-
State
608 100.0 100.0 100.0IndianaValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
2002. How likely are you to vote in national elections?
443 72.8 72.8 72.8
116 19.0 19.0 91.8
50 8.2 8.2 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Definitely
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Party
207 34.0 34.0 34.0
237 39.0 39.0 73.0
164 27.0 27.0 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Democratic
Republican
Independent
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
1. President Obama has announced his intention to take executive
action that would allow about 5 million illegal immigrants to
liveand work legally in the United States. He plans to take this
action without authorization from Congress. Do you support or
opposethe president acting on his own to allow about 5 million
illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. and grant them work
authorization?
64 10.5 10.5 10.5
97 16.0 16.0 26.5
101 16.6 16.6 43.1
307 50.4 50.4 93.5
39 6.5 6.5 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Strongly support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Don't know
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana2/20/15
- 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set.
As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of
the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that
size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than
quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 1 2/22/2015
-
2. The House of Representatives recently passed a bill that
fully funds the Department of Homeland Security throughthe
remainder of this year, but prohibits the use of that money to
carry out the president's plan to shield millions of illegal
aliens from deportation and grant them work authorization. Do
you support or oppose passage of a bill that fully fundsthe
Department of Homeland Security but prohibits the use of those
funds to carry out the president's immigration plan?
223 36.6 36.6 36.6
129 21.1 21.1 57.8
94 15.5 15.5 73.3
95 15.6 15.6 88.9
67 11.1 11.1 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Strongly support
Somewhat support
Somewhat oppose
Strongly oppose
Don't know
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
3. Last year, Sen. Joe Donnelly opposed the president taking
executive action on immigration, saying 'the presidentshouldn't
make such significant policy changes on his own.' However, this
month Senator Donnelly voted against legislationthat would bar the
use of federal funds to implement the president's plan to shield
millions of illegal aliens from deportationand grant them work
authorization. Which of the following statements best reflects your
views on Sen. Donnelly's stance?
244 40.2 40.2 40.2
206 33.8 33.8 74.0
158 26.0 26.0 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Sen. Donnelly should supportlegislation to defund thepresident's
executive action onimmigration.Sen. Donnelly should
opposelegislation to defund thepresident's executive action
onimmigration.Don't know.
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
4. President Obama has said that if Congress sends him a
Department of Homeland Security bill thatprohibits him from using
funds to implement his executive action on immigration, he will
veto the bill. In
your opinion, would the president be justified in vetoing the
Homeland Security funding bill because it limitshis ability to
carry out his plan to shield illegal aliens from deportation and
grant them work authorization?
175 28.8 28.8 28.8
345 56.8 56.8 85.6
87 14.4 14.4 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Yes, the president would bejustified in vetoing the
HomelandSecurity funding bill.No, the president would not
bejustified in vetoing the HomelandSecurity funding bill.Don't
know.
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana2/20/15
- 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set.
As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of
the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that
size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than
quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 2 2/22/2015
-
5. If the House and Senate cannot come to an agreement on
legislation to fund the Department of Homeland Security,there is a
possibility that about 15 percent of the department's operations
could be shutdown. The other 85 percent ofDHS personnel are
considered essential workers and would remain on the job even if a
spending bill is not approved.
In your opinion, who would be most responsible if a partial
shutdown of DHS operations were to occur?
145 23.8 23.8 23.8
213 35.0 35.0 58.8
251 41.2 41.2 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
House Republicans who insiston including provisionspreventing
the president fromcarrying out his executive actionon
immigration.Senate Democrats andPresident Obama who insist
onallowing Homeland Securityfunds to be used to carry out
thepresident's executive action onimmigration.Both would be
equallyresponsible.Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
6. Supporters of the president's executive action on immigration
argue that it would make the country more secure because it
willhelp us identify the people who are currently living here
illegally. Opponents of the president's plan argue that it would
make thecountry less secure because it would divert resources and
manpower away from the department's primary mission of securingthe
homeland. In your opinion, what effect would the president's
executive action on immigration have on homeland security?
108 17.7 17.7 17.7
244 40.1 40.1 57.8
164 27.0 27.0 84.8
92 15.2 15.2 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
It would make the countrymore secure.It would make the
countryless secure.It would have little or noeffect on homeland
security.Don't know.
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Gender
304 50.0 50.0 50.0
304 50.0 50.0 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Male
Female
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana2/20/15
- 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set.
As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of
the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that
size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than
quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 3 2/22/2015
-
What is your current employment status?
