60
Plantar Fasciitis: What to Do With Refractory Patients Craig Young, MD Medical College of Wisconsin

Pltr Fasc Refractory pt - AOSSM · 2020. 9. 14. · Allen BH, Fallat LM, Schwartz SM. Cryosurgery: an innovative technique for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Plantar Fasciitis: What to Do With Refractory Patients

    Craig Young, MD

    Medical College of Wisconsin

  • Goals

    !  Basic science background - brief

    !  Diagnosis - really brief

    !  Treatment !  Brief summary of treatment options !  Discuss my approach to patients

  • Etiology

    ! Acute (rare) - may occur from trauma

    ! Chronic !  Repetitive overloading of the plantar

    fascia (Kogler 95,96,99) !  Tendonopathic & chronic enthesitic

    changes !  Collagen degeneration !  Fiber disorientation !  Increased ground substance !  Absence of inflammatory cells

    (Maffulli 03 & Yuan 03)

  • Key findings on history & exam

    !  Worse pain with 1st AM steps !  Pain after prolonged non-weight bearing

    !  Pain with barefoot walking

    !  No symptoms & signs of neurologic involvement

    !  Pain & tenderness over plantar fascia origin

    !  Windlass test

    !  Sensitivity 13.6%; Specificity 100%

    !  Weight-bearing windlass !  Sensitivity 31.8%; Specificity 100%

    (DeGarceau 2003 Foot & Ankle Intl)

  • Treatment options

    “Traditional” !  Stretching & strengthening

    !  Modalities

    !  NSAIDs

    !  Cortisone

    !  Night splints & walking boots

    !  Foot wear, orthotics, heel cups & arch supports

    !  Surgery

    “Newer”

    !  Deep tissue techniques

    !  Extracorporeal & intracorporeal shock wave

    !  Prolotherapy, PRP, botox autologous blood injection

    !  Nitroglycerin patches

    !  Nerve ablasion ‒ cryo & RF

  • My approach

    ! Relative rest ! Stretching

    !  Consider night splint !  Physical therapy

    !  Strengthening?

    ! Arch support !  Check shoes !  Arch taping !  OTC !  Orthotic

    ! Patience

    ! Adjunctive !  Acetaminophen !  NSAIDs

  • My approach, continued

    !  More patience

    !  For chronic or those who like intervention !  Injection

    !  Autologous blood vs. vs. PRP vs. cortisone !  ECSW !  Surgery

  • Panel comments

  • Any questions?

  • http://pier.acponline.org/physicians/diseases/d065/d065.html

    [email protected]

  • References

    !  Allen BH, Fallat LM, Schwartz SM. Cryosurgery: an innovative technique for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46:75-9. (PMID:17331865)

    !  Babcock MS, Foster L, Pasquina P, Jabbari B. Treatment of pain attributed to plantar fasciitis with botulinum toxin a: a short-term, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:649-54. (PMID:16141740)

    !  Chuckpaiwong B, Berkson EM, Theodore GH. Extracorporeal shock wave for chronic proximal plantar fasciitis: 225 patients with results and outcome predictors. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48:148-55. (PMID:19232966)

    !  De Garceau D, Dean D, Requejo SM, Thordarson DB. The association between diagnosis of plantar fasciitis and Windlass test results. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:251-5. (PMID:12793489)

  • !  Dogramaci Y. Kalaci A. Emir A. Yanat AN. Gokce A. Intracorporeal pneumatic shock application for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized, double blind prospective clinical trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010. 130(4):541-6. UI: 19669773

    !  Donley BG, Moore T, Sferra J, Gozdanovic J, Smith R. The efficacy of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication (NSAID) in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:20-3. (PMID:17257533)

    !  Fadale PD, Wiggins ME. Corticosteroid Injections: Their Use and Abuse. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994;2:133-140. (PMID:10709001)

    !  Frater C, Vu D, Van der Wall H, Perera C, Halasz P, Emmett L, Fogelman I. Bone scintigraphy predicts outcome of steroid injection for plantar fasciitis. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1577-80. (PMID:17015890)

  • !  Gerdesmeyer L, Frey C, Vester J, Maier M, Weil L Jr, Weil L Sr, et al. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of chronic recalcitrant plantar fasciitis: results of a confirmatory randomized placebo-controlled multicenter study. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:2100-9. (PMID:18832341)

    !  Gray RG. Gottlieb NL. Intra-articular corticosteroids. An updated assessment. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1983. (177):235-63.UI: 6345042

    !  Haake M, Buch M, Schoellner C, Goebel F, Vogel M, Mueller I, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis: randomised controlled multicentre trial. BMJ. 2003;327:75. (PMID:12855524)

    !  Hammer DS, Adam F, Kreutz A, Kohn D, Seil R. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in patients with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis: a 2-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:823-8. (PMID:14655885)

  • !  Huang YC, Wei SH, Wang HK, Lieu FK. Ultrasonographic guided botulinum toxin type A treatment for plantar fasciitis: an outcome-based investigation for treating pain and gait changes. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:136-40. (PMID:20140409)

    !  Höfling I, Joukainen A, Venesmaa P, Kröger H. Preliminary experience of a single session of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:150-4. (PMID:18315969)

    !  Hogan KA, Webb D, Shereff M. Endoscopic plantar fascia release. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:875-81. (PMID:15680100)

    !  Ibrahim MI, Donatelli RA, Schmitz C, Hellman MA, Buxbaum F. Chronic plantar fasciitis treated with two sessions of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:391-7. (PMID:20460065)

    !  Kiter E, Celikbas E, Akkaya S, Demirkan F, Kiliç BA. Comparison of injection modalities in the treatment of plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006;96:293-6. (PMID:16868321)

  • !  Kudo P, Dainty K, Clarfield M, Coughlin L, Lavoie P, Lebrun C. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial evaluating the treatment of plantar fasciitis with an extracoporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) device: a North American confirmatory study. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:115-23. (PMID:16435344)

    !  Kogler GF, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. In vitro method for quantifying the effectiveness of the longitudinal arch support mechanism of a foot orthosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1995;10:245-252. (PMID:11415561)

    !  Kogler GF, Veer FB, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. The influence of medial and lateral placement of orthotic wedges on loading of the plantar aponeurosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1403-13. (PMID:10535590)

    !  Kogler GF, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. Biomechanics of longitudinal arch support mechanisms in foot orthoses and their effect on plantar aponeurosis strain. Clin Biomech. 1996;11:243-252. (PMID:11415628)

  • !  Liden B, Simmons M, Landsman AS. A retrospective analysis of 22 patients treated with percutaneous radiofrequency nerve ablation for prolonged moderate to severe heel pain associated with plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48:642-7. (PMID:19857819)

    !  Maffulli N, Wong J, Almekinders LC. Types and epidemiology of tendinopathy. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22:675-92. (PMID:14560540)

    !  Malay DS, Pressman MM, Assili A, Kline JT, York S, Buren B, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic proximal plantar fasciitis: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter intervention trial. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;45:196-210. (PMID:16818146)

    !  Martin RP. Autologous Blood Injection for Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Study [abstract]. Clin J Sport Med. 2005; 15:387-8.

  • !  McCallum SD. Paoloni JA. Murrell GA. Five-year prospective comparison study of topical glyceryl trinitrate treatment of chronic lateral epicondylosis at the elbow. Br J Sports Med 2011. 45(5):416-20. UI: 19553221

    !  Riddle DL, Schappert SM. Volume of ambulatory care visits and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: a national study of medical doctors. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:303-10. (PMID:15134610)

    !  Ogden JA, Alvarez RG, Levitt RL, Johnson JE, Marlow ME. Electrohydraulic high-energy shock-wave treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:2216-28. (PMID:15466731)

    !  Paoloni JA. Murrell GA.Three-year followup study of topical glyceryl trinitrate treatment of chronic noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot & Ankle International 2007. 28(10):1064-8, UI: 17923056

  • !  Roos E, Engstrom M, Soderberg B. Foot orthoses for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:606-11. (PMID:16919213)

    !  Rompe JD, Decking J, Schoellner C, Nafe B. Shock wave application for chronic plantar fasciitis in running athletes. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:268-75. (PMID:12642264)

