Upload
lamxuyen
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Photodetectors for Optical Fiber Communications
T. P. LeeChief Scientist and Director, Bellcore (retired)
Program Director, NSF (1997-1999)
Princeton University (2000-2003)
EE 233 Seminar
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
• Principle of Photodetectorsabsorption, collection, types, responsivity, quantum efficiency,
• PIN Photodiodesstructures, Si-pin diodes, InGaAs pin diodes, rise-time and
bandwidth, quantum efficiency-bandwidth trade-off• High-speed pin diodes
small-area pin diodes, waveguide photodetector, traveling-wave photodetector, resonant cavity photodetector
• Avalanche PhotodiodesAvalanche multiplication, ionization rates, Si-APDs, InGaAs/InP
APDs, SAM-APD, SAGM-APD, gain-bandwidth product, excess noise factor of APDs.
• OEIC Receiversp-i-n/MODFET, p-i-n/HBT
• PIN and APD NoiseShot noise, thermal noise, signal-to-noise ratio
• Comparison of Receiver Sensitivities
Outline
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Types of Photodetectors
• MSM PhotodetectorsPhotoconductors
Schottky Barriers
• PIN Photodiodes• Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs)• Photo-Transistors
complexity
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Photo-detection Process
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
The Photodetection Process in a PN Junction
When the incident photon energy hƲ > Eg, the photons are absorbed and electron-hole pairs are generated.
Under the influence of an electric field by the applied voltage, electrons and holes are swept across the the drift region, resulting in a flow of electric current in the load resistor.
The optical power absorbed is
Pabs = P0(1-r) [1-exp(-αd)]00
d
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Responsitivity• Photocurrent
fraction absorbed in semiconductor
( )( )dph er
hPqI α
ν−−−⎟
⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛= 110
electronic charge
# incident photons per second
reflectivity at air-to-semiconductor interface
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Responsitivity (cont’d)• Responsitivity
)1)(1(0
dph erhq
PI
R α
ν−−−==
Photocurrent
Incident optical power
( ) ( )24.1ληνη ee hqR ==
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Quantum Efficiency• External Quantum Efficiency
• Internal Quantum Efficiency
( ) )1(1 dei er αηη −−=−=
( )[ ]dphe er
hPqI α
νη −−−== 11
0
# electrons collected
# incident photons
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Optical Absorption Coefficients
Si, Ge
• indirect-bandgap.
• slow increase in absorption near the band edge.
• α ~ 102 -103cm-1 (si)
GaAs, InGaAs
• direct–bandgap
• sharp increase in absorption near the band edge.
• α ~ 104 cm-1
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Si p-i-n Photodiode
• i-region width = 20-50 µm
• Quantum efficiency is peaked at 800 nm
• Device was used for early optical fiber transmission systems at 0.8-0.9 µm wavelength using GaAlAslasers
T.P.Lee and T. Li, Chapter 18 in Optical Fiber Communications, ed. S.E. Miller and A.G. Chynoweth, Academic Press, 1979
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Responsivity of InGaAsPhotodiode
• η = 70% no AR coating
• = 90% with AR coating
• back illuminationT.P.Lee, et al., IEEE J. Quantum Electronics, QE-15, p. 30 (1979)
T.P.Lee, Photodetectors, Chapter 5 in FiberOptics, ed. James Daly, CRC Press, (1984)
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Rise Time and Bandwidth
• The output voltage across the load R is
• The rise time is
• The bandwidth is
[ ]RCtout eVV /
0 1 −−=
( )( )
===
+=
dtr
RC
RCtrr
VdRC
T
ττ
ττ9ln
( )[ ]RCtrf ττπ +=Δ 21
Transit time
Trade off between quantum efficiency and bandwidth
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Charateristics of p-i-nPhotodiodes
