF
RIC
AN
-AM
ER
ICA
N10
,274
7,56
121
1,11
64.
327
.9$2
0,47
5,18
0$1
4,47
0,36
370
.7$6
,004
,817
29.3
$794
.18
5.0
AM
ER
ICA
N IN
DIA
N17
112
34,
013
0.1
32.6
$358
,701
$276
,233
77.0
$82,
468
23.0
$670
.47
0.1
HIS
PA
NIC
2,17
81,
623
47,9
001.
029
.5$4
,558
,012
$3,3
83,4
3374
.2$1
,174
,579
25.8
$723
.71
1.0
AS
IAN
880
592
12,5
270.
321
.2$1
,777
,849
$1,2
45,1
9270
.0$5
32,6
5730
.0$8
99.7
60.
4O
TH
ER
933
695
21,9
470.
531
.6$1
,745
,563
$1,2
08,3
0669
.2$5
37,2
5830
.8$7
73.0
30.
4M
ISS
ING
18,6
1212
,625
331,
560
6.8
26.3
$29,
692,
467
$21,
392,
136
72.0
$8,3
00,3
3128
.0$6
57.4
56.
9
AN
D T
PL
TU
RE
S
CLA
IMS
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
EN
RO
LLE
DT
OT
AL
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
TO
TA
L
CA
RD
HO
LDE
R
ST
AT
ES
HA
RE
EX
PE
ND
I -T
UR
ES
PA
TIN
G
SH
AR
E P
ER
PA
RT
ICI-
EX
PE
ND
I-
TA
BL
E 4
.2B
PA
CE
NE
T C
AR
DH
OL
DE
R E
NR
OL
LM
EN
T, P
AR
TIC
IPA
TIO
N, U
TIL
IZA
TIO
N, A
ND
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
BY
DE
MO
GR
AP
HIC
CH
AR
AC
TE
RIS
TIC
S
% O
F
PE
R
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
TA
TE
SH
AR
E (
%)
EX
PE
ND
I-T
UR
ES
CIP
AN
T
OF
TO
TA
LP
AR
TI-
ST
AT
ES
HA
RE
(%
)O
F T
OT
AL
54
PA
GE
2
TO
TA
LS
TA
TE
% O
FC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SH
AR
ET
OT
AL
TO
TA
LT
OT
AL
AN
D T
PL
EX
PE
ND
I-C
LAIM
SC
LAIM
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
ST
UR
ES
AN
D T
PL
TU
RE
S
CLA
IMS
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
EN
RO
LLE
DT
OT
AL
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
TO
TA
L
CA
RD
HO
LDE
R
ST
AT
ES
HA
RE
EX
PE
ND
I -T
UR
ES
PA
TIN
G
SH
AR
E P
ER
PA
RT
ICI-
EX
PE
ND
I-
TA
BL
E 4
.2B
PA
CE
NE
T C
AR
DH
OL
DE
R E
NR
OL
LM
EN
T, P
AR
TIC
IPA
TIO
N, U
TIL
IZA
TIO
N, A
ND
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
BY
DE
MO
GR
AP
HIC
CH
AR
AC
TE
RIS
TIC
S
% O
F
PE
R
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
TA
TE
SH
AR
E (
%)
EX
PE
ND
I-T
UR
ES
CIP
AN
T
OF
TO
TA
LP
AR
TI-
ST
AT
ES
HA
RE
(%
)O
F T
OT
AL
INC
OM
E -
SIN
GLE
$14,
501
- $1
7,50
046
,145
37,1
001,
325,
669
27.3
35.7
$107
,482
,082
$77,
828,
562
72.4
$29,
653,
520
27.6
$799
.29
24.6
$17,
501
- $2
0,50
040
,274
32,4
391,
166,
992
24.0
36.0
$98,
719,
631
$69,
713,
904
70.6
$29,
005,
727
29.4
$894
.16
24.0
$20,
501
- $2
3,50
024
,153
19,3
6268
2,53
514
.135
.3$6
1,70
5,29
2$4
3,44
9,03
970
.4$1
8,25
6,25
429
.6$9
42.8
915
.1$2
3,50
0 +
3,64
82,
680
81,1
931.
730
.3$7
,048
,055
$4,6
74,8
6566
.3$2
,373
,189
33.7
$885
.52
2.0
INC
OM
E -
MA
RR
IED
$17,
701
- $2
2,50
016
,188
12,6
4142
7,57
88.
833
.8$3
4,82
3,75
7$2
5,92
8,21
874
.5$8
,895
,539
25.5
$703
.71
7.4
$22,
501
- $2
7,00
022
,540
17,6
8360
3,17
912
.434
.1$5
3,73
0,41
8$3
7,65
0,32
870
.1$1
6,08
0,09
129
.9$9
09.3
513
.3$2
7,00
1 -
$31,
500
20,5
6016
,049
521,
359
10.7
32.5
$49,
901,
977
$35,
381,
561
70.9
$14,
520,
415
29.1
$904
.76
12.0
$31,
500
+2,
930
1,94
445
,283
0.9
23.3
$5,0
69,1
75$3
,224
,830
63.6
$1,8
44,3
4536
.4$9
48.7
41.
5
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
, CA
RD
HO
LDE
R F
ILE
NO
TE
: D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
OR
IGIN
AL,
PA
ID P
AC
EN
ET
CLA
IMS
BY
DA
TE
OF
SE
RV
ICE
. T
OT
AL
CLA
IMS
INC
LUD
E D
ED
UC
TIB
LE C
LAIM
S A
ND
CO
PA
ID C
LAIM
S.
TH
E H
IGH
ES
T IN
CO
ME
CA
TE
GO
RY
INC
LUD
ES
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
WH
O H
AV
E R
EM
AIN
ED
IN T
HE
PR
OG
RA
M E
VE
N T
HO
UG
H T
HE
IR IN
CO
ME
S E
XC
EE
D IN
CO
ME
ELI
GIB
ILIT
Y L
IMIT
S D
UE
T
O N
OM
INA
L IN
CR
EA
SE
S IN
TH
EIR
SO
CIA
L S
EC
UR
ITY
INC
OM
E.
TH
IS IN
CO
ME
GR
OU
P M
AY
ALS
O IN
CLU
DE
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
WH
O E
XC
EE
D T
HE
INC
OM
E L
IMIT
S A
ND
LO
SE
ELI
GIB
ILIT
Y
DU
RIN
G T
HE
YE
AR
.
55
FIG
UR
E 4
.1A
PE
RC
EN
T O
F E
NR
OL
LE
D P
AC
E C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
BY
IN
CO
ME
AN
D M
AR
ITA
L S
TA
TU
SJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5(T
OT
AL
N =
118
,769
)
SIN
GL
EN
=10
8,11
3M
AR
RIE
DN
=10
,656
$0
-$2
,99
94
.7%
$3
,00
0-$
5,9
99
1.4
%
$6
,00
0-$
8,9
99
4.1
%$
9,0
00
-$1
1,9
99
7.1
%
*$1
7,7
00
+2
3.7
%
$0
-$2
,99
94
.0%
$3
,00
0-$
5,9
99
4.2
%$
6,0
00
-$8
,99
91
0.8
%
*$1
4,5
00
+1
2.7
%
in
the
ir S
oci
al S
ecu
rity
inco
me
. T
his
inco
me
gro
up
ma
y a
lso
incl
ud
e c
ard
ho
lde
rs w
ho
exc
ee
d th
e in
com
e li
mits
an
d lo
se e
ligib
ility
du
ring
the
ye
ar.
* T
he
hig
he
st in
com
e c
ate
go
ry in
clu
de
s ca
rdh
old
ers
wh
o h
ave
re
ma
ine
d in
the
pro
gra
m e
ven
tho
ug
h th
eir
inco
me
s e
xce
ed
inco
me
elig
ibili
ty li
mits
du
e to
no
min
al i
ncr
ea
ses
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
FIL
E
NO
TE
: D
ue
to r
ou
nd
ing
, ca
teg
ory
pe
rce
nta
ge
s m
ay
no
t ad
d u
p to
10
0%
.
$1
2,0
00
-$1
4,9
991
7.3
%
$1
5,0
00
-$1
7,7
004
1.7
%
$9
,00
0-$
11
,99
92
3.8
%$
12
,00
0-$
14
,500
44
.5%
56
FIG
UR
E 4
.1B
PE
RC
EN
T O
F E
NR
OL
LE
D P
AC
EN
ET
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
SB
Y I
NC
OM
E A
ND
MA
RIT
AL
ST
AT
US
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
(TO
TA
L N
=17
6,43
8)
SIN
GL
EN
=11
4,22
0M
AR
RIE
DN
=62
,218
$1
7,7
01
-$2
2,5
002
6.0
%$
27
,00
1-$
31
,500
33
.0%
*$3
1,5
00
+4
.7%
$1
4,5
01
-$1
7,5
004
0.4
%$
20
,50
1-$
23
,500
21
.1%
*$2
3,5
00
+3
.2%
NO
TE
: D
ue
to r
ou
nd
ing
, ca
teg
ory
pe
rce
nta
ge
s m
ay
no
t ad
d u
p to
10
0%
.
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
FIL
E
* T
he
hig
he
st in
com
e c
ate
go
ry in
clu
de
s ca
rdh
old
ers
wh
o h
ave
re
ma
ine
d in
the
pro
gra
m e
ven
tho
ug
h th
eir
inco
me
s e
xce
ed
inco
me
elig
ibili
ty li
mits
du
e to
no
min
al i
ncr
ea
ses
in
the
ir S
oci
al S
ecu
rity
inco
me
. T
his
inco
me
gro
up
ma
y a
lso
incl
ud
e c
ard
ho
lde
rs w
ho
exc
ee
d th
e in
com
e li
mits
an
d lo
se e
ligib
ility
du
ring
the
ye
ar.
$2
2,5
01
-$2
7,0
003
6.2
%
$1
7,5
01
-$2
0,5
003
5.3
%
57
TA
BL
E 4
.3O
TH
ER
PR
ES
CR
IPT
ION
INS
UR
AN
CE
CO
VE
RA
GE
OF
PA
CE
AN
D P
AC
EN
ET
EN
RO
LL
ED
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
SJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
PA
CE
PA
CE
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
A.
PA
CE
EN
RO
LLE
D C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SC
LAIM
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
CLA
IMS
PE
RT
OT
AL
ST
AT
EE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
TO
TA
LE
NR
OLL
ED
SH
AR
EP
ER
EN
RO
LLE
DN
UM
BE
R%
OF
TO
TA
LC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
114,
540
96.4
3,18
9,48
627
.8$7
6,92
9,92
2$6
71.6
4
ME
DIC
AR
E P
AR
T D
CO
VE
RA
GE
104,
170
87.7
2,83
7,21
727
.2$5
0,32
4,76
7$4
83.1
0
NO
N M
ED
ICA
RE
PA
RT
D C
OV
ER
AG
E10
,370
8.7
352,
269
34.0
$26,
605,
155
$2,5
65.5
9
NO
OT
HE
R K
NO
WN
PR
ES
CR
IPT
ION
CO
VE
RA
GE
4,22
93.
637
,639
8.9
$2,6
72,4
96$6
31.9
5
TO
TA
L P
AC
E E
NR
OLL
ED
118,
769
100.
03,
227,
125
27.2
$79,
602,
418
$670
.23
PA
CE
NE
TP
AC
EN
ET
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
B.
PA
CE
NE
TE
NR
OLL
ED
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RS
CLA
IMS
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SC
LAIM
S P
ER
TO
TA
L S
TA
TE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
ST
OT
AL
EN
RO
LLE
DS
HA
RE
PE
R E
NR
OLL
ED
NU
MB
ER
% O
F T
OT
AL
CLA
IMS
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
CA
RD
HO
LDE
R
168,
870
95.7
4,79
8,49
428
.4$1
16,4
88,7
22$6
89.8
1
ME
DIC
AR
E P
AR
T D
CO
VE
RA
GE
151,
655
86.0
4,37
4,03
628
.8$8
7,31
7,51
7$5
75.7
6
NO
N M
ED
ICA
RE
PA
RT
D C
OV
ER
AG
E17
,215
9.8
424,
458
24.7
$29,
171,
205
$1,6
94.5
2
NO
OT
HE
R K
NO
WN
PR
ES
CR
IPT
ION
CO
VE
RA
GE
7,56
84.
355
,294
7.3
$4,1
40,3
57$5
47.0
9
TO
TA
L P
AC
EN
ET
EN
RO
LLE
D17
6,43
810
0.0
4,85
3,78
827
.5$1
20,6
29,0
79$6
83.6
9
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CA
RD
HO
LDE
R F
ILE
, CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
NO
TE
S:
DA
TA
INC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
CLA
IMS
BY
DA
TE
OF
SE
RV
ICE
. S
OM
E C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S W
ER
E E
NR
OLL
ED
IN B
OT
H P
RO
GR
AM
S F
OR
SO
ME
PO
RT
ION
OF
TH
E Y
EA
R.
NO
T A
LL C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S W
ITH
IDE
NT
IFIE
D R
X IN
SU
RA
NC
E H
AD
AC
TIV
E T
HIR
D P
AR
TY
CO
VE
RA
GE
FO
R D
RU
GS
RE
IMB
UR
SE
D B
Y P
AC
E A
T T
HE
TIM
E O
F D
ISP
EN
SIN
G.
OT
HE
R P
RE
SC
RIP
TIO
N C
OV
ER
AG
E ID
EN
TIF
IED
OT
HE
R P
RE
SC
RIP
TIO
N C
OV
ER
AG
E ID
EN
TIF
IED
58
TABLE 4.4PART D CARDHOLDER ENROLLMENT, PARTICIPATION, AND EXPENDITURES
JANUARY - DECEMBER 2015
PAGE 1
PACE PACENET TOTAL
Part D, Auto-Enrolled 41,004 46,337 86,559Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled 63,166 105,318 165,474Not Enrolled in Part D 14,599 24,783 38,817Total PACE/PACENET Enrolled 118,769 176,438 290,850
Part D, Auto-Enrolled 35,127 41,751 76,223Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled 46,689 84,489 129,224Not Enrolled in Part D 9,455 13,658 22,809Total Participating Cardholders 91,271 139,898 228,256
Part D, Auto-Enrolled 1,348,170 1,664,882 3,013,052Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled 1,489,047 2,709,154 4,198,201Not Enrolled in Part D 389,908 479,752 869,660Total Claims 3,227,125 4,853,788 8,080,913
Part D, Auto-Enrolled 32.88 35.93 34.81Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled 23.57 25.72 25.37Not Enrolled in Part D 26.71 19.36 22.40All PACE/PACENET Enrolled 27.17 27.51 27.78
Part D, Auto-Enrolled $25,316,963 $31,083,254 $56,400,217Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled $25,007,805 $56,234,263 $81,242,068Not Enrolled in Part D $29,277,651 $33,311,562 $62,589,213All PACE/PACENET Enrolled $79,602,418 $120,629,079 $200,231,498
Part D, Auto-Enrolled $18.78 $18.67 $18.72Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled $16.79 $20.76 $19.35Not Enrolled in Part D $75.09 $69.43 $71.97All PACE/PACENET Enrolled $24.67 $24.85 $24.78
Part D, Auto-Enrolled $6,597,719 $16,584,486 $23,182,205Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled $7,323,245 $22,390,273 $29,713,518Not Enrolled in Part D $2,412,485 $6,040,547 $8,453,032All PACE/PACENET Enrolled $16,333,449 $45,015,306 $61,348,755
Part D, Auto-Enrolled $4.89 $9.96 $7.69Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled $4.92 $8.26 $7.08Not Enrolled in Part D $6.19 $12.59 $9.72All PACE/PACENET Enrolled $5.06 $9.27 $7.59
Part D, Auto-Enrolled $66,102,286 $82,621,731 $148,724,017Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled $83,361,180 $167,880,626 $251,241,806Not Enrolled in Part D $1,106,612 $2,333,646 $3,440,258All PACE/PACENET Enrolled $150,570,078 $252,836,003 $403,406,081
Total Cardholder Expenditures
Cardholder Share Per Claim
TPL Share
State Share Expenditures
State Share Per Claim
Enrolled Cardholders
Participating Cardholders
Claims
Claims Per Enrollee
59
TABLE 4.4PART D CARDHOLDER ENROLLMENT, PARTICIPATION, AND EXPENDITURES
JANUARY - DECEMBER 2015
PAGE 2
PACE PACENET TOTAL
Part D, Auto-Enrolled $49.03 $49.63 $49.36Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled $55.98 $61.97 $59.85Not Enrolled in Part D $2.84 $4.86 $3.96All PACE/PACENET Enrolled $46.66 $52.09 $49.92
Part D, Auto-Enrolled $98,016,968 $130,289,470 $228,306,438Part D, Not Auto-Enrolled $115,692,230 $246,505,162 $362,197,392Not Enrolled in Part D $32,796,748 $41,685,755 $74,482,503All PACE/PACENET Enrolled $246,505,946 $418,480,387 $664,986,334
Full LIS 17,674 3,762 21,337Partial LIS 2,656 2,730 5,336No LIS 20,674 39,845 59,886Total Auto-Enrolled Cardholders 41,004 46,337 86,559
Part D LIS Status Among Other Part D EnrolledFull LIS 30,682 9,972 40,056Partial LIS 4,233 7,421 11,380No LIS 28,251 87,925 114,038Total Other Part D Enrolled Cardholders 63,166 105,318 165,474
claim adjudication system. There may be additional prescription expenditures that were not submitted to PACE/PACENET.
Total Expenditures (State, Cardholder, TPL)
Part D LIS Status Among Auto-Enrolled
TPL Share Per Claim
Notes: Auto-enrolled cardholders include individuals who were enrolled or re-enrolled by PACE/PACENET into Part D partner plans within the two years prior to January 2015, and who had active coverage in a PACE/PACENET Part D partnerplan during 2015. The expenditure totals shown are based only on claims that were recorded in the PACE/PACENET
60
TO
TA
L D
RU
G S
PE
ND
CA
TE
GO
RY
PA
RT
D A
ND
LIS
ST
AT
US
TO
TA
L E
NR
OLL
ED
TO
TA
L C
LAIM
ST
OT
AL
DR
UG
SP
EN
DT
OT
AL
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
TO
TA
L C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S
HA
RE
TO
TA
L T
PL
SH
AR
E
$0N
O P
AR
T D
16,0
080
$0$0
$0$0
PA
RT
D-L
IS18
,916
0$0
$0$0
$0P
AR
T D
-NO
LIS
27,6
700
$0$0
$0$0
TO
TA
L62
,594
0$0
$0$0
$0
$0.0
1-$3
20.0
0N
O P
AR
T D
6,08
452
,557
$727
,310
$242
,753
$443
,585
$40,
972
PA
RT
D-L
IS14
,613
147,
596
$1,8
58,8
43$2
07,7
82$4
18,9
09$1
,232
,152
PA
RT
D-N
O L
IS34
,191
385,
147
$4,5
91,9
93$7
23,9
01$2
,465
,598
$1,4
02,4
93T
OT
AL
54,8
8858
5,30
0$7
,178
,145
$1,1
74,4
37$3
,328
,092
$2,6
75,6
17
$320
.01-
$2,9
60.0
0N
O P
AR
T D
9,10
428
8,67
5$1
1,73
2,52
3$8
,244
,379
$2,8
07,3
61$6
80,7
83P
AR
T D
-LIS
26,8
2482
1,60
7$3
4,59
9,23
8$4
,800
,224
$2,9
53,8
66$2
6,84
5,14
8P
AR
T D
-NO
LIS
64,5
392,
079,
986
$82,
225,
842
$20,
557,
884
$16,
878,
191
$44,
789,
767
TO
TA
L10
0,46
73,
190,
268
$128
,557
,603
$33,
602,
487
$22,
639,
418
$72,
315,
698
> $
2,96
0.00
NO
PA
RT
D7,
621
528,
428
$62,
022,
670
$54,
102,
080
$5,2
02,0
87$2
,718
,503
PA
RT
D-L
IS17
,756
966,
400
$107
,967
,755
$15,
615,
086
$4,4
08,9
37$8
7,94
3,73
3P
AR
T D
-NO
LIS
47,5
242,
810,
517
$359
,260
,159
$95,
737,
408
$25,
770,
222
$237
,752
,530
TO
TA
L72
,901
4,30
5,34
5$5
29,2
50,5
85$1
65,4
54,5
74$3
5,38
1,24
5$3
28,4
14,7
65
$2,9
60.0
0-$6
,680
.00/
$7,0
61.7
6 *
NO
PA
RT
D4,
812
281,
103
$22,
410,
929
$18,
493,
895
$2,7
78,1
48$1
,138
,886
PA
RT
D-L
IS12
,903
649,
089
$58,
264,
686
$7,0
54,5
86$2
,817
,512
$48,
392,
588
PA
RT
D-N
O L
IS31
,768
1,64
8,87
8$1
46,3
36,3
54$4
4,68
4,66
7$1
5,25
7,80
4$8
6,39
3,88
3T
OT
AL
49,4
832,
579,
070
$227
,011
,969
$70,
233,
148
$20,
853,
463
$135
,925
,358
> $
6,68
0.00
/$7,
061.
76 *
NO
PA
RT
D2,
809
247,
325
$39,
611,
742
$35,
608,
185
$2,4
23,9
40$1
,579
,617
PA
RT
D-L
IS4,
853
317,
311
$49,
703,
069
$8,5
60,5
00$1
,591
,425
$39,
551,
144
PA
RT
D-N
O L
IS15
,756
1,16
1,63
9$2
12,9
23,8
05$5
1,05
2,74
0$1
0,51
2,41
8$1
51,3
58,6
46T
OT
AL
23,4
181,
726,
275
$302
,238
,616
$95,
221,
426
$14,
527,
782
$192
,489
,408
TO
TA
LN
O P
AR
T D
38,8
1786
9,66
0$7
4,48
2,50
3$6
2,58
9,21
3$8
,453
,032
$3,4
40,2
58P
AR
T D
-LIS
78,1
091,
935,
603
$144
,425
,837
$20,
623,
092
$7,7
81,7
12$1
16,0
21,0
32P
AR
T D
-NO
LIS
173,
924
5,27
5,65
0$4
46,0
77,9
94$1
17,0
19,1
93$4
5,11
4,01
1$2
83,9
44,7
90T
OT
AL
290,
850
8,08
0,91
3$6
64,9
86,3
33$2
00,2
31,4
98$6
1,34
8,75
5$4
03,4
06,0
81
TA
BL
E 4
.5A
NN
UA
L D
RU
G E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
FO
R P
AC
E/P
AC
EN
ET
EN
RO
LL
ED
BY
TO
TA
L D
RU
G S
PE
ND
, PA
RT
D S
TA
TU
S, A
ND
LIS
ST
AT
US
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
* C
AT
AS
TR
OP
HIC
TH
RE
SH
OLD
VA
RIE
S B
Y L
IS S
TA
TU
S:
$6,6
80.0
0 F
OR
LIS
, $7,
061.
76 F
OR
NO
N-L
IS D
UR
ING
201
5.
