[PPT]January 2011 - mentor.ieee.org · Web view... [50 KB] File Type: [.doc] Smart ... Marvell ... Recent Documents Slide 4

January 2011

Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Slide 1

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Smart Grid Update – January 2011

Date: 2011-January-10

Abstract: NIST PAP#2 StatusAustralian Smart Metering

Name Company Address Phone emailBruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane,

Santa Clara, CA, 95054+1-321-751-3988 [email protected]

January 2011


Slide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Meeting TopicsTopic Agenda

PAP2 Action required by Jan 28 Awareness Tuesday & text review Thursday

Australian Smart Metering

Action required by Feb 11 Awareness Tuesday & text review Thursday

P2030 Information onlySponsor ballot enrollment required by March 08

Tuesday only

UK Consultation Information onlyNo action required this week

Tuesday only

SGIP Information onlyNo action required this week

Tuesday only

ITU FG-Smart Information onlyNo action required this week

Tuesday only

January 2011


Slide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Smart Grid ad hoc – Recent Documents

Document * Document topic

0028-r1 January Call

1396-r3 Submission to NIST for PAP#2

1385-r1 Closing report for Nov 2010

1316-r4 Meeting document for Nov 2010

* Structure of 802.11 document titles is 11-YR-doc#-re https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents

January 2011


Slide 4

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Abstract: This work area investigates the strengths, weaknesses, capabilities, and constraints of existing and emerging standards-based physical media for wireless communications. The approach is to work with the appropriate standard development organizations (SDOs) to determine the characteristics of each technology for Smart Grid application areas and types. Results are used to assess the appropriateness of wireless communications technologies for meeting Smart Grid applications.

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless

January 2011


Slide 5

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

NIST PAP#2

Project Team • NIST Lead: David Su, [email protected]; Nada Golmie, [email protected] • EnerNex Technical Champion Lead: Joe Hughes [email protected] • CSWG Liaison: Alan Greenburg • SGAC Liaison: Skip Ashton • SDO Leads: ISA SP100, IEEE 802, IETF, TIA, ATIS, UTC

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless?sortcol=0;table=8;up=0#sorted_table

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

January 2011


Slide 6

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

NIST Timeline

Release of draft 0.6

Release of Version 1

Draft 0.5July 28, 2010

Call for Input to Section 6August 4, 2010

End of draft 0.5 review periodSeptember 15, 2010

December 3, 2010

November 4, 2010

SGIP face-to-face, ChicagoPAP 2 meeting

OpenSG meeting, MiamiTentative PAP 2 meeting

SGIP face-to-face, St LouisTentative PAP 2 meeting

September 16, 2010

End of draft 0.6 review period

September 30, 2010

October 29, 2010

January 2011


Slide 7

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

NIST Timeline (Anticipated)

Release of draft 0.6

Draft 0.5July 28, 2010

Call for Input to Section 6August 4, 2010

End of draft 0.5 review periodSeptember 15, 2010

December 3, 2010

November 4, 2010 OpenSG + PAP2 meeting, Fort Lauderdale

SGIP face-to-face, St LouisTentative PAP 2 meeting

September 16, 2010

End of draft 0.6 review period

September 30, 2010

October 29, 2010

Release of Version 1January 15, 2011

Extended edit period

Release of Version 2June/July 2011

Continuation of project to extend findings

January 2011


Slide 8

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

PAP#2 Reports was updated Oct 1• Version 0.6 released Oct 1, 2010• http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/

PAP02Wireless/NIST_Priority_Action_Plan_2_r06.pdf

• Version 1.0 released Jan 13, 2011• http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/

PAP02Objective3/NIST_PAP2_Guidelines_for_Assessing_Wireless_Standards_for_Smart_Grid_Applications_1.0.pdf

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Objective3/NIST_PAP2_Guidelines_for_Assessing_Wireless_Standards_for_Smart_Grid_Applications_1.0.pdf

January 2011


Slide 9

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

NIST PAP2 – Report Version 1

Table of ContentsREVISION

HISTORY ............................................................................................................................... V

PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................... ‐ 1 ‐

1 OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS ..................................................................................................... ‐ 3 ‐

2 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................. ‐ 4 ‐

2.1 ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................................... 4 ‐ ‐2.2 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................... 8 ‐ ‐3 SMART GRID CONCEPTUAL MODEL AND BUSINESS FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS ..................

