Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cambium Inc.
P.O. Box 325 52 Hunter Street East, Peterborough Ontario, K9H 1G5
Telephone: (866) 217.7900 Facsimile: (705) 742.7907
cambium-inc.com
Planning Noise Impact Study, Concession 3 Part of Lot 18, Brock Road, Pickering
Cambium Reference No.: 7419-001
Prepared for: 2184107 Ontario Inc.
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page i
VERSION CONTROL
Revision Date Revision Description Reviewer
Initials
1.0 2018-05-22 Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering RS Coatings
TMC
2.0 2018-08-16 Update for new site plan TMC
2.1 2018-09-10 Update Client Name TMC
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Cambium Inc. was retained by 2184107 Ontario Inc., to complete a Noise Impact Study for the proposed mixed-
use development at Concession 3 Part of Lot 18, Brock Road, Pickering with respect to potential road noise from
Brock Road, and to potential rail noise and vibration impacts from the CP Rail line that lies north of the property.
This study was completed in response to a request by the City of Pickering for a noise and vibration study, and to
the CP rail requirements due the proposed development being within a 300 metre noise zone of influence of the
rail line. This report has confirmed that a vibration study is not required due to the site being located outside the
75 metre vibration zone of influence published by CP Rail.
Cambium Inc. assessed the impacts from the road and rail line on the proposed development based on applicable
guidelines such as the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks document NPC-300 Environmental
Noise Guideline Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning, the guideline document
prepared for The Railway Association of Canada and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities titled Guidelines
for New Development in Proximity to Railway Operations, and the CP Rail Principal Main Line Requirements.
Cambium Inc. collected rail traffic data from Canadian Pacific Railway to calculate noise impacts using the
Ministry of the Environmental calculation method Sound from Trains Environmental Analysis Method considering
current rail traffic volumes and estimated future volumes.
The results of the measured and calculated noise impacts were assessed against applicable guidelines to assess
the potential impact on residential dwellings.
The result of the assessment show that the combined rail and road noise impacts at the rooftop outdoor living
area exceed the 55 dBA criterion but remain below the 60 dBA limit. The assessment indicates meeting 55 dBA
is not likely to be economically feasible. Therefore, a warning clause may be provided to prospective buyers
warning them of the potential for elevated noise levels in the event that implementation of noise controls is not
feasible.
Recommendations were provided for various sound transmission class requirements for window assemblies, as
well the provision of central air conditioning for the majority of the building in order to achieve the sound level
criteria for indoor living areas, together with warning clauses to prospective buyers warning them of the potential
for elevated noise levels.
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................ 2
3.0 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA ...................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 ROAD AND RAIL NOISE ......................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 RAIL VIBRATION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 ROAD VIBRATION .................................................................................................................................. 4
4.0 NOISE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................................................ 5
5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 6 5.1 OUTDOOR LIVING SPACES .................................................................................................................. 6 5.2 BUILDING FAÇADE NOISE IMPACTS ................................................................................................... 6
6.0 CONCLUDING COMMENTS ................................................................................................................... 8
REFERENCES
LIST OF APPENDED FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Location Map
LIST OF APPENDED TABLES
Table 1 Results Summary Table 2 STC Calculations
Table 3 Noise Control Summary
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Rail and Road Traffic Data Requests
Appendix B Steam and Ornament Outputs Appendix C Site Plan
Appendix D Noise Impact Warning Clauses
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Cambium Inc. (Cambium) was retained by 2184107 Ontario Inc. to complete a Noise Impact Study for the
proposed new mixed-use development at Concession 3 Part of Lot 18, Brock Road, Pickering (the Site) with
respect to potential road noise from Brock Road, and to potential rail noise impacts from the CP Rail line that lies
north of the property. This study was completed in response to a request by the City of Pickering for a noise
study, and to the CP rail requirements due the proposed development being within a 300 metre noise zone of
influence of the rail line. A vibration study is not required due to the site being located outside the 75 metre
vibration zone of influence this was confirmed with CP rail staff.
Cambium assessed the impacts from the road and rail line on the proposed development based on applicable
guidelines such as the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks (MECP) document NPC-300
Environmental Noise Guideline Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning (Ontario Ministry
of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks, 2017), the guideline document prepared for The Railway
Association of Canada and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities titled Guidelines for New Development in
Proximity to Railway Operations (Railway Association of Canada and Federation of Canadian Municipalities,
2013), and the CP Rail Principal Main Line Requirements. (CP Rail).
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page 2
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed development is new mixed-use development located at Concession 3 Part of Lot 18, Brock Road,
Pickering. The site includes one (1) mixed commercial and residential building at 6 floors in height total, with
underground and at grade parking. The Site fronts onto Brock Road and is adjacent to existing and proposed
residential development. Surrounding land uses are predominantly residential, with proposed commercial use
across Brock road to the west.
The CP Rail mainline is located approximately 200 metres (m) north of the Site, which runs east to west. The
nearest road crossing is an overpass of Brock Road, approximately 200 metres (m) north of the Site.
A site location plan showing nearby transportation noise sources in included as Figure 1.
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page 3
3.0 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
3.1 ROAD AND RAIL NOISE
The criteria for acceptable levels of noise at residential developments due to road and rail traffic are provided in
the MECP’s NPC-300 guidance document. The recommended criteria for rail and road noise impacts for different
residential impacts are included in the table below.
