Upload
dorinkarakoglu
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
1/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 1
Abstract
Full-TextPDF
Full-TextHTML
Full-TextePUB
LinkedReferences
HowtoCitethisArticle
CompleteSpecialIssue
InternationalJournalofDentistryVolume2012(2012),ArticleID151030,13pagesdoi:10.1155/2012/151030
ReviewArticle
PostextractionAlveolarRidgePreservation:BiologicalBasisandTreatments
GiorgioPagni,1GaiaPellegrini ,1WilliamV.Giannobile,2,3andGiulioRasperini1
1UnitofPeriodontology,DepartmentofBiomedical,SurgicalandDentalSciences,UniversityofMilan,FoundationIRCCSCGranda,20142Milan,Italy2DepartmentofPeriodonticsandOralMedicineandMichiganCenterforOralHealthResearch,AnnArbor,
MI,USA3DepartmentofBiomedicalEngineering,CollegeofEngineering,UniversityofMichigan,AnnArbor,MI,USA
Received15February2012;Accepted2April2012
AcademicEditor:FigenCizmeciSenel
Copyright2012GiorgioPagnietal.Thisisanopenaccess articledistributedundertheCreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,whichpermitsunrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalworkisproperlycited.
Abstract
Followingtoothextraction,thealveolarridgeundergoesaninevitableremodelingprocessthatinfluencesimplanttherapyof theedentulouarea.Socketgraftingisacommonlyadoptedtherapyforthepreservationofalveolarbonestructuresincombinationornotwithimmediatimplantplacementalthoughthebiological baseslyingbehind thistreatmentmodalityarenot fullyunderstoodandoftenmisinterpretedThis review is intended to clarifythe literature support tosocketgrafting inorder toprovide practitionerswith valid tools tomakeconsciousdecisionofwhenandwhytorecommendthistherapy.
1.Introduction
Anatomicalchangesandphysiologicalprocessestakingovertoothextractionwerestudiedinthepast[13];however,sincetheintroductionofdentalimplantsinmodernodontology,theseissuesandthepreventionofedentulousjawatrophyhavebecomeveryhottopics.Thsurvival of implants and theirability toprovide adequate functionand esthetic arestrictlycorrelatedwith their properpositioning inrelationtothealveolarhousing,theneighboringteethandtheoccludingdentition.Itisthuseasilyunderstoodthetremendouseffortthathas beenused bymany researchers and practitioners in reducing thisunavoidablemodelingand remodelingprocess. Thisarticlegoethroughthebiologicalbasisforsocketaugmentationprocedureandtheavailabletreatmentoptionstopreventedentulousridgeatrophy.
2.AlveolarRidgeRemodeling
Maxillary andmandibular bony complexes are composed by several anatomical structures with a proper function, composition, andphysiology:(i) basalbonethatdevelopstogetherwiththeoverallskeleton,andformsthebodyofmandibleandmaxilla;(ii)alveolarprocesthatdevelopsfollowingtootheruptionandcontainsthetoothalveolus;(iii)thebundlebonethatlinesthealveolarsocket,extendscoronallyforming the crestof thebuccalbone,andmakespartof theperiodontalstructureas itencloses the external terminationsof periodontafibres(Sharpeysfibers).
After tooth extraction, bundle bone appears to be the first bone tobe absorbed [46] whereas alveolar bone is gradually absorbedthroughoutlife[7,8].Theremodelingprocessresultsinaridgemorphologyreducedinverticalheightandmorepalatalinrelationtotheoriginaltoothposition[13,9].
Studiesfromanotherresearchgroupsuggestbone resorptiontooccur in2 phases (seeFigure 1).Duringthefirstphase,bundleboneisrapidlyresorbedandreplacedwithwovenboneleadingtoagreatreductioninboneheightespeciallyinthebuccalaspectofthesocket,asitcrestalportioniscomprisedsolelyofbundlebone[ 10].Thebuccalplateexperiencesmoreresorptionevenbecauseitisgenerallythinner
HindawiPublishingCorporation
International Journal of Dentistry
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/http://www.hindawi.com/48429076/http://www.hindawi.com/71474535/http://www.hindawi.com/63082720/http://www.hindawi.com/74809096/http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030.pdfhttp://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/abs/http://www.hindawi.com/http://www.hindawi.com/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B10http://www.hindawi.com/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B10http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B9http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B3http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B1http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B8http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B7http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B6http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B4http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B3http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B1http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/http://www.hindawi.com/74809096/http://www.hindawi.com/63082720/http://www.hindawi.com/71474535/http://www.hindawi.com/48429076/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/si/470621/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/cta/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ref/http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030.epubhttp://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030.pdfhttp://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/abs/7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
2/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 2
averaging0.8mminanteriorteethand1.1mminpremolarsites[11].In-vitroanimalstudieshavedemonstratedtheosteogenicpotentialoPDL-derivedcells[12,13]althoughtheroleofbundleboneinprovidingcellsfortheregenerationofnewbonehasbeenmorerecentlychallenged[14]asnewboneformationappearstoinitiatefromthesurroundingalveolarbonecells[46].Thisgroup reported that thpresenceorabsenceofPDLintheextractionsocketdoesnotinfluencethefeaturesofhealingafter3months[15].Duringthesecondphasethe outer surface of the alveolar bone is remodeled causing an overall horizontal and vertical tissue contraction. The reason for thiremodelingprocessisstillnotwellunderstood.Disuseatrophy,decreasedbloodsupply,andlocalizedinflammationmightplayimportantroles in bone resorption. However,i t isnowapparent thatbone remodelingisa complexprocess involving structural, functional,andphysiologicfactorsandthatsurgicaltraumafromextractioninducesmicrotraumatosurroundingbone,whichacceleratesboneremodelin[16].
Figure1:Healingoftheextractionsocketwithandwithoutsocketgrafting.Whensocketgraftingisnotadopted,majoralveolarridge resorptionoccurs.Ina firstphase,initiallythebloodclot, subsequentlythegranulationtissueandlatertheprovisional matrixand thewovenbonefill upthe alveolus. Thebundle bone is completelyresorbed causingareduction inthevertical ridge. Ina second phase, thebuccalwall and thewoven bone are remodeledcausing thehorizontal and further vertical ridge reduction. Whensocket grafting is adopted, the first phase and vertical bonereductionstilloccur,however,thesecondphaseandthehorizontalcontractionarereduced.
Resorptionrateofthealveolarridgesisfasterduringthefirstsixmonthsfollowingtheextraction[9,17]andproceedsatanaverageof0.51.0%peryearfortheentirelife[7,8].Theheightofahealedsocketneverreachesthecoronallevelofboneattachedtotheextractedtoothandhorizontalresorptionseemstobegreaterin themolar regioncompared tothepremolar area [18,19].Schroppetal.estimatedtwothirdsofthehard andsofttissuechangesoccurin thefirst3months.Theauthorsreported50%ofcrestalwidthtobe lostina12-monthperiod(correspondingto6.1mm;range2.7to12.2mm),2/3ofwhich(3.8mm;30%)occurredinthefirst12weeks.Whenexaminingthepremolarareaonly,alossof alveolarridgewidthof 4.9mm(45%)wasreported,ofwhich3.1mm(28.4%)occurredinthefirst12week
[20].Arecentlypublishedsystematicreview[21] reportedagreaterhorizontal alveolarridge reduction(2963%;3.79mm)thanverticaboneloss(1122%;1.24mmonthebuccal,0.84mmonmesial,and0.80ondistalsites)at6months.Inalong-termstudy,Ashmanreportedanalveolarboneshrinkageof4060%inheightandwidthwithinthefirst2-3years[8,22].
3.SocketHealing
Immediatelyaftertoothextraction,thealveolarsocketisfilledbybloodclotthatisreplacedbygranulationtissuewithin1week(seeFigur1)[23].Inthehealingofaskinwound,epithelialcellsmigrateunderneathandareprotectedbythebloodclot.Insockethealinginstead,thepithelium migrates over the granulation tissue to cover the healing socket [24]. This happens because this inflammatory tissue irecognizedasaconnective tissueby theepithelial cells,therefore, cellularmigrationoccursover itssurface.This is importantwhenwexamineguidedboneregenerationappliedtosocketgrafting.Startingfromtheapicalandlateralresidualbonywalls,thegranulationtissueisrapidlyremodeledtoprovisionalmatrix.Mineralizingprocessesoccurleadingtotheformationofwovenbonethateventuallyisreplacedbymaturelamellarbone[25].Formoreinformationonsockethealingstages,pleaserefertoTable 1.
Table1:Healingof theextraction socket.Articles reporting timing and histological evidence of extraction sockethealingeventsarereported.
Earlyhumanhistologicalinvestigationsreportedthatextractionsocketsarefilledwithdelicatecancellousboneintheirapicaltwothirdsa10 weeks, and they are completely filled with bone at 15 weeks [24]. Increased radiopacity is demonstrated as soon as 38 days andradiopacitysimilar tothatof thesurroundingboneat105days[24].These figuresmight bepartiallybiasedasspecimenswereharvestedfromcadavers;thereforetheirlateageandtheirsystemicconditionmighthaveledtodelayedwoundhealingcapabilities.Ontheothersideanimalstudiesdemonstrateacceleratedhealingas3weeksoldextractionsocketsinhumanscomparewith9-10daysoldsocketsindogsanda3.5monthssocketsinhumanscompareswith8weekssocketsindogs[26].
