Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
WEBEX Etiquette
Please mute your phone by pressing *6. Please do not place your phone on hold at anytime. If you have music on your hold, it disrupts the meeting. Questions If you have a question, please - Unmute your phone by pressing *6 - State your name - Ask your question - Mute phone when complete by pressing *6 - Or type your question in the WEBEX browser If you experience difficulty in hearing WEBEX – please type message in WEBEX browser
www.kindermorgan.com
June 16, 2014 WEBEX
www.kindermorgan.com
Erin Mortimer Sr. Scheduler Rep, Transportation & Storage Services
KM Interstate – East Region
4
Agenda
• Background • Scheduling Priorities with SIP • Screen Modifications • Redirects at Intraday Cycles • Notice changes • Important Notes • Q&A
www.kindermorgan.com
Sherri Glazebrook Director, Transportation & Storage Services
KM Interstate – East Region
6
Apr 2012 Jan 2013 Oct 2013 May 2014 Mar 2011 Jun 2014
TGP proposed elevated SIP priority in rate case filing
FERC approved elevated levels of SIP priority Oct 17
Gas Day June 17 Elevated SIP priority now available
Timeline – New SIP Service
Background
May 15 FERC denied Indicated Shippers request for rehearing
FERC Order establishing Technical Conference Jan 17
Apr 19 FERC issued order supporting elevated levels of SIP priority
Apr 2013
Apr 10 Technical Conference
DART Training on New SIP Priority - WEBEX Jun 10
www.kindermorgan.com
Cathy Soape Hutton Manager, Transportation & Storage Services
KM Interstate – East Region
8
NEW Scheduling Priorities - effective June 17, 2014 Timely Cycle
Current Path Scheduling Priority – PIP nominations – Primary receipt points to primary delivery points is highest priority – SIP nominations – SOP nominations – IT nominations
New Path Scheduling Priority – PIP nominations – from primary receipt points to primary delivery points remains highest
priority over all SIP nominations
– Elevated SIP1 nominations – from secondary receipt points to primary delivery points, highest SIP priority displayed as “SIPsp”
– Elevated SIP2 nominations – from primary receipt points to secondary delivery points displayed as “SIPps”
– Other SIP3 nominations – from secondary receipt points to secondary delivery points displayed as “SIPss”
9
Example: Current In-Path Restrictions - Segments
Capacity Path – R1 to D1 (primary contractual path) 1. highest priority - Primary in the Path Nom (PIP) – Primary receipt to Primary delivery, Restriction in Path
2. Next priority - Secondary in the Path Nom (SIP) – Secondary Receipt to Primary Delivery, Secondary Receipt to Secondary Delivery, and Primary Receipt to Secondary Delivery through Restriction Path l
Point of Restriction
R1 D1
R1
R3 D2
D3
D1 R2
10
Example: NEW In-Path Restrictions - Segments
NEW Priority Scheduling with elevated SIP service Capacity Path – R1 to D1 (primary contractual path) 1. Primary in the Path Nom (PIP) – Primary receipt, Restriction in Path, Primary delivery 2. Secondary in the Path Nom (SP) – Secondary receipt, Restriction in Path, Primary Delivery 3. Secondary in the Path Nom (PS) – Primary receipt, Restriction in Path, Secondary Delivery 4. Secondary in the Path Nom (SS) – Secondary receipt, Restriction in Path, Secondary Delivery
- Point of Restriction
R1 D1
D1 R2
R1 D2
R3 D3
11
All Firm Scheduling Priorities for Path (Segment) Restrictions –with NEW SIP
Nomination Examples Path Priority
Primary Receipt to Primary Delivery (PIP) 1
Secondary Receipt to Primary Delivery in path – SIP1 (SIPsp) 2
Primary Receipt to Secondary Delivery in path – SIP2 (SIPps) 3
Secondary Receipt to Secondary Delivery in path – SIP3 (SIPss) 4
Any out of path (SOP) 5
Lower number is highest priority
12
All Firm Scheduling Priorities for Point Restrictions
Contractual point priority (with path priority) Receipt Restriction Priority
Delivery Restriction Priority
Primary Point in any path *** 1 1
Secondary Point in SIP1 – (SIPsp) 2 N/A
Secondary Point in SIP2 – (SIPps) N/A 2
Secondary Point in SIP3 – (SIPss) 3 3
Secondary Point out of path 4 4
*** At a point level restriction, primary point status is highest priority regardless of being in PIP, SIP, or SOP path priority. Secondary point priority may differ based on what path priority its in.