    !  Rompe JD, Furia J, Weil L, Maffulli N. Shock wave therapy for chronic plantar fasciopathy. Br Med Bull. 2007;81-82:183-208. (PMID:17456546)

    !  Ryan MB. Wong AD. Gillies JH. Wong J. Taunton JE. Sonographically guided intratendinous injections of hyperosmolar dextrose/lidocaine: a pilot study for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. Br J Sports Med 2009. 43(4):303-6. UI: 19019908

    !  Saxena A. Uniportal endoscopic plantar fasciotomy: a prospective study on athletic patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:882-9. (PMID:15680101)

  • !  Sharma NK. Loudon JK. Static progressive stretch brace as a treatment of pain and functional limitations associated with plantar fasciitis: a pilot study. Foot & Ankle Specialist. 2010. 3(3):117-24. UI: 20508011

    !  Speed CA, Nichols D, Wies J, Humphreys H, Richards C, Burnet S, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis. A double blind randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:937-40. (PMID:12919884)

    !  Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, McKenzie DC, Lloyd-Smith DR, Zumbo BD. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36:95-101. (PMID:11916889)

    !  Theodore GH, Buch M, Amendola A, Bachmann C, Fleming LL, Zingas C. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:290-7. (PMID:15134608)

  • !  Tornese D, Mattei E, Lucchesi G, Bandi M, Ricci G, Melegati G. Comparison of two extracorporeal shock wave therapy techniques for the treatment of painful subcalcaneal spur. A randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22:780-7. (PMID:18728131)

    !  Tong KB. Furia J. Economic burden of plantar fasciitis treatment in the United States. Am J Orthop 2010. 39(5):227-31.

    !  Tweed JL. Barnes MR. Allen MJ. An evaluation of the long-term effects of total plantar fasciotomy--a preliminary study. Foot 2009. 19(2):75-9. UI: 20307454

    !  Wang CJ, Wang FS, Yang KD, Weng LH, Ko JY. Long-term results of extracorporeal shockwave treatment for plantar fasciitis. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:592-6. (PMID:16556754)

  • !  Young CC, Rutherford DS, Niedfeldt MW. Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. Am Fam Physician 63(3): 467-474, 2001.

    !  Young CC. Plantar fasciitis. American College of Physicians Physicians' Information and Education Resource (PIER) Project [serial online: http://pier.acponline.org/physicians/diseases/d065/d065-pdf.html]. 2007 Jan

    !  Young CC. Plantar fasciitis. eMedicine Journal [serial online: http://emedicine/sports]. Rev Jan 2012

    !  Young CC. In the clinic: Plantar fasciitis. Ann Int Med. 2012. 156(1):ITC1-1-16.

    !  Yuan J, Wang MX, Murrell GA. Cell death and tendinopathy. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22:693-701. (PMID:14560541)

  • Epidemiology

    !  2 million person/yr in US

    !  1 million patient visits/yr

    !  3rd most common injury in runners

    !  Cost of treatment to third-party payers ranged from $192-376 million in 2007 in USA

    (Riddle 2004, Tauton 2002, Tong 2010)

  • Radiologic studies

    ! Plain x-rays - only useful to r/o other conditions ! Heel spurs 2x more

    likely in pt with PF

    ! MRI or Dx UTZ ! Both show

    increases in fascia thickness in PF of 1.5 -1.9 mm

  • Differential diagnosis

    !  Plantar fascia rupture

    ! Calcaneal fracture

    ! Calcaneal apophysitis

    ! Heel fat pad syndrome

    !  Longitudinal arch strain

    ! Nerve entrapment

    !  Tumor

  • Modalities !  Studies including ultrasound, laser,

    magnetic fields

    !  Overall - no significant improvement

    !  When to use !  Resistant cases !  Speed is of essence

  • NSAIDs

    ! A randomized, PC study of 29 patients !  17 on placebo and 12 on NSAIDs

    ! Both groups improved at the 1, 2 & 6 month follow-up !  Trend toward improved pain control & disability in the

    NSAID group

    ! Significant improvements overall in both groups.

