Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
P/NW BOCES, 200 BOCES DRIVE, YORKTOWN HEIGHTS, NY 10598 914/248-2349 - fax # 914/248-3838 - email # [email protected] WEBSITE: http://www.pnwboces.org/artsined/
MICHELLE SHERER - ARTS COORDINATOR
August, 2009 Dear ARTS Representatives: This School Program Evaluation Book has been compiled from all the in-school Arts programs/events that were contracted through the Putnam/Northern Westchester Arts In Education Service during the 2008-2009 school year. HOW TO USE:
1. The Evaluations are in alphabetical order either by the first name or by the name of the company/organization.
2. The Evaluations were completed by participants who viewed the presentations.
3. In the majority of cases, there is at least one Evaluation for each in-school program/event.
4. In few cases, where several Evaluations were received for a single program/event, the responses were
combined and averaged out for each of the categories but all the comments were included. However, those Evaluations when the respondents’ views were widely different have been entered separately.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at: 914/248-2349 or email [email protected] I’m looking forward to another successful year working with you. Very truly yours, Michelle Sherer ☺ Arts In Education Coordinator
ARTS IN EDUCATION
10 SECONDS, INC. A4207AUTHOR VISIT - BOBBY PETROCELLI/10 SECONDS CAN CHANGE YOUR LIFE
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL9-12
4/2/0912001
5
55555
Y
THE ENTIRE PROGRAM WAS OUTSTANDING AND PROFESSIONALLY MANAGED.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO HAVING MR. PETROCELLI BACK NEXT YEAR.
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
MR. PETROCELLI IMMEDIATELY CONNECTED WITH 600 STUDENTS WHO WERE ENGAGED, PARTICIPATED IN A MEANINGFUL WAY, AND WERE TRULY MESMERIZED THROUGHOUT THE PROGRAM.
2 HANDS 2 LEARN A3424JUDY LEWIS - COLONIAL PAPERMAKING
CROTON/CET ELEM.4
6/2-4/097
5
55555
Y
THERE SHOULD BE ANOTHER STATION FOR STUDENTS WHO FINISH QUICKLY.
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
IT IS A FANTASTIC PROGRAM WHICH SUPPLEMENTS OUR SOCIAL STUDIES COLONIAL REVOLUTION TIME PERIOD.
2 HANDS 2 LEARN A3605AJUDY LEWIS - INUIT CULTURE
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.5
6/5/091301
4
55554
Y
NONE
LOOKING FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU AGAIN THE FUTURE.
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
SUPER ONCE AGAIN.
2 HANDS 2 LEARN A3384JUDY LEWIS - NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE & CRAFTS
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOLK
11/12/08802
5
5555
Y
NONE
THANK YOU.
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
JUDY LEWIS WAS WONDERFUL. THE STUDENTS LOVED THE THINGS SHE SHARED AND PARTICIPATED IN THE ACTIVITIES. THIS WORKSHOP WAS PERFECT FOR KINDERGARTEN.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 1 of 339
2 HANDS 2 LEARN A3473JUDY LEWIS - NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE & CRAFTS
EASTCHESTER/WAVERLY EARLY CHILDHOOD CTR1
11/14, 19-20/200821410
5
5555
Y
NONE
WE HOPE THEY WILL ALWAYS HAVE TIME FOR US EACH NOVEMBER!!
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE CHILDREN REALLY ENJOYED THE PROGRAM AND THE FACT THAT IT WAS SO INTIMATE, ONE LEADER PER CLASS AT A TIME, MAKES IT EVEN MORE SPECIAL.
2 HANDS 2 LEARN A3412JUDY LEWIS - NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURE & CRAFTS
YORKTOWN/MOHANSIC ELEM.K-2
11/3-18/083602
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THIS CONTINUESTO BE AN EXCELLENT PROGRAM THAT SUPPORTS OUR CURRICULUM.
2 HANDS 2 LEARN A3605BMARGARET VON DEMEDEN - MAYAN CULTURE
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.5
6/5/091301
4
55554
Y
NONE
THANKS FOR TAKING OUR RECOMMENDATIONS.
