26
PPMI Cognitive-Behavioral Working Group PPMI Annual Meeting - May 13-14, 2015 Daniel Weintraub, MD

PPMI Cognitive-Behavioral Working Group€¦ · PPMI Cognitive-Behavioral Working Group PPMI Annual Meeting - May 13-14, 2015 Daniel Weintraub, MD

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PPMI Cognitive-Behavioral Working Group

PPMI Annual Meeting - May 13-14, 2015

Daniel Weintraub, MD

Membership Daniel Weintraub – WG Chair

Tanya Simuni – Steering Committee Shirley Lasch – IND

Chris Coffey, Chelsea Caspell-Garcia – Statistics Core Dag Aarsland Roy Alcalay Paolo Barone Melanie Braddabur David Burn Cindy Casacelli Lama Chahine William Cho Thomas Comery Autilia Cozzolino Johnna Devoto Chris Dodds Jamie Eberling Alberto Espay Stewart Factor Hubert Fernandez Regan Fong Douglas Galasko Sandeep Gupta

Keith Hawkins David Hewitt Jim Leverenz Irene Litvan Anita McCoy Susanne Ostrowitzki Bernard Ravina Alistair Reith Irene Richard Liana Rosenthal Holly Shill Andrew Siderowf John Sims Gretchen Todd Eduardo Tolosa Matt Troyer Michael Ward Michele York

Overview

• Review of assessments • Baseline manuscript from CBWG • Preliminary longitudinal results • Individuals’ work

Study Assessments

Cognitive Assessments • Global - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ----------------------------------------------------------------- • Memory - Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) • Visuospatial - Benton Judgment of Line Orientation

(JOLO) • Working memory - Letter-Number Sequencing

(LNS) • Executive - Semantic fluency (animals, fruits,

vegetables) • Attention - Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

Behavioral Assessments

• Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) • State-Trait Anxiety (STAI)

– State and trait subscales • Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive

Disorders in Parkinson's Disease (QUIP) – Screening instrument for ICDs and related

behaviors • MDS-UPDRS Part I (psychosis, apathy, etc.)

Steps for Determining Annual Cognitive Diagnosis in PPMI

1. Investigator determines presence of cognitive decline from pre-PD state based on clinical interview and knowledge of patient

2. Investigator determines presence of significant functional impairment due to cognitive deficits interfering with routine instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs)

3. Subject has neuropsychological testing at study visit 4. Categorization of normal cognition, MCI, or dementia made

centrally based on steps #1, #2 and #3

Baseline CBWG Manuscript

• 20% of PD patients screen positive for MCI and close to 10% meet cognitive test-based criteria

• Multiple NPS (e.g., depression, anxiety and apathy) more common in untreated PD patients compared with general population

• Rates of NPS associated with DRT (e.g., psychosis and ICDs) either low or similar to controls

Weintraub et al. Movement Disorders (10.1002/mds.26170).

Preliminary Longitudinal Results: Cognition and Biomarkers

Courtesy Chelsea Caspell-Garcia, MS

Cohort Size (data submitted as of 4/13/15)

Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 # Seen (%) # Seen (%) # Seen (%) # Seen (%) GROUPS: PD Subjects

423 (100%) 393 (96%) 318 (91%) 145 (87%)

Healthy Controls

196 (100%) 185 (98%) 158 (95%) 125 (93%)

TOTAL

619 (100%) 578 (97%) 476 (92%) 270 (90%)

Psychiatric and Cognitive Outcomes

Baseline DAT as Predictor of Global Cognition and Depression Over Time

Univariate Univariate Variable Estimate (95% CI) p-value Contralateral Caudate -0.251 (-0.60, 0.09) 0.1529 Ipsilateral Caudate -0.140 (-0.46, 0.18) 0.3968 Contralateral Putamen -0.241 (-0.99, 0.51) 0.5272 Ipsilateral Putamen -0.090 (-0.60, 0.42) 0.7257 Contralateral Striatum -0.166 (-0.42, 0.09) 0.2017 Ipsilateral Striatum -0.076 (-0.29, 0.14) 0.4826 Mean Caudate -0.207 (-0.55, 0.14) 0.2408 Mean Putamen -0.173 (-0.84, 0.49) 0.6093 Mean Striatum -0.250 (-0.74, 0.24) 0.3127

Depression

Analyses adjusted for age, gender, education, APOE e4 status, and PD medication use.

Cognition Univariate Univariate

Variable Estimate (95% CI) p-value Contralateral Caudate 0.303 (-0.12, 0.72) 0.1577 Ipsilateral Caudate 0.270 (-0.13, 0.67) 0.1842 Contralateral Putamen -0.303 (-1.22, 0.61) 0.5156 Ipsilateral Putamen 0.469 (-0.16, 1.10) 0.1415 Contralateral Striatum 0.132 (-0.18, 0.44) 0.4091 Ipsilateral Striatum 0.199 (-0.06, 0.46) 0.1368 Mean Caudate 0.308 (-0.12, 0.73) 0.1551 Mean Putamen 0.278 (-0.54, 1.10) 0.5046 Mean Striatum 0.378 (-0.22, 0.98) 0.2142

Baseline AD CSF Biomarkers as Predictors of Global Cognitive Decline

Univariate Univariate Variable Estimate (95% CI) p-value A-Beta 1-42 0.0017 (-0.0004, 0.0037) 0.11 t-tau -0.0008 (-0.0029, 0.0013) 0.45 p-tau 0.0008 (-0.0012, 0.0027) 0.45 t-tau/A-Beta 1-42 -0.0023 (-0.0045, -0.0002) 0.03

Analyses adjusted for age, gender, education, APOE e4 status, and PD medication use.

