PR - Shear Wall Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    1/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    1

    Shear wall structures

    1. Introduction

    Shear walls are often continuous down to based of building to forma vertical cantilever

    Shear walls behave predominately in bending instead of shear(in spite of its name)

    The floor slab usually does not have large enough out-of-planestiffness to make the walls deform as a group. As a result, each

    wall bends individually with its own neutral axis.

    Examples of shear walls: lift shaft, stairwell, structural wallpartition

    Commonly suited for buildings up to about 35 stories

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    2/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    2

    A simple problem: Single wall

    The wall is modeled as a cantilever fixed at its base, as shown in

    Figure 1.

    The governing differential equation is the familiar one from beambending theory:

    EI

    xqxy

    )()(

    )4( = (1)

    Figure 1

    QUIZ:Say whether each of the following is assumed in equation (1).

    1)Linear stress-strain relationship

    2)Elastic material

    3)Plane-section remains plane in bending

    4)Small deformation

    EXERCISE:

    Derive (1) from scratch.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    3/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    3

    To make things simple, lets solve this DE for uniformly distributed

    load, i.e., =)(xq constant not dependent on x .

    To do that, we need to integrate (1) four times (why?). This will result

    in 4 integration constants, which can be determined by requiring )(xy

    to satisfy the boundary conditions of a cantilever:

    a) 0)0( =y

    b) 0)0(' =y

    c) 0)()2( =Hy

    d) 0)()3( =Hy

    QUIZ:What do the boundary conditions a)-d) mean?

    The resulting solution for )(xy is

    1 2222 32222 45Hx

    H

    x

    H

    x

    H

    x

    EI

    qHxy

    /withVariation

    ])(3

    1

    3

    42[)(

    m)(e.g.,ntdisplacemeofunitithquantity w

    8)(

    224

    += (2)

    DO NOT MEMORIZE FORMULA WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING

    IT

    QUIZ:

    1.What is the deflection at the top of the cantilever?

    2.What is the highest power of Hx/ appearing in (2)?

    EXERCISE:

    1. Verify that )(xy given by (2) satisfies the boundary conditions

    1)-4)

    2. Sketch the deflection shape of the cantilever.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    4/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    4

    The moment )(xM and shear force )(xV of a section at x from the base

    are given by:

    )('')( xyEIxM = (3))()(

    )3( xyEIxV = (4)

    QUIZ:Say whether each of the following is assumed in equations (3)

    and (4).

    1)Linear stress-strain relationship

    2)Elastic material

    3)Plane-section remains plane in bending

    4)Small deformation

    EXERCISE:

    Sketch the moment and shear diagram.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    5/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    5

    2. Basic considerations

    When there are more than one wall acting together, the lateralload is distributed among the walls.

    The amount of load shared by each individual wall depends ontheir stiffness.

    Wind blows, pushes the external wall of building. Wind load is

    transferred to floor slabs, then from slabs to shear walls, eventually

    from shear walls to the base.

    Two important phenomena:

    Proportionate VS non-proportionate structures

    Proportionate: the ratio of flexural stiffness among the walls is

    constant with height.

    Twisting vs non-twisting deformation

    When either the load distribution or lateral stiffness of structure is not

    symmetric in plan, twisting or torsional deformation will occur, in

    addition to translational deformation.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    6/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    6

    Non-twisting Twisting

    Proportionate 1. Quantitative by handcalculation

    2. Quantitative by

    hand

    Non-proportionate 3. Qualitative or

    Quantitative by FEM(equivalent 2-D)

    4. Qualitative or

    3-D FEM

    QUIZ:Decide whether the following structures are proportionate or

    non-proportionate. Also decide whether they will twist whensubjected to the load indicated.

    Figure 2

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    7/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    7

    3. Proportionate non-twisting structures

    Assumptions:

    1)Shear walls deform in flexural (bending).

    2)Rigid floor assumption - Slab is rigid in-plane. This implies

    a)If there is no twisting deformation, the lateral displacement of

    all walls will be the same

    b)If there is twisting, the displacement of any point on the slab can

    be described in terms of a common translational and rotational

    component (see later)

    Equivalent 2-D models

    Assumption 2a allows us to use an equivalent 2-D model to study ashear-wall structure (which is originally a 3-D problem):

    OR

    OR

    Figure 3

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    8/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    8

    Notes to equivalent 2-D model:

    1)The rigid link means that the displacement of two walls at the same

    floor are the same

    2)The rigid link is hinged at the two walls so it does not provide anybending resistance

    3)The position of the wall is immaterial (why?)

    4)Which wall the external lateral load acts on is immaterial (why?)

    5)The walls bend individually, although they all have the same

    displacement at any given level. This means each wall has its own

    neutral axis, rather than having a common neutral axis for a groupof walls (c.f. tubular structures later). For example:

    Figure 4: Wall bending with strain and neutral axis shown

    QUIZ:Draw an equivalent 2-D model for the situation in Figure 4.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    9/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    9

    Method for computing shear and moment in walls (e.g., Smith &

    Coull, p.186):

    Distribute shear and moment proportional to the flexural rigidity

    of the wall

    Why?

    The following exercise helps you conclude that:

    For proportionate non-twisting structures, the distribution of shear

    does not depend on the level.

    Note that this does not mean that the shear taken by each wall does

    not depend on the level. Only the ratio among them does not.

    EXERCISE: Distribution of shear based on a continuum

    approach

    Figure 6

    Referring to the figure, we note that, from beam bending theory, for

    Wall 1,

    dx

    xdMxV

    )()( 11 =

    (the minus sign is necessary but unimportant; dont let it disturb you)

    and)('')()()( 111 xyxIxExM =

    which means

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    10/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    10

    )]()()([)(''

    1111xyxIxE

    dx

    dxV =

    Note that )(''')()()( 111 xyxIxExV because )()( 11 xIxE is in general a function

    ofx .

    If we do the same thing for Wall 2, we have)]()()([)(

    ''

    2222xyxIxE

    dx

    dxV =

    1)Is there any relationship between )(1 xy and )(2 xy ? If so, what is it?

    2)By substituting )()()()( 111 xIxEcxIxE = into the expression for )(1 xV and

    )()()()( 222 xIxEcxIxE = into the expression for )(2 xV , show that

    2

    1

    2

    1

    )(

    )(

    c

    c

    xV

    xV=

    and hence the shear distribution does not depend on the level x .3)Hence verify that

    constant)()(

    )()(

    )(

    )(

    22

    11

    2

    1

    2

    1 ===xIxE

    xIxE

    c

    c

    xV

    xV

    The previous exercise shows that the shear shared by a given wall at a

    given level x is proportional to EI of the wall.

    This means that for a proportionate non-twisting building, if we know

    the total shear of a give level of the building, we can calculate the

    amount of shear shared by the wall by just proportioning based on EI

    of the wall.

    The same is also true for sharing of moment among the walls (why?).

    Suppose the structure is proportionate. There are n walls with EIequal to )(11 xIE , , )(xIE nn . From previous discussions, we know that

    the shear force )(xVi taken by Wall i ( ni ,...,1= ) is proportional to

    )()()( xIxEcxIE iii = , so we can write)()( xIEKxV

    iii=

    for some constant K independent of i .

