91
Plasticity in sensory systems

Plasticity in sensory systems

  • Upload
    gella

  • View
    30

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Plasticity in sensory systems. Jan Schnupp on the monocycle. Activity and size of auditory cortex…. Schneider et al. Nat. Neurosci. 2003. …Are correlated…. …and correlated with musical abilities. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Plasticity in sensory systems

Plasticity in sensory systems

Page 2: Plasticity in sensory systems

Jan Schnupp on the monocycle

Page 3: Plasticity in sensory systems

Activity and size of auditory

cortex…

Schneider et al. Nat. Neurosci. 2003

Page 4: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 5: Plasticity in sensory systems

…Are correlated…

Page 6: Plasticity in sensory systems

…and correlated with musical abilities

Page 7: Plasticity in sensory systems

Is musical practice increasing the size of auditory cortex, or do

people with large auditory cortex become musicians?

Page 8: Plasticity in sensory systems

What do we learn when we learn a new skill?

Page 9: Plasticity in sensory systems

Nat. Neurosci. 2006

Page 10: Plasticity in sensory systems

Human psychoacoustical performance

Frequency differencesFrequency differencesPressure ratio between softest and loudest sounds…

Pressure ratio between softest and loudest sounds…

Hair motion at absolute threshold…Hair motion at absolute threshold…

Page 11: Plasticity in sensory systems

Learning protocol

Page 12: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 13: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 14: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 15: Plasticity in sensory systems

Perceptual learning

• Partially non-specific– Playing tetris improves frequency

discrimination

• Partially due to passive exposure

• But also to some extent requires active task performance

Page 16: Plasticity in sensory systems

Animal models of auditory plasticity

• Classical conditioning– Fear conditioning: associating a sound with a

foot shock

• Environmental enrichment and relatives– Manipulating the environment can have both

beneficial and disruptive effects on the auditory system

• Spatial hearing

Page 17: Plasticity in sensory systems

Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2004

Page 18: Plasticity in sensory systems

Fear conditioning…

Page 19: Plasticity in sensory systems

…changes cortical neurons

Page 20: Plasticity in sensory systems

Brain Research 2007

Page 21: Plasticity in sensory systems

Environmental enrichment…

Page 22: Plasticity in sensory systems

Environmental enrichment…

Page 23: Plasticity in sensory systems

Environmental enrichment…

Page 24: Plasticity in sensory systems

Plasticity in auditory enriched environments

Page 25: Plasticity in sensory systems

Auditory plasticity requires stimuli but not interaction

Page 26: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 27: Plasticity in sensory systems

Just noticeable differences in azimuthat the center, tone stimuli

Page 28: Plasticity in sensory systems

timeam

plitu

de

Interaural Time Differences (ITDs)

Interaural Level Differences (ILDs)

Binaural Cues for Localising Sounds in Space

Page 29: Plasticity in sensory systems

Interaural Time Difference (ITD) Cues

ITD

ITDs are powerful cues to sound source direction, but they are ambiguous (“cones of confusion”)ITDs are powerful cues to sound source direction, but they are ambiguous (“cones of confusion”)

Page 30: Plasticity in sensory systems

Binaural disparities in humans

ITDITD ILDILD

Page 31: Plasticity in sensory systems

Disambiguating the cone of confusion

• Sounds on the median plane (azimuth 0, different elevations) have zero binaural disparities

• This is a special case of the cone of confusion

• Nevertheless, humans and other animals can determine the elevation of a sound source

Page 32: Plasticity in sensory systems

Spectral information about space

Page 33: Plasticity in sensory systems

The barn owl…

Page 34: Plasticity in sensory systems

Binaural Cues in the Barn Owl

Barn owls have highly asymmetric outer ears, with one ear pointing up, the other down. Consequently, at high frequencies, barn owl ILDs vary with elevation, rather than with azimuth (D). Consequently ITD and ILD cues together form a grid specifying azimuth and elevation respectively.

Page 35: Plasticity in sensory systems

Phase locking at highfrequencies in the barn owl

C. Köppl, 1997

Page 36: Plasticity in sensory systems

Processing of Interaural Time Differences

Interaural time difference

MS

O n

euro

n re

spon

s e

Sound on the ipsilateral side

Contra- lateral side

Medial superior olive

To the Inferior Colliculus

Page 37: Plasticity in sensory systems

Preservation of Time Cues in AVCN

• Auditory Nerve Fibers connect to spherical and globular bushy cells in the antero-ventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) via large, fast and secure synapses known as “endbulbs of Held”.

• Phase locking in bushy cells is even more precise than in the afferent nerve fibers.

• Bushy cells project to the superior olivary complex.

• Auditory Nerve Fibers connect to spherical and globular bushy cells in the antero-ventral cochlear nucleus (AVCN) via large, fast and secure synapses known as “endbulbs of Held”.

• Phase locking in bushy cells is even more precise than in the afferent nerve fibers.