Road and Rail Noise Criteria
Type of Space Sound Level Criteria (dBA, Leq)
07:00 to 23:00 23:00 to 07:00 Road Rail Road Rail
Outdoor Living Area 55 (combined)
- -
Living/Dining/Den Areas of Residence Indoor 45 40 45 40
Sleeping Quarters Indoor 45 40 40 35
The NPC-300 guideline defines an outdoor living area (OLA) as part of a noise sensitive land use (e.g. residential
dwelling) that is intended and designed for the quiet enjoyment of the outdoor environment, and is readily
accessible from the building. In the context of low rise developments, examples of OLAs include balconies with a
minimum depth of 4 m, terraces, and common OLAs such as shared terraces, yards, or gardens. In the case of
this development there are no balconies or terraces large enough, the OLA is defined as the shared rooftop patio.
The OLA sound levels are determined from the combination of both road and rail sources.
If the 16-hour equivalent sound level (Leq (16)) for an OLA is greater than 55 dBA and less than or equal to 60 dBA,
then noise control measures may be applied to reduce the sound level to 55 dBA, or, if noise control measures
are not applied, then prospective purchasers or tenants should be informed of potential noise concerns by a
warning clause (Type A as defined in NPC-300).
If the Leq (16) for an OLA is greater than 60 dBA, then noise control measures should be applied to reduce the
sound level to 55 dBA. In cases where noise control measures are not feasible for technical, economic, or
administrative purposes, then an excess above the 55 dBA limit is acceptable with a warning clause (Type A as
defined in NPC-300); however, excesses above 60 dBA are not acceptable.
For indoor living areas and sleeping quarters, the sound level criteria are used to determine transmission loss
requirements for the building façade based on the predicted sound level at the plane of a window. If the Leq (16)
daytime sound level in the plane of a window is less than or equal to 55 dBA, then typical façade constructions
are generally sufficient to achieve the indoor sound level criteria, and additional noise controls may not be
required. If the sound level in the plane of a window is greater than 55 dBA and less than or equal to 65 dBA,
then the dwelling should be designed with a provision for the installation of central air conditioning in the future, at
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page 4
the occupant’s discretion, and prospective purchasers or tenants should be informed of potential noise concerns
by a warning clause (Type C as defined in NPC-300).
If the daytime Leq (16) in the plane of a window is greater than 65 dBA, installation of central air conditioning should
be implemented, and prospective purchasers or tenants should be informed of potential noise concerns by a
warning clause (Type D as defined in NPC-300). Additionally, building façade components should be designed
so that the indoor sound level criterion can be achieved when doors and windows are closed.
Note that the provision for central air conditioning is to allow the occupant to keep windows and doors closed if
desired to achieve a quiet indoor acoustic environment.
As the site is within 300 metres of the CP rail line, a general warning clause should be used to inform prospective
purchasers or tenants of potential noise concerns.
3.2 RAIL VIBRATION
A vibration study is not required due to the site being located outside the 75 metre vibration zone of influence.
3.3 ROAD VIBRATION
Due to the nature of vehicles, with pneumatic tires and suspension systems, it is generally accepted that road
traffic will not be a significant source of vibration.
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page 5
4.0 NOISE ASSESSMENT
The noise assessment was conducted using predictive calculations of road and rail noise developed by the
MECP: Ontario Road Noise Analysis Method for Environment and Transportation (ORNAMENT) (Ontario Ministry
of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks, 1999), and Sound from Trains Environmental Analysis Method
(STEAM) (Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks, 1999).
Noise impacts were assessed at upper storey plane of window (POW) receptor locations, and at the outdoor living
area (OLA) located on the shared rooftop patio.
• POW – Plane of window receptor representative of the worst case exposure on each side of the proposed
development;
• OLA – Outdoor living area receptor located on the shared rooftop patio;
Based on observations and measurements at the Site, local road noise does contribution to local noise levels.
Traffic data used for the road noise assessment was obtained from data provided by the Regional Municipality of
Durham. In relation to development planning, Brock Road should be considered to have a forecasted Annual
Average Daily Traffic count of 40000, with 5.25% medium sized trucks, and 9.75% heavy trucks. The City of
Ottawa recommended day/night split of 92.5%/7.5% for arterial roads was used.
Rail traffic data was provided by CP Rail. The maximum values were used in the calculation. Future traffic
volumes were predicted using a growth of 2.5% of traffic per year for 10 years.
Traffic data requests and responses are provided in Appendix A. STEAM and ORNAMENT calculations are
provided in Appendix B.
The results of the assessment show rooftop OLA noise levels of approximately 60 dBA, and plane of window
noise levels of between 60 dBA and 75 dBA depending on their location on the building. Details are provided in
Table 1 Results Summary, and are discussed in section 5.0.
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page 6
5.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 OUTDOOR LIVING SPACES
The shared rooftop patio is defined as the OLA for this multi-unit residential building. The noise impact form
combined road and rail is predicted to exceed the 55 dBA criterion but remain below the 60 dBA limit provided
that the rooftop patio is situated on the east side of the building such that west building facade will protect the
outdoor living areas from the noise impact of the road below. Additional noise reduction may be achieved by
providing screening with a building parapet or other rooftop features and barriers. The noise impacts of the road
and of the rail contribute fairly equally to the impacts at the OLA.