61
5055606570758085
CENT
XS
EP
TE
MB
ER
200
6--P
AC
E B
EG
INS
A
UT
O-E
NR
OLL
ME
NT
IN
ME
DIC
AR
E P
AR
T D
FIG
UR
E 4
.2P
AC
E G
EN
ER
IC U
TIL
IZA
TIO
N R
AT
ES
BY
QU
AR
TE
RD
EC
EM
BE
R 1
98
8 -
DE
CE
MB
ER
20
15
15202530354045
12/8
812
/89
12/9
012
/91
12/9
212
/93
12/9
412
/95
12/9
612
/97
12/9
812
/99
12/0
012
/01
12/0
212
/03
12/0
412
/05
12/0
612
/07
12/0
812
/09
12/1
012
/11
12/1
212
/13
12/1
412
/15
PERC
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/MO
NT
HLY
CO
ST
CO
NT
AIN
ME
NT
RE
PO
RT
. D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
PA
CE
AN
D P
AC
EN
ET
OR
IGIN
AL,
PA
ID C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E.
XX
X
X
XN
OV
EM
BE
R 1
996-
-PA
CE
AC
T M
AN
DA
TE
S
GE
NE
RIC
SU
BS
TIT
UT
ION
OF
A-R
AT
ED
P
RO
DU
CT
S
QU
AR
TE
R E
ND
ING
JAN
UA
RY
200
4--P
AC
E IN
TR
OD
UC
ES
D
IFF
ER
EN
TIA
L C
OP
AY
ME
NT
S F
OR
B
RA
ND
AN
D G
EN
ER
IC P
RO
DU
CT
S
X
DE
CE
MB
ER
198
8--A
ME
ND
ME
NT
TO
PA
GE
NE
RIC
DR
UG
LA
WS
UM
ME
R 1
989-
-FD
A IN
VE
ST
IGA
TIO
NS
OF
FR
AU
D IN
TH
E G
EN
ER
IC IN
DU
ST
RY
BE
GIN
JUL
Y 1
990-
-FD
A 'O
RA
NG
E B
OO
K' B
EC
OM
ES
ST
AN
DA
RD
FO
R G
EN
ER
IC S
UB
ST
ITU
TIO
N IN
PA
JU
LY
199
1--P
AC
E C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
CO
PA
Y A
DJU
ST
ED
TO
$6.
00D
EC
EM
BE
R 1
992-
-AM
EN
DM
EN
T T
O P
AC
E L
AW
RE
QU
IRIN
G G
EN
ER
IC S
UB
ST
ITU
TIO
N O
N O
RA
L R
XS
X
62
SECTION 5
COUNTY DATA
63
64
PA
GE
1
NU
MB
ER
OF
NU
MB
ER
OF
P
AC
EP
AC
EN
ET
TO
TA
LE
NR
OLL
ED
EN
RO
LLE
DN
UM
BE
R%
OF
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
NU
MB
ER
OF
ST
AT
EP
AC
EP
AC
EN
ET
PA
CE
PA
CE
NE
TC
OU
NT
YC
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
SE
NR
OL
LE
D*
TO
TA
LC
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
PR
OV
IDE
RS
SH
AR
EC
LA
IMS
CL
AIM
SS
TA
TE
SH
AR
ES
TA
TE
SH
AR
E
PE
NN
SY
LV
AN
IA1
18
,76
91
76
,43
82
90
,85
01
00
.02
28
,25
63
,02
07
8.7
$2
00
,23
1,4
98
3,2
27
,12
54
,85
3,7
88
$7
9,6
02
,41
8$
12
0,6
29
,07
9
AD
AM
S
91
51
,37
72
,26
30
.81
,82
31
54
6.3
$1
,27
0,8
75
26
,51
44
1,0
25
$5
44
,83
4$
72
6,0
41
AL
LE
GH
EN
Y
10
,97
71
6,2
87
26
,87
79
.22
0,9
71
29
09
7.5
$1
8,4
83
,07
42
80
,67
94
20
,63
1$
7,5
71
,20
3$
10
,91
1,8
71
AR
MS
TR
ON
G
77
81
,27
32
,03
00
.71
,62
31
73
2.5
$1
,23
5,2
29
22
,84
93
3,3
81
$4
33
,21
0$
80
2,0
19
BE
AV
ER
1
,70
83
,35
94
,99
31
.73
,98
34
27
4.2
$3
,52
8,7
57
44
,90
98
6,6
29
$1
,28
3,1
86
$2
,24
5,5
71
BE
DF
OR
D
94
11
,37
02
,27
40
.81
,80
41
51
6.2
$2
,08
3,2
19
28
,39
04
2,0
37
$8
33
,28
7$
1,2
49
,93
2
BE
RK
S
2,9
87
5,1
75
8,0
65
2.8
6,2
84
73
76
.3$
4,2
23
,18
07
6,5
89
13
5,3
39
$1
,42
2,5
14
$2
,80
0,6
66
BL
AIR
1
,84
92
,94
84
,72
81
.63
,65
23
97
6.6
$3
,91
6,3
45
55
,33
68
6,6
05
$1
,60
1,0
40
$2
,31
5,3
05
BR
AD
FO
RD
8
43
1,1
49
1,9
42
0.7
1,4
68
14
27
.8$
97
3,1
44
20
,14
42
7,6
56
$3
88
,31
6$
58
4,8
29
BU
CK
S
3,1
76
5,0
48
8,0
98
2.8
6,4
22
13
99
1.2
$7
,92
5,2
21
86
,34
21
33
,34
0$
3,2
61
,13
6$
4,6
64
,08
6
BU
TL
ER
1
,54
12
,55
14
,02
51
.43
,16
84
35
8.0
$2
,78
1,5
08
42
,11
77
1,5
88
$1
,05
1,0
24
$1
,73
0,4
84
CA
MB
RIA
2
,29
13
,52
05
,74
32
.04
,43
54
06
8.0
$5
,25
8,7
76
71
,41
09
6,2
77
$2
,29
2,0
74
$2
,96
6,7
02
CA
ME
RO
N
70
15
42
20
0.1
17
31
52
.7$
15
6,6
13
2,0
46
4,0
97
$4
3,0
15
$1
13
,59
8
PO
PU
LAT
ION
TA
BL
E 5
.1N
UM
BE
R A
ND
PE
RC
EN
T O
F P
AC
E A
ND
PA
CE
NE
T C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
AN
D N
UM
BE
R O
F P
RO
VID
ER
S B
Y C
OU
NT
YJ
AN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
01
5
NU
MB
ER
OF
% U
RB
AN
CA
RB
ON
9
97
1,4
28
2,3
88
0.8
1,8
57
11
52
.8$
1,3
08
,37
82
8,5
87
39
,47
9$
46
4,9
72
$8
43
,40
6
CE
NT
RE
8
49
1,4
05
2,2
26
0.8
1,7
46
29
67
.8$
96
2,2
39
23
,65
13
9,9
73
$2
94
,37
0$
66
7,8
69
CH
ES
TE
R
2,2
52
3,0
83
5,2
41
1.8
4,0
60
10
18
6.7
$4
,11
2,7
67
58
,98
07
9,7
43
$1
,52
1,8
76
$2
,59
0,8
91
CL
AR
ION
5
08
90
81
,39
80
.51
,10
61
32
3.4
$1
,20
0,5
26
16
,75
92
6,9
20
$4
44
,56
6$
75
5,9
60
CL
EA
RF
IEL
D
1,1
45
2,0
19
3,1
23
1.1
2,4
97
18
46
.2$
2,0
48
,32
13
2,5
79
58
,58
0$
67
8,1
97
$1
,37
0,1
23
CL
INT
ON
5
57
90
51
,43
30
.51
,16
18
54
.3$
88
8,5
51
16
,92
83
2,7
22
$2
88
,83
2$
59
9,7
19
CO
LU
MB
IA
1,0
72
1,6
01
2,6
39
0.9
2,1
16
14
59
.2$
1,4
34
,30
03
1,4
70
46
,26
2$
53
1,4
24
$9
02
,87
6
CR
AW
FO
RD
1
,01
91
,79
42
,78
91
.02
,16
82
13
6.3
$1
,74
5,6
86
26
,80
54
3,8
87
$7
27
,58
1$
1,0
18
,10
5
CU
MB
ER
LA
ND
1
,62
72
,80
84
,37
61
.53
,50
67
67
7.8
$2
,65
0,5
65
43
,91
87
7,9
56
$8
77
,16
6$
1,7
73
,39
9
DA
UP
HIN
1
,82
92
,56
54
,33
01
.53
,37
56
08
6.7
$2
,38
3,9
04
45
,53
66
8,2
64
$8
73
,33
7$
1,5
10
,56
6
DE
LA
WA
RE
3
,47
74
,71
88
,07
72
.86
,28
61
42
99
.5$
7,5
33
,61
78
4,5
67
11
9,5
85
$3
,21
5,4
09
$4
,31
8,2
08
EL
K
35
07
93
1,1
26
0.4
92
49
44
.3$
90
6,4
67
9,3
47
24
,13
7$
25
0,2
62
$6
56
,20
5
ER
IE
2,4
87
4,1
54
6,5
34
2.2
5,1
43
62
80
.0$
3,6
80
,74
46
2,8
46
10
7,9
80
$1
,34
2,7
14
$2
,33
8,0
30
FA
YE
TT
E
2,1
54
3,1
37
5,2
27
1.8
4,1
28
40
52
.1$
5,3
50
,24
36
1,4
27
92
,62
2$
2,3
81
,67
8$
2,9
68
,56
5
FO
RE
ST
8
01
72
25
00
.11
96
20
.0$
13
6,2
18
1,8
32
4,5
39
$3
5,7
59
$1
00
,45
9
FR
AN
KL
IN
1,2
18
1,9
33
3,1
10
1.1
2,4
73
26
59
.7$
1,9
04
,74
13
6,0
76
55
,63
7$
72
2,4
03
$1
,18
2,3
38
FU
LT
ON
2
05
29
84
93
0.2
36
53
0.0
$3
99
,39
26
,41
69
,49
2$
81
,50
3$
31
7,8
89
GR
EE
NE
3
42
48
98
19
0.3
63
79
33
.2$
53
3,4
61
9,1
33
13
,93
3$
22
4,6
73
$3
08
,78
9
65
PA
GE
2
NU
MB
ER
OF
NU
MB
ER
OF
P
AC
EP
AC
EN
ET
TO
TA
LE
NR
OLL
ED
EN
RO
LLE
DN
UM
BE
R%
OF
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
NU
MB
ER
OF
ST
AT
EP
AC
EP
AC
EN
ET
PA
CE
PA
CE
NE
TC
OU
NT
YC
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
SE
NR
OL
LE
D*
TO
TA
LC
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
PR
OV
IDE
RS
SH
AR
EC
LA
IMS
CL
AIM
SS
TA
TE
SH
AR
ES
TA
TE
SH
AR
EP
OP
ULA
TIO
N
TA
BL
E 5
.1N
UM
BE
R A
ND
PE
RC
EN
T O
F P
AC
E A
ND
PA
CE
NE
T C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
AN
D N
UM
BE
R O
F P
RO
VID
ER
S B
Y C
OU
NT
YJ
AN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
01
5
NU
MB
ER
OF
% U
RB
AN
HU
NT
ING
DO
N
63
41
,05
61
,65
90
.61
,33
28
31
.3$
1,1
09
,88
71
8,1
45
31
,83
1$
38
8,2
16
$7
21
,67
1
IND
IAN
A
96
71
,48
52
,41
30
.81
,86
61
73
9.9
$1
,57
7,9
35
28
,11
74
0,1
07
$6
77
,24
0$
90
0,6
95
JEF
FE
RS
ON
6
72
1,1
96
1,8
37
0.6
1,4
76
11
38
.5$
1,6
41
,84
32
0,6
64
37
,52
9$
61
1,0
71
$1
,03
0,7
72
JUN
IAT
A
34
25
39
86
10
.37
45
51
7.8
$5
31
,51
61
3,0
33
20
,90
9$
22
0,7
29
$3
10
,78
7
LA
CK
AW
AN
NA
3
,50
34
,31
17
,68
92
.66
,35
76
88
3.7
$5
,46
8,0
19
12
1,8
44
14
3,9
16
$2
,47
1,3
47
$2
,99
6,6
72
LA
NC
AS
TE
R
3,4
07
6,0
74
9,3
37
3.2
7,4
24
10
67
8.7
$5
,06
0,5
26
97
,53
71
80
,32
3$
1,6
38
,16
5$
3,4
22
,36
1
LA
WR
EN
CE
1
,28
02
,21
73
,45
21
.22
,81
82
45
9.7
$2
,57
0,7
87
35
,81
56
2,3
63
$9
94
,69
2$
1,5
76
,09
4
LE
BA
NO
N
1,1
63
1,9
89
3,1
09
1.1
2,3
87
25
73
.4$
1,3
76
,00
13
1,4
70
50
,35
6$
50
6,0
05
$8
69
,99
6
LE
HIG
H
2,3
56
3,6
37
5,9
13
2.0
4,6
64
72
92
.1$
3,4
12
,42
66
0,1
77
97
,85
0$
1,3
47
,89
9$
2,0
64
,52
7
LU
ZE
RN
E
5,6
83
6,8
30
12
,34
84
.21
0,1
85
90
80
.0$
8,5
01
,24
91
97
,56
32
37
,18
8$
3,7
45
,49
1$
4,7
55
,75
8
LY
CO
MIN
G
1,3
79
2,2
51
3,5
69
1.2
2,8
30
27
63
.7$
1,8
51
,07
84
0,8
50
67
,82
1$
63
6,1
96
$1
,21
4,8
81
MC
KE
AN
4
75
80
11
,26
00
.49
92
10
36
.5$
69
0,7
24
15
,43
72
4,4
74
$2
20
,00
9$
47
0,7
16
ME
RC
ER
1
,25
72
,59
53
,79
21
.32
,95
43
15
5.5
$3
,16
8,1
75
33
,31
87
2,9
98
$1
,07
9,8
45
$2
,08
8,3
30
MIF
FL
IN
80
11
,37
02
,14
10
.71
,80
71
04
9.5
$1
,14
5,5
96
29
,01
94
9,7
03
$3
76
,60
3$
76
8,9
93
MO
NR
OE
1
,34
61
,98
63
,28
51
.12
,47
03
56
1.7
$1
,81
8,7
34
30
,55
44
9,9
27
$6
43
,17
0$
1,1
75
,56
4
MO
NT
GO
ME
RY
4
,12
76
,15
01
0,1
33
3.5
8,0
73
19
39
7.1
$9
,22
2,6
91
10
9,5
86
16
1,2
86
$3
,79
0,2
33
$5
,43
2,4
58
MO
NT
OU
R
18
62
78
46
00
.23
78
74
6.2
$2
37
,51
35
,65
18
,41
4$
74
,21
6$
16
3,2
98
NO
RT
HA
MP
TO
N
2,6
05
4,2
94
6,8
13
2.3
5,4
43
64
87
.2$
3,8
48
,38
56
8,5
16
11
8,5
36
$1
,31
3,8
29
$2
,53
4,5
56
2,4
55
4,2
28
1.5
3,4
74
22
65
.1$
2,6
09
,66
66
3,8
57
77
,10
1$
1,0
30
,64
0$
1,5
79
,02
6
PE
RR
Y
45
77
35
1,1
75
0.4
97
08
11
.5$
77
8,6
34
12
,84
52
0,2
78
$2
71
,44
9$
50
7,1
86
PH
ILA
DE
LP
HIA
1
5,4
59
15
,57
03
0,4
74
10
.52
1,9
51
45
81
00
.0$
21
,75
4,9
31
31
8,1
95
34
9,1
44
$1
0,5
87
,01
2$
11
,16
7,9
20
PIK
E
47
26
74
1,1
32
0.4
79
81
02
9.2
$5
94
,75
21
0,3
09
13
,62
0$
23
9,7
63
$3
54
,99
0
PO
TT
ER
2
53
37
86
17
0.2
45
64
0.0
$4
52
,45
66
,65
81
0,1
94
$1
23
,24
7$
32
9,2
10
SC
HU
YL
KIL
L
2,8
62
3,7
67
6,5
43
2.2
5,3
12
33
63
.5$
3,6
03
,84
99
2,0
20
11
2,4
79
$1
,57
0,8
97
$2
,03
2,9
52
SN
YD
ER
3
97
77
81
,16
00
.49
72
83
3.2
$7
75
,47
81
3,8
91
24
,06
3$
22
0,6
57
$5
54
,82
2
SO
ME
RS
ET
1
,41
52
,19
03
,55
91
.22
,90
11
72
9.2
$3
,39
2,2
93
48
,48
06
7,3
08
$1
,41
4,0
11
$1
,97
8,2
82
SU
LL
IVA
N
11
41
23
23
40
.11
97
10
.0$
17
6,7
51
3,5
94
3,3
89
$7
2,4
95
$1
04
,25
6
SU
SQ
UE
HA
NN
A
52
56
57
1,1
65
0.4
86
49
16
.0$
66
7,6
24
14
,14
71
6,3
03
$3
01
,54
8$
36
6,0
76
TIO
GA
6
02
84
91
,42
10
.51
,05
19
9.9
$8
71
,92
01
5,7
67
20
,43
3$
31
4,5
13
$5
57
,40
7
UN
ION
4
09
72
41
,11
70
.49
30
10
57
.2$
69
8,0
36
13
,99
22
1,8
09
$2
32
,02
2$
46
6,0
14
NO
RT
HU
MB
ER
LA
ND
1
,84
9
66
PA
GE
3
NU
MB
ER
OF
NU
MB
ER
OF
P
AC
EP
AC
EN
ET
TO
TA
LE
NR
OLL
ED
EN
RO
LLE
DN
UM
BE
R%
OF
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
NU
MB
ER
OF
ST
AT
EP
AC
EP
AC
EN
ET
PA
CE
PA
CE
NE
TC
OU
NT
YC
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
SE
NR
OL
LE
D*
TO
TA
LC
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
PR
OV
IDE
RS
SH
AR
EC
LA
IMS
CL
AIM
SS
TA
TE
SH
AR
ES
TA
TE
SH
AR
EP
OP
ULA
TIO
N
TA
BL
E 5
.1N
UM
BE
R A
ND
PE
RC
EN
T O
F P
AC
E A
ND
PA
CE
NE
T C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
AN
D N
UM
BE
R O
F P
RO
VID
ER
S B
Y C
OU
NT
YJ
AN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
01
5
NU
MB
ER
OF
% U
RB
AN
VE
NA
NG
O
56
41
,08
21
,61
80
.61
,25
51
24
5.2
$1
,38
5,0
28
14
,53
82
8,4
20
$4
57
,36
6$
92
7,6
62
WA
RR
EN
3
69
73
11
,08
30
.48
04
94
5.0
$6
34
,83
68
,08
31
7,1
50
$1
94
,76
9$
44
0,0
67
WA
SH
ING
TO
N
2,0
20
3,3
96
5,3
32
1.8
4,1
71
46
69
.2$
3,5
23
,27
55
0,4
37
88
,12
4$
1,1
53
,95
7$
2,3
69
,31
8
WA
YN
E
69
29
47
1,6
15
0.6
1,2
51
10
11
.9$
93
5,8
36
20
,35
92
6,6
65
$3
68
,19
2$
56
7,6
44
WE
ST
MO
RE
LA
ND
4
,36
57
,22
51
1,4
27
3.9
9,2
29
85
74
.6$
7,7
96
,14
81
15
,86
51
95
,68
3$
2,9
83
,14
1$
4,8
13
,00
7
WY
OM
ING
3
55
49
28
35
0.3
64
99
16
.5$
52
2,4
34
10
,26
21
5,2
37
$2
11
,95
3$
31
0,4
82
YO
RK
3
,16
36
,18
59
,20
73
.27
,27
08
57
5.3
$4
,80
8,4
01
82
,34
81
70
,54
1$
1,4
38
,27
4$
3,3
70
,12
7
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
FIL
E; C
LA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
NO
TE
: D
AT
A IN
CL
UD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
CL
AIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E.
* T
OT
AL
NU
MB
ER
EN
RO
LL
ED
IS A
N U
ND
UP
LIC
AT
ED
CO
UN
T O
F C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
, SO
ME
OF
WH
OM
MA
Y H
AV
E B
EE
N E
NR
OL
LE
D IN
BO
TH
PR
OG
RA
MS
DU
RIN
G T
HE
YE
AR
.
67
PE
NN
SY
LV
AN
IA S
EN
IOR
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
EN
RO
LL
ED
CIT
IZE
N P
OP
UL
AT
ION
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
SC
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
N =
2,1
34,5
21N
= 2
28,2
56N
= 2
90,8
50
PA
CE
AN
D P
AC
EN
ET
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
, C
LA
IM,
AN
D P
RO
VID
ER
IN
FO
RM
AT
ION
BY
CO
UN
TY
TY
PE
(P
ER
CE
NT
OF
CO
UN
TY
PO
PU
LA
TIO
N L
IVIN
G I
N U
RB
AN
AR
EA
)J
AN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
01
5
FIG
UR
E 5
.1
0.5%
2.9%
9.1%
22.4
%
56.0
%
9.2%
0.5%
3.7%
11.3
%
27.1
%47
.8%
9.6%
0.5%
3.7%
11.1
%
26.8
%47
.4%
10.5
%
TO
TA
L C
LA
IMS
PE
NN
SY
LV
AN
IA C
OU
NT
IES
PA
CE
PR
OV
IDE
RS
N =
8,0
80,9
13N
= 6
7N
= 3
,020
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CA
RD
HO
LDE
R F
ILE
, C
LAIM
S H
IST
OR
Y,
AN
D 2
014
PO
PU
LAT
ION
ES
TIM
AT
ES
NO
TE
: D
AT
A I
NC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
CLA
IMS
BY
DA
TE
OF
SE
RV
ICE
.
0.6%
4.0%
11.7
%
27.6
%47
.9%
8.3%
6.0%
11.9
% 26.9
%29
.9%
23.9
%1.
5%0.
3%2.
6%7.
4%
19.6
%
55.0
%
15.2
%
0.00
% U
rban
0.01
-25.
00%
Urb
an25
.01-
50.0
0% U
rban
50.0
1-75
.00%
Urb
an75
.01-
99.9
9% U
rban
100.
00%
Urb
an
68
FIG
UR
E 5
.2P
ER
CE
NT
OF
EL
DE
RLY
EN
RO
LL
ED
IN
PA
CE
/PA
CE
NE
T A
ND
PE
RC
EN
T U
RB
AN
PO
PU
LA
TIO
N B
Y C
OU
NT
Y(S
TAT
EW
IDE
PE
RC
EN
T E
NR
OL
LE
D =
13.