335 55.2 55.7 55.7
35 5.7 5.7 61.5
25 4.2 4.2 65.7
20 3.2 3.3 69.0
62 10.3 10.4 79.4
124 20.4 20.6 100.0
602 99.0 100.0
6 1.0
608 100.0
Working (full or part time)
Temporarily unemployed andlooking for workTemporarily unemployed
and notlooking for workStudent
Stay at home parent/spouse
Retired
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Household Income
108 17.8 19.1 19.1
72 11.9 12.7 31.8
125 20.5 21.9 53.7
142 23.3 24.9 78.7
55 9.1 9.7 88.4
50 8.2 8.8 97.1
16 2.7 2.9 100.0
568 93.4 100.0
40 6.6
608 100.0
< $25K
$25-35K
$35-50K
$50-75K
$75-100K
$100-150K
$150K+
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana2/20/15
- 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set.
As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of
the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that
size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than
quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 4 2/22/2015
-
Age group A
121 20.0 20.0 20.0
225 36.9 37.0 57.0
176 29.0 29.0 86.0
85 14.0 14.0 100.0
607 99.8 100.0
1 .2
608 100.0
18-29
30-49
50-64
65+
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Age group B
44 7.3 7.3 7.3
132 21.7 21.7 29.0
217 35.7 35.8 64.8
177 29.1 29.1 94.0
37 6.0 6.0 100.0
607 99.8 100.0
1 .2
608 100.0
18-24
25-34
35-54
55-69
70+
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Generation
176 29.0 29.0 29.0
147 24.1 24.2 53.2
237 38.9 39.0 92.2
47 7.8 7.8 100.0
607 99.8 100.0
1 .2
608 100.0
First Globals
Nikes
Woodstockers
Privates
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana2/20/15
- 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set.
As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of
the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that
size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than
quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 5 2/22/2015
-
Education
271 44.6 44.8 44.8
334 55.0 55.2 100.0
606 99.6 100.0
2 .4
608 100.0
No College Degree
College Degree+
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Race
500 82.3 83.0 83.0
36 6.0 6.0 89.0
54 8.9 9.0 98.0
6 1.0 1.0 99.0
6 1.0 1.0 100.0
603 99.2 100.0
5 .8
608 100.0
White
Hisp
AfrAmer
Asian
Other
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Live
131 21.6 21.6 21.6
175 28.7 28.8 50.5
158 26.0 26.1 76.6
142 23.3 23.4 100.0
606 99.6 100.0
2 .4
608 100.0
Lge City
Sm City
Suburbs
Rural
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana2/20/15
- 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set.
As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of
the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that
size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than
quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 6 2/22/2015
-
Ideology Recoded
142 23.4 24.9 24.9
173 28.4 30.2 55.0
257 42.2 45.0 100.0
571 94.0 100.0
37 6.0
608 100.0
Liberal
Moderate
Conservative
Total
Valid
.00Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Religion
125 20.6 20.6 20.6
288 47.4 47.4 68.0
4 .7 .7 68.7
191 31.3 31.3 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Catholic
Protestant
Jewish
Other/None
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
BornAgain
172 28.2 59.6 59.6
116 19.1 40.4 100.0
288 47.4 100.0
320 52.6
608 100.0
Yes
No/NS
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Union member
77 12.7 12.7 12.7
531 87.3 87.3 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana2/20/15
- 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set.
As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of
the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that
size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than
quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 7 2/22/2015
-
Child under 17?
169 27.7 27.9 27.9
436 71.7 72.1 100.0
604 99.4 100.0
4 .6
608 100.0
Yes
No
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Residency
202 33.3 33.6 33.6
300 49.3 49.8 83.4
100 16.4 16.6 100.0
602 99.0 100.0
6 1.0
608 100.0
My city or town
America
The planet earth
Total
Valid
0Missing
Total
Frequency PercentValid
PercentCumulativePercent
Lost a job due to corporate downsizing within the past year?
56 9.1 9.1 9.1
552 90.9 90.9 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Been afraid of losing a job within the next year?
143 23.5 23.5 23.5
465 76.5 76.5 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana2/20/15
- 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set.
As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of
the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that
size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than
quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 8 2/22/2015
-
Worked at a job that pays less than an immediate previous
job?
195 32.1 32.1 32.1
413 67.9 67.9 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Gone without food for 24 hours in the past month due to a lack
of food or money?
29 4.8 4.8 4.8
579 95.2 95.2 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Veteran/Armed Forces?
108 17.8 17.8 17.8
500 82.2 82.2 100.0
608 100.0 100.0
Yes
No
Total
ValidFrequency Percent
ValidPercent
CumulativePercent
Zogby Analytics Online Survey of Likely Voters in Indiana2/20/15
- 2/21/15 MOE +/- 4.1 Percentage Points
Subsets have a larger margin of error than the whole data set.
As a rule we do not rely on the validity of very small subsets of
the data, especially sets smaller than 50-75 respondents. At that
size subset we can make generalizations,
but in these cases the data is more qualitative than
quantitativeZogby Analytics Page 9 2/22/2015