13
Scheduling Cut Queue Screen
Note: Scheduling Cut Queue Screen for both Points and Segments look the same; however receipt points will never have Secondary (In-Path)ps and delivery points will never have Secondary (In-Path)sp
5050 Public Gas Storage
14
Capacity End Point Split Screen for Segments
PS – Previously Scheduled sp – secondary receipt to primary delivery ps – primary receipts- to secondary delivery ss – secondary receipt to secondary delivery
508881-FTATGP
15
Example: Elevated In-Path Restrictions - Points
Primary Delivery Priority view in Capacity Split Screen
Note: If viewing capacity from a point perspective, primary deliveries will always display as “P” or “PS” (previously scheduled) regardless if its on a PIP or SIPsp route
16
Example: Elevated In-Path Restrictions - Points
Primary Receipt Priority view in Capacity Split Screen
Note: If viewing capacity from a point perspective, primary receipts will always display as “P” or “PS” (previously scheduled) regardless if its on a PIP or SIPps route
17
Redirects – Nomination path changes at non-timely cycles
• Redirects within contracts will be allowed for all in the path priorities of service
• Redirects within contracts from/to a higher or lower SIP priority is allowed. i.e. changing nomination paths from any SIP priority paths to a lower SIP priority after timely will still be considered previously scheduled (PS) at later cycles.
• As today, redirects within contracts from in the path priorities to out of path priorities will
not be allowed and will be considered new routes
• Allows rank changes within a contract for in the path priorities of service
Examples of PS (previously scheduled) nomination paths: 1. Timely Cycle nom of Secondary In the Path (SP) on K 1234 Redirect at Evening Cycle nom to Primary in the Path (PIP) on K 1234 2. Timely Cycle nom of Secondary In the Path (SS) on K1234 Redirect at Evening Cycle nom of Secondary In the Path (PS) on K 123 3 . Timely Cycle nom of Secondary in the Path (SP) on K1234 Redirect at Evening Cycle to Secondary in the Path (SS) on K1234 4. Timely Cycle nom of Primary in the Path (PIP) on K 1234 Redirect at Evening Cycle to Secondary in the Path (SP) on K1234 Examples of Noms Not Utilizing PS (previously scheduled): 1. Timely Cycle nom of Primary in the Path (PIP) on K 1234 Redirect at Evening Cycle to Secondary out of the Path on K1234
18
Example of Notice Language
• RESTRICTIONS • MLV 201 M/S (Segment 200 BH) – through 100% of SOP EC increases due to
scheduled maintenance; 35,796 Dths • • STA 245 S/M (Segment 245 FH) – through approx 81% of SIPss EC increases due to
scheduled maintenance and nominations in excess of capacity; 404,292 Dths • • STA 307 M/S (Segment 307 BH) – through approx 90% of SIPsp EC increases due to
scheduled maintenance; 181,974 Dths • • STA 315 M/S (Segment 315 BH) – through 100% of SIPps EC increases due to
nominations in excess of capacity; 103,997 Dths • • Mahwah Delivery Meter (Pin 420207) - through approx 37% of SIPps due to
nominations in excess of capacity; 157,915 Dths
19
Rationale
• Aligned with Commission policy and precedent • Maintains priority of Primary In-the-Path nominations • Recognizes fundamental difference between primary delivery point
service to LDCs and end-use customers • Supports access to diverse supply sources Recognizes importance of secondary access to new emerging supply points (e.g., pooling points, interconnects, well heads) that may not be a primary receipt Enhances value of supply pools on TGP Increases value of primary contract rights
Important Notes • TGP reserves sufficient capacity to meet firm contract obligations between primary receipt
and primary delivery points • Does not impact in-the-path firm service absent a force majeure event or significant
maintenance • Is not intended to address any particular constraints and TGP can not predict the likely
location of a capacity constraint which can occur at any place at anytime • Nonetheless, such outages occur and it is imperative that the tariff provide a just and
reasonable capacity allocation methodology • The Commission appropriately characterizes this as a policy issue • The issue is not amenable to technical, engineering, operational or other factual evidence to
provide clarity • Cures the deficiency of its prior SIP proposal with regard to degradation of primary to
primary service • The Commission clarified that a scheduling proposal that distinguishes between receipt and
delivery services on the basis of the disparate impact on consumers may be supportable • Provides a just and reasonable preference to primary delivery service over primary receipt
service based on the disparate nature of LDC and end-use needs • Is consistent with Texas Eastern precedent
www.kindermorgan.com