• Bushy cells project to the superior olivary complex.

sphericalbushy

cell

sphericalbushy

cell

endbulbof Held

endbulbof Held

VIII nervefiber

VIII nervefiber

Page 38: Plasticity in sensory systems

The coincidence detection model of Jeffress The coincidence detection model of Jeffress (1948) is the widely accepted model for low-(1948) is the widely accepted model for low-

frequency sound frequency sound localisationlocalisation

Page 39: Plasticity in sensory systems

Res

pons

e

Interaural Time Difference0

Page 40: Plasticity in sensory systems

Res

pons

e

Interaural Time Difference0

Page 41: Plasticity in sensory systems

Window

SemicircularCanals

Left Ear Right EarCochlear Nucleus

MSO

0 s Time Delay

0 s

0 s Time Delay

Auditory Nerve ActivityLarge calyx synaptic ending

Cochlear Nucleus

Page 42: Plasticity in sensory systems

Window

SemicircularCanals

Left Ear Right EarCochlear Nucleus

MSO

300 s Time Delay

300 s

Arrives at left ear 300 s later than at the right

Coincident spikes

Auditory Nerve ActivityLarge calyx synaptic ending

Cochlear Nucleus

Page 43: Plasticity in sensory systems

Window

SemicircularCanals

Left Ear Right EarCochlear Nucleus

MSO

300 s Time Delay 0 s Time Delay

0 s300 s

0 s Time DelayArrives at left ear 300 s later than at the right

Coincident spikes

Auditory Nerve ActivityLarge calyx synaptic ending

Cochlear Nucleus

Page 44: Plasticity in sensory systems

Interaural Phase Sensitivity in the MSO to 1000 Hz

Yin and Chan (1988)

1 ms 1 ms

Page 45: Plasticity in sensory systems

Processing of Interaural Level Differences

Interaural intensity difference

LS

O n

eur o

n r e

s po n

se

Sound on the ipsilateral side

Contralateralside

C > II > CLateral superior olive

To the Inferior Colliculus

Page 46: Plasticity in sensory systems

The Calyx of Held

• MNTB relay neurons receive their input via very large calyx of Held synapses.

• These secure synapses would not be needed if the MNTB only fed into “ILD pathway” in the LSO.

• MNTB also provides precisely timed inhibition to MSO.

Page 47: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 48: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 49: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 50: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 51: Plasticity in sensory systems

Caird and Klinke 1983Frequency (kHz)

0.125 0.12532 32

Sou

nd le

vel (

dB S

PL)

20 20

100100

Ipsilateral Contralateral

Page 52: Plasticity in sensory systems

The Superior Olivary Nuclei – a Summary

• Most neurons in the MSO respond best to sounds that occur earlier in the contralateral ear.

• Most neurons in the LSO respond best to sounds that are louder in the ipsilateral ear.

• Space representation is crossed, and therefore LSO projects mostly contralaterally and MSO ipsilaterally.

MNTBMNTB

MSOMSO

LSOLSO

CNCN CNCN

Midline

Inhibitory ConnectionExcitatory Connection

ICIC ICIC

Page 53: Plasticity in sensory systems

Spatial hearing is plastic

Page 54: Plasticity in sensory systems

Plasticity in adults

Nat. Neurosci. 1998

Page 55: Plasticity in sensory systems

New ears…

Page 56: Plasticity in sensory systems

Sound localization by humans

-30 0 30

Page 57: Plasticity in sensory systems

Sound localization by humans

Page 58: Plasticity in sensory systems

Effect of modifying the ear

Page 59: Plasticity in sensory systems

Learning the new ears

Page 60: Plasticity in sensory systems

Knowing both ears

Page 61: Plasticity in sensory systems

Plasticity of the space map

Knudsen, Nature 2002

Page 62: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 63: Plasticity in sensory systems

Orientation responses to auditory and visual stimuli are congruent…

Auditory orientation response

Visual orientation response

Page 64: Plasticity in sensory systems

Prisms that shift the visual scene

Page 65: Plasticity in sensory systems

Auditory responses adapt to the visual shift

Page 66: Plasticity in sensory systems

The brain of the barn owl

Page 67: Plasticity in sensory systems

The ICC, ICX and the Superior Collicullus (Optic Tectum)

Page 68: Plasticity in sensory systems

Point-to-point correspondence between ICX and OT

Page 69: Plasticity in sensory systems

Neural correlate of the shift of auditory responses

Page 70: Plasticity in sensory systems
Page 71: Plasticity in sensory systems

Shift in ITD sensitivity occurs first in ICX

Page 72: Plasticity in sensory systems

Axonal sprouting cause shift of ITD sensitivity in ICX

Page 73: Plasticity in sensory systems

Axonal sprouting cause shift of ITD sensitivity in ICX

Page 74: Plasticity in sensory systems

Time course of ITD shift

Page 75: Plasticity in sensory systems

Cellular mechanisms of ITD shift

Page 76: Plasticity in sensory systems

Anatomy of the instructive signal

Page 77: Plasticity in sensory systems

Visual activity in ICX uncovered by removing inhibition in OT

Page 78: Plasticity in sensory systems

Cellular mechanisms of ITD shift

Page 79: Plasticity in sensory systems

NMDA receptors are present at the transition stage…

Page 80: Plasticity in sensory systems

…but not when the shift is complete

Page 81: Plasticity in sensory systems

Cellular mechanisms of ITD shift

Page 82: Plasticity in sensory systems

GABA participates in the suppression of the normal responses

Control

Bicuculline

Page 83: Plasticity in sensory systems

Plasticity and age

Page 84: Plasticity in sensory systems

Old animals cannot change

Page 85: Plasticity in sensory systems

A sensitive period…

Page 86: Plasticity in sensory systems

During the sensitive period, plasticity potential is very large

Page 87: Plasticity in sensory systems

The normal map is robust and can be recovered at any age

Page 88: Plasticity in sensory systems

Recovery of the normal map requires rich environment

Page 89: Plasticity in sensory systems

Adult plasticity is possible after juvenile experience

Page 90: Plasticity in sensory systems

Adult plasticity is possible after juvenile experience

Page 91: Plasticity in sensory systems

Time course of adult adjustment