45
PIECE OF MIND Hidden Treasure: Solving the Revenue Puzzle For Local Government CPBB Conference Denver 2014

PIECE OF MIND Hidden Treasure: Solving the Revenue Puzzle For Local Government CPBB Conference Denver 2014

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Slide 2
  • PIECE OF MIND Hidden Treasure: Solving the Revenue Puzzle For Local Government CPBB Conference Denver 2014
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • Agenda Just the Facts Please National Survey Data Stats and Findings Why Revenue Enhancement ? Because its there and its needed Equity among taxpayers Changing landscape challenges How? Sources and Methods More local control of revenues Training, attention, focus the Hunt
  • Slide 5
  • Just the Facts Survey Of 1,140 City Finance Officers 31 % Response 17.2% over 300K pop 39.7% 100K-299K pop 24.0% 50K-99K pop 19.1% 10K-49K pop Variety of Scope and Function of Governments Revenue Generating Authority Varies State to State 3 Primary Sources of Local Government Revenue: Property Tax (nearly all) Sales Tax (50%) Income Tax (10%) Source: NLC 2013 Survey of Cities
  • Slide 6
  • Slide 7
  • Slide 8
  • Slide 9
  • Slide 10
  • Revenue Actions 2 in 5 (39%) of city finance officers report raised fee levels Approximately 1 in 4 cities increased the number of fees that are applied to city services (22%), and 1 in 5 (19%) cities increased the local property tax in 2013
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Proportion of Total State and Local Tax Revenues by Tax Type and State Fiscal Year 2010 State Property Taxes Sales & Gross Receipts Personal Income Corporate Income Motor Vehicle Licenses and Other Taxes Alabama 19.40%47.50%20.30%3.20% 9.60% Alaska 21.40%10.90%--10.40% 57.30% Arizona 37.30%44.40%12.30%2.10% 4.00% Arkansas 18.30%50.50%22.00%4.10% 5.10% California 31.20%30.10%26.40%5.30% 7.00% Colorado 39.10%32.90%20.00%1.80% 6.20% Connecticut 42.00%25.10%26.90%2.40% 3.60% Delaware 18.60%13.20%25.30%4.10% 38.80% Florida 42.90%46.90%--2.70% 7.40% Georgia 35.20%36.50%23.30%2.30% 2.80% Hawaii 21.10%49.20%23.20%1.20% 5.40% Idaho 30.20%35.30%24.60%2.30% 7.70% Illinois 43.60%31.70%15.90%2.50% 6.30% Indiana 32.80%37.00%23.30%2.60% 4.30% Iowa 34.80%33.50%23.00%1.60% 7.10% Kansas 34.40% 23.60%3.10% 4.50%
  • Slide 14
  • State Property Taxes Sales & Gross Receipts Personal Income Corporate Income Motor Vehicle Licenses and Other Taxes Kentucky 21.50%38.00%30.40%3.50% 6.50% Louisiana 20.90%54.00%14.20%2.40% 8.50% Maine 40.70%28.70%22.30%3.00% 5.40% Maryland 30.10%24.40%35.60%3.20% 6.70% Massachusetts 38.80%20.90%30.30%5.50% 4.60% Michigan 40.30%36.50%16.40%1.90% 4.80% Minnesota 30.70%33.50%26.50%3.00% 6.40% Mississippi 28.20%46.70%15.10%3.50% 6.50% Missouri 30.20%37.70%24.30%1.40% 6.30% Montana 39.80%16.80%22.20%2.90% 18.40% Nebraska 36.80%31.90%20.60%2.10% 8.60% Nevada 34.50%50.50%-- 15.00% New Hampshire 64.60%16.00%1.60%10.00% 7.80% New Jersey 48.40%22.40%20.20%4.00% 5.00% New Mexico 19.80%49.80%14.60%1.90% 13.80% New York 32.40%25.30%31.20%6.70% 4.40% North Carolina 26.20%36.00%27.90%4.00% 5.90%
  • Slide 15
  • State Property Taxes Sales & Gross Receipts Personal Income Corporate Income Motor Vehicle Licenses and Other Taxes North Dakota 19.80%31.00%8.70%2.50% 38% - Severance Taxes Ohio 30.00%32.50%27.70%0.60% 9.10% Oklahoma 21.10%41.90%19.50%1.90% 15.60% Oregon 37.60%10.00%37.70%3.00% 11.60% Pennsylvania 30.40%31.20%25.40%3.70% 9.40% Rhode Island 45.60%29.50%18.90%2.50% 3.50% South Carolina 35.80%34.50%20.30%1.10% 8.20% South Dakota 35.90%53.60%--1.20% 9.30% Tennessee 27.60%56.80%1.00%4.90% 9.80% Texas 45.20%44.30%-- 10.50% Utah 27.60%37.50%25.30%3.00% 6.60% Vermont 45.90%29.20%16.60%2.90% 5.50% Virginia 36.10%26.50%27.80%2.50% 7.10% Washington 31.50%60.50%--0.00% 8.00% West Virginia 21.30%37.50%23.50%3.70% 14.00% Wisconsin 39.50%28.90%23.80%3.50% 4.30% Wyoming 42.50%31.20%-- 26.20% DC 37.00%27.00%22.00%6.50% 7.50% Source: Census Bureau, Tax Foundation calculations.