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
MUCH IMPROVED FROM LAST YEAR.
A VISION IN MOTION A3047BPAUL WICHANSKY - TAKING THE "DIS" OUT OF DISABILITY
CHAPPAQUA/SEVEN BRIDGES MIDDLE SCHOOL5
9/26/081
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
IT WAS INSPIRATIONAL.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 2 of 339
A VISION IN MOTION A3047APAUL WICHANSKY - TAKING THE "DIS" OUT OF DISABILITY
CHAPPAQUA/BELL MIDDLE SCHOOL5
9/26/081801
5
545
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
PAUL HAS COME TO OUR SCHOOL FOR FIVE YEARS AND IS WELL RECEIVED EACH TIME HE IS HERE.
ACADEMIC ENTERTAINMENT, INC. A3970NUTRITION, THE MAGIC OF 5 A DAY
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.3-5
3/16/092501
5
55554
Y
THE SHOW WAS GREAT.
WE LIKED THE WAY THE ARTIST COMPARED THE 5 A DAY FRUIT AND VEGETABLES TO MAGIC. GREAT MATERIALS
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED THROUGHOUT THE SHOW. AFTER THEY REMEMBERED THE KEY POINTS OF THE SHOW.
ACTOR'S WORKSHOPS A3393DENISE SIMON - KNITTING
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/MEADOWPOND ELEM.3-5
12/1/08-3/9/0971
4
5445
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE CHILDREN ENJOYED THIS PROGRAM.
ADAM ROTHFELD A3714PRODUCTION MANAGER & DIRECTOR FOR THE PLAY
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL9-12
12/19 & 20/081
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 3 of 339
ADAM ROTHFELD A3299PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR THE SHOW THE RIMERS OF ELDRIDGE
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL9-12
10/25-11/23/081
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
ADAM IS AN OUTSTANDING TEACHER AND ARTIST.
AGOSTINO & CO. PERFORMING ARTS, I A3556GOTCHA, DON'T BE FOOLED
MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL7 & 8
2/9/093005
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE GOTCHA PRESENTATION WAS WELL DONE. THE STUDENTS WERE ENGAGE THROUGHOUT.
AIJA R. SEARS A4307BOTANICAL ARTS
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.4
4/24-6/5/09651
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
AJKUN BALLET THEATRE A4268CHIARA AJKUN - DANCE / CREATIVITY MATTERS
NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS9-12
5/4-15/09801
4
5555
Y
NONE
I THINK USING A VARIETY OF CHOREOGRAPHERS WAS AN EXCELLENT IDEA.
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE AJKUN BALLET THEATRE IS AN INCREDIBLY PROFESSIONAL AND TALENTED GROUP OF DANCERS WHO PRESENTED EXCELLENT WORK.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 4 of 339
AJKUN BALLET THEATRE A3413CHIARA AJKUN - NUTCRACKER WORKSHOPS
NEW ROCHELLE/NEW ROCHELLE HS9-12
11/3-12/6/08601
3
34444
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
ALAN JEFFREY FRIEDBERG A3671BOSSY FROG SHOW
OSSINING/ROOSEVELTPRE K
1/20/092881
5
55554
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE CHILDREN WERE ENGAGED AND THOROUGHLY ENTERTAINED. PERFORMERS WERE FUN AND ENERGETIC AND GOT THE STUDENTS UP AND MOVING.
ALAN LOUNSBURY A4357MUSICIAN FOR THE SHOW HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL - ACT II
CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.2-4
5/27-31/091251
4
5455
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
ALAN WAS VERY PROFESSIONAL AND NICE TO WORK WITH. HE CAME PREPARED AND WAS VERY HELPFUL. THE CHILDREN REALLY RESPONDED TO HIM.
ALANNA LAUTER A4191ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR FOR HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL - ACT II
CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.2-4
4/14-5/31/091251
5
4454
Y
NONE
ALANNA WAS GREAT WITH THE STUDENTS. THEY REALLY RESPONDED TO HER.
