Police & Crime CommissionerPerformance Monitoring Group

2013/14 Quarter 3

25th February 2014

Contents

Part One: OPEN

1 Priorities & Targets / HMIC Programme of Work2 Crime & Antisocial Behaviour3 Neighbourhood Policing4 Hate Crime5 Organisational Priorities6 Public Safety (OPEN)

Part Two: CLOSED

6 Public Safety (CLOSED)7 Serious & Organised Crime

1.2 Strategic Priorities & Targets 2013/14Priority Outcomes

1. Reduce Crime and Anti Social Behaviour (ASB)Reduce All Crime, Violence, Burglary Dwelling, Robbery & ASB. Increase the Crime Outcome rate (Burglary Dwelling & Robbery).

2. Provide a visible and accessible Neighbourhood Policing StyleMaintain Victim Satisfaction.

3. Tackle Serious and Organised Crime Reduce Firearms Discharges.

4. Maintain Public SafetyIncrease Crime Outcomes for Domestic Abuse & Rape. Reduce fatal KSIs, Maintain Detainee Management.

5. Take Effective Action against all forms of Hate CrimeIncrease Crime Outcomes and monitor the various stands.

1.3 2013/14 Crime & Outcome Targets

Crime• All Crime• ASB• Burglary Dwelling• Robbery• Violence (-2%)

Sanction Detections• Increase Burglary Dwelling SD rate (17%)• Increase Robbery SD rate (25%)• Hate Crime• Domestic Abuse• Rape

BCUs (Crime)• Knowsley – UTMV (-11.2%) and TFMV (-2.2%)• Liv North – Other Stealing (-7.5%)• Liv South – TFMV (-4.4%)

Force

Increase Crime Outcome Rates (based on 2012/13 YE)

Reduce

Firearms Discharges• Firearms Discharges (-15%)

1.4 HMIC Inspection Programme

•Data Integrity•YOT St Helens•Making Best Use of Police Time•Child Protection•Valuing the Police 4•Police Leadership & Integrity•Stop Search•SPR•All Force Inspection

Crime & ASB

2.1 Crime & ASBCrime Tree (compared to target / comparator)

2.2 Crime & ASBCrime Tree (compared to previous year)

2.3 Crime & ASBOverall Crime

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 69374vs Target 2.5% vs Apr-Dec 12 3.2%MSF Position 3 12 Month Trend Increasing

2.4 Crime & ASBOverall Crime

Short Term

Target Act Diff % Diff

A 10834 12029 1195 11.0%

B 11228 11294 66 0.6%

C 6616 6746 130 2.0%

D 7480 7658 178 2.4%

E 22447 22646 199 0.9%

F 9049 9001 -48 -0.5%

Force 67663 69374 1711 2.5%

2.5 Crime & ASBDomestic Burglary

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 4708vs Target -1.2% vs Apr-Dec 12 -1.2%MSF Position 3 12 Month Trend Seasonal

2.6 Crime & ASBDomestic Burglary

Short Term

Target Act Diff % Diff

A 647 621 -26 -4.0%

B 991 866 -125 -12.6%

C 402 355 -47 -11.7%

D 474 466 -8 -1.7%

E 1433 1614 181 12.6%

F 815 786 -29 -3.6%

Force 4765 4708 -57 -1.2%

2.7 Crime & ASBRobbery

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 851vs Target 0.1% vs Apr-Dec 12 1.9%MSF Position 5 12 Month Trend Seasonal

2.8 Crime & ASBRobbery

Short Term

Target Act Diff % Diff

A 82 65 -17 -20.7%

B 111 101 -10 -9.0%

C 62 56 -6 -9.7%

D 46 43 -3 -6.5%

E 427 426 -1 -0.2%

F 120 160 40 33.3%

Force 850 851 1 0.1%

2.9 Crime & ASBViolence

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 9463vs Target 16.5% vs Apr-Dec 12 14.6%MSF Position 3 12 Month Trend Increasing