Within this noise impact range, it is recommended that options to provide noise reductions be explored such as
positioning of the OLA; however, if noise reduction is determined to be unfeasible, then a warning clause should
be provided to prospective buyers, informing them of the potential for increased noise impacts. The
recommended warning clause Type A is included in Appendix D.
Note that based on the road noise impact results Cambium does not believe that it is feasible to meet 55 dBA or
60 dBA noise limits with any outdoor areas at grade. Basic calculations indicate at the applicable distance, a
barrier of 7.5 m in elevation would be required. Therefore it is recommended that the design continue to define
the shared rooftop patio as the OLA. The only technically feasible way to ensure an OLA at grade, would be to
re-arrange the site so that the building could screen a public green space from the roadway. Given the needs of
the development, this is not seen to be feasible. Furthermore Cambium would suspect that the municipal
authority would not authorize the use of a 7.5 m barrier in this case, most zoning bylaws and fence bylaws restrict
this type of construction.
5.2 BUILDING FAÇADE NOISE IMPACTS
Noise impacts calculated at the building façade are used to estimate façade requirements to achieve the indoor
noise criteria. In in order to determine the worst-case façade requirements, the method outlined in the National
Research Council Canada Publication: Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings (Quirt, 1985) was used.
The results of Cambium’s analysis indicate that the 24 hour Leq at the plane of window exceeds 60 dBA (75 dBA
daytime, 69 dBA nighttime). The indoor living areas noise limits are defined in section 3.1.
Note that as per NPC-300 and the predicted rail and road traffic levels, air conditioning must be provided for
receptors on the north, south and west side of the building. The east side receptors must be constructed with the
provision for air conditioning to be installed however it is not strictly required to be installed.
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page 7
Windows must be selected based on acoustic design considerations on all sides of the building, Cambium has
completed basic selection calculations however during detailed building design calculations should be refined
based on window/wall area. Specific STC rating recommendations are provided in Table 2.
Finally all units will require warning clauses on the deeds as outlined in Table 3.
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc. Page 9
REFERENCES
Bies, D. A. (2003). Engineering Noise Control Theory and Practice. New York: Spon Press.
CP Rail. (n.d.). Principal Main Line Requirements.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks. (1999). ORNAMENT Ontario Road Noise Analysis
Method for Environment and Transportation.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks. (1999). STEAM Sound from Trains Environmental
Analysis Method.
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, and Parks. (2017). NPC-300 - Environmental Noise Guideline
Stationary and Transportation Sources - Approval and Planning.
Quirt, J. D. (1985). Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings. NRC Publications Archive.
Railway Association of Canada and Federation of Canadian Municipalities. (2013). Guidelines for New
Development in Proximity to Railway Operations.
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc.
Appended Figures
P.O. Box 325, 52 Hunter Street EastPeterborough, Ontario, K9H 1G5Tel: (705) 742.7900 Fax: (705) 742.7907www.cambium-inc.comLake Ontario(lac Ontario)
Petticoat C
re
ek
Brougham
Cre
ek
Ganats
ekiagon Creek
Major Creek
Urfé
Cre
ek
Michell Cree
k
Lyn
de
Cree
k
Re
eso
rCree
k
West
Duffin
sC
reek
Wes t DuffinsC
reek
Little Rouge Cre
ek
YO
RK
DU
RH
AM
LIN
E
MCLEVIN AV E
BAYLY ST E
MORNING
SIDE
AV
E
WE
STN
EY
RD
S
NE
ILS
ON
RD
KINGSTON RD W
CO
CH
RA
NE
ST
KINGSTON RD E
RA
VE
NS
CR
OF
TR
D
ROSSLAND RD W
SHEPPARDAVE E
KIN
GSTO
NRD
AU
DLE
YRD
S
LIV
ER
PO
OL
RD
ALT
ON
A R
D
PIC
KE
RIN
G
PKY
BA
LD
WIN
ST
S
LA
KE
DRWY W
FINCH AVE
CH
UR
CH
ST
S
SHEPPARD AVE
WH
ITE
SR
D
BR
OC
K R
D
KIN
SA
LE
RD
CH
UR
CH
ST
N
SALE
M
RD
S
M URISO
N
B LVD
BRAY
MOREBLVD
BR
OC
KRD
WE
ST
NE
YR
DN
3RD CON RD
TAUNTON RD W
ME
AD
OW
VALE
RD
MCQU
AY
BLV
D
DE
LANEYDR
BE
AR
E R
D
CO
UN
TRYLA
NE
FA
IRP
OR
T R
D
WHITEVALE RD
AS
HB
UR
NR
D
RE
ES
OR
RD
C
HAPMAN DR
NO
RT
H R
D
DIX
IE R
D
HA
RW
OO
DA
VE
S
H
ARWOO
DA
VE
N
LA
KE
RID
GE
RD
WE
ST
NE
Y R
D
16TH AVE
AU
DLE
Y R
D N
STEELES AVE E
CO
RO
NA
TIO
NR
D
SA
LEMRD
N
ROSSLAND RD E
RO
SE
BA
NK
RD
SE
WE
LLS
RD
DUNDAS ST W
6TH CON RD
TW
YNR
IVERS DR
SH
OA
L P
OIN
T R
D
5TH CON RD
TAUNTON RD
SC
AR
BO
RO
UG
H P
ICK
ER
ING
TLIN
E
OLD FINCH AVE
GR
EEN
WO
OD
RD
VICTORIA ST W
BAYLY
ST
TAUNTON RD E
SA
ND
Y B
EA
CH
RD
8TH CON RD