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
I FEEL THAT ALL SCHOOLS SHOULD PUT ON A SHOW NO MATTER WHAT THE STUDENTS AGE.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 5 of 339
ALFRED A. RENNO, JR. A4213BASS PLAYER FOR SHOW CINDERELLA
OSSINING/OSSINING HIGH SCHOOLK-12
3/26-29/091
5
55555
Y
NONE
AL CONTINUES TO WORK ABOVE AND BEYOND THE CALL OF DUTY. WE ARE TRULY FORTUNATE TO HAVE HIM WORK WITH US.
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
ALFRED'S BASS PLAYING IS FIRST RATE. HIS ENTHUSIASM AND GENEROSITY WITH HIS TIME AND TALENT IS TRULY APPRECIATED BY THE COMMUNITY.
ALICIA E. MOTT A3718MUSICAL THEATRE
CHAPPAQUA/GRAFFLIN ELEM.3 & 4
1/16-3/20/0961
4
55545
Y
A DRAMA CLASS FOR YOUNGER STUDENTS WOULD BE POPULAR.
HOPE TO SEE YOU AGAIN NEXT YEAR.
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
GREAT DRAMATIC ART CLASS.
ALISON SHEARER A4103REED PLAYER FOR THE SHOW CHORUS LINE
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL9-12
3/26-28/095001
5
55555
Y
NONE
THANKS ALISON.
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO WORK WITH THIS ARTIST. HER TALENT AND PROFESSIONALISM ARE ALWAYS ON DISPLAY
ALLAN STRAUSS A3557BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW
MTP/WESTLAKE MIDDLE SCHOOL7 & 8
3/18/091
4
4.54.554
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE STUDENTS KNOWLEDGE WAS TESTED IN A FUN, FAST PACED GAME SHOW FORMAT. MOST OF THE STUDENTS PARTICIPATED AS CONTESTANTS.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 6 of 339
ALLEN STRAUSS A3873BRAIN CHALLENGE TV GAME SHOW
IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL4 & 5
3/26/093201
5
5555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
FUN, ENTERTAINING, AND ENGAGING.
ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION, INC. A4304ALVIN AILEY DANCE ASSEMBLY
NEW ROCHELLE/BARNARD EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTK-2
4/30/091
4
4555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
BEAUTIFUL, GRACEFUL MOVEMENTS THAT LET THE CHILDREN SEE A WARM-UP TO FINAL PERFORMANCE.
ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION, INC. A4331DANCE RESIDENCY
NEW ROCHELLE/JEFFERSON ELEM.K-5
5/28 & 29/095351
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY & ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
EXCELLENT - WONDERFUL.
ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION, INC. A3322DANCE RESIDENCY & PERFORMANCES
NEW ROCHELLE/WARD ELEM. SCHOOL2-5
10/27, 28 & 30/089001
5
55555
Y
NONE
THANKS FOR ANOTHER GREAT PERFORMANCE.
RESIDENCY & ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
IT WAS WONDERFUL, INTERACTIVE & EDUCATIONAL.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 7 of 339
ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC. A3949AUTHOR VISIT
BREWSTER/GARDEN STREET ELEM.K
3/13/091051
5
55555
Y
NONE
MS. CAPUCILLI BROUGHT FASCINATING MATERIALS TO SHOW STUDENTS HOW A PICTURE BOOK IS MADE. WE WOULD GLADLY WELCOME HER BACK.
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
MS. CAPUCILLI REALLY CONNECTS WITH YOUNG STUDENTS. SHE EXPLAINED IN EAST TO UNDERSTAND TERMS THE CREATIVE PROCESS INCLUDING SOURCES OF INSPIRATION HOW STORIES ARE DEVELOPED. HOW ILLUSTRATIONS ARE DEVELOPED AND THE PUBLISHING PROCESS.
ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC. A4353AUTHOR VISIT
PUTNAM VALLEY/PUTNAM VALLEY ELEM.1 & 2
6/4/093006
5
55555
Y
NONE
ONE OF THE BEST CHILDREN'S AUTHORS.