2.10 Crime & ASBViolence

Short Term

Target Act Diff % Diff

A 1699 2012 313 18.4%

B 1391 1405 14 1.0%

C 633 829 196 31.0%

D 845 998 153 18.1%

E 2632 3118 486 18.5%

F 922 1101 179 19.4%

Force 8125 9463 1338 16.5%

2.11 Crime & ASBASB incidents

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 46386vs Target -2.2% vs Apr-Dec 12 -2.1%MSF Position n/a12 Month Trend Seasonal

2.12 Crime & ASBASB incidents

Short Term

Target Act Diff % Diff

A 10119 10278 159 1.6%

B 7530 7221 -309 -4.1%

C 4874 5014 140 2.9%

D 5000 4439 -561 -11.2%

E 14412 14145 -267 -1.9%

F 5497 5288 -209 -3.8%

Force 47435 46385 -1050 -2.2%

2.13 Crime & ASBDomestic Burglary Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Vol. %Charges / Summons 422 61.9%Cautions / Warnings 14 2.1%

FPN 0 0.0%TIC 241 35.3%

Cannabis Warnings 0 0.0%Community Resolutions 5 0.7%Total Crime Outcomes 682 100.0%

Police Discretion 0

Apr - Dec 13

Apr-Dec 13 14.5% vs Target -2.5 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 4.4 ppMSF Position 412 Month Trend Stable

2.14 Crime & ASBDomestic Burglary Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Sanc Det Com Res Cr Out % % Pt Diff PDR

A 126 1 20.45% 0.85% 0

B 144 3 16.97% -0.03% 0

C 70 0 19.72% 0.12% 0

D 91 0 19.53% -0.07% 0

E 172 1 10.72% -4.28% 0

F 74 0 9.41% -7.59% 0

Force 677 5 14.49% -2.51% 0

2.15 Crime & ASBRobbery Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 22.7% vs Target -2.3 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 1.0 ppMSF Position 612 Month Trend Stable

2.16 Crime & ASBRobbery Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Sanc Det Com Res Cr Out % % Pt Diff PDR

A 22 0 33.85% 8.55% 0

B 30 0 29.70% 4.40% 0

C 19 0 33.93% 6.43% 0

D 20 0 46.51% 16.41% 0

E 68 1 16.20% -8.10% 0

F 33 0 20.63% -6.28% 0

Force 192 1 22.68% -2.32% 0

2.17 Crime & ASBOverall Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Vol. %Charges / Summons 12,923 57.6%Cautions / Warnings 2,596 11.6%

FPN 2,454 10.9%TIC 483 2.2%

Cannabis Warnings 1,849 8.2%Community Resolutions 2,125 9.5%Total Crime Outcomes 22,430 100.0%

Police Discretion 1416

Apr - Dec 13

Apr-Dec 13 32.3% vs Comparator -0.9 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 -1.4 ppMSF Position 312 Month Trend Stable

2.18 Crime & ASBOverall Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Sanc Det Com Res Cr Out % % Pt Diff PDR

A 3756 466 35.10% -3.35% 216

B 3652 338 35.33% 1.64% 293

C 2148 272 35.87% 1.49% 89

D 2280 242 32.93% -0.42% 209

E 5636 371 26.53% -3.04% 469

F 2837 436 36.36% 2.00% 140

Force 20309 2125 32.34% -0.84% 1416

2.19 Crime & ASBRetail Crime Update - Concerns

Short Term

Force Risk Business Robbery

Liverpool NorthSeftonLiverpool South

Shoplifting8,516 crimes YTD

11.1% of All Crime17.7% over targetTop 10 BCUs Offenders & Locations targetedImprovement since last quarter

2.20 Crime & ASBRetail Crime Update – Current Tactics

Short Term

Focus of Work– BCU & Force unified approach– Prevention – Catania & Anterers

Best Practice– Locally Regionally & Nationally

Forensic Marking Project

Premises– Target-harden – Reasons why?– Solutions

Offenders– Drivers – Intelligence– Disposals

Companies– Engagement– Initiatives

2.21 Crime & ASBRetail Crime Update – Next Steps

Short Term

Prevention Partnership workingProblem SolvingAffordabilitySustainability

Continued LiaisonInternal & External stakeholders

ACC PillingPCC’s OfficeArea CommandersSDD

Repeat ASB Callers: Oct - Dec 13

2.22 Crime & ASBRepeat Victimisation

BCU Caller Address VolumeLiv North Staff Park 19Knowsley Staff Housing Association Property 19Liv North Staff Family Run Shop 18Liv North Staff Transport Provider 18Liv North Staff Sheltered Accomodation 17