Parameter Unit Si InGaAsWavelength (λ) µm 0.4 – 1.1 1.0 – 1.7Responsivity (R) A/W 0.4 – 0.6 0.6 – 0.9Quantum eff. (η) % 75 – 90 60 – 70Dark current (Id) nA 1 – 10 1 – 20Rise time (Tr) ns 0.5 – 1* 0.02 – 0.5Bandwidth (Δf) GHz 0.3 – 0.6* 1 – 10Bias voltage (Vb) V 50 – 100* 5 – 10
* For 0.8 to 0.9 µm wavelength region
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Quantum Efficiency and Bandwidth Trade-off
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Methods for Increased Bandwidth and Quantun Efficiency
• Reduction of RC time-constant by- small diode diameter or area- integrated bias tee- waveguide photodetector- traveling wave photodetector
• Increasing quantum efficiency by- resonant cavity photodetector
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
A High-Speed InGaAs pin Photodiode
• Area = 25 µm2
• Q.E. = 31%
• Δf = 42 GHz
Crawford et al., IEEE Photonic Technology Letters, 2, p.647 (1990)
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
InGaAs photodiode with integrated Bias Tee and Matched Resistor
Y.-G. Wey et al., IEEE Photonic Technology Letters, 5, p.1310 (1993)
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
InGaAs Waveguide Photodetector
Wake et al., Electronic Letters, 27, p.1073 (1991)
Kato et al., IEEE Photonics Tech. Lett. 6, p.719 (1994)
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
InGaAs Traveling Wave Photodetector
K.S. Giboney et al., IEEE Photonic Tech. Lett., 7, p.412 (1995)
η = 44%
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
InP/InGaAsP/InGaAs Resonant Cavity Photodiode
(R2)
(R1)
A.G.Dentai et al., Electronic Letters, 27, p.2125 (1991)
I.-H. Tan et al., IEEE Photonics Tech. Lett., 6, p. 811 (1994)
Dentai, η = 82%, Tan, η = 93%,
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Transit Time and RC Bandwidth
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Avalanche Photodiodep ni
E
• limited gain-bandwidth product
• higher avalanche noise
(c) Electron ionization rate is larger than hole ionization rate
• large gain-bandwidth product
• lower avalanche noise
(a) p-i-n diode in high electric field (105V/cm) results in impact ionization.
(b) Electron and hole ionization rates are almost equal
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Ionization Rate – Si & Ge
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Ionization Rate - InGaAs
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Avalanche Multiplication for an Uniform E-field
• β = 0,
• α = β,
• β << α,
( )wdxMw
e αα expexp0
=⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡= ∫
( )wdxMMw
he αα −=⎥⎦⎤
⎢⎣⎡ −== ∫ 1111
0
( )[ ]αβ
α
=
−−−−
=
eff
effeff
effe
kkwk
kM
1exp1
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Gain & Bandwidth of APD
Mo < α/β
Bandwidth is almost independent of gain
Mo > α/β
Gain-Bandwidth product is limited
GB=(α/β)/NTav
N = 1/3 to 2
Tav= ave. transit time
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Excess Noise Factor
F = keffMe+[2-1/Me](1-keff)
keff = β/α
Electron ionization only, β=0
F = 2
Both e & h ionization, β/α=1
F = M
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Si Reach-through APD Structure
• p+-π-p-n+ reach-through structure
• high field appears at the pn+ junction
• low field in the π-(nearly intrinsic) drift region
• electrons drift toward pn+ junction initiates impact ionization
• holes drifting in the low-field π-region toward p+ result in no ionization
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Si Avalanche Photodiode
•λ= 825 nm
• G >100
• gain reduces at high temperature
T.P.Lee and T. Li, Chapter 18, Optical Fiber Communications, ed. S. E. Miller and A. G. Chynoweth, Academic Press (1979)
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Si – APD Excess Noise Factor
T.P.Lee and T. Li, Chapter 18, Optical Fiber Communications, ed. S. E. Miller and A. G. Chynoweth, Academic Press (1979)
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Dark Current of InGaAs PIN PD
