1
Analysis of Cannabis for Pesticide Residues by GC/Q-TOF Philip L. Wylie, 1 Chandrani Gon 2 , Mohamed Radwan 2 , Mei Wang, 2 Ikhlas Khan 2,3 and Mahmoud A. ElSohly 2,,4,5 1 Agilent Technologies, Wilmington DE USA; 2 National Center for Natural Products Research,; 3 Department of Biomolecular Sciences, 4 Department of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, School of Pharmacy, MS 38655, USA , 5 ElSohly Laboratory Inc., 5 Industrial Park , Oxford, MS, 38655 USA NACRW 2014 POSTER #61 In the United States, the use of cannabis for medical purposes has been legalized in 29 states. Eight states (CO, WA, OR, NV, CA, AK, ME, and MA) have approved recreational use. Like other crops, marijuana is vulnerable to destructive insects and fungus. Unlike other crops, it is illegal under federal law and therefore the EPA has not approved any pesticides or fungicides for it and there are no federal guidelines for how much residual pesticide can be left on marijuana products. In 2017, Steep Hill Labs in Berkeley, one of the nation’s largest cannabis testing laboratories, tested 44 marijuana products for 16 pesticides. They found 41 out of 44 samples (93 %) tested positive for pesticides at levels high enough that those products would've been banned for sale in some other states that currently regulate the use of pesticides in marijuana products. In this research, we tested pesticide residues in 16 confiscated marijuana samples (from medical marijuana states) as well as marijuana produced at the University of Mississippi outdoor growing facility. QuEChERS extraction was used for sample preparation followed by analysis on an Agilent 7890B/7200B GC/Q-TOF using a new pesticide PCDL and the Find by Fragments workflow in MassHunter software. This approach looks for 852 pesticides, metabolites and other contaminants in each sample. Introduction Results and Discussion (Cont.) Pesticides found in 16 confiscated marijuana samples and marijuana grown by the U. Mississippi Marijuana Program. Note: The fire retardants, Tris(β-chloropropyl)phosphate & Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate, are found widely in dust samples and may have contaminated some of these samples while in storage or elsewhere. For samples that had residues of chlordane and nonachlor, it is likely that they were grown in soil that was contaminated in the past. Conclusions Cannabis is one of the most difficult matrices to work with. High concentrations of cannabinoids and terpenes get extracted along with pesticides using QuEChERS extraction. These heavy interferences can lead to false positives. But, most false positives can be eliminated by looking at the fragment ion ratios, mass and RT accuracy and the molecular ion isotope pattern (when present). 22 pesticides & metabolites, 2 fire retardants and 3 PAHs were found in the 16 samples. The fire retardants, PAHs and banned pesticides likely came from environmental contamination. No pesticides were found in the Marijuana grown at U Miss. Experimental Figure 1. QuEChERS extraction procedure. Result is 0.1 g of Cannabis/mL of ACN. QuEChERS Extraction of Pesticides Results and Discussion Grind sample Weigh 1.5 g Add sample to QuEChERS tube + 15 mL H2O + 15 mL 1% HOAc In CH 3 CN + salt packet. After shaking Centrifuge Transfer 8 mL CH 3 CN to dSPE tubes Shake 2 min then centrifuge Transfer top layer to 2 mL vial Analyze by GC/Q-TOF Shake 30 min PCDL: Personal Compound Database & Library with 852 Pesticides and Common Contaminants Figure 2. Personal Compound Database/Library (PCDL) containing exact mass spectrum, locked RT, CAS#, name, molecular formula, monoisotopic exact mass (and more) for 852 pesticides . The Find by Formula algorithm looks for all 852 pesticides in a sample. Pesticide PCDL Spectrum of tris(β-chloropropyl)phosphate Extracted Ion Chromatograms for the six most significant ions Coelution plot Figure 4. The Agilent Find