2.23 Crime & ASBStop and Search: Trends

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Jan-

13

Feb

-13

Mar

-13

Apr

-13

May

-13

Jun-

13

Jul-1

3

Aug

-13

Sep

-13

Oct

-13

Nov

-13

Dec

-13

Stop Searches

2.24 Crime & ASBStop and Search: Ethnic Disproportionality

2.25 Crime & ASBDetainee Management – Case Progression

Medium Term

• TQ1s – First Appearance File Quality (Target 85%) – Performance has been fairly stable this year across all BCUs with every BCU meeting target.

• Current performance at 93.1%. All BCUs have met target YTD.

• TQ2 – Full File Quality (Target 85%) – There has been a steady improvement in performance in this financial year. Current performance at 92.1%. All BCUs have met target in past quarter.

2.26 Crime & ASBDetainee Management – Warrants

Medium Term

Category A Warrants – Target 70% to be executed within 14 days.• Current performance for December 13 – 85%

Category B Warrants – Target 75% to be executed within 21 days.• Performance has remained stable over the past 12 months. Current

performance for December 13 – 84%

2.27 Crime & ASBDetainee Management – Licence Recalls

Medium Term

Emergency Recalls – Target 75% to be arrested within 48 hrs of revoke. • Current performance – A total of 13 Emergency Recalls issued, 10 of

which (77%) have met target.• Performance for December 2013 is better than target at 100%.

Standard Recalls – Target 75% to be arrested within 96 hrs of revoke. • Current performance – A total of 120 Standard Recalls issued, 70 of

which (58%) have met target.• Performance for December 2013 is worse than target at 73%.

2.28 Crime & ASBDetainee Management – Bail Management

Medium Term

Merseyside Police currently has 2,865 distinct individuals out on bail.

Primary Arrest Disposals • Target is <25% to be bailed on primary arrest. • Performance YTD at 25.6%.

Return Disposals • Target is >65% not to be re-bailed on any non-primary arrest. • Performance YTD at 75.2%.

2.29 Crime & ASBVoluntary Attendance (VA)

Medium Term

• There have been a total of 4,564 Voluntary attendee interviews Force wide since its introduction on 12th November 2012.

• Of the 4,368 disposals, 3,319 (76%) have a final result and the remaining volume have interim results e.g. VA Departed-Awaiting Disposal Decision.

VA Final Disposals Volume %All Final Disposals 3,319

NFA 1924 58%Caution 328 10%

Postal Charge 527 16%RJ 135 4%

Summons/Postal Requisition 230 7%Charge 102 3%

Cannabis Warning 10 0%Bailed 9 0%Other 54 2%

2.30 Crime & ASBFirst Time Entrants to the Criminal Justice System (CJS)

Medium Term

Oct-10 to Dec-10

Jan-11 to Mar-11

Apr-11 to Jun-11

Jul-11 to Sep-11

Oct-11 to Dec-11

Jan-12 to Mar-12

Apr-12 to Jun-12

Jul-12 to Sep-12

Oct-12 to Dec-12

Jan-13 to Mar-13

Apr-13 to Jun-13

Jul-13 to Sep-13

Value [Annual] Direction

Oct-12 to Sep-13 N/A

Knowsley YOT 24 25 22 26 19 22 22 23 18 15 15 15 109 Info Only 63Liverpool YOT 54 46 67 62 42 42 44 26 35 27 42 39 265 Info Only 143

Sefton YOT 67 46 77 50 59 23 25 32 35 22 23 32 256 Info Only 112St Helens YOT 14 43 16 24 10 18 11 29 11 11 11 18 110 Info Only 51

Wirral YOT 44 39 51 60 60 43 41 39 24 27 24 36 202 Info Only 111Merseyside 203 199 233 222 190 148 143 149 123 102 115 140 942 Info Only 480

2.31 Crime & ASBDrug & Alcohol Abuse

Long Term

•Probation developing Merseyside IOM Strategy through MCJB. CI Thornton working on this full time for police to deliver consistent approach.

