1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 2θ (degrees) Intensity Introduction The microstructure analysis of thermoelectric oxides like Ca 3 Co 4 O 9 is fundamental to the research of thermoelectric power generation devices. These devices provide a means of utilizing waste heat to make power; thus, improving the sustainability of energy. Analysis techniques for studying the p-type semiconductor Ca 3 Co 4 O 9 were explored in this study. Also, β-FeO(OH) was investigated which is useful in magnetic recording media. Experiment Synthesis of Iron Powder: FeCl 3 + Urea + H 2 O •Solution placed in high preactor •Particles centrifuged after removed from preactor Determination of appropriate XRD and SEM parameters for analysis: •Adjust XRD scan speed, lens size, and angle increment •Adjust SEM preparation method, voltage applied, detector mode, and working distance 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 2θ (degrees) Intensity Objective Determine appropriate XRD settings to get well-defined peaks for Ca 3 Co 4 O 9 pellet sample and β-FeO(OH) powder sample. Determine appropriate SEM settings to get clear SEM images for β-FeO(OH). Scan Angles: 5°- 62° Increment: 0.05 Scan Speed: 16 sec/step Mode: 1D Absorber: 1 Scan Angles: 5°-80° Increment: 0.05° Scan Speed: 8 sec/step Mode: 0D Absorber: 1 Scan Angles: 5°- 80° Increment: 0.05° Scan Speed: 38 sec/step Mode: 1D Absorber: 1 Lens: 0.2 mm SEM Images for β-FeO(OH) Preparation: particles dispersed on double sided copper tape attached to sample mount Preparation: particles mounted on silicon wafer and coated with platinum XRD Results for β-FeO(OH) Scan Angles: 10°-80° Increment: 0.05° Scan Speed: 13 sec/step Mode: 1D Absorber: 1 Lens: 0.1 mm 10µm Conclusions 1 µm XRD Ca 3 Co 4 O 9 pellets require a scanspeed of 16 sec/step for distinguishable peaks β-FeO(OH) powder requires a scanspeed of 38 sec/step Powders require a higher scan speed than pellets A larger lens size produces higher peaks SEM β-FeO(OH) powder must be attached to a silicon wafer and coated with a conductive coating to get clear images β-FeO(OH) particles were roughly 500 nm with a narrow particle size distribution and a needle-like shape XRD Results for Ca 3 Co 4 O 9 References [1] Michitaka OHTAKI, Recent aspects of oxide thermoelectric materials for power generation from mid-to-high temperature heat source, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 119 (11), 770-775. [2] Jeffrey W. Fergus, Oxide materials for high temperature thermoelectric energy conversion, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 32 (2012) 525-540. [3] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010938X03000787 [4] http://www.easyfairs.com/de/events_216/labotec- suisse2012_24924/labotec-suisse-2012_24925/visitors_24926/ ausstellerkatalog_24937/stand/337587/ [5] [1] [4] Acknowledgements I want to thank Xueyan Song and Maria Alejandra Torres Arango for their assistance as well as the WVU Shared Facilities for their assistance and access to the XRD and SEM. This research was sponsored by NSF Divisions of Materials Research and Chemistry (DMR-1004431). 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 2θ (degrees) Intensity (00 2) (003) (004) (005) (006) (001) (202) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2θ (degrees) Intensity (110) (200) (31 0) (211) (521) (411) (420) SEM Hydrothermal Reactor Thermoelectric Unicouple Ca 3 Co 4 O 9 crystal structure β-FeO(OH) crystal structure XRD [2] [3] [5] [6] Laura E. Carpenter, Xueyan Song, and Maria Alejandra Torres Arango Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506- 6045 Microstructure Analysis of Ca 3 Co 4 O 9 and β-FeO(OH) using XRD and SEM

POSTER-1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: POSTER-1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2θ (degrees)

Inte

nsity

IntroductionThe microstructure analysis of thermoelectric oxides like Ca3Co4O9 is fundamental to the research of thermoelectric power generation devices. These devices provide a means of utilizing waste heat to make power; thus, improving the sustainability of energy. Analysis techniques for studying the p-type semiconductor Ca3Co4O9 were explored in this study. Also, β-FeO(OH) was investigated which is useful in magnetic recording media.

Experiment

Synthesis of Iron Powder: • FeCl3 + Urea + H2O • Solution placed in high preactor• Particles centrifuged after

removed from preactor

Determination of appropriate XRD and SEM parameters for analysis:• Adjust XRD scan speed, lens size, and

angle increment• Adjust SEM preparation method,

voltage applied, detector mode, and working distance

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2θ (degrees)

Inte

nsity

ObjectiveDetermine appropriate XRD settings to get well-defined peaks for Ca3Co4O9 pellet sample and β-FeO(OH) powder sample. Determine appropriate SEM settings to get clear SEM images for β-FeO(OH).

Scan Angles: 5°-62°Increment: 0.05Scan Speed: 16 sec/stepMode: 1DAbsorber: 1

Scan Angles: 5°-80° Increment: 0.05°Scan Speed: 8 sec/stepMode: 0DAbsorber: 1

Scan Angles: 5°-80° Increment: 0.05°Scan Speed: 38 sec/stepMode: 1DAbsorber: 1Lens: 0.2 mm

SEM Images for β-FeO(OH)

Preparation: particles dispersed on double sided copper tape attached to sample mount

Preparation: particles mounted on silicon wafer and coated with platinum

XRD Results for β-FeO(OH)

Scan Angles: 10°-80° Increment: 0.05°Scan Speed: 13 sec/stepMode: 1DAbsorber: 1Lens: 0.1 mm

10µm

Conclusions

1 µm

XRD • Ca3Co4O9 pellets require a scanspeed of 16 sec/step for distinguishable peaks• β-FeO(OH) powder requires a scanspeed of 38 sec/step • Powders require a higher scan speed than pellets• A larger lens size produces higher peaksSEM• β-FeO(OH) powder must be attached to a silicon wafer and coated with a conductive

coating to get clear images• β-FeO(OH) particles were roughly 500 nm with a narrow particle size distribution and

a needle-like shape

XRD Results for Ca3Co4O9

References[1] Michitaka OHTAKI, Recent aspects of oxide thermoelectric materials for power generation from mid-to-high temperature heat source, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 119 (11), 770-775.[2] Jeffrey W. Fergus, Oxide materials for high temperature thermoelectric energy conversion, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 32 (2012) 525-540.[3] http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010938X03000787[4] http://www.easyfairs.com/de/events_216/labotec-suisse2012_24924/labotec-suisse-2012_24925/visitors_24926/ausstellerkatalog_24937/stand/337587/[5] http://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/geochemsheets/techniques/XRD.html[6] http://www.nanocenter.umd.edu/new_facilities/NispLab.php

[1]

[4]

Acknowledgements• I want to thank Xueyan Song and Maria Alejandra Torres Arango for their assistance as

well as the WVU Shared Facilities for their assistance and access to the XRD and SEM.• This research was sponsored by NSF Divisions of Materials Research and Chemistry

(DMR-1004431).

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2θ (degrees)

Inte

nsity

(002

)

(003

) (004

)

(005

)

(006

)

(001

)

(202

)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 800

200400600800

10001200140016001800

2θ (degrees)

Inte

nsity

(110

)

(200

)

(310

)

(211

)

(521

)

(411

)

(420

)

SEMHydrothermal Reactor

Thermoelectric Unicouple Ca3Co4O9 crystal structure β-FeO(OH) crystal structure

XRD

[2] [3]

[5] [6]

Laura E. Carpenter, Xueyan Song, and Maria Alejandra Torres ArangoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506-6045

Microstructure Analysis of Ca3Co4O9 and β-FeO(OH) using XRD and SEM