4.RationaleforExtractionSocketPreservation
Boneformationinthealveolarsocketisanaturallyoccurringeventaslongassurroundingalveolarwallsremainintact;however,thealveolarridgevolumetriccontractionmayimpairimplantplacement.
Toreduceloss of alveolarbone to acceptablelevels, several surgicaltechniqueshave beenproposed.Reducing theextractiontraumaandlimiting flap elevation [31] are essential for obtaining success in each of these procedures. Animal studies show mixed results whenevaluatingdifferencesinridgeremodelingbetweenflappedandnonflappedextractionsockets[ 3136]althoughit hasbeenhypothesizedthatbydisruptingthethinlayerofcellsthatcomprisestheosteogeniclayeroftheadultperiosteum,theelevationofaflapmightdiminishthe ability ofperiosteal cells to regeneratebone, whileanundisturbedperiosteummaintains its osteogenicpotential [10, 3739]. It ipossible that flap elevation affects alveolar dimensional alterations only in the short-term [21],while in the long term no appreciabldifferencesarefound[ 36].Inguidedboneregeneration4,methodscanbeusedtoincreasetherateofboneformationandtoaugmentbonvolume:osteoinductionby theuseofappropriategrowthfactors;osteoconduction,whereagraftingmaterialservesasa scaffoldfornewbonegrowth;distractionosteogenesis,bywhichafracture is surgicallyinducedandbonefragmentsarethenslowlypulledapart;finallyguidedtissueregeneration,whichallowsspacesmaintainedbybarriermembranestobefilledwithnewbone[40].Utilizingtheseconcepts
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B36http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B32http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B21http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B35http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B33http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B10http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B32http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B27http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B27http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B26http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B24http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B24http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/tab1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B25http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B24http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B23http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B22http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B8http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B21http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B20http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B19http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B18http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B8http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B7http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B17http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B9http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B16http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B15http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B6http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B4http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B14http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B13http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B12http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B11http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/tab1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig1/7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
3/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 3
ithasbeenproposedguidedboneregenerationwithnonresorbableandabsorbablemembranes,severaltypesofbonegraftswithorwithouuseofbarriermembranesortheadditionofmucogingivaltreatments,andmorerecentlytheuseofbioactivemoleculesforthegenerationobonein the extractionsocket.Whenanalyzing the results of the following describedstudies,it shouldbe keptinmindthe goalof thadditionalservicethatisprovidedtothepatient,whichincludethefollowing:
Inthefollowingsections,severalarticlesattemptingtoobtainthesepurposesbymeansofalveolarridgepreservationwillbereviewedandbrieflysummarized.
4.1.RidgePreservationwithMembranes
Guided boneregeneration(GBR) techniques utilize barriermembranes to refrain gingival cellsfrom penetrating into thedefect to bregenerated.TheconceptofcompartmentalizationwasintroducedbyMelcher[ 39]toexplainperiodontalwoundhealing,butitmaynotbapplicabletosockethealing.Ifitwere,onewouldexpectthesockettobefilledwithsofttissueinallinstances.Ontheotherside,evenearlyobservationsinhumansandanimalsdemonstratedthatthealveolarsockettendstohealbyregenerationofboneuptothealveolarcrest.Ainperiodontalwoundhealing[4143],thestabilityofthebloodclotpreviouslydescribedexplainswhythecompartmentalizationconceptdoesnot result in asocket filledby epitheliumand howepithelialcellsmigrateover the granulation tissueto close the healingsocketQuestionsremainastowhetherbarriermembraneshaveaneffectinmaintainingalveolarridgemorphology.
In 1997, Lekovic and coworkers adopted nonabsorbableePTFE membranes for the preservation of the alveolar ridge following toothextraction.Nochangesinclinicalmeasureswerenotedinthetestsitesthatremainedprotectedfor6monthswhilesignificantvolumetricchangeswereobservedincontrolsitesandintestsitesexperiencingmembraneexposure[44].Pinhoandcoworkersevaluatedtheuseofatitaniummembranewithorwithoutautologousbonegraft.Theyfoundnosignificantdifferencesbetweengroupsand,therefore,concludedthatspacemaintenanceismoreimportantthantheuseofgraftingmaterialsinthetreatmentofextractionsockets[ 45].
Barriermembranesseemtominimizealveolarboneresorptionwhencomparedtononintact(released)periosteumregardlessoftheuseoadditional grafting material. Titaniummembranes certainlywouldhave adistinctly different mechanism of action when compared toresorbablemembranes thaton theotherside reducethepotential ofexposure anddonot requireasecond surgicalintervention fortheiremoval. In1998,Lekovicetal.examined the effectofglycolideand lactidepolymermembranesdemonstratingreducedlossofalveolaheight,moreinternalbonesocketbonefillandlesshorizontalresorptionthancontrols[46].Luczyszynetal.evaluatedtheeffectofacelluladermal matrixwith orwithout aresorbable hydroxylapatite graft.Both groups preservedridge thickness, although, betterresultswerachievedinthecombinedtreatmentgroupsuggestingthatbonegraftsmightbenefitboneregenerationwhenusingaresorbablemembrane[47].
Arecentstudyperformedadetailedevaluationofthehealingofextractionsocketscoveredwitharesorbablecollagenmembrane.Throughtheuseofhistologicalevaluation,subtractionradiography,andof-CTanalysis,thisstudydemonstratedthatadequateboneformationfoimplantplacementoccursasearlyas12weeksfollowingtoothextraction,withinsignificantchangesinalveolarridgedimensions[48].
4.2.RidgePreservationwithBoneGraftsandBoneSubstitutes
Theclinicaladvantagesofbonefillersinalveolarridgevolumepreservationandpreventionofadditionalbonegraftingprocedurearelargelysupportedbytheavailableliterature[47,4951].Minimalridgeremodelinghasbeenobservedwhenusingnonresorbablehydroxyapatitecrystalscoveredbyarotatedpediculatedsplitthicknesspalatalflap[52],DFDBAcoveredwithanePTFEmembrane[53],orevenallogenicorxenogenic bone grafts coveredwith nothing but a collagen plug [51, 54] (Figure 1). Histological evidence demonstrates that bonformationoccursoverthesurfaceoftheimplantedosteoconductivegraftparticles[ 55,56].At 3monthsorlater,graftedsocketsgenerallydemonstratehighermineralized tissuefigures,whenconsidering bothnew vitalbone andremaining graftparticles,butthe formationonewboneappearstobesimilaringraftedandnongraftedsites.Itcanbeextrapolatedthatresidualparticlesoccupypartofthevolumethawouldhavebeenoccupiedbybonemarrowifbonegraftingwerenotadopted[57].
At earlierhealing stages (2weeks) instead, grafted sockets demonstrate xenograft particles enclosed in connective tissue andcoated bymultinucleated cellswhennongrafted sitesalreadyshownewly formedwoven bone occupyingmostof the socket[58].Thisresponseitypical ofa foreignbody reactionwhich canbe elicitedby the xenograftand though it is clinically non-immunogenic,non-toxic andchemicallyinert[59],it resultsinadelayedhealingresponseduringtheearlieststagesofsockethealing.Manyarticlesreportedonlyapartiaresorptionofthegraftedparticlesatshortandlongtimepoints[49,53,58,6063]arisingdoubtsontheachievementoftheosteointegratioof implants inserted inaugmentedsites andonthe successof the restorative therapy.Histological animal studies[64, 65] evaluated thosteointegration ofdental implants following boneregeneration performed with different bone fillersand observeda bone-to-implancontactsimilartothatofimplantsplacedinpristinebone(40%to65%).Furthermore,clinicalstudiesobservedthatgoodprimarystabilitycanbereachedatimplantinsertion,thatthegraftingproceduredoesnotimpairearlyosteointegration[66,67],andthatimplantsplacedinboneregeneratedusingmineralizedgraftsareabletosustainloadingandprovidesimilarlong-termresultsasthoseplacedinpristinebon[68].
Mineralizedgraftingmaterialsmayinterferewiththeearlieststagesofsockethealingandtheireliminationmayrequireseveralyears[57]o
(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi)
toenableinstallationandstabilityofadentalimplant,toreducelossofalveolarbonevolume,toreduceneedforadditionalbonegraftingprocedures,toenablethegeneratedtissuestoprovideimplantosseointegration,toimprovetheestheticoutcomeofthefinalprosthesis,toregeneratebonefasterallowingearlierimplantationandrestoration.
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B53http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B64http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B63http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B62http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B61http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B60http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B59http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B56http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B54http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B49http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B45http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B55http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B54http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B53http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B52http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B51http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig1/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B50http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B47http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B49http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B48http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B47http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B45http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B43http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B44http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B43http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B42http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B41http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B40http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B39http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B37http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B357/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
4/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 4
theymayinfactbenonresorbableeveninthelongterm[62].Ontheotherside,theirabilitytopreventcrestalridgeresorptionandsustainlong-termimplantsuccesshasbeenclearlydemonstrated[ 6668].
Otheradvantagesintheuseofosteoconductivegraftingmaterialwerereportedbyaclinicalandhistologicalhumanstudyofpostextractivdefectsinposteriormaxillaryareatreatedwithaxenogenicgraft.Inthisstudy,Rasperinietal.confirmedthespace-maintainingactivityotheimplantedmaterialandreportedadecreaseddemandforsinusliftaugmentationprocedurewhenthesocketpreservationprocedurewaperformed[63].Throughacomputedtomographyanalysisofmaxillaryanteriorpostextractivedefects,Nevins etal.reportedthat79%ografted sitesunderwent lessthan 20%buccalplateloss,while71%of nongraftedsitesdemonstratedmorethan20%buccalplateloss.Aninterestingfindingofthisinvestigationwasthateventheexperiencedsurgeonsparticipatingtothisstudywerenotabletopredictthefateothebuccalplate,therefore,theauthorssuggestedsocketgraftingtobeperformedatthetimeofextraction[ 69].
4.2.1.BuccalBoneOverbuilding
Anothertechniquethatmaybeadoptedistoaugmentthebuccalbonebyimplantinggraftmaterialsonitsbuccalsurface.Simonetal.usedDFDBAcoveredbyabioabsorbablemembranefortheaugmentationprocedure.Thedimensionsontheridgewereaugmentedcomparedtothe originalvolume butthe invasivenessandtechnical demandof thisprocedure mayrefrainthe clinicianfrom itsuse ineverydaypractice[70].Inanotherstudy,2differentgraftingtechniqueswereadoptedaccordingtowhetherthebuccalbonewasintactordehiscenceSocketswithanintactbuccalboneweregraftedtothelevelofthealveolarcrest,amembranewasusedtoprotectthedefect,andtheflapwaclosed by primary intention while sockets with deficient buccal bone were augmented. Their results showed complete loss of thhorizontallyaugmentedboneinaugmentedsites,butgraftedsitedexperiencedbonelossinagreaterextentthanaugmentedsites[ 71].
Anhistologicalanimalstudyfoundthatbuccalboneaugmentationwithaxenograftfailedtopreventthephysiologicalbonemodelingandremodelingtakingpartinthebuccalandlingualbonywalls;however,theinsertionof graftingmaterialseemedto promotedenovohardtissueformation,thuslimitingthetotalbonevolumecontraction[57].Xenograftparticlespositionedonthebuccalsurfaceoftheextractionalveoluswerefoundtobeencapsulatedincollagenfibersafter3monthsofhealing.Theywerealwayslocatedlateraltotheperiosteumofth
buccalwalland,therefore,didnotparticipatetoridgeaugmentation[57].Ficklandcoworkersalsoproposedtheoverbuildingofthebuccabonewithaxenograftandamembrane.Datafromtheirstudies indicatesthatextrasocketgraftingdoesnotseemto compensateforridgalterationafterextractionpossiblybecauseoftheadditionaltraumatobuccaltissues[72,73].
4.2.2.FreeSoft-TissueGraftsoverGraftedSockets
Theplacement of free soft-tissue graft to cover the augmented alveolar socket was introduced to minimize the soft tissue shrinkageoptimize aestheticalresultsofimplant restoration,andobtaina primaryclosurethatmay preservethegraftfrombacterialinfections andsecondary graft failure [74, 75]. The first attempt to cover the socket graftwith an autogenous soft tissue implantwas described byLandsbergandBichachoin1994[76].NevinsandMellonigsuggestedtheuseofsofttissuegraftstoimproveridgetopographyaftertoothextraction[77]andincombinationwithimmediateimplantplacement[78].
In1999,Taldescribedthesurvivalof circularconnectivetissuegraftsplacedoverextractionsocketstreatedeitherwithDFDBAorBio-OssTheyfoundthatthesurvivalwasnotdependentontheadoptedgraftandthatat1week18/42graftswerevital,13/42werepartiallyvital,and11/42werenonvital.Completeclosureofallsocketsoccurred4weekspostextraction.Theauthorsnotedthatmoreoftenpartiallyvitalgraft
maintainedtheirvitalityoverthesocketareamorethanonthegraftmargins;theyconcludedthatthenourishmentcouldbeoriginatedfromplasmaticelementsinthesocketbloodclotmorethanfromvesselsoriginatingfromtheperipheryofthegraft[79].
4.3.ImmediateImplantPlacementandtheJumpingDistance.
The first report ofimplantplacement immediatelyaftertoothextractiondatesback to1978when theTbingenimmediateimplantwadescribed[8082].In1991,Barzilayetal.suggestedthatimmediateimplantplacementmightreduceoreliminatealveolarridgeresorptionduring the initial healingof the alveolar extractionsocket [83]. In two subsequent papers in amonkeymodel, he demonstrated thasubstantiallylessridgeremodelingwasinducedintheimmediateimplantgroup[ 84]andthathistologicallybonetoimplant contactwasimilarwithinthedifferentanatomicregionsoftheoralcavity[85].
OtherauthorschallengedtheresultsoftheCanadianreportingthattheplacementofanimplantinthefreshextractionsitefailedtopreventhe remodelingthat occurred in thewallsof thesocket.Theheightofthebuccal andlingualwallsat3monthswas similarcompared toextractiononlysites[8690].Verticalbonelosswasmorepronouncedatthebuccalaspectevenwithsomemarginallossofosseointegration[87].Histologically, thegapbetweentheimplant andthesocketwallsfilledinat4 weekswithwovenbone,while, thebuccal andlinguawallsunderwentmarkedsurfaceresorption.After12weeks,thebuccalcrestwaslocated>2 mmapicaloftheimplantmargin[88](Figure2)Evaluatingimmediatelyplacedimplants,Schroppetal.reported70%ofthe3-wallinfrabonydefectswithaparallelwidthofupto5 mm,depth ofmaximum4mm,and aperpendicular widthofmaximum2 mmhada capacityof spontaneoushealingwithina period of 3months[18]. Botticelli et al. found that11.25mm wideand 5mmdeep defectsaround implantshealed uneventfullywith orwithoumembrane[91].Defectsupto2.25mmwidewerefoundtohealusingbarriermembranes,althoughwhenthebuccalbonewasintentionallyremoved,lessregenerationatthebuccalaspectswasobserved[92].Thesestudiesadoptedananimalmodelwithsurgicallycreateddefectswhichtypicallyexhibitlesserresorptionthanextractionsockets[90].
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B86http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B88http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B87http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B18http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig2/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B84http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B83http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B86http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B82http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B81http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B80http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B79http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B78http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B76http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B75http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B74http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B73http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B72http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B71http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B70http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B69http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B68http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B53http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B53http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B67http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B66http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B65http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B59http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B64http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B62http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B587/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
5/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 5
Figure2:Healingof theextractionsocket,with postextractive implantplacement,withandwithoutsocketgrafting.Aftertoothextractionandimmediateimplantplacement,thebloodclotfillstheremainingspaceandthebundleboneundergoesthephysiologicalchanges.Whengraftingmaterialisplacedaroundtheimplantsurface,fillingtheremainingsocketarea,thebuccalbonewallremodelingprocessiscorrupted,thusleadingthemaintenanceofthehorizontalridgevolume.
When immediateimplantplacement isadopted,manycliniciansfeeltheneedof filling thebuccal gap (i)by placingalargerdiameteimplant,(ii)byplacingtheimplantinamorebuccalposition,or(iii)bygraftingthebuccaldefectwithsomekindofbonesubstitutesGiven theavailableliterature,the firsttwo strategiesdonotseemtoberecommendable. Itseemsinsteadthatthepresenceofalarge gap
betweenthebuccalwallandtheimplantapparentlypromotesnewboneformationandenhancesthelevelofbone-to-implantcontact[ 88].
An implant position 0.8mmdeeper andmore lingual in relation to the center of the socket results in a lesser degree of buccal bondehiscence[93].Otherstudiesdemonstratedthattheclosertheimplantisto thebuccalbonyplate,themorethe buccalboneresorbs[9495].Bone resorptionof the buccalcrestismorepronouncedwhenplacing large size(5mm) root-formed implantswhen compared tocylindricalimplantswithasmallerdiameter(3.3mm)demonstratingthatimplantsplacedimmediatelyaftertoothextractionfailtopreservthealveolarcrestofthe socketirrespectiveof theirdesign orconfiguration[96].Moreover,softtissuesfollowedbonelevelsand alsotheywerelocatedmoreapicalonlargesizeimplantscomparedtosmallersizeimplants[ 97].
Canevaetal.evaluatedtheuseofacollagenmembraneoverthebuccalgapofimmediatelyplacedimplantsandfoundthatthealveolarcresoutlinewasbettermaintainedatthetestsitescomparedwiththecontrolsitesevenifthebuccalgapwasrelativelysmall[ 98].Interestinglyenhancedbonepreservationwasfoundwhen usingdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral particlesand acollagenmembranecomparedtocontrolswhereasno suchbenefitwasnotedwhenusing magnesium-enrichedhydroxyapatite[99101]. RecentlyArajo and coworkerhaveevaluatedtheuseofBio-OssCollageninthevolumebetweenthebuccalwallandtheimplantincasestreatedwithimmediateimplan
placementin anexperimentalanimalmodel.Theauthorsfound thatthis treatmentmodified theprocessofhardtissuehealing,providedadditional amountsof hard tissue atthe entranceof the previous socket,improved the level ofmarginal bone-to-implantcontact, andpreventedsofttissuerecession[102](Figure2).