6%)
JAN
UA
RY
-DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
16.0
BR
AD
FO
RD
17.4
CR
AW
FO
RD
14.9
ER
IE
16.3
MC
KE
AN
16.4
PO
TT
ER
13.8
SU
SQ
UE
HA
NN
A
17.1
TIO
GA
12.8
WA
RR
EN
152
WA
YN
E
19.2
CA
ME
RO
N
20.0
CLA
RIO
N20
.9C
LIN
TO
N
17.6
ELK
15.6
FO
RE
ST JE
FF
ER
SO
N
19.3
LAC
KA
WA
NN
A
20.4
LUZ
ER
NE
17.5
LYC
OM
ING
16.6
ME
RC
ER
9.9
PIK
E13
.7S
ULL
IVA
N
15.2
VE
NA
NG
O
15.2
16.1
WY
OM
ING
14.9
AR
MS
TR
ON
G
14.9
BE
AV
ER
12.7
BU
TLE
R18
.8C
AR
BO
N
11.3
CE
NT
RE
20.4
CLE
AR
FIE
LD22
.9C
OLU
MB
IA
16.0
IND
IAN
A21.2
19.5
LAW
RE
NC
E
103
LEH
IGH
227
MIF
FLI
N
13.1
MO
NR
OE
12.5
MO
NT
OU
R
13.0
NO
RT
HA
MP
TO
N22
.9
NO
RT
HU
MB
ER
LAN
D
23.2
SC
HU
YLK
ILL
17.3
SN
YD
ER
15.5
UN
ION
12.6
ALL
EG
HE
NY
12.3
BE
RK
S19
.4
BLA
IR
7.7
BU
CK
S
20.5
CA
MB
RIA
10.5
CU
MB
ER
LAN
D
10.4
DA
UP
HIN
19.4
HU
NT
ING
DO
N17
.5JU
NIA
TA
LAN
CA
ST
ER
12.4
LEB
AN
ON
10.3
22.7
7.6
MO
NT
GO
ME
RY
16.2
PE
RR
Y
13.5
WA
SH
ING
TO
N15
.4W
ES
TM
OR
ELA
ND
12.2
AD
AM
S
22.7
BE
DF
OR
D
7.0
CH
ES
TE
R
9.5
DE
LAW
AR
E20
.0F
AY
ET
TE
11.2
FR
AN
KLI
N17
.1F
ULT
ON
12.7
GR
EE
NE
10.7
CS
15.6
PH
ILA
DE
LPH
IA
22.9
SO
ME
RS
ET
13.1
YO
RK
0.00
% U
rban
0.01
-25
.00
% U
rban
25.0
1-5
0.0
0%
Urb
anP
ER
CE
NT
UR
BA
N P
OP
ULA
TIO
N
50.0
1-7
5.0
0%
Urb
an75
.01-
99
.99
% U
rban
100.
00%
Urb
an
CO
UN
TIE
S W
ITH
HIG
HE
ST
PE
RC
EN
T E
NR
OLL
ED
: SC
HU
YLK
ILL
(23.
2%),
SO
ME
RS
ET
(22
.9%
), A
ND
CO
LUM
BIA
(22
.9%
)
CO
UN
TIE
S W
ITH
LO
WE
ST
PE
RC
EN
T E
NR
OLL
ED
: CH
ES
TE
R (
7.0%
), M
ON
TG
OM
ER
Y (
7.6%
), A
ND
BU
CK
S (
7.7%
)
SO
UR
CE
S:
CA
RD
HO
LDE
R F
ILE
, CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
, AN
D 2
014
INT
ER
CE
NS
AL
ES
TIM
AT
ES
69
70
SECTION 6
PROVIDER DATA
71
72
PR
OV
IDE
RT
YP
EN
O.
%N
O.
%N
O.
%N
O.
%N
O.
%
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
943
31.3
123,
937
12.5
33,8
313.
483
5,33
984
.199
3,10
710
0.0
PH
AR
MA
CIE
S
DIS
PE
NS
ING
331.
138
164
.826
4.4
181
30.8
588
100.
0P
HY
SIC
IAN
S
INS
TIT
UT
ION
AL
270.
974
97.
744
04.
58,
524
87.8
9,71
310
0.0
PH
AR
MA
CIE
S
CH
AIN
1,84
061
.123
8,64
812
.567
,275
3.5
1,59
7,38
383
.91,
903,
306
100.
0P
HA
RM
AC
IES
NU
RS
ING
HO
ME
133
4.4
29,6
8710
.08,
444
2.8
259,
238
87.2
297,
369
100.
0P
HA
RM
AC
IES
MA
IL O
RD
ER
331.
14,
264
13.3
1,29
24.
026
,507
82.7
32,0
6310
0.0
PH
AR
MA
CIE
S
HO
ME
INF
US
ION
20.
10
0.0
337
.55
62.5
810
0.0
PH
AR
MA
CIE
S
TO
TA
L3,
011
100.
039
7,66
612
.311
1,31
13.
42,
727,
177
84.3
3,23
6,15
410
0.0
SO
UR
CE
: PD
A/P
S-0
-100
, CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
NO
TE
: DA
TA
INC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
CLA
IMS
BY
DA
TE
OF
PA
YM
EN
T, E
XC
LUD
E P
AC
EN
ET
CLA
IMS
.
TA
BL
E 6
.1P
AC
E C
LA
IMS
BY
PR
OD
UC
T A
ND
PR
OV
IDE
R T
YP
EJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
PR
OV
IDE
RS
BR
AN
D S
ING
LE-S
OU
RC
EB
RA
ND
MU
LTI-
SO
UR
CE
GE
NE
RIC
TO
TA
L C
LAIM
S
73
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
$13,
203,
044
51.3
$106
.53
$2,7
09,8
0110
.5$8
0.10
$9,8
32,1
2338
.2$1
1.77
$25,
744,
968
100.
0$2
5.92
PH
AR
MA
CIE
S
DIS
PE
NS
ING
$350
,778
87.7
$920
.68
$4,3
881.
1$1
68.7
6$4
4,91
611
.2$2
48.1
6$4
00,0
8210
0.0
$680
.41
PH
YS
ICIA
NS
INS
TIT
UT
ION
AL
$400
,044
80.3
$534
.10
$21,
214
4.3
$48.
21$7
6,65
915
.4$8
.99
$497
,918
100.
0$5
1.26
PH
AR
MA
CIE
S
CH
AIN
$24,
059,
514
52.0
$100
.82
$5,0
18,8
2310
.8$7
4.60
$17,
212,
703
37.2
$10.
78$4
6,29
1,04
110
0.0
$24.
32P
HA
RM
AC
IES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
%
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
%
BR
AN
D S
ING
LE-S
OU
RC
E
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
%
TA
BL
E 6
.2P
AC
E E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
AN
D A
VE
RA
GE
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
BY
PR
OD
UC
T A
ND
PR
OV
IDE
R T
YP
EJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
PR
OV
IDE
R
TY
PE
BR
AN
D M
ULT
I-S
OU
RC
EG
EN
ER
ICT
OT
AL,
ALL
PR
OD
UC
TS
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
%
AV
ER
AG
E
ST
AT
E
SH
AR
E
AV
ER
AG
E
ST
AT
E
SH
AR
E
AV
ER
AG
E
ST
AT
E
SH
AR
E
AV
ER
AG
E
ST
AT
E
SH
AR
E
NU
RS
ING
HO
ME
$2,2
87,9
5543
.2$7
7.07
$622
,656
11.8
$73.
74$2
,381
,787
45.0
$9.1
9$5
,292
,398
100.
0$1
7.80
PH
AR
MA
CIE
S
MA
IL O
RD
ER
$1,0
92,2
7584
.7$2
56.1
6$6
9,56
85.
4$5
3.85
$128
,427
10.0
$4.8
5$1
,290
,271
100.
0$4
0.24
PH
AR
MA
CIE
S
HO
ME
INF
US
ION
$00.
0
–
$741
42.1
$247
.01
$1,0
1957
.9$2
03.8
2$1
,760
100.
0$2
20.0
1P
HA
RM
AC
IES
TO
TA
L$4
1,39
3,61
052
.1$1
04.0
9$8
,447
,191
10.6
$75.
89$2
9,67
7,63
637
.3$1
0.88
$79,
518,
436
100.
0$2
4.57
SO
UR
CE
: PD
A/P
S-0
-100
, CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
NO
TE
: DA
TA
INC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
CLA
IMS
BY
DA
TE
OF
PA
YM
EN
T, E
XC
LUD
E P
AC
EN
ET
CLA
IMS
.
74
TA
BL
E 6
.3P
AC
EN
ET
CL
AIM
S A
ND
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S B
Y P
RO
VID
ER
TY
PE
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
CO
PA
IDT
OT
AL
CA
RD
HO
LDE
RO
TH
ER
PA
YE
RS
TA
TE
SH
AR
ET
OT
AL
CLA
IMS
CLA
IMS
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SE
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
IND
EP
EN
DE
NT
P
HA
RM
AC
IES
1,03
795
122
4,48
21,
160,
562
1,38
5,04
428
.6$1
2,56
9,51
4$6
8,38
3,55
7$3
5,90
9,59
9$1
16,8
62,6
7028
.0
DIS
PE
NS
ING
P
HY
SIC
IAN
S12
539
565
065
50.
0$1
0,74
0$1
,954
,056
$396
,814
$2,3
61,6
100.
6
INS
TIT
UT
ION
AL
PH
AR
MA
CIE
S30
291,
357
8,28
09,
637
0.2
$73,
920
$1,2
40,9
87$3
66,4
50$1
,681
,357
0.4
CH
AIN
P
HA
RM
AC
IES
1,85
91,
844
489,
190
2,48
3,67
82,
972,
868
61.3
$28,
119,
936
$150
,827
,724
$72,
259,
645
$251
,207
,306
60.2
NU
RS
ING
HO
ME
P
HA
RM
AC
IES
141
133
54,8
3233
4,48
838
9,32
08.
0$2
,976
,737
$13,
006,
462
$6,5
31,3
87$2
2,51
4,58
65.
4
MA
IL O
RD
ER
P
HA
RM
AC
IES
6136
4,44
187
,648
92,0
891.
9$1
,274
,422
$16,
526,
614
$4,6
07,9
22$2
2,40
8,95
75.
4
HO
ME
INF
US
ION
P
HA
RM
AC
IES
33
465
690.
0$1
,103
$104
,910
$19,
687
$125
,700
0.0
TO
TA
L (A
LL
PR
OV
IDE
RS
)3,
256
3,03
577
4,31
14,
075,
371
4,84
9,68
210
0.0
$45,
026,
372
$252
,044
,310
$120
,091
,504
$417
,162
,186
100.
0
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
NO
TE
: D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
OR
IGIN
AL,
PA
ID C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F P
AY
ME
NT
.
PA
CE
NE
T C
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S W
HO
AR
E N
OT
EN
RO
LLE
D IN
PA
RT
D A
RE
RE
QU
IRE
D T
O P
AY
TH
E B
EN
CH
MA
RK
AM
OU
NT
PR
IOR
TO
AN
Y P
AC
EN
ET
CLA
IM C
OV
ER
AG
E.
EN
RO
LLE
D
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S
PR
OV
IDE
R T
YP
E
PR
OV
IDE
RS
% O
FC
LAIM
SD
ED
UC
TIB
LE
CLA
IMS
1
CLA
IMS
% O
F T
OT
AL
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
SP
AR
TIC
I-P
AT
ING
1 IN 2
015,
TH
E M
ON
TH
LY P
AC
EN
ET
DE
DU
CT
IBLE
WA
S C
HA
NG
ED
TO
$33
.91
TO
CO
INC
IDE
WIT
H T
HE
RE
GIO
NA
L M
ED
ICA
RE
PA
RT
D P
RE
MIU
M B
EN
CH
MA
RK
.
75
TABLE 6.4
PACENET CLAIMS VOLUME BY PHASE OF COVERAGE1, PRODUCT TYPE, AND PROVIDER TYPEJANUARY - DECEMBER 2015
PROVIDER TYPE NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. %
INDEPENDENT PHARMACIES 3,890 1.7 1,446 0.6 219,146 97.6 224,482 100.0
DISPENSING PHYSICIANS 0 0.0 0 0.0 5 100.0 5 100.0
INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACIES 50 3.7 43 3.2 1,264 93.1 1,357 100.0
CHAIN PHARMACIES 8,250 1.7 3,934 0.8 477,006 97.5 489,190 100.0
NURSING HOME PHARMACIES 1,429 2.6 426 0.8 52,977 96.6 54,832 100.0
MAIL ORDER PHARMACIES 95 2.1 33 0.7 4,313 97.1 4,441 100.0
HOME INFUSION PHARMACIES 1 25.0 1 25.0 2 50.0 4 100.0
TOTAL (ALL PROVIDERS) 13,715 1.8 5,883 0.8 754,713 97.5 774,311 100.0
PROVIDER TYPE NO. % NO. % NO. % NO. %
INDEPENDENT PHARMACIES 179,337 15.5 42,497 3.7 938,728 80.9 1,160,562 100.0
DISPENSING PHYSICIANS 445 68.5 70 10.8 135 20.8 650 100.0
INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACIES 932 11.3 356 4.3 6,992 84.4 8,280 100.0
CHAIN PHARMACIES 397,621 16.0 89,338 3.6 1,996,719 80.4 2,483,678 100.0
NURSING HOME PHARMACIES 41,247 12.3 10,451 3.1 282,790 84.5 334,488 100.0
MAIL ORDER PHARMACIES 10,362 11.8 3,555 4.1 73,731 84.1 87,648 100.0
HOME INFUSION PHARMACIES 26 40.0 0 0.0 39 60.0 65 100.0
TOTAL (ALL PROVIDERS) 629,970 15.5 146,267 3.6 3,299,134 81.0 4,075,371 100.0
DEDUCTIBLE PHASE CLAIMS
COPAYMENT PHASE CLAIMS
SINGLE-SOURCE MULTI-SOURCE GENERICBRAND BRAND
1IN 2015, THE MONTHLY PACENET DEDUCTIBLE WAS CHANGED TO $33.91 TO COINCIDE WITH THE REGIONALMEDICARE PART D PREMIUM BENCHMARK. PACENET CARDHOLDERS WHO ARE NOT ENROLLED IN PART D ARE REQUIRED TO PAY THE BENCHMARK AMOUNT PRIOR TO ANY PACENET CLAIM COVERAGE. THE DEDUCT-IBLE AND COPAYMENT PHASES DIFFER IN THE TYPES OF CLAIMS SUBMITTED. LOW-PRICED PRESCRIPTIONS
TOTAL(ALL PRODUCTS)
SINGLE-SOURCE MULTI-SOURCE GENERIC (ALL PRODUCTS)BRAND BRAND TOTAL
SOURCE: PDA/CLAIMS HISTORYNOTE: DATA INCLUDE ORIGINAL, PAID CLAIMS BY DATE OF PAYMENT.
THE DEDUCTIBLE. GENERIC UTILIZATION RATES MAY THEREFORE BE HIGHER IN THE DEDUCTIBLE PHASE
FOR WHICH THE TOTAL PRICE IS LESS THAN THE $8 OR $15 COPAY ARE NOT NECESSARILY SUBMITTED DURING THE COPAYMENT PHASE, BUT MAY BE SUBMITTED DURING THE DEDUCTIBLE PHASE TO SATISFY
DUE TO THE OVER-REPRESENTATION OF LOW-PRICED GENERIC CLAIMS.
76
TABLE 6.5PACENET EXPENDITURES BY PHASE OF COVERAGE, PRODUCT TYPE, AND PROVIDER TYPE
JANUARY - DECEMBER 2015
PAGE 1
A. DEDUCTIBLE PHASE CLAIMS1
PROVIDER TYPE AMOUNT % AMOUNT % AMOUNT % AMOUNT %
INDEPENDENT PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $83,780 5.2 $28,185 1.8 $1,498,630 93.1 $1,610,595 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $823,304 40.4 $164,898 8.1 $1,049,972 51.5 $2,038,175 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $1,433 72.3 $48 2.4 $502 25.3 $1,983 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $908,517 24.9 $193,130 5.3 $2,549,104 69.8 $3,650,752 100.0
DISPENSING PHYSICIANS
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $21 100.0 $21 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $173 100.0 $173 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $0 – $0 – $0 – $0 –
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $194 100.0 $194 100.0
INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $378 4.0 $311 3.3 $8,779 92.7 $9,468 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $2,063 30.4 $511 7.5 $4,225 62.1 $6,800 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $0 – $0 – $0 – $0 –
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,441 15.0 $822 5.1 $13,004 79.9 $16,268 100.0
CHAIN PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $202,228 5.9 $76,512 2.2 $3,159,384 91.9 $3,438,124 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $1,842,639 40.7 $356,065 7.9 $2,323,903 51.4 $4,522,607 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $2,011 37.1 $1,321 24.4 $2,090 38.5 $5,422 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,046,877 25.7 $433,899 5.5 $5,485,377 68.9 $7,966,153 100.0
NURSING HOME PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $24,753 6.8 $6,360 1.7 $335,664 91.5 $366,777 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $257,093 41.8 $49,879 8.1 $307,492 50.0 $614,464 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $2,267 50.6 $1,176 26.2 $1,041 23.2 $4,484 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $284,113 28.8 $57,414 5.8 $644,197 65.4 $985,725 100.0
MAIL ORDER PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $3,650 8.5 $1,206 2.8 $38,126 88.7 $42,983 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $168,816 77.1 $7,527 3.4 $42,701 19.5 $219,044 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $1,209 99.1 $12 0.9 $0 0.0 $1,221 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $173,675 66.0 $8,745 3.3 $80,827 30.7 $263,247 100.0
HOME INFUSION PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $7 10.5 $11 17.9 $45 71.6 $63 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $1,499 94.2 $0 0.0 $93 5.8 $1,592 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $0 – $0 – $0 – $0 –
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,505 91.0 $11 0.7 $138 8.3 $1,655 100.0
TOTAL (ALL PROVIDERS)
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $314,795 5.8 $112,586 2.1 $5,040,650 92.2 $5,468,030 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $3,095,414 41.8 $578,881 7.8 $3,728,559 50.4 $7,402,854 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $6,920 52.8 $2,556 19.5 $3,633 27.7 $13,109 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $3,417,130 26.5 $694,022 5.4 $8,772,841 68.1 $12,883,993 100.0
SOURCE: PDA/CLAIMS HISTORYNOTE: DATA INCLUDE ORIGINAL, PAID CLAIMS BY DATE OF PAYMENT.
THE OUTSTANDING DEDUCTIBLE AMOUNT AND A COPAYMENT, WHILE PACENET COVERS THE REMAINING COST, IF ANY, OF
1IN 2015, THE MONTHLY PACENET DEDUCTIBLE WAS CHANGED TO $33.91 TO COINCIDE WITH THE REGIONAL MEDICARE PART D
BENCHMARK PREMIUM. STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES FOR DEDUCTIBLE CLAIMS ARE ONLY INCURRED FOR TRANSITION
CLAIMS WHICH COMPLETE THE $33.91 MONTHLY DEDUCTIBLE ACCUMULATION. FOR THESE CLAIMS, THE CARDHOLDER PAYS
THE PRESCRIPTION.
BRAND BRAND
SINGLE-SOURCE MULTI-SOURCE GENERIC ALL PRODUCTS
77
TABLE 6.5PACENET EXPENDITURES BY PHASE OF COVERAGE, PRODUCT TYPE, AND PROVIDER TYPE
JANUARY - DECEMBER 2015
PAGE 2
B. COPAYMENT PHASE CLAIMS
PROVIDER TYPE AMOUNT % AMOUNT % AMOUNT % AMOUNT %
INDEPENDENT PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $3,521,843 32.1 $815,866 7.4 $6,621,211 60.4 $10,958,920 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $47,494,902 71.6 $5,811,585 8.8 $13,038,895 19.7 $66,345,382 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $20,391,375 56.8 $3,792,962 10.6 $11,723,280 32.7 $35,907,616 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $71,408,120 63.1 $10,420,413 9.2 $31,383,385 27.7 $113,211,918 100.0
DISPENSING PHYSICIANS
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $8,481 79.1 $1,042 9.7 $1,196 11.2 $10,719 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $1,885,104 96.5 $40,174 2.1 $28,605 1.5 $1,953,883 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES1 $358,758 90.4 $10,785 2.7 $27,271 6.9 $396,814 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $2,252,344 95.4 $52,001 2.2 $57,071 2.4 $2,361,416 100.0
INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $15,855 24.6 $4,461 6.9 $44,136 68.5 $64,452 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $1,037,572 84.1 $66,615 5.4 $130,000 10.5 $1,234,187 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $256,196 69.9 $23,805 6.5 $86,450 23.6 $366,450 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $1,309,622 78.7 $94,881 5.7 $260,585 15.7 $1,665,089 100.0
CHAIN PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $8,296,730 33.6 $1,759,249 7.1 $14,625,832 59.3 $24,681,812 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $103,378,670 70.7 $12,150,031 8.3 $30,776,417 21.0 $146,305,117 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $44,131,726 61.1 $7,087,838 9.8 $21,034,660 29.1 $72,254,224 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $155,807,126 64.1 $20,997,118 8.6 $66,436,909 27.3 $243,241,153 100.0
NURSING HOME PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $698,315 26.8 $174,683 6.7 $1,736,962 66.6 $2,609,960 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $7,438,849 60.0 $1,625,560 13.1 $3,327,590 26.9 $12,391,998 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $3,243,869 49.7 $824,369 12.6 $2,458,664 37.7 $6,526,903 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $11,381,032 52.9 $2,624,613 12.2 $7,523,217 34.9 $21,528,861 100.0
MAIL ORDER PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $351,354 28.5 $100,348 8.2 $779,737 63.3 $1,231,439 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $12,878,790 79.0 $945,272 5.8 $2,483,508 15.2 $16,307,570 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $3,883,615 84.3 $285,181 6.2 $437,905 9.5 $4,606,701 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $17,113,759 77.3 $1,330,801 6.0 $3,701,150 16.7 $22,145,710 100.0
HOME INFUSION PHARMACIES
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $404 38.8 $0 0.0 $636 61.2 $1,040 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $100,857 97.6 $0 0.0 $2,462 2.4 $103,318 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $13,309 67.6 $0 0.0 $6,378 32.4 $19,687 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $114,569 92.4 $0 0.0 $9,476 7.6 $124,045 100.0
TOTAL (ALL PROVIDERS)
CARDHOLDER EXPENDITURES $12,892,983 32.6 $2,855,649 7.2 $23,809,710 60.2 $39,558,342 100.0
OTHER PAYER EXPENDITURES $174,214,742 71.2 $20,639,237 8.4 $49,787,477 20.4 $244,641,456 100.0
STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES $72,278,847 60.2 $12,024,940 10.0 $35,774,608 29.8 $120,078,395 100.0
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $259,386,572 64.2 $35,519,826 8.8 $109,371,794 27.1 $404,278,192 100.0
SOURCE: PDA/CLAIMS HISTORYNOTE: DATA INCLUDE ORIGINAL, PAID CLAIMS BY DATE OF PAYMENT.
THE OUTSTANDING DEDUCTIBLE AMOUNT AND A COPAYMENT, WHILE PACENET COVERS THE REMAINING COST, IF ANY, OF
THE PRESCRIPTION.
