41
PORT OF LONG BEACH

PORT OF LONG BEACH*millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) or 20-foot-long containers 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 1. SHANGHAI, CHINA 2. SINGAPORE 3. SHENZHEN, CHINA

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • PORT OF LONG BEACH

  • 4

    LEADING GATEWAY FOR U.S.-ASIA TRADE

  • STATE TIDELANDS TRUST

    PROMOTE TRADE, BUILD PORT

  • 6

  • WORLD’S 9TH BUSIEST PORT COMPLEX

    PORT OF LONG BEACHPORT OF LOS ANGELES

    *BASED ON 2017 CONTAINER CARGO VOLUMES

  • *millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) or 20-foot-long containers

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

    1. SHANGHAI, CHINA

    2. SINGAPORE

    3. SHENZHEN, CHINA

    4. NINGBO, CHINA

    5. HONG KONG

    9. POLB/POLA

    17. LOS ANGELES

    22. LONG BEACH

    2017 2016

    BUSIEST CONTAINER PORTS

    9

  • *millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) or 20-foot-long containers

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    1. LOS ANGELES

    2. LONG BEACH

    3. NEW YORK/NEW JERSEY

    4. SAVANNAH

    5. SEATTLE/TACOMA

    2017 2016

    BUSIEST U.S. CONTAINER PORTS

    10

  • 2006 2007

    2008

    2009

    20102011 2012

    2013

    2017

    20142015

    2016

    8.1 MILLION TEUs in 2018

    HIGHEST IN PORT HISTORY

  • CONTAINER TOTALS THROUGH 2018

    0.0

    1.0

    2.0

    3.0

    4.0

    5.0

    6.0

    7.0

    8.0

    9.0

    197

    1

    197

    3

    197

    5

    197

    7

    197

    9

    198

    1

    198

    3

    198

    5

    198

    7

    198

    9

    199

    1

    199

    3

    199

    5

    199

    7

    199

    9

    200

    1

    200

    3

    200

    5

    200

    7

    200

    9

    201

    1

    201

    3

    201

    5

    201

    7

    Empties Exports Imports

    *millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) or 20-foot-long containers

    12

  • TOP TRADING PARTNERSTOTAL EXPORTS, CONTAINERS AND NON-CONTAINERS COMBINED

    13

    CHINA, 5,999,401 , 33%

    JAPAN, 3,246,977 , 18%

    OTHER, 3,155,135 , 17%

    SOUTH KOREA, 1,551,065 , 9%

    TAIWAN, 905,258 , 5%

    INDONESIA, 826,766 , 5%MEXICO

    4%AUSTRALIA, 730,628 , 4%

    VIETNAM, 299,806 , 2%

    INDIA, 488,966 , 3%

    *BASED ON 2017 METRIC TONS

  • TOP TRADING PARTNERSTOTAL IMPORTS, CONTAINERS AND NON-CONTAINERS COMBINED

    14

    CHINA, 15,315,868 , 37%

    OTHER, 11,506,087 , 28%

    SAUDI ARABIA, 2,465,481 , 6%

    PANAMA, 1,976,289 , 5%

    SOUTH KOREA, 1,973,479 , 5%

    IRAQ, 1,813,046 , 4%JAPAN

    4% ECUADOR, 1,629,146 , 4%

    MEXICO, 1,511,840 , 4%

    ANGOLA, 1,158,617 , 3%

    *BASED ON 2017 METRIC TONS

  • CARGO FORECAST

    0.0

    2.0

    4.0

    6.0

    8.0

    10.0

    12.0

    14.0

    16.0

    18.0

    20.0

    19

    71

    19

    73

    19

    75

    19

    77

    19

    79

    19

    81

    19

    83

    19

    85

    19

    87

    19

    89

    19

    91

    19

    93

    19

    95

    19

    97

    19

    99

    20

    01

    20

    03

    20

    05

    20

    07

    20

    09

    20

    11

    20

    13

    20

    15

    20

    17

    20

    19

    20

    21

    20

    23

    20

    25

    20

    27

    20

    29

    20

    31

    20

    33

    20

    35

    20

    37

    20

    39

    *millions of twenty-foot equivalent units (teus) or 20-foot-long containers

    19901.5 M

    20188.1 M

    204018.5 M

  • 17

    CHICAGO

    LONG BEACH

    ATLANTA

    HOUSTON

    KANSAS CITY

    DALLAS

    MEMPHIS

    CONNECTEDACCESS TO MAJOR U.S. RAIL HUBS

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiAm_Lci7PPAhUK-mMKHS32BWAQjRwIBw&url=http://imagebase.net/Concept/World-Map-Dark&psig=AFQjCNEB7ahwcHIklnv31BFOrH7HSSOqag&ust=1475187435379055

  • •BNSF and UP service both POLB and POLA

    •Pacific Harbor Line handles on-dock rail operations within the Port, not the Class 1s