Implants immediatelyplacedinto freshextractionsocketsareclassifiedasType1 implants, earlyplacedimplants (48weeks) followingtoothextractionareType2implants,Type3implantsrepresentimplantsearlyplaced(1216weeks)inasocketwithpartialbonehealingandType4implantsaredelayedimplantsplacedinafullyhealededentuloussite(>6month)[ 103].Timingofimplantplacementisnotatopictobetreatedin thisreviewbut itmightbeofinterest tothereader thatbonegrafting inearlyplacedimplants(Type2-3)seemstoprovidebetterhardtissuedimensionsandwithlesspostoperativecomplicationsthanbonegraftingindelayedimplants(Type4)[104].
Whenevaluatingtheexpressionofosteogenesis-relatedgrowthfactors,Linetal.demonstratedapparenttissuematurationdelayedduringosseointegration, compared to extraction socket bone repair. The two healing models developed distinct features and triggeredcharacteristic coordinated expression and orchestration of transcription factors, growth factors, extracellular matrix molecules, andchemokines. These groundbreaking findings open new horizons to researchers, which might lead to a better understanding of th
cooperativemoleculardynamicsinalveolarbonehealing[105].4.4.RidgePreservationwithNonmineralizedGrafts
Serinoetal.evaluatedtheuseofabioabsorbablepolylactide-polyglycolideacidspongeasaridgepreservationgraftingmaterial.Thegraftingmaterialwas placed with no attempt to achieveprimary intention wound closure. 6months following the extractions, biopsies werharvested. Both test and control extractionsockets showedmature andwell-structured bone with no residual particles of the graftedmaterial.Clinicalmeasuresseemedtofavorthetestgroup[106].Inafollowingstudy,boththeregeneratedsitesandcontrolsresultedinthformationofahighlymineralizedandwell-structuredbonewiththe controlgroupshowingaslightlyminorpercentageofmineralizedbone and ahigherpresenceof connective tissue in the coronalportion of the biopsies.Particles of the graftedmaterial couldnotbidentifiedinanyofthebiopsies[107].
Graftingmaterials with high resorption rates allow for the formation of bonewith no residual graft particles at the time of implanplacementandloadingbuttheirabilitytosustainalveolarridgevolumeinthelongtermmightbeinferiortothatofmineralizedgrafts.
4.5.NovelTissueEngineeringApproachesInordertoovercomethelimitationsofroutinelyadoptedbiomaterialsasallografts,xenografts,andalloplastsintermsofpredictabilityandqualityofboneformationandabilitytosustainalveolarridgemorphologyover longperiodsof time,noveltissueengineering therapiehavebeendevelopedincludingthedeliveryofgrowthfactorsincorporatedincarriers,thestimulationoftheselectiveproductionofgrowthfactorsusinggenetherapy,andthedeliveryofexpandedcellularconstructs.
Bonemorphogenicproteins(BMPs)areanexampleofgrowthfactors;theyhavetheabilityofinducingthedifferentiationofthehoststemcellsintoboneformingcellsinaprocessknownas osteoinduction[108].A feasibilitystudyintroducingtheuseofrhBMP-2absorbedincollagenspongefor alveolarridgepreservationaftertoothextractionwaspublished in1997.Howellet al.demonstratedthesafetyofthigraftingmaterial.Patients receiving socketgraftingdemonstrated increase inboneheightwhilepatientsreceiving aridgeaugmentationprocedure showed no evidence of augmented ridge width or height [109]. Implants placed in the regenerated bone were stable andpresentedhealthyperiimplanttissues[110].Afterthispilotstudy,Fioreliniandcoworkersperformedarandomizedclinicaltrialtestingthregenerative potential of the recombinant BMP-2 in the collagen sponge compared to the useof the collagen sponge alone.Anteriomaxillarypostextractionalveolardefectsinwhichmorethan50%ofthealveolarbuccalbonehadbeenlostpriortoextractionweretreated
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B106http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B105http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B104http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B103http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B102http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B101http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B100http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B99http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig2/http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B98http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B97http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B95http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B94http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B93http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B92http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B91http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B90http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B89http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B84http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/fig2/7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
6/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 6
witheitherof the twograftingmaterial.Twodifferent rhBMP-2concentrationswereused(0.75mg/mL and1.50mg/mL).Significantlygreater augmentationwas noted in the 1.50mg/mL group and both rhBMP-2 groups outperformed the control groups. Histologicafindingsshowedgenerationofbonenodifferentfromnativebone[111].
PDGF-BBina-TCPcarrierisamaterialacceptedfromtheFDAforregenerationofboneandPDLelementsinguidedtissueregenerationprocedures.Nevinsetal. evaluatedtheuseof therecombinantprotein in socketgrafting. Inthis case,series8extraction socketsreceivedBio-OssCollagenhydratedwith0.3 mg/mLPDGF-BB,andflapswerereleasedforclosurebyprimaryintention.Then4or6monthsaftergraftingbonecore,biopsiesrevealedrobustboneformation.Also %newboneand residual graftingmaterialwerenoted at 4 months. However, % new bone and % residual grafting material were noted at 6 months in thehystomorphometricalevaluation[112].Morerecently,tissuerepair cells(TRC), acellconstructderived fromeachpatientsbonemarrowandcultivatedusingautomatedbioreactorstoconcentrationsnotachievablethroughasimplebonemarrowaspiration,wereevaluatedinsockethealing.Thisstudyshowedthatthiscellconstructisabletoproducesignificantconcentrationsofcytokinesandmaintainsthecellsability to differentiate toward both the mesenchymaland endothelial pathway andproduceangiogenic factors. TRC therapy enhancedformationof highly vascularmature bone asearlyas 6weeksafter implantationwhen compared toguided boneregeneration withnoseriousstudy-relatedadverseeventreportedandlowerdegreesofalveolarridgeresorptionwerenoted[113,114].Pleaserefertoourrecenreviewforfurtherinformationoncelltherapyapplicationsincraniofacialregeneration[115].
5.Conclusions
Postextractionalveolarridgeresorptionisaninevitableprocessandthemolarareaisnotanexception.Molarridgespresenthigherdegreeof resorptionthan premolarareas do.Socket grafting techniqueshave been readily adopted bydentists throughout the world.A greaamountofresearchhasbeenconductedtoexaminetheeffectivenessofseveralmaterialsormembranes.
Theuseof invasivetechniques ishardly recommendedat thistreatment timepointas anyprocedure requiringprimary intentionhealingwiththe advancementof flapsmay result in increased inflammatory response,in adecrease in vestibulardepth,and in the creationounaestheticscars.Evenexpertpractitionersmightnotbeableto accuratelydeterminewhenthesetechniquesmightbeindicated[69].Fotheverysamereason,lessinvasivegraftingtechniquesshouldbeadoptedwhenindicatedespeciallywhentreatingdefectsintheestheticormolarareas.Itshouldbeunderstoodthattheuseofosteoconductive-mineralizedgraftsdoesnotacceleratebonehealing,butmayallowfoabetterpreservationoftheridgevolumethatishighlydesirableforbothestheticandfunctionofthefutureimplantrestoration.Moreoveinvasiveproceduresasguidedboneregenerationandsinusfloorelevationarelessfrequentlyneededwhensocketgraftingisadopted[ 63]Formorepredictableresults,itisrecommendedtoallowpropertimeforbonehealingpriortoproceedwithimplantplacement.Anyway,whenimmediateimplantplacementisadopted,theuseofmineralizedgraftsonthebuccalgaphelpsreducingtheresorptionofthebuccalcrestbone[102]and maylessenthechances forundesirablehardand soft tissuerecessions.Clinicians shouldescape the temptationoplacinglargerdiameterimplantsorplacingtheimplantinamorebuccalpositioninordertofillthebuccalgap.Instead,alargergapshouldbepreservedandthebuccaldefectshouldbefilledwithbonesubstitutes.
Therationaleforafranklypalatal/lingualpositioningofimmediatelyplacedimplantsisalsosupportedbytheknowledgethatsignificantlymorefacialrecessionsarecorrelatedwithimplantsplacedtoobuccal[ 116,117].
Advancesintissue engineeringtechniquesmightsoonprovidepractitionerswithbiomaterials foramorepredictable andenhancedboneformationthatwill definitely improveourclinical results.Thesenovel biomaterials arecurrently evaluatedworldwide andwillsoonbeintroducedineverydaypractice.
Practitionersshouldbewellinformedofthebiologicalcharacteristicsofnewbiomaterialsandonwhichstagesofwoundhealingmaytheytakeanaction.
Thispaperattemptedtosummarizetheconceptsonsocketgraftingresultingfromtheavailableliterature.Currentknowledgemaystillbeinsufficienttofullyjustifytheuseofcertaintechniquesineverydaypractice,andmorestudiesevaluatingbasicbiologicalconceptsshouldbeperformed.
Insocketgraftingasinothermedicaldivisions,properdiagnosisisoftenmoreimportantthantherenderedtreatment.
References
1. M.H.Cryer,TheInternalAnatomyoftheFace,Lea&Febiger,Philadelphia,Pa,USA,2ndedition,1916.
2. W. Rogers and E. Applebaum,Changes in the mandible following closureof the bite with particular reference to edentuloupatients,JournaloftheAmericanDentalAssociation,vol.28,p.1573,1941.