•Need to achieve more focus on alcohol. Driver for violence which is an area of threat. Pivotal to managing violence repeat offenders.

•Improved service provision through joint commissioning?

•Pilot ongoing to drugs test violence offenders. Currently showing over 30% positive for cocaine.

NeighbourhoodPolicing

3.1 Neighbourhood PolicingOverall Victim Satisfaction with Service

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 87.0%vs Target -1.8 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 -1.7 ppMSF Position 2 12 Month Trend Decreasing

3.2 Neighbourhood PolicingBRM Victim Satisfaction Gap

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 5.2 ppvs Comparator -4.3 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 -14.0 ppMSF Position 7 12 Month Trend Decreasing

3.3 Neighbourhood PolicingGrade 1 Incident Attendance

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 95.4% vs Target 5.4 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 -0.8 ppMSF Position n/a12 Month Trend Stable

3.4 Neighbourhood PolicingCommunity Intelligence• Between November and December 2013 there have been 448 calls to Crimestoppers

(30% decrease on same period last year). This has resulted in the arrest/charge or caution of 79 individuals (22% increase on same period last year).

• Continued drive in terms of distribution of Crimestoppers literature at all Pivot and Community Meetings.

• In the process of compiling a Crimestoppers campaign calendar to target seasonal disorder and crime patterns.

• St Helens Town Hall: Secondary Democracy Debate 2013 – Safety First Presentation to High School staff from a number of schools in and around the St Helens area.

• Significant results during this period:- Cannabis farm – Pensby Hotel, Ridgewood Drive, Pensby- Male wanted

3.5 Neighbourhood PolicingPublic Confidence

Long Term

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Nor

thum

bria

Gre

ater

Man

ches

ter

Mer

seys

ide

Cle

vela

nd

Wes

t Yor

kshi

re

Wes

t M

idla

nds

Sou

th Y

orks

hire

Data is strictly for internal management information only.

MSG Average MSG Average Confidence Interval

Oct 12 - Sep 13 62.9% vs Oct 11-Sep 12 1.3 ppMSF Position 3 12 Month Trend Stable

Long Term

3.6 Neighbourhood PolicingNeighbourhood Policing Review

Status

• Wirral implemented the new model fully on 16th October 2013.• The other BCUs implemented the model on 11th November 2013.• Implementation of all the I.T. changes took place successfully on 19 th January 2014.• All staff changes have now taken place and PCSTO recruitment has brought the number of

PCSTOs in the force to 295. With recruitment and wastage the projected number by 31/3/14 will be 314.

Outstanding Issues

• There are no other outstanding issues or identified risks to the project.• There will be a 90-day review of the new neighbourhood shift patterns, carried out as part of the the

SEP Phase 5 Review of Shift Patterns.

PCSTO Powers

• All PCSTOs have received training in their new powers.• They have been designated on 1st January 2014, with powers to search for alcohol and tobacco and

other interventions to increase their effectiveness.• Their JDQ and Guidelines for Deployment documents have been updated to reflect the changes to

their powers.

Hate Crime

4.1 Hate CrimeHate Crime

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 1256vs Comparator 19.5% vs Apr-Dec 12 15.3%MSF Position n/a12 Month Trend Increasing

4.2 Hate CrimeHate Crime Repeat Victimisation

Short Term

• Repeat victims engaged by Hate Crime Co-ordinator or Neighbourhood Team to provide support, make an assessment and provide target hardening advice if appropriate.

• Referral to the regular Hate Crime partnership groups to provide support and target hardening measures such as CCTV and fire risk assessment.

• Risk status (High/medium/low) determined by Knowsley and Liverpool North. Only those assessed as High/medium risk referred to MARAC.

• St Helens – N’hood supervision and staff made aware of HC victims weekly. All victims receive additional reassurance visits and HVP is increased in the area.