1IN 2015, THE MONTHLY PACENET DEDUCTIBLE WAS CHANGED TO $33.91 TO COINCIDE WITH THE REGIONAL MEDICARE PART D
BRAND BRAND
SINGLE-SOURCE MULTI-SOURCE GENERIC ALL PRODUCTS
BENCHMARK PREMIUM. STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES FOR DEDUCTIBLE CLAIMS ARE ONLY INCURRED FOR TRANSITION
CLAIMS WHICH COMPLETE THE $33.91 MONTHLY DEDUCTIBLE ACCUMULATION. FOR THESE CLAIMS, THE CARDHOLDER PAYS
78
TABLE 6.6AVERAGE CARDHOLDER AND STATE SHARE COST PER PACENET CLAIM
BY PHASE OF COVERAGE, PRODUCT TYPE, AND PROVIDER TYPEJANUARY - DECEMBER 2015
BRAND BRAND BRAND BRANDSINGLE- MULTI- SINGLE- MULTI-SOURCE SOURCE GENERIC TOTAL SOURCE SOURCE GENERIC TOTAL
INDEPENDENT PHARMACIESAVERAGE CARDHOLDER SHARE2 $21.54 $19.49 $6.84 $7.17 $19.64 $19.20 $7.05 $9.44AVERAGE OTHER PAYER SHARE $211.65 $114.04 $4.79 $9.08 $264.84 $136.75 $13.89 $57.17AVERAGE STATE SHARE $0.37 $0.03 $0.00 $0.01 $113.70 $89.25 $12.49 $30.94AVERAGE TOTAL RX COST $233.55 $133.56 $11.63 $16.26 $398.18 $245.20 $33.43 $97.55
DISPENSING PHYSICIANSAVERAGE CARDHOLDER SHARE2 – – $4.28 $4.28 $19.06 $14.88 $8.86 $16.49AVERAGE OTHER PAYER SHARE – – $34.56 $34.56 $4,236.19 $573.92 $211.89 $3,005.97AVERAGE STATE SHARE – – $0.00 $0.00 $806.20 $154.07 $202.01 $610.48AVERAGE TOTAL RX COST – – $38.84 $38.84 $5,061.45 $742.87 $422.75 $3,632.95
INSTITUTIONAL PHARMACIESAVERAGE CARDHOLDER SHARE2 $7.56 $7.24 $6.95 $6.98 $17.01 $12.53 $6.31 $7.78AVERAGE OTHER PAYER SHARE $41.27 $11.88 $3.34 $5.01 $1,113.27 $187.12 $18.59 $149.06AVERAGE STATE SHARE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $274.89 $66.87 $12.36 $44.26AVERAGE TOTAL RX COST $48.82 $19.12 $10.29 $11.99 $1,405.17 $266.52 $37.27 $201.10
CHAIN PHARMACIESAVERAGE CARDHOLDER SHARE2 $24.51 $19.45 $6.62 $7.03 $20.87 $19.69 $7.32 $9.94AVERAGE OTHER PAYER SHARE $223.35 $90.51 $4.87 $9.25 $259.99 $136.00 $15.41 $58.91AVERAGE STATE SHARE $0.24 $0.34 $0.00 $0.01 $110.99 $79.34 $10.53 $29.09AVERAGE TOTAL RX COST $248.11 $110.29 $11.50 $16.28 $391.85 $235.03 $33.27 $97.94
NURSING HOME PHARMACIESAVERAGE CARDHOLDER SHARE2 $17.32 $14.93 $6.34 $6.69 $16.93 $16.71 $6.14 $7.80AVERAGE OTHER PAYER SHARE $179.91 $117.09 $5.80 $11.21 $180.35 $155.54 $11.77 $37.05AVERAGE STATE SHARE $1.59 $2.76 $0.02 $0.08 $78.64 $78.88 $8.69 $19.51AVERAGE TOTAL RX COST $198.82 $134.78 $12.16 $17.98 $275.92 $251.14 $26.60 $64.36
MAIL ORDER PHARMACIESAVERAGE CARDHOLDER SHARE2 $38.43 $36.56 $8.84 $9.68 $33.91 $28.23 $10.58 $14.05AVERAGE OTHER PAYER SHARE $1,777.01 $228.10 $9.90 $49.32 $1,242.89 $265.90 $33.68 $186.06AVERAGE STATE SHARE $12.73 $0.35 $0.00 $0.27 $374.79 $80.22 $5.94 $52.56AVERAGE TOTAL RX COST $1,828.16 $265.00 $18.74 $59.28 $1,651.59 $374.35 $50.20 $252.67
HOME INFUSION PHARMACIESAVERAGE CARDHOLDER SHARE2 $6.60 $11.28 $22.52 $15.73 $15.52 – $16.31 $16.00AVERAGE OTHER PAYER SHARE $1,498.67 $0.00 $46.48 $397.91 $3,879.10 – $63.12 $1,589.51AVERAGE STATE SHARE $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $511.89 – $163.54 $302.88AVERAGE TOTAL RX COST $1,505.27 $11.28 $68.99 $413.63 $4,406.51 – $242.98 $1,908.39
TOTAL (ALL PROVIDERS)AVERAGE CARDHOLDER SHARE2 $22.95 $19.14 $6.68 $7.06 $20.47 $19.52 $7.22 $9.71AVERAGE OTHER PAYER SHARE $225.70 $98.40 $4.94 $9.56 $276.54 $141.11 $15.09 $60.03AVERAGE STATE SHARE $0.50 $0.43 $0.00 $0.02 $114.73 $82.21 $10.84 $29.46AVERAGE TOTAL RX COST $249.15 $117.97 $11.62 $16.64 $411.74 $242.84 $33.15 $99.20
SOURCE: PDA/CLAIMS HISTORYNOTE: DATA INCLUDE ORIGINAL, PAID CLAIMS BY DATE OF PAYMENT.
PAYMENTS IF BRAND IS CHOSEN OVER GENERIC. THE CARDHOLDER SHARE DURING THE COPAYMENT PHASE MAYTHEREFORE EXCEED THE $8 OR $15 COPAYMENT.
DEDUCTIBLE PHASE1 COPAYMENT PHASE
PROVIDER TYPE
2THE CARDHOLDER SHARE INCLUDES THE DEDUCTIBLE PAYMENTS, COPAYMENTS, AND GENERIC DIFFERENTIAL
1IN 2015, THE MONTHLY PACENET DEDUCTIBLE WAS CHANGED TO $33.91 TO COINCIDE WITH THE REGIONAL MEDICARE PART D BENCHMARK PREMIUM. STATE SHARE EXPENDITURES FOR DEDUCTIBLE CLAIMS ARE ONLY INCURRED FOR TRANSITION CLAIMS WHICH COMPLETE THE $33.91 MONTHLY DEDUCTIBLE ACCUMULATION. FOR THESE CLAIMS, THE CARDHOLDER PAYS THE OUTSTANDING DEDUCTIBLE AMOUNT AND A COPAYMENT, WHILE PACENET COVERS THE REMAINING COST, IF ANY, OF THE PRESCRIPTION.
79
80
SECTION 7
THERAPEUTIC CLASS DATA
AND DRUG UTILIZATION
REVIEW DATA
81
82
PA
GE
1
% O
FT
OT
AL
% O
F%
OF
WIT
H A
NY
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
CLA
SS
1C
LAIM
ST
OT
AL
TO
TA
LC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S
AN
TI-
INF
EC
TIV
E A
GE
NT
S
106,
791
3.3
$2,5
72,3
64.4
73.
241
,290
45.2
$62.
30$2
1.66
QU
INO
LON
ES
20,9
700.
6$1
74,5
86.5
10.
213
,939
15.3
$12.
53$1
.47
CE
PH
ALO
SP
OR
INS
14,5
050.
4$6
5,36
8.77
0.1
9,98
810
.9$6
.54
$0.5
5
AN
TIN
EO
PLA
ST
IC A
GE
NT
S
16,4
540.
5$2
,708
,051
.91
3.4
3,08
73.
4$8
77.2
4$2
2.80
AU
TO
NO
MIC
DR
UG
S
129,
848
4.0
$5,7
40,6
99.2
77.
225
,004
27.4
$229
.59
$48.
33A
NT
ICH
OLI
NE
RG
ICS
39,7
911.
2$3
,147
,081
.10
4.0
8,48
29.
3$3
71.0
3$2
6.50
AD
RE
NE
RG
IC A
GE
NT
S32
,450
1.0
$735
,686
.45
0.9
11,0
7212
.1$6
6.45
$6.1
9
BLO
OD
FO
RM
AT
ION
& C
OA
GU
LAT
ION
AG
EN
TS
133,
593
4.1
$4,9
21,2
16.5
56.
220
,501
22.5
$240
.05
$41.
44
CA
RD
IOV
AS
CU
LAR
DR
UG
S
1,04
8,21
332
.5$1
6,52
6,01
7.61
20.8
74,1
8281
.3$2
22.7
8$1
39.1
4C
AR
DIA
C D
RU
GS
684,
016
21.2
$7,4
98,7
87.3
69.
466
,319
72.7
$113
.07
$63.
14A
NG
IOT
EN
SIN
RE
CE
PT
OR
BLO
CK
ER
S10
7,76
53.
3$3
,511
,958
.59
4.4
17,3
5819
.0$2
02.3
3$2
9.57
CA
RD
-H
OLD
ER
SA
NN
UA
L C
OS
T(P
ER
SO
NS
AN
NU
AL
CO
ST
(A
LL
EN
RO
LLE
D)2
TO
TA
L
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
WIT
H C
LAIM
S
IN C
LAS
S)
TA
BL
E 7
.1A
NU
MB
ER
AN
D P
ER
CE
NT
OF
PA
CE
CL
AIM
S,
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S,
AN
D C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
WIT
H C
LA
IMS
BY
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
CL
AS
SJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
AC
E I
NH
IBIT
OR
S12
5,92
43.
9$1
74,7
10.9
30.
222
,608
24.8
$7.7
3$1
.47
CA
RD
IAC
GLY
CO
SID
ES
20,7
180.
6$9
3,59
7.30
0.1
3,35
43.
7$2
7.91
$0.7
9A
NT
IAR
RH
YT
HM
IC A
GE
NT
S11
,828
0.4
$455
,122
.86
0.6
2,22
62.
4$2
04.4
6$3
.83
BE
TA
BLO
CK
ER
S24
3,31
37.
5$1
,424
,017
.81
1.8
38,7
0142
.4$3
6.80
$11.
99C
ALC
IUM
CH
AN
NE
L B
LOC
KE
RS
171,
231
5.3
$1,5
60,1
50.5
72.
027
,744
30.4
$56.
23$1
3.14
LIP
ID-L
OW
ER
ING
AG
EN
TS
287,
955
8.9
$7,2
06,8
84.9
49.
145
,157
49.5
$159
.60
$60.
68H
YP
OT
EN
SIV
E A
GE
NT
S31
,320
1.0
$287
,791
.71
0.4
5,05
95.
5$5
6.89
$2.4
2V
AS
OD
ILA
TIN
G A
GE
NT
S43
,966
1.4
$1,4
74,2
68.6
11.
98,
416
9.2
$175
.17
$12.
41
AN
ALG
ES
ICS
/AN
TIP
YR
ET
ICS
16
1,64
85.
0$3
,543
,495
.03
4.5
33,1
7036
.3$1
06.8
3$2
9.84
NS
AID
S47
,799
1.5
$1,4
44,5
25.1
51.
813
,395
14.7
$107
.84
$12.
16C
OX
-2 I
NH
IBIT
OR
S13
,504
0.4
$868
,272
.16
1.1
2,80
73.
1$3
09.3
2$7
.31
OP
IAT
E A
GO
NIS
TS
111,
229
3.4
$1,8
88,3
71.0
82.
425
,752
28.2
$73.
33$1
5.90
PS
YC
HO
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
AG
EN
TS
17
4,48
45.
4$2
,908
,142
.67
3.7
23,9
5826
.2$1
21.3
9$2
4.49
AN
TID
EP
RE
SS
AN
TS
151,
482
4.7
$1,6
34,4
08.3
42.
122
,692
24.9
$72.
03$1
3.76
SS
RI
AN
TID
EP
RE
SS
AN
TS
86,3
082.
7$4
00,2
74.9
40.
514
,974
16.4
$26.
73$3
.37
AN
TIP
SY
CH
OT
ICS
23,0
020.
7$1
,273
,734
.33
1.6
3,49
73.
8$3
64.2
4$1
0.72
AN
XIO
LYT
ICS
/SE
DA
TIV
ES
/HY
PN
OT
ICS
99
,614
3.1
$618
,683
.91
0.8
18,2
2620
.0$3
3.95
$5.2
1B
EN
ZO
DIA
ZE
PIN
ES
75,3
072.
3$2
87,2
31.4
60.
414
,694
16.1
$19.
55$2
.42
MIS
CE
LLA
NE
OU
S A
NX
/SE
D/H
YP
NO
TIC
S22
,767
0.7
$308
,536
.53
0.4
4,78
15.
2$6
4.53
$2.6
0
83
PA
GE
2
% O
FT
OT
AL
% O
F%
OF
WIT
H A
NY
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
CLA
SS
1C
LAIM
ST
OT
AL
TO
TA
LC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
S
CA
RD
-H
OLD
ER
SA
NN
UA
L C
OS
T(P
ER
SO
NS
AN
NU
AL
CO
ST
(A
LL
EN
RO
LLE
D)2
TO
TA
L
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
WIT
H C
LAIM
S
IN C
LAS
S)
TA
BL
E 7
.1A
NU
MB
ER
AN
D P
ER
CE
NT
OF
PA
CE
CL
AIM
S,
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S,
AN
D C
AR
DH
OL
DE
RS
WIT
H C
LA
IMS
BY
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
CL
AS
SJA
NU
AR
Y -
DE
CE
MB
ER
201
5
RE
PLA
CE
ME
NT
PR
EP
AR
AT
ION
S
52,0
731.
6$3
94,2
62.7
40.
59,
924
10.9
$39.
73$3
.32
DIU
RE
TIC
S
183,
294
5.7
$800
,399
.30
1.0
31,7
7734
.8$2
5.19
$6.7
4LO
OP
DIU
RE
TIC
S10
2,58
33.
2$2
04,4
13.4
20.
319
,861
21.8
$10.
29$1
.72
PO
TA
SS
IUM
-SP
AR
ING
DIU
RE
TIC
S23
,888
0.7
$64,
841.
650.
14,
546
5.0
$14.
26$0
.55
TH
IAZ
IDE
DIU
RE
TIC
S46
,395
1.4
$43,
857.
800.
19,
533
10.4
$4.6
0$0
.37
RE
SP
IRA
TO
RY
TR
AC
T A
GE
NT
S69
,015
2.1
$4,3
14,9
85.7
45.
415
,761
17.3
$273
.78
$36.
33
EY
E,
EA
R,
NO
SE
AN
D T
HR
OA
T P
RE
PA
RA
TIO
NS
109,
726
3.4
$3,8
63,6
50.1
54.
923
,739
26.0
$162
.76
$32.
53
GA
ST
RO
INT
ES
TIN
AL
AG
EN
TS
22
8,17
47.
1$7
,217
,290
.58
9.1
37,7
6141
.4$1
91.1
3$6
0.77
H2-
RE
CE
PT
OR
AN
TA
GO
NIS
TS
24,7
910.
8$4
7,23
5.81
0.1
5,43
86.
0$8
.69
$0.4
0P
RO
TO
N P
UM
P I
NH
IBIT
OR
S16
3,18
15.
1$5
,949
,328
.59
7.5
28,2
4030
.9$2
10.6
7$5
0.09
OT
HE
R M
ISC
ELL
. A
NT
I-U
LCE
R A
GE
NT
S4,
033
0.1
$149
,808
.44
0.2
1,22
61.
3$1
22.1
9$1
.26
HO
RM
ON
ES
AN
D S
YN
TH
ET
IC S
UB
ST
AN
CE
S36
3,07
811
.3$1
0,89
6,93
4.13
13.7
45,5
3149
.9$2
39.3
3$9
1.75
AD
RE
NA
LS A
ND
CO
MB
.33
,404
1.0
$188
,916
.95
0.2
14,1
8615
.5$1
3.32
$1.5
9E
ST
RO
GE
NS
AN
D C
OM
B.
5,83
40.
2$3
66,1
44.5
00.
51,
721
1.9
$212
.75
$3.0
8A
NT
IDIA
BE
TIC
AG
EN
TS
181,
526
5.6
$9,6
96,1
32.7
212
.220
,464
22.4
$473
.81
$81.
64T
HY
RO
ID A
ND
AN
TIT
HY
RO
ID A
GE
NT
S14
1,38
94.
4$5
16,4
76.2
70.
620
,708
22.7
$24.
94$4
.35
SM
OO
TH
MU
SC
LE R
ELA
XA
NT
S
38,7
061.
2$2
,372
,664
.18
3.0
6,68
77.
3$3
54.8
2$1
9.98
TH
EO
PH
YLL
INE
AN
D R
ELA
TE
D D
RU
GS
1,97
20.
1$2
0,65
9.81
0.0
360
0.4
$57.
39$0
.17
33,8
151.
0$1
,215
,439
.69
1.5
6,29
66.
9$1
93.0
5$1
0.23
ALL
OT
HE
R D
RU
GS
278,
599
8.6
$8,9
88,1
20.4
311
.343
,903
48.1
$204
.73
$75.
68
ALL
CLA
SS
ES
CO
MB
INE
D3,
227,
125
100.
0$7
9,60
2,41
8.36
100.
091
,271
100.
0$8
72.1
5$6
70.2
3
1 T
he a
vera
ge a
nnua
l num
ber
of u
niqu
e th
erap
eutic
cla
sses
use
d by
car
dhol
ders
with
one
or
mor
e cl
aim
s in
201
5 w
as 5
.0 (
base
d on
bro
ad t
hera
peut
ic c
ateg
ory)
.2 T
he a
nnua
l cos
t pe
r en
rolle
e is
bas
ed o
n to
tal c
ardh
olde
rs e
nrol
led
in P
AC
E f
or a
ny p
ortio
n of
cal
enda
r ye
ar 2
015
(N=
118,
769)
.
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
AN
D D
RU
G F
ILE
SN
OT
E:
DA
TA
IN
CLU
DE
OR
IGIN
AL,
PA
ID C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E,
EX
CLU
DE
PA
CE
NE
T C
LAIM
S.
DR
UG
S F
OR
OS
TE
OP
OR
OS
IS
84
PA
GE
1
% O
FA
NN
UA
LT
OT
AL
% O
F%
OF
WIT
H A
NY
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
CO
ST
(A
LL
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
CLA
SS
1C
LAIM
ST
OT
AL
TO
TA
LC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SE
NR
OLL
ED
)2
AN
TI-
INF
EC
TIV
E A
GE
NT
S
177,
394
3.7
$3,5
04,0
73.2
52.
966
,525
47.6
$52.
67$1
9.86
QU
INO
LON
ES
34,1
050.
7$2
04,9
40.4
50.
222
,401
16.0
$9.1
5$1
.16
CE
PH
ALO
SP
OR
INS
24,0
830.
5$1
17,6
58.3
50.
116
,516
11.8
$7.1
2$0
.67
AN
TIN
EO
PLA
ST
IC A
GE
NT
S
27,5
130.
6$5
,989
,951
.64
5.0
5,18
73.
7$1
,154
.80
$33.
95
AU
TO
NO
MIC
DR
UG
S
219,
135
4.5
$9,4
03,0
69.9
27.
840
,829
29.2
$230
.30
$53.
29A
NT
ICH
OLI
NE
RG
ICS
66,8
841.
4$5
,572
,480
.37
4.6
13,5
019.
7$4
12.7
5$3
1.58
AD
RE
NE
RG
IC A
GE
NT
S50
,024
1.0
$1,0
95,4
41.4
70.
917
,376
12.4
$63.
04$6
.21
BLO
OD
FO
RM
AT
ION
& C
OA
GU
LAT
ION
AG
EN
TS
214,
410
4.4
$7,4
94,8
65.0
06.
234
,318
24.5
$218
.39
$42.
48
CA
RD
IOV
AS
CU
LAR
DR
UG
S
1,52
2,55
931
.4$2
0,30
9,45
8.52
16.8
113,
723
81.3
$178
.59
$115
.11
CA
RD
IAC
DR
UG
S97
3,25
220
.1$8
,617
,344
.02
7.1
100,
692
72.0
$85.
58$4
8.84
AN
GIO
TE
NS
IN R
EC
EP
TO
R B
LOC
KE
RS
150,
916
3.1
$3,5
33,6
42.4
02.
925
,301
18.1
$139
.66
$20.
03A
CE
INH
IBIT
OR
S17
8,42
43.
7$1
55,7
91.5
00.
135
,196
25.2
$4.4
3$0
.88
CA
RD
IAC
GLY
CO
SID
ES
29,8
300.
6$1
06,0
90.1
30.
15,
122
3.7
$20.
71$0
.60
AN
TIA
RR
HY
TH
MIC
AG
EN
TS
21,4
200.
4$9
94,1
36.4
30.
84,
063
2.9
$244
.68
$5.6
3B
ET
A B
LOC
KE
RS
352,
332
7.3
$1,5
49,1
70.5
31.
360
,402
43.2
$25.
65$8
.78
CA
LCIU
M C
HA
NN
EL
BLO
CK
ER
S23
3,43
64.
8$1
,527
,864
.45
1.3
40,1
3328
.7$3
8.07
$8.6
6LI
PID
-LO
WE
RIN
G A
GE
NT
S43
0,79
68.
9$9
,171
,078
.74
7.6
71,4
0751
.0$1
28.4
3$5
1.98
HY
PO
TE
NS
IVE
AG
EN
TS
50,0
661.
0$3
23,6
55.9
00.
38,
514
6.1
$38.
01$1
.83
VA
SO
DIL
AT
ING
AG
EN
TS
67,1
131.
4$2
,122
,102
.30
1.8
13,8
659.
9$1
53.0
5$1
2.03
AN
ALG
ES
ICS
/AN
TIP
YR
ET
ICS
25
2,32
05.
2$5
,283
,835
.93
4.4
51,6
8736
.9$1
02.2
3$2
9.95
NS
AID
S66
,520
1.4
$1,8
02,8
22.3
61.
519
,771
14.1
$91.
19$1
0.22
CO
X-2
INH
IBIT
OR
S18
,148
0.4
$1,1
25,1
63.5
40.
93,
915
2.8
$287
.40
$6.3
8O
PIA
TE
AG
ON
IST
S18
2,17
33.
8$3
,230
,209
.22
2.7
41,1
2829
.4$7
8.54
$18.
31
PS
YC
HO
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
AG
EN
TS
26
1,07
15.
4$4
,061
,934
.24
3.4
36,9
1926
.4$1
10.0
2$2
3.02
AN
TID
EP
RE
SS
AN
TS
230,
715
4.8
$2,1
02,2
03.9
01.
735
,304
25.2
$59.
55$1
1.91
SS
RI A
NT
IDE
PR
ES
SA
NT
S12
6,95
42.
6$3
74,4
89.8
10.
322
,914
16.4
$16.
34$2
.12
AN
TIP
SY
CH
OT
ICS
30,3
560.
6$1
,959
,730
.34
1.6
4,70
63.
4$4
16.4
3$1
1.11
AN
XIO
LYT
ICS
/SE
DA
TIV
ES
/HY
PN
OT
ICS
14
7,21
63.
0$6
87,5
14.8
80.
627
,701
19.8
$24.
82$3
.90
BE
NZ
OD
IAZ
EP
INE
S11
1,12
92.
3$2
90,7
49.5
70.
222
,432
16.0
$12.
96$1
.65
MIS
CE
LLA
NE
OU
S A
NX
/SE
D/H
YP
NO
TIC
S34
,161
0.7
$384
,143
.38
0.3
7,30
45.
2$5
2.59
$2.1
8
TA
BL
E 7
.1B
NU
MB
ER
AN
D P
ER
CE
NT
OF
PA
CE
NE
T C
LA
IMS
, ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S, A
ND
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
S W
ITH
CL
AIM
SB
Y T
HE
RA
PE
UT
IC C
LA
SS
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
WIT
H C
LAIM
S
IN C
LAS
S)
CA
RD
-H
OLD
ER
SA
NN
UA
L C
OS
T(P
ER
SO
NS
85
PA
GE
2
% O
FA
NN
UA
LT
OT
AL
% O
F%
OF
WIT
H A
NY
PA
RT
ICIP
AT
ING
CO
ST
(A
LL
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
CLA
SS
1C
LAIM
ST
OT
AL
TO
TA
LC
LAIM
SC
AR
DH
OLD
ER
SE
NR
OLL
ED
)2
TA
BL
E 7
.1B
NU
MB
ER
AN
D P
ER
CE
NT
OF
PA
CE
NE
T C
LA
IMS
, ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S, A
ND
CA
RD
HO
LD
ER
S W
ITH
CL
AIM
SB
Y T
HE
RA
PE
UT
IC C
LA
SS
JAN
UA
RY
- D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
015
ST
AT
E S
HA
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
WIT
H C
LAIM
S
IN C
LAS
S)
CA
RD
-H
OLD
ER
SA
NN
UA
L C
OS
T(P
ER
SO
NS
RE
PLA
CE
ME
NT
PR
EP
AR
AT
ION
S
72,6
241.
5$4
24,7
92.6
80.
414
,745
10.5
$28.
81$2
.41
DIU
RE
TIC
S
262,
820
5.4
$851
,453
.82
0.7
48,0
0334
.3$1
7.74
$4.8
3LO
OP
DIU
RE
TIC
S14
8,16
43.
1$2
46,0
83.0
00.
230
,067
21.5
$8.1
8$1
.39
PO
TA
SS
IUM
-SP
AR
ING
DIU
RE
TIC
S36
,262
0.7
$59,
329.
770.
07,
506
5.4
$7.9
0$0
.34
TH
IAZ
IDE
DIU
RE
TIC
S64
,046
1.3
$47,
273.
570.
014
,468
10.3
$3.2
7$0
.27
RE
SP
IRA
TO
RY
TR
AC
T A
GE
NT
S11
1,86
52.
3$8
,140
,175
.09
6.7
25,1
0017
.9$3
24.3
1$4
6.14
EY
E, E
AR
, NO
SE
AN
D T
HR
OA
T P
RE
PA
RA
TIO
NS
15
9,00
83.
3$4
,831
,191
.42
4.0
36,0
2425
.8$1
34.1
1$2
7.38
GA
ST
RO
INT
ES
TIN
AL
AG
EN
TS
31
6,26
76.
5$8
,639
,890
.96
7.2
56,0
1540
.0$1
54.2
4$4
8.97
H2-
RE
CE
PT
OR
AN
TA
GO
NIS
TS
32,8
250.
7$3
7,70
7.24
0.0
7,87
95.
6$4
.79
$0.2
1P
RO
TO
N P
UM
P IN
HIB
ITO
RS
224,
109
4.6
$6,5
84,8
11.7
45.
541
,418
29.6
$158
.98
$37.
32O
TH
ER
MIS
CE
LL. A
NT
I-U
LCE
R A
GE
NT
S6,
313
0.1
$256
,799
.15
0.2
2,01
71.
4$1
27.3
2$1
.46
HO
RM
ON
ES
AN
D S
YN
TH
ET
IC S
UB
ST
AN
CE
S56
9,13
911
.7$2
1,56
8,45
8.72
17.9
72,5
8451
.9$2
97.1
5$1
22.2
4A
DR
EN
ALS
AN
D C
OM
B.
58,3
451.
2$3
19,5
92.8
20.
324
,490
17.5
$13.
05$1
.81
ES
TR
OG
EN
S A
ND
CO
MB
.8,
715
0.2
$518
,633
.64
0.4
2,57
01.
8$2
01.8
0$2
.94
AN
TID
IAB
ET
IC A
GE
NT
S30
9,11
16.
4$2
0,06
0,26
4.81
16.6
34,2
5224
.5$5
85.6
7$1
13.7
0T
HY
RO
ID A
ND
AN
TIT
HY
RO
ID A
GE
NT
S19
1,15
43.
9$4
10,0
20.6
00.
330
,393
21.7
$13.
49$2
.32
SM
OO
TH
MU
SC
LE R
ELA
XA
NT
S
56,0
821.
2$3
,173
,238
.01
2.6
9,91
77.
1$3
19.9
8$1
7.99
TH
EO
PH
YLL
INE
AN
D R
ELA
TE
D D
RU
GS
3,32
00.
1$2
6,08
9.84
0.0
580
0.4
$44.
98$0
.15
DR
UG
S F
OR
OS
TE
OP
OR
OS
IS40
,763
0.8
$1,4
02,2
74.9
21.
28,
227
5.9
$170
.45
$7.9
5
ALL
OT
HE
R D
RU
GS
443,
602
9.1
$14,
862,
900.
4512
.369
,254
49.5
$214
.61
$84.
24
ALL
CLA
SS
ES
CO
MB
INE
D4,
853,
788
100.
0$1
20,6
29,0
79.4
510
0.0
139,
898
100.
0$8
62.2
6$6
83.6
9
1 T
he a
vera
ge a
nnua
l num
ber
of u
niqu
e th
erap
eutic
cla
sses
use
d by
car
dhol
ders
with
one
or
mor
e cl
aim
s in
201
5 w
as 5
.1 (
base
d on
bro
ad th
erap
eutic
cat
egor
y).
2 T
he a
nnua
l cos
t per
enr
olle
e is
bas
ed o
n to
tal c
ardh
olde
rs e
nrol
led
in P
AC
EN
ET
for
any
port
ion
of c
alen
dar
year
201
5 (N
=17
6,43
8).
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CLA
IMS
HIS
TO
RY
AN
D D
RU
G F
ILE
SN
OT
E:
DA
TA
INC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L, P
AID
PA
CE
NE
T C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E.
TO
TA
L C
LAIM
S IN
CLU
DE
DE
DU
CT
IBLE
CLA
IMS
AN
D C
OP
AID
CLA
IMS
.
86
3.4%
4.5%
4.9%
5.4%
6.2%
7.2%
9.1%
9.1%9.
4%
12.2
%
AN
TIN
EO
PLA
ST
IC A
GE
NT
S
AN
ALG
ES
ICS
/AN
TIP
YR
ET
ICS
EY
E, E
AR
, NO
SE
, TH
RO
AT
PR
EP
AR
AT
ION
S
RE
SP
IRA
TO
RY
TR
AC
T A
GE
NT
S
BLO
OD
FO
RM
AT
ION
& C
OA
GU
LAT
ION
AG
EN
TS
AU
TO
NO
MIC
DR
UG
S
LIP
ID-L
OW
ER
ING
AG
EN
TS
GA
ST
RO
INT
ES
TIN
AL
AG
EN
TS
CA
RD
IAC
DR
UG
S
AN
TID
IAB
ET
IC A
GE
NT
S
FIG
UR
E 7
.1
PE
RC
EN
T O
F P
AC
E S
TAT
E S
HA
RE
EX
PE
ND
ITU
RE
S B
Y T
HE
RA
PE
UT
IC C
LA
SS
J
AN
UA
RY
-D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
01
5(T
OTA
L E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
= $
79
,60
2,4
18
)
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
CL
AS
S
15.1
%
0.5%
0.5%0.
6%0.8%1.
0%
1.5%1.6%1.
9%2.1%
3.2%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0
%12
.0%
14.0
%16
.0%
ALL
OT
HE
R D
RU
GS
ES
TR
OG
EN
S &
CO
MB
INA
TIO
N A
GE
NT
S
RE
PLA
CE
ME
NT
PR
EP
AR
AT
ION
S
TH
YR
OID
AG
EN
TS
AN
XIO
LYT
ICS
/SE
DA
TIV
ES
/HY
PN
OT
ICS
DIU
RE
TIC
S
OS
TE
OP
OR
OS
IS T
RE
AT
ME
NT
AN
TIP
SY
CH
OT
ICS
VA
SO
DIL
AT
ING
AG
EN
TS
AN
TID
EP
RE
SS
AN
TS
AN
TI-
INF
EC
TIV
E A
GE
NT
S
SO
UR
CE
: P
DA
/CL
AIM
S H
IST
OR
Y A
ND
DR
UG
FIL
ES
NO
TE
: D
AT
A I
NC
LUD
E O
RIG
INA
L,
PA
ID C
LAIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E,
EX
CLU
DE
PA
CE
NE
T C
LAIM
S.
PE
RC
EN
T O
F E
XP
EN
DIT
UR
ES
87
213
(0.1
%)
691
(0.4
%)
254
(0.2
%)
431
(0.3
%)
586
(0.4
%)
5,01
3 (3
.1%
)
14 (
<0.
1%)
32 (
<0.
1%)
122
(0.1
%)
451
(0.3
%) 2,
008
(1.2
%)
178
(0.1
%)
242
(0.1
%)
426
(0.3
%)
1,05
0 (0
.6%
) 3,
536
(2.2
%)
7,64
0 (4
.7%
)
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
DO
SE
DU
PL
ICA
TE
TH
ER
AP
YM
AX
IMU
M IN
ITIA
L Q
UA
NT
ITY
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
DO
SE
DU
RA
TIO
N O
F T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
DU
PL
ICA
TE
TH
ER
AP
YM
AX
IMU
M IN
ITIA
L D
OS
EM
AX
IMU
M IN
ITIA
L Q
UA
NT
ITY
DR
UG
CO
NT
RA
IND
ICA
TE
D F
OR
GE
ND
ER
INIT
IAL
DR
UG
RE
VIE
WM
AX
IMU
M D
AIL
Y D
OS
ED
UP
LIC
AT
E T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
YM
AX
IMU
M IN
ITIA
L D
OS
E
FIG
UR
E 7
.2N
UM
BE
R A
ND
PE
RC
EN
T O
F P
AC
E A
ND
PA
CE
NE
T C
LA
IMS
WIT
H A
PR
OS
PE
CT
IVE
RE
VIE
W M
ES
SA
GE
BY
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
CL
AS
SJ
AN
UA
RY
-D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
01
5N
= 1
62
,00
9
PA
GE
1
AN
XIO
LY
TIC
S,
SE
DA
TIV
ES
,&
HY
PN
OT
ICS
AN
TI-
SE
IZU
RE
DR
UG
S
AN
TID
EP
RE
SS
AN
TS
AN
TIP
SY
CH
OT
ICS
9 (<
0.1%
)88
(0.
1%)
761
(0.5
%)
66 (
<0.
1%)
69 (
<0.
1%)
83 (
0.1%
) 11
1 (0
.1%
) 36
8 (0
.2%
) 44
1 (0
.3%
)
128
(0.1
%)
601
(0.4
%)
792
(0.5
%)
1,53
5 (0
.9%
) 4,
591
(2.8
%)
15,7
22 (
9.7%
)
567
(0.3
%)
108
(0.1
%)
()
02,
000
4,00
06,
000
8,00
010
,000
12,0
0014
,000
16,0
0018
,000
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
DU
RA
TIO
N O
F T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
Y
DU
RA
TIO
N O
F T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
DO
SE
INIT
IAL
DR
UG
RE
VIE
WM
AX
IMU
M IN
ITIA
L Q
UA
NT
ITY
DU
PL
ICA
TE
TH
ER
AP
Y
DU
PL
ICA
TE
TH
ER
AP
YIN
ITIA
L D
RU
G R
EV
IEW
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
QU
AN
TIT
Y L
IMIT
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
YD
UR
AT
ION
OF
TH
ER
AP
Y
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
Y
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
Y
NU
MB
ER
OF
CL
AIM
SS
OU
RC
E:
PD
A/C
LAIM
S H
IST
OR
Y
NO
TE
S:
BA
SE
D O
N A
TO
TA
L O
F 8
,080
,913
AP
PR
OV
ED
AN
D 2
40,3
30 D
EN
IED
CLA
IMS
.D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
CL
AIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E W
ITH
MU
LT
IPL
E S
UB
MIS
SIO
NS
OF
SA
ME
CLA
IM O
N S
AM
E D
AY
DE
LET
ED
.
AN
TIP
AR
KIN
SO
NIS
M D
RU
GS
MU
SC
LE
RE
LA
XA
NT
S
NS
AID
S &
CO
X-2
INH
IBIT
OR
AN
AL
GE
SIC
S
NA
RC
OT
IC A
NA
LG
ES
ICS
88
67(<
01%
)3,
038
(1.9
%)
3,27
1 (2
.0%
)
232
(0.1
%) 3,40
4 (2
.1%
) 3,
709
(2.3
%)
4,69
8 (2
.9%
)
590
(0.4
%)
5,63
8 (3
.5%
) 6,
854
(4.2
%)
105
(0.1
%)
308
(0.2
%)
762
(0.5
%)
2,66
5 (1
.6%
)
126
(0.1
%)
383
(0.2
%)
11,5
59 (
7.1%
)
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
INIT
IAL
DR
UG
RE
VIE
WM
AX
IMU
M IN
ITIA
L Q
UA
NT
ITY
DU
RA
TIO
N O
F T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
YM
AX
IMU
M D
AIL
Y D
OS
ED
UP
LIC
AT
E T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
YD
UP
LIC
AT
E T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
DO
SE
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
YD
UP
LIC
AT
E T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
YM
AX
IMU
M D
AIL
Y D
OS
EM
AX
IMU
M IN
ITIA
L D
OS
E
FIG
UR
E 7
.2 (
CO
NT
INU
ED
)N
UM
BE
R A
ND
PE
RC
EN
T O
F P
AC
E A
ND
PA
CE
NE
T C
LA
IMS
WIT
H A
PR
OS
PE
CT
IVE
RE
VIE
W M
ES
SA
GE
BY
TH
ER
AP
EU
TIC
CL
AS
SJ
AN
UA
RY
-D
EC
EM
BE
R 2
01
5N
= 1
62
,00
9
PA
GE
2
CH
OL
INE
ST
ER
AS
E IN
HIB
ITO
RS
DIA
BE
TE
ST
RE
AT
ME
NT
GA
ST
RO
INT
ES
TIN
AL
AG
EN
TS
OT
HE
R C
AR
DIO
VA
SC
UL
AR
DR
UG
S
LIP
ID-L
OW
ER
ING
DR
UG
S
671
(0.4
%)
13,6
05 (
8.4%
) 42
,133
(26
.0%
)
41 (
<0.
1%)
42 (
<0.
1%)
58 (
<0.
1%)
78 (
<0.
1%)
301
(0.2
%)
448
(0.3
%)
1,22
8 (0
.8%
) 6,
745
(4.2
%)
10 (
<0.
1%)
468
(0.3
%)
21 (
<0.
1%)
74 (
<0.
1%)
170
(0.1
%)
2,63
4 (1
.6%
)
67 (
<0.
1%)
05,
000
10,0
0015
,000
20,0
0025
,000
30,0
0035
,000
40,0
0045
,000
DR
UG
S IN
AP
PR
OP
RIA
TE
FO
R E
LD
ER
LY
DR
UG
-TO
-DR
UG
INT
ER
AC
TIO
NP
LA
N P
RO
TO
CO
L/O
TH
ER
CA
SE
RE
VIE
W
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
DO
SE
QU
AN
TIT
Y L
IMIT
DU
PL
ICA
TE
TH
ER
AP
YIN
ITIA
L D
RU
G R
EV
IEW
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
DR
UG
CO
NT
RA
IND
ICA
TE
D F
OR
GE
ND
ER
DU
RA
TIO
N O
F T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
Y
INIT
IAL
DR
UG
RE
VIE
WM
AX
IMU
M D
AIL
Y D
OS
E
MA
XIM
UM
INIT
IAL
QU
AN
TIT
YD
UP
LIC
AT
E T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
DU
RA
TIO
N O
F T
HE
RA
PY
MA
XIM
UM
DA
ILY
DO
SE
NU
MB
ER
OF
CL
AIM
SS
OU
RC
E:
PD
A/C
LAIM
S H
IST
OR
Y
NO
TE
S:
BA
SE
D O
N A
TO
TA
L O
F 8
,080
,913
AP
PR
OV
ED
AN
D 2
40,3
30 D
EN
IED
CLA
IMS
.D
AT
A IN
CLU
DE
CL
AIM
S B
Y D
AT
E O
F S
ER
VIC
E W
ITH
MU
LT
IPL
E S
UB
MIS
SIO
NS
OF
SA
ME
CLA
IM O
N S
AM
E D
AY
DE
LET
ED
.
MU
LT
IPL
EC
LA
SS
ES
OT
HE
R S
PE
CIF
IC C
LA
SS
ES
OS
TE
OP
OR
OS
IS T
RE
AT
ME
NT
IMP
OT
EN
CE
TR
EA
TM
EN
T
89
90
SECTION 8
PENNSYLVANIA PATIENT
ASSISTANCE CLEARINGHOUSE
91
92
PENNSYLVANIA PATIENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM CLEARINGHOUSE (PA PAP) In January 2001, the PACE Program began a referral program to assist Pennsylvanians ages 60 through 64 that facilitated contact between the Area Agency on Aging offices and the patient assistance programs offered by pharmaceutical manufacturers. That Program has evolved in recent years, and, as a result, the Program now accepts applications from individual patients, physician offices, social workers and other agencies throughout the Commonwealth. In late 2004, the name of the Program changed to reflect the Program’s current objectives; it became the Pennsylvania Patient Assistance Program Clearinghouse (PA PAP). Eighty of the largest pharmaceutical manufacturers offer limited prescription drug assistance to persons who are not eligible for other forms of pharmaceutical coverage and who cannot afford the cost of one or more of their medications. The PA PAP coordinator provides the expertise necessary to determine the likelihood of eligibility for persons seeking assistance from manufacturers’ medication programs, gathers the patient information required to complete the pharmacy assistance applications, offers guidance and assistance to the patient throughout the application and, if successful, reapplication processes. In 2006, the Clearinghouse extended assistance to all adult Pennsylvania residents who appear to meet the selected guidelines, without regard to age. Pharmaceutical manufacturers which offer pharmacy assistance programs set their income and eligibility guidelines as individual companies; they limit the products and the length of time for assistance. Typically, the gross household income should be at or below 200% of federal poverty level guidelines, but many manufacturers will consider circumstances of hardship that fall outside their usual guidelines. Household income is one factor of many criteria used by the manufacturers to determine eligibility for medication. Manufacturers require a wide range of information on company-specific forms which further complicates the application and review process. A substantial amount of coordination needs to occur between the PA PAP coordinator, the patient, and the patient’s physician. Since the inception of Medicare Part D, some manufacturers have instituted programs to assist cardholders while they are in the Part D coverage gap. The requirements for the Medicare Part D coverage gap programs differ from the base programs offered by the manufacturers. As a result of different settlements from the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s office, the Pennsylvania Patient Assistance Program Clearinghouse has been able to offer assistance for specific medications to patients who are not eligible for the manufacturer’s assistance programs. Eligible patients can receive a 30-day supply of medication for which they are charged varying copayments based on the program they are enrolled in. At the end of 2015, the Clearinghouse successfully enrolled 86 additional patients into these settlement programs. Despite the inherent difficulties of application, the lengthy wait for approval from the manufacturer, and the strictly limited amount of medication granted with each approval, the collaborative efforts of the local and central coordinators responded to inquiries from 29,837 patients after fourteen years of operation. At the end of 2015, 49% (14,515 persons) were receiving medication assistance through the PA PAP Clearinghouse. The Program successfully enrolled persons to the PACE Program (1,295), PACENET Program (3,810), VA benefits (69), or other insurance (249). Among the remaining inactive patients, 65 were over the income limits set by the manufacturers and were not eligible for PACE or PACENET benefits. Among the 14,515 persons receiving assistance through the PA PAP Clearinghouse, a total of 46,298 medications were obtained. Current initiatives are to continue processing manufacturers’ pharmacy assistance applications for cardholders who are uninsured, to assist cardholders with Medicare Part D, to assist Part D-enrolled cardholders in applying for the Low Income Subsidy (LIS) benefit, and to initiate any new Programs that are the result of Attorney General lawsuit settlements.
93
In October 2014, The Clearinghouse expanded its scope to assisting Pennsylvania residents who were paroled from a Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution. This project is a combined effort between the Department of Aging’s Clearinghouse and the Department of Probation and Parole. This effort extended the Clearinghouse beyond its previous scope of assistance. The effort has been able to provide assistance to willing individuals with their medications, transportation services, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), Medical Assistance, enrollment into other state and federally funded programs and other life sustaining benefits. At the end of 2014, the Clearinghouse contacted 3,378 parolees. Of these parolees, 28 were enrolled in one of the Attorney General pharmaceutical settlement programs, 17 in PACE, 28 in SNAP benefits, and 46 in LIS. In addition to the initiatives listed above, Clearinghouse coordinators aided these individuals with finding furniture, physicians, and grants to assist with utility bills. The Clearinghouse plans to expand the current database of information, so that these Pennsylvanians and their family members may be better served with available benefits.
94
APPENDIX A
The PACE Application Center 2015 Report
University of Pennsylvania and PACE/PACENET Behavioral Health Lab Program 2015 Report
The PACE Academic Detailing Program Impact Analysis January 2013 - December 2015
95
The PACE Application Center 2015 Report
Overview Since 2006, the PACE Application Center for the Pennsylvania Department of Aging has conducted data-driven outreach and application assistance to connect older Pennsylvanians with public benefit programs to help cover the cost of prescriptions, shelter and food. The PACE Application Center provides services:
to locate eligible persons and submit PACE applications on their behalf, to enroll persons in the Medicare Part D Extra Help Low-Income Subsidy (LIS), to assist older Pennsylvanians in accessing other benefit programs including the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Property Tax/Rent Rebate (PTRR), Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), Medicare Savings Programs (MSP), and Medicaid coverage.
The PACE Application Center uses multiple sources of state, private and public data to conduct outreach. To date, the Center outreach efforts have resulted in over 204,500 applications for the PACE and PACENET programs, and 145,000 applications for LIS. In addition, the PACE Application Center has submitted over 125,500 additional benefit applications on behalf of Pennsylvania’s seniors. All told, the PACE Application Center has delivered approximately $840 million in benefits to help older Pennsylvanians afford their prescriptions, age in place, and live with dignity.
Outreach and Applications Submitted in 2015 Through mail, telephone and community-based outreach, the PACE Application Center assisted 27,768 senior households in applying for at least one benefit, delivering $99 million in benefits in one year.
2015 OUTREACH AND APPLICATION ASSISTANCE
TOTAL PACE/PACENET OUTREACH 606,527
UNIQUE PACE/PACENET OUTREACH 341,949
TOTAL LIS OUTREACH 113,104
UNIQUE LIS OUTREACH 48,521
PACE/PACENET APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED 11,687
RESPONSES TO PACE AND LIS OUTREACH 29,849
LIS APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED 8,837
SNAP APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED 14,102
PTRR APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED 3,781
LIHEAP APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED 1,572
MSP APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED 3,783
MEDICAID APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED 3,515
HOUSEHOLDS WITH AT LEAST ONE BENEFIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED 27,768
ESTIMATED ANNUAL BENEFIT VALUE $99,007,672
96
Message Testing Results The PACE Application Center successfully reaches eligible seniors who were not yet enrolled in PACE, PACENET, or LIS by outreaching to them about other needs that they may have, such as access to food and to programs that assist with shelter costs. The PACE Application Center has tested outreach messages to previous non-responders which invited seniors to call for assistance to apply for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Property Tax/Rent Rebate (PTRR) Program. Overall, the Center found that using these messages on letters garnered higher response rates than using a prescription assistance message. The Center also found that the SNAP message letter was more effective than the LIS letter in identifying individuals who were eligible for Medicare Part D Extra Help (LIS).