  • Slide 16
  • Slide 17
  • Shrinking Staff Levels Government job cuts not falling evenly Number of employees at each level April 2009April 2013 Absolute Change Percent Change Federal (Postal Service)721,800589,500-132,300-18.3% Federal (Other)2,199,2002,179,200-20,000-0.9% State (Education)2,366,6002,397,80031,2001.3% State (Other)2,815,5002,655,200-160,300-5.7% Local (Education)8,094,3007,758,000-336,300-4.2% Local (Other)6,482,0006,264,400-217,600-3.4% Total22,679,40021,844,100835,300-3.7% Source: Pew Research analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data PEW RESEARCH CENTER
  • Slide 18
  • Pressure Factors (As Noted by City Finance Officers) City Budget Infrastructure Costs Public Safety Costs Employee Costs: Health Care, Pensions, Wages Cuts in State & Federal Aid Leading the List Health Benefit Costs (84%) Pension Costs (80%) Most Often Noted Increase in Service Demands Infrastructure (79%) Public Safety (69%) Other Notable Increase Costs of Services (81%).
  • Slide 19
  • Pressure Factors (continued) Confronted with these pressures, cities are maintaining local services while continuing to reduce personnel costs for pensions, health care benefits, and wages. Levels of Federal Aid (49%) and State Aid (48%) 33 States have Tax/Expenditure Limits (TELs) constraining their ability to raise revenue locally About 50% are constitutionally imposed and 50% are legislative 15 states require a supermajority of the legislature to raise taxes (2/3 to 3/4 vote)
  • Slide 20
  • REVENUE ENHANCEMENT? The Moneys Out There
  • Slide 21
  • F.P.S.-Fiscal Policy Space (Pagano) City & County
  • Slide 22
  • Revenue Enhancement Enhance to increase or improve (Webster) The identification and collection of unpaid revenues from non-compliant taxpayers subject to existing revenue laws Staff training and education Over $24,500,000 discovered to date from Business License and other Taxes from existing businesses A no risk program based on a contingency of new revenue discovered and collected
  • Slide 23
  • Address the Issues Most State Governments Restrict Local Government From Adding New Taxes, TELs Pent Up Infrastructure And Maintenance Needs Increased Operational Costs Pensions, Health, Public Safety, Bond Ratings, The Future, Tax & License Databases Outdated, Inaccurate Revenue Departments Understaffed, Lack of Training, Overworked, Complacent 22
  • Slide 24
  • The Trend Gap The difference between governments long-term ability to provide services the public demands, and the citizens willingness to pay for them 2010: Gap exceeded $1,100 per capita, i.e., the revenue raising capacity of governments fell short of the amount needed by more than $1,000 per person Trend Gap varies greatly by region: Pacific is highest at $1,600; New England at $1,250; and East-South-Central states at $750 per capita Revenues have increased since recession. Gap continues to rise due to long-term obligations (Medicaid and Pensions) Source: US Census Bureau, Pew Research Ctr
  • Slide 25
  • Not Trending Close to Pre 2010 Levels Source: US Census Bureau, and Janney FIS. Levels $300 $500 $700 200420072010201320162019 Actual U.S. Local Government Tax Revenues The yellow line shows how revenues were trending before the Great Recession, when U.S. growth was much higher The green line is a revenue trend based on local govt revenues from just post 2010 results This difference is a reason why some local govt. issuers are susceptible to rating downgrades Notice the trend of local govt tax revenues since 2010 is barely higher, this is not a positive for local government credit quality Local Tax Revenues
  • Slide 26
  • Gap Consequences Shifts fiscal burden to future generations of taxpayers Requires significant cut backs on public services harming residents quality of life and local businesses Credit Ratings will suffer increasing borrowing costs Los Angeles 2020 Commission A Time for Truth Challenging Issues Widespread poverty, job stagnation, pension obligations, and paralyzing traffic Barely treading water and year by year our city is becoming less livable