• Appropriate support services available explained to the victim and contact facilitated.

Repeats All Victims Repeat RateHate Crime 28 149 18.8%

4.3 Hate CrimeHate Crime Outcome Rate

Medium Term

Once identified as a Hate Crime, the investigation is passed to the appropriate SIGMA team within each BCU. SIGMA teams then progress the investigation, provide support, make an assessment of the individual victim’s circumstances and provide target hardening advice if

appropriate.

Apr-Dec 13 40.2% vs Target -1.4 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 0.6 ppMSF Position n/a12 Month Trend Stable

4.4 Hate CrimeThird Party Hate Crime Reporting

Medium Term

• 3rd Party Reporting Options – Paper submitted to COG

• CEU assisting MFRS / Probation / Daisy UK

• Transgender Forum

• Muslim Womens’ Coffee Mornings

• L8 IAG (Toxteth Advisory Group)

4.5 Hate CrimeCommunity Awareness and Education

Long Term

• Arabic language crime prevention forms• Training programme• MIAG Involvement• Cultural calendar / hate crime posters• Twitter• Walk of Light• Homeless Kitchen• Polish language reassurance leaflets

OrganisationalPriorities

5.1 Organisational PrioritiesHR- Establishment (current & future)

Projected Police Officer figures includes an additional 220 Budgeted FTE Constables for 2013/14

Projected Police Staff figures includes the deduction 11.00 FTE confirmed leavers and 2.00 FTE confirmed VER/VR before 31.03.2014

5.2 Organisational PrioritiesHR- Measures to achieve 2013/14 Establishment

• Ambition 4,000 target for Police Officers

• Recruitment schedule – 155 student officers recruited since June 2013 and a further 66 scheduled for 2013/14. A further 16 transferees were recruited in December 2013.

• Police Staff - Business change reductions through the Sustaining Excellence Programme

• PCS&TOs – As a result of the Police Officer recruitment process and to address current vacancies, a further 40 PCS&TO are scheduled to be recruited before the end of the financial year, with the first intake in January 2014 and the second in March 2014.

5.3 Organisational PrioritiesHR – Police Officer Sickness

Police Officer 12 Month Totals for Sickness Absence Hours Rate Against Target of 3.5%

2013/Apr 2013/May 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2012/Oct 2012/Nov 2012/Dec 2013/Jan 2013/Feb 2013/Mar YTD

Female 5.2% 3.9% 4.0% 4.2% 3.4% 3.4% 3.8% 4.5% 4.7% 4.1%

Male 3.4% 3.3% 3.2% 3.4% 2.8% 2.9% 3.1% 3.1% 3.6% 3.2%

All Genders 3.9% 3.5% 3.4% 3.6% 2.9% 3.0% 3.3% 3.5% 3.9% 3.4%Annual Target 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5%3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.5% 3.8% 3.9% 3.7% 3.5% 3.4% 3.5%

0.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.037666

Police Staff 12 Month Totals for Sickness Absence Hours Rate Against Target of 4%

HO Absence Hours Rate 2013/Apr 2013/May 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep

Annual Target 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%3.7% 3.6% 3.6% 4.0% 3.8% 3.8% 4.1% 4.4% 4.5% 4.4% 4.2% 3.9% 3.9%

3.7% 3.6% 3.6% 4.0% 3.8% 3.8% 4.1% 4.4% 4.5% 4.4% 4.2% 3.9%

0.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.039206

FORCE TOTAL FOR POLICE OFFICERS

HO Absence Hours Rate

Seasonalized Target Guide

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%

2013/Apr 2013/M ay 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2012/Oct 2012/Nov 2012/Dec 2013/Jan 2013/Feb 2013/M ar

Female

M ale

All G end ers

Ann ual Targe t

Season aliz ed Target Gu id e

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%

2013/Apr 2013/M ay 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2012/Oct 2012/Nov 2012/Dec 2013/Jan 2013/Feb 2013/M ar

Female

M ale

All G end ers

Ann ual Targe t

Season aliz ed Target Gu id e

Apr-Dec 13 3.4% vs Target -0.1 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 -1.4 ppMSF Position 5 12 Month Trend Seasonal