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    11/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    11

    QUIZ:Does K depend on x ? Why?

    Since the sum of the shear taken by the walls must balance the total

    shear V at the section of the building, we have

    VxVxVxVn

    =+++ )()()( 21 6

    VxIEKxIEKxIEK nn =+++ )()()( 2211 6

    and so

    =

    =+++

    =n

    i

    iinn xIE

    xVxIExIExIE

    xVK

    1

    2211 )(

    )()()()(

    )(6

    Thus, the shear taken by Wall i is given by

    1

    groupby walltakensheartotal

    )(

    ifor Wallfactorondistributi

    )(

    )()(

    1

    xV

    xIE

    xIExV

    n

    i

    ii

    iii =

    = 23245

    The same is true for the moment taken by the wall.

    YOU DONT NEED TO REMEMBER THIS FORMULA IF YOU

    UNDERSTAND ITS MEANING.

    The following exercise helps you illustrate that the equivalent EI of

    the group of walls is equal to the sum of the EI of the walls.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    12/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    12

    Equivalent stiffness of wall group based on a continuum approach

    The following shows that the equivalent lateral stiffness of a wall

    group is equal to the sum of the stiffness of all the walls.

    We first write down the beam equation for each wall individually(note the indices):

    )()()()(:Wall

    )()()()()(:1Wall

    )()()()()(:3Wall

    )()()()()(:2Wall

    )()()()()(:1Wall

    1

    )4(

    12

    )4(

    11

    32

    )4(

    33

    21

    )4(

    22

    1

    )4(

    11

    xwxyxIxEn

    xwxwxyxIxEn

    xwxwxyxIxE

    xwxwxyxIxE

    xwxqxyxIxE

    nnn

    nnnn

    =

    =

    ===

    7777

    Note that the term )(xq is the external loading and the terms)(),...,(),( 121 xwxwxw n arise from the interaction between the walls.

    Summing the above n equations, and noting that the terms

    )(),...,(),( 121 xwxwxw n are all canceled in the summation, we obtain

    )()()]()()()()()([)4(

    2211 xqxyxIxExIxExIxE nn =+++ 6

    that is,

    =

    = n

    i

    ii xIxE

    xqxy

    1

    )4(

    )()(

    )()(

    Note that this equation is identical to that of a single wall with an

    equivalent stiffness equal to =

    n

    i

    xIxE1

    11 )()( , and hence we conclude that:

    When multiple walls are connected through rigid links, the equivalent

    lateral stiffness of the group of walls is equal to the sum of the

    individual stiffness.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    13/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    13

    The following exercise helps you get a better feel of the above result

    based on what you have learnt from elementary beam formulae.

    EXERCISE:

    Figure 7

    1)Give an expression for 1 in terms of P , Q , 1E and 1I (Hint:

    look it up from a text book)

    2)Give an expression for 2 in terms ofQ , 2E and 2I 3) Note that 21 = (why?). By eliminating Q in the expressions

    obtained in 1) and 2), find an expression for 1 (or 2 ) in

    terms of P , 1E , 1I , 2E and 2I .

    By rearranging the answer for 3), you should be able to get

    13

    2211

    stiffnessequivalent

    )(3

    +=

    22 322 45 H

    IEIEP

    The middle term is the equivalent stiffness of this group of

    walls. Note that if Wall 2 is absent, the stiffness is 311 /3 HIE , and

    similarly, if Wall 1 is absent, the stiffness is 322 /3 HIE .

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    14/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    14

    QUIZ:Assume the walls are of the same material and thickness, and

    the lateral loads are the same in both cases. Which one has a

    greater horizontal displacement at point A?

    (a) (b)Figure 5

    QUIZ:According to our shear wall theory, assuming the walls are all

    the same, arrange the following wall configurations in ascending

    order of lateral stiffness.

    Figure 8

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    15/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    15

    QUIZ:According to our shear wall theory, assuming the walls are all of the

    same thickness and material, arrange the following wall

    configurations in ascending order of lateral stiffness.

    (a) (b) (c)

    Figure 9

    Walls acting together

    When walls are connected (e.g., through concrete and reinforcement),

    they act together, providing much greater lateral stiffness.

    For example, in Fig. 9(b) above, when the walls are not connected,

    the equivalent lateral stiffness of the wall group is just the sum of the

    individual stiffnesses, i.e.,

    61

    6122

    122)(

    32333

    )(9.

    bt

    b

    ttbtbbtEI bFig

    +=+= since

    b

    tis small

    However, when the four walls are connected as shown in Fig.9(c),

    they act as a section. The approximate equivalent EI should then be

    calculated as

    )(9.

    323

    )(9. )(4

    6

    4

    2

    2

    12

    2)(bFigcFig

    EIbtb

    tbbt

    EI ==

    +

    The above suggests that a significant amount of stiffness can be

    gained by couple the walls, or in general lateral systems, together so

    that they deform as a whole. Later, we will see one form of structural

    system, called tubular structures, which stems out from this idea.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    16/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    16

    4. Proportionate shear wall structures with twisting

    QUIZ:Decide whether the following structures are proportionate or

    non-proportionate. Also decide whether they will twist whensubjected to the load indicated.

    Figure 10

    Two common situations where twisting will occur:

    1)the load distribution is symmetric but the structure (wall

    configuration) is not symmetric

    2)the load is not symmetric but the structure is symmetric

    In general, twisting will occur when the stiffness center does not

    coincide with the section resultant center.

    Strictly speaking, twisting is NOT a property of a structure. It depends

    on BOTH the load pattern and the structural configuration.

    However, the load distribution is symmetric in quite many situations

    (e.g., unit-directional wind load), and so twisting may often beassociated with the structure, e.g., twisting structure or non-

    twisting structure. It is OK to use these terms, but bear in mind that

    twisting in general depends on both the loading and structure.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    17/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    17

    Method :

    E.g., see Smith & Coull, p.188-190

    In what follows, we will illustrate WHY and HOW a building twists

    in Case 1). Case 2) will be left as an exercise. The general case

    follows from superposition.

    Consider the portion of a building above a certain level. In general,

    the resultant shear acting on a section at any level must balance the

    load resultant (in terms of force and twisting moment).

    Figure 11

    The section resultant originates from the stresses at the sectionof the connecting members (i.e., columns).

    The stresses are caused by deformation (strains).

    Assuming the floor is rigid in-plane, the variation of thedeformation at different walls must be linear.

    Just as a line bxay += can always be written as a constant b plusa linear variation xa , such linear variation of deformation can

    always be decoupled into two components

    1)translational (i.e., every wall moves by the same amount in

    the same direction)

    2)rotational (the walls move around a common point by the

    same angle).

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    18/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    18

    Figure 12

    Figure 13

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    19/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    19

    The lateral displacement of each wall causes stresses in thesection, which give rise to a sectional resultant of shear force.

    The shear force in the walls can be considered as contributedfrom translational and rotational deformation.