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
ALYSSA WAS FANTASTIC. SHE RELATES VERY WELL TO CHILDREN. SHE ENGAGES THEM FULLY IN HER PRESENTATION AND HAS GOOD MANAGEMENT AS WELL. GREAT CONTROL OF THE AUDIENCE. GREAT JOB CONNECTING WITH OUR WRITING WORKSHOP.
ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC. A4232AUTHOR VISIT
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/LEWISBORO ELEM.K-2
5/12/092001
5
555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
VERY MUCH.
ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC. A4215AUTHOR VISIT
SOMERS/PRIMROSE ELEM.K
4/14 & 15/092451
4
44555
Y
IT WOULD BE GREAT FOR ALYSSA TO SHOW SOME OF THE BEGINNING ILLUSTRATIONS AND WRITING FOR MRS. McTATS, ANOTHER FAVORITE
SHE WAS GREAT.
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
CHILDREN LOVE THE BISCUIT BOOKS AND ALYSSA CONNECTS TO THEM AS YOUNG READERS AND WRITERS.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 8 of 339
ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC. A4036AUTHOR VISIT
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.K
3/3/09191
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
ALYSSA WAS FABULOUS. MY STUDENTS WERE ENGAGED AND LOVED EVERY MINUTE OF IT. THANK YOU.
ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC. A3256AUTHOR VISIT
BRIARCLIFF/TODD ELEM.K & 1
10/28/082101
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC. A3998AUTHOR VISIT
NEW ROCHELLE/DANIEL WEBSTER ELEM.K-2
3/6/091
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
ALYSSA CONNECTS WELL WITH THE CHILDREN. SHE IS ENGAGING, AND PROVIDES A PROGRAM THAT BRINGS LITERATURE TO LIFE.
ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC. A4036AUTHOR VISIT
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.K
3/3/091
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE LENGTH OF THE PROGRAM WAS PERFECT FOR KINDERGARTENERS. SHE SPOKE TO THEM AT AN APPROPRIATE LEVEL AND PACE. SHE INVOLVED THEM AND WAS ENTHUSIASTIC.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 9 of 339
ALYSSA SATIN CAPUCILLI, INC. A3896AUTHOR VISIT
BREWSTER/JFK ELEM.K
3/12/091251
5
55555
Y
NONE
WE LOVE HAVING ALYSSA VISIT OUR SCHOOL AND HIGHLY RECOMMENT HER TO OTHER SCHOOLS.
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
ALYSSA WAS WONDERFUL, PERFECT FOR OUR KINDERGARTEN STUDENTS. THEY WERE ATTENTIVE AND ACTIVELY PARTICIPATED IN HER PRESENTATIONS.
AMADEUS MUSIC CONSERVATORY A3127MATTHEW LINDEN - GUITAR
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL4 & 5
9/22-12/1/08101
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
AMADEUS MUSIC CONSERVATORY A3778MICHAEL SHAPIRO - DRUMS
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/KATONAH ELEM. SCHOOL4 & 5
1/23-4/3/091
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
AMANDA PLUMMER A3443CHOREOGRAPHER FOR JAZZ CO.
TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL9-12
11/17/08-2/28/09201
3
5555
Y
NONE
EXCELLENT CHOREOGRAPHER.
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
MS. PLUMMER IS A CLASSICALLY TRAINED BALLERINA WHO BROUGHT A DIFFERENT ELEMENT TO OUR DANCE PROGRAM.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 10 of 339
AMERICAN BALLROOM THEATRE COMP A3705IVELISSE HORYAK - DANCING CLASSROOMS *BALLROOM DANCING
PELHAM/HUTCHINSON ELEM.5
12/16/08-3/6/09621
5
55555
Y
NONE
EXCELLENT PROGRAM--HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
I LOVED THE PROGRAM THIS YEAR. IT WAS EFFECTIVELY RUN AND CAPTURED THE CHILDRENS INTEREST AN ABSOLUTE DREAM.
AMERICAN GYMNASTICS A3766AMOVEMENT I
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.K-5
1/21-5/6/091
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
WE ALWAYS GET A GREAT RESPONSE FOR THEIR CLASS. THE CHILDREN REALLY SEEM TO ENJOY IT.
AMERICAN GYMNASTICS A3103ABMOVEMENT I & II
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.K-5
9/24/08-1/15/091
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE CHILDREN ENJOYED LEARNING AND BEING PHYSICALLY ACTIVE.
AMERICAN PLACE THEATRE A3661THE THINGS THEY CARRIED
LAKELAND/LAKELAND HIGH SCHOOL11
3/27/09250-301
4-
554-55
Y
LESS CONVERSATION "SET-UP" BEFORE PRESENTATION BEGINS - PERHAPS A SLIDE BACKGROUND THAT COULD ACCOMPANY TEXT WILL ENHANCE VISUALIZATION.
EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE BY ACTORS.
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4 X
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
A STRONG PRESENTATION OF KEY CHAPTERS IN THE BOOK, PRESENTED COGENTLY AND DRAMATICALLY TO ENHANCE STUDENT UNDERSTANDING.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 11 of 339
AMERICAN PROGRAM BUREAU A3568RACHEL SIMMON / AUTHOR VISIT - ODD GIRL OUT
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY MIDDLE/HIGH SCHO6-12
11/12/081202
5
55555
Y
PERHAPS A ONE HOUR PROGRAM WOULD WORK SO THAT IT COULD BE PRESENTED DURING THE ACADEMIC DAY.
MS. SIMMONS MADE A PROFOUND CONTRIBUTION TO OUR SCHOOL COMMUNITY.
ASSEMBLY & WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THIS PROGRAM WAS OUTSTANDING. PARENTS, STUDENTS, ADMINISTRATORS AND FACULTY WERE ENGAGED AND PARTICIPATED. THE LESSONS WERE COMPELLING, THOUGH PROVOKING, AND EVEN HUMOROUS.
AMERICAN PROGRAM BUREAU A3014BRACHEL SIMMON / AUTHOR VISIT - ODD GIRL OUT
IRVINGTON/MAIN STREET SCHOOL4-6
11/17/081
4
444
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
AMERICAN PROGRAM BUREAU A3014ARACHEL SIMMON / AUTHOR VISIT - ODD GIRL OUT
IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON HIGH SCHOOL9 & 10
11/17/081
4
44454
Y
NOT TO TRY SO HARD TO BE ON THE STUDENTS' LEVEL.
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
SHE WAS EFFECTIVE.
AMERICAN PROGRAM BUREAU A3014CRACHEL SIMMON / AUTHOR VISIT - ODD GIRL OUT
IRVINGTON/IRVINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL7 & 8
11/18/083281
3
33344
Y
TECHNIQUES FOR OLDER CHILDREN (STRATEGIES) COULD BE BETTER.
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
MORE APPLICABLE TO GIRLS THAN BOYS. BETTER FOR 6TH GRADERS THAN 7TH AND 8TH. PARENT PRESENTATION WAS EXCELLENT.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 12 of 339
AMY AXELROD, INC. A4041AUTHOR VISIT
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.1 & 2
3/30/091201
3
44333
N
IT WAS HARD TO SEE SOME SLIDES.
SOME CHILDREN HAD A HARD TIME SITTING AND LISTENING FOR SO LONG.
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
AMY AXELROD, INC. A4041AUTHOR VISIT
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.1 & 2
3/30/09201
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
SHE HELD STUDENTS ATTENTION AND SHARED GREAT INFORMATION.
AMY AXELROD, INC. A4041AUTHOR VISIT
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.1 & 2
3/30/091
5
55545
Y
MAKE SURE ALL STUDENTS CAN SEE THE SLIDES.
WE REALLY ENJOYED THIS PRESENTATION.
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THE CHILDREN LEARNED A LOT AND ENJOYED THE AUTHOR.
AMY AXELROD, INC. A4041AUTHOR VISIT
NORTH SALEM/PQ ELEM.1 & 2
3/30/091
2
22232
N
TOO WORDY FOR THIS AGE GROUP. SHORT AND SWEET WOULD BE BETTER.
NONE
ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
DIDN'T STIMULATE CHILDREN TO WANT TO WRITE.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 13 of 339
AMY MILLER A3631BMIXED MEDIA ART
CHAPPAQUA/ROARING BROOK ELEM.K-2
1/14-3/11/091
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
AMY IS A GREAT TEACHER. SHE IS ENERGETIC, CREATIVE AND VERY ENTHUSIASTIC. SHE PREPARED A GREAT CURRICULUM AND A GREAT CLASS.
AMY WIEGAND A3933ADVERTISING WORKSHOP FOR THE SHOW CHORUS LINE
KATONAH/LEWISBORO/JOHN JAY HIGH SCHOOL9-12
2/27-3/2/8/09151
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
AMY WORKS WELL WITH STUDENTS AND KNOWS HER BUSINESS.
ANAT NAPP A3575SCRAPBOOKING
CHAPPAQUA/WESTORCHARD ELEM.2-5
1/12-3/9/0951
4
545
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
STUDENTS WERE INTRODUCED TO SCRAPBOOKING AND EXPERIMENTED WITH DIFFERENT SCRAPBOOKING TECHNIQUES AND THEMES.
ANDREA HOMER-MacDONALD A3993CHOREOGRAPHY RESIDENCY
PELHAM/COLONIAL ELEM.2
2/25-3/27/09571
5
55555
Y
NONE
THE STUDENTS LOVE HER AND CAME TO CLASS EXCITED. MANY STUDENTS SURPRISED ME BY THEIR REACTION TO DANCING. IT WAS A WONDERFUL EXPERIENCE FOR EVERYONE.
RESIDENCY & ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
THIS PROGRAM INTEGRATES AN INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF CURRICULUM FROM A SOCIAL STUDIES UNIT ON COMMUNITIES BY INCORPORATING THE LOUIS ARMSTRONG AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSIC UNIT ALONGSIDE THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION MOVEMENT. AND IT GAVE THE STUDENTS THE OWNERSHIP OF THE CREATION OF THE DAY.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 14 of 339
ANDREA HOMER-MacDONALD A3962CHOREOGRAPHY RESIDENCY
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.3
3/16-4/1/09631
4
5555
Y
NONE
WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING HER AGAIN NEXT YEAR.
RESIDENCY & ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
MRS. HOMER HAS AN AMAZING WAY WITH CHILDREN. SHE IS VERY TALENTED AND BRINGS OUT THE TALENTS OF THE CHILDREN.
ANDREA HOMER-MacDONALD A3807CHOREOGRAPHY RESIDENCY
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.2
1/5-2/11/09332
5
55544
Y
NONE
THE PROGRAM WAS AMAZING. ANDREA WORKED SOLO WITH STUDENTS AND THE PERFORMANCE WAS OUTSTANDING.
RESIDENCY & ASSEMBLY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
ANDREA IS SO CREATIVE AND PATIENT. SHE WORKED WITH US, AND THE TEACHERS, ON THE PLANNING OF THE PERFORMANCE AND HAD THE CHILDREN CREATE FROM SCRATCH THE ENTIRE DANCE. HER PATIENCE AND MANAGEMENT ARE ADMIRED. THE DANCE DISPLAYED WHAT WE ARE LEARNING IN THE CLASS.
ANDREA KANTROWITZ A4324PORTRAIT ARTIST
PELHAM/PELHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL7
5/5, 19 & 6/9/091
5
55555
Y
NONE
ANDREA IS RELIABLE AND AN EXTREMELY SKILLED ARTIST. THIS WAS A GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR THE STUDENTS. I'VE ALREADY USED SOME OF THE SUGGESTIONS SHE MADE TO STRENGHTEN OUR PROGRAM.
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
AUDREA'S RESIDENCY WAS PART OF OUR CAREERS IN ART PROGRAM. IT'S IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS TO SEE THE REAL WORLD APPLICATIONS OF WHAT THEY LEARN IN THE CLASSROOM.
ANDREW COOMBS A4166CERAMIC POTTERY ARTIST
BYRAM HILLS/BYRAM HILLS HIGH SCHOOL9-12
3/30 & 31/09581
4
5555
Y
NONE
ARTIST WAS EXTREMELY WELL PREPARED WITH MATERIALS FOR DEMO AND GENEROUSLY LEFT DEMO PIECES FOR US TO USE IN TEACHING.