• Lower A-Beta 1-42 associated with lower MoCA scores (marginal). • Higher t-tau/A-Beta 1-42 associated with lower MoCA scores.

Draft Planned Analyses Baseline Change in Cognitive STATUS From Baseline Change in Individual

Cognition SCORES From Baseline

MoCA score MoCA <26 Any 2 tests >1.5 SD below mean

NEW MoCA <26 (last point)

LAST MoCA >3 point decrease from

BL

NEW any last 2 tests >1.5 SD below

mean

NEW MCI diagnosis

NEW dementia diagnosis

Cognitive Clinical Outcome N/A N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N/A Biomarker

Baseline Change BL to Year 1

CSF 1. A-syn 2. t-tau 3. ptau181 4. AB1-42 5. t-tau/AB1-42 6. ptau181/AB1-42 7. p-tau181/t-tau

CSF 1. A-syn 2. t-tau 3. ptau181 4. AB1-42 5. t-tau/AB1-42 6.ptau181/AB1-42 7. p-tau181/t-tau

Plasma 1. Urate 2. α-synuclein 3. IGF Structural MRI 1. Major ROI’s 2. Cortical thickness 3. Subcortical

Structural MRI 1. Major ROI’s 2. Cortical thickness 3. Subcortical

DTI 1. FA (anisotropy) 2. MD (diffusivity)

DTI 1. FA (anisotropy) 2. MD (diffusivity)

DAT 1. Mean striatal 2. Mean putamen 3. Mean caudate 4. Ipsi. caudate 5. Contra. caudate 6. Ipsi. putamen 7. Contra. putamen

DAT 1. Mean striatal 2. Mean putamen 3. Mean caudate 4. Ipsi. caudate 5. Contra. caudate 6. Ipsi. putamen 7. Contra. putamen

Genetics 1. APOE 2. GBA 3. LRRK 4. Synuclein (SNCA) 5. MAPT 6. COMT 7. HLA 8. KLOTHO

Individuals’ Work

Early Disease Course: Depression

de al Riva et al. Neurology 2014;83:1096-1103.

Early Disease Course: Psychosis

Psychosis (% present)

BL

12 months

24 months

Change in PD

over time

Change between groups

over time

PD 3.1% (13/423)

5.4 % (14/261)

10.4% (10/96)

11.64 (2), p=0.003

1.49 (2), 0.59 HC 0.5%

(1/195) 0%

(0/145) 2.4% (2/83)

Fischer test, p 0.076 0.003 0.038

de al Riva et al. Neurology 2014;83:1096-1103.

Variable UPDRS Part I Hallucinations and Psychosis item

PD

Subjects (N = 423)

Healthy Controls (N = 196)

Statistic

(Chi-square)

df

p-value

Negative 410 (97%) 194 (99%) 3.95

1

0.047

Any positive score 13 (3%) 1 (1%)

“The frequency of new-onset psychosis was nearly three times as high in the DRT group

compared with the untreated group.”

Early Disease Course: Global Cognition

de al Riva et al. Neurology 2014;83:1096-1103.

Impact of DRT Initiation

de al Riva et al. Neurology 2014;83:1096-1103.

Change in DAT Availability and Incident ICD Behaviors

All subjects Subjects on DRT OR P OR P Baseline DAT binding Right caudate 1.07 .82 1.12 .71 Left caudate .905 .70 .94 .84 Right putamen .77 .58 .99 .99 Left putamen .55 .18 .78 .63 Mean total striatal .82 .64 .99 .98 Change in DAT binding (baseline-year 1) Right caudate 2.75 .08 4.03 .01 Left caudate 1.58 .35 1.78 .26 Right putamen 2.37 .33 3.28 .25 Left putamen 1.66 .48 2.52 .24 Mean total striatal 4.04 .14 6.90 .04 DAT binding (post-baseline) Right caudate .66 .31 .47 .07 Left caudate .66 .31 .62 .32 Right putamen .17 .04 .06 .01 Left putamen .17 .03 .15 .07 Mean total striatal .36 .09 .25 .04

Smith et al. (unpublished data ).

Smith et al. (unpublished data). In collaboration with Julia Kraemmer and JC Corvol.

(Logistic regression model)

Genes implicating serotonin, dopamine and opioid systems. Another model implicated noradrenergic system.

CBWG Members: Published or In Progress

• Dag Aarsland and colleagues – Lebedev et al. Large-scale resting state network correlates of cognitive

impairment in Parkinson's disease and related dopaminergic deficits. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2014.

– Siepel et al. Cognitive executive impairment and dopaminergic deficits in de novo Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders, 2014.

– Pereira et al. Initial cognitive decline is associated with cortical thinning in early Parkinson disease. Neurology, 2014.

– Pereira et al. Aberrant cerebral network topology and mild cognitive impairment in early Parkinson’s disease. Human Brain Mapping, 2015.

– Skogseth et al. Associations between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and cognition in early Parkinson’s disease (submitted).

– Pereira et al. Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ1-42 levels are associated with functional network disruption in early Parkinson’s disease (submitted).

Liu et al. Neurology 2015;8:1-9.

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in SWEDDs

Sprenger et al. Movement Disorders 2015 (10.1002/mds.26204).

CPWG Members: Sampling of Ongoing Work

• Lama Chahine - Baseline sleep and daytime sleepiness symptoms as predictors of cognitive decline

• Alberto Espay - Differential effect of dopaminergic medications on depression and anxiety symptoms

• Maria Teresa Pellecchia and Paolo Barone - Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF) as biomarker for early cognitive impairment

• Roy Alcalay - CSF β-amyloid 1-42 predicting progression to cognitive impairment