by Fragments software extracted the six most significant ions for each pesticide in the PCDL at it’s locked RT. The sof- ware looks at the peak shape and RT for each extracted ion. The coelution plot shows the normalized peak heights for each ion relative to a reference ion. Figure 5. Find by Formula results screen for pesticides tentatively identified in a confiscated marijuana sample. The specific results are for Pentachloro- anisole RT Difference From PCDL Ave. Coelution Score # of Qualified Ions Fragment Ratio Score Figure 6. Find by Formula Compound Identification Results showing some of the information available to help identify a “hit.” Figure 7. Compound Identification results for Dichlorvos showing 5 of the 6 ions with excellent coelution scores, good mass accuracy and a close RT match to the PCDL value. Figure 8. Molecular ion isotope pattern for Dichlorvos. Note: M+* is only 1.8% of the base peak. The red rectangles show the theoretical spacing and abundance of the isotopes. Figure 3. Typical chromatogram for a marijuana QuEChERS extract with added analyte protectants. Compound Name M+* Diff (ppm) RT Diff (min) Relative abundance of ions (from PCDL) Coelution Score Fragment ion MW Diff (ppm) Myclobutanil Residue in Cannabis. Myclobutanil decomposes when heated to produce HCN. Fragment abundance ratio = 99.83 Molecular mass difference = 1.82 ppm Qualified ions = 6 RT difference = 0.041 min Molecular ion isotope pattern Heat HCl + HCN H Myclobutanil POPs in Pot: Two samples had cis- and trans-Chlordane and trans-Nonachlor Chlordane Nonachlor Banned for all uses in the US since 1988; Banned by Stockholm POPs Convention in 2001 Sample Pesticide found Sample Pesticide found Sample Pesticide found 1055 Myclobutanil 3402 DEET 3534 Benzylbenzoate Cypermethrin I Dichlorvos Cypermethrin I Cypermethrin III Cypermethrin I Phenanthrene Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate Terbucarb DEET trans-Chlordane gamma-Cyhalothrin Terbucarb Cypermethrin III Acrinathrin Acrinathrin (Rufast) 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene 1271 DEET Diphenylamine Fenpropathrin trans-Nonachlor 3536 Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate 2-phenylphenol cis-Chlordane 1-Naphthol Phenanthrene Phenanthrene Terbucarb 3452 DEET DEET Fenpropathrin Jasmone Carbaryl Phenanthrene Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate 2511 DEET Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate Tributylphosphate Cypermethrin I Empenthrin 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene Cypermethrin III Cypermethrin I Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate 3466 Cypermethrin I Jasmone II Terbucarb Cypermethrin III Acrinathrin 3551 Pentachloroanisole 3400 Phenanthrene Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate Fluoranthene 3483 Cypermethrin III Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate DEET Cypermethrin I Cypermethrin I Pyrene TBP (Tributylphosphate) Cypermethrin III Cypermethrin I Phenanthrene Cypermethrin III 3486 Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate DEET Terbucarb DEET Terbucarb Phenanthrene 3401 Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate 3552 Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate trans-Chlordane 3507 Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate Cypermethrin I Acrinathrin (Rufast) Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate Cypermethrin I 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene Phenanthrene Phenanthrene trans-Nonachlor 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene cis-chlordane 3518 Cypermethrin I Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate Terbucarb 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene U Miss Grown Outdoors No pesticides found L to R: Drs. Wylie, Radwan, Gon & Wang standing in front of the Marijuana Museum Results and Discussion Dr. ElSohly

