Pin Fuse Joints

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Pin Fuse Joints

    1/7

    This copy is made for your private studyor for your research.The Copyright Act 1994 prohibits the sale,

  • 8/2/2019 Pin Fuse Joints

    2/7

    Top: Kobe Quake, Japan, Jan. 17,1995. Lower left : San Salvador Quake, EI Salvador, Oct. 10,1986. Lower right: Michoacan Quake, Mexico, Sept. 19,1985

    Pin -Fuse Jointus Pa tent No. 6,681,538 81Date of Patent: January 27, 2004

    Ensuring life safety in structures during and after a seismic event is an architect's and engineer's primary goal.How ever, the economic viability of structures followingthe eve nt is crucial to initial business investment decisions and long-term business successes. If structureswere capable of resisting potentially destructive earthquake forces while altering their characteristics withoutpermanent deformation, the structure would not only besafe but also economically superior.Structures designed and built in regions of high seismicity are conceived with juxtaposing criteria. They must bedesigned for strength, providing enough resistance toprotect life safety and avoid collapse. However, theymus t be designed economically, using inherent ductilityto dissipate energy by means of reasonably sized structural members. Traditionally, structural steel buildingfram es have utilized beam-to-column moment connection s that are welded with the frame beams perpendicular to the columns. Beams connected to the face ofcolumns rotate when subjected to racking of the buildingframe. These beams are designed to protect the columnintegrity and prevent potential collapse by plasticallydeforming during frame motion. This deformation, however, likely decreases post-earthquake integrity and economic viability in the process.Following the 1994 Northridge earthquake in California,designers, academicians, and building owners found theconventionally designed steel beam-to-columns momentconnections protected life safety but in many casesresulted in unsuccessful investment because of failedjoints (cracked welds, cracked steel sections, etc.) andpermanent building deformations. With future performance questionable and repairs difficult, the design andcon struction industry searched for more reliable solutions. Many solutions were proposed and developed.Some patents were awarded. These solutions variedfrom strongly reinforcing the beam-to-column joint withwelded plates to creating slots in the moment-resisting

    beam webs to reducing the flange sections oat the joint (The "Dogbane"). However, nosolutions addressed the fundamental behaveliminating plastic (permanent yielding) defoaddition, none addressed the natural rotatments of the joints that must provide resistaas must provide a controlled release of enforces are excessive.The Pin-Fuse JoinPMallows building movemby a seismic event while maintaining structuafter strong ground motion. The joint introdular-plated end connection for the steel beainto the steel or composite columns within resisting frame. Slip-critical friction-type bothe curved steel end plates. A steel pin orpipe in the center of the moment-frame beamwell-defined rotation point. Under typical setions including wind and moderate seismic joint remains fixed where applied forces dcome the friction resistance provided becurved end plates. However, during an extrthe joint is designed to rotate around the pithe slip-critical bolts sliding in long-slotted hcurved end plates. With this slip, rotationenergy dissipated, and "fusing" occurs.The rotation of the Pin-Fuse Joint durinseismic events occurs sequentially in desigtions within the frame. As the slip occurs,frame is softened. The dynamic characteriframe are altered with a lengthening of tperiod, less forces are attracted by the frame; inelastic deformation is realized. After the sethe elastic frame finds its pre-earthquake, tered position. The brass shim located bcurved steel plates provides a predictable cfriction required to determine the onset of slipthe bolts to maintain their tension and cthe clamping force after the earthquake has s

  • 8/2/2019 Pin Fuse Joints

    3/7

    Conventional structural steel momentresisting frame

    Conventional Beam-to-Column Joint(Pre-Northridge Connection)- Beam flanges fully welded and beam web boltedto column at joint;

    - limited ductility;- plastic (permanent) deformations expected

    after medium-level earthquake.

    70

    Dogbone or Reduced Beam Section( Post Northridge Connection)- Beam fully welded to column at joint with

    partial removal of beam flanges;- good ductility;- plastic (permanent) deformations expected

    after medium-level earthquake.