( )[ ]kTVqAwqnI effirg 2exp1)( −−=− τ
[ ]mgtun EqEmAI h/exp 23210θγ −=
Idiff+Ig-r
Itun
The dark current of InGaAs p-i-ndiode is dominated by the tunneling current at high voltages:
( )( ) 21
0*
2321*2
mm
hVEqEm mg
κθ
γ
=
=
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
InGaAs Separate Absorption and Multiplication APD (SAM-APD)
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
SAM APD Boundary Conditions
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
InGaAs SAM-APD Structures
Mesa Structure Planar Structure
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
SAM-APD Dark Current
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Pulse response of SAM-APD
The long tail is due to holes piling up at the InP/InGaAs interface
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
SAGM APD Band StructureGraded Layer
InP InGaAs
InGaAsP
A graded layer is added to reduce trapped holes
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Frequency Response: SAGM APD vs SAM APD
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Gain-Bandwidth Product of InGaAs SAGM-APD
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Improved GxB Product SAGM APD
Gain x Bandwidth = 122 GHz
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Excess Noise Factor of InGaAs SAGM APD
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Multiple Quantum Well APD
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
InAlGaAs/InAlAs Multiple Quantum Well APD
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Resonant-Cavity SAM APD
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Resonant-Cavity SAM APD
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Bandwidth vs Multiplication
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
A p-i-n/MODFET OEIC Receiver
• Single epitaxial growth on recessed substrate
• High yield OEIC
• 3-dB bandwidth of 6 GHz
T.P.Lee and S. Chandrasekhar, Chapter 7 in Modern Semiconductor Device Physics, ed. S. M. Sze, John Wiley and sons, 1998
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
A p-i-n/HBT OEIC Receiver
• Both p-i-n and HBT are grown on a single planar substrate.
• then they are separated by wet chemical etching.
• 3-dB bandwidth of 20 GHz achieved.
T.P.Lee and S. Chandrasekhar, Chapter 7 in Modern Semiconductor Device Physics, ed. S. M. Sze, John Wiley and sons, 1998
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Photodetector Noise• Shot Noise – the photo
current is consisted of a stream of electron-hole pairs that are generated randomly in response to the optical signal. The current flucturationproduces shot noise.
• The current fluctuation follows Poisson statistics.
• The spectral density of shot noise is constant
• The total shot noise
( ) ps qIfs =
( ) ( )tiItI sp +=
( ) ( ) fqIdffsti psss Δ=== ∫∞
∞−222σ
( )dps IIq += 22σ
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Photodetector Noise (cont’d)• Thermal Noise –due to
the random motion of electrons in a conductor
• Modeled with Gaussian statistics
• Spectral density is independent of frequency
• Total photodetectornoise
( ) ( ) ( )titiItI Tsp ++=
( ) LBT RTkfs 2=
( )
( ) ( ) fRTkdffs
ti
LBT
TT
Δ==
=
∫∞
∞−4
22σ
( ) fRTkIIq LBdpTs Δ++=+= ]42[222 σσσ
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
P-i-n Receiver Noise• Singal-to-Noise
Ratio
• Thermal-Noise Limit
• Shot-Noise Limit
( ) ( ) fRTkfIRPqPR
ISNR
LBdin
in
p
Δ+Δ+=
=
42
22
22 σ
fTkPRRSNR
B
inL
Δ=
4
22
fqRPSNR in
Δ=
2
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
APD Receiver Noise
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( ) fRTkfIRPFqM
MRPSNR
MkMkMFfIRPFqM
MRPI
LBdin
in
effeff
dins
inp
Δ+Δ+=
−−+=Δ+=
=
/42
1212
2
2
22σ
EE233 3/9/06 TPLee
Photoreciever Sensitivities vs Bit Rate
T.P.Lee and S. Chandrasekhar, Chapter 7 in Modern Semiconductor Device Physics, ed. S. M. Sze, John Wiley and Sons, 1998