POSTER #P-61 Analysis of Cannabis for Pesticide Residues ... · Analysis of Cannabis for Pesticide Residues by GC/Q-TOF Philip L. Wylie,1 Chandrani Gon2, Mohamed Radwan2, Mei Wang,2

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    11

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: POSTER #P-61 Analysis of Cannabis for Pesticide Residues ... · Analysis of Cannabis for Pesticide Residues by GC/Q-TOF Philip L. Wylie,1 Chandrani Gon2, Mohamed Radwan2, Mei Wang,2

Analysis of Cannabis for Pesticide Residues by GC/Q-TOF Philip L. Wylie,1 Chandrani Gon2 , Mohamed

Radwan2, Mei Wang,2 Ikhlas Khan2,3 and Mahmoud A. ElSohly2,,4,5

1Agilent Technologies, Wilmington DE USA; 2National Center for Natural Products Research,; 3Department of Biomolecular Sciences, 4Department of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, School of Pharmacy, MS 38655, USA , 5ElSohly Laboratory Inc., 5 Industrial Park , Oxford, MS, 38655 USA

NACRW 2014

POSTER #61

In the United States, the use of cannabis for medicalpurposes has been legalized in 29 states. Eight states (CO,WA, OR, NV, CA, AK, ME, and MA) have approved recreationaluse.

Like other crops, marijuana is vulnerable to destructiveinsects and fungus. Unlike other crops, it is illegal underfederal law and therefore the EPA has not approved anypesticides or fungicides for it and there are no federalguidelines for how much residual pesticide can be left onmarijuana products.

In 2017, Steep Hill Labs in Berkeley, one of the nation’s largestcannabis testing laboratories, tested 44 marijuana productsfor 16 pesticides. They found 41 out of 44 samples (93 %)tested positive for pesticides at levels high enough that thoseproducts would've been banned for sale in some other statesthat currently regulate the use of pesticides in marijuanaproducts.

In this research, we tested pesticide residues in 16confiscated marijuana samples (from medical marijuanastates) as well as marijuana produced at the University ofMississippi outdoor growing facility. QuEChERS extractionwas used for sample preparation followed by analysis on anAgilent 7890B/7200B GC/Q-TOF using a new pesticide PCDLand the Find by Fragments workflow in MassHuntersoftware. This approach looks for 852 pesticides, metabolitesand other contaminants in each sample.

Introduction Results and Discussion (Cont.)

Pesticides found in 16 confiscated marijuana samples andmarijuana grown by the U. Mississippi Marijuana Program.Note: The fire retardants, Tris(β-chloropropyl)phosphate &Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate, are found widely in dustsamples and may have contaminated some of these sampleswhile in storage or elsewhere. For samples that had residuesof chlordane and nonachlor, it is likely that they were grown insoil that was contaminated in the past.

Conclusions

• Cannabis is one of the most difficult matrices to work with.

• High concentrations of cannabinoids and terpenes getextracted along with pesticides using QuEChERSextraction.

• These heavy interferences can lead to false positives.

• But, most false positives can be eliminated by looking atthe fragment ion ratios, mass and RT accuracy and themolecular ion isotope pattern (when present).

• 22 pesticides & metabolites, 2 fire retardants and 3 PAHswere found in the 16 samples.

• The fire retardants, PAHs and banned pesticides likelycame from environmental contamination.

• No pesticides were found in the Marijuana grown at U Miss.

Experimental

Figure 1. QuEChERS extraction procedure. Result is 0.1 gof Cannabis/mL of ACN.

QuEChERS Extraction of Pesticides

Results and Discussion

Grind sample Weigh 1.5 g Add sample to

QuEChERS tube +

15 mL H2O + 15 mL

1% HOAc In CH3CN +

salt packet.

After shaking

CentrifugeTransfer 8 mL CH3CN

to dSPE tubesShake 2 min then

centrifugeTransfer top layer

to 2 mL vial

Analyze by

GC/Q-TOF

Shake 30 min

PCDL: Personal Compound Database & Library with 852 Pesticides and Common Contaminants

Figure 2. Personal Compound Database/Library (PCDL) containingexact mass spectrum, locked RT, CAS#, name, molecular formula,monoisotopic exact mass (and more) for 852 pesticides . The Findby Formula algorithm looks for all 852 pesticides in a sample.