‐ 13 ‐3.1 SMART GRID CONCEPTUAL REFERENCE DIAGRAMS ................................................................................. 13 ‐ ‐3.2 LIST OF ACTORS ............................................................................................................................... 16 ‐ ‐3.3 SMART GRID USE CASES .................................................................................................................... 18 ‐ ‐3.4 SMART GRID BUSINESS FUNCTIONAL AND VOLUMETRIC REQUIREMENTS .................................................... 20 ‐ ‐3.5 USE OF SMART GRID USER APPLICATIONS’ QUANTITATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR PAP 2 TASKS ........................ 22 ‐ ‐3.6 ADAPTATION OF SG NETWORK TF’S REQUIREMENTS TABLE DATA FOR USE IN NETWORK MODELING TOOLS .... 23 ‐ ‐3.7 SECURITY ....................................................................................................................................... 30 ‐ ‐

January 2011


Slide 10

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

NIST PAP2 – Report Version 14 WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY ......................................................................................................... ‐ 31 ‐4.1 TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTOR HEADINGS .................................................................................................. 31 ‐ ‐4.2 TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTOR DETAILS ..................................................................................................... 32 ‐ ‐4.2.1 Descriptions of Groups 1‐7 Submissions ........................................................................... ‐ 32 ‐4.2.1.1 Group 1: Link Availability ...................................................................................................... 33 ‐ ‐4.2.1.2 Group 2: Data/Media Type Supported ................................................................................... 33 ‐ ‐4.2.1.3 Group 3: Coverage Area ......................................................................................................... 33 ‐ ‐4.2.1.4 Group 4: Mobility ................................................................................................................... 34 ‐ ‐4.2.1.5 Group 5: Data Rates ............................................................................................................... 34 ‐ ‐4.2.1.6 Group 6: RF Utilization ........................................................................................................... 34 ‐ ‐4.2.1.7 Group 7: Data Frames and Packets ........................................................................................ 36 ‐ ‐4.2.2 Descriptions of Groups 8‐12 Submissions ......................................................................... ‐ 36 ‐4.2.2.1 Group 8: Link Quality Optimization ........................................................................................ 36 ‐ ‐4.2.2.2 Group 9: Radio Performance Measurement & Management ................................................ 37 ‐ ‐4.2.2.3 Group 10: Power Management.............................................................................................. 37 ‐ ‐4.2.2.4 Group 11: Connection Topologies .......................................................................................... 37 ‐ ‐4.2.2.5 Group 12: Connection Management ..................................................................................... 37 ‐ ‐4.2.3 Descriptions of Groups 13‐20 Submissions ....................................................................... ‐ 37 ‐4.2.3.1 Group 13: QoS and Traffic Prioritization ................................................................................ 38 ‐ ‐4.2.3.2 Group 14: Location Characterization ..................................................................................... 38 ‐ ‐4.2.3.3 Group 15: Security and Security Management ...................................................................... 38 ‐ ‐4.2.3.4 Group 16: Radio Environment ................................................................................................ 39 ‐ ‐4.2.3.5 Group 17: Intra technology Coexistence ............................................................................... 39 ‐ ‐ ‐4.2.3.6 Group 18: Inter technology Coexistence ............................................................................... 39 ‐ ‐ ‐4.2.3.7 Group 19: Unique Device Identification ................................................................................. 39 ‐ ‐4.2.3.8 Group 20: Technology Specification Source ........................................................................... 40 ‐ ‐4.2.4 Descriptions of Group 21 Submission ............................................................................... ‐ 40 ‐4.2.4.1 Group 21 Description ............................................................................................................. 40 ‐ ‐4.3 TECHNOLOGY SUBMISSION TITLES ....................................................................................................... 41 ‐ ‐

