Upload
kitra-trujillo
View
41
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Positron Source for ILC TeV Upgrade. Wanming Liu Posipol 2012. Constrains. End of linac , => Drive beam energy =~500GeV Has to be compatible with the TDR site layout No change to be made on the target station and there after. Challenges. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Positron Source for ILC TeV Upgrade
Wanming LiuPosipol 2012
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Constrains
End of linac, => Drive beam energy =~500GeV Has to be compatible with the TDR site layout
– No change to be made on the target station and there after
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Challenges Radiated Photo parameters from beam passing through a helical undulator:
1
222'2
2
220
26
))(][)((4
10]
1[ xJ
x
n
KxJ
K
hc
e
MeVmdE
dNphn
nn
functionsBesselJ
KKx
KK
n
n
n
n
)1(2
0]1)1(
[
21
22
12
1
)1(
4
][*][*934.0
2
2
11
K
K
cE
cmTBK
u
u
The 1st Harmonic critical energy is proportional g2
dq is inverse to g
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Goals and Assumptions
Goal– A reasonable scheme for the 1 TeV option without
major impact on the ILC TDR configuration. Assumptions
– Drive beam energy: 500 GeV– Target: 0.4 X0 Ti– Drift from end of undulator to target: 400m– OMD: QWT and FC
Photon number spectrum for K=1 and different undulator period
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0 50 100 150 200photon energy (MeV)
dNph
/dE
lu=1cmlu=2cmlu=4cmlu=8cm
lu( cm)
Nph/m E average (MeV)
Total photon energy per meter (MeV)
1 2.60323 139.381398
362.841814
2 1.301615 69.690699 90.710454
3 0.867743 46.460466 40.315757
4 0.650807 34.84535 22.677613
5 0.520646 27.87628 14.513673
6 0.433872 23.230233 10.078939
7 0.37189 19.911628 7.404935
8 0.325404 17.422675 5.669403
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
With Fixed K=1 and different undulator period length
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0 2 4 6 8 10l u (cm)
Pos
itron
yie
ld
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Pol
ariz
atio
n
YieldPolarization
Based on the above plot, lu=4.3cm is used for a more detail simulation to evaluate the energy deposition and impact on drive beam
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Photon beam power and energy deposition for generating 3e10 captured positrons
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
3 4 5 6 7 8l u (cm)
Ene
rgy
Dep
osi
ton
(kW
)
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
Ph
oto
n be
am p
ow
er (
kW)
Energy DepositionPhoton beam power
Parameters for 1.5 of positron yield using fixed K=1 with different undulator periodlu (cm) Photon beam
power (kW)Power deposition (kW)
Drive beam energy lost (GeV)
Undulator length required (m)
3 206 7.19 4.91 124
4 186 7.84 4.44 198
4.3 181 7.94 4.3 221
5 176 8.37 4.19 289
6 166 8.76 3.88 387
7 170 9.80 4.05 549
8 166 10.34 3.94 697
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Using FC as OMD When FC is used as OMD instead of QWT, the yield increased
up to about 2.62 for 231m long undulator with K=1 and lu=4.3m and thus the undulator length is reduced to 132m
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
The impact on 500GeV drive beam from the chosen undulator parameters
Code used: elegant Lattice:
– Quads:Effective length 1mStrenth:0.09717 and -0.1109 alternating.Separation: 12m with space of quad excluded.
– Undulator:lu=4.3cm, K=1 Sections with effective length of ~11.0m between quads
Initial beam parameters:enx=10e-6 m.rad, eny=0.04e-6 m.radbx=46m, by=9mEnergy spread: 1GeV or 0.2% Average energy: 500GeV
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Drive beam emittance
With no quad-bpm error included, the beam emittance is damping.
9.88E-06
9.90E-06
9.92E-06
9.94E-06
9.96E-06
9.98E-06
1.00E-05
1.00E-05
1.00E-05
0 100 200 300 400s (m)
e x (
m.r
ad)
3.95E-08
3.96E-08
3.97E-08
3.98E-08
3.99E-08
4.00E-08
4.01E-08
e y (
m.r
ad)
normalizedemittance x
Normalizedemittance y
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Size of beam as it passing through the lattice
0.0E+00
5.0E-06
1.0E-05
1.5E-05
2.0E-05
2.5E-05
0 100 200 300 400s (m)
s x (
m)
0.0E+00
2.0E-07
4.0E-07
6.0E-07
8.0E-07
1.0E-06
1.2E-06
1.4E-06
s y (
m)
sigma_xsigma_y
The beam is well matched to the lattice
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Beta of beam
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 100 200 300 400s (m)
Bet
a o
f bea
m
beta_xbeta_y
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Drive beam energy and energy spread
0.195
0.2
0.205
0.21
0.215
0.22
0.225
0.23
0.00E+00 1.00E+02 2.00E+02 3.00E+02 4.00E+02s (m)
En
erg
y S
pre
ad
(%)
493.00
494.00
495.00
496.00
497.00
498.00
499.00
500.00
501.00
Be
am
Ene
rgy
(Ge
V)
Energy spread Beam Energy
Drive beam energy spread increased from about 0.2% up to about 0.23% with about 400m long undulator beam line.
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Preliminary results about polarization
K=1, lu=3cm K=1.5, lu=4cm
30% polarization can be achieved by using a photon collimator with iris of about 0.9mm with K=1 and lu=3cm or about 1.1 with K=1.5 and lu=4cm
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Preliminary results about polarization-Fixed K=1.5, different length of period
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14radius of collimator iris (cm)
Yie
ld
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
Pol
.
Yield, lu=5cmYield, lu=6cmYield, lu=7cmPol., lu=5cmPol., lu=6cmPol.,lu=7cm
Results are showing that the polarization doesn’t change much with the undulator period length. The criteria for choosing undulator period length will be depends on other parameters like energy deposition and the impact on the drive beam.
Posipol 2012, 09/04/2012 - 09/07/2012, DESY Zeuthen
Summary
To upgrade to TeV ILC, the ILC undulator based positron source can be upgraded to take the ~500GeV drive beam by using an undulator having K=1 with lu=4.3m period without changing other part of positron source. There is no technical difficulty to build a longer period undulator with K=1.
To upgrade to TeV ILC with polarized positron source (>50% polarization), more studies and optimizations are needed.