9TH CON RD
SLIN
E 2
8
LA
KE
RID
GE
RD
N
14TH AVE
HA
LLS
RD
N
KERR ISON DR EF
INLE
YA
VE
PIN
EG
R
OVE
AVE
SLIN
E 1
4
MO
NA
RC
HAVE
SLIN
E 2
0
M
AJ
OR
O
AKS
RD
SPR
UC
EH
ILL
RD
7TH CON RD
SQ
UIR
ES
BE
AC
H R
D
7TH CON RD
11T
H C
ON
C
LA
KE
RID
GE
RD
S
8TH CON RD
SLIN
E 4
SA
LE
M R
D4TH CON RD
SLIN
E 3
0
SLIN
E 6
HA
LLS
RD
S
SLIN
E 1
2
SLIN
E 2
4
SLIN
E 3
2
SLIN
E 1
6
SLIN
E 2
6
SLIN
E 2
2
SANO
K
DR
HILLS
RD
���
407
���12
���7
���401
���401
���407
���412
Pickering
Locust
Hill
Glen
Grove
Green
River
Brougham
Cedar
Grove
Coronation
Gardens
Dunbarton
Ajax
Squires
Beach
Pickering
Beach
Rosebank
Liverpool
Whitevale
Riverside
June 20181:100,000 Figure:Created by: Checked by:Date:Project No.:Scale: Projection:NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N
º
0 1 2 3 4 5
km
Highway
Major Road
Minor Road
Railroad
Watercourse
Water Area
Built-Up Area
Wooded Area
LEGEND
SITE
Rev.:
O:\
GIS
\pro
ject_
MX
Ds\7
400
-74
99
\74
19
-00
1 R
S C
oating
s -
Multip
le S
erv
ice
s -
Bro
ck R
oad
Deve
lop
men
t P
ickeri
ng
\201
8-0
6-0
1 F
IG 1
- R
egio
nal Lo
ca
tion P
lan.m
xd
CPM7419-001 NJY 1111
REGIONAL LOCATION PLANNotes:
- Base mapping features are © Queen's Printer of Ontario, 2017 (this doesnot constitute an endorsement by the Ministry of Natural Resources or theOntario Government).- Distances on this plan are in metres and can be converted to feet bydividing by 0.3048.- Cambium Inc. makes every effort to ensure this map is free from errors butcannot be held responsible for any damages due to error or omissions. Thismap should not be used for navigation or legal purposes. It is intended forgeneral reference use only.
PHASE ONE PHASE ONE PHASE ONE PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTSITE ASSESSMENTSITE ASSESSMENTSITE ASSESSMENT2184107 ONTARIO INC.Concession 3, Part of Lot 18, Brock Road, Pickering, Ontario
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc.
Appended Tables
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
Table 1 Noise Prediction Results
Road Rail Combined Controls Road Rail Combined Controls
OLA 56.6 57.0 59.8 WC A - - -POW - South 72.4 60.0 72.6 WC D + Install AC + STC 64.5 62.2 66.5 WC A + WC D + Install AC + STCPOW - East 60.4 48.0 60.6 WC C + Design AC + STC 52.5 50.2 54.5 WC A + WC C + Design AC + STCPOW - North 72.4 60.0 72.6 WC D + Install AC + STC 64.5 62.2 66.5 WC A + WC D + Install AC + STCPOW - West 75.4 63.0 75.6 WC D + Install AC + STC 67.5 65.2 69.5 WC A + WC D + Install AC + STC
Rail noise based on max daily time period counts provided by CP rail with forcasted growth of 2.5% for 10 years
23:00 to 07:00Receptor
Road noise based on traffic forcast provided by the Regional Municipality of Durham, 92.5% day:night split.Note - Predicted Levels for side windows and rear windows based on MOECC assumption of 3 dB reduction for side walls and 15 dB reduction for rear
Noise Impact (dBA, Leq)07:00 to 23:00
Table 1 - Results Summary
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
Table 2a: Required STC Calculations (BPN 56 Calculation) notes - North, West, South Facing Facades
Day Time Sound LevelUnits
Outdoor Sound Level 75.6 dBAFree Field Correction 3 dBARequired Indoor Sound Level 40 dBARequired Reduction 38.6 dBA
Incident Sound Angle 0-90 degreesAngle Correction Factor (BPN 56) 0 dB BPN 56 Table 2
Percentage of Transmission Wall 10 %10 dB BPN 56 Table 3
Percentage of Transmission Window 90 %0.5 dB BPN 56 Table 3
Transmission Calculations (assumed dimensions)
Wall Percent of floor 50.00% assumed
Window Percent of floor 50.00% assumed
Room Absorption HardRoom Correction - Wall -2 dB BPN 56 Table 4Room Correction - Window -2 dB BPN 56 Table 4
Spectrum type E BPN 56 Figure 1Component Category d BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Wall 9 dB BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Window 6 dB BPN 56 Table 5
Min Required STC Rating Wall 56Min Required STC Rating Window 43
Table 2a - STC W75
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
Nighttime Sound LevelUnits
Outdoor Sound Level 69.5 dBAFree Field Correction 3 dBARequired Indoor Sound Level 35 dBARequired Reduction 37.5 dBA
Incident Sound Angle 0-90 degreesAngle Correction Factor (BPN 56) 0 dB BPN 56 Table 2
Percentage of Transmission Wall 10 %10 dB BPN 56 Table 3
Percentage of Transmission Window 90 %0.5 dB BPN 56 Table 3
Transmission Calculations (assumed dimensions)
Wall Percent of floor 50.00% assumed
Window Percent of floor 50.00% assumed
Room Absorption HardRoom Correction - Wall -2 dB BPN 56 Table 4Room Correction - Window -2 dB BPN 56 Table 4
Spectrum type E BPN 56 Figure 1Component Category d BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Wall 9 dB BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Window 6 dB
Min Required STC Rating Wall 54Min Required STC Rating Window 42