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
WE SOUGHT ANDREW BECAUSE OF A RECOMMENDATION ABOUT HIM AND HIS WORK. NO SUPPORT MATERIALS NEEDED OR PROVIDED ALTHOUGH ARTIST WEB SITE WAS A VALUABLE PREVIEW.
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 15 of 339
ANDREW EMERY A3849CREATIVE CARPENTRY CAR DESIGNS
PELHAM/SIWANOY ELEM.K-2
1/26-3/23/0981
5
555
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 X STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
ANDREW GMOSER dba SILENT G PROD A3867LIGHTING DESIGNER & TECHNICAL ADVISOR FOR JAZZ CO.
TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE HIGH SCHOOL9-12
2/25-28/09501
5
5555
Y
NONE
NONE
WORKSHOP
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
ANDREW GMOSER dba SILENT G PROD A4070LIGHTING DESIGNER & TECHNICAL ADVISOR FOR ONCE ON THIS ISLAND
TUCKAHOE/TUCKAHOE MS & HS6-12
3/16-21/091
5
55555
Y
NONE
EXCELLENT PRODUCTION.
ASSEMBLY & RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
ANDREW GMOSER dba SILENT G PROD A3135LIGHTING DESIGNER FOR AN EVENING OF DANCE
YORKTOWN/YORKTOWN HIGH SCHOOL9-12
1/26-31/091101
5
55555
Y
NONE
IT WAS GREAT.
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
NONE
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 16 of 339
ANGELA REID A3957CHOREOGRAPHER FOR THE SHOW 42 STREET
GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS7-12
2/2-3/14/09201
5
5555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
MS. REID IS AN OUTSTANDING CHOREOGRAPHER AND TEACHER AND HAS A GREAT RAPORT WITH THE STUDENTS.
ANGELA REID A3071B/2DANCE RESIDENCY
GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS7-9 & 12
11/3-28/08151
5
5555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
WONDERFUL RAPPORT WITH STUDENTS.
ANGELA REID A3071A1DANCE RESIDENCY
GREENBURGH #7/R.J. BAILEY ES4 & 5
9/29-10/31/081
5
5555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
MS. REID IS AN EXCELLENT TEACHER/ARTIST. SHE RELATES VERY WELL TO THE STUDENTS.
ANGELA REID A3071A4DANCE RESIDENCY
GREENBURGH #7/R.J. BAILEY ES4 & 5
1/5-31/09701
5
5555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
EXCELLENT!
Arts in Education Service - School Evaluations 2008-2009Page 17 of 339
ANGELA REID A3071DANCE RESIDENCY
GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS7 & 8
4/30/09151
5
55555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY ......................................................4. ARTISTIC INTERACTION WITH STUDENTS .........................5. TECHNICAL QUALITY OF PROGRAM ...................................6. QUALITY OF STUDY GUIDE/SUPPORT MATERIALS ............
7. WOULD YOU RECOMMEND THIS PROGRAM?
8. SUGGESTIONS TO ARTIST FOR IMPROVEMENT:
9. OTHER COMMENTS:
TYPE OF PROGRAM:
1 = POOR 2 = FAIR 3 = GOOD 4 = VERY GOOD 5 = EXCELLENT
WHY?
STANDARD X STANDARD 2 STANDARD X STANDARD 4
NEW YORK STATE ARTS STANDARDS ADDRESSED BY THIS PROGRAM
EXCELLENT
ANGELA REID A3071B4DANCE RESIDENCY
GREENBURGH #7/WOODLANDS MS/HS7 & 8
1/5-31/09151
5
5555
Y
NONE
NONE
RESIDENCY
ARTIST:TITLE OF PROGRAM:
CONTRACT #:
DISTRICT/ SCHOOL:# OF TEACHERS: # OF STUDENTS: GRADE(S)DATE(S) OF PERFORMANCE
1. STUDENTS RESPONSE .......................................................2. ARTISTIC QUALITY ...............................................................3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY .......