48
Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I Spring 2013

Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

  • Upload
    lala

  • View
    50

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Spring 2013. Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I. Outline. Systematics Phenetics (brief review) Phylogenetics & Characters Evolutionary Trees. Systematics. Science of organismal diversity. Discovery, description and interpretation of biological diversity. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Spring 2013

Page 2: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Outline Systematics

Phenetics (brief review)

Phylogenetics & Characters

Evolutionary Trees

Page 3: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Systematics Science of organismal diversity. Discovery, description and interpretation of

biological diversity. Discovery and description of the evolutionary

tree of life. Synthesis of information in the form of

predictive classification systems. Production of identification tools (e.g., keys,

floras and faunas, monographs, etc.)

Page 4: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Some important definitions Systematics = the study of the biological

diversity on Earth and its evolutionary history. Taxon (pl. taxa) = a group of organisms distinct

enough to be distinguished by a name and ranked in a definite category.

Classification = the delimitation, ordering and ranking of taxa.

Taxonomy = the theory and practice of classifying organisms.

Page 5: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phylogenetics Greek: • phylon = tribe, race • genetikos = refers to birth

(from genesis = birth)

= the study of the evolutionary relationships of organisms

Phylogeny = evolutionary relationships; genealogical (through time)

Page 6: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phenetics:Historically, systematists relied on similarities to classify organisms

Pheno = Greek for display, referring to visible characteristics

Phenetics = method of classifying organisms based on overall similarity

Page 7: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phenetic Classification Systems

Were originally designed to reflect God’s plan of creation [“natural order”]

Later systems were considered “natural” in that presumably related plants were grouped together.

Were based on many characters selected from experience, not from a pre-existing theory

Overall similarity was the main criterion; all characters had equal weight

Page 8: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phenetics vs. PhylogeneticsVertebrate limbs

Page 9: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

A plant example:

cacti euphorbs

Page 10: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phenetics is not Sufficient….

• Modern systematists seek an evolutionary interpretation for the relationships between organisms.

• Simple “matching” or relationships based on superficial similarity may not reflect evolutionary relationships.

• Testability and identification of specific characters used to group taxa is lacking in most phenetic methods.

• Character-based, evolutionarily interpreted inter-taxon comparisons deemed superior!

Page 11: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phylogenetics & Characters• Based on an explicit set of a priori

assumptions on how the characters used have evolved. Relies heavily on evolutionary information.

• Data are scored and analyzed following testable methods using shared derived character states to build evolutionary trees (phylogenies).

• Methods are continually being developed that enhance the reliability of the analyses, and that provide tests for statistical support for the groups determined by the process. (More on this later…)

Page 12: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

What is a character?Character = any feature of the organism,

especially one with variation that helps to define groups. E.g., flower color.

Character state = one of the various conditions or values of a character observed across a given group of taxa. E.g., red, white, pink, yellow are states for flower color.

Page 13: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Another example:

Character = leaf arrangement.

Character states = ???

Page 14: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Another example:

Character = leaf arrangement.

Character states (depending on the group) =-alternate-opposite-whorled

Page 15: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phylogenetic Analyses

Philosophy:

Determine relationships based upon uniquely derived and shared character state changes as evidence of common ancestry. Relies on the principle of homology.

Page 16: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

What is HOMOLOGY?

Page 17: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

What is HOMOLOGY?Similarity due to inheritance of a feature from a common ancestor; may be associated with a change in function.

Page 18: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

CharactersHomologous characters (homology)• Character states of 2 or more taxa are homologous if the character is found in their common ancestor

• 2 character states (or features) are homologous if one is directly (or sequentially) derived from another

a

a

a

a’

a

Page 19: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Leaf modified as:-pitcher for catching insects-jaws for catching insects-colored, petal-like bracts for attracting pollinators-spines for protection

Page 20: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

CharactersHomologous characters• example: perianth (petal & sepal) modification

Page 21: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

An animal exampleForelimbs of human, cat, whale, bat

Page 22: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

CharactersHomoplasious characters (homoplasy)Result of convergence, parallelisms,

or reversals• Describes a character state found in 2 taxa if the common ancestor did not have this character or one character state is not the precursor of another (= superficial similarity)

Page 23: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Remember this?

Cacti (vegetative) Euphorbs (vegetative)

Page 24: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

• cacti • euphorbs

Flowers and fruits showthat these are two groupswith different origins.

Page 25: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

CharactersHomologous vs. Homoplasious

• Similarity – includes detailed structure• Position• Development• Congruence – various types of evidence give the same answer

Page 26: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

CharactersHomologous characters

• molecular evidence: genetic basis for homology (or not!) of basic features and how they have been modified

ABC model of floral organ identity

Page 27: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

TIM

E

C B A

Evolutionary Trees

Page 28: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

TIM

E

C B A

Stem shape Petal number

Evolutionary Trees

Page 29: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

C B A

Stem shape

Petal number

Evolutionary Trees

Page 30: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

TIM

E

C B A

square stem

5 petals

Evolutionary Trees

Stem shape Petal number

Page 31: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Terminology

Apomorphy = derived character state

Plesiomorphy = ancestral character state

In the example we just looked at, which character states are apomorphic? Plesiomorphic?

Page 32: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Terminology

Apomorphy = derived character state

Plesiomorphy = ancestral character state

In the example we just looked at, which character states are apomorphic? Plesiomorphic?

Apomorphic: square stems, 5 petalsPlesiomorphic: round stems, 4 petals

Page 33: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Terminology

Synapomorphy – shared derived character for two or more taxa or lineages; defines clades.

Symplesiomorphy – shared ancestral (underived) character – uninformative.

Autapomorphy – derived character state occurring in only ONE taxon – uninformative.

Clade – group of taxa defined by at least one synapomorphy; branch of an evolutionary tree; a lineage.

Page 34: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

TerminologyFor our purposes:

an evolutionary tree = phylogeny = cladogram

The shape of the tree (the branching order) is known as the topology.

Page 35: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Equivalent (Congruent) Cladograms

Cladograms 1, 2, and 3 have the same topology.

Page 36: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

The Same Cladogram…

…these trees are topologically congruent.

Page 37: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Common Phylogenetic Tree Terminology

Clades or Branches or lineagesTerminal nodesAncestral node or rootSister groupsInternal nodes or divergence pointsPolytomy

Page 38: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I
Page 39: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

(plesiomorphic)

(apomorphic)

Page 40: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phylogenetic definitions of groups/taxa

Monophyletic taxon – contains a common ancestor and all of its descendents

Page 41: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

A clade by definition is monophyletic!

Page 42: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phylogenetic definition of groups/taxa

Paraphyletic taxon – contains a common ancestor and some, but not all of its descendents

Page 43: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Example of Paraphyly

The term “invertebrate” is used to describeall metazoans without a vertebral column—This is a group that does not include alldescendents of animals.

Page 44: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Phylogenetic definition of groups/taxa

Polyphyletic taxon – a composite taxon derived from 2 or more ancestral sources (taxa)

Page 45: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Examples of monophyly and paraphyly

Page 46: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Example of polyphylyTraditional concept of plants included:

Green plants

Fungi

Blue-green algae(cyanobacteria)

Euglenas

Red algae Diatoms

Page 47: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Tree of Life Showing Groups Previously Classified as Plants

(see Fig. 1.1 in Simpson)

Page 48: Phylogenetic Analysis – Part I

Another way to think about it.

monophyletic paraphyletic polyphyletic

Source: Stuessy (1990)