  • Slide 27
  • Can Governments Give People What They Want? Current demand for services outpaces ability of government to meet, even by raising taxes Officials tend to focus on next budget or election Short-term outlook fails to open discussion on what services have to cease as we continue to consume more without developing new revenue resources Somethings gotta give Believe the arithmetic Achieve Service level solvency Source: Governing
  • Slide 28
  • NLC Report 80% of Americans Live in Cities Cities Produce 75% of Economic Output Need to Form Partnerships with Local Governments, Citizens, Business, NPOs, Feds, State, County CITIES ARE DETERMINED RENEWED OPTIMISM CREATIVE LEADERSHIP CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT PARTNERSHIPS
  • Slide 29
  • NLC Report (continued) 10 Critical Imperatives Face Cities in 2014 & Beyond 1.Fragile Fiscal Health 2.Deteriorating Transportation Infrastructure 3.Shrinking Middle Class 4.Inadequate Access to Higher Education 5.Need for Affordable Housing 6.Returning Veterans 7.Gang Violence 8.Broken Immigration System 9.Climate Change and Extreme Weather 10.Lack of Public Trust
  • Slide 30
  • Why Revenue Enhancement? Achieves equity and compliance among taxpayers through uniform application of the existing tax and revenue laws Provides an opportunity to increase revenue and pay for program with a % of new revenue collected Levels the playing field Improves credibility with the stakeholders Provides current year revenue boost and annually recurring revenues Records businesses and improves databases
  • Slide 31
  • The Changing Landscape Political: Continued reduction in State and Federal Assistance Paralyzing Gridlock in DC Social: The Perfect Storm: decline in personal income, retail sales, property values, vacancies and unemployment Erosion of Public Trust and Confidence Cultural: E-commerce Consumer to Business, Business to Business Consumer Spending Trend Goods to Services
  • Slide 32
  • Consumer Spending Trends Reaction has been to increase sales tax rates and base Between 1970 & 2007 average state sales tax rate increased from 3.5% to 5.4% in 60% of states (27) 19702009 Taxable Goods39%32% (excl. groceries) Non-Taxable Services31%67%
  • Slide 33
  • Slide 34
  • E-Commerce Impact on Sales Tax Revenue Tax losses from e-commerce sales estimated $11.4B in 2012 among collections of $34.5B (Fox/Bruce) E-Commerce sales: $2.385 Trillion in 2006 to $4.0 Trillion in 2012 (U.S. Census Bureau) Shop on Main Street Purchase on-line Remote Commerce not included above (mail order,etc) Business to Business Sales account for 93% Fox/Bruce study assumes 5% compliance with use tax by consumers Consumer use tax near impossible to collect/enforce
  • Slide 35
  • Tax on Services ? 2009 Estimate $1.621 Trillion in purchases of feasibly taxable services $87B revenue to States based on sales tax rates Yield ranges from $13B in CA to $137M in Wyoming Some services currently taxed in some states
  • Slide 36
  • HOW DO WE ENHANCE REVENUES The Moneys Out There
  • Slide 37
  • Property, Sales, and IncomeWhat else is there? Financial Institution Tax Utility, Cable and Telecommunication Franchise Fees E-911 Fees Business Inventory General Sales and Use Alcohol Beverage Excise Tax Personal Property Tax Motor Vehicle Business/Occupation Tax Cell Tower Rental Income Aircraft, and Boats Personal Property Tax Billboard Advertising Fees and Taxes 36
  • Slide 38
  • State License Taxes 2009-2013 20092013 Total License Taxes$49.7 Billion$55.5 Billion Motor Vehicle License Tax$19.9 Billion$23.2 Billion Corporate License Tax*$10.0 Billion$11.4 Billion *2009 was the first decrease in Corporate License Taxes in over 16 years.
