1
She failed initial decatheterization and developed fever. Empiric Ciprooxacin was started for suspected UTI. She continued to have low grade fever. Urine culture revealed Klebsiella pneumoniae sensitive only to Colistin (minimal inhibitory concentration of 0.5). Infectious disease consultation was requested. Blood cultures were negative and repeat urine studies were collected. She was started on Colistin and serial urine cultures reported decreasing organism burden with the last negative for infection. Center for Disease Control (CDC) analysis of urine culture conrmed NDM beta-lac- tamase-mediated resistance. Discussion: Multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms are an increasing concern in hospitals and post-acute care facilities due to high associated morbidity and mortality. New Delhi Metallo-B- lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM-1) is a relatively new pathogen. The rst incident in the United States occurred in Colorado in 2012. The rst world report occurred in Sweden in 2009. This is rst reported NDM-1 producing Klebsiella pneumoniae UTI in AIR setting. Conclusions: The CDC, acute care hospitals, and Long-Term Acute Care are developing isolation regulations to help prevent spread of these new MDR organisms. AIR facilities share the risk for encountering new MDR organisms and should have an active role in collaborating to identify and prevent spread of these organisms. Poster 119 Four Extremity Gangrene Leading to Amputation Presents a Challenging Rehabilitation Course: A Case Report. Andrew J. Chrisman, MD (William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, United States); Sherry Viola, MD; Nikhil Shetty, MD; Mathew P. Jones, MD. Disclosures: A. J. Chrisman, No Disclosures: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships to Disclose. Case Description: A 53-year-old Caucasian woman developed septic shock secondary to nephrolithiasis. She underwent emergent cystoscopy with stent placement. Postoperatively she required multiple vasopressors and intubation. Her hospital course was further complicated by a myocardial infarction as well as dry gangrene of her bilateral hands and feet. Setting: Tertiary Care Hospital. Results or Clinical Course: The patient was originally admitted to the Inpatient Rehabilitation Service prior to any surgical inter- vention. She required maximal assistance of 2 people for transfers. She was discharged to the surgical service twice; rst for an upper extremity amputation of the left second through fth digits and later for a right below the knee amputation (BKA). Her rehabilita- tion goals included wound care, increasing strength and endurance, and maximizing functional use of her residual limbs in preparation for future surgery. Discussion: From the time of the initial consult this patient was particularly challenging. In order to preserve as much functional tissue as possible, the treating surgeons recom- mended performing multiple amputations spread over several months with continuation of intensive therapy and whirlpool debridement between operations. Several discussions with her insurance company were necessary to educate them of the benet of proceeding in this manner. Had all of her surgeries been performed at once, her thumb would not have been spared and her BKA would likely have been an above the knee amputation. The anticipation of being discharged with ampu- tations in all four extremities led to an emotional burden that manifested as severe anxiety, making pain control difcult. It was not until discharge planning was complete that adequate pain control was achieved. Conclusions: In this case the Physical Medicine and Rehabilita- tion team functioned as patient advocate, pain management specialist, counselor and care management coordinator. The importance of communication in this case cannot be over- emphasized as her successful rehabilitation will continue to require teamwork among multiple medical specialists, surgical specialists, therapists and prosthetists as well as the continued nancial support of her insurance company. Poster 120 Modied Berg Balance Scale for Use in Fall Prediction Among Patients with Lumbar Spine Precautions. Argy Stampas, MD (The Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, White Plains, NY, United States); Libi Galmer, DO; Alexander J. Martinez, MD; Elizabeth A. Dominick, DPT, MS, NCS; Michael V. Gramuglia, DO; Jessica F. Elder, MPH, PhD. Disclosures: A. Stampas, No Disclosures: I Have No Relevant Financial Relationships to Disclose. Objective: To test the hypothesis that a modied version of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) can be used to discriminate fall risk among patients with lumbar spine precautions. The BBS was modied (BBSm) to eliminate two items, retrieving object from oorand turning to look behind, as these movements are contraindicated in this patient population. This modied scale ranges from 0-48 with higher scores indicating greater balance, strength and mobility. Design: Prospective, observational study Setting: Rehabilitation Hospital in White Plains, NY Participants: 50 consecutive, ambulatory patients with lumbar spine precautions, admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Interventions: N/A Main Outcome Measures: Fall incidence from time of admission to 6 months. Results or Clinical Course: Among 50 participants, 18 (36%) fell and 32 (64%) did not. While non-fallers had higher discharge BBSm scores, no statistically signicant difference was found between non-fallers (32.7 [SD, 10.3]) and fallers (27.4 [SD, 13.3]) using a Wilcoxon two-sample test (p¼0.23). Using logistic regression the BBSm yielded non-signicant results for prediction of fall risk. An AUC of 0.61 generated from a Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve further suggests a lack of discriminative ability of BBSm between fallers and non-fallers. Those who fell however, tended to be younger (64.7 [SD, 14.4] vs. 72.3 [SD, 11.1]) and were more likely to use assistive devices (OR 6.2, (95% CI [1.2, 31.7]). Conclusions: While the BBS has been shown to be a valid measurement to assess fall risk in the elderly and in stroke patients, even after modifying the scale to facilitate its use among patients with lumbar spine precautions, no evidence was found to support its use in discriminating fall risk in this population. Further research is needed to understand what factors exist for prediction of falls in this population. PM&R Vol. 6, Iss. 9S, 2014 S225

Poster 120 Modified Berg Balance Scale for Use in Fall Prediction Among Patients with Lumbar Spine Precautions

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PM&R Vol. 6, Iss. 9S, 2014 S225

She failed initial decatheterization and developed fever. EmpiricCiprofloxacin was started for suspected UTI. She continued to havelow grade fever. Urine culture revealed Klebsiella pneumoniaesensitive only to Colistin (minimal inhibitory concentration of 0.5).Infectious disease consultation was requested. Blood cultures werenegative and repeat urine studies were collected. She was started onColistin and serial urine cultures reported decreasing organismburden with the last negative for infection. Center for DiseaseControl (CDC) analysis of urine culture confirmed NDM beta-lac-tamase-mediated resistance.Discussion: Multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms are anincreasing concern in hospitals and post-acute care facilities due tohigh associated morbidity and mortality. New Delhi Metallo-B-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM-1) is a relativelynew pathogen. The first incident in the United States occurred inColorado in 2012. The first world report occurred in Sweden in2009. This is first reported NDM-1 producing Klebsiella pneumoniaeUTI in AIR setting.Conclusions: The CDC, acute care hospitals, and Long-TermAcute Care are developing isolation regulations to help preventspread of these new MDR organisms. AIR facilities share the riskfor encountering new MDR organisms and should have an activerole in collaborating to identify and prevent spread of theseorganisms.

Poster 119Four Extremity Gangrene Leading to AmputationPresents a Challenging Rehabilitation Course:A Case Report.Andrew J. Chrisman, MD (William Beaumont Hospital,Royal Oak, MI, United States); Sherry Viola, MD;Nikhil Shetty, MD; Mathew P. Jones, MD.

Disclosures: A. J. Chrisman, No Disclosures: I Have No RelevantFinancial Relationships to Disclose.Case Description: A 53-year-old Caucasian woman developedseptic shock secondary to nephrolithiasis. She underwent emergentcystoscopy with stent placement. Postoperatively she requiredmultiple vasopressors and intubation. Her hospital course wasfurther complicated by a myocardial infarction as well as drygangrene of her bilateral hands and feet.Setting: Tertiary Care Hospital.Results or Clinical Course: The patient was originally admittedto the Inpatient Rehabilitation Service prior to any surgical inter-vention. She required maximal assistance of 2 people for transfers.She was discharged to the surgical service twice; first for an upperextremity amputation of the left second through fifth digits andlater for a right below the knee amputation (BKA). Her rehabilita-tion goals included wound care, increasing strength and endurance,and maximizing functional use of her residual limbs in preparationfor future surgery.Discussion: From the time of the initial consult this patientwas particularly challenging. In order to preserve as muchfunctional tissue as possible, the treating surgeons recom-mended performing multiple amputations spread over severalmonths with continuation of intensive therapy and whirlpooldebridement between operations. Several discussions with herinsurance company were necessary to educate them of thebenefit of proceeding in this manner. Had all of her surgeriesbeen performed at once, her thumb would not have been

spared and her BKA would likely have been an above the kneeamputation. The anticipation of being discharged with ampu-tations in all four extremities led to an emotional burden thatmanifested as severe anxiety, making pain control difficult. Itwas not until discharge planning was complete that adequatepain control was achieved.Conclusions: In this case the Physical Medicine and Rehabilita-tion team functioned as patient advocate, pain managementspecialist, counselor and care management coordinator. Theimportance of communication in this case cannot be over-emphasized as her successful rehabilitation will continue to requireteamwork among multiple medical specialists, surgical specialists,therapists and prosthetists as well as the continued financialsupport of her insurance company.

Poster 120Modified Berg Balance Scale for Use in FallPrediction Among Patients with Lumbar SpinePrecautions.Argy Stampas, MD (The Burke Rehabilitation Hospital,White Plains, NY, United States); Libi Galmer, DO;Alexander J. Martinez, MD;Elizabeth A. Dominick, DPT, MS, NCS;Michael V. Gramuglia, DO; Jessica F. Elder, MPH, PhD.

Disclosures: A. Stampas, No Disclosures: I Have No RelevantFinancial Relationships to Disclose.Objective: To test the hypothesis that a modified version of theBerg Balance Scale (BBS) can be used to discriminate fall risk amongpatients with lumbar spine precautions. The BBS was modified(BBSm) to eliminate two items, ‘retrieving object from floor’ and‘turning to look behind’, as these movements are contraindicated inthis patient population. This modified scale ranges from 0-48 withhigher scores indicating greater balance, strength and mobility.Design: Prospective, observational studySetting: Rehabilitation Hospital in White Plains, NYParticipants: 50 consecutive, ambulatory patients with lumbarspine precautions, admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility.Interventions: N/AMain Outcome Measures: Fall incidence from time ofadmission to 6 months.Results or Clinical Course: Among 50 participants, 18 (36%)fell and 32 (64%) did not. While non-fallers had higher dischargeBBSm scores, no statistically significant difference was foundbetween non-fallers (32.7 [SD, 10.3]) and fallers (27.4 [SD, 13.3])using a Wilcoxon two-sample test (p¼0.23). Using logisticregression the BBSm yielded non-significant results for predictionof fall risk. An AUC of 0.61 generated from a Receiver OperatorCharacteristic (ROC) curve further suggests a lack of discriminativeability of BBSm between fallers and non-fallers. Those who fellhowever, tended to be younger (64.7 [SD, 14.4] vs. 72.3 [SD,11.1]) and were more likely to use assistive devices (OR 6.2, (95%CI [1.2, 31.7]).Conclusions: While the BBS has been shown to be a validmeasurement to assess fall risk in the elderly and in stroke patients,even after modifying the scale to facilitate its use among patientswith lumbar spine precautions, no evidence was found to supportits use in discriminating fall risk in this population. Furtherresearch is needed to understand what factors exist for prediction offalls in this population.