Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Potential of Energetic Neutral Helium Atoms to Resolve Structureof the Local Interstellar Medium within 0.1 parsec
Paweł Swaczyna, Stan Grzedzielski, and Maciej Bzowski
Space Research Centre of the Polish Academy of Sciences
2014 AGU Fall MeetingSan Francisco, CA, December 16, 2014
1 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Motivation and aims
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
Helium is the second most abundant species in the Universe→ He ENA fluxes should be detectable by well designed instrument.
Expected He ENA fluxes from the heliosphere are low.The mean free path of helium atoms in the LISM is long.→ Chance to observe extraheliospheric sources
Sun is close to the edge of the Local Interstellar Cloud (within 0.1 pc).Observation of sources from such a distance is likely.
Outline:
1 Expected emission from the inner heliosheath and the IBEX Ribbon
2 Range of He ENA in the LISM and exemplary model of emission
3 Prerequisites for IMAP ENA detector
2 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Inner heliosheath signal
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
æ
æ
æ
Inner heliosheath
Dis
tan
ce
toth
en
ose:
10°
45°
90°
135°
170°
1 10 100 100010-11
10-10
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
1
10
102
Energy @keV�nD
Diff.
inte
nsity@H
cm
2s
sr
ke
V�nL-
1D
He +PUI at TS
He
EN
A
HSTOFHeliotail
Axisymmetrical model of incompressibleplasma flow (Suess and Nerney 1990),parameters reflect Voyagers results
Spherical symmetry of supersonic solarwind
Helium ENA originate from He+ PUI in theinner heliosheath
Simulated intensities agree with HSTOF(Grzedzielski et al. 2014, A&A 563, A134)
Tail-to-nose intensity ratio: 10 – 50
Sharp drop of intensity above 100 keV/n:j(1 MeV/n) = 10−6j(100 keV/n)
Expected inner heliosheath He ENA flux 100 – 1000 times smaller than observed H ENA flux
3 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Secondary ENA from the IBEX Ribbon
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02D
iff.
inte
nsity@H
cm
2s
sr
ke
V�nL-
1D
Inner heliosheath Secondary ENA Total
1 1010-3
10-2
10-1
1A: Heliolatitude: 0°
He ENA
1 1010-3
10-2
10-1
1B: Heliolatitude: 45°
He ENA
1 1010-3
10-2
10-1
1C: Heliolatitude: 70°
He ENA
Energy @keV�nD
Adapted analytical model by Möbius et al. 2012
Relevant reactions for helium included(Swaczyna et. al. 2014, ApJ 782:106)
Fast/slow supersonic solar wind (SSW) included(Sokół et al. 2013)
Geometry of the Ribbon as observed from the IBEX(Funsten et al. 2013, Schwadron et al. 2014)
Amount of He ENA from the Secondary ENAmechanism much smaller due to:
smaller probability of He2+ neutralization in the SSWlonger mean free paths for ionization of primary HeENA and second neutralization
Secondary ENA mechanism provide a signal at most ofthe order of the inner heliosheath emission
4 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Maps of expected heliospheric flux (IHS + Sec. ENA)
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
-150-120-90-60-30
03060 90120150
180
-60
-30
0
30
60
V1
V2
NoseTailA
B
CSimulated
He ENA
1 keV�n
Diff. intensity @Hcm2 s sr keV�nL-1D
10.5 20.30.2
-150-120-90-60-30
03060 90120150
180
-60
-30
0
30
60
V1
V2
NoseTailA
B
CSimulated
He ENA
2 keV�n
Diff. intensity @Hcm2 s sr keV�nL-1D
0.1 0.50.30.20.05
-150-120-90-60-30
03060 90120150
180
-60
-30
0
30
60
V1
V2
NoseTailA
B
CSimulated
He ENA
3 keV�n
Diff. intensity @Hcm2 s sr keV�nL-1D
0.10.050.030.02
-150-120-90-60-30
03060 90120150
180
-60
-30
0
30
60
V1
V2
NoseTailA
B
CSimulated
He ENA
4 keV�n
Diff. intensity @Hcm2 s sr keV�nL-1D
0.01 0.050.030.02
Dominating part of heliospheric He ENA flux could be potentially observed from the heliotail
5 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Mean free path of He ENA in the LISM
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
0.1 1 10 100 1000
1
2
5
10
20
Energy @keV�nD
Mean
free
path@1
000
AUD
ion H
cx&ion H+
cx He+
ion e-
Densities in the closest LISM:H 0.19 cm−3 He 0.015 cm−3
H+ 0.06 cm−3 He+ 0.009 cm−3
(Frisch et al. 2011)
The longest mean free path (m.f.p)(>7000 AU) for E = 0.5− 3 keV/n
Electron impact ionization makes theLISM opaque above a few tens keV/n
Sources of suprathermal ions operating in the LISM within distances comparable with the m.f.p.could produce observable He ENA fluxes
6 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
He ENA intensities from extraheliospheric sources
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
{
IMAP
d
0seLISM
source region
jENA(E) = e− d
λLISM(E)
∫ se
0e− s
λsource(E){
jHe+ (E)[σ
cxHe+H(E)nH + σ
cxHe+He(E)nHe
]+ jHe2+ (E)σ2cx
He2+He(E)nHe
}ds
The expected flux depends on:extinction in the LISM to the edge of the source region
extintion in the source region
intensities of suprathermal helium ions in the source region
distribution of the neutrals in the source region
integration over line-of-sight in the source region
Distribution of Ions and neutrals in general are not homogeneous in the source region.Thus appropriate quantities should be treated as s dependent.