    The distribution of the shear forces in the shear walls must be such

    that

    1)the force is balanced

    2)the moment is balanced

    The translation contribution of shear force in the walls can be easilydetermined from 1). Since the deformation is pure translational, there

    is no twisting, and so we can use the results about proportionate non-

    twisting structures, which says that the shear force is distributedproportional to the EI of the wall:

    V

    IE

    IEQ

    n

    j

    jj

    iii =

    =1

    twisting)(no

    The less-trivial task lies in the determination of the twisting

    component, which is essentially what you need to learn in this section.

    First of all, we need to know where the walls rotate about. How can

    we determine that? What law/principle/assumption, etc helps us find

    that?

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    20/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    20

    Center of rotation

    To invoke your thinking, lets look at what happens if the center of

    rotation is (arbitrarily) assumed to be at the left end, that is, all the

    walls rotate about the point C in Fig. 12, by an angle clockwise,

    say. Then, to the first order, Wall 1 will not translate, Wall 2 willmove by 2x and Wall 3 will move by 3x . Anything wrong?

    Figure 14

    QUIZ:Anything wrong?

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    21/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    21

    The center of rotation has to be such that the corresponding

    distribution of shear force in the walls must have a zero resultant.

    So lets use this principle to find the location of the center of rotation.

    In particular, suppose the center of rotation is at a distance x from the

    left end, as shown in Figure 13.

    Figure 15: Center of rotation.

    The displacements at Wall 1, 2, , n will be given by

    )()()(11

    zxxzy

    =,

    )()()( 22 zxxzy = ,

    )()()( zxxzy nn =

    The corresponding shear force in Wall 1, 2, , n will be given by

    [ ] [ ])('')()()()()()()( 111''

    1111zzIzE

    dz

    dxxzyzIzE

    dz

    dzQ == ,

    [ ] [ ])('')()()()()()()( 222''

    2222zzIzE

    dz

    dxxzyzIzE

    dz

    dzQ == ,

    [ ] [ ])('')()()()()()()( '' zzIzEdz

    dxxzyzIzE

    dz

    dzQ

    nnnnnnn==

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    22/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    22

    Since the structure is proportionate,

    )()()()( zIzEczIzE iii =

    for some )()( zIzE which does not depend on i .

    Substituting into the expression for )(zVi gives

    [ ] )()()('')()()()( zgxxczzIzEdz

    dxxczQ iiiii ==

    where [ ])('')()()( zzIzEdz

    dzg = .

    This means, at a given level z , the shear (due to rotation) shared by a

    wall is proportional to

    the distance of the wall from the center of rotation and the flexural rigidity of the wall (why?)

    Summing the shear forces in all the walls and setting it to zero:

    0)()(1

    ==

    zgxxcn

    i

    ii

    which yields (since 0)( zg )

    =

    =

    =

    = ==n

    i

    ii

    n

    i

    iii

    n

    i

    i

    n

    i

    ii

    zIzE

    xzIzE

    c

    xc

    x

    1

    1

    1

    1

    )()(

    )()(

    If we recall the definition of the center of mass of a group of masses

    1m

    , 2m , ,

    n

    m :

    =

    ==n

    i

    i

    n

    i

    ii

    m

    m

    xm

    x

    1

    1

    then it is natural to call x the center of rigidity.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    23/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    23

    QUIZ:What law/principle/assumption/requirement, etc., is used to find

    the location of the center of rigidity?

    QUIZ:Considering the rotational component of shear forces in the

    walls. Is the distribution necessarily linear among the walls?

    The following exercise shows that the center of rigidity is indeed the

    location where the resultant of the translational component of the

    shear forces of the wall system acts.

    EXERCISE:Find the location where the resultant translational component ofthe shear forces of all the walls acts and verify that it coincides

    with the center of rotation.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    24/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    24

    The walls twist about the center of rigidity of the wall system.

    Now that we know center of rotation, we can pursue further to find

    the amount of shear shared by the walls due to twisting action. Recall

    234534523245

    rigidityofcenterfrom

    iWallofarmmoment

    iwallofrigidity

    )determinedbe(togivenforconstant

    )()(component)l(rotationa

    torelated

    xxczgQ iii

    z

    =

    So far )(zg is unknown, and we have to determine its value. This is

    accomplished by considering the moment equilibrium of the buildingsection.

    Referring to Fig. 15 showing the forces acting on a building section.

    For convenience the location of the walls are measured from the

    center of rotation.

    The distance of the load resultant from the center of rigidity is

    commonly called eccentricity, and is denoted by e here.

    Recall that the center of rotation coincides with the center of rigidity,

    and therefore the resultant of the translational component of wallshears passes through the center of rotation. Summing moments about

    the center of rotation, we have:

    345232452324522 322 45

    rotationofcenterfromresultantloadofdistance

    sectionatresultantload

    rotationofcenterfromarmmoment

    iWallofforceshearofcomponentrotational

    )()()()(1

    ezVxxxxczgi

    n

    i

    ii=

    =

    After some algebra, we obtain

    =

    =

    n

    i

    iixxc

    ezVzg

    1

    2)(

    )()(

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    25/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    25

    and so

    1

    2222 32222 45

    factorondistributishear

    total1

    2

    1

    2 )()()(

    ))(()()(

    )(

    )()(l)(rotationa

    ==

    =

    =

    n

    j

    jjj

    iii

    n

    j

    jj

    ii

    i

    xxzIzE

    exxzIzEzV

    xxc

    exxczVQ

    We are almost done. The shear force taken by each wall is a sum of

    the translational and rotational component, that is,

    22222 322222 45222 3222 45

    componenttwisting

    componentnaltranslatio

    1

    2

    1

    l)(rotationaonal)(translati

    )()()(

    ))(()(

    )()()(

    )()()(

    (z)(z))(

    ==

    +=

    +=

    n

    j

    jjj

    iii

    n

    j

    jj

    ii

    iii

    xxzIzE

    exxzIzE

    zVzIzE

    zIzEzV

    QQzQ

    To help you get a feel for the formula, note that

    1)the shear shared by a given wall is a sum of translational and

    rotational component

    2)the translational component is proportional to EI of the wall

    3)the rotational component is related totyeccentriciarmmoment EI

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    26/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    26

    QUIZ: In each configuration in Table 1, say which of the

    following statements is true (note that the statements exhaust all

    possibilities):

    1)twisting must occur2)twisting must not occur

    3)twisting may or may not occur, depending on the actual

    dimensions

    Structure

    Symmetric Not symmetric

    SymmetricLoad

    Not symmetric

    Table 1

    QUIZ:

    What law/principle/assumption, etc., is used to find the twistingcomponent of shear shared by each wall?

    QUIZ:What law/principle/assumption, etc., is used to find the

    translational component of shear shared by each wall?