3. J.PietrokovskiandM.Massler,Ridgeremodelingaftertoothextractioninrats,JournalofDentalResearch,vol.46,no.1,pp.222231,1967.ViewatScopus
4. P.J. Boyne,Osseousrepairofthepostextractionalveolusinman,OralSurgery,OralMedicine,OralPathology,vol.21,no.6,pp805813,1966.ViewatScopus
5. Y.D.Hsieh,H.Devlin,andC.Roberts,Early alveolarridge osteogenesisfollowingtoothextractioninthe rat,Archives ofOraBiology,vol.39,no.5,pp.425428,1994.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
6. H.DevlinandP.Sloan,Earlybonehealingeventsin thehumanextractionsocket,InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacia
http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0028432767&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=3ab66a8f7fd4af51942b5283dbb89b90http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90173-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90173-2http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0013919434&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a5466b26d0a9c44554c794f1c8209cb9http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014040617&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=c363b539d3a677249c708df0b9576e14http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B113http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B112http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B98http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B59http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B65http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B111http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B110http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B109http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B108http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/#B1077/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
7/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 7
Surgery,vol.31,no.6,pp.641645,2002.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
7. G.E. CarlssonandG.Persson, Morphologic changes of themandibleafter extraction andwearing ofdentures.A longitudinalclinical,andx-raycephalometricstudycovering5years,OdontologiskRevy,vol.18,no.1,pp.2754,1967.ViewatScopus
8. A.Ashman,Postextractionridgepreservationusingasyntheticalloplast,ImplantDentistry,vol.9,no.2,pp.168176,2000.ViewatScopus
9. J.PietrokovskiandM.Massler,Alveolarridgeresorptionfollowingtoothextraction,TheJournalof ProstheticDentistry,vol.17no.1,pp.2127,1967.ViewatScopus
10. M.G.AraujoandJ.Lindhe,Dimensionalridgealterationsfollowingtoothextraction.Anexperimentalstudyinthedog,Journalof
ClinicalPeriodontology,vol.32,no.2,pp.212218,2005.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
11. G.Huynh-Ba,B. E.Pjetursson,M.Sanz et al., Analysis of the socket bonewall dimensions in the upper maxillain relation toimmediateimplantplacement,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.21,no.1,pp.3742,2010.ViewatPublisher ViewatGooglScholarViewatScopus
12. P. R. Ramakrishnan, W. L. Lin, J. Sodek, and M. I. Cho, Synthesis of noncollagenous extracellular matrix proteins durindevelopmentofmineralizednodulesbyratperiodontalligamentcellsinvitro,CalcifiedTissueInternational,vol.57,no.1,pp.5259,1995.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
13. M.I.Cho,N.Matsuda,W.L.Lin,A.Moshier,andP.R.Ramakrishnan,Invitroformationofmineralizednodulesbyperiodontaligament cells fromthe rat,Calcified TissueInternational,vol.50,no.5,pp.459467,1992. ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
14. G.G. Steiner,W. Francis, R. Burrell,M.P. Kallet, D.M. Steiner, and R.Macias, The healing socketand socket regeneration,
CompendiumofContinuingEducationinDentistry,vol.29,no.2,pp.114124,2008.
15. G.Cardaropoli, M.Arajo,R.Hayacibara, F.Sukekava, and J. Lindhe,Healing ofextractionsockets and surgicallyproducedaugmentedandnon-augmenteddefectsinthealveolarridge.Anexperimentalstudyinthedog,JournalofClinicalPeriodontologyvol.32,no.5,pp.435440,2005.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
16. L.P.Garetto, J.Chen,J.A.Parr, andW.E.Roberts,Remodelingdynamicsofbonesupportingrigidlyfixedtitaniumimplants:histomorphometric comparison in fourspecies includinghumans, Implantdentistry, vol. 4,no.4, pp. 235243, 1995. View aScopus
17. K.Johnson,Astudyofthedimensionalchangesoccurringinthemaxillafollowingtoothextraction,AustralianDentalJournal,vol14,no.4,pp.241244,1969.ViewatScopus
18. L.Schropp,L.Kostopoulos,andA.Wenzel,Bonehealingfollowingimmediateversusdelayedplacementoftitaniumimplantsintoextractionsockets:aprospectiveclinicalstudy,InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacialImplants,vol.18,no.2,pp.189199
2003.ViewatScopus
19. C.H.Hammerle,M.G.Araujo,andM.Simion,Evidence-basedknowledgeon thebiology and treatmentofextractionsockets,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.23,supplement5,pp.8082,2012.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar
20. L. Schropp, A.Wenzel, L.Kostopoulos, and T. Karring, Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-toothextraction:aclinicalandradiographic12-monthprospectivestudy,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistryvol.23,no.4,pp.313323,2003.ViewatScopus
21. W.L.Tan,T.L.T.Wong,M.C.M.Wong,andN. P.Lang,Asystematic reviewofpost-extractionalalveolarhardandsofttissudimensionalchangesinhumans,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.23,supplement5,pp.121,2012.ViewatPublisher ViewaGoogleScholar
22. A.Ashman,Ridgepreservation: importantbuzzwordsin dentistry,GeneralDentistry,vol.48,no.3,pp.304312,2000.ViewaScopus
23. M.H.Amler,Thetimesequenceoftissueregenerationinhumanextractionwounds,OralSurgery,OralMedicine,OralPathologyvol.27,no.3,pp.309318,1969.ViewatScopus
24. J.G.Mangos,Thehealingofextractionwounds:amicroscopicandridographicinvestigation,NewZeelandDentalJournal,vol.37pp.423,1941.
25. L.Trombelli,R.Farina,A.Marzola,L.Bozzi,B.Liljenberg,andJ. Lindhe,Modelingandremodelingof humanextractionsockets,JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.35,no.7,pp.630639,2008.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
26. R.S.Clafin,Healingofdisturbedandundisturbedextractionwounds,JournaloftheAmericanDentalAssociation,vol.23,pp.945959,1936.
27. J.P.WeinmannandH.Sicher,BoneandBones,2ndedition,1955.
28. M.H.Amler, P. L. Johnson, and I. Salman, Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in
http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-44949208338&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=f8b0cb29a4b3bf9b4017fcf3d093ef71http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01246.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01246.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014483772&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=452c3298f3d9589f316060346264ed2chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034188258&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e9892ec4f9d8e82264019e455ba402dfhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0141627791&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=7328e573256417aa01f145e3b011b58dhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0038749490&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=f6fbc5e559950993736a90904b89f316http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014561367&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=72fa730e7dfabc437b68c2e8e94e5f1chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0029439224&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=cec9235b469163a29b1fc7c4cff5db5dhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-18244375859&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=9270842f6559639155109ee873879ce6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00692.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00692.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026708957&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ad303a2b44f02356ddab8cbd772cfc4ahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00296778http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00296778http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0029019746&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=1fd0c137bbca5dcd943cd9c4cf87fb66http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00298997http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00298997http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949085306&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=7c24d155236c502c4dc1f31e026214a9http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-14844286171&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=1427489b7dfd4596fb14bb5d482fa09ahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014040885&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=413e1593b5a5308b4322d2d5889d3e31http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034571526&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a65796981c89b2ce18daa2dfb947e6achttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014041792&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=41c01f718042aa81141e39de759586cchttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036911143&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=633d5f81768cd38b8f91cc506ec0f345http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0292http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.02927/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
8/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 8
undisturbedextractionwounds,JournaloftheAmericanDentalAssociation,vol.61,pp.3244,1960.