January 2011


Slide 11

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission


5 MODELING AND EVALUATION APPROACH .............................................................................. ‐ 41 ‐

5.1 ASSESSMENT OF WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES AGAINST SMART GRID BUSINESS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ...... 41 ‐ ‐5.1.1 Initial Screening ................................................................................................................ ‐ 42 ‐iii5.1.2 Perform Refinements to Initial Screening ......................................................................... ‐ 42 ‐5.1.2.1 Mathematical Models ............................................................................................................ 42 ‐ ‐5.1.2.2 Simulation Models ................................................................................................................. 42 ‐ ‐5.1.2.3 Testbeds ................................................................................................................................ 42 ‐ ‐5.1.2.4 Network Design ...................................................................................................................... 43 ‐ ‐5.2 MODELING FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................... 43 ‐ ‐5.2.1 Channel Propagation Models ........................................................................................... ‐ 44 ‐5.2.1.1 Generic Model ....................................................................................................................... 45 ‐ ‐5.2.1.2 Outdoor Channel Models ....................................................................................................... 46 ‐ ‐5.2.1.2.1 The Hata Model: ............................................................................................................... 46 ‐ ‐5.2.1.2.2 Modified Hata (aka COST 231 Model): ............................................................................. 47 ‐ ‐5.2.1.2.3 Erceg Model: ..................................................................................................................... 47 ‐ ‐5.2.2 Coverage and Range Analysis ........................................................................................... ‐ 50 ‐5.2.3 Physical Layer Model ........................................................................................................ ‐ 53 ‐5.2.4 MAC Sublayer Model ........................................................................................................ ‐ 53 ‐5.2.5 Multilink Model ................................................................................................................. ‐ 55 ‐

January 2011


Slide 12

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission


6 FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING PERFORMANCE ...................................................... ‐ 56 ‐

6.1 PERFORMANCE METRICS AND USER APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................ 57 ‐ ‐6.2 THE COVERAGE CAPACITY TRADEOFF ................................................................................................... 57 ‐ ‐ ‐6.3 EXTENDING COVERAGE WITH MULTI HOP COMMUNICATIONS .................................................................. 61 ‐ ‐ ‐6.4 THE EFFECT OF THE WIRELESS LINK ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................. 62 ‐ ‐6.5 THE EFFECT OF INTERFERENCE ............................................................................................................ 64 ‐ ‐7

CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................ ‐ 66 ‐

8 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... ‐ 68 ‐

January 2011


Slide 13

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission


9 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... ‐ 68 ‐

ANNEX A IEEE 802.11 ............................................................................................................... ‐ 69 ‐

A.1 LINK TRAFFIC MODEL ................................................................................................................... 69 ‐ ‐A.2 PHYSICAL LAYER MODEL ............................................................................................................... 69 ‐ ‐A.3 MAC LAYER MODEL .................................................................................................................... 69 ‐ ‐A.4 MULTILINK MODEL ...................................................................................................................... 70 ‐ ‐A.5 PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE NUMERICAL EXAMPLES .................................................. 70 ‐ ‐A.6 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 72 ‐ ‐ANNEX B 3GPP LONG TERM EVOLUTION

(LTE) .......................................................................... ‐ 74 ‐B.1 MODELING APPROACH AND ASSUMPTIONS ...................................................................................... 74 ‐ ‐B.2 CHANNEL PROPAGATION MODEL ................................................................................................... 76 ‐ ‐B.3 COVERAGE ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 76 ‐ ‐B.4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 77 ‐ ‐B.4.1 Sector Capacity ................................................................................................................. ‐ 77

‐B.4.2 Available Throughput per Smart Meter ............................................................................ ‐ 79 ‐B.5 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 81 ‐ ‐

January 2011


Slide 14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission


ANNEX C 3GPP HIGH SPEED PACKET ACCESS (HSPA) ................................................................. ‐ 82 ‐

C.1 MODELING APPROACH AND ASSUMPTIONS ........................................................................................... 82 ‐ ‐C.2 ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................................... 83 ‐ ‐C.3 CAPACITY LIMITED AND COVERAGE LIMITED SCENARIOS ........................................................................... 84 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐C.3.1 Scenario 1: Capacity‐limited system ................................................................................. ‐ 84 ‐C.3.2 Scenario 2: Coverage‐limited system ................................................................................ ‐ 85 ‐ANNEX D CDMA2000 1X AND HIGH RATE PACKET DATA