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    27/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    27

    In summary, to determine the shear shared by each wall in a given

    level of a proportionate shear wall structure that may twist under the

    applied load:

    1)determine the total shear at the level of the building

    2)find the translational component of the shear shared by each wall

    3)compute the location of the center of rotation, which coincides with

    the location where the resultant of the translational components

    acts

    4)compute the twisting component of shear shared by each wall

    5)sum the translational and twisting component of shear to give theshear force shared by each wall

    The summary only serves to clarify what we have learnt so far, and

    should not be taken as a recipe. The equations involved in the

    calculations are deliberately omitted in the summary. You should

    have a good idea of what they look like.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    28/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    28

    5. Non-proportionate structures

    the shear force shared by each wall is not necessarilyproportional to its rigidity, even in the absence of twisting.

    the determination of shear shared by each wall requires moresophisticated analysis methods, such as finite element method.

    When no twisting occurs, 2-D equivalent models may be used(which requires finite elements)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    29/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    29

    Effect of opening at the base

    Opening on the edge of wall

    333

    edge 1

    1212

    )(

    =

    =b

    dwbdbwI

    Opening in the center of wall

    ++

    =

    +

    +

    =

    223

    23

    center

    13114

    1

    12

    4212

    )2

    (

    2

    b

    d

    b

    d

    b

    dwb

    dbdbw

    dbw

    I

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    bd/

    12/3edge

    wb

    I

    12/3

    center

    wb

    I

    Figure 16

    As bd/ increases, edgeI decreses in a cubic manner (quite fast!) while

    centerI decreases in a much slower fashion, although both correspond to

    the same reduction in section shear area. This means that taking out

    material in the center will have a less severe effect on the flexural

    resistance than from the edge.

    The ratio of centerI to edgeI is given by:

    +

    +=2

    edge

    center

    /1

    /131

    4

    1

    bd

    bd

    I

    I

    Note that the ratio depends only the the ratio of d to b . As an

    illustrative example, if 2/1/ =bd , then 7/ edgecenter =II , that is, opening at

    the center rather than at the edge gives 6 times stiffer base!

    12/3edge

    wb

    I

    12/3center

    wb

    I

    b

    2/d 2/d

    b

    d

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    30/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    30

    2-D Finite Element Models

    The walls are divided and modelled as beam elements (othertypes of elements are also possible)

    The nodes specify the geometrical layout of the model

    Elements are formed among nodes

    An element is characterized by itso Element type, e.g., beam, plate, shell; specifies the

    behaviour of the elemento Connectivity (which and how the nodes form the

    element; determines the geometry of the element, e.g.,length, orientation)

    o Material/sectional property (e.g., E, I)

    Each node associated with a beam element has 3 displacementresponses, or degree-of-freedom (DOF):

    o DX: horizontal displacement

    o DY: vertical displacement

    o DZ: rotation (how much the element has rotated at the

    node)

    Each node associated with a beam element has 3 elementforces:

    o FX: horizontal force

    o FY: vertical force

    o MZ: moment

    Results (displacement, internal force) are computed AT THENODES ONLY

    Intuition can help understand sign convention adopted

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    31/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    31

    Illustrative example (Smith & Coull, p.192)

    QUIZ:Is the shearwall structure proportionate? Will it twist?

    QUIZ:Draw an equivalent 2-D model for the shearwall structure.

    Finite element model for the 2-D equivalent model

    Wall 1 Wall 2

    1

    2

    3

    20

    21

    22

    23

    40

    41

    42

    43

    60

    1/F

    2/F

    3/F

    20/F

    Roof

    1

    2

    3

    20

    19

    21

    22

    23

    40

    39

    41

    42

    43

    59

    60

    FY1

    FX1M1

    FY2

    FX2

    M2

    1st

    node

    2nd

    node

    (b) Element force definition

    Wall 3

    (half)

    4/F

    (a) Finite element model

    y

    x

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    32/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    32

    FEM RESULTS: NODAL DISPLACEMENTS

    ================================

    Node DX (m) DY (m) DZ (rad)

    1 2.77e-004 0.00e+000 -1.55e-004

    2 1.07e-003 0.00e+000 -2.95e-004

    3 2.33e-003 0.00e+000 -4.21e-004

    4 4.00e-003 0.00e+000 -5.32e-004

    5 6.04e-003 0.00e+000 -6.29e-004

    6 8.40e-003 0.00e+000 -7.21e-004

    7 1.12e-002 0.00e+000 -8.64e-004

    8 1.44e-002 0.00e+000 -9.92e-004

    9 1.81e-002 0.00e+000 -1.10e-003

    10 2.21e-002 0.00e+000 -1.19e-003

    11 2.64e-002 0.00e+000 -1.26e-003

    12 3.09e-002 0.00e+000 -1.32e-003

    13 3.56e-002 0.00e+000 -1.36e-003

    14 4.04e-002 0.00e+000 -1.41e-003

    15 4.54e-002 0.00e+000 -1.44e-003

    16 5.05e-002 0.00e+000 -1.46e-003

    17 5.56e-002 0.00e+000 -1.47e-003

    18 6.08e-002 0.00e+000 -1.47e-003

    19 6.59e-002 0.00e+000 -1.48e-003

    20 7.11e-002 0.00e+000 -1.48e-003

    21 2.77e-004 0.00e+000 -1.55e-00422 1.07e-003 0.00e+000 -2.95e-004

    23 2.33e-003 0.00e+000 -4.21e-004

    24 4.00e-003 0.00e+000 -5.31e-004

    25 6.04e-003 0.00e+000 -6.33e-004

    26 8.40e-003 0.00e+000 -7.06e-004

    27 1.12e-002 0.00e+000 -8.69e-004

    28 1.44e-002 0.00e+000 -9.90e-004

    29 1.81e-002 0.00e+000 -1.10e-003

    30 2.21e-002 0.00e+000 -1.19e-003

    31 2.64e-002 0.00e+000 -1.26e-003

    32 3.09e-002 0.00e+000 -1.32e-003

    33 3.56e-002 0.00e+000 -1.36e-003

    34 4.04e-002 0.00e+000 -1.41e-003

    35 4.54e-002 0.00e+000 -1.44e-003

    36 5.05e-002 0.00e+000 -1.46e-003

    37 5.56e-002 0.00e+000 -1.47e-003

    38 6.08e-002 0.00e+000 -1.47e-003

    39 6.59e-002 0.00e+000 -1.48e-003

    40 7.11e-002 0.00e+000 -1.48e-003

    41 2.77e-004 0.00e+000 -1.55e-004

    42 1.07e-003 0.00e+000 -2.95e-004

    43 2.33e-003 0.00e+000 -4.21e-004

    44 4.00e-003 0.00e+000 -5.32e-004

    45 6.04e-003 0.00e+000 -6.30e-004

    46 8.40e-003 0.00e+000 -7.18e-004

    47 1.12e-002 0.00e+000 -8.65e-004

    48 1.44e-002 0.00e+000 -9.91e-004

    49 1.81e-002 0.00e+000 -1.10e-003

    50 2.21e-002 0.00e+000 -1.19e-003

    51 2.64e-002 0.00e+000 -1.26e-003

    52 3.09e-002 0.00e+000 -1.32e-003

    53 3.56e-002 0.00e+000 -1.36e-003

    54 4.04e-002 0.00e+000 -1.41e-003

    55 4.54e-002 0.00e+000 -1.44e-003

    56 5.05e-002 0.00e+000 -1.46e-003

    57 5.56e-002 0.00e+000 -1.47e-003

    58 6.08e-002 0.00e+000 -1.47e-003

    59 6.59e-002 0.00e+000 -1.48e-003

    60 7.11e-002 0.00e+000 -1.48e-003

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    33/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    33