7 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Exemplary model of the extraheliospheric source (1)
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
Adapted model of ENA production at the contact layer between the Local Interstellar Cloud andLocal Bubble originally proposed by Grzedzielski et al. (2010) as the source for the IBEX Ribbon
(Swaczyna et al. 2014, ApJ 782:106)
Heliosphere
Local Interstellar Cloud
Grzedzielski et al. took low H+ density (<0.03 cm−3) toextend mean free path of H ENA in the LIC.Here: H+ density in the LIC: 0.06 cm−3
Large temperature in the LB (TLB = 106 K)→ plasma completely ionized deep inside LB, densities:H+ 0.005 cm−3 and He2+ 0.0005 cm−3
Neutral atoms (H, He) evaporate from the LIC and create aboundary layer in the LB (source region for ENA)
Assumed κ-distribution in the LB with κ = 2→ high energy tail is the source for suprathermal ions
Assumed planar geometry of the interface
8 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Exemplary model of the extraheliospheric source (2)
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
1 10 10010-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
1
10
Energy @keV�nD
Diff.
inte
nsity@H
cm
2s
sr
keV�nL-
1D
2,000 AU
5,000 AU
10,000 AU
20,000 AU50,000 AU
Innerheliosheath
He ENA
Signal in the model up to 50 times larger than theheliospheric signal
Signal is strongly attenuated above a few tens of keVby electron impact ionization
Detectable from distances . 20,000 AU ≈ 0.1 pc
0 20 40 60 800.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Distance from the center @degD
Rela
tive
inte
nsity 0.5 keV
1 keV 2ke
V
5 keV
10keV20
keV
He ENA
d0 = 2,000 AU
0 20 40 60 800.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Distance from the center @degD
Rela
tive
inte
nsity
0.5keV
1keV
2keV
5keV
10keV20
keVHe ENA
d0 = 20,000 AU
9 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Perspective for He ENA observations
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
The He ENA m.f.p. against ionization in the LISM is almost constant between 0.5 – 3 keV.
→ Ratios of intensities at different energies are not affected by attenuation in the LISM.
→ Potential for studies of energy spectra and physics in the source region.
Determination of distance to the source should be also possible:
→ Differential attenuation of signal at energies with different m.f.p. could be determined if ion
spectra in the source region are known (e.g. power-law)
Combination of maps of He ENA intensities at different energies could allow tomography of
shape of the source region.
The shortest distance to the edge of the LIC is probably smaller than 0.1 pc (20,000 AU) over
large part of the sky (Redfield and Linsky 2000, 2014).
It is likely that processes operating at this edge could produce suprathermal ions.
10 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Prerequisites for IMAP ENA detector
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
Mass spectrometer should be included in the ENA detector
Energy channels should cover energies smaller than a few tens keV/n
→ Expected signal above 100 keV/n is very small thus could be hard to detect.
Sensitivity (effective cross section times field of view) of detector should be
increased at least by an order of magnitude with respect to IBEX
Better angular and energy resolution is not needed.
→ Better resolution will decrease sensitivity and make He ENA harder to detect.
11 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc
Motivation and aimsBackground of heliospheric signal
Extraheliospheric signalSummary and conclusions
Take home message
2014 AGU Fall Meeting
Talk SH21D-02
Expected signal of He ENA emission from the heliosphere is small.
The long He ENA mean free path against ionization in the LISM make theENA sources detectable at distances up to 0.1 pc.
Observation is most likely for energies . 50 kev/n.
High sensitivity ENA detector with mass spectrometer on IMAP couldmake He ENA detection possible.
12 / 12 P. Swaczyna, S. Grzedzielski, and M. Bzowski Potential of He ENA to Resolve Structure of the LISM within 0.1 pc