(HRPD) ............................................... ‐ 86 ‐ivD.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 86 ‐ ‐D.2 SYSTEM MODEL .......................................................................................................................... 86 ‐ ‐D.3 TRAFFIC BETWEEN DAP AND AMI HEAD END .................................................................................... 88 ‐ ‐D.4 NUMBER OF METERS IN A CDMA2000 1X OR HRPD SECTOR ............................................................ 96 ‐ ‐D.5 CDMA2000 1X AND HRPD SYSTEM THROUGHPUT .......................................................................... 96 ‐ ‐D.6 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 97 ‐ ‐D.7 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 97 ‐ ‐ANNEX E IEEE 802.16/WIMAX

NETWORK ..................................................................................... ‐ 99 ‐E.1 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 104 ‐ ‐

January 2011


Slide 15

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

PAP#2 Report - Voting/Response guidelines

• Vote response established as Friday Jan 28.• Only yes/no vote expected.• Comments can be supplied if desired but there is no

definitive or immediate plan to respond. Comments received will be archived for consideration during preparation of Version 2 report.

• Lack of response is deemed to be acceptance.

January 2011


Slide 16

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Recommendation

• Establish awareness of Report Revision 1 on Tuesday• Request members review contents between Tues & Thurs• Identify volunteers willing to prepare submission• Return on Thursday with suggestions and voting position• Thursday, review procedure to submit individual votes for

those on the mailing list• Review procedure to submit official 802 vote

• Initial Proposal: Based upon current document and expected project continuation, best option is to vote yes, supply comments on version 1 where needed, continue to refine in Version 2

January 2011


Slide 17

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

• Australia has issued a call for candidates for their Smart Metering HAN

• Responses from 802 should be provided– Probably best from individual WG, e.g 802.11, 802.11

– http://share.aemo.com.au/smartmetering/default.aspx

http://share.aemo.com.au/smartmetering/default.aspx

January 2011


Slide 18

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Australian HAN RFI• Request for information– home area network (HAN) interface standard• The NSSC is required under its terms of reference to provide advice to

the Ministerial Council on Energy's (MCE's) Standing Committee of Officials (SCO) on an open standard to support the provision of a home area network (HAN) for customers using the smart metering infrastructure.The NSSC has issued a request for information (RFI) to standard organisations to provide information on the capabilities of their HAN standard to meet the minimum functionality requirements for a HAN.The objectives of the RFI are to confirm that:

– the HAN minimum functionality requirements (section 7.9 of the Smart Metering Infastructure Minimum Functionality Specification, version 1.1) are clearly understood and unambiguously stated

– one or more standards are capable of meeting the minimum functionality requirements for a HAN interface

http://share.aemo.com.au/smartmetering/Pages/BRWG.aspx



January 2011


Slide 19

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Australian HAN RFI

• The schedule for the RFI is as follows:

• 20 December 2010 Issue the RFI to standards organisations

• 21 January 2011 Standards organisations to register their participation via email

• 31 January 2011 Closing date for questions

• 11 February 2011 Submissions due date

• 14 to 25 February 2011 Preparation of initial evaluation and first draft of review to be sent to the BRWG

• 28 February 2011 Issue RFI draft evaluation to the BRWG

• 8-9 March 2011 First BRWG workshop review

• 10-18 March 2011 BRWG's HAN Technical Group work (as required)

• 5-6 April 2011Final BRWG workshop review

• 12 April 2011 Submission of the RFI report and Smart Metering Infrastructure Functionality Specification Change Control to the NSSC

• 20 April 2011 NSSC meeting

• May 2011 Issue HAN interface standard report to the MCE's SCO




January 2011


Slide 20

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Proposed Project Plan• 802.11 submitted notification of intent to respond.• Use Jan 12 call to raise awareness • Use Tuesday Smart Grid to

