Upload
muthukumara-mani
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
1/14
The Doha Development
AgendaAn UpdateWorld Bank
December 1, 2005
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
2/14
Key Messages
A successful Doha Round is very important from a
development perspective Hong Kong Ministerial December 13-18, 2005 originally
expected to agree negotiating modalities for agriculture andnon-agricultural market access (NAMA), plus progress inservices, rules, trade facilitation and developmentdimension
WTO Members now recalibrating expectations for HongKong, but maintaining the initial ambition for the Round Hong Kong an intermediary stage on the way to full
modalities; aim to agree on a range of numbers theouter parameters in the July 2004 frameworks, andcorresponding texts in the rule-making part of the
negotiations Draft Declaration issued November 26 Sights must not be lowered if Doha is to be a true
development round There is a lot of work to do before end 2006
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
3/14
Important progress has alreadybeen made
Conditional agreement on eliminationof export subsidies
Narrowing of Singapore Issues to
trade facilitation only TRIPS waiver on access to medicines
July 2004 Framework Agreement
elements on agriculture Development at the center of a trade
round
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
4/14
Outstanding issues
Key issues remain to be resolved Agriculture, in particular market access
Cotton
Developing countries, especially MICs,
on NAMA Services
Including benchmarks
Development dimension Complementary agenda on aid for
trade
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
5/14
Agricultural Market Access
Proposal Cut onhighesttariffs %
Sensitiveproducts % Tariff CapDeved/
Deving
US10/10
90 1
75/x
EU10/28
60 8 100/150
G2010/12
75 < or = 1 100/150
G1010/10
45/50* 10/15* NO
* Numbers indicative only
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
6/14
Large cuts are needed to reduce actual
trade distorting domestic support
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
EU US Japan
Overhang
Actual
79%*
47%*
93%*
$US billion
*percentages refer to degree of overhang
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
7/14
NAMA
Definition of the formula Agreement on Swiss formula, but not on coefficients
Flexibility for developing countries Some groups seek special treatment
Newly acceded, small and vulnerable Differentiation among developing countries
EU proposes the same coefficient for developed andadvanced developing countries (with some additionalflexibilities) - but this is very controversial
Participation in sectoral negotiations? E.g., jewels, sports equipment, pharmaceuticals
Treatment of unbound tariffs How to calculate the base rate for reductions?
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
8/14
Services
69 offers, plus 30 revised (EU25 counted as 1),but low quality and lack of momentum
Mandatory quantitative benchmarks forcoverage of commitments in service sectors?
Opposed by many developing countries Plurilateral negotiations
Mandatory participation benchmarks?
Overall objectives for modes
GATS rules Broad agreement to continue negotiations and
intensify efforts
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
9/14
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
10/14
Development Issues Proposals to strengthen SDT
Focus on 28 (of the 88 proposals) agreed in principle for Cancn, PLUS5 agreement-specific proposals from LDCs
Duty and quota free access for all LDC exports Resistance from countries concerned with preference erosion Benefits require flexible rules of origin
Concerns re preference erosion and net food importers Losses may be less than expected: offsetting gains; timeperiod for implementation; utilization of existing preferences;likely price rises for food
Serious problem for a few countries, who will require increasedinternational assistance aid for trade- to cope withtransitional adjustment costs
Adjustment costs should not be a reason to deny the benefitsof liberalization to the vast majority of developing countries Extended transition periods for affected products raise risk
reducing gains from the round
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
11/14
Aid for Trade
Important complement to but not substitute for an ambitious Doha Round
Integrated Framework (IF) Increased funding, plus enhanced ability to leverage
much larger bilateral and multilateral resources Including to address infrastructure constraints
Geneva-based task force of donors and LDCs working ona new governance structure, for agreement in April 2006 Contributions likely pending agreement on governance
Adjustment Diagnostics and assistance
Regional/cross-country needs Exploring need for additional mechanisms
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
12/14
Aid for Trade contd
LDC proposal
Enhanced IF; adjustment facilitymanaged by the WTO; infrastructure
fund; debt relief, swaps and buy-back
Increased focus in bilateral programs
Scope to make progress in Hong
Kong Proposals in Nov 26 draft Declaration
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
13/14
Rules
Some highlights
Debate on clarification of disciplines onanti-dumping and subsidies (including
fisheries subsidies) expected to becomemore intense in 2006
Progress on transparency procedures
concerning RTAs, but limited progresson strengthening systemic disciplines
8/2/2019 PPT Presentation by Uri
14/14
Conclusion
November 2005, WTO Members recalibrateexpectations for Hong Kong, but maintain theinitial ambition for the Round The hardest decisions of the Doha Round will now need
to be made in early 2006 End of 2006 target for completion (US TPA expiry, June
2007) There is too much at stake to lower sights on
Doha Bank will continue to contribute through
Advocacy for an ambitious, pro-development Round
Research on trade policy and reform Aid for trade, including cooperation on enhanced IF TA and CB at globaland country levels, including greater
integration of trade into country programs