  • Slide 39
  • Training - Lessons Learned Technology: Review current software capabilities to ensure local tax databases are current and contain relevant taxpayer information Analysis: Analyze taxpayer data for reporting and accuracy, trends, anomalies Training and Education: Revenue staff should develop complete understanding of requirements and importance of accuracy and detail Avoid: Practices that do not follow local ordinances Focus: On compliance and revenue opportunities Communication: Reinforce value of front counter and celebrate successes Communicate with your taxpayers
  • Slide 40
  • Due to limited personnel, the complexity of modern commerce, and borderline questions relating to the taxing power, a municipality is certain to lose some revenue through tax and license escapes. Nevertheless, there are steps which a municipality may take to enforce its taxes and licenses that will limit those losses. Strict tax and license enforcement is the fairest license enforcement because it closes the door on the competitive advantage which escapees enjoy over others in the same license classification. Source: ALM Selected Readings for the Municipal Official Escapees Paid to Evade
  • Slide 41
  • The Hunt Examine Local Revenue authorizing document(s) Business License/Tax: If unable to adopt as tax, adopt as Fee for Revenue and Regulation Review all existing revenue sources for com- pliance, accuracy, reporting (including NPOs) Investigate business operations and transactions not registered or reported Identify properties with cell towers and equipment Develop list of advertising billboards: locations and type of ad copy Interdepartmental cooperation for finding/reporting unlicensed businesses and enforcement
  • Slide 42
  • The Hunt (continued) Work with Tax Assessor and Commissioner to inspect personal property tax records Develop understanding with DOR for liaison relationship for Sales and Use Tax, License, etc. Diligently pursue total compliance and maximum revenue yield from existing opportunities Cross check State, County, and City revenue databases Develop cost of services model to monitor development costs and associated fees and the desired level of recovery/subsidy Boots on the Ground
  • Slide 43
  • Seek Local Control of Revenues Push state governments to authorize local revenue generation ability to match operational expenses, mandates, and infrastructure costs Reform the fiscal architecture eliminate TELs, diversify and broaden the sales tax base, consider a sales tax on services Explore public-private and public-public partnerships to jointly provide services and share costs freeing up revenue for other uses Fiscal revenue reform focus on long-term rehab of finances and restoration of financial health Get serious about collection and enforcement
  • Slide 44
  • Conclusion - The Perfect Storm Took years to gather strength before hitting economies with unprecedented force in 2008 Recovery will be slow No quick fix Solutions within reach Time for collaboration and resilience like never before
  • Slide 45
  • A New Day For A New Wave
  • Slide 46
  • Sources National League of Cities National Conference of State Legislatures ICMA The Tax Foundation Janney Montgomery Scott U.S. Census Bureau Pew Center for Research The Economic Policy Institute National Association of State Budget Officials Governing National Association of Counties