5.4 Organisational PrioritiesHR- Police Staff Sickness

Police Officer 12 Month Totals for Sickness Absence Hours Rate Against Target of 3.5%

2013/Apr 2013/May 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep

3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.5% 3.8% 3.9% 3.7% 3.5% 3.4% 3.5%

0.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.0376660.032696 0.033136 0.033373 0.034032 0.034443 0.033647 0.035045 0.037666

Police Staff 12 Month Totals for Sickness Absence Hours Rate Against Target of 4%

HO Absence Hours Rate 2013/Apr 2013/May 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2012/Oct 2012/Nov 2012/Dec 2013/Jan 2013/Feb 2013/Mar YTD

Female 4.3% 4.1% 4.4% 4.0% 3.5% 4.0% 4.8% 5.2% 5.1% 4.4%

Male 3.3% 3.0% 3.3% 2.8% 2.3% 3.7% 2.7% 1.7% 1.9% 2.7%

All Genders 3.9% 3.7% 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 3.9% 3.9% 3.8% 3.8% 3.7%Annual Target 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%

3.7% 3.6% 3.6% 4.0% 3.8% 3.8% 4.1% 4.4% 4.5% 4.4% 4.2% 3.9% 3.9%

3.7% 3.6% 3.6% 4.0% 3.8% 3.8% 4.1% 4.4% 4.5% 4.4% 4.2% 3.9%

0.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.0392060.037254 0.036267 0.036217 0.039842 0.037787 0.037646 0.040594 0.043711 0.04524 0.044191 0.042046 0.039206

FORCE TOTAL FOR POLICE

STAFF

Seasonalized Target Guide

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%

2013/Apr 2013/M ay 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2012/Oct 2012/Nov 2012/Dec 2013/Jan 2013/Feb 2013/M ar

Female

M ale

All G end ers

Ann ual Targe t

Season aliz ed Target Gu id e

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

4.5%

5.0%

5.5%

2013/Apr 2013/M ay 2013/Jun 2013/Jul 2013/Aug 2013/Sep 2012/Oct 2012/Nov 2012/Dec 2013/Jan 2013/Feb 2013/M ar

Female

M ale

All G end ers

Ann ual Targe t

Season aliz ed Target Gu id e

Apr-Dec 13 3.7% vs Target -0.3 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 -0.4 ppMSF Position 3 12 Month Trend Seasonal

5.5 Organisational PrioritiesEquality & Diversity: Police Officer Establishment

Group Number PercentAll Individuals 4,011 100%

Male 2933 73%Female 1,078 27%White 3846 96%BRM 136 3%

Disabled 13 0%LGB 73 2%

Religious Affiliation 2,086 52%Transgender 2 0%

5.6 Organisational PrioritiesEquality & Diversity: Police Staff Establishment

Group Number PercentAll Individuals 2,305 100%

Male 874 38%Female 1,431 62%White 2260 98%BRM 36 2%

Disabled 46 2%LGB 29 1%

Religious Affiliation 1,075 47%Transgender 0 0%

5.7 Organisational PrioritiesFinance- Revenue Budget Monitoring

Original Estimate 31st March 2014

Forecast Outturn 31st March 2014

Forecast Under-spend 2013/14 Variance (%)

£322.4 £317.1 £5.3m 1.6%

• Forecast underspend for the year of £5.3m mainly due to vacancies arising from structural change.

• Chief Officers have agreed to utilise these vacancy savings to support Ambition 4000 throughout the current CSR.

• Under-spend position includes re-organisation costs of £3.4m.

5.8 Organisational PrioritiesFinance- Capital Budget

Revised Estimate* Revised Budget 2013/14*

Forecast Outturn 31st March 2014

Underspend

IT/Technical £5.1m £3.2m £1.9m

Estates £12.6m £4.4m £8.2m

Fleet £3.9m £3.1m £0.8m

Total £21.6m £10.7m £10.9m* includes re-phased projects from 2012/13

• The original capital budget of £19.040m contained within the 2013/14 budget report has now been updated to include the re-phasing agreed as part of the 2012/13 closedown process with a resulting budget of £21.6m

• Total capital expenditure to the end of December 2013 was £6.6m with a forecast outturn to the end of March 2014 of £10.7m.