2016 Initiatives For 2016, the Center anticipates conducting new outreach efforts and expanding its messaging about available services. The Center will:
receive 83,900 new, unique names for PACE/PACENET outreach. receive 11,500 new, unique names for LIS outreach. receive and conduct mail and telephone PACE outreach to refreshed lists
provided by PTRR, SNAP, MSP, LIHEAP, the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Medicaid for dual eligible re-deemed status, health insurance companies, commercial mailing list producers, and Pennsylvania Department of Aging.
receive and conduct mail and telephone outreach to refreshed PACE and PACENET enrollees for LIS and for SNAP.
seek additional lists for outreach from health insurance companies who provide Medicare Part D in conjunction with PACE and from valuable partnerships with community-based organizations.
AVAILABLE DATA SOURCES FOR OUTREACH
NEW NAMES AVAILABLE FOR PACE OUTREACH 83,867 NEW NAMES AVAILABLE FOR LIS OUTREACH 11,500 NON-RESPONDER NAMES AVAILABLE FOR PACE OUTREACH 647,000
97
University of Pennsylvania and PACE/PACENET Behavioral Health Lab Program 2015 Report
Overview Depression, anxiety, and dementia are prevalent in later life and lead to significant morbidity and disability, thereby contributing to increased medical services utilization, nursing home utilization, and mortality. Despite advances in the assessment and treatment of behavioral health disorders among older adults, under-treatment of such disorders remains a major public health concern. Less than 20% of patients treated for major depression are seen monthly for the first three months, and they often do not achieve remission. To address these issues, there is a need to improve rates of treatment and to facilitate guideline adherent care for seniors in primary care settings. Much of the focus has been on the delivery of care management strategies either in person or by telephone. One such evidence based, algorithm driven program is SUSTAIN, SUpporting Seniors receiving Treatment And INtervention, conducted through the University of Pennsylvania Behavioral Health Lab (BHL) program. For several years, SUSTAIN has been shown to be effective in identifying community-dwelling older persons at risk of poor health outcomes, including nursing home admissions, and to support these individuals and their caregivers to manage their mental health care. The program is well suited to help reduce or delay the onset and progression of functional limitations, as well as to provide information about and access to community resources that enable independent living for longer periods of time. Assessments PACE enrollees receive evidenced-based care management that includes counseling, support, education and advice about pharmacological treatment as well as referral to available community resources based on needs. SUSTAIN delivers to prescribers written patient monitoring and feedback about medication response, tolerability and safety, and offers telephone consultation to them. Family caregivers may participate in evidenced-based support that focuses on amplifying their caregiving skills through focused problem solving and education offered at their convenience. In 2015, SUSTAIN completed:
634 initial assessments for cardholders and caregivers new to SUSTAIN
5 initial assessments were referrals from the prescribing provider or from the PACE Application Center
98
o These individuals received follow-up care management services with BHL program providers and referrals to specialty mental health services
2,442 follow-up assessments o 240 cardholders received care management services with BHL providers o 289 cardholders received symptom and medication monitoring services o 29 cardholders worked with BHL program providers and received referrals
to specialty mental health services
Locations of SUSTAIN Service Recipients
Note: Smallest map dots are 1-9 persons. The dots increase in size by 10's with 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, and the largest are 50+ persons. 2015 Caregiver Outreach Update In November 2014, CREST, the Caregiver Resources, Education, & SupporT Program, began to deliver caregiver outreach and telehealth education that specifically targets caregivers of cardholders with dementia or Alzheimer’s disease. Caregivers receive care management services in combination with education and support. In 2015, CREST completed:
139 initial assessments with PACE members and/or their caregivers (new to CREST)
o 83 initial assessments with cardholders 79 caregivers were eligible for services and received education and
resource materials 66 of these caregivers worked directly with a BHL provider
for care management and CREST education services
99
13 of these caregivers did not work with a provider but agreed to a 3-month follow-up assessment
4 caregivers were ineligible for follow-up services but received
resource information
o 25 cardholders failed the initial memory screening and did not identify a caregiver or the caregiver chose to not engage in follow-up services
o 31 cardholders completed an initial assessment (passed the memory screening) 9 enrollees were ineligible for services (absence of depression or
anxiety symptoms); they did receive resource materials 22 cardholders were eligible for follow-up services and participated
in either care management services with the BHL provider or medication monitoring, depending on severity of symptoms
100
Overall Outcomes The charts below highlight the differences between monitoring only (standard care) or monitoring with additional therapy and care management (enhanced care). In all cases, care management improves symptoms and function relative to monitoring alone. DEPRESSION SYMPTOMS ANXIETY SYMPTOMS (LOWER IS BETTER) (LOWER IS BETTER)
OVERALL FUNCTIONING (HIGHER IS BETTER)
Initiatives for 2016
CREST Program Starting in April 2015, project managers made minor changes to the sampling procedures to engage a higher percentage of the weekly referrals. Increased caregiver participation in care management and CREST services are expected throughout 2016.
Sampling procedures Starting in May 2016, project managers changed sampling procedures leading to an increase in cardholder referrals per week (up to 60) and made changes to the proportion of referrals from rural and urban counties.
0
5
10
0Month
3 6
PHQ‐9 Score
All Enrollees
Standard Care Enhanced Care
0
2
4
6
0Month
3 6
GAD‐7 Score
All Enrollees
Standard Care Enhanced Care
40
45
50
55
0 3 6
SF12 M
CS Score
Month
All Enrollees
Standard Care Enhanced Care
101
Enhanced partnership with the PACE Application Center The project welcomes referrals. It invites community providers to refer eligible participants to the programs to support their treatment plans through care management services with the Behavioral Health providers. Continued support for cardholders prescribed psychotropic medications The program will continue to enroll cardholders prescribed psychotropic medications into the care management and medication monitoring programs.
Award and Publications in 2015 Bronze Award, 2015 APA Achievement Awards: A Private-Public Partnership to Deliver Population-Level Integrated Care to Low-Income Seniors in Pennsylvania. Joel E. Streim, M.D., SUSTAIN medical director and professor of psychiatry, and David W. Oslin, M.D., SUSTAIN director and professor of psychiatry; SUSTAIN (SUpporting Seniors receiving Treatment And INtervention), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and the Department of Aging, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg. Psychiatric Services 2015; 66:e12–e14; doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.661009. Mavandadi, S, Benson, A, DiFilippo, S, Streim, J, and Oslin, D. (2015). A telephone-based program to provide symptom monitoring alone vs. symptom monitoring plus care management for late-life depression and anxiety: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2157. Hearn, R, Rooney, D, Grecco, E. (2015). Integrating mental health specialty services via telehealth. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apnu.2015.05.008. Maust, D, Chen, S, Benson, A, Mavandadi, S, Streim, J, DiFilippo, S, Snedden, T, and Oslin, D. (2015). Older adults recently started on psychotropic medication: Where are the symptoms? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 30: 580-6. PMID: 25116369. Presentations Mavandadi, S, Benson, A, Foust K, DiFilippo, S, Streim, J, Oslin, D, and Snedden, T. Evaluation of a telephone dementia care management program for caregivers of community-dwelling older adults. Presented at the Sylvan M. Cohen 2015 Annual Retreat, Philadelphia, PA, May 2015. Levine, K, Koenig, A, Leong, S, Benson, A, Streim, J, and Oslin, D. Benzodiazepine prescription patterns for older adults in Pennsylvania. Presented at the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry 2015 Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March 2015.
102
The PACE Academic Detailing Program Impact Analysis January 2013 - December 2015
Overview The PACE Program provides funding and support to the Alosa Foundation for the delivery of an academic detailing service to primary care clinicians who care for PACE beneficiaries. Academic detailing is outreach education for health care professionals to improve clinical decision making. Rather than promote particular products, educators provide comprehensive summaries of the body of evidence for a particular topic to help clinicians prescribe the safest, most effective medications for their patients. The information is compiled from comparative effectiveness research that compares the effectiveness, benefits, and harms of different medical treatment options. This provides a convenient and efficient way for primary care providers to stay current on the latest medical findings about the health issues they most commonly treat. The model uses trained clinical educators who meet one-on-one with physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants at their practice locations to discuss the most recent clinical data on a particular primary care topic. This report reflects activity over three calendar years, between January 2013 and December 2015. During this time, there were nine academic detailing modules covering a wide range of conditions managed by providers in primary care.
THERAPEUTIC AREA MODULE TITLE RELEASED
Heart Failure Managing Risk and Improving Patient Outcomes Nov. 2015
Atrial Fibrillation Anticoagulation: A Key Strategy—Slow(er), Even If Not Steady, Wins the Race Jul. 2015
Urinary Incontinence Evaluating and Managing Urinary Incontinence Mar. 2015
Pain Management Managing Pain in the Elderly Dec. 2014
Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders
Evaluation and Management of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders: Evidence-based Guidance for Primary Care Clinicians
Aug. 2014
Falls and Mobility Preventing Falls In The Elderly: What Primary Care Clinicians Can Do to Reduce Injury and Death Apr. 2014
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease and Smoking Cessation
Helping Patients with COPD Breathe Easier: Integrating the Latest Evidence on Chronic Lung Disease into Primary Care Practice
Nov. 2013
Obesity Weighing the Evidence on Obesity and Its Management Aug. 2013
Type 2 Diabetes Just a Spoonful of Medicine Helps the Sugar Go Down: Improving the Management of Type 2 Diabetes
Apr. 2013
103
Evaluation Both qualitative and quantitative data are helpful to assess the impact of the program on prescribers and to improve the program’s design for the primary care setting.
Clinician participants complete post-visit surveys after each educational session to measure knowledge, as well as to assess how the program impacts prescribing for their older patients.
Alosa conducts drug utilization analyses using PACE claims information. Eight clinical educators record feedback from the participants after each
academic detailing visit, capturing the clinicians’ impressions on the relevance of the current module to their practice and their perceived utility of the module in helping to improve patient care.
Alosa reports the number of prescribers educated on each topic by provider type (physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant).
Post-Visit Surveys Participant surveys began with the obesity module in 2013 and have continued for subsequent topics. For each module, the providers rate topic-specific statements and broader statements on the benefit to their patients. Clinicians strongly agree when asked if they would like to see the program continue and if they receive useful resources to use in caring for their older patients. Below are ratings for two modules.
RATINGS* FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION MODULE (JULY 2015)
Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements. 5 = Strongly Agree; 3 = Neutral; 1 = Strongly Disagree
The PACE academic detailer. . .
PERCENT OF
RESPONDENTS (N=311)
5 4 3 2 1
discussed the benefits of anticoagulation in reducing the risk of stroke, especially in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.
98 2 0 0 0
explained the assessment tools and how I can use them to select therapy. 98 2 0 0 0
presented evidence on the efficacy and safety of the novel oral anticoagulants and how they compare to warfarin.
98 2 0 0 0
the PACE academic detailer provide current, non-commercial, evidence-based information that enables me to improve patient care.
97 3 0 0 0
the PACE academic detailing program has impacted the way I make clinical decisions in caring for my older patients.
90 9 1 0 0
information provided by the PACE academic detailing program benefits the well-being of my patients.
96 4 0 0 0
*Rating results are available for other modules.
Additional comments: Very helpful and concise; excellent presentation; clinical educator does an excellent job and is very clinically astute; useful charts; great information and handouts; great discussion; great representative.
104
RATINGS* FOR URINARY INCONTINENCE MODULE (MARCH 2015)
Please rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following statements. 5 = Strongly Agree; 3 = Neutral; 1 = Strongly Disagree
The PACE academic detailer. . .
PERCENT OF
RESPONDENTS (N=336)
5 4 3 2 1
defined the impact of incontinence on patients’ risks for falls, depression and nursing home admission.
95 4 0 0 0
discussed reversible causes of incontinence, such as medications. 94 6 0 0 0
provided useful resources for patients that I can use in my practice. 96 4 0 0 0
the PACE academic detailer provide current, non-commercial, evidence-based information that enables me to improve patient care.
96 4 0 0 0
the PACE academic detailing program has impacted the way I make clinical decisions in caring for my older patients.
88 11 1 0 0
information provided by the PACE academic detailing program benefits the well-being of my patients.
94 5 0 0 0
*Rating results are available for other modules. Timely Education Heart failure: managing risk and improving patient outcomes launched in November 2015. This module updated clinicians on the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association heart failure stages. The module was very timely, as a medication for reduced ejection fraction heart failure was recently approved. Given the focus on heart failure in quality metrics, namely readmissions, this topic was well received in the field. Clinicians appreciated the patient education, both the patient brochure and the lifestyle tear off.
Qualitative Feedback At the end of each educational session, the academic detailer records specifics on how the messages were received by the prescriber. This provides Alosa with valuable insight on the program, and helps the clinical educator reflect on how they presented the message so that they can engage in continuous quality improvement. Below are comments from clinicians participating in the program, noted by the clinical educators. Feedback on other modules is available from the PACE Program office. Heart Failure: Managing Risk and Improving Patient Outcomes She said that the evidence presented was very informative. She said she had never been exposed to his type of content other than at conferences and felt this is a great program, unlike pharmaceutical representatives. Practitioner liked the update on the new terminology and familiar with the staging as used in EMR; had not been detailed on the new medications and appreciated the detail on the studies and the algorithm for treatment line option of these new agents; has not had any cardiologist prescribe either medication and feels cost is a factor; liked the cost chart and amazed at the difference between brand and generic medications.
105
He does see heart failure patients in his office within seven days after discharge from the hospital. Practitioner will use the patient education tear-off pads; heard of the new drugs but had not used them. He was interested in the cost chart; he finds cost keeps so many patients from being compliant. He appreciates having PACE/PACENET applications and posters with the phone number to call to apply and had them in his office. He looks forward to next topic. Prescriber liked the detail on the new heart failure agents and was not aware there was a new class of agents. Liked the detail in the evidence document; commented the algorithm is helpful for treatment line of new agents; liked the new terminology and staging, as well as, the patient tear-off and weight log. She liked the algorithm and felt it was very easy to follow. She did not know about the two new medications; we talked about their category and where they fit into the algorithm. She liked the tear-offs and felt there is a lot of education when dealing with this disease. She feels compliance is an obstacle when dealing with this disease. Atrial Fibrillation--Anticoagulation: A Key Strategy—Slow(er), Even If Not Steady, Wins the Race She felt the screening tool was very good and was familiar with the CHADs2 scoring but had not heard of the CHADS-VASc scoring. She also admitted she was wary of bleeding and was very interested in the HASBLED screening tool. She felt this was a very helpful module and would consider anticoagulation sooner. Physician Assistant expressed how helpful she finds these visits and reports she used the heart failure materials but lost her packet. I provided her with another copy. We then reviewed the atrial fibrillation (AF) reference card on CHADS-VASc and HASBLED. She expressed again how timely and useful these modules are. She noted that she is more comfortable with prescribing. Prescriber liked topic information. She usually sends her patients to cardiology to have them direct the care, then she will follow them and prescribe as the cardiologist directs. Many of her patients are elderly with complex conditions, so many of them are already going to a specialist of some type. She agrees with the rate control, however, for the rhythm control she does send out. She doesn't want to prescribe these medications as they are too complex. She likes the patient education brochures and has many types on display in her office. She is knowledgeable about disease and management. Warfarin has been working out well for her patients although aware of NOACs, but prefers the warfarin. She said she will read thoroughly and looks forward to next topic/meeting. Visit Metrics The table and map below show the total number of educational visits by the provider types educated and by location. There were 79 practitioners who were new to the program in 2015. As the primary target for the program, physicians continue to represent the majority of prescribers taking part in the program. However, nurse practitioners and physician assistants are visited as well.
EDUCATIONAL VISITS
PRESCRIBER TYPE JUL 2015 -JUN 2016
Physician 1,842Physician Assistant 319Nurse Practitioner 387Total 2,548
106
NUMBER OF UNIQUE PRESCRIBERS VISITED IN 2014 AND 2015
107
APPENDIX B
THE PACE/PACENET MEDICAL EXCEPTION PROCESS BACKGROUND: Act 134-96, the State Lottery Law, requires publication and dissemination of the medical exception process used by the Department of Aging for the Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly (PACE) and for the Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly Needs Enhancement Tier (PACENET). Specifically, the legislation addresses the medical exception process with regard to generic substitution when an A-rated therapeutically equivalent medication is available. The law further requires that the Department of Aging distribute the medical exception process to providers and recipients in the Program. THE MEDICAL EXCEPTION PROCESS: Through the online claims processing system, the PACE/PACENET Program provides prospective therapeutic review of prescriptions before the pharmacist dispenses the medication to the cardholder. The review checks for potential drug interactions, duplicative therapies, over-utilization, under-utilization and other misutilization. The Department of Aging, of course, recognizes the possibility of exceptional circumstances in connection with the application of therapeutic criteria and reimbursement edits. A medical exception will be considered by the Program when the cardholder’s physician indicates the diagnosis, medical rationale, anticipated therapeutic outcomes, the expected length of exception therapy, and the last trial at alternative therapy. Act 134-96 requires a pharmacist to dispense the A-rated, therapeutically equivalent, generic drug to the cardholder if they have a prescription for a multi-source brand product. If a cardholder seeks an exception to this mandate, a pharmacist may request a short term medical exception at the time of dispensing by calling 1-800-835-4080. The PACE Program may grant a 30-day medical exception if requested. Immediately following approval of the exception, the Program sends a follow-up letter to the cardholder’s prescribing physician. This letter serves as notice that the Program granted a temporary medical exception to the mandatory substitution requirement. The letter seeks the therapeutic rationale for continuing the medical exception. The Program allows 30 days for the return of the written medical exception request from the prescriber. If the Program does not receive written documentation, the short term medical exception will expire. If the prescriber does respond to the letter and provides appropriate information, the Program may grant a longer medical exception period. The cardholder may continue to obtain the brand medication without paying the extra cost of a generic differential. The Program may refer a request to a physician consultant or to a therapeutics committee for special review and consideration. The cardholder will receive a short term medical exception until completion of the review process. If the Program denies a request for a medical exception to the mandatory generic requirement, the cardholder may opt to continue using the brand multi-source product and, then, pay the generic differential. If this occurs, the pharmacist must collect the copay for the brand name product plus 70 percent of the average wholesale price of the brand name product from the cardholder. Please direct questions regarding the implementation of the medical exception process to 1-800-835-4080 or in writing to: Mr. Thomas M. Snedden Director, Bureau of Pharmaceutical Assistance Pennsylvania Department of Aging 555 Walnut Street, 5th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101-1919 Source: Pennsylvania Bulletin, Vol. 26, No. 52, December 28, 1996; address change December 8, 1997.
108
APPENDIX C AMERICAN HOSPITAL FORMULARY SERVICE (AHFS) CLASSIFICATIONS
FOR THERAPEUTIC CLASSES USED IN REPORT The American Hospital Formulary Service (AHFS) provides a universal standard of drug classification. Listed below are the AHFS classifications corresponding to the drug classes reported in the tables and figures of this report.
Name of Therapeutic Class AHFS Classification Anti-infective agents 08 Quinolones 08:12.18 Cephalosporins 08:12.06 Antineoplastic agents 10 Autonomic drugs 12 Anticholinergics 12:08 Adrenergic agents 12:12 Blood formation and coagulation agents 20 Cardiovascular drugs 24 Cardiac drugs 24:04 or any below Angiotensin receptor blockers 24:32.08 ACE inhibitors 24:32.04 Cardiac glycosides 24:04.08 Antiarrhythmic agents 24:04.04 Beta blockers 24:24 Calcium channel blockers 24:28 Lipid-lowering agents 24:06 Antihypertensive agents 24:08, 20 Vasodilating agents 24:12 Analgesics/antipyretics 28:08 NSAID's/COX-2 Inhibitors 28:08.04 Opiate agonists 28:08.08 Psychotropic drugs 28:12,16, 20, 24, 28 Anxiolytics, sedatives, hypnotics 28:24 Antidepressants 28:16.04 Antipsychotic agents 28:16.08 Replacement solutions 40:12 Diuretics 40:28, 24:32.20, 52:40.12 Loop diuretics 40:28.08 Thiazide diuretics 40:28.20, 24 Potassium-sparing diuretics 40:28.16, 24:32.20 Respiratory tract agents 48 Eye, ear, nose and throat preparations 52 Gastrointestinal agents 56 H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA's) 56:28.12 Proton pump inhibitors 56:28.36 Miscellaneous anti-ulcer agents 56:28.28, 56:28.32 Hormones and synthetic substances 68 Adrenals and comb. 68:04 Estrogens and comb. 68:16.04 and selected other products Antidiabetic agents (including insulin) 68:20 Thyroid and antithyroid agents 68:36 Drugs for osteoporosis multiple classes (68:16.12, 68:24, 92:24) Theophylline and related smooth muscle relaxants 86:16
SOURCE: AHFS Drug Information
109
APPENDIX D
PACE
PROSPECTIVE DRUG
UTILIZATION REVIEW
CRITERIA
Updated 9/2/2016
110
Therapeutic ClassStarting Page Therapeutic Class
Starting Page
Analgesics 112 Constipation Treatment Agents 133
Anaphylaxis Treatment 115 COX‐2 Inhibitors 133
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors 115 Erectile Dysfunction Agents 133
Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists 116 Estrogen Agonist/Antagonist 134
Antibiotics 116 HCN Channel Blockers 134
Anticonvulsants 116 Histamine H2 Receptor Antagonists 134
Antidepressants 117 Inhaled Corticosteroids 135
Antihyperglycemic Agents 119 Irritable Bowel Agents 135
Antihistamines 121 Kinase Inhibitors 135
Antimetabolites 121 Laxatives 136
Antimigraine Agents 121 Lipid Lowering Agents 137
Anti‐Obesity Agents 122 Lipid Lowering Bile Acid Sequestrants 137
Antiplatelet Agents 123 Lipid Lowering Combinations 137
Antipsychotics 123 Non‐Steroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Agents 138
Arterial Hypertension Treatment Agents 125 Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder Agent 140
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment 125 Oncomycosis Treatment Agents 140
Benzodiazepines and Misc. Sedative/Hypnotics 126 Oral Anticoagulants 140
Beta Blockers 129 Parkinson's Disease Treatment Agents 140
Bisphosphonates 130 Proton Pump Inhibitors/Misc. GI Agents 141
Calcium Channel Blockers 130 Misc. Sedative/Hypnotics (Non‐Benzodiazepine) 142
Calcium Phosphate Binders 131 Skeletal Muscle Relaxants 142
Cardiac Glycosides 131 Smoking Cessation Agents 143
Cholinesterase Inhibitors 131 Vaccines 143
CNS Stimulants 132 Wakefulness Promoting Agents 143
Therapeutic Classes for Prospective Drug Utilization Review
111
MG per day
Date
Begun
MG per day
Date
Begun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Qua
ntity
Date
Begun
Acetaminophen
/
Codeine
Combinations
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 4000 m
g/day
5/13/2002
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Buprenorphine
(Belbuca)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 600 m
cg/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Butalbital and
combinations
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Butorphanol
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Cocaine
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Codeine and
Chlorphen
iram
ine
(Tuzistra XR)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 20 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Codeine and
combinations
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Fentanyl buccal
(Fen
tora)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Tablets greater than
100/m
cg m
ust show
conversion from Actiq
6/3/2009
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Fentanyl Citrate
(Actiq)
6 Units
10/18/2004
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
48 Units in 30
days
10/18/2004
‐‐‐
Fentanyl
Sublingual
(Subsys)
100 m
cg5/6/2013
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
4 doses per day
5/6/2013
‐‐‐
Fentanyl
Transdermal
(Duragesic)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Patches greater than
50 m
cg m
ust show
prior conversion with
opiate.