– Coordinate with 802.15– Determine if there are any questions– Identify author volunteers – prepare initial responses

• Return on Thursday to review contributions• Use reflector and subsequent calls to finalize responses

prior to Friday Feb 11 deadline• Possible Wed call slots: Jan 19, Jan 26, Feb 2, Feb 9

January 2011


Slide 21

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Recommendation

• Establish awareness of Report Revision 1 on Tuesday• Request members review contents between Tues & Thurs• Identify volunteers willing to prepare submission• Return on Thursday with suggestions and voting position• Thursday, review procedure to submit individual votes for

those on the mailing list• Review procedure to submit official 802 vote

• Initial Proposal: Based upon current document and expected project continuation, best option is to vote yes, supply comments on version 1 where needed, continue to refine in Version 2

January 2011


Slide 22

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

SGIP Catalog of StandardsThe catalog is a compendium of standards and practices considered

to be appropriate for the development and deployment of a robust and interoperable Smart Grid.

The catalog may contain multiple entries that may accomplish the goals and are functionality equivalent.

The SGIP as a part of its work program is defining a testing and certification program that may be applied to the standards listed in the catalog and that, if applied, will substantiate that implementations claiming compliance with the respective standards are also interoperable.

Where test profiles have been defined for a particular standard this will be indicated in the catalog entry.

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIPCatalogOfStandards

Initial document under review by SGIP board.

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIP


January 2011


Slide 23

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

• Smart Grid Standards Information• Version 1.8 • Thursday, November 18, 2010

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/SGIPCatalogOfStandards/SmartGridStandardsInformationTemplate.docx

January 2011


Slide 24

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

NIST PAPZZ – AMI Security Subgroup• Abstract • This priority action plan will lead to development of a standardized of a set of advanced

metering infrastructure (AMI) security requirements by a formally recognized Standards Development Organization (SDO) or a selected Standards Setting Organization (SSO). In performing each of its tasks, members of this priority action plan will liaison with the NIST CSWG Testing and Certification Subgroup to ensure standardized requirements facilitate the goals and objectives for testing and certification.

• To ensure the result does not become quickly obsolete and avoid inhibiting market creativity, members of this priority action plan will endeavor to find a sufficiently detailed level of specificity to make controls actionable such as specifying criteria for selection of mechanisms, protocols, and techniques; however the desired standard shall avoid prescribing sub-system design or identifying specific products or vendor names. For example, specifying criteria for identification of acceptable encryption algorithms and key sizes is appropriate, as is delineating requirements for handling of key material within a device; however dictating chip layout or code structure is below the level of specificity appropriate for this activity.

• Members of this priority action plan shall also ensure documentation developed extends the architecture and view presented in the NIST Interagency Report 7628 (“NISTIR”). Members of this priority action plan shall communicate any and all gaps between source documentation and the NISTIR identified during the development process to the relevant parent organization.

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/AMISecurityRequirements

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/CSWG

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/AMISecurityRequirements

January 2011


Slide 25

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

Results of Dallas Discussions• Package to NIST• https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-1396-02-0000-smart-grid-summary-input-to-pap-2-rep

ort-nov-2010.ppt

• The intent of the Section 4 comments was to improve the technical precision of the document and provide a better basis for evaluation and comparison of wireless technologies that might be used in the Smart Grid.

• However, the IEEE 802 Smart Grid committee recognized that addition of new or revised definitions or insertion of additional rows, after receiving the technology characteristics populating the V5 matrix columns, would cause some concern for NIST and the SDO respondents.

• The recommended solutions are as follow:• Create an updated matrix with a new designation (V6-proposed was the chosen designation)• Retain the previous (V5) matrix to ensure that the matrix rows and columns are archived in the

form supplied • Add disclaimers to the V6-proposed matrix indicating that some blank or omitted responses could

indicate questions or clarifications which were added to this matrix after the responses were received from the particular SDO who supplied input to the original matrix.