    FEM RESULTS: ELEMENT FORCE

    ==========================

    Ele. FX1 (N) FY1 (N) MZ1 (Nm) FX2 (N) FY2 (N) MZ2 (Nm)

    1 -6.91e+005 0.00e+000 2.47e+007 6.91e+005 0.00e+000 -2.23e+007

    2 -6.49e+005 0.00e+000 2.23e+007 6.49e+005 0.00e+000 -2.01e+007

    3 -6.38e+005 0.00e+000 2.01e+007 6.38e+005 0.00e+000 -1.78e+007

    4 -5.12e+005 0.00e+000 1.78e+007 5.12e+005 0.00e+000 -1.60e+007

    5 -8.12e+005 0.00e+000 1.60e+007 8.12e+005 0.00e+000 -1.32e+007

    6 4.74e+005 0.00e+000 1.32e+007 -4.74e+005 0.00e+000 -1.48e+007

    7 -2.37e+005 0.00e+000 1.48e+007 2.37e+005 0.00e+000 -1.40e+007

    8 -6.85e+005 0.00e+000 1.40e+007 6.85e+005 0.00e+000 -1.16e+007

    9 -5.07e+005 0.00e+000 1.16e+007 5.07e+005 0.00e+000 -9.85e+006

    10 -4.92e+005 0.00e+000 9.85e+006 4.92e+005 0.00e+000 -8.13e+006

    11 -4.50e+005 0.00e+000 8.13e+006 4.50e+005 0.00e+000 -6.55e+006

    12 -3.56e+005 0.00e+000 6.55e+006 3.56e+005 0.00e+000 -5.31e+006

    13 -4.94e+005 0.00e+000 5.31e+006 4.94e+005 0.00e+000 -3.58e+006

    14 -3.65e+005 0.00e+000 3.58e+006 3.65e+005 0.00e+000 -2.30e+006

    15 -1.77e+005 0.00e+000 2.30e+006 1.77e+005 0.00e+000 -1.68e+006

    16 -1.79e+005 0.00e+000 1.68e+006 1.79e+005 0.00e+000 -1.05e+006

    17 -1.30e+005 0.00e+000 1.05e+006 1.30e+005 0.00e+000 -5.99e+005

    18 -9.54e+004 0.00e+000 5.99e+005 9.54e+004 0.00e+000 -2.65e+005

    19 -5.67e+004 0.00e+000 2.65e+005 5.67e+004 0.00e+000 -6.64e+004

    20 -1.90e+004 0.00e+000 6.64e+004 1.90e+004 0.00e+000 -2.38e-00721 -5.11e+005 0.00e+000 1.84e+007 5.11e+005 0.00e+000 -1.66e+007

    22 -4.95e+005 0.00e+000 1.66e+007 4.95e+005 0.00e+000 -1.49e+007

    23 -4.32e+005 0.00e+000 1.49e+007 4.32e+005 0.00e+000 -1.34e+007

    24 -5.40e+005 0.00e+000 1.34e+007 5.40e+005 0.00e+000 -1.15e+007

    25 -1.30e+004 0.00e+000 1.15e+007 1.30e+004 0.00e+000 -1.15e+007

    26 -1.86e+006 0.00e+000 1.15e+007 1.86e+006 0.00e+000 -4.96e+006

    27 -5.41e+005 0.00e+000 4.96e+006 5.41e+005 0.00e+000 -3.07e+006

    28 -3.78e+004 0.00e+000 3.07e+006 3.78e+004 0.00e+000 -2.93e+006

    29 -1.58e+005 0.00e+000 2.93e+006 1.58e+005 0.00e+000 -2.38e+006

    30 -1.11e+005 0.00e+000 2.38e+006 1.11e+005 0.00e+000 -1.99e+006

    31 -1.12e+005 0.00e+000 1.99e+006 1.12e+005 0.00e+000 -1.60e+006

    32 -8.63e+004 0.00e+000 1.60e+006 8.63e+004 0.00e+000 -1.30e+006

    33 -1.21e+005 0.00e+000 1.30e+006 1.21e+005 0.00e+000 -8.74e+005

    34 -8.92e+004 0.00e+000 8.74e+005 8.92e+004 0.00e+000 -5.62e+005

    35 -4.31e+004 0.00e+000 5.62e+005 4.31e+004 0.00e+000 -4.11e+005

    36 -4.37e+004 0.00e+000 4.11e+005 4.37e+004 0.00e+000 -2.58e+005

    37 -3.18e+004 0.00e+000 2.58e+005 3.18e+004 0.00e+000 -1.46e+005

    38 -2.33e+004 0.00e+000 1.46e+005 2.33e+004 0.00e+000 -6.47e+004

    39 -1.38e+004 0.00e+000 6.47e+004 1.38e+004 0.00e+000 -1.62e+004

    40 -4.63e+003 0.00e+000 1.62e+004 4.63e+003 0.00e+000 -4.47e-008

    41 -8.46e+005 0.00e+000 3.03e+007 8.46e+005 0.00e+000 -2.74e+007

    42 -7.99e+005 0.00e+000 2.74e+007 7.99e+005 0.00e+000 -2.46e+007

    43 -7.68e+005 0.00e+000 2.46e+007 7.68e+005 0.00e+000 -2.19e+007

    44 -6.80e+005 0.00e+000 2.19e+007 6.80e+005 0.00e+000 -1.95e+007

    45 -8.02e+005 0.00e+000 1.95e+007 8.02e+005 0.00e+000 -1.67e+007

    46 -1.41e+005 0.00e+000 1.67e+007 1.41e+005 0.00e+000 -1.62e+007

    47 -6.40e+005 0.00e+000 1.62e+007 6.40e+005 0.00e+000 -1.40e+007

    48 -5.90e+005 0.00e+000 1.40e+007 5.90e+005 0.00e+000 -1.19e+007

    49 -5.42e+005 0.00e+000 1.19e+007 5.42e+005 0.00e+000 -1.00e+007

    50 -4.99e+005 0.00e+000 1.00e+007 4.99e+005 0.00e+000 -8.26e+006

    51 -4.36e+005 0.00e+000 8.26e+006 4.36e+005 0.00e+000 -6.73e+006

    52 -4.50e+005 0.00e+000 6.73e+006 4.50e+005 0.00e+000 -5.16e+006

    53 -1.73e+005 0.00e+000 5.16e+006 1.73e+005 0.00e+000 -4.55e+006

    54 -2.28e+005 0.00e+000 4.55e+006 2.28e+005 0.00e+000 -3.75e+006

    55 -3.58e+005 0.00e+000 3.75e+006 3.58e+005 0.00e+000 -2.50e+006

    56 -2.50e+005 0.00e+000 2.50e+006 2.50e+005 0.00e+000 -1.63e+006

    57 -2.05e+005 0.00e+000 1.63e+006 2.05e+005 0.00e+000 -9.09e+005

    58 -1.44e+005 0.00e+000 9.09e+005 1.44e+005 0.00e+000 -4.05e+005

    59 -8.70e+004 0.00e+000 4.05e+005 8.70e+004 0.00e+000 -1.01e+005

    60 -2.89e+004 0.00e+000 1.01e+005 2.89e+004 0.00e+000 1.91e-006

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    34/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    34

    QUIZ:Say whether each of the following should hold in the FEM

    output. Verify your claim using results from the FEM output.

