Measurement of Fabric in Cohesive

Soils

Direct and Indirect Methods

Direct Methods

-Optical microscope→ direct observation of macrostructural features basically.

-Electron microscope → direct observation of microstructural features and macrostructural features.

-X-ray diffraction → orientation of clay particles, groups of parallel clay plates produce stronger diffraction than randomly oriented plates.

-Pore size distribution

Indirect Methods

Acoustical velocity → particle arrangement influences velocity of sound waves.

Dielectric dispersion and electrical conductivity Thermal conductivity Magnetic susceptibility Mechanical properties- Strength- Modulus- Permeability- Compressibility- Shrinkage-swell.

Determination of Pore size distribution → forced intrusion of nonwetting fluidNonwetting fluid means “fluid to solid contact angle >90°.

Contact angle of mercury on soil is 140°.

d= -4ד Cosθ/P (Washburn equation)

where:d: diameter of pore intrudedsurface tension of the intruding fluid : דθ : contact angleP: applied pressure

The total volume of mercury intruded at each pressure,

gives the total volume of pores with an equivalent diameter larger than that corresponding to that pressure.

For mercury 4.84 = ד x10-4 N/mm at 25°C

θ = 130-140 °

Sample preparation of fabric analysis

You have to dry the specimen for fabric studies in general.

Drying techniques are:1. Air drying2. Oven drying3. Freeze drying4. Critical point drying

1. Air drying May be suitable for stiff soils, partly saturated

soils and others that do not show significant shrinkage.

2. Oven dryingSame as air drying. For soft samples at high

water content, it is better than air drying.

3. Freeze drying

By liquid nitrogen, sudden freezing crystalline ice will not deform below -130 °C.

Then sublimation of the frozen water is carried out at temperature betwen -50 and -100 °C.

4. Critical point dryingRaise the temperature and pressure of the sample

above the critical values. For water 374 °C and 22.5 MPa.

In the critical range the liquid and vapour phases are indistinguisable

and the pore water may be distilled away without the presence of air water interfaces that lead to shrinkage.

Soil behavior

Factors affecting the engineering properties:

a.Compositional factorsb.Environmental factors

a. Compositional factors:

1. Type of minerals2. Amount of each mineral3. Type of absorbed cations4. Shape and size distribution of particles5. Pore water composition

They can be studied using disturbed samples.

b. Environmental factors:

1. Water content2. Density3. Confining pressure4. Temperature5. Fabric6. Availability of water

They are studied using undisturbed samples or by insitu measurements.

No quantitative prediction of soil behavior completely in terms of compositional or environmental factors.

Qualitative prediction.

To study compositional-property relationships there are 2 procedures which can be

followed:

1. Natural soils are used, the composition and engineering properties are determined.

2. Synthetic soils of known composition are used and engineering properties are determined.

The Dominating Influence of Clay Phase:

In general, as clay content ↑ plasticity ↑ volume change potential ↑ compressibility ↑

permeability ↓ true cohesion ↑ true angle of internal friction ↓.

Different clay minerals has different engineering properties.

Within anyone group of clay minerals the range may also be great, because of:

1. Particle size2. Degree of crystallinity3. Type of absorbed cations4. Type and amount of free electrolyte in the pore water.

In general, the importance of these factors increases in the order:

Kaolinite →hydrous mica (illite) → Smectite

Particle size and shapeSize increases in order:Montmorillonite →Illite → Kaolinite 0.1 µm → 0.1-0.2 µm → 0.2-2.0 µm

Shape: for clays commonly platy (halloysite as tube)

Kaolinite → relatively large, thick and stiff.

Smectite → small, very thin and filmy.

Illite → in between. They are terraced and thin at the edges.

Hydraulic conductivity (permeability)

Factors influencing coefficient of permeability:

- Mineralogical composition

- Particle size and its distribution

- Void ratio

- Fabric (pore size distribution)

- Pore fluid characteristics.

Over the normal range of water contents (PL & LL) k< 1x10-5 cm/sec and may

range to values less than 1x10-10 cm/sec for some monovalent smectite minerals.

Usual range for natural clay soils: 1x10-6 _ 1x10-8 cm/sec.

For clay minerals at the same water content k, smectite<illite<kaolinite

Shear strength: ד= c+σtanΦQuartz> Kaolinite >Illite >Montmorillonite

Ranges in a given mineral type are due to:-Adsorbed cation type; -pH,-Fabric-Overconsolidation ratio (OCR)

OCR= preconsolidation pressure/present effective stress.

Compressibility

Montmorillonite > Illite > Kaolinite

Type of minerals Cc Cv (cm2/sec)x10-4

Kaolinite 0.19-0.28 12-90Illite 0.50-1.10 0.3-2.4Montmorillonite 1.00-2.60 0.06-0.3

Effect of organic matterAs organic matter ↑ plasticity ↑ volume change

potential ↑ compressibility ↑ permeability ↓ strength ↓.

As organic matter ↑ LL ↑ PL ↑ in such a manner that PI ↑.

Effect of organic matter on compaction and strength:As organic matter ↑ ρd(max) ↓ O.W.C ↑ Unconfined

compressive strength qu ↓.

Activity Both type and amount of clay in a soil

influence the properties and Atterberg limits reflect both of these factors.

Skempton 1953 defined activity to separate these factors.

Activity= PI/% Clay fraction (% smaller than 2 µm)

MineralsActivitySmectite 1.0-7.0Illite 0.5-1.0Kaolinite 0.35-0.5Halloysite (2H2O) 0.5 (Metahalloysite)

Halloysite (4H2O) 0.1(hydrated halloysite)

Attapulgite 0.5-1.2Allophane 0.5-1.2

As Activity increases, clay fraction has more influence on the properties.

Seed, Woodward, and Lundgren (1964)

Activity= PI/c-n

n=5 for natural soilsn= 10 for artificial soils

Influence of exchangable cations and pHThe influence of cations on properties increases with

increasing activity of the clay.

Exchangable cations:Size and valence are important influencing double layer thickness.

Na-Li montmorillonite → unrestricted interlayer swelling

Di or tri-valent montmorillonite → up to 18A° swelling.

Non-expansive clays

Monovalent cations (Na, Li) → deflocculationDi-tri-valent cations → flocculation

As valency ↓ double layer thickness ↑ stability ↓

pH is the most important in kaolinite from fabric point of view.

Repulsion is very sensitive to pH.

Shrinkage and swelling (volume change character)

Considering clay mineral structures montmorillonite and vermiculate (in general smectite) have larger volume change potential than kaolinites and hydrous mica (illite).

To identify high volume change soils, parameters which are related to clay mineral composition are determined.

These are: shrinhage limitplasticity indexactivity% < 2 µm size.

See, Woodward and Lundgren, 1962

The standard for comparison was the expansion of laterally confined specimens, prepared at optimum water content using standard AASHO compactive effort and allowed to swell under a surcharge of 1 psi. They found an excellent correlation:

S= 3.6X10-5AC3.44

S: Percent swellA= ActivityC= Percent clay size (< 2µm)

See, Woodward and Lundgren on natural soils:

S= 2.16X10-3(PI)2.44

Ranganatan and Satyanarayana, 1965 black cotton soil of India

Swell activity = SA= SI/C SI: Shrinkage index

SI: LL-SL

S= 4.13X10-5(SI)2.67

Viscoelastic Behavior

Time dependent deformations and stress variations as indicated by secondary compression, creep and shear relaxation are very much dependent on compositional factors.

In general, organic soils and highly plastic clays show stronger viscoelastic behavior.