    ..... '-',--.-',... '.-. -.- .- .... I - -1 '.'.....-F ------, t. . ;; ., .\ 1' . . - - . . -\ t _

    t -..:-..I \- -Ioil __... I _ -,' .- --.:.--..... lbo&: .. ... . ....I

    Structural steel moment-resisting frameillustrating locations of the Pin-Fuse Joint '"

    Pin-Fuse Join!'"

    - Curved structural steel end plates bolted togetherwith friction connection;

    - pin placed in beam web to created center of rotation;- no plastic (permanent) deformations even after

    extreme seismic event.

    First concept sketch, Feb . 12,2002

  • 8/2/2019 Pin Fuse Joints

    4/7

    ---,J L

    L=[ [.[ .I U [ [ JI IConventional structural steel frame subjected to an earthquake

    ...............-J I ;;:..:o---iiiiiiiiiiiiiii_JI ;;-- _- -=&j] [S:=--'__

    rS- -=

    - - - - " " fL",- - - - - - = = - - ' ---Pin-Fu se Joint'" frame subjected to an earthquake

    72

    .-. I I 11---] ! J-- '- -,- -l ] t J - -l l I

    Steel frame compromised afte

    Steel frame in tact without permanent deformations afte

  • 8/2/2019 Pin Fuse Joints

    5/774

    rb.ArPHevMAfPLleOI _____ .f>cAI\ENDVA9fLIEIJ: V'JZAVlrr '+VSE1(t/11C,I ' 1 A " L l ~ l > < t - ' 1 " , ~ " ~ ' 1 ' f ! I ' \ S ( I ~ " " ~

    r l r J - f i J ' ~ : r o l ~ T WILL ONL(RoT liTE "'KEN . PLIE1>11",,01"''' rMMWT loJ f(l.lI1>ve TO ">el'1MI(; LOAVI,,-\6!1::::::JI' 11C" (,.l,PIt>.

  • 8/2/2019 Pin Fuse Joints

    6/7

    5

    b

    76

    c

    .. .... ..

    .. ..

    .. ..

    6a

    5 The Pin-Fuse Joint"' elastica lly designed fora 3% rotation at a 475-year seismic event

    6 Assembly and construction of the Pin-Fuse Jointn . Systema) Pre-fabricated column and beam unitsb) Fit-up unit and install brass shimsc) Install f l a n g ~ friction bolts and web pin

    \ ,d) Install mid-span beam sp lice in erected building frame7 Upwardly rotated position8 At-rest position9 Downwardly rotated position

    10 The Pin-Fuse Joint " 'model

    d

    7 8 9

  • 8/2/2019 Pin Fuse Joints

    7/7

    78

    (12) United States PatentSarkisian(54) SEISMIC STRUCTURAL DEVICE(75) Invenlor: Mark I'. Sa rkisian, San Anselmo, CA(US)(73) Assignee: Skidmo re, Owings & Merrill LLP ,New York, NY (US)(. ) NOlice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of thispatent is extended or adjusted under 35U.S.c. 154(b) by 1 day.(21) App!. No.: 10/200,679(22)(51)(52)(58)

    (56)

    Filed: Jul . 22, 2002Int. CI.7U.S. Cl.

    E04B 7/00.... 52/289; 521702; 52/167.1;52/283; 403/335; 403/337

    Field of Scarch ......................... 52/167.1,283,52/289,702,736 .2; 403/335,336,337,338,257,258,83,84,87; 248/250References Cited

    U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS3,938,294 A 2/19763,974,614 A 8/19764,041,659 A 8/ 19774,054,392 A 10/ 19774,091 ,594 A 5/19784,344,716 A 8/19824,348,129 A 9/ 19824,615,157 A 10/ 19864,658,556 A 4119874,779,484 A 10119884,781,003 A 11119884,922,667 A 5119904,928,930 A 5119905,319,907 A 6/19945,408,798 A 4119955,491 ,941 A 2/19965,537,790 A 711996

    32

    12

    GaburriStrong.McElhoc.

