PORT STATE CONTROL

FOCUS ON CREW COMPETENCE

ELVICTOR GROUP1ST DIGITAL

CREW MANAGEMENT FORUM

BV ©

2

- INTRODUCTION

- PLAYERS

- ONBOARD INSPECTIONS

- THE PORT STATE CONTROL

- CREW COMPETENCE

- PERFORMANCE MONITORING

- ANNUAL REPORTS PUBLICATION

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

4

Port State Control (PSC) is a system of harmonized inspection procedures designed to target sub-standard ships, with objection being their elimination. PSC carries out inspection of foreign ships in national ports to verify that the condition of the ship and its equipment comply with the requirements of international regulations and that the ship is manned and operated in compliance with these rules.

Many of IMO's most important technical conventions contain provisions for ships to be inspected when they visit foreign ports to ensure that they meet IMO requirements.

16 March 1978

AMOCO CADIZ

5

Port State Control (PSC) inspections were originally intended to be a back up to Flag State implementation, but experience especially if organized on a regional basis.Responsibility for monitoring the compliance of ships with the international standards for safety, pollution prevention and onboard living and working conditions lies primarily with the Flag State. The Flag State may utilize the services of an RO (Recognized Organization).

6

Responsibility for maintenance of condition of the ship and its equipment and its trained certificated and medical fit crew after surveys, to comply with the requirements of Conventions applicable to the ship lies with the ship’s company.

Relying on Recognized Organizations, the flag state normally guarantees the completeness and efficiency of the inspection and surveys for issuance of relevant certificates.

7

1.7.5 Inspection: A visit on board a ship to check both the validity of the relevant certificates and other documents, and the overall condition of the ship, its equipment and its crew.

Resolution A.1052(27)PROCEDURES FOR PORT STATE CONTROL, 2011

“[…] Some flag States fail to fulfil their commitments containedin agreed international legal instruments and subsequently someships are sailing in an unsafe condition, threatening the lives aswell as the marine environment. Port State control is a systemof harmonized inspection procedures designed to target sub-standards ships with the main objective being their eventualelimination..”

Mediterranean MoU (www.medmou.org/)

8

Background for introducing PSC inspections and introducing MoU areas: Unreliability of surveys carried out by Flag state or

ROs. Introduced as a back-up or “2nd line of defense” for

port and national waters safety and protection of the environment .

Direct Port State control over visiting foreign ships Avoid unfair competition between the ports in a

certain area. Set common goals in terms of number of vessel

inspected. Establishing common criteria for control of ships

PSC Goals, :Mitigate risks posed by substandard ships and ships found not complying with international conventions/ regulations/ requirements.

Herald of Free Enterprise” 1987

9

10

IMO has encouraged the establishment of regional port State control organizations. IMO resolution A. 1052 (27) covering PSC activities on the SOLAS, MARPOL, STCW and ITC69 Conventions and ILO Convention has been adopted on 30 November 2011.As of today following agreements on port State control-Memorandum of Understanding or MOUs -have been signed covering all of the world's oceans:

1. Europe and the North Atlantic (Paris MOU) - 19822. Acuerdo de Viña del Mar (Latin America MOU) - 19923. Asia and the Pacific (Tokyo MOU) - 1993-944. Caribbean (Caribbean MOU) - 19965. The Mediterranean (Mediterranean MOU) - 19976. The Indian Ocean (Indian Ocean MOU) - 1998-997. West and Central Africa (Abuja MOU) - 19998. The Black Sea region (Black Sea MOU) - 20009. The Arab States of the Gulf (Riyadh MoU (GCC MoU) - 200510. United States of America (USCG) – National PSC Regime

P L A Y E R S

12

PLAYERS ANALYSIS OF THE MARITIME INSPECTION REGIMESS.KNAPP & P.H.FRANSESECONOMETRIC INSTITUTE / ERASMUS UNIVERSITY

13

WHOSE REQUIREMENTS DOES ANY “RECRUITMENT & PLACEMENT SERVICE” HAVE TO SATISFY ?

►SEAFARER(S)

►CLIENT/COMPANY

►P.S.C. INSPECTIONS

► FLAG ADMINISTRATION

► INSURERS (ALSO THRU’ CO.)

►RIGHTSHIP (ALSO THRU’ CO.)

►VETTING INSPECTIONS(ALSO THRU’ CO.)

►PORT AUTHORITIES RULES

►MLC 2006 (REG. 1.1-1.2-1.3-1.4- 5.1.5)

►STCW & ISM (CH.6)

►MLC 2006 ( REG. 2.1-2.2-2.3-2.7)

►MLC 2006 (REG.4.1+4.3)

►SPECIFIC FLAG CIRCULARS

► 3rd PARTY REQUIREMENTS

ONBOARD INSPECTIONS

15

ONBOARD INSPECTIONS ANALYSIS OF THE MARITIME INSPECTION REGIMESS.KNAPP & P.H.FRANSESECONOMETRIC INSTITUTE / ERASMUS UNIVERSITY

16

Legal BackgroundThe right to inspect ships by PSC is based on the following codesand conventions :

•SOLAS 74 (Safety of Life at Sea) Int. Convention•MARPOL 73/78 (Prevention of Pollution from Ships)•International Load Line Convention 1966•STCW (Standards of Training Cert. and Watchkeeping of Seafarers) Int. Convention 78/95•International Tonnage Convention 1969.•Collision Prevention Regulation 1972 (COLREG 72).•ILO Convention n° 147 (Merchant Shipping Min. Standards)•ILO Maritime Labour Convention 2006 - from 20/08/2013•The International Convention on Civil Liability for •Oil Pollution Damage, 1992, (CLC 92)•The International Safety Management (ISM) Code•The International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code •AFS Convention•BWM Convention•The International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001 The implementation on board of these conventions is checked by PSC for compliance during inspections.