• The largest area of underspend relates to the Estate Strategy which has seen some significant change since the original budget was agreed.

5.9 Organisational Priorities Finance - Savings Targets

• Savings targets within the 2013/14 MTFS are expected to be exceeded by £5.1m as a result of initiatives originally scheduled for 2014/15 being implemented ahead of plan.

• Overall targeted savings to the end of 2014/15 anticipated as being achievable in full.

• The savings targets for 2015/16 and 2016/17 have now been revised to reflect the October CSR with a shortfalls of £17.3m and £16.9m respectively.

5.10 Organisational PrioritiesFinance-– MTFS 2014/15 Budget Report

2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 TOTAL

Budget Shortfall £12.7m £17.3m £16.9m £6.8m £53.7m

Savings Identified (£12.7m) - - - (£12.7m)

Savings to be Identified £0.0m £17.3m £16.9m £6.8m £41.0m

• Funding for 2014/15 has now been confirmed and the shortfall in budget has been addressed through the SEP savings programme and use of the PCSO reserve.

• On 26th June 2013 the Government announced plans to make further budget cuts in 2015/16 and 2016/17and indications are that Merseyside Police will be required to save a further £34.2m in 2015/16 and 2016/17.

5.11 Organisational Priorities Facilities ManagementCurrent Activity Action Current Position

Implementation of FMD elements of the SEP Review

Implementation of new and revised services into functions of the department. Phase 1 - Reduction on posts and new ways of working. Phase 2 - Reducing spend on buildings by reducing occupation.

Phase 1 - From the 2nd December 2013 the revised EFM structure was implemented and savings achieved. Recruitment processes continue to fill a small number of vacant posts. Phase 2 - Work is ongoing to achieve the savings by March 2015. EFM is on target to achieve the savings identified for 2013/2014 and a programme of works is in place to deliver the 2014/2015 savings.

Estate Strategy Corporate and BCU solutions discussed with PCC, direction of travel agreedBCU Strategy/opportunities being explored in more detailOCC preferred site being explored further

PCC and Chief Officers have approved the Estate Strategy direction. Huyton Magistrates Court building in the process of being purchased. Consultation with BCU commanders regarding estate requirements is due for completion end of March 2014. Consultation on opportunities to co-locate with partners ongoing. Options for all BCU’s to be completed April 2014. Site investigation for preferred OCC site completed with final report due mid February 2014.

Existing portolio work Maintenance/response service for FM issues in the existing estate. New Framework,is being tendered and will be in place for April 2014 for Reactive repairs service and Minor works and Projects. 2013/14 Projects and maintenance schemes near completion and 2014/15 programme being established.

5.12 Organisational PrioritiesComplaint Cases - Trend

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

2010/112011/122012/132013/14

5.13 Organisational PrioritiesComplaint Cases – Year to Date

Apr-Dec 2012 Apr-Dec 2013 Dif. % Dif.Wirral 83 74 -9 -10.8%Sefton 70 64 -6 -8.6%Knowsley 41 49 8 19.5%St Helens 34 35 1 2.9%Liverpool North 103 111 8 7.8%Liverpool South 56 56 0 0.0%OSU 27 31 4 14.8%Matrix 25 35 10 40.0%Custody & CJU 16 21 5 31.3%PSD 13 11 -2 -15.4%FCC 7 14 7 100.0%FCOU 7 10 3 42.9%Other 14 12 -2 -14.3%Force 496 523 27 5.4%

5.14 Organisational PrioritiesData Quality – Compliance with NCRS

Quarter 3

Force ALL Incidents closed correctly in line

with NSIR/NCRS?

Incidents recorded within

72 hours?