Pesticide PCDL Spectrum oftris(β-chloropropyl)phosphate

Extracted Ion Chromatograms forthe six most significant ions

Coelution plot

Figure 4. The Agilent Find by Fragments software extracted the six most

significant ions for each pesticide in the PCDL at it’s locked RT. The sof-

ware looks at the peak shape and RT for each extracted ion. The coelution

plot shows the normalized peak heights for each ion relative to a reference

ion.

Figure 5. Find by Formula results screen for pesticides tentatively identified

in a confiscated marijuana sample. The specific results are for Pentachloro-

anisole

RT DifferenceFrom PCDL

Ave. CoelutionScore

# of QualifiedIons

Fragment RatioScore

Figure 6. Find by Formula Compound Identification Results showing some

of the information available to help identify a “hit.”

Figure 7. Compound Identification results for Dichlorvos showing 5 of the 6

ions with excellent coelution scores, good mass accuracy and a close RT

match to the PCDL value.

Figure 8. Molecular ion isotope pattern for Dichlorvos. Note: M+* is only

1.8% of the base peak. The red rectangles show the theoretical spacing and

abundance of the isotopes.

Figure 3. Typical chromatogram for a marijuana QuEChERS extractwith added analyte protectants.

CompoundName M+* Diff

(ppm) RT Diff (min)

Relative abundanceof ions (from PCDL)

Coelution Score

Fragment ion MW Diff (ppm)

Myclobutanil Residue in Cannabis. Myclobutanil decomposes when heated to produce HCN.

Fragment abundance ratio = 99.83Molecular mass difference = 1.82 ppmQualified ions = 6RT difference = 0.041 min

Molecular ion isotope pattern

Heat HCl + HCN

H

Myclobutanil

POPs in Pot: Two samples had cis- and trans-Chlordane and trans-Nonachlor

Chlordane Nonachlor

Banned for all uses in the US since 1988; Banned by Stockholm POPs Convention in 2001

Sample Pesticide found Sample Pesticide found Sample Pesticide found

1055 Myclobutanil 3402 DEET 3534 Benzylbenzoate

Cypermethrin I Dichlorvos Cypermethrin I

Cypermethrin III Cypermethrin I Phenanthrene

Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate Terbucarb

DEET trans-Chlordane gamma-Cyhalothrin

Terbucarb Cypermethrin III Acrinathrin

Acrinathrin (Rufast) 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene

1271 DEET Diphenylamine

Fenpropathrin trans-Nonachlor 3536 Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate

2-phenylphenol cis-Chlordane 1-Naphthol

Phenanthrene Phenanthrene

Terbucarb 3452 DEET DEET

Fenpropathrin Jasmone Carbaryl

Phenanthrene Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate

2511 DEET Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate Tributylphosphate

Cypermethrin I Empenthrin 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene

Cypermethrin III Cypermethrin I

Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate 3466 Cypermethrin I Jasmone II

Terbucarb Cypermethrin III

Acrinathrin 3551 Pentachloroanisole

3400 Phenanthrene Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate

Fluoranthene 3483 Cypermethrin III Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate

DEET Cypermethrin I Cypermethrin I

Pyrene TBP (Tributylphosphate) Cypermethrin III

Cypermethrin I Phenanthrene

Cypermethrin III 3486 Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate DEET

Terbucarb DEET Terbucarb

Phenanthrene

3401 Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate 3552 Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate

trans-Chlordane 3507 Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate Cypermethrin I

Acrinathrin (Rufast) Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate

Tris(3-chloropropyl)phosphate Cypermethrin I 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene

Phenanthrene Phenanthrene

trans-Nonachlor 2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene

2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene

cis-chlordane 3518 Cypermethrin I

Tris(b-chloropropyl)phosphate

Terbucarb

2,6-diisopropylnaphthalene

U Miss

Grown

Outdoors

No pesticides found

L to R: Drs. Wylie, Radwan, Gon & Wangstanding in front of the Marijuana Museum

Results and Discussion

Dr. ElSohly