29. C.I. Evian,E.S.Rosenberg,J.G.Coslet,andH.Corn,Theosteogenicactivityofboneremovedfromhealingextractionsocketsinhumans,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.53,no.2,pp.8185,1982.ViewatScopus
30. G.Cardaropoli,M. Arajo,andJ. Lindhe,Dynamicsofbonetissueformation intoothextractionsites:an experimentalstudyindogs,JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.30,no.9,pp.809818,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar
31. S.Fickl,O.Zuhr,H.Wachtel,W.Bolz,andM.Huerzeler,Tissuealterationsaftertoothextractionwithandwithoutsurgicaltraumaavolumetricstudyinthebeagledog,JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.35,no.4,pp.356363,2008. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
32. S.Fickl,O.Zuhr,H.Wachtel,W.Bolz,andM.B.Huerzeler,Hardtissuealterationsaftersocketpreservation:anexperimentalstudyinthebeagledog,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.19,no.11,pp.11111118,2008.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
33. J.Blanco,V.Nuez,L.Aracil,F.Muoz,andI.Ramos,Ridgealterationsfollowingimmediateimplantplacementinthedog:flapversusflaplesssurgery,Journal ofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.35,no.7,pp.640648,2008. ViewatPublisher View atGooglScholarViewatScopus
34. M.G.ArajoandJ.Lindhe,Ridgealterationsfollowingtoothextractionwithandwithout flapelevation:anexperimentalstudy inthedog,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.20,no.6,pp.545549,2009.ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholar ViewaScopus
35. F.Vignoletti, P.Matesanz,D.Rodrigo,E. Figuero,C.Martin, andM.Sanz, Surgicalprotocolsfor ridgepreservationaftertoothextraction.Asystematicreview,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.23,supplement5,pp.2238,2012.ViewatPublisher ViewaGoogleScholar
36. M.Caneva,D.Botticelli,L.A. Salata,S. L.S. Souza,E. Bressan,andN.P.Lang,Flapvs.flaplesssurgicalapproach atimmediatimplants: ahistomorphometric study in dogs, ClinicalOral Implants Research, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 13141319, 2010. View aPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
37. A.H.Melcher,Woundhealinginmonkey(Macacairus)mandible: effectof elevatingperiosteumonformationof subperiosteacallus,ArchivesofOralBiology,vol.16,no.4,pp.461IN19,1971.ViewatScopus
38. A.H.Melcher,Roleoftheperiosteuminrepairofwoundsoftheparietalboneoftherat,ArchivesofOralBiology,vol.14,no.9pp.1101IN23,1969.ViewatScopus
39. A.H.Melcher,Ontherepairpotentialofperiodontaltissues,Journalof Periodontology,vol.47,no.5,pp.256260,1976.ViewaScopus
40. C.H.F.HmmerleandT.Karring,Guidedboneregenerationatoralimplantsites,Periodontology2000,vol.17,no.1,pp.151175
1998.ViewatScopus
41. U.M.Wikesj,R . E.Nilvus, andK.A. Selvig, Significance ofearlyhealingeventsonperiodontal repair: areview,Journal ofPeriodontology,vol.63,no.3,pp.158165,1992.ViewatScopus
42. U.M.Wikesj,G. C.Bogle, andR. E.Nilvus, Periodontal repairin dogs: effect ofa composite graft protocol onhealing insupraalveolarperiodontaldefects,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.63,no.2,pp.107113,1992.ViewatScopus
43. J.M.Haney,K.N.Leknes,T.Lie,K. A.Selvig,andU.M.Wikesj, Cementaltearrelatedtorapidperiodontalbreakdown:acasreport,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.63,no.3,pp.220224,1992.ViewatScopus
44. V. Lekovic, E. B.Kenney, M.Weinlaender et al., Abone regenerative approach to alveolar ridgemaintenance following toothextraction.Reportof10cases,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.68,no.6,pp.563570,1997.ViewatScopus
45. M.N.Pinho,V.M. Roriz,A. B.Novaes et al., Titaniummembranes inprevention ofalveolar collapse after toothextraction,
ImplantDentistry,vol.15,no.1,pp.5361,2006.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus46. V. Lekovic,P. M. Camargo, P. R. Klokkevold et al., Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbabl
membranes,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.69,no.9,pp.10441049,1998.ViewatScopus
47. S. M. Luczyszyn, V. Papalexiou, A. B. Novaes, M. F. M. Grisi, S. L. S. Souza, and M. Taba, Acellular dermal matrix andhydroxyapatiteinpreventionofridgedeformitiesaftertoothextraction,ImplantDentistry,vol.14,no.2,pp.176184,2005.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
48. R.Neiva, G.Pagni, F.Duarte et al.,Analysis of tissue neogenesisin extraction sockets treatedwithguided bone regenerationclinical,histologic,andmicro-CTresults,TheInternationalJournalofPeriodontics&RestorativeDentistry,vol.31,no.5,pp.457469,2011.
49. J. M. Lasella, H. Greenwell, R. L.Miller et al., Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and acollagen membrancomparedtoextractionaloneforimplantsitedevelopment:aclinicalandhistologicstudyinhumans,JournalofPeriodontology,vol
http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-21344433661&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=974a5c2a85f881a59610bde03e3ac0e4http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000165082.77499.41http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000165082.77499.41http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0032160402&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=76c69068aebb98120be4482fd7fdd467http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33646853317&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=b0859ebe498138bffe214a3cd2fdf3f6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202596.18254.e1http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202596.18254.e1http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031154703&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6513966985d2846b908ff1156a724dc4http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026824658&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a4f18e8b41d69fba87df5ceff8208358http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026811848&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=54e1abd30b8c6c3f3cb3fcd989dd7217http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026826632&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ce05edfb6093b0aa9e7f52397b86e7dbhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0032081970&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=c22b9cada1c5a42119c7fd9976f2fcaehttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0016960221&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2844ff646ad7611b4120deee5beff573http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0014576164&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e26fb65f898b12512c65a11c5b49b332http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0015047015&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6136f0c67f1a17e4a89b98d83ec61474http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78349291929&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=3c9efb9aff1cbc9cbb1a3c11e1b6b7e6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01959.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01959.xhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02331.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02331.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-65649108412&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ee022ccd60406614c16724aa7afa11c3http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01703.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01703.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-44849132690&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2fc73124dd13eb138d9530d27a0b4f9ehttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01237.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01237.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-54249117728&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=de5ce81581b647f27a197114c89582cahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01575.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01575.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-40849142458&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=57cb8b5b409ab3a39da65154ce67ee6bhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01209.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01209.xhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0020096912&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=23183ea684c9c43eb0c573b19f668fe27/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
9/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 9
74,no.7,pp.990999,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
50. S.Fickl,O.Zuhr,H.Wachtel,C.F.J.Stappert,J.M.Stein,andM.B.Hrzeler,Dimensionalchangesofthealveolarridgecontouafter different socket preservation techniques,Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 906913, 2008. View aPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
51. A.G.Sclar,Preservingalveolarridgeanatomyfollowingtoothremovalinconjunctionwithimmediateimplantplacement.TheBioColtechnique,AtlasoftheOralandMaxillofacialSurgeryClinicsofNorthAmerica,vol.7,no.2,pp.3959,1999.ViewatScopus
52. C. E. Nemcovsky and V. Serfaty, Alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Report on 2consecutivecases,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.67,no.4,pp.390395,1996.ViewatScopus
53. F.Brugnami,P.R.Then,H.Moroi,andC.W.Leone,Histologicevaluationofhumanextractionsocketstreatedwithdemineralizedfreeze-driedboneallograft(DFDBA)andcellocclusivemembrane, JournalofPeriodontology,vol.67,no.8,pp.821825,1996.ViewatScopus
54. H.L.WangandY.P.Tsao,Mineralizedboneallograft-plugsocketaugmentation:rationaleandtechnique,ImplantDentistry,vol16,no.1,pp.3341,2007.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
55. Z.Artzi,H.Tal,andD.Dayan, Porous bovinebonemineralin healingof humanextractionsockets.Part 1:histomorphometricevaluationsat9months,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.71,no.6,pp.10151023,2000.ViewatScopus
56. Z.Artzi,H.Tal,andD.Dayan,Porousbovinebonemineralinhealingofhumanextractionsockets:2.Histochemicalobservationat9months,Journal of Periodontology,vol.72,no.2,pp.152159,2001. ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholar View aScopus
57. M.Arajo, E. Linder, J.Wennstrm, and J. Lindhe, The influence of Bio-Oss collagen onhealingof an extraction socket: an
experimentalstudyinthedog,International Journal ofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.28,no.2,pp.123135,2008.ViewatScopus
58. M.Arajo,E. Linder,andJ. Lindhe, Effectofaxenograftonearlyboneformationinextractionsockets:anexperimentalstudyindog,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.20,no.1,pp.16,2009.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
59. D.T.Luttikhuizen,M.C.Harmsen,andM.J.A.VanLuyn,Cellularandmoleculardynamicsintheforeignbodyreaction,TissueEngineering,vol.12,no.7,pp.19551970,2006.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
60. W.Becker,C.Clokie,L. Sennerby,M.R.Urist, andB.E.Becker,Histologicfindingsafterimplantationandevaluationofdifferengraftingmaterialsandtitaniummicroscrewsintoextractionsockets:casereports,Journalof Periodontology,vol.69,no.4,pp.414421,1998.ViewatScopus
61. H.L.WangandY.P.Tsao,Histologic evaluationofsocketaugmentationwithmineralizedhumanallograft,InternationalJournaofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.28,no.3,pp.231237,2008.ViewatScopus
62. A.Mordenfeld, M.Hallman, C.B. Johansson, and T.Albrektsson, Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsieharvested11yearsaftermaxillarysinusflooraugmentationwithdeproteinizedbovineandautogenousbone,ClinicalOralImplantResearch,vol.21,no.9,pp.961970,2010.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
63. G.Rasperini, L.Canullo,C.Dellavia,G. Pellegrini, andM.Simion,Socket grafting in theposteriormaxilla reduces theneed fosinusaugmentation,TheInternationalJournalofPeriodontics&RestorativeDentistry,vol.30,no.3,pp.265273,2010. ViewaScopus
64. E.De Santis,D. Botticelli, F. Pantani, F. P. Pereira, M.Beolchini, andN. P. Lang, Bone regeneration at implantsplaced intoextractionsocketsofmaxillaryincisorsindogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.22,no.4,pp.430437,2011.ViewatPublisheViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
65. J. P. Fiorellini, D. M. Kim, Y. Nakajima, and H. P. Weber, Osseointegration of titanium implants following guided bonregenerationusingexpandedpolytetrafluoroethylenemembraneandvariousbonefillers,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsand
RestorativeDentistry,vol.27,no.3,pp.287294,2007.ViewatScopus
