13
Chess Review May 11, 2005 Berkeley, CA Platform Modeling and Analysis Presented by Tivadar Szemethy ISIS, Vanderbilt University

Platform Modeling and Analysis

  • Upload
    gigi

  • View
    38

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Platform Modeling and Analysis. Presented by Tivadar Szemethy ISIS, Vanderbilt University. Model-Based Design with Components. Design Model components interacting according to a “Model of Computation” Runtime Platform abstraction of HW/SW/MW services. Component-Based System. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Chess ReviewMay 11, 2005Berkeley, CA

Platform Modeling and Analysis

Presented byTivadar SzemethyISIS, Vanderbilt University

Page 2: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 2

Model-Based Design with Components

Design Modelcomponents interacting

according to a “Model of Computation”

Runtime Platformabstraction of

HW/SW/MW services

Platform

HW CPU

Network

HW CPU

Comp.

Comp.

Comp. Comp.

Comp.

Comp. Comp.

Component-Based System

System Synthesis:1. Map the design-time components into platform

objects2. Enforce interaction rules using platform services

Page 3: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 3

Analysis model for verification

• Verification:– does it satisfy requirements specification ?

• Need design requirements, in terms of– observable MoC events (mapped to Platform)– Platform quantities (resources)

Analysis necessitates Platform-level model

Behavior := System Model + Components + MoC semantics + Platform

properties

Page 4: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 4

Platform-level analysis model

• Purpose – formal verification (ideal)– simulation (at least)

• Language for analysis model:– SMV/SPIN model, Timed/Hybrid Automata…– Simulink…

• To be automatically constructed based on– MoC semantics (formal, well-defined)– Platform properties (?)

Page 5: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 5

Example: SMOLES -> UPPAAL 1.

• Application: Camera tracking an object

• Simple MOdeling Lang. for Embedded Sys.– Dataflow-oriented DSML in GME– Components, Ports, Triggers, Timers, Methods

• Platform: DataFlow Kernel– simple OO asynch. dataflow engine in C++/Java– SMOLES model interpreter generates code

• Analysis model: UPPAAL Timed Automata

Page 6: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 6

Example: SMOLES -> UPPAAL 2.

Page 7: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 7

Example: SMOLES -> UPPAAL 3.

KernelrunTimer1

runComponent1

g: (running == kernel &&Timer1Clk > Period1 &&Timer1OutBuff.avaliable())u: Timer1Clk.reset()u: Timer1OutBuf++

.

.

.g: (running == kernel &&

UComp1.Methodm.Triggert)u: running:=Comp1

schedule

g: running == kernel

g: (running == kernel &&

not(UCompn.Methodm.Triggert) &&

not(UTimernClk>Periodn)u: IdleClk.reset()

inv: IdleClk

<IdlePeriod

idle

g: IdleClk >= IdlePeriod

Idle

.

.

.

Method1

g: (running == me &&trigger1 == true)u: input_token_cnt--

inv: (clk < WCET)

g: (clk >= BCET)u: output_token_cnt++, running:=Kernel

Componenti

Methodn

Page 8: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 8

Example: SMOLES -> UPPAAL 4.

Translation rulesetinput: SMOLES modeloutput: UPPAAL TAimplicit: DFK “internals”

Platform-level modelone TA per componentone TA for KernelTranslation using

graph transformations

GReAT graph rewriting tool (GME add-on)

Page 9: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 9

Lessons learned

UPPAAL analysis model too restrictiveno preemptive

schedulingonly for timing analysisno higher-level structures

“Intermediate format”e.g. IF or Metropolishigher-level languageprovides mapping to

multiple analysis tools

DFK model was implicit in transformation:complex, monolithic

transformation spec.

Platform model as1) “Skeleton” for

1) Components2) Kernel

2) Rules to construct synchronizers/guards

3) Composition

results published in:

“Platform Modeling and Model Transformations for Analysis”in Journal of Universal Computer Science vol. 10, pp. 1383-1407, 2004

Page 10: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 10

Generating the analysis model

Well-definedtoolchain

The DSML → IF transformation needs to “know”:• DSML → Platform mapping• Platform → IF mapping• Platform interaction rules

Page 11: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 11

Generating the transformation

Well-definedtoolchain

Encoded in the transformation:• DSML to Platform mapping• Platform to IF (“expansion”)• Platform interaction rules

Transformation generator:

1. rewrite the (DSML→Platform)mapping to (DSML → IF)

2. model composition rules(through Kernel entity, defined in the PM)

Page 12: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 12

The “Big Picture”

Meta-level “operational”

level

Page 13: Platform Modeling and Analysis

Review, May 11, 2005 13

Preliminary results

• Formalizing the Platform– GME metamodel for DFK– SMOLES → DFK transformation specified as

graph transformation in GReAT

• In search of an Intermediate Format– Evaluating VERIMAG’s IF framework

(metamodel, simple translators and examples)

• Started working on modeling– Giotto with E-machine