• The recommended disclaimers are included in this document.• The recommended definition additions for Section 2.2 are included in this document. • The recommended matrix (V6-proposed) is included in this document.• It is recommended that the revised matrix be used as the basis for comparison going forward and

that SDOs could be encouraged by NIST to update their supplied information.

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-1396-02-0000-smart-grid-summary-input-to-pap-2-report-nov-2010.ppt

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-1396-02-0000-smart-grid-summary-input-to-pap-2-report-nov-2010.ppt

January 2011


Slide 26

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

NIST ResponseThank you for the input. I think that Matrix V6 still needs more work to correctly point to and use the new notes.1)In the version_history sheet, Missing entry that includes what was done to create this version V6 (or draft 16m?).2)In the Characteristics sheet Group 7 has nothing to do with Note B. Might be Note AGroup 11 has nothing to do with Note A, but rather NOTEs B and C NOTE C should be on Group 11 item d.The terms in Note B do not match those in e, f,g, and g (or what should be h) Alignment is required to avoid confusion.Since the new items appear to be further clarifications on mesh, then perhaps they should be indicated that way such as

d:mesh; d1 single-hop; d2multi-hop; d3 ; d4. Do these apply to all wireless technologies or just to IEEE 802 wireless technologies?

“It is recommended that the revised matrix be used as the basis for comparison going forward and that SDOs could be

encouraged by NIST to update their supplied information .”The comment here is to drop the word " comparison" from the last sentence since PAP#2 is about evaluating whether a

wireless technology satisfies the requirements of the smart grid.

David Cypher

January 2011


Slide 27

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

P2030

• 17-JAN-2011 17:32:44 ET• When completed, P2030 will provide guidelines for

smart grid interoperability. It will provide an knowldege base addressing terminology, charateristics, functional performance and evaluation criteria, and the application of engineering principles for smart grid interoperability of the electric power system with end-use applications and loads. It will also discuss alternate approaches to good practices for the smart grid.

•

January 2011


Slide 28

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

P2030

• IEEE P2030™/D.4.0 2 Draft Guide for Smart Grid 3 Interoperability of Energy 4 Technology and Information 5 Technology Operation With the 6 Electric Power System (EPS), and 7 End-Use Applications and Loads

January 2011


Slide 29

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

P2030

• IEEE P2030 Working Group Meeting• February 22-23, 2011 • IEEE P2030.1 • February 24, 2011 • Draft Agenda (1/13/11) • New Orleans, Louisiana• Agenda Summary: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 – P2030 WG Meeting: 8:30 a.m. –

5:00 p.m. Wednesday, February 23, 2011 – P2030 WG Meeting: 8:30

a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Thursday, February 24, 2011 – P2030.2 WG Meeting: 8:30 a.m.

– 5:00 p.m.

January 2011


Slide 30

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

P2030IMPORTANT! To participate, you must have access to myProject through an IEEE Web Account.

If you would like to participate in IEEE Standards Sponsor Ballot P2030you must enroll as a member of the ballot group by 08-Mar-2011, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.

Title: Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and Information Technology Operation With the Electric Power System (EPS), and End-Use Applications and Loads

***** IEEE STANDARD DOCUMENT INFORMATION *****The IEEE-SASB Coordinating Committees Society/Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and Information Technology Operation With the Electric Power System (EPS), and End-Use Applications and Loads invites you to participate in the New Sponsor Ballot for:P2030Title: Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and Information Technology Operation With the Electric Power System (EPS), and End-Use Applications and LoadsScope: This document provides guidelines for smart grid interoperability. This guide provides a knowledge base addressing terminology, characteristics, functional performance and evaluation criteria, and the application of engineering principles for smart grid interoperability of the electric power system with end use applications and loads. The guide discusses alternate approaches to good practices for the smart grid. Purpose: This standard provides guidelines in understanding and defining smart grid interoperability of the electric power system with end-use applications and loads. Integration of energy technology and information and communications technology is necessary to achieve seamless operation for electric generation, delivery, and end-use benefits to permit two way power flow with communication and control. Interconnection and intra-facing frameworks and strategies with design definitions are addressed in this standard, providing guidance in expanding the current knowledge base. This expanded knowledge base is needed as a key element in grid architectural designs and operation to promote a more reliable and flexible electric power system.