PORT STATE CONTROLThe System Targeting Substandard Ships

17

WHAT IS INSPECTED ? ANALYSIS OF MARITIME INSPECTIONS REGIMEBY S.KNAPP & P.H.FRANSESECONOMETRIC INSTITUTE/ERASMUS UNIVERSITY

18

19

20

21

THE PORT STATE CONTROL

23

PSC TARGETING VESSELS

24

PSC CRITERIA FOR INSPECTION SELECTION

25

TYPE OF SELECTED INSPECTION

26

MANAGEMENT OF ISSUED DEFICIENCIES

27

ACTUAL “DIFFICULT” CASES

► 3 x ABs 3 x Oss

►Electrician (ETO III/6)

►UMS ships

► 3 x Oilers

SAFETY WATCHES, SECURITY WATCHES MAINTENANCE + OTHER DUTIES

► 2 x ABs + 1 x Bosun2 x OSs + 1 x D.Cadet

►Electrician (ETR III/7)

►Ships with full watches

► 2 x Oilers + 1 x 4/E

MUST BE COVERED (MLC 2006 & REST HOURS & ISM etc. )

CREW COMPETENCE

29

HOW TO PROVE COMPETENCE ?

► CREW CERTIFICATES (OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS REQUIRED UNDER S.T.C.W.)

► CREW CERTIFICATES ENDORSEMENTS

► COMPETENCES (LEVEL OF RESPONSIBILITY & AREA-TONNAGE-PROPULSION POWER LIMITATIONS)

► CERTIFICATES OF PROFICIENCIES

► ANSCILLARY CERTIFICATES( RADAR , ARPA , GMDSS)

► ATTESTATION / DOCUMENTARY PROOF OF ANY REQUIREMENT(S) OF CONVENTION(S)

► SHIP TYPE COMPETENCE

► OPERATION OF EQUIPMENT COMPETENCE

► ADEQUATE ASHORE & ONBOARD TRAINING

► ASHORE & ONBOARD FAMILIARISATIONS

► STANDARD OF COMPETENCE IN A SPECIFIC DUTY

► REFRESHER COURSES (AS/IF REQUIRED)

► MEDICAL FITNESS ( & AGE ?)

► REVALIDATIONS (AS/IF REQUIRED /5Y)

► PROMOTION COMPETENCE

► ALCOHOL & DRUG ISSUES

30

FUNCTIONS’ & CAPACITIES’ RESPONSIBILITIES – LIMITATIONS

31

32

DEPARTMENT HEADS

33

OFFICERS

34

RATINGS (WATCHKEEPING)

35

SEAFARERS WITH VARIOUS DESIGNATED DUTIES

36

SEAFARERS WITH VARIOUS DESIGNATED DUTIES (CONT’)

37

SECURITY DUTIES

38

SHIP TYPE (SPECIAL TYPES OF SHIP)

39

SHIP TYPE (PASSENGER SHIP)

40

ITF CONTRIBUTION

PERFORMANCE MONITORING

42

SHIP RISK Profile – P. MoU & T. MoU

43

Company Performance

DATA from Annual Reports of :

PARIS MoU (2016 & KPIs 2017)TOKYO MoU (2016), AMSA (2016)USCG (2016), Indian MoU (2016)

Vina Del Mar (2016)Abuja MoU (2016)

FAIRPLAYBV ©

45

PSC Detention data by major MOUs 2017 - YTD

ClassTotal YTD 2017Det CR Total

ABS 21 1 22BV 58 9 67CCS 2 0 2CRS 4 0 4DNV 3 0 3DNVGL 53 8 61GL 17 1 18IRS 3 0 3KR 7 0 7LR 21 4 25NKK 65 3 68PRS 9 0 9RINA 24 2 26RS 48 2 50Other 195 48 243

ClassTotal YTD 2017Det CR Total

ABS 44 1 45BV 79 2 81CCS 11 0 11CRS 2 0 2DNV 3 0 3DNVGL 52 3 55GL 9 0 9IRS 13 2 15KR 40 2 42LR 45 5 50NKK 224 26 250PRS 6 0 6RINA 0 0 0RS 9 0 9Other 294 53 347

ClassTotal YTD 2017Det CR Total

ABS 25 0 25BV 10 1 11CCS 6 0 6CRS 2 0 2DNV 0 0 0

DNVGL 28 0 28

GL 2 0 2IRS 6 0 6KR 8 0 8LR 26 0 26NKK 77 0 77PRS 5 0 5RINA 1 0 1RS 0 0 0Other 42 0 42

ClassTotal YTD 2017Det CR Total

ABS 6 0 6BV 9 0 9CCS 1 0 1CRS 0 0 0DNV 0 0 0

DNVGL 4 0 4

GL 0 0 0IRS 1 0 1KR 4 0 4LR 5 1 6NKK 14 0 14PRS 0 0 0RINA 0 0 0RS 0 0 0Other 9 2 11

USCGIND MOUTMOUPMOU

46

TOKYO MOU

47

PSC Detention data

2017 – Paris MoU Deficiencies

48

PSC Detention data – FLAGS BLACK LIST P.MoU

49

PSC Detention data

AMSA 2016

50

THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION