Pharmacokinetics of Diazepam Administer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/26/2019 Pharmacokinetics of Diazepam Administer

    1/2

    PPhhaarrmmaaccookkiinneettiiccss ooff ddiiaazzeeppaamm aaddmmiinniisstteerreedd iinnttrraammuussccuullaarrllyy bbyy

    aauuttooiinnjjeeccttoorr vveerrssuuss rreeccttaall ggeell iinn hheeaalltthhyy ssuubbjjeeccttss:: aa pphhaassee II,,

    rraannddoommiizzeedd,, ooppeenn--llaabbeell,, ssiinnggllee--ddoossee,, ccrroossssoovveerr,, ssiinnggllee--cceennttrree

    ssttuuddyy..

    Lamson MJ, et al. Show all

    Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31(8):585-97. doi: 10.2165/11590250-000000000-00000.

    Pfizer Inc, Cary, NC, USA.

    AAbbssttrraacctt

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Acute repetitive seizures (ARS) are a

    debilitating part of episodic seizure activity that can sometimes progress to

    status epilepticus. Currently approved treatment that can be administered by

    non-medical personnel to patients with ARS is a diazepam rectal gel. While

    effective, rectal administration can be difficult, inconvenient and objectionable. A

    diazepam autoinjector has been developed to deliver diazepam via an

    intramuscular (IM) injection. This study evaluated the dose proportionality of the

    diazepam autoinjector and the consequent diazepam bioavailability relative to

    an equivalent dose of diazepam administered rectally as a commercial gel.

    METHODS: This was a phase I, randomized, open-label, two-part, single-dose,

    crossover, single-centre pharmacokinetic study in 48 healthy young adult (aged

    18-40 years) male and female subjects. Part I of the study (n = 24) evaluated the

    dose proportionality of three strengths of the diazepam autoinjector (5, 10 and

    15 mg) administered into the mid-outer thigh via a deep IM injection. Part II (n =

    24) assessed the relative bioavailability of the diazepam 10 mg autoinjector

    versus the diazepam 10 mg rectal gel. Parts I and II were run concurrently. Each

    subject completed screening up to 30 days prior to three (Part I) or two (Part II)

    dosing periods. Serial blood sampling for plasma diazepam and

    desmethyldiazepam (metabolite) concentrations, vital signs and adverse event(AE) assessments were performed at prespecified times. Treatments were

    separated by a 14-day washout period.

    RESULTS: In Part I, dose proportionality was demonstrated for the diazepam

    autoinjector at 5, 10 and 15 mg doses by increases in mean maximum plasma

    concentration (C(max)), mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve

    (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC()), and mean AUC from time zero to time

    of last measurable concentration (AUC(last)). The median time to reach C(max)

    (t(max)) was consistent at 1 hour for each dose. In Part II of the study, IM

    Search term

  • 7/26/2019 Pharmacokinetics of Diazepam Administer

    2/2

    administration via diazepam autoinjector (10 mg) resulted in plasma

    concentrations of both diazepam and desmethyldiazepam that were slightly

    higher and less variable than those observed following administration of

    diazepam rectal gel (10 mg). The geometric mean ratio (diazepam

    autoinjector/diazepam rectal gel) and 90% confidence intervals for diazepam

    C(max) and AUC(last) were 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) and 1.14 (1.08, 1.21), respectively,

    indicating that the overall bioavailability of the diazepam autoinjector was

    approximately 14% higher than that of diazepam rectal gel. Both treatments were

    generally well tolerated. Although the incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was

    higher with diazepam autoinjector compared with diazepam rectal gel (21.7% vs

    13.6%), the difference can be attributed to injection site pain. Injection site pain

    also correlated with the diazepam autoinjector dose administered in Part I: 5 mg

    (4.3%), 10 mg (21.7%) and 15 mg (27.3%). However, no patients discontinued the

    trial due to injection site pain. No other AEs correlated with dose, and there was

    no evidence of respiratory depression with either administration.

    CONCLUSION: Results of the present study indicated that diazepam can be

    safely and reliably administered IM using a diazepam autoinjector.

    PMID 21721594 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Full text: Springer

    RReellaatteedd CCiittaattiioonnss Show all

    Bioavailability and dose proportionality of intramuscular diazepam administered by

    autoinjector.

    Diazepam autoinjector intramuscular delivery system versus diazepam rectal gel: Apharmacokinetic comparison.

    A phase I, randomized, open-label, crossover study of the single-dose pharmacokinetic

    properties of guanfacine extended-release 1-, 2-, and 4-mg tablets in healthy adults.

    Dose proportionality of fentanyl buccal tablet in doses ranging from 600 to 1300 microg

    in healthy adult subjects: a randomized, open-label, four-period, crossover, single-centre

    study.

    Single-dose pharmacokinetics of once-daily cyclobenzaprine extended release 30 mg

    versus cyclobenzaprine immediate release 10 mg three times daily in healthy young

    adults : a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover, single-centre study.