10/27/2004
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
10 patches in
30 days. Dose
increase will
permit an
additional 10
patches.
10/18/2004
‐‐‐
Analgesics ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Dup
licate
Therap
y an
d Duration
Max Duration
Max Qua
ntity
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)
Initial Qua
ntity
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Plan
Protocol
112
MG per day
Date
Begun
MG per day
Date
Begun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Qua
ntity
Date
Begun
Nalbuphine
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Hydrocodone and
combinations
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Hydrocodone and
Ibuprofen
(Vicoprofen)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 37.5 m
g/day
4/22/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
10 days
out of 30
4/22/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Hydrocodone
extended
release
(Hysingla ER
)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Must have used an
opiate within last 90
days. Also m
ust be
taking opiate 7 days
prior to taking
Hyslinga ER.
8/27/2015
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Hydromorphone
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Levorphanol
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Mep
eridine and
combinations
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Methadone
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Morphine Sulfate
(Kadian, V
arious)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Must show prior
conversion with
opiate before
reim
bursem
ent of 200
mg extended
release
tab.
10/18/2004
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Opium and
combinations
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Analgesics ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)
Initial Qua
ntity
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Plan
Protocol
Max Duration
Max Qua
ntity
Dup
licate
Therap
y an
d Duration
113
MG per day
Date
Begun
MG per day
Date
Begun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Qua
ntity
Date
Begun
Oxycodone/acet
(Xartemis XR)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 4 tabs/day
5/29/2015
No Criteria
‐‐‐
30 days
out of 120
5/29/2015
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Oxycodone
combinations
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Oxycontin
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 320 m
g/day
3/29/2004
No Criteria
‐‐‐
180 days
out of 210
10/18/2004
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Oxymorphone
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
With other
long acting
opiates
Pen
tazocine
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Propoxyphen
e
HCl (Darvon)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 390 m
g/day
5/13/2002
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/22/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Propoxyphen
e
napsylate
(Darvocet)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 600 m
g/day
5/13/2002
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/22/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Tapen
tadol
(Nucynta)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 600 m
g/day
12/14/2010
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
300 m
g daily
if over 75
years of age
12/4/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
400 m
g daily
if under 75
years of age
12/4/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
90 days
out of 120
3/8/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Tram
adol/
acetam
inophen
(Ultracet)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 300 m
g/day
8/20/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
5 days out
of 30
8/20/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Max Qua
ntity
Dup
licate
Therap
y an
d Duration
Tram
adol
(Ultram)
Analgesics ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)
Initial Qua
ntity
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Plan
Protocol
Max Duration
114
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Date Be
gun
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
8/19/2003
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Ben
azep
ril
(Lotensin)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 20 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 80 m
g/day
5/15/1999
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
5/15/1999
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Captopril
(Capoten)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 75 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 450 m
g/day
5/15/1999
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
5/15/1999
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Enalapril
(Vasotec)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 5 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 40 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
10/22/1996
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Fosinopril
(Monopril)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 20 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 80 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
10/22/1996
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Lisinopril
(Prinivil)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 20 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 40 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
10/22/1996
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Moexipril
(Univasc)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 7.5 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 30 m
g/day
1/12/1998
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
1/12/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Perindopril
(Aceon)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 4 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 16 m
g/day
5/13/2002
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
5/13/2002
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Quinapril
(Accupril)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 20 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 80 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
10/22/1996
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Ram
ipril
(Altace)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 5 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 20 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
10/22/1996
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Trandolopril
(Mavik)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 5 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual
to 4 m
g/day
Future 2016
Concurren
t with other
ACE Inhibitors
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Anap
hylaxis T
reatmen
t ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Step
The
rapy
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)
Epinep
hrine Injection
(AUVI‐Q)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Duration of The
rapy
Perio
dReimbursem
ent requires
documen
tation of inability
to use standard Epi‐Pen
.
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yAn
gioten
sin Co
nvertin
g En
zyme Inhibitors ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
115
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Candesartan
(Atacand)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 16 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
32 m
g/day
5/19/1999
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Eprosartan
(Teveten
)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 400 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
800 m
g/day
10/8/2001
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Irbesartan
(Avapro)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 150 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
5/15/1999
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Losartan
(Cozaar)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 50 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
g/day
4/22/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Olm
esartan
(Ben
icar)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 20 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Telm
isartan
(Micardis)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 40 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
10/8/2001
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Valsartan
(Diovan)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 160 m
g/day
8/1/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
320 m
g/day
8/18/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Doxycycline
(Periostat)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
5/13/2002
No Criteria
‐‐‐
9 m
onths out of
every 12
5/13/2002
Rifaxim
in
(Xifaxan)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
3 days out of
every 180
6/3/2009
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Oxcarbazep
ine
extended
release
(Oxtellar XR)
3/22/2015
Peram
panel
(Fycompa)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 2 m
g/day
10/22/2014
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Antib
iotics ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Angioten
sin II Re
ceptor Antagon
ists ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Previous therapy required
with im
med
iate release oxcarbazep
ine (Trileptal)
Anticon
vulsan
ts ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
116
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Amitriptyline
(Elavil)
Less than
or eq
ual to
75 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
250 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Amoxapine
(Asendin)
Less than
or eq
ual to
75 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Bupropion
(Aplenzin)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
348 m
g/day
12/14/2010
Bupropion
(Wellbutrin)
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
450 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Bupropion
(Wellbutrin XL)
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
2/6/1997
Less than
or eq
ual to
400 m
g/day
1/16/1995
2/6/1997
‐‐‐
Citalopram
(Celexa)
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
5/15/1999
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
5/15/1999
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Clomipramine
(Anafranil)
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
250 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Desipramine
(Norpramin)
Less than
or eq
ual to
75 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
250 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Desvenlafaxine
(Pristiq)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
12/14/2010
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Doxepin
(Sineq
uan)
Less than
or eq
ual to
75 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
250 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Duloxetine
(Cym
balta)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
2/11/2008
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Escitalopram
(Lexapro)
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Fluoxetine
(Prozac)
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Fluoxetine
(Prozac weekly)
Imipramine
(Tofranil)
Less than
or eq
ual to
75 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
250 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Antid
epressan
ts (SSR
I and
SSN
RI) ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Prior to Prozac weekly being approved, 90 days of therapy with Prozac daily is req
uired
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Step
Therapy Req
uires use of bupropion
tablets (not T12 or T24) prior to
reim
bursem
ent
117
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Isocarboxazid
(Marplan)
Less than
or eq
ual to
30 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Maprotiline
(Ludiomil)
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Milnacipran
(Savella)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
12/14/2010
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Mirtazapine
(Rem
eron)
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
8/18/1997
Less than
or eq
ual to
45 m
g/day
8/18/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Nefazodone
(Serzone)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
600 m
g/day
8/28/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Nortriptyline
(Pam
elor)
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
150 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Paroxetine
(Paxil)
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Paroxetine
(Paxil CR)
Less than
or eq
ual to
12.5 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Phen
elzine
(Nardil)
Less than
or eq
ual to
45 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
90 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Protriptyline
(Vivactil)
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Sertraline
(Zoloft)
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Tranylcypromine
(Parnate)
Less than
or eq
ual to
30 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Trazodone
(Desyrel)
Less than
or eq
ual to
150 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
400 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Trim
ipramine
(Surm
ontil)
Less than
or eq
ual to
75 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
250 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Ven
lafaxine
(Effexor)
Less than
or eq
ual to
75 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
225 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Vortioxetine
(Brintellex)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Antid
epressan
ts (SSR
I and
SSN
RI) ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
118
MG per day
Date
Begun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate
Begun
All agen
ts excep
t insulin
Acarbose
(Precose)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 25 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
4/10/2000
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Alogliptin
(Nesina)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
25 m
g/day
Future 2016
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Alogliptin/m
etform
in
(Kazano)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
25/2000 m
g/day
Future 2016
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Alogliptin/pioglitazone
(Oseni)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
25/45 m
g/day
Future 2016
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Dapagliflozen
(Farxiga)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 5 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
Future 2016
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
dapaglifozen and m
etform
in
extended
release
(Xigduo‐XR)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
1 tablet/day
8/27/2015
Step
therapy with dapagliflozin
or metform
in1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Dulaglutide
(Trulicity)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
0.5ml/week
8/27/2015
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Empagliflozin and linagliptin
(Glyxambi)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Step
therapy with empagliflozin
or linagliptin
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Exen
atide extended
release
(Bydureon)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
2 m
g/week
Future 2016
Previous trial w
ith Byetta
required
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Glim
epiride
(Amaryl)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 2 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
8 m
g/day
Future 2016
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Glipizide
(Glucotrol)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 5 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
Future 2016
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Glyburide
(Diabeta)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 5 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
Future 2016
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Glyburide/metform
in
(Glucovance)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/2000 m
g/day
10/8/2001
‐‐‐
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Human
Insulin
(Afrezza)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
24 units/day
Overlap
in therapy when
taken
concurren
tly with a drug to treat
asthma/COPD/smoking cessation
Antih
yperglycem
ic Agents ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
For new
therapy starts: Trial with m
etform
in or a metform
in combination product req
uired
in the last 365 days.
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Step
The
rap y
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
119
MG per day
Date
Begun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Linagliptin
(Tradjenta)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
Future 2016
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Metform
in
(Glucophage)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 1000 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
2550 m
g/day
4/10/2000
‐‐‐
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Metform
in/canagliflozin
(Invokamet)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Step
therapy with m
etform
in
and canagliflozin
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Metform
in/empagliflozin
(Synjardy)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Miglitol
(Glyset)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 75 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
4/10/2000
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Nateglinide
(Starlix)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
360 m
g/day
10/8/2001
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Pioglitazone
(Actos)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 30 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
45 m
g/day
10/8/2001
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Pioglitazone/glim
epride
(Duetact)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 30/2 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
30/4 m
g/day
6/2/2009
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Rep
aglinide
(Prandin)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 6 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
16 m
g/day
4/10/2000
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Rosiglitazone
(Avandia)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 4 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
8 m
g/day
4/10/2000
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
'No Criteria
‐‐‐
Rosiglitazone and combinations
(Avandia, A
vandam
et,
Ad
lL
i)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Rosaglitazone/glim
epiride
(Avandaryl)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 4/1 m
g/day
6/20/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
8/4 m
g/day
Future 2016
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Rosiglitazone/metform
in
(Avandam
et)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
8/2000 m
g/day
Future 2016
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Sagliptin
(Onglyza)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
12/14/2010
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Sitagliptin
(Januvia)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
g/day
7/5/2016
Trial w
ith m
etform
in req
uired
in
the last 365 days
1/4/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Antih
yperglycem
ic Agents ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Step
The
rap y
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
120
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Cetirizine
(Zyrtec, Zyrtec‐D)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antihistamines
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Desloratadine
(Clarinex, Clarinex‐D)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antihistamines
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Fexofenadine
(Allegra, Allegra‐D)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
120 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antihistamines
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Fexofenadine
(Allegra, 180 m
g
strength tablet)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
180 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antihistamines
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Date Be
gun
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
6/8/2015
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Alm
atriptan
(Axert)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
25 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antimigraines
8/19/2003
4 days out of
every 30
3/13/2000
Dihydroergotamine
(Migranal)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
2 bottles daily
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antimigraines
8/19/2003
4 days out of
every 30
3/13/2000
Eletriptan
(Relpax)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
3/29/2004
Concurren
t with other
antimigraines
8/19/2003
3 days out of
every 30
3/13/2000
Frovatriptan
(Frova)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
7.5 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antimigraines
8/19/2003
4 days out of
every 30
3/13/2000
Methysergide maleate
(Sansert)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
8 m
g/daily
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antimigraines
8/19/2003
150 days out of
every 180
3/13/2000
Naratriptan
(Amerge)
3/13/2000
Rizatriptan
(Maxalt, M
axalt MLT)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
30 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antimigraines
8/19/2003
4 days out of
every 30
3/13/2000
Sumitriptan and naproxen
(Treximet)
3/13/2000
Zolm
itriptan
(Zomig, ZMT)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
8/19/2003
Concurren
t with other
antimigraines
8/19/2003
3 days out of
every 30
3/13/2000
Antim
etab
olite
s ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Antih
istamines ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Perio
dMust try oral m
ethotrexate
prior to reimbursem
ent of
Rasuvo
or Otrexup
Sub Q M
ethotrexate
(Rasuvo, O
trexup)
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Step
The
rapy
Not Recommen
ded
for the Elderly
Not indicated
in the elderly
Antim
igraine Ag
ents ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
121
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Bupropion/N
altrexone
(Contrave)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Documen
t at least 5%
weight loss after
12 weeks
2/2/2015
Concurren
t with other
weight loss agents
Future 2016
Diethylpropion
(Ten
uate)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or
equal to 100
mg/day
7/26/1999
60 days out of
every 120
8/9/1999
Concurren
t with other
weight loss agents
Future 2016
Lorcaserin HCL
(Belviq)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Documen
t at least 5%
weight loss after
12 weeks
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
weight loss agents
Future 2016
Orlistat
(Xen
ical)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or
equal to 360
mg/day
7/26/1999
60 days out of
every 90
8/9/1999
Concurren
t with other
weight loss agents
Future 2016
Phen
dim
etrazine
(Bontril)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or
equal to 105
mg/day
7/26/1999
60 days out of
every 120
8/9/1999
Concurren
t with other
weight loss agents
Future 2016
Phen
term
ine HCL
(Adipex‐P)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or
equal to 37.5
mg/day
7/26/1999
60 days out of
every 120
8/9/1999
Concurren
t with other
weight loss agents
Future 2016
Phen
term
ine HCL
(Suprenza)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Documen
t at least 5%
weight loss after
12 weeks
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
weight loss agents
Future 2016
Phen
term
ine/To
piram
ate
(Qsymia)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
8/28/2013
Concurren
t with other
weight loss agents
Future 2016
Sibutram
ine
(Meridia)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or
equal to 30
mg/day
7/26/1999
60 days out of
every 90
8/9/1999
Concurren
t with other
weight loss agents
Future 2016
Anti‐Obe
sity Agents ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Duration of The
rapy
Refer to m
anufacturer recommen
dations for dose
titration as well as weight loss related
to use at each
dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yMaxim
um In
itial Dose
122
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Aspirin/dipyridam
ole
(Aggrenox)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/400 m
g/day
10/8/2001
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Cilostazol
(Pletal)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
4/10/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Clopidogrel bisulfate
(Plavix)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
75 m
g/day
10/8/2001
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Dipyridam
ole
(Persantine)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
400 m
g/day
concurren
t with
warfarin
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Prasugrel
(Effient)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Ticagrelor
(Brilinta)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
180 m
g/day for 1 year
then
120 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Ticlopidine
(Ticlid)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
500 m
g/day
5/15/1999
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Vorapaxar
(Zontivity)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
2.08 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Aripiprazole
(Abilify)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Aripiprazole, Ext. Release
Injectible
(Abilify M
aintena)
5/13/2013
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Cariprazine
(Vraylar)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
6 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Chlorpromazine
(Thorazine)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 50 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Clozapine
(Clozaril)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 25 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
g/day
8/18/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Reimbursem
ent required
documen
tation of inability to use Abilify.
Antip
sychotics ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Antip
latelet A
gents ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
123
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Fluphen
azine
(Prolixin)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 1 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Haloperidol
(Haldol)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 1 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Loxapine
(Loxitane)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 20 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Mesoridazine
(Seren
til)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 30 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
125 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Olanzapine
(Zyprexa)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 2.5 m
g/day
8/18/1997
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
8/18/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Paliperidone
(Invega)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
12 m
g/day
6/2/2009
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Paliperidone palmitate
(Invega Trinza)
11/16/2015
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Perphen
azine
(Trilafon)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 8 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
24 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Quetiapine
(Seroquel)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 50 m
g/day
4/22/1998
Less than
or eq
ual to
400 m
g/day
4/22/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Risperidone
(Risperdal & Risperdal‐M
)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 0.5 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
6 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Thioridazine
(Mellaril)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 50 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Thiothixen
e
(Navane)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 4 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Trifluoperazine
(Stelazine)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 2 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Ziprasidone
(Geo
don)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
160 m
g per day Oral
40 m
g/day IM
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Duration of The
rapy
Antip
sychotics ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
Must use Invega Susten
na for 4 m
onths prior to Invega Trinza being approved.