    For every floor, sum of wall shears = external shear?

    For every floor, sum of wall moments = external moment?

    At the base, displacement = rotation = 0?

    At every floor, all walls have the same DX?

    For each element, FX1+FX2 = 0?

    Top and bottom moment at each node should balance?

    Top and bottom shear at each node should balance?

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    35/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    35

    -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2

    4

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    1012

    14

    16

    18

    20

    Wall moment kN m

    Floor

    Wall 1Wall 2Wall 3 (half)

    External moment

    Wall moment distribution

    (piece-wise linear)

    -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    Wall shear kN

    Floor

    Wall 1Wall 2Wall 3 (half)

    External shear

    Wall shear distribution with floor level

    (note the shear at change levels 6 and 13)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    36/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    36

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Floor

    Wall 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 (half)(including external force)

    Force transferred from Floor slab to walls(note that adjacent force pairs do not necessarily balance)

    QUIZ:Does the floor slab forces sum to zero at each floor?

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    37/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    1

    Wall-frame structures

    1. Introduction

    In low rise structures (e.g., less than 20 stories), shear wallstake the majority of the lateral load

    As height of structure increases, the lateral load shared by theframe increases

    Economical up to 50 stories

    2. Method of analysis

    Case Method

    Twisting 3-D FEM

    Non-twisting 2-D FEM (equiv. 2-D model)

    Non-twisting

    (assuming simple loading and

    structural property)

    equiv. 2-D continuum

    analytical

    3. Equivalent 2-D model

    Consider non-twisting cases only

    Assume (In-plane) Rigid-floor

    Flexural stiffness of lintel beams (that connects the walland the frame) is often (but not always) neglected.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    38/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    2

    EXERCISE:

    Draw an equivalent 2-D model for the structures in Figures 11.2

    (a)-(c) of Smith & Coull (p.256).

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    39/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    3

    Coupling of wall and frame

    QUIZ:

    Determine in the following situations.

    Figure 1(a)

    Figure 1(b)

    QUIZ:

    Is the equivalent stiffness of a frame-wall group equal to the

    sum of the stiffness of the frames and walls? Why?

    In the case of proportionate shear-wall structures, the walls bend

    in the same manner, or mathematically, the governing

    differential equations for the deflection of the different walls are

    of the same form. As a result, the stiffness of the wall-group isjust the sum of the individual stiffness, i.e., their stiffness ADD.

    Frames and shear walls deform differently, and as a result their

    stiffness DO NOT ADD. Thats why we need this chapter.

    See Figure 11.3 of Smith & Coull (p.258).

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    40/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    4

    4. Continuum approach

    Why continuum?

    To gain insights about the structural behavior, which helpsinterpret the computer results and detect possible errors.

    An elegant way of describing the behavior of the frame-wall system in terms of differential equations.

    Idealization

    Discrete Continuum

    Shear wall Flexural beam

    Frame Shear beam

    Concentrated load

    At floor level

    Distributed load

    along beam

    Simplification (see later)

    Flexural stiffness of beam (for shear wall) = constant

    Shear stiffness of shear beam (for frame) = constant

    Distributed load = constant

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    41/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    5

    3. Behavior of Wall (flexural beam)

    The differential equation for the deflection of the wall is that of

    a flexural beam:

    [ ] )()()()()2(

    2

    2

    zwzyzIzEdzd = (1)

    If the rigidity )()( zIzE is constant with height, that is, does not

    depend on x , then

    EI

    zwzy

    )()(

    )4( = (2)

    The boundary conditions for a fixed-free situation are:

    a) 0)0( =y

    b) 0)0(' =y

    c) 0)()2( =Hy

    d) 0)()3( =Hy

    4. Behavior of Frame (shear beam)

    as shear beam, which deform purely in shear (no bending)

    o DOES NOT mean that the columns deform in sheardeformation

    ojust means that the frame as a whole deforms like a

    shear beam, in the sense that the interstory drift is

    approximately proportional to the shear force acting

    at the story (see later).

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    42/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    6

    Figure 2: Shear beam

    The shear force )(zQ on a section of a shear beam is

    proportional to the slope of the beam (Figure 2(b)):

    )(')( zyAGzQ = (3)

    where G is the (equivalent) shear modulus and A is the

    sectional area of the shear beam.

    Note that when we idealize a frame as a shear beam, thevalue of G and A is NOT necessarily the corresponding

    values of the columns

    By static equilibrium (Figure 2(c)), the shear )(zQ is related to

    the distributed load )(zw by:

    )(')( zQzw = (4)

    and so by combing (3) and (4) the governing differential

    equation of a shear beam is given by:

    AG

    zwzy

    )()('' = (5)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    43/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    7

    Since (5) is a second order ODE, there should be two boundary

    conditions. For a fixed-free situation, the boundary conditions

    are:

    a) 0)0( =y b) 0)(' =Hy

    QUIZ:

    Explain what the boundary conditions a) and b) mean.

    QUIZ:

    What is order of the differential equation for a shear beam?

    5. Wall-frame system

    Refer to Figure 11.5 of Smith & Coull (p.261)

    For the wall, according to eq. (1),

    [ ] )()()()()( )2(2

    2

    zuzwzyzIzEdz

    d= (6)

    For the frame modeled as a shear beam, from eq. (4),

    )('')( zyAGzu = (7)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    44/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    8

    Substituting (7) into (6) yields

    [ ] )()('')()()('')()(2

    2

    zwzyzAzGzyzIzEdz

    d= (6)

    Boundary conditions for fixed-free situation:

    a) Zero displacement at the base: 0)0( =y b) Zero slope at the based: 0)0(' =y c) Zero wall moment at the top: 0)(

    )2( =Hy d) Zero shear at the top: 0)(')(

    )3( = HyGAHyEI

    In order to allow for analytical solution for the governingdifferential equations, we assume the properties of the walls and

    frames to be constant through their height. That is,

    constant)()( ==EIzIzE

    andconstant)()( == GAzAzG

    This assumption is often NOT met in real situations, sincegenerally the column sizes decreases up the height of the

    building, due to decreasing demand in gravity load

    capacity

    For this reason, the results to follow is NOT expected tohelp you do the calculations for an actual wall-frame

    structure, but rather to illustrate from the analytical

    solution some of the important behavior.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    45/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    9

    With the simplification mentioned, the governing differential

    equation becomes

    IE

    zwzy

    IE

    AGzy

    )()('')(

    )4( = (8)

    If we define

    IE

    AG=2 (9)

    then (6) becomes

    IE

    zwzyzy

    )()('')( 2)4( = (10)

    For uniformly distributed load, that is, )(zq = constant, then the

    solution to the ODE in (10) satisfying the boundary conditionsa)-d) is given by (see eq.(11.29) on p.268 of Smith & Coull):

    123

    123

    factorvariation

    wloadddistributeuniformlyunderbeam

    cantileveraoftopat thentdisplaceme essdimensionl

    1

    4

    )(8

    )( zKEI

    wHzy =

    where

    ( )

    +

    +=

    2

    2

    412

    1)(sinh1cosh

    cosh

    1sinh8)(

    H

    z

    H

    zHzHz

    H

    HH

    HzK

    See Figure 11.8(a) on p.270 or Figure A2.1 on p.504 of Smith

    & Coull for the shape of )(1 zK .