***** MESSAGE FROM THE WORKING GROUP CHAIR *****

Please feel free to forward this invitation to other interested stakeholders. Further background information on P2030 may be found at http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc21/2030/2030_index.html and further IEEE standards information at http://standards.ieee.org/develop/

January 2011


Slide 31

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

UK Smart Metering

http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/consultations/consultations.aspx

Smart Metering Implementation Programme: prospectusThis page lists formal written consultations that have closed and that await publication of the Government’s response.

We aim to provide a summary of public responses to consultation within three months of the closing date.

http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/consultations/consultations.aspx

January 2011


Slide 32

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

UK Smart Metering Consultation

• Still listed as closed – awaiting Government response• (1 of 21 consultations in similar state)

January 2011


Slide 33

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

UK Smart Metering - Introduction• Reference Number: 10D/732

Open Date: 2010-07-27Close Date:

• On 27 July 2010, the Government with Ofgem published a Prospectus containing proposals for the delivery of electricity and gas smart metering in Great Britain. This covers both domestic households and small and medium non-domestic sites.

• The Prospectus document, which represents the joint views of the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (GEMA), sets out proposals for and asks for views on how smart metering will be delivered, including on issues relating to:

– the minimum requirements for meters and displays – the establishment of central communications and data services – data privacy and security issues – the regulatory and commercial framework – the approach to small and medium sites in the non-domestic sector – consumer protection – the approach to rollout and – the implementation strategy

http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/consultations/smart_mtr_imp/smart_mtr_imp.aspx


January 2011


Slide 34

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

UK Consultation documents

• Consultation documents• Smart Metering implementation programme

: prospectus - letter to consultees Size: [50 KB] File Type: [.doc]• Smart Metering implementation programme: prospectus

document Size: [786 KB] File Type: [.pdf]


http://www.decc.gov.uk/Media/viewfile.ashx?FilePath=Consultations/smart-meter-imp-prospectus/219-smart-metering-letter-consultees.doc&filetype=4&minwidth=true





January 2011


Slide 35

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

NIST SGIP Meetings- 2011Event Date Time Location

SGIP Plenary Jan 21 1-3 pm ET Telecon

SGIP Plenary Mar 29-31 All day Nashville, TNor telecon

SGIP Board Mar 29 8am - noon Nashville, TNor telecon

SGIP Board May 12 1-4 pm ET Telecon

SGIP Plenary May 26 1-3 pm ET Telecon

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIP#SGIP_Upcoming_Meetings_Events

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIP#SGIP_Upcoming_Meetings_Events

3636

CATALOG OF STANDARDS (STATUS OF WORK IN CATALOG OF STANDARDS (STATUS OF WORK IN PROGRESS)PROGRESS)

Initial Document under review by the SGIP board

3737

• Process– NIST Framework and Roadmap for SG Interoperability v1.0 identifies many standards to consider– Additional standards can be identified to the SGIP Administrator by any SGIP member for potential

inclusion in catalog– Relevance and importance evaluated by appropriate SGIP working group (e.g. DEWG, PAP, etc) and

consensus developed– 75% approval by SGIP membership required prior to SGIPGB approval for inclusion in the catalog– Standards included in the catalog may be deprecated from further use to changes in technology or

needs by following the same process.

• Catalog Structure– Entries in catalog to be structured based on application domain defined in the Framework and

further classified by GWAC stack

• Relationship to NIST and FERC lists– Standards Catalog strives for accurate characterization and relevance to the smart grid community,

and avoids recommendation– Standards Catalog expected to be a larger compilation which can inform NIST and FERC in their

decision processes

CATALOG OF STANDARDS: PROCESS & CATALOG OF STANDARDS: PROCESS & STRUCTURESTRUCTURE

3838

• SGIP Catalog of Standards • The catalog is a compendium of standards and practices considered to be

appropriate for the development and deployment of a robust and interoperable Smart Grid. The catalog may contain multiple entries that may accomplish the goals and are functionality equivalent; similarly a single standards entry may contain optional elements that need not be implemented by all implementations. In general, compliance with a standard does not guarantee interoperability due to the above reasons or due to vagueness or under-specification in the base document.