    52/7435215 7352/93.1...... 403/175..... 52/737.2.................... 403/13.............. . 403/218

    OppenheimYamashitaSigal ..Confort iMurray.Jenkins.Poe.Rizza

    .. 52/167.452/3 1774/60852/396Kobori et al. ................ 52/167Chung. 256/67Nicholas et al. ......... 52/396.05HohmannL,ncelot, III .Jackson.

    Ii.I

    52/562....... 52/223.952/393

    26 - -11=2132

    111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111US006681538Bl(10) Patent No.: US 6,681,538 BlJan. 27, 200445) Date of Patent:

    ,I .\ ,5,797,227 A 811998 ' Garla-Ta mez ............. 521167. 15,875,598 A 311999 Balten el al. 52/396.Ql6,10 1 780 A 8/2000 Kreidl ....................... '52/7126,102 ,627 A 8/2000 Veda el al ................. 40512556,115,972 A 9/2000 Tamez ....................... 52/167.46,185,897 Hl 2/2001 Jollllson el al. ......... 52/583.16,237 ,292 III 5/2001 Ilegcmier el al. .. 5212736,289,640 Bl 912001 Veda el al. ................ 521167.96,324,795 Bl 12/2001 Sliles el al. ................ 52/ 167.4200110045069 Al 1112001 Conslanlinou ............. 521167.32002/0184836 Al 1212002 '[;,kclichi el al.

    * cited by examinerPrhnmy Examiner-Ca rl D. rricdmanAssislallf Examhler---NahidAmiri(74) A f l O r l l e ) AgellfJ or Firm-Sonnenschcin, Nalb &Rosenlhal LLP(57) ABSTRACTThe present invention is a pin-fuse joint generally utili zed ina beam-to-columnjoint assembly subject to extreme seismicloading. The pin-fuse joint resists bending moments andshears generated by these loads. The joint is comp rised ofstandard structural stee l building materials, but may beapplied to structure s comprisedof s tructural steel, reinforcedconcrete, and or composite materials, e.g., a combination ofs tructura l steel and reinforced concrete. The bcam-tocolumn assembly is comprised of a column and a beam anda plate assembly that extends betwcen the column and thebeam. TIle platc assembly is we lded to the co lumn and isattached to the beam via the pio-fuse oin t. The pin fuse jointis created by a pin connection througb the beam and theconnec tion plates of the pla le as.o;;ern bly at the web of thebeam. Addilionally, bOlh Ihe plale assembly and Ihe beamhave cu rved flange end connectors that sit flu sh against oneanother sepa rated only by a brass shim when th e beam andplate assembly arc joined. The curved flange end connectorsof the beam and plate assembly arc then secured against oneanolher by torqued high-slrenglh bolts.

    13 Claims, 7 DJ'3wing Sheets

    24

    ------I.

    FIG.

    26

    FIG. 8

    / '032

    36 - ' ~ l

    FIG. 10

    24

    -

    2

    \616 14I: I ;V I ;V I I;V30I8 _ :1!22 'i 25-=- 1!!t -36 ~ H ~ = IFIG, 4 FIG. 5

    i12

    32

    FIG,FIG. 1 Perspective view of oneembodiment of a beam-to-co lumnjoint assemblyFIG. 2 Exploded front view ofbeam-to-column joint assemblyFIG. 2a Front view of a pipe/pinassembly and web stiffener usedto connect the moment-resistingbeam to the plate assemblyFIG. 3 Exploded top view ofbeam-to-column joint assemblyFIG. 4 Cross sectional view ofplate assembly (Fig. 2) takenalong line A-AFIG. 5 Cross sectional view ofplate assembly (Fig. 2) takenalong line B-B

    66

    FIG . 6

    Ii.

    I 26

    9FIG. 6 Cross sectionmoment-resisting beataken along line C-CFIG. 7 Cross sectionmoment-resisting beataken along line 0-0FIG . 8 Front view of embodiment of beamjoint assemblyFIG . 9 Top view of oment of beam-to-coluassemblyFIG . 10 Perspective beam-to-column jointit would appear withrotated when subjectloading cond itions