    •Alameda Corridor provides rail service to Ports

    Rail Operations

  • ON-DOCK RAIL TODAYVast Majority of Cargo Trucked Out of the Port

    19

    ON-DOCK24%

    TRUCKED76%

  • ON-DOCK RAIL TOMORROWClean Air Action Plan Calls for At Least One-Third Rail

    20

    ON-DOCK35%

    TRUCKED65%

  • $1 BILLIONInvestment in Rail Improvements

  • F o u r t h Tr a c k A t O c e a n

    T. I . W y e Tr a c k R e a l i g n m e n t

    D o u b l e Tr a c k A c c e s s F r o m P i e r G To J

    PIER B ON-DOCK RAILON TRACK

    FOR TOMORROW

  • • Maximize on-dock rail efficiency – More cargo on trains

    • Relieve rail line congestion with expansion of storage tracks –accommodate up to 10,000-foot trains

    • Reduce congestion on local streets and highways

    • Enhance utilities and modernize aging infrastructure

    • Improve motorist and rail safety by eliminating existing at-grade crossing at 9th Street and Pico Avenue

    Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility

    Project Objectives

  • Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility

  • Pier B

    No Project Alternative – Pier B On-Dock Support Facility

  • Locomotive Layover and Fueling Area

    Widen Bridge Over Dominguez Channel to Add

    One Additional Track

    Add 5 Arrival/Departure

    Tracks

    Add 31 Tracks

    Remove Shoemaker

    Ramps

    Close 9th

    Street Rail Crossing

    Realign Pico AvenuePier B

    12TH STREET ALTERNATIVE – PIER B ON-DOCK SUPPORT FACILITY

    Add 4 Tracks on Pico Ave.

    Realign and Widen Pier B Street

    Connects to Alameda

    Corridor

  • BUILD 5 NEW 10,000 FT ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE TRACKS

    SERVE UP TO 17 TRAINS PER DAY

  • EXPAND RAIL YARD

    4X STORAGE CAPACITY

  • CONSTRUCT 1 YARD LEAD ON EAST END

    CONSTRUCT 2 YARD LEADS ON WEST END

    STREAMLINE ON-DOCK RAIL FLOW

  • CONSTRUCT NEW LOCOMOTIVE LAYOVER FACILITY

    RESUPPLY 24 LOCOMOTIVES

    ALLEVIATE NETWORK CONGESTION

  • IMPROVE AT-GRADE CROSSING SAFETY

    IMPROVE PIER B ST. &PICO AVE.

    CLOSE AT-GRADE CROSSINGS

    IMPROVE ROADWAYSAFETY AND CAPACITY

  • Higher ACTA Revenuedue to rail growth

    Mode ShiftFrom Truck to Rail

    Reduced ShippingCost

    Improved Competitiveness

    Lower Emissions

    PROGRAM BENEFITS

  • $870MRISK BASED CONTINGENCYESCALATIONPROPERTY ACQUISITIONOIL FIELD RELOCATIONUTILITY RELOCATION

    9TH ST AT-GRADE CROSSING CLOSUREEARLY RAIL IMPROVEMENTSPIER B ST FREIGHT CORRIDOR RECONSTRUCTIONRAIL YARD EXPANSION

    BASELINE PROGRAM

    BUDGET

  • $870 MILLION PIER B BUDGET ($millions)

    35

    RIGHT OF WAY, UTILITIES, $567

    PHASE 1, $42

    PHASE 2, $112

    PHASE 3, $109 PLANNING, $35

  • • NEPA/CEQA environmental review

    • Tidelands Trust obligations

    • Eminent domain/acquisition issues

    • Rail agreements

    • Funding options and associated regulatory requirements

    Regulatory/Legal Hurdles

  • 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 20242018

    PROGRAM BASELINE SCHEDULE

    Advertise to Award Engineering Contract

    JULY JUNE

    30% Des i gn Deve l opmen t

    JULY MAR

    DEC

    9th Street At-Grade Crossing Closure

    Detai led Design & Right of Way

    MAR JUN

    $40M

    $70M

    $170M

    $270M

    $370M

    R a i l P h a s e 1

    MAR JUN

  • S t r e e t a n d U t i l i t y C o n s t r u c t i o n

    NOV AUG

    PROGRAM BASELINE SCHEDULE

    2024 2025 2026 2028 2029 20302027 2031 2032

    NOV MAR

    Rail Phase 2 Construction

    JUNMAR

    Rail Phase 3 Construction

    $370M

    $470M

    $570M

    $670M

    $770M

    $870M $870M

  • FREQUENT UPDATES

    FINANCIAL PLAN

    SEQUENCED DELIVERY

    14 YEARSTARGET: $870M

    AND BENEFITS

    AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH

  • STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH

    • UPDATE PUBLIC ON PIER B STATUS

    • PERIODIC COMMUNITY MEETINGS

    • TARGETED E-NEWSLETTER

    • WEBSITE AND SOCIAL MEDIA

  • Questions?