- Calculation process based on National Research Council Canada Publication: Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings (Quirt, J. David) 1985
Table 2a - STC W75
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
Table 2b: Required STC Calculations (BPN 56 Calculation) notes - East Facing Facades
Day Time Sound LevelUnits
Outdoor Sound Level 60.6 dBAFree Field Correction 3 dBARequired Indoor Sound Level 40 dBARequired Reduction 23.6 dBA
Incident Sound Angle 0-90 degreesAngle Correction Factor (BPN 56) 0 dB BPN 56 Table 2
Percentage of Transmission Wall 50 %3 dB BPN 56 Table 3
Percentage of Transmission Window 50 %3 dB BPN 56 Table 3
Transmission Calculations (assumed dimensions)
Wall Percent of floor 11.82%
Window Percent of floor 19.09%
Room Absorption IntermediateRoom Correction - Wall -8 dB BPN 56 Table 4Room Correction - Window -6 dB BPN 56 Table 4
Spectrum type E BPN 56 Figure 1Component Category d BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Wall 9 dB BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Window 6 dB
Min Required STC Rating Wall 28Min Required STC Rating Window 27
Table 2b - STC W60
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
Nighttime Sound LevelUnits
Outdoor Sound Level 54.5 dBAFree Field Correction 3 dBARequired Indoor Sound Level 35 dBARequired Reduction 22.5 dBA
Incident Sound Angle 0-90 degreesAngle Correction Factor (BPN 56) 0 dB BPN 56 Table 2
Percentage of Transmission Wall 50 %3 dB BPN 56 Table 3
Percentage of Transmission Window 50 %3 dB BPN 56 Table 3
Transmission Calculations (assumed dimensions)
Wall Percent of floor 11.82%
Window Percent of floor 19.09%
Room Absorption IntermediateRoom Correction - Wall -8 dB BPN 56 Table 4Room Correction - Window -6 dB BPN 56 Table 4
Spectrum type E BPN 56 Figure 1Component Category d BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Wall 9 dB BPN 56 Table 5Frequency correction - Window 6 dB
Min Required STC Rating Wall 26Min Required STC Rating Window 25
- Calculation process based on National Research Council Canada Publication: Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings (Quirt, J. David) 1985
Table 2b - STC W60
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
Table 3 Summary of Noise Controls
OLA (all units)
POW - North
POW - East
POW - South
POW - West
Recommended Implement Warning Clause A for all units.
Recommended implement Warning Clause D, design and construct with air conditioning included, exterior façade, windows, and doors must have STC design requirements
met.Recommended implement Warning Clause C, design and
construct building to allow for the installation of air conditioning, exterior façade, windows, and doors must
have STC design requirements met.
Recommended implement Warning Clause D, design and construct with air conditioning included, exterior façade, windows, and doors must have STC design requirements
met.
Recommended implement Warning Clause D, design and construct with air conditioning included, exterior façade, windows, and doors must have STC design requirements
met.
Table 3 - Noise Controls
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc.
Appendix A
Rail and Road Traffic Data Requests
ROAD SEGMENT TRAFFIC FORECASTS FOR NOISE ANALYSES
This information is to be used as the basis for assessing the potential impacts of noise, generated by traffic on Provincial Highways and arterial roads, on proposed land uses that are sensitive (e.g., residential subdivisions). Arterial roads include existing and future Type A, B and C, as designated in the Durham Regional Official Plan.
Noise assessment reports recommend specific measures to be integrated into the design of sensitive developments to reduce road noise impacts to acceptable levels.
The Regional Municipality of Durham
Planning and Economic Development Department
Planning Division
605 ROSSLAND RD. E.4TH FLOORP.O. BOX 623WHITBY, ON L1N 6A3CANADA905-668-77111-800-372-1102Fax: 905-666-6208E-Mail: [email protected]
www.durham.ca
Commissioner of Planning andEconomic Development
Brian Bridgeman, MCIP, RPP
Trevor Copeland, Cambrium Inc.
P.O. Box 325, Peterborough, ON K9H 1G5
(705) 742-7900
Brock Road, north of Rex Heath Drive.Please note that future widening to 6 lanes is planned for curbside HOV lanes.
Pickering
April-20-18
April-25-18
Chris Leitch
Brock Road, south of Taunton Road
40,000 6 15 65 35 60
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Provided For:
Name / Name of Firm:
Address:
Telephone: Fax:
Location of Proposal:
Lot(s): Concession:Municipality:
Durham Region File No. (if available):
Name of Property Owner (if available):
Date Request Received: Received By:
Date Forecast Sent:
Name of Road Segment Forecasted AADT*
No. of Lanes
% of Trucks
Heavy : Medium Truck Ratio
Speed (km/h)
* Average Annual Daily Traffic. Forecast based on ultimate development according to the Durham Regional Official Plan.