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    46/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    10

    QUIZ:

    Explain, without any calculation, why 1)(1 =HK if 0= (Hint:imagine what the wall-frame model will look like if 0= ).

    The reason I put the (complicated) formula for )(1 zK is notto let you memorize it, nor do I expect you to use it

    frequently. It is just to let you have an idea of the form and

    its complexity. It is more important to understand and

    develop insights into the formula than to memorize it.

    You can look up Smith and Coull for the solution for otherload distributions, such as a triangularly distributed load. It

    turns out that the results do not differently qualitatively

    from those for the uniformly distributed load.

    6. Forces in the wall and frame

    Wall moment

    )(2

    )(''8

    )('')( 3

    2

    1

    4

    zKwH

    zKHw

    zyEIzMb

    ===

    QUIZ:

    Explain, without any calculation, why 1)0(3 =K if 0= .

    See Figure 11.8 on p.270 or Figure A2.3 on p.505 of Smith &

    Coull

    wall moment becomes negative near top of wall as increases (i.e., there exist hinge-point)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    47/75

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    48/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    12

    Frame moment

    The frame moment can be obtained as the external moment

    minus the wall moment:

    )(22

    )(

    )(2

    )()(

    3

    22

    2

    zKHwzHw

    zMzHw

    zMbs

    =

    =

    Frame shear

    The frame shear is equal to the external shear minus the wall

    shear at that level:

    )()()( zQzHwzQbs

    =

    QUIZ:

    Can we use the following formula for the frame shear? Is it

    consistent with the previous formula?

    )(')( zyAGzQs =

    See Figure 11.10 on p.274 of Smith & Coull

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    49/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    13

    7. Determination of parameters for continuum model

    Equivalent value of IE

    Just the IE of wall.

    Equivalent value of AG

    For a shear beam,

    dz

    dyAGQ =

    that is,

    dzdyQAG/

    =

    Figure 3

    force needed to produce a unit slope of the shear beam

    force acting needed to cause a unit slope of a story of theframe

    We need to analyze the frame such as shown in Figure 3 (for

    single bay) subjected to a lateral force Q and compute the

    resulting lateral displacement . The resulting slope(analogous to the term dzdy/ ) of the frame is then given by h/ where h is the height of the story. The equivalent value of GA

    is then obtained as

    =

    =

    hQ

    h

    QGA

    /

    It is difficult to analyze the frame as it is a highly indeterminate

    structure. The resulting expression for would be verycomplicated and not amicable for use or getting insight. Instead,

    we make some assumptions to reduce the structure to a

    determinate one and obtain an approximate expression for h/ .

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    50/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    14

    Simplifying assumptions

    The hinges at the mid length of the columns and girders.

    Neglect axial deformation

    With these assumptions, the result is

    gc EI

    lPh

    EI

    Ph

    )(24)(24

    23

    +=

    and hence1

    2

    )(24)(24

    +=

    =

    gc EIlh

    EIhPhGA

    The factor cEI)(24 comes from cEI)(122 , and 2 comes from the fact that we have got 2 columns acting.

    cEI)(12 is the familiar term appearing in the lateralstiffness of a fixed-fixed end beam. Similarly for

    gEI)(24 .

    EXERCISE:

    Derive the expression for . (Hint: virtual work method)

    For multiple bays, the expression for GA is analogous:

    1

    )/12()/12(

    += ggc lEI

    h

    hEI

    hGA

    where c sums over all columns and g sums over allgirders in the story, where l represents the length of each girder.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    51/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    1

    Tubular structures

    1. Introduction

    Lateral load predominantly resisted by perimeter rigid-jointedstructural frame

    Perimeter frames act together to give substantially greaterlateral resistance than acting alone

    Deep spandrel girders at the perimeter frame are needed forstrong coupling

    Suitable for both steel and reinforced concrete construction

    100+ stories possible (e.g., WTC in NYC: 110 stories, 411mhigh, aspect ratio 6.5:1)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    52/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    2

    2. Basic cantilever behavior and discrepancies

    cantilever in bending (plane section remains plane).

    1)The elongation of a column is proportional to its

    perpendicular distance from the common neutral axis of

    bending

    2)The perimeter frames perpendicular to the wind direction act

    as the flange part of the section, and resist primary the

    moment resultant of the building section. For this reason,

    they are called flange frame.

    3)The perimeter frames parallel to the direction of the wind act

    as the web part of the section, and resist primary the shear

    resultant of the building section. For this reason, they are

    called web frame.

    Fig. 1: Idealized behavior of tubular structure

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    53/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    3

    Separate perimeter frames

    To understand the interaction between the web-frames and

    flange-frames, first consider four perimeter frames without

    connections, but connected by (in-plane) rigid floors only. Inthis case,

    1)The frames act individually

    2)The web-frames are bending in their strong direction while

    the flange frames in their weak direction

    3)As a result, the web-frames provide the majority of the lateral

    resistance, while the lateral resistance from the flange framesis negligible.

    4)The columns of the flange-frames bend with their ownneutral axis.

    Fig. 2: Perimeter frames acting individually

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    54/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    4

    Perimeter frames connected together (Tubular structures)

    For tubular structures, the four perimeter frames are connected

    through the common columns.

    1)The corner columns transmit vertical shear force from the

    web-frames to the flange frames

    2)The corner columns on the windward side are pulled up.

    Through the spandrel girders, the inner columns of the

    flange-frames on the pulled up also, but the extent depends

    on the bending stiffness of the spandrel girders.

    3)The phenomenon that the inner columns do not deform thesame degree as the corner columns due to flexibility of the

    spandrel beams is known as shear lag.

    Fig. 3: Perimeter frames acting together to form a tubular

    structure

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    55/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    5

    3. Equivalent 2-D model for tubular structures

    Illustrated using the tubular structure shown in Fig. 4.