Incidents with correct crime

classifications?% Passed

Burglary 240 98% 95% 93% 94%

Criminal Damage 240 99% 94% 97% 97%

Robbery 156 92% 91% 88% 85%

Violence 240 95% 83% 87% 92%

TOMV TFMV 240 95% 80% 95% 92%

Domestic Violence 233 92% 97% 83% 90%

Hate Crimes 210 93% 93% 92% 90%

Au

dit

Sam

ple Compliance %

Force Crime and Incident Review

Crime Audit Team,

Strategic Development Department

Public Safety(Open)

6.1 Public SafetyRepeat Victimisation of Vulnerable Victims: December 2013

Short Term

Repeats All Victims Repeat RateHate Crime 28 149 18.8%

Domestic Abuse 76 405 18.8%

Sexual Offences 6 82 7.3%

6.2 Public SafetyRape Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Apr-Dec 13 27.2% vs Target 10.9 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 8.2 ppMSF Position 312 Month Trend Stable

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2012 KSI 2013 KSI 2013 Target

2012 KSI 55 40 41 47 48 43 56 48 50 38 57 41

2013 KSI 25 41 35 57 43 58 57 47 62 50 55 43

2013 Target 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6 39.6

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

6.3 Public SafetyRTC: KSIs

Jan-Dec 13 573vs Target 20.4% vs Jan-Dec 12 1.4%MSF Position 7 12 Month Trend Stable

6.4 Public SafetyMissing from Home / Unauthorised Absence

Medium Term

Missing from Home/Unauthorised Absence

The Sefton ‘Missing’ Pilot has been running since September. It incorporates the new ACPO approved two-tiered definition of Missing:

Missing - “Anyone whose whereabouts cannot be established and where the circumstances are out of character or the context suggests the person may be subject of crime or at risk of harm to themselves or another.”

Absent – “A person not at a place where they are expected or required to be.”

This new, two-tiered definition means that people are either Missing or Absent. There is no grey area. The current Force definition, which is still being used in the other 5 BCUs is:

Current definition-“A missing person is anyone whose whereabouts is unknown whatever the circumstances of disappearance. They will be recorded missing until located and their wellbeing or otherwise is established.”

Knowsley

•Police personnel commenced September at Huyton Police Station.

•Staff currently displaced for building work until 31.01.14.

•Interview held for MASH Inspector, starting 27th Jan.

•Go live date 17th Feb with partner agencies in place.

•Data sharing agreement,vetting, MOU and working practice arrangements are nearing finalisation but progressing well

St Helens

•Co-location achieved 17th Dec.

•Whole FCIU fully functional within CYPS premises.

•MASH procedures are being developed.

•MASH manager appointed (A/Director Pickett).

•Health to co-locate in March.

Liverpool

•Council have agreed to implement a MASH.

•Aiming for Jan 2015 implementation.

•Negotiations with regard to contracts with Careline (Liverpool Direct private supplier of front door for Childrens Services).

•Following Nigel Boulton’s report, a partnership workshop took place at the LACE Centre on 2nd Dec. Liverpool Children Services have identified a project lead. Next Governance Meeting due 21st Jan.

Wirral

•Information Sharing Agreement part signed off.

•Health Representative attached for trial period, possibly full time in future.

•DWP representative now attached 1 day per week.

•IT solution in development.

Sefton

•Sefton safeguarding MASH team to be co-located at St Peter's House with effect from Monday 10th February.

•All ongoing work will be completed within budget.

•ISA has been agreed and is out for signatures.

•Local Authority MASH manager is in place.

•Police team briefed and preparations for the move are underway.

•MASH meetings ongoing to develop processes, governance and performance management.

•Inspector in place to develop IOM and Sefton MASH.

6.5 Public SafetyMulti Agency Strategic Hubs (MASH)

Medium Term

6.6 Public SafetyDomestic Offence Crime Outcome Rate

Short Term

Vol. %Charges / Summons 1,916 86.0%Cautions / Warnings 252 11.3%

FPN 15 0.7%TIC 0 0.0%

Cannabis Warnings 0 0.0%Community Resolutions 45 2.0%Total Crime Outcomes 2,228 100.0%

Police Discretion 9

Apr - Dec 13

Apr-Dec 13 60.1% vs Target 0.8 ppvs Apr-Dec 12 1.4 ppMSF Position n/a12 Month Trend Stable