April-25-18 Page 1 of 1
T 905 803 3429E [email protected]
800 - 1290 Central ParkwayWestMississauga, OntarioCanada L5C 4R3
April 10, 2018
Via email: [email protected]
Trevor CopelandCambium Inc.52 Hunter Street EastP.O. Box 325Peterborough, Ontario K9H 1G5
Dear Sir/Madam:
Re: Rail Traffic Volumes, CP Mileage 186.78, Belleville Subdivision,Brock Road south of Taunton Road
This is in reference to your request for rail traffic data in the vicinity of Brock Road in the City ofPickering. The study area is located at mile 186.78 of our Belleville Subdivision, which is classified as aPrincipal Main line.
The information requested is as follows:
1. Number of freight trains between 0700 & 2300: 6Number of freight trains between 2300 & 0700: 5
2. Average number of cars per train: 88Maximum cars per train freight: 196
3. Number of locomotives per train: 2 (4 Maximum)
4. Maximum permissible train speed is 60 miles per hour (freight)
5. There are no grade crossings through the study area, however, the whistle may be sounded ifdeemed necessary by the train crew for safety reasons.
6. There is one mainline track at his location and a rail bridge over Brock Road which may causemore than normal noise.
The information provided is based on recent rail traffic. Variations of the above may exist on a day-to-day basis. Specific measurements may also vary significantly depending on customer needs.
Yours truly,
Josie Tomei SR/WASpecialist Real Estate Sales & Acquisitions – Ontario
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc.
Appendix B
Steam and Ornament Outputs
RD1 at 15mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 14-08-2018 15:13:31MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT
Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: RD1 at 15m
Road data, segment # 1: (day/night)------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 31450/2550 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 1943/157 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 3608/292 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)
* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:
24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 40000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 5.25 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 9.75 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.50
Data for Segment # 1: (day/night)----------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 mReceiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)Reference angle : 0.00
Results segment # 1: (day)---------------------------
Source height = 1.77 m
ROAD (0.00 + 74.54 + 0.00) = 74.54 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.65 75.98 0.00 0.00 -1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 74.54----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 74.54 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 74.54 dBA
Results segment # 1: (night)-----------------------------
Source height = 1.77 m
ROAD (0.00 + 66.63 + 0.00) = 66.63 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.65 68.08 0.00 0.00 -1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 66.63----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 66.63 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 66.63 dBA
TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 74.54 (NIGHT): 66.63
Page 1
RD6 at 15mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 14-08-2018 15:14:48MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT
Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: RD6 at 15m
Road data, segment # 1: (day/night)------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 31450/2550 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 1943/157 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 3608/292 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)
* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:
24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 40000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 5.25 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 9.75 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.50
Data for Segment # 1: (day/night)----------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 15.00 / 15.00 mReceiver height : 16.50 / 16.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)Reference angle : 0.00
Results segment # 1: (day)---------------------------
Source height = 1.77 m
ROAD (0.00 + 75.44 + 0.00) = 75.44 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.20 75.98 0.00 0.00 -0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.44----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 75.44 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 75.44 dBA
Results segment # 1: (night)-----------------------------
Source height = 1.77 m
ROAD (0.00 + 67.53 + 0.00) = 67.53 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.20 68.08 0.00 0.00 -0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 67.53----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 67.53 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 67.53 dBA
TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 75.44 (NIGHT): 67.53
Page 1
RD7 OLA 18mb at 27mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 14-08-2018 15:22:47MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT
Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: RD7 OLA 18mb at 27m
Road data, segment # 1: (day/night)------------------------------------Car traffic volume : 31450/2550 veh/TimePeriod *Medium truck volume : 1943/157 veh/TimePeriod *Heavy truck volume : 3608/292 veh/TimePeriod *Posted speed limit : 60 km/hRoad gradient : 0 %Road pavement : 1 (Typical asphalt or concrete)
* Refers to calculated road volumes based on the following input:
24 hr Traffic Volume (AADT or SADT): 40000 Percentage of Annual Growth : 0.00 Number of Years of Growth : 0.00 Medium Truck % of Total Volume : 5.25 Heavy Truck % of Total Volume : 9.75 Day (16 hrs) % of Total Volume : 92.50
Data for Segment # 1: (day/night)----------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 27.00 / 27.00 mReceiver height : 19.50 / 19.50 mTopography : 2 (Flat/gentle slope; with barrier)Barrier angle1 : -90.00 deg Angle2 : 90.00 degBarrier height : 18.00 mBarrier receiver distance : 15.00 / 15.00 mSource elevation : 0.00 mReceiver elevation : 0.00 mBarrier elevation : 0.00 mReference angle : 0.00
Results segment # 1: (day)---------------------------
Source height = 1.77 m
Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.77 ! 19.50 ! 9.65 ! 9.65
ROAD (0.00 + 56.61 + 0.00) = 56.61 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.00 75.98 0.00 -2.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 -16.83 56.61----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 56.61 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 56.61 dBA
Results segment # 1: (night)-----------------------------
Source height = 1.77 m
Barrier height for grazing incidence------------------------------------Source ! Receiver ! Barrier ! Elevation ofHeight (m) ! Height (m) ! Height (m) ! Barrier Top (m)------------+-------------+-------------+-------------- 1.77 ! 19.50 ! 9.65 ! 9.65
ROAD (0.00 + 48.70 + 0.00) = 48.70 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq P.Adj D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq
Page 1
RD7 OLA 18mb at 27m---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.00 68.08 0.00 -2.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 -16.83 48.70----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 48.70 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 48.70 dBA
TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 56.61 (NIGHT): 48.70
Page 2
TR1 and OLA at 200mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 20-04-2018 11:14:02MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT
Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: tr1
Rail data, segment # 1: rail (day/night)----------------------------------------Train ! Trains ! Speed !# loc !# Cars! Eng !ContType ! !(km/h) !/Train!/Train! type !weld-----------------+-------------+-------+------+------+------+----* 1. train ! 7.7/6.4 ! 97.0 ! 4.0 !196.0 !Diesel! No
* The identified number of trains have been adjusted for future growth using the following parameters:
Train type: ! Unadj. ! Annual % ! Years of ! No Name ! Trains ! Increase ! Growth !--------------------+--------+----------+----------+ 1. train ! 6.0/5.0 ! 2.50 ! 10.00 !
Data for Segment # 1: rail (day/night)--------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 200.00 / 200.00 mReceiver height : 1.50 / 1.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)No WhistleReference angle : 0.00
Results segment # 1: rail (day)-------------------------------
LOCOMOTIVE (0.00 + 55.86 + 0.00) = 55.86 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.58 75.02 -17.83 -1.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.86----------------------------------------------------------------------
WHEEL (0.00 + 50.80 + 0.00) = 50.80 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.66 70.93 -18.67 -1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.80----------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 57.04 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 57.04 dBA
Results segment # 1: rail (night)---------------------------------
LOCOMOTIVE (0.00 + 58.07 + 0.00) = 58.07 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.58 77.23 -17.83 -1.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.07----------------------------------------------------------------------
WHEEL (0.00 + 53.01 + 0.00) = 53.01 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.66 73.14 -18.67 -1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.01----------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 59.25 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 59.25 dBA
TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 57.04 (NIGHT): 59.25
Page 1
TR1 and OLA at 200m
Page 2
TR6 at 200mSTAMSON 5.0 NORMAL REPORT Date: 20-04-2018 11:46:10MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY / NOISE ASSESSMENT
Filename: Time Period: Day/Night 16/8 hoursDescription: tr6
Rail data, segment # 1: rail (day/night)----------------------------------------Train ! Trains ! Speed !# loc !# Cars! Eng !ContType ! !(km/h) !/Train!/Train! type !weld-----------------+-------------+-------+------+------+------+----* 1. train ! 7.7/6.4 ! 97.0 ! 4.0 !196.0 !Diesel! No
* The identified number of trains have been adjusted for future growth using the following parameters:
Train type: ! Unadj. ! Annual % ! Years of ! No Name ! Trains ! Increase ! Growth !--------------------+--------+----------+----------+ 1. train ! 6.0/5.0 ! 2.50 ! 10.00 !
Data for Segment # 1: rail (day/night)--------------------------------------Angle1 Angle2 : -90.00 deg 90.00 degWood depth : 0 (No woods.)No of house rows : 0 / 0Surface : 1 (Absorptive ground surface)Receiver source distance : 200.00 / 200.00 mReceiver height : 16.50 / 16.50 mTopography : 1 (Flat/gentle slope; no barrier)No WhistleReference angle : 0.00
Results segment # 1: rail (day)-------------------------------
LOCOMOTIVE (0.00 + 61.88 + 0.00) = 61.88 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.14 75.02 -12.77 -0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 61.88----------------------------------------------------------------------
WHEEL (0.00 + 56.35 + 0.00) = 56.35 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.24 70.93 -13.95 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.35----------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 62.95 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 62.95 dBA
Results segment # 1: rail (night)---------------------------------
LOCOMOTIVE (0.00 + 64.08 + 0.00) = 64.08 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.14 77.23 -12.77 -0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 64.08----------------------------------------------------------------------
WHEEL (0.00 + 58.55 + 0.00) = 58.55 dBAAngle1 Angle2 Alpha RefLeq D.Adj F.Adj W.Adj H.Adj B.Adj SubLeq---------------------------------------------------------------------- -90 90 0.24 73.14 -13.95 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.55----------------------------------------------------------------------
Segment Leq : 65.15 dBA
Total Leq All Segments: 65.15 dBA
TOTAL Leq FROM ALL SOURCES (DAY): 62.95 (NIGHT): 65.15
Page 1
TR6 at 200m
Page 2
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc.