66. D.Carmagnola,P.Adriaens, andT.Berglundh,Healingofhumanextractionsockets filledwithBio-Oss,ClinicalOralImplantResearch,vol.14,no.2,pp.137143,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
67. L.Molly,H.Vandromme,M.Quirynen,E.Schepers,J. L.Adams,andD.VanSteenberghe,Boneformationfollowingimplantationofbonebiomaterialsintoextractionsites,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.79,no.6,pp.11081115,2008.ViewatPublisher ViewaGoogleScholarViewatScopus
68. J.P.FiorelliniandM.L.Nevins, Localizedridgeaugmentation/preservation.Asystematicreview,AnnalsofPeriodontology,vol.8no.1,pp.321327,2003.ViewatScopus
69. M.Nevins,M.Camelo,S.DePaolietal.,Astudyofthefateofthebuccalwallofextractionsocketsofteethwithprominentroots,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.26,no.1,pp.1929,2006.ViewatScopus
http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-31944441424&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=95eca9c38582460aaaef81bcdb5e5b33http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-1442302978&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=979de092656a42a05c94bd0ab159812chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-46049111495&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e9d7e5d7998694e64063627cd8f33315http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070476http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070476http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0037822215&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=bb69f88f476b53ca596cd54049ae0adbhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140201.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140201.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34250194654&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=85e10b2924f8395e06535e4c6c4f31b3http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952520030&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6401039fa369de572ff08877747c3ffehttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02122.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77956042127&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ef6db4b9938f7db1121d5c0f88b4276chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955396545&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=31f242fad6ae796115f78744bef87260http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01939.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01939.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-46149127359&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=12fed0ac3aac9fd469a1374f5baf127dhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0032044251&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2e5c6b1661ac8ea7406b09c8aadfc9behttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33746676842&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=82a9cecf8587dbc787d3c8ec898c347ehttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.1955http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.1955http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-58149161369&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=5022b7af4d6efef82e6c0f902e7684ebhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01606.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01606.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-42249098425&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6ea67d1c742cd7ecee1743f5714b35b0http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035258433&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=688b20839774be76b713df033e9f72e9http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.152http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.152http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034201564&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2839f44ae77bf520b996ffd7cea62a43http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-34247589666&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=c92c1a959def9c0027ec5525403f1aachttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318031ece6http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318031ece6http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030202656&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=549065ac532852d2ff61a6ec9eb1c5b7http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030122043&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=4a9a7204a8a7342c64f9c41273003b1ahttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0033200449&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=0b6614e228c853230858dbdb615aacb6http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-51749095706&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=9691a011c0f6af801116576d66e3ea22http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01305.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01305.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0042924331&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e24a64da0bc88f9a5ecde81109b7fb09http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.9907/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
10/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 10
70. B.I. Simon,S.VonHagen,M.J.Deasy,M. Faldu,andD.Resnansky,Changesinalveolarboneheightandwidthfollowingridgaugmentationusingbonegraftandmembranes, JournalofPeriodontology,vol.71,no.11,pp.17741791,2000.ViewatScopus
71. G.Zubillaga,S.VonHagen,B.I.Simon,andM.J.Deasy,Changesinalveolarboneheightandwidthfollowingpost-extractionridgeaugmentation using a fixed bioabsorbable membrane and demineralized freeze-dried bone osteoinductive graft, Journal ofPeriodontology,vol.74,no.7,pp.965975,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
72. S.Fickl,O. Zuhr,H.Wachtel,M.Kebschull,andM.B.Hrzeler, Hardtissuealterationsaftersocketpreservationwith additionabuccal overbuilding: astudy in the beagledog,Journal ofClinicalPeriodontology, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 898904, 2009. View aPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
73. S.Fickl,D.Schneider,O.Zuhretal.,Dimensionalchangesoftheridgecontouraftersocketpreservationandbuccaloverbuilding:ananimalstudy,JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.36,no.5,pp.442448,2009.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
74. M.Stimmelmayer,E.P.Allen,T.E.Reichert,andG.Iglhaut,Useofacombinationepithelized-subepithelialconnectivetissuegrafforclosureandsofttissueaugmentationof an extractionsite followingridgepreservationorimplantplacement:descriptionoftechnique,TheInternationalJournalofPeriodontics&RestorativeDentistry,vol.30,no.4,pp.375381,2010.ViewatScopus
75. T.Thalmair,M.Hinze,W.Bolz,andH.Wachtel,Thehealingof freegingivalautograftsforsocket-sealsurgery:acasereport,ThEuropeanJournalofEstheticDentistry,vol.5,no.4,pp.358368,2010.ViewatScopus
76. C.J.LandsbergandN.Bichacho,Amodifiedsurgical/prostheticapproachforoptimalsingleimplantsupportedcrown.PartIthesocketsealsurgery,PracticalPeriodonticsandAestheticDentistry,vol.6,no.2,pp.1119,1994.ViewatScopus
77. M.Nevins and J. T.Mellonig, The advantages of localized ridge augmentationprior to implantplacement: astagedevent,ThInternationalJournalofPeriodontics&RestorativeDentistry,vol.14,no.2,pp.96111,1994.ViewatScopus
78. C.J. Landsberg,Socketsealsurgerycombinedwith immediateimplantplacement:anovelapproachforsingle-toothreplacement,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.17,no.2,pp.141149,1997.ViewatScopus
79. H.Tal, Autogenousmasticatorymucosal graftsin extractionsocketseal procedures:a comparisonbetweensockets graftedwithdemineralizedfreeze-driedboneanddeproteinizedbovinebonemineral,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.10,no.4,pp.289296,1999.ViewatScopus
80. W. Schulte,H. Kleineikenscheidt, K.Lindner, andR. Schareyka, TheTubingen immediate implantin clinical studies,DeutschzahnarztlicheZeitschrift,vol.33,no.5,pp.348859,1978.
81. W.Schulte,H.Kleineikenscheidt,R. Schareyka,andG.Heimke,ConceptandtestingoftheTubingenimmediateimplant,DeutschzahnarztlicheZeitschrift,vol.33,no.5,pp.319325,1978.
82. W.Schulte,H.Kleineikenscheidt,K.Lindneretal.,AnimalexperimentsonthequestionofhealingaroundtheTbingenimmediat
implant,DeutschezahnarztlicheZeitschrift,vol.33,no.5,pp.326331,1978.
83. I.Barzilay,G.N.Graser,B. Iranpour, and J.R.Natiella, Immediate implantation ofapuretitaniumimplant intoanextractionsocket:reportofapilotprocedure,TheInternationalJournalofOral&MaxillofacialImplants,vol.6,no.3,pp.277284,1991.ViewatScopus
84. I.Barzilay,G.N.Graser,B.Iranpour,andH.M.Proskin,ImmediateimplantationofpuretitaniumimplantsintoextractionsocketofMacacafascicularispartI:clinicalandradiographicassessment,InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacialImplants,vol.11no.3,pp.299310,1996.ViewatScopus
85. I.Barzilay,G.N.Graser,B. Iranpour, J.R. Natiella, andH.M.Proskin, Immediate implantationof puretitanium implants intoextractionsocketsofMacacafascicularis.PartII:histologicobservations, InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacialImplantsvol.11,no.4,pp.489497,1996.ViewatScopus
86. D.Botticelli, T. Berglundh, and J. Lindhe, Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implantplacement in extractionsites,
JournalofClinicalPeriodontology,vol.31,no.10,pp.820828,2004.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
87. M.G.Arajo, F.Sukekava, J. L.Wennstrm, and J.Lindhe, Ridge alterations following implant placementin fresh extractionsockets:anexperimentalstudyinthedog,Journalof ClinicalPeriodontology,vol.32,no.6,pp.645652,2005.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
88. M.G.Arajo, F. Sukekava, J. L.Wennstrm,and J.Lindhe, Tissuemodeling following implant placement in fresh extractionsockets,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.17,no.6,pp.615624,2006. ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholar ViewaScopus
89. M.G.Arajo,J. L.Wennstrm,and J. Lindhe,Modelingofthebuccalandlingual bonewallsof freshextractionsitesfollowingimplantinstallation,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.17,no.6,pp.606614,2006.ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
90. D.Botticelli, L. G.Persson, J. Lindhe, and T.Berglundh, Bone tissue formation adjacentto implantsplaced in fresh extraction
http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33750729237&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=e2fa1257f377a8f2e6c1a6c09625e994http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33750704585&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6e13cd373c5f38b8d74b821ab217b075http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01317.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01317.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-20344404942&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=70ebd1032f91c02bd3d1c349476df2bbhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-6344239043&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=cf0d5dcc3837d7cd3ce3505a1a54929ahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030185374&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=875eb26b092f5a1ca10fd2e0594f2b5chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030147473&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a8798bd030e5af4c0bc8b59695a02360http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0026218692&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=5f8829a912a3832ffea06dd9bab12ca9http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0033177395&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=767e3f4776ce6c43354700867cc3c6c1http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031107627&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=6849811d6d2e26b989ad24c5771075c3http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0028412676&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=19466394953eda77112abb43e217edaahttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0028403225&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ca8fcb6262868405a9067c078c97f61chttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952277882&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=9f3bba7eef50d011a3626f4b4a61f9d5http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77957273616&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a8298eade3867c99c6e92e1f0ffccf50http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-64849117985&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=178ccf328093f876e6cde3c6b7519de6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01381.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-70349148959&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=69bcd4eec948c94c05ce5270162eb78fhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01463.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01463.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0041421196&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=fb12f14d13fe4b79a68f3e1a8d4f2162http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.965http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.965http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034321819&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=5d0b7b8677576592c4bcc00d39f2b5347/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