    (Donley 2007 Foot Ankl Intl)

  • Corticosteroid injection

    ! Short term benefits

    ! Risks/side effects ! Pain

    !  Post-injection flare (2-5%) !  Infection

    !  0.072% with aseptic technique !  0.0001% with sterile technique

    !  Bleeding ! HPA suppression Gray 1983

  • AAOS orthopaedic surgeons survey re: cortisone

    ! 90% use cortisone !  73% injected plantar fascia in past yr

    ! 89% observed complication !  Subcutaneous fat atrophy (64%) !  Skin atrophy & pigment changes

    (54%) !  Tendon rupture (39%) !  Cartilage damage (20%) !  Infection (18%)

    Fadale & Wiggins 1994 J Am Acad Ortho Surg

  • Is a 3-phase bone scan a cortisone success prognosticator?

    ! 14/20 feet responding to injection had focal hyperemia on the blood-pool images

    ! None with diffuse uptake on the blood-pool images responded.

    (Frater 2006 J Nuclear Med)

  • Injecting cortisone

    !  Dose ~ 40 mg of methylprednisolone

    ~ 1 cc of most corticosteroid preparations

    + 2 cc anesthetic

    25 gauge 1.5” needles

  • Plantar fascia injection technique #1

    !  Advantage !  Easy to hit target

    !  Disadvantages !  Increased risk of heel fat pad

    atrophy

    !  Increased risk of plantar fascia rupture?

  • Plantar fascia injection technique #2

    ! Advantages ! Decreased risk of heel

    fat pad rupture ! Decreased risk of plantar

    fascia rupture?

    ! Disadvantages ! Greater chance of

    missing target !  Less effective?

    ! Ultrasound guidance?

  • Night splints

    !  Multiple trials including crossover and RCT show significant improvement !  4 positive; 1 no effect

  • Walking boot? !  Pilot study 16 subjects in randomized single

    blinded study

    !  Stretching vs. “SAS brace”

    !  No difference

    ! Sharma NK. 2010

  • Arch support

    !  Both taping & orthotics show increases in function &/or decreases VAS in most studies !  5 positive; 1 no effect

  • Orthotics vs. night splints

    ! RCT of 43 patients to foot orthosis, foot orthosis and night splint, or night splint alone.

    ! All patients had significant improvement on their Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores at 12 week and 1 year follow-up visits.

    ! The foot orthosis had significantly ! better pain reduction ! better compliance !  fewer side effects.

    (Roos 2006 Foot Ankle Intl)

  • Treatment

    !  Do nothing !  Most/many patients in control group of RCT eventually heal

    !  Key is proper framing

    !  Rest, ice, stretching, cross-friction massage

  • Shoe exam

    !  Beware of midshoe breakdown

    !  If shoe bends easily midsole instead of at MTP joint !  Cause overstretch of the plantar fascia with each footstep

  • Surgical

    !  Risks !  Infection, bleeding, pain !  Scarring, nerve damage !  Loss of arch

  • Surgical release

    ! Retrospective review of 22 consecutive patients with chronic plantar fasciitis & endoscopic plantar fascia release after at least 6 months postoperatively !  Satisfaction rate of 97.7% !  All patients reporting at least a 50% improvement in

    pain. !  Modified Mayo Foot and Ankle Score, 15 of 22 (68%)

    had good or excellent results

    (Hogan 2004 Foot & Ankle Intl).

  • Surgical release

    ! 32 patients endoscopic plantar fasciotomy. !  16 athletic patients all had results were excellent or

    good. !  Good or excellent results in the non-athletic group were

    obtained only in patients who walked for exercise !  All five patients with poor results having a BMI of more

    than 27

    (Saxena 2004 Foot & Ankl Intl)

  • Long term effects

    !  Change in center of pressure in gait analysis compared to non-operated foot (Tweed JL 2009)

  • “Newer” treatments

  • Deep tissue techniques

    !  A.R.T., ASTYM & Graston

    !  Theory !  Mechanical breakdown of scar tissue !  Stimulate healing cascade

  • Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ECSW)