Appendix C
Site Plan
RO
AD W
IDEN
ING
BY
DEP
OSI
TED
PLA
N 6
10 (H
WYS
)
SID
EWAL
K
CAR
OU
SEL
DR
IVE
BRO
CK
RO
AD
48.71N71°16'30'' E
N71°17'00'' E 55.36
61.3
5
60.9
6N
18°4
2'40
'' W
N12
°28'
50''
W
PROPOSED SIX-STOREY COMMERCIAL AND
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
CO
NC
RET
E W
ALK
CONCRETE WALK
EXIS
TIN
G 3
-STO
REY
BR
ICK
TOW
NH
OU
SE
EXISTING 3-STOREY BRICK TOWNHOUSE
FIRE ROUTEHEAVY DUTY ASPHALT
LAN
DSC
APE
PARKETTE
LANDSCAPE
RAMPDN
RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT ONLY
FIR
E R
OU
TEH
EAVY
DU
TY A
SPH
ALT
LOADING / RECEIVING
FS
LANDSCAPE
RET
AIL
PA
RKI
NG
RAMP TO UNDERGROUND PARKING
1260
235
648
1270
3
CO
NC
RET
E W
ALKW
AY
CONCRETE WALKWAY
TRANSFORMER
22000 22533
TWO
-STO
RE
YO
NE-
STO
RE
Y
1362 2848
4209
4209
(TYP)5700 3000
R 12000R 60
00
R 6000
6500
12
FS
6000
LANDSCAPE
4894
7
LANDSCAPE
3800
4500
4500
RESIDENCE ENTRANCE
20000
R 9726
6000
EXISTING TRANSFOMER ON CONC. PAD
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TO BE RELOCATED
3503
2700
(TYP)5700
(TYP)6500
2228
10138
(TYP
)26
00
CONCRETE WALKWAY
1200
1633
CONCRETE WALKWAY
BASEMENT BELOW
BASEMENT BELOW
BASEMENT BELOW
BASEMENT BELOW
11652
SITE
TAUNTON RD
BRO
CK
Zents Dr
LOT AREA: 3,171 M2 (0.784 ACRE)
GROSS FLOOR AREA (GFA)
PARKING
REQUIRED: 1.0 SPACE PER UNITTOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 35 SPACESTOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 40 SPACES
PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE: 27.1%FSI: 1.57
RESIDENTIAL (UNDERGROUND):
VISITOR (UNDERGROUND):
REQUIRED: 0.25 SPACE PER UNITTOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 8 SPACESTOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 8 SPACES
SITE
BUILDING AREA: 860 M2 ( 9,261 SF)RETAIL AREA: 598 M2 (6,439 SF)RESIDENTIAL AREA (5 STOREYS): 4,373 M2 (47,070 SF)TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA: 4,971 M2 (53,509 SF)
LANDSCAPE AREA: 852 M2 (9,174 SF)LANDSCAPE COVERAGE: 26.8%
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 35 UNITS.2-BEDROOM: 14 UNITS2-BEDROOM + DEN: 16 UNITS(INCLUDING 5 BARRIER-FREE UNITS)3-BEDROOM + DEN: 5 UNITS
PROPOSED DENSITY: 110 UNITS/HECTARE
RETAIL (SURFACE):
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 19 SPACES( INCLUDING 2 ACCESSIBLE PARKING )
Checked by :
Drawn by :
Date
Scale :
Drawing No :
Project :
Drawing Name :
This drawing is provided by and is the property of AND Architecture Inc..The contractor must verify all dimensions and conditions on site and mustnotify AND Architecture Inc. of any variations from the supplied information.This drawing is not to be scaled. The architect is not responsible for other consultants' information shown on this drawing. Refer to the appropriate consultant's drawings before proceeding with the work. Construction must conform to all applicable codes and requirements of authorities having jurisdiction. The contractor working from drawings not specifically marked 'For Construction' must assume full responsibility and bear costs for any corrections or damages resulting from his work.
Project No :MAY 2017
C:\
User
s\H
enry
Wa
ng\D
ocum
ents
\BRO
CK
ROA
D -
SPA
REV
2_H
enry
Wa
ng.rv
t
As indicated
HW
JWA1.1
SIX-STOREY COMMERCIAL ANDRESIDENTIAL BUILDING
SITE PLAN
BROCK ROAD, PICKERING, ONTARIO
17029
1 : 150SITE PLAN1
KEY PLAN
No. Date: Issued/Revision: By1 MAR. 08/18 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION HW2 MAY 09/18 ISSUED FOR REZONING HW3 MAY 28/18 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION HW4 JULY 24/18 REISSUED FOR REVIEW HW
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc.
Appendix D
Noise Impact Warning Clauses
Noise and Vibration Impact Study, Brock Road, Pickering
2184107 Ontario Inc.
Ref. No.: 7419-001
2018-08-16
Cambium Inc.
CP Rail Warning Clause (All units):
Warning: CP Railway or its assigns or successors in interest has or have a rights-of-way within 300 metres from
the land the subject hereof. There may be alterations to or expansions of the railway facilities on such rights-of-
way in the future including the possibility that the railway or its assigns or successors as aforesaid may expand its
operations, which expansion may affect the living environment of the residents in the vicinity, notwithstanding the
inclusion of any noise and vibration attenuating measures in the design of the development and individual
dwelling(s). CP Railway will not be responsible for any complaints or claims arising from the use of such facilities
and/or operations on, over or under the aforesaid rights-of-way.
NPC-300 Type A (All Units):
"Purchasers/tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic and rail traffic may occasionally
interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the sound level limits of the
Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment.”
NPC 300 Type C: (East Façade only)
"This dwelling unit has been designed with the provision for adding central air conditioning at the occupant's
discretion. Installation of central air conditioning by the occupant in low and medium density developments will
allow windows and exterior doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the
sound level limits of the Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment."
NPC 300 Type D: (All other units)
"This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior
doors to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the sound level limits of the
Municipality and the Ministry of the Environment."