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
124
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Ambrisentan
(Letairis)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
agen
ts used to treat
pulm
onary arterial
10/14/2014
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Bosentan
(Tracleer)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
agen
ts used to treat
pulm
onary arterial
10/14/2014
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Epoprosten
ol
(Veletri/flolan)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
agen
ts used to treat
pulm
onary arterial
10/14/2014
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Iloprost
(Ven
tavis)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
agen
ts used to treat
pulm
onary arterial
10/14/2014
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Maciten
tan
(Opsumit)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
agen
ts used to treat
pulm
onary arterial
10/14/2014
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Riociguat
(Adem
pas)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
agen
ts used to treat
pulm
onary arterial
10/14/2014
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Selexipag
(Uptravi)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Max dose is
3200 m
cg/day
7/5/2016
Concurren
t with other
agen
ts used to treat
pulm
onary arterial
12/28/2015
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Silden
afil
(Revatio)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
agen
ts used to treat
pulm
onary arterial
10/14/2014
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Tadalafil
(Adcirca)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t with other
agen
ts used to treat
pulm
onary arterial
10/14/2014
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Male/Female
Date Be
gun
Alfuzosin
(Uroxatral)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Male
2/22/2007
Doxazosin
(Cardura)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Male
2/22/2007
Agen
ts to
Treat Arterial H
ypertension ‐ C
riteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Agen
ts to
Treat Ben
ign Prostatic
Hyperplasia ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yGen
der E
dit
125
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date
Begun
Male/Female
Date Be
gun
Dutasteride
(Avodart)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
0.5 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Male
2/22/2007
Finasteride
(Proscar)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Male
2/22/2007
Silodosin
(Rapaflo)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Male
11/5/2009
Tamsulosin HCI
(Flomax)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
0.8 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Male
1/4/2007
Dutasteride/
Tamsulosin
(Jalyn)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Male
4/21/2012
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Alprazolam
(Xanax)
Less than
or eq
ual to
0.75 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
3 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Alprazolam
(Xanax XR)
Less than
or eq
ual to
0.5 m
g/day
3/29/2004
Less than
or eq
ual to
6 m
g/day
3/29/2004
No Criteria
Chlordiazepoxide
(Librium)
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Clonazep
am
(Klonopin)
Less than
or eq
ual to
1 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
4 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Only for Panic Disorder
Benzod
iazepine
s ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Agen
ts to
Treat Ben
ign Prostatic
Hyperplasia ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yGen
der E
dit
126
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Clorazepate
(Tranxene)
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Diazepam
(Valium)
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Halazep
am
(Paxipam
)
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Lorazepam
(Ativan)
Less than
or eq
ual to
2 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
6 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Oxazepam
(Serax)
Less than
or eq
ual to
30 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Class
Date Be
gun
Estazolam
(Prosom)
Less than
or eq
ual to
1 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
2 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Eszopiclone
(Lunesta)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
2 m
g/day
2/19/2007
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
10/25/2005
Flurazepam
(Dalmane)
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
30 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Benzod
iazepine
s/Miscellane
ous S
edative/Hypno
tics ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Duration of The
rapy
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Benzod
iazepine
s ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
127
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Class
Date Be
gun
Quazep
am
(Doral)
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
1/16/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Ram
elteon
(Rozerem)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
8 m
g/day
2/19/2007
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
10/25/2005
Temazep
am
(Restoril)
Less than
or eq
ual to
7.5 m
g/day
3/1/1994
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
3/1/1994
240 m
g/6 m
os
3/1/1994
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Triazolam
(Halcion)
Less than
or eq
ual to
.125 m
g/day
1/31/1992
Less than
or eq
ual to
.25 m
g/day
1/31/1992
4 m
g/6 m
os
1/31/1992
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
3/13/2000
Zolpidem
(Ambien)
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
1/16/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
10/25/2005
Zolpidem
(Ambien CR)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
6.25 m
g/day
11/1/2005
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
10/25/2005
Zolpidem
(Edluar)
12/14/2010
Zolpidem
(Interm
ezzo)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
1.75 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
10/25/2005
Zaleplon
(Sonata)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
2/19/2007
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t
Ben
zodiazepines and
Misc Sed/Hypnotics
10/25/2005
Step
Therapy Documen
tation req
uired
as to need for sublingual dosage form
Benzod
iazepine
s/Miscellane
ous S
edative/Hypno
tics ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Duration of The
rapy
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
128
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Acebutolol
(Sectral)
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
1200 m
g/day
5/15/1999
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
12/9/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Atenolol
(Ten
orm
in)
Less than
or eq
ual to
25 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Betaxolol
(Kerlone)
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Bisoprolol
(Zeb
eta)
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Carteolol
(Cartrol)
Less than
or eq
ual to
2.5 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Carvedilol
(Coreg)
Less than
or eq
ual to
12.5 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
g/day
8/18/1997
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
8/18/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Carvedilol
(Coreg CR)
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
7/5/2016
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Labetalol
(Norm
odyne)
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
2400 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Metoprolol
(Lopressor)
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
450 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Metoprolol
(Toprol XL)
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
400 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Nadolol
(Corgard)
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
320 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Pen
butolol
(Levatol)
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Pindolol
(Visken)
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Propranolol
(Inderal)
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
640 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Propranolol
extended
release Le
ss than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
120 m
g/day
3/29/2004
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
3/29/2004
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Propranolol LA
(Inderal LA)
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
640 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Sotalol
(Betapace)
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
320 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Timolol
(Blocadren)
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with other
Beta Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Beta Blockers ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
129
MG per day
Date
Begun
MG per day
Date
Begun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Alendronate
(Fosamax)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
8/19/2003
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Rised
ronate
(Actonel)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
3/29/2004
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Teriparatide
(Forteo
)No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
3/29/2004
No Criteria
‐‐‐
24 M
onths
12/14/2010
MG per day
Date
Begun
MG per day
Date
Begun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Amlodipine
(Norvasc)
Less than
or eq
ual to
2.5 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
12/9/1995
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
12/9/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Amlodipine & Atorvastatin
(Caduet)
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day (based
on
Atorvastatin)
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day (based
on
Atorvastatin)
2/14/2005
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
2/14/2005
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Bep
ridil
(Vascor)
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
400 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Diltiazem
(Cardizem
)
Less than
or eq
ual to
180 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
360 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Diltiazem CD
(Cardizem
CD)
Less than
or eq
ual to
180 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
540 m
g/day
5/15/1999
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
5/15/1999
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Felodipine
(Plendil)
Less than
or eq
ual to
2.5 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Isradipine
(DynaCirc)
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Nicardipine
(Carden
e)
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
120 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Nifed
ipine
(Procardia)
Less than
or eq
ual to
30 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
120 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Nisoldipine
(Sular)
Less than
or eq
ual to
17 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
34 m
g/day
8/18/1997
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
8/18/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Verapam
il
(Calan, Isoptin)
Less than
or eq
ual to
240 m
g/day
8/8/2016
Less than
or eq
ual to
480 m
g/day
10/18/1995
Concurren
t with Other Calcium
Channel Blockers
10/18/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Bispho
spho
nates a
nd Recom
bina
nt Hum
an Parathyroid Hormon
e An
alog
‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Calcium Cha
nnel Blockers ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
130
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Sevelamer
Carbonate
(Ren
vela)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
7200 m
g/day
4/21/2008
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Maxim
um In
itial
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Digoxin
(Lanoxin)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
0.125 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Donep
ezil
(Aricept)
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g per day
5/15/1999
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
5/15/1999
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Galantamine
(Rem
inyl)
Less than
or eq
ual to
8 m
g per day
5/13/2002
Less than
or eq
ual to
24 m
g/day
5/13/2002
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Mem
antine
(Nam
enda)
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g per day
2/14/2005
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
2/14/2005
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Mem
antine
(Nam
enda XR)
Less than
or eq
ual to
7 m
g per day
3/2/2015
Less than
or eq
ual to
28 m
g/day
3/2/2015
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Rivastigm
ine
(Exelon)
Less than
or eq
ual to
3 m
g per day
5/13/2002
Less than
or eq
ual to
12 m
g/day
5/13/2002
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐‐
No Criteria
3/2/2015
Less than
or eq
ual to
4.6 m
g/24 hour for patch
3/2/2015
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
3/2/2015
Less than
or eq
ual to
9.5 m
g/24 hour for patch
3/2/2015
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
3/2/2015
Less than
or eq
ual to
13.3 m
g/24 hour for patch
3/2/2015
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Duration of The
rapy
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)
Rivastigm
ine
(Exelon Patch)
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Calcium Pho
spha
te Binde
rs ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Cardiac Glycoside
s ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Cholinesterase In
hibitors ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Duration of The
rapy
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Initial Qua
ntity
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate The
rapy
131
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Amphetam
ine
dextroam
phetam
ine mixed
salts
(Adderall)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Amphetam
ine
dextroam
phetam
ine mixed
salts
(Adderall XR)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Amphetam
ine sulfate
(Evekeo)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Atomoxetine
(Strattera)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Dexmethylphen
idate hcl
(Focalin
XR)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐‐
Dextroam
phetam
ine
(Dexed
rine)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐‐
Dextroam
phetam
ine sulfate
(Zen
zedi)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Lisdexam
fetamine dim
esylate
(Vyvanse)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
70 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐‐
Metam
phetam
ine hcl
(Desoxyn)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Methylphen
idate hcl
(Methylin)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐‐
Methylphen
idate hcl
(Ritalin SR)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Methylphen
adate hcl exten
ded
release (M
etadate ER
)No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Methylphen
idate hcl exten
ded
release (M
ethylin ER)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Methylphen
idate hcl exten
ded
release (Quillichew
ER)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Methylphen
idate hcl exten
ded
release (Quillivant XR)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
CNS Stim
ulan
ts ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
132
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Lubiprostone
(Amitiza)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
25 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Methylnaltrexone bromide
(Relistor)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
48 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Naloxegol
(Movantik)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
12 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Celecoxib
(Celeb
rex)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
400 m
g/day
4/10/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Curren
t
NSA
IDS
4/10/2000
Valdecoxib
(Bextra)
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date
Begun
Male/
Female
Date Be
gun
Alprostadil
(Caverject)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
8 days out of
every 30
2/11/2008
Concurren
t with
other erectile
dysfunction agents
5/7/2004
Male
2/11/2008
Silden
afil Citrate
(Viagra)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 50 m
g/day
6/1/1998
8 days out of
every 30
10/18/2004
Concurren
t with
other erectile
dysfunction agents
5/7/2004
Male
10/18/2004
Tadalafil
(Cialis)
Less than
or eq
ual
to 20 m
g/day
3/15/2004
8 days out of
every 30
10/18/2004
Concurren
t with
other erectile
dysfunction agents
4/29/2008
Male
10/18/2004
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Maxim
um Duration
Agen
ts to
Treat Con
stipation (Both Ch
ronic an
d Opioid Indu
ced) ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Maxim
um Duration
Dup
licate Th
erap
yGen
der E
dit
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Dup
licate Th
erap
yMaxim
um In
itial Dose
COX‐2 Inhibitors ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Erectile Dysfunctio
n Ag
ents ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Maxim
um Duration
Rem
oved from M
arket
133
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Ospem
ifen
e
(Osphen
a)No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t use with
other estrogen products
or SERM class agents
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Ivabradine
(Colanor)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 15 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Perio
dDate
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Cim
etidine
Maintenance Therapy
(Tagam
et)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
8/16/1992
Less than
or eq
ual to
1600 m
g/day
Unlim
ited
10/8/2004
Proton Pump
Inhibitors and
Concurren
t H2
8/16/1992
Famotidine
Maintenance Therapy
(Pep
cid)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
8/16/1992
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
Unlim
ited
10/8/2004
Proton Pump
Inhibitors and
Concurren
t H2
8/16/1992
Nizatidine
Maintenance Therapy
(Axid)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
8/16/1992
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
Unlim
ited
10/8/2004
Proton Pump
Inhibitors and
Concurren
t H2
8/16/1992
Ranitidine
Maintenance Therapy
(Zantac)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
8/16/1992
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
Unlim
ited
10/8/2004
Proton Pump
Inhibitors and
Concurren
t H2
8/16/1992
Histamine H2 R
ecep
tor A
ntagon
ists ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Estrogen
Agonist/A
ntagon
ist ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
eGen
eric (B
rand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
HCN
Cha
nnel Blockers ‐ C
riteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
eGen
eric (B
rand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Drug Nam
eGen
eric (B
rand
)
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Duration of The
rapy
Dup
licate Th
erap
yMaxim
um In
itial Dose
134
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Budesonide
(Pulm
icort‐Respules)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
1 m
g/day
6/3/2009
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Alosetron
(Lotronex)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
2 m
g/day
Future 2016
Female Only
10/18/2004
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Afatinib
(Gilotrif)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Axitinib
(Inlyta)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Bosutinib
(Bosulif)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
600 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Cabozantinib
(Cometriq)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
1800 m
g/day
10/14/2013
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Crizotinib
(Xalkori)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
500 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Dasatinib
(Sprycel)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
180 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Erlotinib
(Tarceva)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
150 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Gefitinib
(Iressa)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
250 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Imatinib
(Gleevec)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
800 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Lapatinib
(Tykerb)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
1500 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Inha
led Co
rticosteroids ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Irrita
ble Bo
wel Agents ‐ C
riteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Gen
der E
dit
Kina
se In
hibitors ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
135
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Nilotinib
(Tasigna)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
800 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Nintedanib
(Ofev)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
30 m
g/day
8/29/2015
Concurren
t with
Esbriet
8/27/2015
Pazopanib
(Votrient)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
800 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Pirfenidone
(Esbriet)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
9 capsules per/day
8/29/2015
Concurren
t with
Ofev
8/27/2015
Ponatinib
(Iclusig)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
45 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Regrorafenib
(Stivarga)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
160 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Ruxolitinib
(Jakafi)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Sunitinib
(Sutent)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Tofacitinib
(Xeljanz)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Tofacitinib
(Xeljanz XR)
Less than
or eq
ual to
11 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Vandetanib
(Capresla)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Vem
urafenib
(Zelboraf)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
1920 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Sodium picosulfate,
magnesium oxide and
anhydrous citric acid
(Prepopik)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Xeljanz must be tried prior to using
Laxativ
es ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Kina
se In
hibitors ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
136
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Atorvastatin
(Lipitor)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
12/4/1997
Concurren
t HMG‐Co A
Red
uctase Inhibitors
12/4/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Ezetim
ibe
(Zetia)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
3/29/2004
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Fluvastatin
(Lescol)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
4/15/1997
Concurren
t HMG‐Co A
Red
uctase Inhibitors
4/15/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Lovastatin
(Mevacor)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
4/15/1997
Concurren
t HMG‐Co A
Red
uctase Inhibitors
4/15/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Pravastatin
(Pravachol)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
4/15/1997
Concurren
t HMG‐Co A
Red
uctase Inhibitors
4/15/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Rosuvastatin
(Crestor)
Less than
or
equal to 5 m
g2/14/2005
Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
2/14/2005
Concurren
t HMG‐Co A
Red
uctase Inhibitors
2/14/2005
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Simvastatin
(Zocor)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
80 m
g/day
5/15/1999
Concurren
t HMG‐Co A
Red
uctase Inhibitors
4/15/1997
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Cholestyram
ine
(Prevalite)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
4 packets/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Cholestyram
ine
(Questran
Lite)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
4 packets/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Colesevelam
(Welchol)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
6 tablets/day or
1 packet/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Colestipol
(Colestid)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
16 tablets/day or
6 scoops/day or
6 packets/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Ezetim
ibe/
atorvastatin
(Lipruzet)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
10/80 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Lipid Lowering Ag
ents ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Lipid Lowering Bile Acid Sequ
estran
ts ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Lipid Lowering Co
mbina
tions ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
137
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Aspirin (Legend)
(Easprin, Zorprin)
Less than
or eq
ual to
4000 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Choline Magnesium Sulfate
(Trisalicylate)
Less than
or eq
ual to
3000 m
g/day
10/28/1994
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
10/28/1994
Diclofenac
(Cataflam)
(Quick Release)
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
10/28/1994
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
10/28/1994
Diclofenac
(Voltaren
)
(Norm
al Release)
Less than
or eq
ual to
225 m
g/day
3/29/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Diclofenac Epolamine
(Flector Patch)
2 patches/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
3/10/2009
Diclofenac Potassium
(Zipsor)
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
g/day
12/14/2010
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
12/14/2010
Diflunisal
(Dolobid)
Less than
or eq
ual to
1500 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Etodolac
(Lodine)
Less than
or eq
ual to
1200 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Fenoprofen
(Nalfon)
Less than
or eq
ual to
3200 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Flurbiprofen
(Ansaid)
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Ibuprofen
(Motrin)
Less than
or eq
ual to
3200 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Indomethacin
(Indocin)
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Indomethacin SR
(Indocin SR)
Less than
or eq
ual to
200 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Non
‐Steroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Ag
ents (N
SAIDs) ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um Daily Dose
Maxim
um Duration
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
138
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Ketoprofen
(Orudis, O
ruvail)
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Ketorolac
(Toradol) Less than
or eq
ual to
60 m
g/day
7/15/1993
5 days out of 30 days
5/15/1995
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Ketorolac
(Toradol) Less than
or eq
ual to
40 m
g/day
7/5/1993
5 days out of 30 days
5/15/1995
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Meclofenam
ate
(Meclomen
)
Less than
or eq
ual to
400 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Mefen
amic Acid
(Ponstel)
Less than
or eq
ual to
1000 m
g/day
Future 2016
7 days out of 30 days
Future 2016
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Meloxicam
(Mobic)
Less than
or eq
ual to
15 m
g/day
5/13/2002
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
5/13/2002
Meloxicam
(Vivlodex)
Less than
or eq
ual to
10 m
g/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
7/5/2016
Nabumetone
(Relafen
)
Less than
or eq
ual to
2000 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Naproxen
(Naprosyn)
Less than
or eq
ual to
1500 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Naproxen Sodium
(Anaprox)
Less than
or eq
ual to
1650 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Oxaprozin
(Daypro)
Less than
or eq
ual to
1800 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Piroxicam
(Felden
e)
Less than
or eq
ual to
20 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Salsalate
(Disalcid)
Less than
or eq
ual to
3000 m
g/day
10/28/1994
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
10/28/1994
Sulindac
(Clinoril)
Less than
or eq
ual to
400 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Tolm
etin
(Tolectin)
Less than
or eq
ual to
1800 m
g/day
Future 2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Concurren
t NSA
IDS
8/16/1992
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric (B
rand
)Maxim
um Daily Dose
Maxim
um Duration
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Non
‐Steroidal Anti‐Inflammatory Ag
ents (N
SAIDs) ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates (C
ontin
ued)
139
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Fluvoxamine
(Luvox)
Less than
or eq
ual to
50 m
g/day
8/28/1995
Less than
or eq
ual to
300 m
g/day
8/28/1995
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Efinaconazole
(Jublia)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
4 m
l/16 days
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Griseofulvin, m
icrosize
and ultramicrosize
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
60/90
6/12/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Apixaban
(Eliquis)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
5 m
g/day if over 80
years of age
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Carbidopa/Levadopa
(Duopa)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual to
100 m
l/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Obsessive
‐Com
pulsive Disorde
r Agent ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Agen
ts to
Treat Onycomycosis ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Maxim
um Duration
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Oral A
nticoa
gulants ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Maxim
um Duration
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Agen
ts to
Treat Parkinson
's Disease ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Maxim
um Duration
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
140
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Dexlansoprazole
(Dexilant)
Less than
or eq
ual to 60
mg/day
12/14/2010
90 days out of 120
Future 2016
Proton Pump Inhibitors/
H2 Recep
tor Antagonists
12/14/2010
Esomep
razole
(Nexium)
Less than
or eq
ual to 40
mg/day
10/8/2001
90 days out of 120
Future 2016
Proton Pump Inhibitors/
H2 Recep
tor Antagonists
10/8/2001
Esomep
razole
strontium
Less than
or eq
ual to
49.3 m
g/day
Future 2016
90 days out of 120
Future 2016
Proton Pump Inhibitors/
H2 Recep
tor Antagonists
9/28/2015
Lansoprazole
(Prevacid)
Less than
or eq
ual to 30
mg/day
8/28/1995
90 days out of 120
Future 2016
Proton Pump Inhibitors/
H2 Recep
tor Antagonists
8/28/1995
Metoclopramide
(Reglan)
Less than
or eq
ual to 60
mg/day
10/28/1994
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Misoprostol
(Cytotec)
Less than
or eq
ual to
800 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Naproxen and
Lansoprazole
(Prevacid NapraPAC)
Omep
razole
(Prilosec)
Less than
or eq
ual to 40
mg/day
7/5/1993
90 days out of 120
Future 2016
Proton Pump Inhibitors/
H2 Recep
tor Antagonists
8/28/1995
Pantoprazole
(Protonix)
Less than
or eq
ual to 40
mg/day
10/8/2001
90 days out of 120
Future 2016
Proton Pump Inhibitors/
H2 Recep
tor Antagonists
10/8/2001
Rabep
razole
(Aciphex)
Less than
or eq
ual to 20
mg/day
10/8/2001
90 days out of 120
Future 2016
Proton Pump Inhibitors/
H2 Recep
tor Antagonists
10/8/2001
Sucralfate
(Carafate)
Less than
or eq
ual to
4000 m
g/day
7/5/1993
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Proton
Pum
p Inhibitors and
Other M
iscellane
ous G
astrointestin
al Agents ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Rem
oved from m
arket
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)Maxim
um Daily Dose
Maxim
um Duration
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
141
MG per day
Date
Begun
MG per day
Date
Begun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Amobarbital
(Amytal)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 200 m
g/day
6/7/2000
14 days out of every 180
6/7/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Amobarbital/Secobarbital
(Tuinal)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 50 m
g/day
11/26/1997
14 days out of every 180
4/20/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Butabarbital
(Butisol)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 90 m
g/day
11/26/1997
14 days out of every 180
4/20/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Chloral H
ydrate
(Somnote)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 1 gm/day
11/26/1997
14 days out of every 180
4/20/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Ethchlorvynol
(Placidyl)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 500 m
g/day
11/26/1997
14 days out of every 180
6/1/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Secobarbital
(Seconal)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 100 m
g/day
11/26/1997
14 days out of every 180
6/1/1998
No Criteria
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date
Begun
MG per day
Date
Begun
Class
Date
Begun
Perio
dDate
Begun
Baclofen
(Lioresal)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 80 m
g/day
6/5/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
21 days out
of 30
6/12/2000
Carisoprodol
(Soma)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 1400 m
g/day
6/5/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
21 days out
of 30
6/12/2000
Chlorzoxazone
(Parafon Forte)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 3000 m
g/day
6/5/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
21 days out
of 30
6/12/2000
Cycloben
zaprine
(Flexeril)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 30 m
g/day
4/19/2006
No Criteria
‐‐‐
21 days out
of 30
6/12/2000
Dantrolene
(Dantrium)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 400 m
g/day
6/5/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
21 days out
of 30
6/12/2000
Metaxalone
(Skelaxin)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 3200 m
g/day
6/5/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
21 days out
of 30
6/12/2000
Methocarbam
ol
(Robaxin)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 4500 m
g/day
6/5/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
21 days out
of 30
6/12/2000
Orphen
adrine Citrate
(Norflex)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 200 m
g/day
6/5/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
21 days out
of 30
6/12/2000
Tizanidine
(Zanaflex)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or eq
ual
to 36 m
g/day
6/5/2000
No Criteria
‐‐‐
21 days out
of 30
6/12/2000
Miscellane
ous S
edative/Hypno
tics ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Skeletal M
uscle Re
laxants ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
142
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Varen
icline
(Chantix)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
12 weeks followed
by another 12
weeks if smoking cessation has
been documen
ted
2/19/2007
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Zoster Vaccine Live
(Zostavax)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
No Criteria
‐‐‐
1 Injection per
lifetim
e12/8/2015
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
MG per day
Date Be
gun
MG per day
Date Be
gun
Class
Date Be
gun
Perio
dDate Be
gun
Arm
odafinil
(Nuvigil)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or
equal to 250
mg/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Modafinil
(Provigil)
No Criteria
‐‐‐
Less than
or
equal to 200
mg/day
7/5/2016
No Criteria
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
‐‐‐
Smok
ing Ce
ssation Ag
ent ‐ Criteria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Vaccines ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
yDuration of The
rapy
Duration of The
rapy
Wakefulne
ss Promoting Ag
ents ‐ Crite
ria Elemen
ts and
Implem
entatio
n Dates
Drug Nam
e Gen
eric
(Brand
)
Maxim
um In
itial Dose
Maxim
um Daily Dose
Dup
licate Th
erap
y
143
APPENDIX E
State Funded Pharmacy Programs
Utilizing the PACE Program Platform
Updated January 2016
144
STATE FUNDED PHARMACY PROGRAMS UTILIZING THE PACE PROGRAM PLATFORM
SECTION A: ENROLLMENT OUTREACH, ADJUDICATION, AND
CUSTOMER SUPPORT
PROGRAM NAME ACRONYM ENROLLEES MEMBER
APPLICATION PROCESSING
MEMBER ELIGIBILITY
DETERMINATION
MEMBER CUSTOMER SUPPORT
PART D PLAN COORDINATION1
PHARMACEUTICAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT FOR THE ELDERLY, PDA
PACE 118,769 YES YES YES YES
PHARMACEUTICAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT FOR THE ELDERLY NEEDS ENHANCEMENT TIER, PDA
PACENET 176,438 YES YES YES YES
ANCILLARY Rx BENEFIT PROGRAMS
CHRONIC RENAL DISEASE PROGRAM, DOH
CRDP 7,401 YES YES YES YES
SPECIAL PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS PROGRAM, HIV/AIDS, DOH
SPBP1 8,461 YES YES YES YES
SPECIAL PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS PROGRAM, MENTAL HEALTH, DHS
SPBP2 1,401 YES YES
CYSTIC FIBROSIS, DOH CF 18
SPINA BIFIDA, DOH SB 6
PHENYLKETONURIA DISEASE, DOH PKU 258
MAPLE SYRUP URINE DISEASE, DOH MSUD 0
AUTOMOTIVE CATASTROPHIC LOSS BNEEFITS CONTINUATION FUND, PDI
AUTO CAT FUND 439
WORKERS COMPENSATION SECURITY FUND, PDI
WCSF 1,279
PENNSYLVANIA PATIENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, PDA
PA PAP 12,627 YES YES YES
DEPARTMENT OF MILITARY AFFAIRS DMVA 525 YES YES YES YES
NON-BENEFIT SUPPORTED PROGRAMS
DEPARTMENT OF AGING PDA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DOC 51,121 YES YES
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES
DGS
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, GENERAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
GA
BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE (BENEFIT OUTREACH)
PBPP 343 YES YES YES YES
1 Includes exchange of enrollment and payment information with partner and non-partner plans; verification of premium invoices; and, management of cardholder drug coverage appeals and prior authorizations with Part D plans
Updated January 2016
145
SECTION B: CLAIMS ADJUDICATION AND PROVIDER SUPPORT
SECTION C: DUR INTERVENTIONS AND CLINICAL
SUPPORT
PHARMACY
CLAIMS
ANNUAL EXPENDITURES
CY 2014
PHARMACY CLAIMS
ADJUDICATION
PHARMACY NETWORK ENROLL-
MENT
PROVIDER CUSTOMER SUPPORT
PROVIDER AUDIT
SUPPORT
CLINICAL MANAGE-
MENT
FORMULARY MAINTEN-
ANCE
PACE 3,450,935 $76,239,100 YES YES YES YES YES YES
PACENET 4,795,176 $114,860,600 YES YES YES YES YES YES
CRDP 99,926 $4,468,100 YES YES YES YES YES YES
SPBP1 265,828 $90,789,400 YES YES YES YES YES
SPBP2 12,232 $1,218,000 YES YES YES YES YES
CF 138 $20,100 YES YES YES YES
SB 22178 $3,100 YES YES YES YES
PKU 1,970 $837,300 YES YES YES YES
MSUD - - YES YES YES YES
AUTO CAT
FUND 6,126 $942,400 YES YES YES YES YES YES
WCSF 11,129 $3,196,400 YES YES YES YES YES YES
PA PAP 8712 $258,400 YES YES YES YES YES
DMVA 4,604 $290,000 YES YES YES
PDA
DOC $47,500,000 YES YES YES
DGS
GA
PBPP
2 Includes online, real time claims adjudication; claim denials when claim exceeds drug utilization review criteria; and, seamless wrap-around of other pharmacy benefits.
Updated January 2016
146
SECTION D: CRITICAL OPERATIONS, FINANCE AND RESEARCH ACTIVITIES
FINANCIAL MGMT AND REPORTING
MANUFACTURER REBATE MGMT
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM DATA MGMT
MGMT REPORTING
AD HOC REPORTING
RESEARCH AND
EVALUATION
WEBSITE SUPPORT
PACE YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
PACENET YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
CRDP YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 3
SPBP1 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 3
SPBP2 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 3
CF YES YES YES YES YES YES
SB YES YES YES YES YES YES
PKU YES YES YES YES YES YES
MSUD YES YES YES YES YES YES
AUTO CAT FUND YES YES YES YES YES YES
WCSF YES YES YES YES YES YES
PA PAP YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
DMVA YES YES YES YES YES
PDA YES YES YES YES YES
DOC YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
DGS YES YES YES YES YES
GA YES
PBPP YES
3 Although technical support for the website is not provided, documentation relevant to the program is provided for inclusion on the website.
Updated January 2016
147