    ! High energy shock waves generated ! Mechanical pressure & tension

    force plus trailing cavitation bubbles which collapse into “micro-jets” !  Both induce microtrauma

    !  Induces blood vessel formation !  Increased delivery of nutrients !  Increased dissolution of calcific

    deposits

  • ECSW

    ! Low-energy shock wave !  Series of three or more treatments. ! Minimal to mildly painful

    ! High-energy shock wave !  Single session. ! Quite painful - require anesthesia

    (regional block or general)

    ! Theory is to induce neovascularization & healing via creating localized inflammatory process

  • ECSW study results

    Favorable Neutral Rompe 2003 Speed 2003 Ogden 2004 Haake 2003 Kudo 2006 Hammer 2003 Wang 2006 Theodore 2004 Malay 2006 Greve 2009 Gerdesmeyer 2008 Ibrahim 2010

  • Intracorporeal pneumatic shock application

    !  50 patients in RCDB study

    !  6 month follow-up !  Excellent & Good outcomes (92%) vs.

    control group (24%) (P 

  • Prolotherapy – the theory

    !  Proliferates cause local irritation triggering inflammatory cascade !  Irritants (phenol, tannic acid) & particulates (pumice granules) !  Osmotic agents (zinc sulfate, dextrose, glycerin) !  Chemotactic attracters (cod liver extract/sodium morrhuate)

  • Prolotherapy – the evidence

    !  Limited & mixed

    !  Side effects – short-term stiffness & pain

    !  Not usually covered by insurance

    !  (Ryan 2009) - Dextrose 3 tx q 6wk in 20 patients; G+Ex in 75% no change in 25%

  • Autologous blood injection (also enriched platelet plasma)

    !  Rationale: stimulate acute healing cascade !  Via cellular and humoral

    mediators

    !  Procedure: 2cc of blood + 1cc lidocaine

  • Autologous blood injection

    !  RCT 44 patients treated with either autologous blood injection or methylprednisolone acetate.

    !  At the 6-month follow-up, both groups had similar significant decreases in VAS pain scores

    Kiter 2006 Am Pod Med Assoc

  • Autologous blood injection

    ! 16 patients !  Pain decreased from 7.13 to 2.75. !  Nirschl activity staging scale decreased from 6.19 to

    2.88. !  62% were able to resume strenuous activity

    !  70% that returned to strenuous activity could do so without pain.

    !  Nineteen percent reported no response to blood injection

    (Martin 2005 Clin J Sports Med)

  • Platelet rich plasma (PRP)

  • Platelet rich plasma (PRP)

  • Botox injection !  Theory

    !  Abductor hallucis & FHB are the injection sites.

    !  Increases flexibility of the plantar musculature.

    ! Mostly case reports !  (Babcock 2005) RCT Botox vs. Saline

    significant improvement in Pain @ 3 & 8 wks

    !  (Huang 2010) RDBC significant improvement in pain & decrease in PF thickness @ 3 & 12 weeks

  • Nitroglycerin patches ! Theory

    ! Dilates blood vessels leading to increased blood flow

    !  Increases levels of nitric oxide, which may stimulate healing

    ! Treatment regimen !  1/4 patch 0.2 mg/hr for 18-24° !  4/6 to 12+ week course

    ! Side effects – headache Paolini 2007, McCallum 2011

  • Cryosurgery: percutaneous denervation

    !  61 cases of chronic plantar fasciitis.

    !  Mean VAS 8.38 to 1.26 after 1 day

    !  After 1 year !  Mean VAS score was 1.26 !  32 heels being totally asymptomatic !  90% having a VAS score < 4. !  Three patients eventually needed surgery

    (Allen 2007 J Foot & Ankl Surg )

  • Radiofrequency nerve ablation

    !  22 patients

    !  VAS 8.12 initially

    !  3.26 after 1 week

    !  1.46 1 month

    !  1.96 3 months

    !  2.07 6 months

    !  No further changes at 1 year

    !  Liden B 2009

  • Prevention

    !  Primary !  Congenital

    !  Hypermobile medial column cavus !  Pronation of subtalar joint !  Low medial longitudinal arch

    !  Equinus foot !  Weak intrinsic foot muscles

    !  Secondary