    Fig. 4

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    56/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    6

    Fig. 5(a): Equivalent 2-D model for Fig. 4

    (based on left-right symmetry)

    Notes to Fig.5(a):

    1)based on considering left portion of building

    2)the sign represents that the vertical displacement of the

    nodes connected by the sign are constrained to be equal; it

    models the connection between flange-frame and web-frame

    3)apply wind load to the web-frames, but not the flange-frames

    4)symmetric B.C. at mid girder of flange-frames

    5)apply wind load to web-frame, but not flange-frames

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    57/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    7

    Fig. 5(b): Equivalent 2-D model for Fig. 4

    (based on left-right skew symmetry of Fig. 5a)

    Notes to Fig.5(b):

    1)skew-symmetric B.C. at mid column imposed by

    a) 2/cII= to represent half column and

    b) =A (or setting 0=DY at the node)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    58/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    8

    Fig. 6(a): Equivalent 2-D models for Fig. 4

    (based on top-bottom skew symmetry)

    Notes to Fig.6(a):

    1)Based on considering lower half of building

    2)skew-symmetrical boundary condition (B.C.) at mid columnof web-frame imposed by a) 2/cII= to represent halfcolumn and b) =A (or setting 0=DY at the node)

    3)wind load to the two web-frames acts in opposite direction to

    be consistent with the direction of wind load in the original 3-

    D model

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    59/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    9

    Fig. 6(b): Equivalent 2-D models for Fig. 4

    (based on left-right symmetry of Fig. 6a)

    Notes to Fig.6(b):

    1)symmetric B.C. at mid girder imposed by

    a) zero horizontal displacement and

    b) zero rotation

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    60/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    10

    Interpreting FEM results

    The equivalent 2-D model can be analyzed using any available

    frame analysis program. The results should be interpreted

    carefully. The followings are noteworthy:

    1)The horizontal displacement of the web-frame in the 2-D

    model represents the horizontal displacement in the load

    direction of the 3-D model.

    2)In the 2-D model, the axial force of the columns, bending

    moment and shear force of the spandrel beams represent

    those of the 3-D model.

    3)The horizontal displacement of the flange-frame in the 2-D

    model DOES NOT represent the horizontal displacement of

    the 3-D model in the load direction. Rather, the latter isassumed to be equal to the horizontal displacement of the

    web-frame in the 2-D model, as a result of the rigid floor

    assumption.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    61/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    11

    QUIZ:

    Decide whether the following 2-D models can be used for

    studying the structure subjected to the load as shown.

    Fig. 7(a)

    Fig. 7(b)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    62/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    12

    4. Reconciliation between tubular and frame model

    Suppose we are given a floor plan of columns and beams. In

    constructing an equivalent 2-D model, there are two natural

    choices:

    1)model the building as an assembly of frames connected with

    rigid links

    2)model the building as a tubular structure

    Which one should we adopt? What factors tell us whichchoice to adopt?

    Suppose spandrel girders are planned to actuate the tubular

    action, then what should the equivalent 2-D model for Fig.7(b)?

    Let see what goes wrong with the 2-D model in Fig.7(b). In the

    2-D model for Fig.7(b),

    1)frame action in subframes 1, 2, 3 and 4 are modelled

    2)rigid floor assumption is enforced through the rigid links

    However, the effect of the spandrel girders in promoting tubular

    action is not modeled. For example, the vertical movement of

    columns A, B, C and D are not related directly. In summary,

    Tubular action is NOT modeled in the 2-D model of Fig.7(b)

    The inner columns and spandrel girders help promote tubular

    action. With tubular actions enforced, the structure shown on theleft of Fig.7(b) is often known as bundled tube structure.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    63/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    13

    5. Equivalent 2-D model for bundled tube structure

    EXERCISE:

    Draw an equivalent 2-D model for the structure shown inFig.7(b), enforcing tubular action.

    See also Fig.12.10 on p.304 of Smith & Coull.

    6. Couple with other lateral systems

    If there are other lateral structural systems in the building thatbend with their own neutral axis, they can be represented in the

    equivalent 2-D model by rigid links (rigid floor assumption),

    assuming no twisting.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    64/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    14

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    65/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    15

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    66/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    16

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    67/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    1

    Miscellaneous topics

    Creep/Relaxation

    Creep: deformation under constant load

    Relaxation: reduction of stress under constant strain

    Scientific origin of creep:According to statistical/quantum mechanics atoms have a non-zero

    strain rate even under constant load, at nonzero absolute temperatures

    ( 15.273+= CK ).

    Creep in RC depends on

    1.Temperature (higher temp., higher creep)

    2.Steel ratio (higher steel ratio, lower creep)

    3.Volume to surface area ratio (higher V/S ratio, lower creep)

    4.Age, loading history, etc (higher age at loading, lower creep)

    Creep effects are especially important in the design of structuresoperating at elevated temperatures, e.g., engines, furnaces, structural

    members against fire.

    Shear walls usually have a higher creep than columns since

    1. it has a smaller steel ratio

    2. it has smaller V/S ratio

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    68/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    2

    Temperature effects under normal conditions (e.g., < 100 C )

    Essentially elastic under normal working conditions; may assume, e.g.,E constant

    Induce deformation but no stress in determinate structures

    Induce deformation and stress in indeterminate structures

    Often serviceability concerns, e.g., cracks in in-filled panels, exteriorfacet.

    Thermal strain is often described by

    Coefficient of thermal expansion, = strain induced per C rise

    In general, depends on temperature, but average values may be used

    CC

    C

    ==

    /101~/107.11

    /109.9 56

    steel

    6

    concrete

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    69/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    3

    Thermally-induced axial deformation

    QUIZ:

    Determine the strain, stress and displacement induced by thetemperature changes as shown.

    T T T T

    T T

    (a) (b) (c)

    Notes:

    Strictly speaking, there is no stress associated with thermal strain (whichis obvious in unrestrained situations).

    When there is mechanical restraints (e.g., axial expansion/contraction ofcolumn is restricted), however, some mechanical strain will be inducedto compensate for the thermal strain in order to satisfy the restraint.

    The stress associated with such mechanical strain is often called thermalstress.

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    70/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    4

    QUIZ:

    Determine the axial force and top displacement for the followings.

    T T

    EATP =

    (a) (b)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    71/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    5

    Equivalent load formulation

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    72/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    6

    Thermally-induced flexural deformation

    Due to temperature gradient across section Temperature gradient often assumed linear across section

    Flexural effect may be superimposed with axial effect

    2

    21TT

    T+

    = 1T = +

    Axial Flexural

    2

    T

    2

    T

    2T

    Original

    What is the curvature induced by the thermal gradient?

    For any fibre at a distance r from the neutral

    axis,

    )(''/)( zyrRrr == (1)

    so at face 2 where 2/br= ,

    )(''2

    2 zyb= (2)

    On the other hand,

    22

    T= (3)

    Combining (2) and (3) gives

    b

    Tzy

    =

    )('' (4)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    73/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    7

    QUIZ:

    Determine the moment and top lateral displacement for the following

    siutations.

    2

    T

    2

    T

    b

    TEIM

    =

    (a) (b)

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    74/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    8

    Equivalent load formulation

  • 7/31/2019 PR - Shear Wall Analysis

    75/75

    CV415: Tall Buildings Lecture Notes S. K. Au

    Temperature effects at elevated temperatures (e.g., >100 C )

    A fire engineering problem

    RC column behavior is considerably nonlinear. The following effectsshould also be considered:

    o temperature dependence ofE,

    o creep effects

    o spalding (air inside concrete expand and burst off surface concrete)