Poster PresentationsToday’s agenda:

Each of you will present your poster describing the publication you have been studying. You must limit your talk to 15 minutes, allowing 1 or 2 minutes for questions and/or comments. All of us will grade each one.

Please also take copious notes during each presentation to provide anonymous feedback to each presenter. Please send you comments to me.

Following any revisions, based on student comments, please e-mail me the final ppt file.

Name

Writing Class student evaluation form for poster presentationsPlease check one of the grade boxes for each student based on his or her presentation and the standards described below.

Grade: Standard:

4.0 Outstanding in all respects: easy to read, good layout, balance of graphics and text, figures well done, clear conclusions, adequate number of references, and quality of presentation. (A)

3.7 Excellent poster: strong in all respects but with one or more aspects showing some weakness. (A-)

3.3 Very good poster: Strong overall but weak in some areas such as graphics, clarity of ideas and logic, organization or text (B+)

3.0 Good poster: Sound in general but some conspicuous weaknesses in important areas such of text, organization, logic and graphics. (B)

2.7 Pretty good poster: A good effort but quite weak in several areas. (B-)

2.3 Fair poster: Difficult to follow, graphics unclear, not logical, too much or too little text, poorly written. (C+)

2.0 Weak poster: Little effort made to understand, organize and present the information. (C)

Name 2.0 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.3 3.7 4.0

Rachael Anderson-Poulakidas

Madelyn Berentson

Christopher Collins-Larsen

Zachary Halls

Jake Kvistad

Check here if you wish to have your own grade determined entirely by Ted. If you check this box the evaluations by other students will not influence your grade.