11/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2012/151030/ 11
sockets:anexperimentalstudyindogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.17,no.4,pp.351358,2006. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
91. D.Botticelli,T.Berglundh,D.Buser,andJ.Lindhe,Thejumpingdistancerevisited:anexperimentalstudyinthedog,ClinicalOraImplantsResearch ,vol.14,no.1,pp.3542,2003.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
92. D. Botticelli,T. Berglundh, andJ. Lindhe, Resolutionof bone defects of varying dimensionand configuration inthemarginaportionoftheperi-implantbone:anexperimentalstudyinthedog, Journalof ClinicalPeriodontology,vol.31,no.4,pp.3093172004.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
93. M.Caneva,L.A.Salata, S.S.DeSouza,G.Baffone,N.P. Lang,andD.Botticelli,Influenceofimplantpositioning inextractionsocketson osseointegration:histomorphometricanalysesin dogs,
ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.21,no.1,pp.4349,2010
ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
94. M.Sanz,D.Cecchinato,J.Ferrus,E.B.Pjetursson,N.P.Lang,andJ.Lindhe,Aprospective,randomized-controlledclinicaltrialtoevaluatebone preservation using implants with different geometry placed into extraction sockets in themaxilla,Clinical OraImplantsResearch ,vol.21,no.1,pp.1321,2010.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
95. C.Tomasi,M.Sanz,D.Cecchinatoetal.,Bonedimensionalvariationsatimplantsplacedin freshextractionsockets:amultilevemultivariateanalysis,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.21,no.1,pp.3036,2010.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
96. M.Caneva,L. A. Salata,S. S.deSouza,E.Bressan,D.Botticelli, andN. P. Lang,Hardtissue formationadjacent to implants ovarioussizeandconfiguration immediatelyplaced intoextractionsockets: anexperimental study in dogs,ClinicalOral ImplantResearch,vol.21,no.9,pp.885890,2010.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
97. M. Caneva, D. Botticelli, F. Rossi, L.C. Cardoso, F. Pantani, and N.P. Lang, Influence of implants with different sizes andconfigurationsinstalledimmediatelyintoextractionsocketsonperi-implanthardandsoft tissues:anexperimentalstudy indogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.23,no.4,pp.396401,2012.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar
98. M. Caneva, D. Botticelli, L. A. Salata, S. L. Scombatti Souza, L. CarvalhoCardoso, and N. P. Lang, Collagen membranes aimmediateimplants:ahistomorphometricstudyindogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.21,no.9,pp.891897,2010.ViewaPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
99. M.Caneva,D.Botticelli,E.Stellini,S.L.S.Souza,L.A.Salata,andN.P.Lang,Magnesium-enrichedhydroxyapatiteatimmediatimplants:ahistomorphometricstudyindogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.22,no.5,pp.512517,2011.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
100. M.Caneva,D.Botticelli,F.Morelli,G.Cesaretti,M.Beolchini,andN.P. Lang,Alveolarprocesspreservationatimplantsinstalledimmediatelyintoextractionsocketsusingdeproteinizedbovinebonemineral-anexperimentalstudyindogs,ClinicalOralImplantResearch.Inpress.
101. M.Caneva,D.Botticelli,F.Pantani,G.M.Baffone,I.G. Rangel,andN.P.Lang,Deproteinizedbovinebonemineralinmarginadefectsat implants installed immediately intoextractionsockets: an experimentalstudy indogs,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch2011.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
102. M.G.Arajo,E.Linder,andJ. Lindhe,Bio-OssCollageninthebuccalgapatimmediate implants:a6-monthstudyinthedog,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.22,no.1,pp.18,2011.ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
103. C.H. F.Hmmerle,S. T.Chen,andT.G.WilsonJr,Consensusstatements and recommendedclinicalproceduresregarding thplacementofimplantsinextractionsockets,InternationalJournalofOralandMaxillofacialImplants,vol.19,pp.2628,2004.ViewatScopus
104. I.Sanz,M.Garcia-Gargallo,D.Herrera,C.Martin,E.Figuero,andM.Sanz,Surgicalprotocolsforearlyimplantplacementinpostextractionsockets:asystematicreview,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.23,supplement5,pp.6779,2012. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar
105. Z.Lin,H. F.Rios, S. L.Volk, J.V. Sugai,Q.Jin, andW.V.Giannobile, Gene expression dynamicsduring bonehealing andosseointegration,JournalofPeriodontology,vol.82,no.7,pp.10071017,2011. ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
106. G.Serino,S.Biancu,G. Iezzi,andA.Piattelli,Ridgepreservationfollowingtoothextractionusingapolylactideandpolyglycolidspongeasspacefiller:aclinicalandhistologicalstudyinhumans,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.14,no.5,pp.651658,2003ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
107. G.Serino,W.Rao,G.Iezzi,andA.Piattelli,Polylactideandpolyglycolidespongeusedinhumanextractionsockets:boneformationfollowing3monthsafteritsapplication,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch ,vol.19,no.1,pp.2631,2008.ViewatPublisher ViewaGoogleScholarViewatScopus
108. S.E.Lynch,TissueEngineering:ApplicationsinOralandMaxillofacialSurgeryandPeriodontics,2ndedition,2008.
http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-37249036000&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=9ac0da38a4fbe2305ce8ea1050c9d577http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01311.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01311.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0344441917&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=43533ae779e60982c578ce52f1983602http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00970.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79960485509&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=b8d929e7d9d3f52994526e3a697e11edhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100577http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100577http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02339.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02339.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-12244312541&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=ec278e4ff09622edd94e5006e7ca1546http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78650217933&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=80b3af17463d2ba9410254bfdab8b33bhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01920.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01920.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79955555631&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=1d684564cc086e8605795a9ca877a4f1http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02202.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02202.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79953713968&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=0091d823a4ed13ec8656cabd86c206f8http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02040.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02040.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955360940&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=a777f59c22da87692d08eda2a86efd10http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01946.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01946.xhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02310.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955351268&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=f58245591d348ce7c4becb1a09391106http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01931.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949090580&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=765096d1df0135264ed2ad0d7ae899b6http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01848.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01848.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949111386&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=1ea33936d6e42d3926f742d9ffccbdfahttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01824.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01824.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949118511&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=2f25042c56b59f7318387cdd98451212http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01842.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01842.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-2342508490&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=3cac32d210c460ed3b3fb004e9f1d090http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00502.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00502.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0038284316&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=33ebc9b98e8aa7558ca552d55f06d098http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.xhttp://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-33746358173&partnerID=K84CvKBR&rel=3.0.0&md5=77510de886f77a37c807f8ebabb339b7http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01270.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01270.x7/28/2019 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation_ Biological Basis and Treatments
12/12
25.01.2013 Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments
109. T.H.Howell, J. Fiorellini, A. Jones et al., A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge device for locaalveolarridgepreservationoraugmentation,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.17,no.2,pp.125139,1997.ViewatScopus
110. D.L. Cochran, A.A. Jones,L.C. Lilly, J. P. Fiorellini,andH.Howell,Evaluationof recombinanthumanbonemorphogenetiprotein-2 in oral applications including the use of endosseous implants: 3-year results of apilot study in humans,Journal ofPeriodontology,vol.71,no.8,pp.12411257,2000.ViewatScopus
111. J. P. Fiorellini,T.HowardHowell, D.Cochran etal., Randomized study evaluating recombinant human bone morphogenetiprotein-2forextractionsocketaugmentation,Journalof Periodontology,vol.76,no.4,pp.605613,2005. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
112. M.L.Nevins,M.Camelo,P.Schupbach,D.M.Kim,J.M.B.Camelo,andM.Nevins,Humanhistologicevaluationofmineralizedcollagenbonesubstituteandrecombinantplatelet-derivedgrowthfactor-bbtocreateboneforimplantplacementinextractionsockedefectsat4and6months:acaseseries,InternationalJournalofPeriodonticsandRestorativeDentistry,vol.29,no.2,pp.1291392009.ViewatScopus
113. D.Kaigler,G.Pagni,A.Galloro,etal.,Accelerationofhumanoralosseousregenerationusingbonerepaircells,inProceedingsofthe39thAADRAnnualMeeting,Washington,DC,USA,2010.
114. D.Kaigler,G.Pagni,C.H.Park,S.A.Tarle,R.L.Bartel,andW.V.Giannobile,Angiogenicandosteogenicpotentialofbonerepaicells forcraniofacialregeneration,TissueEngineeringA,vol.16,no.9,pp.28092820,2010.ViewatPublisher ViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
115. G.Pagni,D.Kaigler,G.Rasperini,G.Avila-Ortiz,R.Bartel,andW.V.Giannobile,Bonerepaircellsforcraniofacialregeneration,AdvancedDrugDeliveryReviews.Inpress.
116. S.T.Chen,I.B.Darby,andE.C.Reynolds,Aprospectiveclinicalstudyofnon-submergedimmediateimplants:clinicaloutcomeandestheticresults,ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.18,no.5,pp.552562,2007. ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholarViewatScopus
117. N.P. Lang,L.Pun,K.Y. Lau,K.Y.Li, andM.C.Wong, Asystematicreviewon survivaland success ratesof implantsplacedimmediatelyintofreshextractionsocketsafteratleast1year, ClinicalOralImplantsResearch,vol.23,supplement5,pp.3966,2012ViewatPublisherViewatGoogleScholar
http:/