13
PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 1 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh Murauskas and Joe Miller January 27, 2015

PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 1

Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia

Presented by

Josh Murauskas and Joe MillerJanuary 27, 2015

Page 2: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 2

• Over 130 facilities

• Outdated agreements

Columbia R. Hatcheries

Columbia R. Chinook hatchery releases (from Levin et al. 2001)

Page 3: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 3

The Concept of Salmon Mitigation

Pre-project Unavoidable loss Mitigation Post-project

Page 4: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 4

Page 5: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 5

• Juvenile survival = 93%

• Returns = 46,500 wild fish

– Shortage of 3,500 adults

• Hatchery SAR = 0.5%

• 700,000 smolts to mitigate loss

Example Mitigation Calculation using PITs

Page 6: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 6

Example Baseline Estimates

Nego-tiated

SARs Carrying capacity

Egg-smolt Smolt trap pHOS -

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

Spring Chinook

Steelhead

An

nu

al sm

olt

pro

du

cti

on

6

Page 7: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 7

What is Fish Performance?

• Juvenile survival

• Smolt-to-adult returns

• Age structure

– All estimable with PITs

Page 8: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 8

Example Comparison of Programs

• 700,000 smolts

• 0.5% SAR

• 20% Age 3 returns

• 2,800 Age 4+ adults

• 400,000 smolts

• 1.3% SAR

• 10% Age 3 Returns

• 4,680 Age 4+ adults

Page 9: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 9

Age Structure (Chelan River, BY 2008)

n = 107 n = 175

Page 10: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 10

Reminder of PIT Infrastructure

Page 11: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 11

• Reduced phenotypic discrepancies with wild fish

• Minimized hatchery footprint

• Maximize value of dollar invested

• Improved nurture to meet nature’s design

Incentive-based Hatchery Programs

Page 12: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 12

• Mitigation should involve calculation of:

– The size of the pie

– How best to replace your piece

• By improving mitigation strategies, we can

enhance harvest and conservation programs

• Our PIT infrastructure a great backbone

Summary

Page 13: PIT Technology and Hatchery Mitigation J. Murauskas and J. Miller 0 Use of PIT technology to improve hatchery mitigation in the Columbia Presented by Josh

PIT Technology and Hatchery MitigationJ. Murauskas and J. Miller 13

[email protected]