• The SGIP as a part of its work program is defining a testing and certification program that may be applied to the standards listed in the catalog and that, if applied, will substantiate that implementations claiming compliance with the respective standards are also interoperable. Where test profiles have been defined for a particular standard this will be indicated in the catalog entry.




January 2011


Slide 39

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

ITU FG Smart• ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Grid (FG Smart)• Started May 2010• The Terms of Reference of the Focus Group are available

here.• The Focus Group will,

– identify potential impacts on standards development – investigate future ITU-T study items and related actions – familiarize ITU-T and standardization communities with emerging

attributes of smart grid – encourage collaboration between ITU-T and smart grid communities

• The Focus Group will collaborate with worldwide smart grid communities (e.g., research institutes, forums, academia) including other SDOs and consortia.

http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/smart/Pages/Default.aspx

http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/smart/Pages/tor.aspx


January 2011


Slide 40

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

ITU FG SmartFourth meeting

Chicago, USA, 29 November – 3 December 2010 • Registration form • Meeting Announcement • Meeting documents

Deadline for Contributions: 25 November 2010

Fifth meetingYokohama, Japan, 10-14 January 2011

• Registration form • Meeting Announcement • Meeting documents


http://www.itu.int/cgi-bin/htsh/edrs/ITU-T/studygroup/edrs.registration.form?_eventid=3000196

http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/48/01/T48010000050001MSWE.doc

http://ifatemp.itu.int/t/fg/smart/docs/

http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/smart/Documents/2011-01-10/fgsmart-5fth-meet-announce.doc


http://ifatemp.itu.int/t/fg/smart/docs/1101-yok/


January 2011


Slide 41

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

FG ManagementChairman: Les Brown (Lantiq, Germany) Vice-Chairman: Li Haihua (MIIT, China)

Vice-Chairman: Hyung-Soo (Hans) Kim (Korea Telecom, Korea)

Vice-Chairman: Yoshito Sakurai (Hitachi, Japan) Vice-Chairman: David Su (NIST/USA)


January 2011


Slide 42

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

ITU FG Smart

FG Management• Chairman: Les Brown (Lantiq, Germany) • Vice-Chairman: Li Haihua (MIIT, China) • Vice-Chairman: Hyung-Soo (Hans) Kim (Korea

Telecom, Korea) • Vice-Chairman: Yoshito Sakurai (Hitachi, Japan) • Vice-Chairman: David Su (NIST/USA)

January 2011


Slide 43

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

ITU FG Smart• ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Grid (FG Smart)• Started May 2010• The Terms of Reference of the Focus Group are available

here.• The Focus Group will,

– identify potential impacts on standards development – investigate future ITU-T study items and related actions – familiarize ITU-T and standardization communities with emerging

attributes of smart grid – encourage collaboration between ITU-T and smart grid communities

• The Focus Group will collaborate with worldwide smart grid communities (e.g., research institutes, forums, academia) including other SDOs and consortia.


http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/smart/Pages/tor.aspx


January 2011


Slide 44

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

ITU FG SmartFourth meeting

Chicago, USA, 29 November – 3 December 2010 • Registration form • Meeting Announcement • Meeting documents

Deadline for Contributions: 25 November 2010

Fifth meetingYokohama, Japan, 10-14 January 2011

• Registration form • Meeting Announcement • Meeting documents


http://www.itu.int/cgi-bin/htsh/edrs/ITU-T/studygroup/edrs.registration.form?_eventid=3000196

http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/48/01/T48010000050001MSWE.doc

http://ifatemp.itu.int/t/fg/smart/docs/



http://ifatemp.itu.int/t/fg/smart/docs/1101-yok/


January 2011


Slide 45

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r0

Submission

FG –Smart Structure

• Writing a Document• Working Groups• 1 – Uses Cases• 2 – Requirements• 3 – Architecture